Science for Saving Species Research Findings Factsheet Project 4.4.7

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science for Saving Species Research Findings Factsheet Project 4.4.7 Science for Saving Species Research findings factsheet Project 4.4.7 Woodland bird conservation in Murray-Darling Basin floodplain habitat In brief Background Floodplain ecosystems in south- The Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) that was collected over a 21-year eastern Australia’s Murray-Darling provides vital habitat for many period (1998–2018). Basin (MDB) are under stress species, including terrestrial bird The priority locations we identified from changes to the hydrologic species that depend on floodplain differed depending on management regimes, grazing and vegetation forests and woodlands. The objectives. When the focus was to clearing. Many species, including ecological condition of floodplain identify core habitat for threatened waterbirds and terrestrial birds, rely vegetation is in decline due to an bird species, floodplains along the on floodplain habitats for parts of array of threats, including changed western reaches of the Murray River their life cycles, with floodplain hydrologic regimes, and pressures had the highest priority. Conversely, ecosystems representing some of from invasive species. We aimed when non-threatened floodplain– the largest continuous stretches to provide decision support for dependent species were examined, of habitat for terrestrial woodland MDB managers by identifying the highest priority sites were birds. Threatened terrestrial bird priority habitat areas for floodplain- concentrated in the north of the species that are associated with associated terrestrial bird species. MDB to the east of Cunnamulla MDB floodplain habitats include and east of Lightning Ridge. the painted honeyeater (Grantiella We used the spatial prioritisation picta), regent parrot (Polytelis tool Zonation to create maps of Our findings can be used to anthopeplus monarchoides), floodplain vegetation habitat zones. efficiently allocate management and the superb parrot (Polytelis The maps showed the locations resources, such as environmental swainsonii). The management of of terrestrial floodplain bird habit water, so that conservation these ecosystems has important based on a prioritisation ranking. outcomes for these bird ramifications for the conservation The predictions were based on data species are optimised. of these species. State and federal governments have used management actions aimed at improving the health of the MBD system. For example, 16 wetlands have been listed as Wetlands of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention. In addition, statutory environmental water holders have been established to manage portfolios of water holdings for achieving environmental outcomes in floodplain, wetland and riverine environments, and Superb parrot. Image: Patrick_K59, CC BY 2.0 Wikimedia Commons Background (continued) What we did numerous other environmental We compiled a database of occurrence and a set of restoration activities are taking 4,555,939 presence records from environmental variables that place throughout the MDB. These existing data sources for 108 bird indicated terrestrial bird occurrence. factors represent opportunities species that had previously been The environmental variables for improving outcomes for identified as occurring commonly included measures of habitat native species who use the in MDB floodplain vegetation. extent, habitat condition and floodplain habitats at various We focused on data collected variables that affect bird distribution points in their life cycle. over a 21-year period between 1998 through their effects on physiology (e.g., longest run of consecutive Terrestrial birds are not commonly and 2018. These data were used hot and dry days). Some variables considered in the management to build individual habitat suitability were constant across years (e.g., of floodplain ecosystems, and models for each bird species. as such, further research and Two separate models were elevation), whereas other variables targeted management strategies produced for each species, one were dynamic across years are required for this community. for the breeding season and one (e.g., cumulative rainfall). Climate change–induced for the non-breeding season. We examined three different increases in the frequency and We created maps to visually display scenarios for prioritising habitat severity of drought in the MDB habitat suitability for each bird zones for terrestrial birds. First, will increase the importance species in each of the 21 years we identified priority areas that of the region’s floodplains for from 1998 to 2018. maximised the core habitat for the bird communities they We used a spatial prioritisation three threatened terrestrial birds, support. Conservation planning approach called Zonation to the painted honeyeater (Grantiella can help identify habitats and identify the most important habitat picta), regent parrot (Polytelis locations which support key areas within MDB floodplains. anthopeplus monarchoides), biodiversity. Knowing where and the superb parrot (Polytelis The modelling identified floodplain to target management actions swainsonii). Second, we identified areas that consistently provided and resources could assist priority areas that would maximise habitat with high suitability conservation of floodplain- the habitat for 50 floodplain– during the 21-year study period. dependent terrestrial birds dependent terrestrial bird species. This timespan included periods and their habitats. Finally, we identified priority areas of extreme drought (e.g., the that would maximise the habitat Millennium Drought) as well as for all floodplain–associated years with above average rainfall. Main aims terrestrial bird species. Maps We developed habitat suitability were produced to identify areas This project aimed to identify models by modelling the of conservation prioritisation which locations within the relationship between species for each of these three scenarios. Murray-Darling Basin are the most important habitat for threatened bird species, floodplain–dependent species and floodplain–associated bird species. Overall, we wanted to identify where protection and conservation efforts could be best concentrated within the MBD for the benefit of both threatened and floodplain– dependent native birds. Floodplain-dependent yellow rosella. Image: Rowan Mott Key findings We produced predicted habitat National Park, Barmah National Park, suitability maps with good predictive and Hattah-Kulkyne National Park, performance for 72 of the 108 bird as well as the New South Wales species associated with floodplain Central Murray State Forests Ramsar vegetation. Bird species we could site, Barmah Forest Ramsar Site not produce satisfactory models and Riverland Ramsar Site. for had a widespread occurrence, Some Ramsar wetlands, such as the and therefore did not have a strong Barmah Forest and Hattah Lakes affinity with any habitat type. Ramsar Sites, were almost entirely For most of the bird species ranked within the top 10% examined, the seasonal habitat of priorities when focusing on suitability predictions varied little habitat for threatened species. between years throughout the The regent parrot had a very 21-year study period. This was the restricted range, with a strong case during both the breeding preference for floodplains, and and non-breeding seasons for was the main driver of these the regent parrot, superb parrot patterns. On the other hand, and painted honeyeater. the superb parrot and painted However, for a few bird species honeyeater have a wider distribution, Painted honeyeater. Image: Stuart Harris CC BY-SA 2.0 Wikimedia Commons variations were noticeable in the and have areas with high habitat predicted habitat suitability from one suitability in both floodplain and year to the next. This was the case non–floodplain areas. Only very small areas of individual Ramsar sites were represented in the for the little friarbird and the barking Scenario 2. Floodplain–dependent top 10% of priorities for floodplain- owl during non-breeding seasons. terrestrial bird species dependent species and floodplain- We produced a set of maps that Floodplains along the Barwon, associated species. Floodplains in clearly identify the priority areas Boomi and Macintyre Rivers east the very south of the MDB, such that would maximise bird habitat of Lightning Ridge were ranked as those along the Murray River under each of the following as high priorities for floodplain– from Swan Hill eastward were three scenarios. dependent birds. Similarly, consistently ranked as lower Scenario 1. Threatened terrestrial floodplains extending west from the priorities for these bird groups. bird species Nebine Creek east of Cunnamulla, and floodplains along scattered For all three scenarios, floodplains Floodplains along the Murray creeks west of Menindee also along the Darling River between River from Swan Hill westward ranked highly in this scenario. Bourke and Menindee were never were identified as the highest ranked as high priority habitat for Scenario 3. Floodplain–associated priority habitat for the threatened terrestrial birds. Floodplains along terrestrial bird species painted honeyeater, regent parrot the Darling River and floodplains and superb parrot. (See Figure 1.) Floodplains east of Cunnamulla in the very south of the MDB were Under this scenario the model also along the Mungallala, Paterson also ranked low for floodplain- identified high priority floodplains and Widgeegoara Creeks, and associated terrestrial birds. Lower- along the eastern reaches of the floodplains in the headwaters of ranked areas
Recommended publications
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Region
    Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Wetlands Protection Project: Can Fox Control Reduce Predation of Freshwater Turtle Nests? A
    Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Wetlands Protection Project: can fox control reduce predation of freshwater turtle nests? A. Robley, K. Howard, L. Woodford, A. Taglierini, and M. Thompson August 2017 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for the Mallee Catchment Management Authority Hattah-Kulkyne fox control and turtle nest survival Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report Hattah-Kulkyne fox control and turtle nest survival Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Protection Project: can fox control reduce predation of freshwater turtle nests? Alan Robley1, Katie Howard1, Luke Woodford1, Angelo Taglierini2, and Malcolm Thompson2 1Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 2Mallee Catchment Management Authority, PO Box 5017, Mildura, Vic 3502 August 2017 In partnership with and Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Heidelberg, Victoria Hattah-Kulkyne fox control and turtle nest survival Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.delwp.vic.gov.au Citation: Robley, A., Howard, K., Woodford, L., Taglierini, A., and Thompson, M. (2017). Hattah-Kulkyne Ramsar Protection Project: can fox control reduce predation of freshwater turtle nests? Unpublished Client Report for the Mallee Catchment Management Authority. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: Lake Konardin and Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) (Alan Robley); turtle nest monitoring (Malcolm Thompson). © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice Polytelis Swainsonii Superb Parrot
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister approved this conservation advice on 5 May 2016; and confirmed this species 16 July 2000 inclusion in the Vulnerable category. Conservation Advice Polytelis swainsonii superb parrot Taxonomy Conventionally accepted as Polytelis swainsonii (Desmarest, 1826). Summary of assessment Conservation status Vulnerable: Criterion 1 A4(a)(c) The highest category for which Polytelis swainsonii is eligible to be listed is Vulnerable. Polytelis swainsonii has been found to be eligible for listing under the following listing categories: Criterion 1: A4(a)(c): Vulnerable Species can be listed as threatened under state and territory legislation. For information on the listing status of this species under relevant state or territory legislation, see http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl Reason for conservation assessment by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee The superb parrot was listed as Endangered under the predecessor to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 and transferred to the EPBC Act in June 2000. This advice follows assessment of information provided by public nomination to change the listing status of Polytelis swainsonii. Public Consultation Notice of the proposed amendment and a consultation document was made available for public comment for greater than 30 business days between 17 November 2014 and 9 January 2015. Any comments received that were relevant to the survival of the species were considered by the Committee as part of the assessment process. Species Information Description The superb parrot is a medium-sized (36–42 cm long; 133–157 g weight) slender, long-tailed green parrot.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Ecology of the Superb Parrot, Polytelis Swainsonii In
    Technical Report Breeding ecology of the superb parrot Polytelis swainsonii in northern Canberra Laura Rayner, Dejan Stojanovic, Robert Heinsohn and Adrian Manning Fenner School of Environment and Society The Australian National University This report was prepared for Environment and Planning Directorate Australian Capital Territory Government Technical Report: Superb parrot breeding in northern Canberra Acknowledgements This technical report was prepared by Professor Adrian D. Manning and Dr Laura Rayner of the Fenner School of Environment and Society (ANU). Professor Robert Heinsohn and Dr Dejan Stojanovic of the Fenner School of Environment and Society (ANU) were integral to the design and execution of research contained within. Mr Chris Davey contributed many hours of nest searching and monitoring to this project. In addition, previous reports of superb parrot breeding in the study area, prepared by Mr Davey for the Canberra Ornithologists Group, provided critical baseline data for this work. Dr Laura Rayner and Dr Dejan Stojanovic undertook all bird banding, transmitter deployment and the majority of nest checks and tree climbing. Mr Henry Cook contributed substantially to camera maintenance and transmitter retrieval. Additional field assistance was provided by Chloe Sato, Steve Holliday, Jenny Newport and Naomi Treloar. Funding and equipment support were provided by Senior Environmental Planner Dr Michael Mulvaney of the Environment and Planning Directorate (Environment Division) and Ecologist Dr Richard Milner of the Territory and Municipal Services Directorate (ACT Parks and Conservation Service). Spatial data of superb parrot breeding trees and flight paths for the Canberra region were provided by the ACT Conservation Planning and Research Directorate, (ACT Government). Mr Daniel Hill and Mr Peter Marshall of Canberra Contractors facilitated access to a nest tree located within the Throsby Development Area.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCESS PARROT Polytelis Alexandrae
    Threatened Species of the Northern Territory PRINCESS PARROT Polytelis alexandrae Conservation status Australia: Vulnerable Northern Territory: Vulnerable Princess parrot. ( Kay Kes Description Conservation reserves where reported: The princess parrot is a very distinctive bird The princess parrot is not resident in any which is slim in build, beautifully plumaged conservation reserve in the Northern and has a very long, tapering tail. It is a Territory but it has been observed regularly in medium-sized parrot with total length of 40- and adjacent to Uluru Kata Tjuta National 45 cm and body mass of 90-120 g. The basic Park, and there is at least one record from colour is dull olive-green; paler on the West MacDonnell National Park. underparts. It has a red bill, blue-grey crown, pink chin, throat and foreneck, prominent yellow-green shoulder patches, bluish rump and back, and blue-green uppertail. Distribution This species has a patchy and irregular distribution in arid Australia. In the Northern Territory, it occurs in the southern section of the Tanami Desert south to Angas Downs and Yulara and east to Alice Springs. The exact distribution within this range is not well understood and it is unclear whether the species is resident in the Northern Territory. Few locations exist in the Northern Territory where the species is regularly seen, and even Known locations of the princess parrot. then there may be long intervals (up to 20 years) between records. Most records from = pre 1970; • = post 1970. the MacDonnell Ranges bioregion are during dry periods. For more information visit www.denr.nt.gov.au Ecology • extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals
    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Australia Part Ii: Queensland, Victoria & Plains-Wanderer
    GRAND AUSTRALIA PART II: QUEENSLAND, VICTORIA & PLAINS-WANDERER OCTOBER 15–NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Southern Cassowary LEADER: DION HOBCROFT LIST COMPILED BY: DION HOBCROFT VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM GRAND AUSTRALIA PART II By Dion Hobcroft Few birds are as brilliant (in an opposite complementary fashion) as a male Australian King-parrot. On Part II of our Grand Australia tour, we were joined by six new participants. We had a magnificent start finding a handsome male Koala in near record time, and he posed well for us. With friend Duncan in the “monster bus” named “Vince,” we birded through the Kerry Valley and the country towns of Beaudesert and Canungra. Visiting several sites, we soon racked up a bird list of some 90 species with highlights including two Black-necked Storks, a Swamp Harrier, a Comb-crested Jacana male attending recently fledged chicks, a single Latham’s Snipe, colorful Scaly-breasted Lorikeets and Pale-headed Rosellas, a pair of obliging Speckled Warblers, beautiful Scarlet Myzomela and much more. It had been raining heavily at O’Reilly’s for nearly a fortnight, and our arrival was exquisitely timed for a break in the gloom as blue sky started to dominate. Pretty-faced Wallaby was a good marsupial, and at lunch we were joined by a spectacular male Eastern Water Dragon. Before breakfast we wandered along the trail system adjacent to the lodge and were joined by many new birds providing unbelievable close views and photographic chances. Wonga Pigeon and Bassian Thrush were two immediate good sightings followed closely by Albert’s Lyrebird, female Paradise Riflebird, Green Catbird, Regent Bowerbird, Australian Logrunner, three species of scrubwren, and a male Rose Robin amongst others.
    [Show full text]
  • There Has Been an Italian Presence in the Riverland Since
    1 Building blocks of settlement: Italians in the Riverland, South Australia By Sara King and Desmond O’Connor The Riverland region is situated approximately 200 km. north-east of Adelaide and consists of a strip of land on either side of the River Murray from the South Australian-Victorian border westwards to the town of Morgan. Covering more than 20,000 sq. km., it encompasses the seven local government areas of Barmera, Berri, Loxton, Morgan, Paringa, Renmark and Waikerie.1 The region was first identified as an area of primary production in 1887 when two Canadian brothers, George and William Chaffey, were granted a licence to occupy 101,700 hectares of land at Renmark in order to establish an irrigated horticultural scheme. By 1900 a prosperous settlement had developed in the area for the production of vines and fruit, and during the 1890s Depression other ‘village settlements’ were established down river by the South Australian Government to provide work for the city-based unemployed.2 During the years between the foundation of the villages and the First World War there was intense settlement, especially around Waikerie, Loxton, Berri and Barmera, as the area was opened up and increased in value.3 After World War 1, the SA Government made available new irrigation blocks at Renmark and other localities in the Riverland area to assist the resettlement of more than a thousand returned soldiers. A similar scheme operated in New South Wales, where returned servicemen were offered blocks in Leeton and Griffith, in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area.4 The period after World War 2 saw further settlement of returned soldiers on fruit blocks in the Riverland and new irrigation areas were developed to cater for this growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Regent Honeyeater Identification Guide
    REGENT HONEYEATER IDENTIFICATION GUIDE Broad patch of bare warty Males call prominently, skin around the eye, which whereas females only is smaller in young birds occasionally make soft calls. and females. Best seen at close range or with binoculars. Plumage around the head Regent Honeyeaters are and neck is solid black 20-24 cm long, with females giving a slightly hooded smaller and having duller appearance. plumage than the males. Distinctive scalloped (not streaked) breast. Broad stripes of yellow in the wing when folded, and very prominent in flight. From below the tail is a bright yellow. From behind it’s black bordered by bright yellow feathers. COMMON MISIDENTIFICATIONS YELLOW-TUFTED HONEYEATER NEW HOLLAND HONEYEATER WHITE-CHEEKED HONEYEATER Lichenostomus melanops Phylidonyris novaehollandiae Phylidonyris niger Habitat: Box-Gum-Ironbark Habitat: Woodland with heathy Habitat: Heathlands, parks and woodlands and forest with a understorey, gardens and gardens, less commonly open shrubby understorey. parklands. woodland. Notes: Common, sedentary bird Notes: Often misidentified as a Notes: Similar to New Holland of temperate woodlands. Has a Regent Honeyeater; commonly Honeyeaters, but have a large distinctive yellow crown and ear seen in urban parks and gardens. patch of white feathers in their tuft in a black face, with a bright Distinctive white breast with black cheek and a dark eye (no white yellow throat. Underparts are streaks, several patches of white eye ring). Also have white breast plain dirty yellow, upperparts around the face, and a white eye streaked black. olive-green. ring. Tend to be in small, noisy and aggressive flocks. PAINTED HONEYEATER CRESCENT HONEYEATER Grantiella picta Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus Habitat: Box-Ironbark woodland, Habitat: Wetter habitats like particularly with fruiting mistletoe forest, dense woodland and Notes: A seasonal migrant, only coastal heathlands.
    [Show full text]