DOCSLIB.ORG

An Evaluation of the Palestinian National Authority's Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Evaluation of the Palestinian National Authority's Policy Building a state on shifting sands: An evaluation of the Palestinian National Authority’s policy reforms and performance in the West Bank, 2009-2011 By Kristine Knutter C2013 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Global and International Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Chairperson Associate Professor Eric Hanley ________________________________ Co-Chairperson Professor Richard Lynn Ground ________________________________ Committee Member Associate Professor Ebenezer Obadare Date Defended: January 8, 2013 The Thesis Committee for Kristine Knutter certifies That this is the approved Version of the following thesis: Building a state on shifting sands: An evaluation of the Palestinian National Authority’s policy reforms and performance in the West Bank, 2009-2011 _____________________________ Chairperson Eric Hanley _____________________________ Co-Chairperson Richard Lynn Ground _____________________________ Committee Member Ebenezer Obadari Date Approved: January 8, 2013 ii ABSTRACT Kristine Knutter, M.A. Department of Global and International Studies, January 2013 University of Kansas Since the inception of the Palestinian National Authority (PA) in 1994, leadership has struggled in its role to create a safe environment conducive to economic and social prosperity, and to negotiate an end to the Israeli occupation and recognition of an independent State of Palestine. Following a violent Palestinian uprising against the Israeli occupation from 2000 to 2005, the Palestinian legislature crumbled after there was international fallout with the PA over Hamas winning a majority of the legislature seats. Since 2007, Hamas has ruled in the Gaza Strip largely independent of the PA and a Fatah-dominant Palestinian caretaker government has ruled in the West Bank. There have been substantial differences between the trajectory of their economic, geopolitical, legal and social development. In the West Bank, PA leaders unveiled a series of state and institution building plans anchored in a commitment to security that garnered broad international support. This thesis provides a historical account of the development of the PA institutions and the limits of its authority in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The primary research aim of this thesis is to evaluate the effectiveness of the state and institution building plan, Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State, in the West Bank during the 2009-2011 period in regards to the security landscape, judicial system, and economic development in the West Bank, as well as the attempt to end the occupation and solidify recognition as a sovereign Palestinian state. Underlying pressures on state building in Palestine are identified and this thesis presents a strategy for Palestinian leadership so that when it comes to the negotiating table with Israel, it will be as a respected, organized and united body that has enacted all measures possible to guarantee the degree of peace and prosperity that are within their control. While Palestinians’ ultimate aim is statehood recognition and an end to the Israeli occupation, this thesis argues that reforming the Israeli-Palestinian economic framework is a critical first step to advancing Palestinian national interests and state and institution building aims. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and History The primary research aim of this thesis is to evaluate the effectiveness of the state and institution building plan, Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State, in the West Bank during the 2009-2011 period in regards to the security landscape, judicial system, and economic development in the West Bank, as well as the attempt to end the occupation and solidify recognition as a sovereign Palestinian state. Understanding the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is paramount to understanding and analyzing current efforts. An account of the historic developments leading up to the modern-day Israeli-Palestinian conflict is detailed in the thesis. Currently, the West Bank is one of the two territories that make up the contended Palestinian state that have been occupied by Israel since the 1967 Six-Day War. Upon the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands, which in the years prior to the Six-Day War had been controlled by Jordan and Egypt, Israel annexed East Jerusalem and Israelis began moving onto the land and establishing settlements in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Notably, the Government of Israel (GoI) insisted that the West Bank and Gaza Strip were captured in a defensive war and therefore the GoI had legitimate claims to ownership and should not accommodate Palestinians claims to the land. Relative calm prevailed for the first twenty years of the occupation and then unrest between Palestinians and Israelis erupted in 1987 into the first Palestinian uprising against the occupation, known as the First Intifada. A few years into fighting, Israel was willing to cede some control over the West Bank and Gaza Strip to Palestinians. By 1993, the GoI and representatives of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) officially brought the conflict to an end with the signing of the Oslo Accords. The parties agreed to a temporary framework for their relations during an interim period lasting five years, during which time, the sides would agree on important issues such as borders, refugees, Jerusalem, and settlements through bilateral negotiations. The Accords resulted in the creation of an interim Palestinian governing body known as the Palestinian National Authority (PA). The PA assumed some of the responsibilities of a typical governing body in parts of the West Bank and Gaza Strip (WBGS), while Israel retained other powers and overarching control over security. One of the key documents produced in the Oslo Accords was the Protocol on Economic Relations (PER), which governed economic relations between the PA and the GoI. iv The development process was slow and complicated, and was further challenged by inept and corrupt Palestinian leaders. Both the GoI and the PA showed a reluctance to implement the terms of the Oslo Accords, which had negative repercussions on the lives of Palestinians in the WBGS. Palestinians grew frustrated with Israeli policies, such as the expansion of settlements and restrictions on Palestinian movement. These frustrations, along with an interim period much longer than expected during which time the PLO and GoI failed to reach a peace agreement, culminated in the Second Intifada in 2000, which had a strong negative impact on Palestinian and Israeli lives and stalled important state building work in Palestine. The Second Intifada came to an official end in 2005, and the PA found a more competent leader in Mahmoud Abbas, who replaced the deceased Yasser Arafat as president. The rise of Mahmoud Abbas ushered in a new type of Palestinian leadership. Abbas set out to reform the PA, to strengthen Palestinian institutions, and to engage diplomatically with Israel to improve living conditions for Palestinians and advance Palestinian goals. However, when the political party Hamas won a majority of the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) seats in 2006, the situation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip quickly deteriorated. The international community, especially the United States (U.S.) and GoI, boycotted the election results and cut funding to the PA because the winning political party, Hamas, was designated as a terrorist organization in these countries. A series of contentious events followed, resulting in a sharp divide and armed conflict between Hamas and Fatah and the dissolution of the PLC. In 2007, Abbas appointed the American-trained and former International Monetary Fund (IMF) economist Salam Fayyad to serve as Prime Minister of a caretaker government in the West Bank, which gained legitimacy and wide international support for its proposed reform agenda, while the majority of the international community increased the intensity of the boycott and sanctions on the Hamas-led government in the Gaza Strip. Under the leadership of Fayyad and Abbas, the PA set out to implement a state and institution building plan that it believed would help end the Israeli occupation and advance Palestinian national aspirations including widespread recognition of an independent Palestinian state along 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. Judiciary Reforms and Performance During the Oslo era, the PA assumed responsibility for legal jurisdiction in areas of its control through the signing of the Gaza-Jericho Agreement on May 4, 1994, and the subsequent v creation of the PLC. The Palestinian judiciary was responsible for interpreting and helping enforce laws and beginning in 2002, it was guided by the Palestinian Basic Law (an interim constitution). The nascent Palestinian judicial system largely performed poorly during the 1990s, being marked by corruption, fixed trials, and a lack of enforcement of court decisions. The PA, through the caretaker government in the West Bank, committed to reforming the justice sector by delivering on promises of an independent and impartial judiciary, which was mandated in the Palestinian Basic Law and reaffirmed in the 2009-2011 Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State plan. The PA advanced many of its broad judiciary goals during the reform years 2009-2011, some of which included promulgating and implementing laws to protect citizens’ fundamental rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Palestinians
    1 "There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity, because it is in the interest of the Arabs to encourage a separate Palestinian identity in contrast to Zionism. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity is there only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a new expedient to continue the fight against Zionism and for Arab unity." Zuheir Mohsen, head of the Saiqa terrorist organization, head of mili- tary operations for the PLO and a member of its Supreme Council as interviewed by James Dorsey in the Dutch daily Trouw, March 31, 1977. 2 The Authors ARTHUR KAHN is a member of the bar and a commodities and stockbroker. He has published articles on the Middle East in the Jewish Frontier and Congress Monthly. THOMAS F. MURRAY is the pseudonym of an author who has written extensively about the Middle East. Design and layout by Frances Besner Newman Copyright 1977 by Americans For a Safe Israel 3 ncreasingly what President Carter has called "a Palestinian home- I land," what others more openly call a Palestinian state, has become identified as the key to the solution of the Arab-Israel conflict. If President Carter has only recently enunciated American support for the idea, European statesmen have been openly espousing this "solution" for several years. Visiting Egypt in 1975 Valery Giscard d'Estaing announced that "the Palestinian people have the right, like others, to an independent homeland") Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky asserted there was a chance for peace provided a Palestinian state was created on the West Bank and in Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outcome of Invasion: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq
    a report of the csis burke chair in strategy The Outcome of Invasion: US and Iranian Strategic Competition in Iraq Authors Adam Mausner Sam Khazai Anthony H. Cordesman Peter Alsis Charles Loi March 2012 Chapter VII: US Strategic Competition with Iran: Competition in Iraq 16/3/12 2 Executive Summary "Americans planted a tree in Iraq. They watered that tree, pruned it, and cared for it. Ask your American friends why they're leaving now before the tree bears fruit." --Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.1 Iraq has become a key focus of the strategic competition between the United States and Iran. The history of this competition has been shaped by the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the 1991 Gulf War, the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and now by the withdrawal of US military forces. It is a competition increasingly shaped by Iraq’s turbulent domestic politics and power struggles, and where both the US and Iran compete to shape the structure of Iraq’s future politics, governance, economics, and security. An Uncertain Level of US Influence The US has gone to great lengths to counter Iranian influence in Iraq, including using its status as an occupying power and Iraq’s main source of aid, as well as through information operations and more traditional press statements highlighting Iranian meddling. However, containing Iranian influence, while important, is not America’s main goal in Iraq. It is rather to create a stable democratic Iraq that can defeat the remaining extremist and insurgent elements, defend against foreign threats, sustain an able civil society, and emerge as a stable power friendly to the US and its Gulf allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Secular Opposition
    IRAQ’S SECULAR OPPOSITION: THE RISE AND DECLINE OF AL-IRAQIYA Middle East Report N°127 – 31 July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 A. A PERMANENT STATE OF CRISIS .................................................................................................. 2 B. A LOOMING SHOWDOWN ............................................................................................................. 3 II. IRAQIYA’S ORIGINS ..................................................................................................... 5 A. 1991-2005: THE ROAD TO BAGHDAD ........................................................................................... 5 B. 2005-2009: IRAQIYA’S CREATION, FALL AND REBIRTH ............................................................... 6 1. Retreat .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. A new opening ............................................................................................................................. 8 III. AN ALLIANCE IN FLUX ................................................................................................ 9 A. MEMBERSHIP AND CONSTITUENCY ............................................................................................ 10 1. A
    [Show full text]
  • From Dictatorship to Democracy: Iraq Under Erasure Abeer Shaheen
    From Dictatorship to Democracy: Iraq under Erasure Abeer Shaheen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 ©2015 Abeer Shaheen All rights reserved ABSTRACT From Dictatorship to Democracy: Iraq under Erasure Abeer Shaheen This dissertation examines the American project in Iraq between 1991 and 2006. It studies the project’s conceptual arc, shifting ontology, discourses, institutions, practices, and technologies in their interrelatedness to constitute a new Iraq. It is an ethnography of a thixotropic regime of law and order in translation; a circuit through various landscapes and temporalities to narrate the 1991 war, the institutionalization of sanctions and inspection regimes, material transformations within the American military, the 2003 war and finally the nation- building processes as a continuous and unitary project. The dissertation makes three central arguments: First, the 2003 war on Iraq was imagined through intricate and fluid spaces and temporalities. Transforming Iraq into a democratic regime has served as a catalyst for transforming the American military organization and the international legal system. Second, this project has reordered the spatialized time of Iraq by the imposition of models in translation, reconfigured and reimagined through a realm of violence. These models have created in Iraq a regime of differential mobility, which was enabled through an ensemble of experts, new institutions and calculative technologies. Third, this ensemble took Iraq as its object of knowledge and change rendering Iraq and Iraqis into a set of abstractions within the three spaces under examination: the space of American military institutions; the space of international legality within the United Nations; and, lastly, the material space of Baghdad.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq in Crisis
    Burke Chair in Strategy Iraq in Crisis By Anthony H. Cordesman and Sam Khazai January 24, 2014 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai January 24, 2014 Update ii Acknowledgements This analysis was written with the assistance of Burke Chair researcher Daniel Dewitt. Iraq in Crisis: Cordesman and Khazai January 24, 2014 Update iii Executive Summary As events in late December 2013 and early 2014 have made brutally clear, Iraq is a nation in crisis bordering on civil war. It is burdened by a long history of war, internal power struggles, and failed governance. Is also a nation whose failed leadership is now creating a steady increase in the sectarian divisions between Shi’ite and Sunni, and the ethnic divisions between Arab and Kurd. Iraq suffers badly from the legacy of mistakes the US made during and after its invasion in 2003. It suffers from threat posed by the reemergence of violent Sunni extremist movements like Al Qaeda and equally violent Shi’ite militias. It suffers from pressure from Iran and near isolation by several key Arab states. It has increasingly become the victim of the forces unleashed by the Syrian civil war. The country’s main threats, however, result from self-inflicted wounds caused by its political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Response to the Syrian Invasion of Lebanon in 1976. Bjarte Bjørsvik
    The Soviet response to the Syrian invasion of Lebanon in 1976. Bjarte Bjørsvik HIS 350 Master thesis Department for Archaeology, History, Cultural studies and Religion University of Bergen 2018 Title page photos: Upper photo: Syrian President Hafez al-Assad and Secretary General of the Soviet Communist Party Leonid Brezhnev.1 Lower photo: President Hafez al-Assad and PLO leader Yasser Arafat.2 1 Holtland, Jenne Jan, «Hafiz al-Assad & Brezhnev. Plus ca change, plus c'est la même chose». 2 Cohen, David. «Emergence of Palestinian Identity». ii Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................vi Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Research question ............................................................................................................................... 2 Limitation of time, actors and themes ................................................................................................ 2 Why is this topic important? ............................................................................................................... 3 Method: Sources and the use of sources ............................................................................................. 5 Theory: What kind
    [Show full text]
  • OF BERGEN COUNTY CANDLE August 30 | 23 Elul August 22,2013 - 16 Elul 5772 Vol
    201-816-4000 Dr. Jeremy Peyser Dr. Nicolas Elian Dr. Martha Miqueo Vizstara Dental 300 Sylvan Ave. Floor 3 Englewood Cliffs NJ, 07632 THE JEWISH LINK www.vizstaradental.com Back To School August 23 | 17 Elul Edition Light Candles 7:24 Shabbos Ends: 8:31 OF BERGEN COUNTY CANDLE August 30 | 23 Elul August 22,2013 - 16 Elul 5772 Vol. 1 No. 12 www.jewishlinkbc.com Distributed every other week LIGHTING Light Candles 7:13 Shabbos Ends: 8:20 Weinberg: Forget About Iran, Syria: Smuggling Weapons Vouchers Happening To Gain InĚ uence In The West Bank Anytime Soon (Republished with permission of Stratfor. Visit www.stratfor.com) By Jeanette Friedman $10K GIVEAWAY Teaneck—In a recent SEE BACK COVER phone interview with State Senate Majority Whip Loretta Weinberg, the legislator said that no school voucher bills will be passing through the legislature down in Tren- ton next session. She did say, however, that the leg- islature trying to get fund- ing for non-sectarian serv- ices in sectarian schools See ad on Page 19 CONTINUED ON P. 15 Oh Camp HASC, Palestinian militants in Saair, West Bank, on Feb. 25. (Photo by Uriel Sinai/Getty Images) (www.Stratfor.com)—In the past sever- loaded with watermelons, but when the Our Son’s Summer Home! al days, Jordanian authorities have report- two trucks traveled beyond the main pro- ed two separate incidents in which groups duce market and kept heading south, the By Moshe & Dena Kinderlehrer of smugglers traveling from Syria have Jordanian police became suspicious. Jor- been caught with weapons and drugs in dan’s state-owned Petra news agency said e know what people will think when they see this: Jordan.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Decades of Philanthropy for Palestine
    2013 T OR P THREE DECADES OF Empowering Individuals, Developing Society Y RE T An Ongoing Committment ... PHILANTHROPY FOR PALESTINE AINABILI T 2013 WA SUS WA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT THREE DECADES OF PHILANTHROPY FOR PALESTINE 2013 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2 | Three Decades of Philanthropy for Palestine-Welfare Association Community Based Rehabilitation Project, Special Education ParticipantsChapter 3 | 3 CONTENTS 7 List of Abbreviations 48 VI. Internal Operations 8 Message from the Chairperson of the Welfare Association, Dr. Nabil Hani Qaddumi 50 A. Financial Sustainability and Accountability 9 Message from the Director General of the Welfare Association, Dr. Tafeeda Jarbawi 50 Commitments 51 Top Donors throughout the Strategic Plan 2011-2013 10 I. Sustainability and the Welfare Association (WA) 52 B. Social Performance 12 A. Welfare Association 52 Sustainable Human Resource Management 13 Our Vision 52 Policies and Procedures 13 Our Mission 52 Employment and Diversity 13 Our Values 53 Employee Satisfaction 13 Our Strategic Goals 53 Grievances and Employee-Management Policy 13 Work Tracks and Sectors of Intervention 53 Training and Development 14 B. About this Report 54 Benefits 14 C. Scope and Data 54 Health and Safety 15 D. Sustainability Focus Areas 54 Volunteers 54 Human Rights 16 II. Our Approach to Sustainability 55 Integrity 18 A. Governance 55 Sustainable Procurement 19 The General Assembly (GA) 55 Commitments 19 The Board of Trustees (BoT) 55 C. Institutional Management and Performance 20 The Board of Directors (BoD) 56 Quality Management 20 Good Governance and Integrity 56 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) 21 Commitments 56 Information Technology 22 B. Stakeholder Engagement 56 Commitments 23 Commitments 56 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Yasser Arafat
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified February 14, 1974 Minutes of Conversation between Nicolae Ceaușescu, the General Secretary of the Romanian Communist Party, and the Delegation of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, led by Yasser Arafat Citation: “Minutes of Conversation between Nicolae Ceaușescu, the General Secretary of the Romanian Communist Party, and the Delegation of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, led by Yasser Arafat,” February 14, 1974, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, ANIC, C.C. al P.C.R., Sectia Relatii Externe, dosar 20/1974, pp. 94-116. Contributed and translated by Eliza Gheorghe. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/219942 Summary: Yasir Arafat and Nicolae Ceaușescu discuss policy for Palestine and the diplomatic relationship between the two entities. Credits: This document was made possible with support from Bilkent University. Original Language: Romanian Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document Minutes of conversation between Nicolae Ceaușescu, the General Secretary of the Romanian Communist Party, and the delegation of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, led by Yasser Arafat - February 14 1974, Beirut - On behalf of the Romanian [government], comrades Cornel Burtică, Ion Păţan, George Macovescu and Nicolae Doicaru attended the meeting. On behalf of the Palestinian delegation, Yasser Abd Rabbo, member of the Executive Committee, representative of Popular Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Abu Lutf [Farouk Kaddoumi], member of the Executive Committee, Abu Nidal, member of the Executive Committee, Zuheir Mohsen, the head of al-Sai’qa, Hani al Hassan [Abu Tariq], political adviser. [Exchange of pleasantries] Yasser Arafat: Although this palace belongs to Lebanon, we think it is our palace.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Israel: an Appraisal
    The State of Israel: An Appraisal CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................. 1 Resolving Conflict ....................................................................... 2 Introduction.............................................................................. 3 1. Modern Era........................................................................... 5 2. Old Testament Era ................................................................. 26 3. New Testament ..................................................................... 30 4. The Diaspora ........................................................................ 33 5. Security and Justice................................................................ 35 6. Reconciliation ....................................................................... 46 God’s Land ............................................................................... 49 Sharing the Pain ........................................................................ 50 Appendix 1 – The Origins of Replacement Theology (Supersessionism) ........ 52 Appendix 2 - Timeline.................................................................. 56 Maps....................................................................................... 58 Published by the The Maranatha Community UK Office, 102 Irlam Road, Flixton, Manchester M41 6JT Tel: 0161 748 4858 Fax: 0161 747 7379 Email: [email protected] www.maranathacommunity.org.uk Foreword In 2011, Dennis Wrigley, co-founder
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Military Establishment in 2019: Sectarianism, Militias, and Foreign Investment
    The Syrian Military Establishment in 2019: Sectarianism, Militias, and Foreign Investment Note of Appreciation Omran Center for Strategic Studies expresses its appreciation to the Carnegie Middle East Center for its partnership and support in this project funded by the European Union and Germany as part of the Syria Peace Process Support Initiative (SPPSI). All the information, ideas, opinions, themes and supplements contained in this book are the express the views of the authors and their research efforts and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Carnegie Middle East Center or the donors. -4- The Syrian Military Establishment in 2019: Sectarianism, Militias and Foreign Investment Omran Center for Strategic Studies Omran Center for Strategic Studies An independent think tank and policy research center focusing on presenting an objective understanding of Syria and the region to become a reference for public policies impacting the region. Omran began in November 2013 in Istanbul, Turkey. It publishes studies and policy briefs regarding Syrian and regional affairs in the areas of politics, economic development, and local administration. Omran also conducts round-table discussions, seminars, and workshops that promote a more systematic and methodical culture of decision making among future leaders of Syria. Omran’s work support decision making mechanisms, provide practical solutions and policy recommendations to decision makers, identify challenges within the Syrian context, and foresee scenarios and alternative solutions Website: www.OmranStudies.org Email: [email protected] Published in Arabic and English on May, 2019 © All rights reserved to Omran for Strategic Studies Contributors Ayman Al-Dassouky Navvar Şaban Ayman Abu Hashem Maen Tallaa Anwar Majani Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Secular Opposition: the Rise and Decline of Al-Iraqiya
    IRAQ’S SECULAR OPPOSITION: THE RISE AND DECLINE OF AL-IRAQIYA Middle East Report N°127 – 31 July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 A. A PERMANENT STATE OF CRISIS .................................................................................................. 2 B. A LOOMING SHOWDOWN ............................................................................................................. 3 II. IRAQIYA’S ORIGINS ..................................................................................................... 5 A. 1991-2005: THE ROAD TO BAGHDAD ........................................................................................... 5 B. 2005-2009: IRAQIYA’S CREATION, FALL AND REBIRTH ............................................................... 6 1. Retreat .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. A new opening ............................................................................................................................. 8 III. AN ALLIANCE IN FLUX ................................................................................................ 9 A. MEMBERSHIP AND CONSTITUENCY ............................................................................................ 10 1. A
    [Show full text]