DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Political Research Quarterly Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Political Research Quarterly Annual Report Political Research Quarterly 2016 Activity Report Clarissa Rile Hayward, Co-Editor Jeanette M. Mendez, Co-Editor James Scott, Co-Editor Jacob A. Mauslein, Associate Editor Connor Alford & Jonnathon Hicks, Editorial Assistants (Spring 2016) David Huntsman & Jonnathon Hicks, Editorial Assistants (Fall 2016) Department of Political Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: http://prq.sagepub.com/ Presented to the Editorial Advisory Board WPSA Annual Meeting, April 13-15, 2017 Vancouver, Canada Overview On July 1, 2014, Political Research Quarterly (PRQ) officially transitioned from Washington State University (WSU) to Oklahoma State University (OSU). PRQ underwent further transition on September 4, 2015 when Jason Maloy, former co-editor and part of the OSU team, resigned his position and Clarissa Hayward (Washington University in St. Louis) and James Scott (Texas Christian University), joined Jeanette Mendez (OSU) as co-editors. The 2016 calendar represents the first full year of editorial management for this team, which retains Jacob Mauslein as Associate Editor and two Editorial Assistants (M.A. students at OSU). Members of the WPSA Executive Council, especially President Julie Novkov, Executive Director Richard Clucas, and Associate Director Elsa J. Favila, have been extremely helpful. We would also like to thank Mark Button at the University of Utah, as well as the staff at SAGE Publications, for their support and guidance throughout the transition process. In line with WPSA’s emphasis on scholarly diversity and pluralism, 2016 involved continued steps to raise the journal’s profile among scholars across various fields of study, particularly targeting efforts to increase PRQ’s visibility across under-represented subfields (with respect to PRQ’s history) in accordance with our original strategic plan/proposal. Building on the steps we implemented in 2015 to expand our editorial board to increase the presence of International Relations, Comparative Politics, and Political Theory within PRQ, we took additional steps in 2016 to strengthen our board. As some of our existing board members’ terms expired, we took the opportunity to fill positions with strategically selected members who further contribute to the expansion of PRQ’s profile (see our full editorial board list at the end of this report). We also held roundtable panels at the 2016 WPSA meeting to address publishing in PRQ and data transparency for both qualitative and quantitative scholars, hosted a “Meet the Editors” roundtable with fellow journal editors from APSR, JOP, and PGI, and conducted a well-attended journal board meeting at the 2016 APSA meeting. We also continued our efforts to expand the journal’s database of invited reviewers, and made systematic outreach efforts in the Political Theory, International Relations and Comparative Politics subfields, while continuing our efforts in the traditional areas of strength for the journal. A key element of these efforts involved attendance at specialized conferences where our editors engaged in efforts to publicize the journal and recruit manuscripts. In 2016, our editors attended meetings of the Southern Political Science Association, International Studies Association-Midwest conference, Association for Political Theory, International Studies Association, Great Plains Political Science Association, and the Jean Monnet Conference (Scotland). These outreach efforts are long-term efforts that we expect to yield increasingly positive results in the future. Reflecting the strong bond between WPSA and PRQ, winners of the seven paper awards for each annual meeting of WPSA receive an expedited review process (i.e., an automatic “Revise and Resubmit” invitation) in PRQ. In addition to continuing this practice, we informally reached out to authors of many papers at 2016 conferences such as WPSA, APSA, ISA, ISA-Midwest, and the APT to urge them to consider PRQ as a potential venue for publication. We see this kind of outreach as a way to accentuate the notion that the conference can be a stepping-stone to publication after a rigorous peer-review process. 2 Finally, following a productive editorial board meeting at APSA in the fall, we began a PRQ Twitter account -- @PRQjournal. We use this account to publicize new articles when they are available on OnlineFirst, as well as to collaborate with WPSA and sister journals to bring events and scholarship to our followers’ attention. We began the Twitter account in late 2016, and currently have 145 followers as of the end of March 2017. Overall, we believe that PRQ’s influence within the discipline remains steady and significant at the end of both transitions (from WSU to OSU and then among editors in September 2015). Manuscript Submissions PRQ received 411 original submissions in 2016. The total for the year equaled submissions from 2015 and was near a record high for the journal, slightly lower than 2014, but far above the average from 2007-2013. The data reported below for manuscript submissions include field breakdowns, processing times, and decision ratios. In addition to 411 original submissions, we report data for 110 revised manuscript submissions in these sections. Figure 1. Original Manuscript Submissions, 2007-2016 500 438 450 411 411 383 400 367 375 355 342 350 314 319 300 250 200 Number of Manuscripts of Number 150 100 50 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thus, submissions are healthy and steady. Moreover, in the first quarter of 2017, manuscript submission is significantly ahead of the pace from 2016, suggesting the likelihood of further increase for the current year. We anticipate remaining at or around 400-450 submissions this year which, given the structural constraints of our page limits in the journal, is a good level to maintain. This number keeps our acceptance rate on par with top journals, between 10-15%. A sizable increase in submissions above this level would mean an even lower acceptance rate. 3 PRQ uses nine primary field categories for classifying manuscripts and reviewers. These are: • American Politics • Comparative Politics • Gender, Race, and Identity • International Relations • Methodology • Political Theory • Public Administration • Public Policy • Public Law When authors submit their research in the SAGEtrack online system, they are asked to select one of these categories as a primary field that best represents the nature of their research. Figure 2 (below) presents the breakdown of original submissions by the nine primary fields for 2016. Figure 2. Original Manuscript Submissions by Primary Subfield, 2016 Public Policy Public Law 5% 3% Public Admin. 2% Political Theory 10% American Politics Methodology 35% 1% International Relations 9% Gender, Race, & Identity 9% Comparative Politics 26% Overall, these numbers are quite similar to 2015. Our three targeted subfields remained at 45% of our submissions cumulatively; while IR submissions declined, PT and CP submissions increased. We continue to accelerate our efforts to increase IR submissions. In order to capture more accurately the substance of manuscripts in future reports, since July 2014 we allow more than one field to be counted per manuscript. Counting more than one field 4 per manuscript (the “open count” method) fits the stated goal of our editorial application by encouraging research that straddles or crosses subfield boundaries. It also may give a truer picture of the contents of manuscripts than counting only the single self-identified field (the “single count” method), which sometimes forces authors to make a difficult choice between fields when submitting their manuscript. Table 1 (below) presents all-fields data for 2016. These open-count numbers are not strictly comparable with the single-count data presented above, but they will provide a baseline for comparison in future annual reports. There are three categories of interest: original submissions, revised submissions, and printed articles. The open-count method is designed to reflect the reader’s perspective more realistically: what percentage of all manuscripts may strongly appeal to readers interested in any given field? Table 1. Original Manuscripts using “Open Count” Method, 2016 Percentage of all Manuscript Type Primary Field Secondary Field Total Fields Manuscripts American Politics 145 57 202 49.15% Comparative 107 40 147 35.77% Politics Gender, Race, & 37 18 55 13.38% Identity International 38 10 48 11.68% Relations Methodology 5 7 12 2.92% Political Theory 39 19 58 14.11% Public 7 9 16 3.89% Administration Public Law 14 6 20 4.87% Public Policy 19 27 46 11.19% Summary 411 193 604 146.96% These data show that, on average, about half of the new submissions in 2016 made a substantial appeal to more than one field (hence the ratio of all fields to the number of manuscripts adds up to over 140%). Unsurprisingly, each field’s percentage share is higher than with the single-count method, reflecting the reality that around half of submitted manuscripts do hold substantive interest for more than one field. These figures also show that our targeted subfields saw increased submissions of about 7%, from just over 57% to just under 62%. Finally, we would like to acknowledge that PRQ receives and accepts submissions from around the world. In 2016, while 71.6% of new submissions came from the United States, 3.2% came from the United Kingdom, 2.9% were submitted from Canada, and between 1% and 1.96% came from China, Denmark, or Sweden. (For more details, see the 2016 SAGE publisher’s report.) 5 Processing Times Both editorial teams have maintained a streamlined review process to ensure timely decisions on manuscripts. The average time in review at the journal, from submission to first decision, remains slightly under two months for original submissions. The average time in review for revised manuscripts is 51.5 days, which is up somewhat from 2015, but still under two months. Figure 3 (below) provides data on the average number of days between manuscript submission and editorial decisions for both original and revised manuscripts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitutional Patriotism” the Answer?
    Democracy’s Identity Problem: Is “Constitutional Patriotism” the Answer? Clarissa Rile Hayward NOVEMBER 2006, PAPER NUMBER 27 © 2006 Unpublished by Clarissa Rile Hayward The Occasional Papers of the School of Social Science are versions of talks given at the School’s weekly Thursday Seminar. At these seminars, Members present work-in-progress and then take questions. There is often lively conversation and debate, some of which will be included with the papers. We have chosen papers we thought would be of interest to a broad audience. Our aim is to capture some part of the cross-disciplinary conversations that are the mark of the School’s programs. While Members are drawn from specific disciplines of the social sciences—anthropology, economics, sociology and political science—as well as history, philosophy, literature and law, the School encourages new approaches that arise from exposure to different forms of interpretation. The papers in this series differ widely in their topics, methods, and disciplines. Yet they concur in a broadly humanistic attempt to under- stand how, and under what conditions, the concepts that order experience in different cultures and societies are produced, and how they change. Clarissa Rile Hayward is Associate Professor of Political Science at Ohio State University, where she teaches political theory in the political science department. Her research and teach- ing interests include democratic theory; theories of identity, power, and justice; urban politics; and political aspects of education. Hayward was a Member of the School of Social Science and a National Endowment for the Humanities Fellow at IAS in 2005-2006. During her year at the Institute, she worked on a book manuscript, tentatively titled Cities and Citizens, which explores the ways that democratic state actors shape political identities through institutions that racialize and privatize urban space.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty's Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism
    Ash Center Occasional Papers Tony Saich, Series Editor Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism Joshua Forstenzer University of Sheffield (UK) July 2018 Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center Occasional Papers Series Series Editor Tony Saich Deputy Editor Jessica Engelman The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excellence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion. By training the very best leaders, developing powerful new ideas, and disseminating innovative solutions and institutional reforms, the Center’s goal is to meet the profound challenges facing the world’s citizens. The Ford Foundation is a founding donor of the Center. Additional information about the Ash Center is available at ash.harvard.edu. This research paper is one in a series funded by the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. The views expressed in the Ash Center Occasional Papers Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series are intended to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. This paper is copyrighted by the author(s). It cannot be reproduced or reused without permission. Ash Center Occasional Papers Tony Saich, Series Editor Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism Joshua Forstenzer University of Sheffield (UK) July 2018 Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School Letter from the Editor The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excellence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobody to Shoot? Power, Structure, and Agency: a Dialogue. Journal
    This article was downloaded by: On: 30 January 2009 Access details: Access Details: Free Access Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Power Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t778749998 Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue Clarissa Hayward a; Steven Lukes b a Washington University in Saint Louis, Political Science, b New York University, Sociology, Online Publication Date: 01 April 2008 To cite this Article Hayward, Clarissa and Lukes, Steven(2008)'Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue',Journal of Power,1:1,5 — 20 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/17540290801943364 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17540290801943364 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difference States Make: Democracy, Identity, and the American City Author(S): Clarissa Rile Hayward Source: the American Political Science Review, Vol
    The Difference States Make: Democracy, Identity, and the American City Author(s): Clarissa Rile Hayward Source: The American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 4 (Nov., 2003), pp. 501-514 Published by: American Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593020 Accessed: 29/01/2009 21:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=apsa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Political Science Review. http://www.jstor.org American Political Science Review Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorizing Conservative Egalitarianism by Erin Baribeau a Disserta
    Taxpayers and Homeowners, Forgotten Men, and Citizen-Workers: Theorizing Conservative Egalitarianism by Erin Baribeau A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Lisa J. Disch (Chair) Professor Pamela Brandwein Professor Robert Mickey Professor Matthew D. Lassiter Copyright Erin Baribeau 2014 Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank Lisa Disch for her inspiration and unflagging support and guidance, both throughout my graduate career and at every step in the writing of this dissertation. I would also like to express my deep gratitude to Pamela Brandwein and Robert Mickey, both of whom have played a tremendous role in sparking my research interests, and in pushing me to be more precise when developing and articulating my ideas and arguments. Matthew Lassiter has provided great clarity and much needed historical insight for the framing of this project, and to him I am greatly indebted. The process of developing, clarifying, and revising this dissertation was truly a collective effort. For their help, I thank Danielle LaVaque-Manty, Scott Beal at the Sweetland Center for Writing, my friends and colleagues in the Political Theory Workshop at Michigan, my Fall 2013 Sweetland Dissertation Writing Group, and participants at the "Theory in Black and White" panel at the 2014 Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, and the "Race in North America" panel at the 2014 Meeting of the Western Political Science Association. For their generous financial support for research and travel, I also thank the Department of Political Science at Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Facing Power Clarissa Rile Hayward Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521780799 - De-Facing Power Clarissa Rile Hayward Frontmatter More information De-Facing Power In this major contribution to the power debate, Clarissa Rile Hayward challenges the prevailing view which treats power as something powerful people have and use. Rather than seeing it as having a “face,” she consid- ers power as a complex network of social boundaries – norms, identities, institutions – which define both the field of action and the individual’s freedom within it, for the “powerful” and “powerless” alike. Hayward suggests that the critical analysis of power relations should focus on the ways in which these relationships affect people’s capacities to help shape the institutions and practices that govern their lives. Using a detailed comparative analysis of the relationships within two ethnically diverse educational settings – one in a low-income, predominantly African- American, urban school, the other in an affluent, predominantly white, suburban school – this book develops a compelling account of the concept of power in terms of networks of practices and relations. is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Ohio State University. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521780799 - De-Facing Power Clarissa Rile Hayward Frontmatter More information Contemporary Political Theory Series Editor Ian Shapiro Editorial Board Russell Hardin Stephen Holmes Jeffrey Isaac John Keane Elizabeth Kiss Susan Okin Phillipe Van Parijs Phillip Pettit As the twenty-first century begins, major new political challenges have arisen at the same time as some of the most enduring dilemmas of polit- ical association remain unresolved. The collapse of communism and the end of the Cold War reflect a victory for democratic and liberal values, yet in many of the western countries that nurtured those values there are severe problems of urban decay, class and racial conflict, and failing political legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • CLARISSA RILE HAYWARD Professor of Political Science Washington University One Brookings Drive 207 Seigle Hall St
    CLARISSA RILE HAYWARD Professor of Political Science Washington University One Brookings Drive 207 Seigle Hall St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 [email protected] EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D., With Distinction, Political Science, December, 1998 M.A. and M. Phil, Political Science, June, 1994 Princeton University B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Politics, June, 1988 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Washington University in Saint Louis Professor of Political Science, 2018-present Associate Professor of Political Science, 2007-2018 Affiliated faculty: American Culture Studies, Philosophy, Urban Studies Ohio State University Associate Professor of Political Science, 2006-2007 Assistant Professor of Political Science, 1999-2006 Affiliated faculty: Comparative Studies, Moritz College of Law SELECTED AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS September 2017 – June 2018 Fellow in Residence, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University September 2017 – June 2018 Senior Fellow, Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University May – August 2017 Washington University Summer Faculty Research Grant June 2016 Washington University Center for the Humanities Summer Research Seed Grant 2 November 2015 “Deconstructing Ferguson” Working Group Grant (funded by the MacArthur Foundation and organized through the Yale Law School Justice Collaboratory, Yale ISPS Center for the Study of Inequality, and the Rutgers Graduate School of Education, with Colin Gordon) June 2015 Washington University Center for the Humanities “Divided
    [Show full text]
  • Cvicar (Committee Member), Paul Simon (Committee Member), Laura Tompkins (Committee Member); Becky Tippett (Committee Member)
    CLARISSA RILE HAYWARD Professor of Political Science Co-Lead Editor, American Political Science Review Washington University One Brookings Drive 207 Seigle Hall St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 [email protected] EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D., With Distinction, Political Science, December, 1998 M.A. and M. Phil, Political Science, June, 1994 Princeton University B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Politics, June, 1988 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Washington University in Saint Louis Professor of Political Science, 2018-present Associate Professor of Political Science, 2007-2018 Affiliated faculty: American Culture Studies, Philosophy, Urban Studies Ohio State University Associate Professor of Political Science, 2006-2007 Assistant Professor of Political Science, 1999-2006 Affiliated faculty: Comparative Studies, Moritz College of Law SELECTED AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS September 2017 – June 2018 Fellow in Residence, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University September 2017 – June 2018 Senior Fellow, Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University May – August 2017 Washington University Summer Faculty Research Grant June 2016 Washington University Center for the Humanities Summer Research Seed Grant 2 November 2015 “Deconstructing Ferguson” Working Group Grant (funded by the MacArthur Foundation and organized through the Yale Law School Justice Collaboratory, Yale ISPS Center for the Study of Inequality, and the Rutgers Graduate School of Education, with Colin Gordon) June 2015
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Clarissa Rile Hayward
    CURRICULUM VITAE Clarissa Rile Hayward Washington University in Saint Louis Department of Political Science Campus Box 1063 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 [email protected] EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D., With Distinction, Political Science, December, 1998 M.A. and M. Phil, Political Science, June, 1994 Princeton University B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Politics, June, 1988 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Washington University in Saint Louis Associate Professor of Political Science, 2007- present Affiliated faculty: American Culture Studies, Philosophy, Urban Studies. Ohio State University Associate Professor of Political Science, 2005-2007 Assistant Professor of Political Science, 1999-2005 AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS June, 2016 Washington University Center for the Humanities Summer Research Seed Grant in the amount of $3,125 for proposed project titled “Political Disruption and Structural Change” 2 November, 2015 “Deconstructing Ferguson” Working Group Grant (funded by the MacArthur Foundation and organize through the Yale Law School Justice Collaboratory, Yale ISPS Center for the Study of Inequality, and the Rutgers Graduate School of Education) in the amount of $2000, for “Why Ferguson?” project with Devin Fergus (Ohio State), Colin Gordon (University of Iowa) and Tom Sugrue (NYU) June, 2015 Washington University Center for the Humanities “Divided City” Grant in the amount of $16,000 for “Oral Histories of the Ferguson Movement” project with Jeffrey McCune (Performing Arts and WGSS) and Meredith Evans (Washington University Libraries, Special
    [Show full text]
  • W 10Am-Noon Identity Politics POLI 3294, Spring 2020 T/Th
    Dr. Tamar Malloy [email protected] Ketchum 122 Office hours: W 10am-noon Identity Politics POLI 3294, Spring 2020 T/Th 4:00-5:15, Hellems 241 Course Description Identity politics have taken on a controversial role in contemporary politics. They are celebrated by those who see identity politics as a move towards justice and inclusivity, and demonized by those who see a focus on identity as a divisive and counterproductive dead end. Even as these debates heat up, they are often muddled by popular conceptions of how political identities and identity-based organizing take shape. Together, we will answer the questions at the heart of these popular and academic debates: - What is identity? How is it formed? - How do politics shape identity? - What is the relationship between identity and justice? - When does identity matter in politics? - What are the challenges and opportunities of diverse societies? - How should we respond to identity-based claims from groups and people with historically marginalized identities? - What are identity politics, and how do they shape the current political landscape? This course offers a three-part introduction to the concepts underlying these discussions. Each unit will begin with a case study, which we will return to throughout our discussion of the readings. In the first portion of the course we will explore major modern and contemporary theories about how identities are formed and experienced. In the second part of the course we will focus more specifically on how identity is created and/or shaped by law and policy. In the final part of the course we will consider how (or whether) diversity and democracy can work together.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Clarissa Rile Hayward
    CURRICULUM VITAE Clarissa Rile Hayward Washington University in Saint Louis Department of Political Science Campus Box 1063 One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 (314) 935-5834 [email protected] EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D., With Distinction, Political Science, December, 1998 M.A., Political Science, June, 1994 M. Phil, Political Science, June, 1994 Princeton University B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Politics, June, 1988 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Washington University in Saint Louis Associate Professor of Political Science, 2007- present Director of Graduate Studies, American Culture Studies, 2013 - present Affiliated faculty: American Culture Studies, Philosophy. Ohio State University Associate Professor of Political Science, 2005-2007 Assistant Professor of Political Science, 1999-2005 2 AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS September, 2008 Washington University Center for Human Values Faculty Grant September, 2005 - June 2006 Visiting Member, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey Fellow, National Endowment for the Humanities January, 2004 - January, 2005 National Academy of Education/Spencer Postdoctoral Fellowship 2003 Research Grant, College of Social and Behavioral Science, Ohio State University 2002 Ohio State University, Political Science, Departmental Teaching Award 2001 Ohio State University Office of Research Interdisciplinary Research Seminar Program Grant 1999-2000 Ohio State University Faculty Seed Grant 1998 Nominated for the American Political Science Association’s Leo Strauss Prize for the best dissertation in Political Theory 1994-1995 Yale University Dissertation Fellowship 1993-1994 Yale University Newhouse Fellowship in Writing 1991-1993 Yale University Sterling Fellowship 1989 Rotary International Graduate Fellowship, Buenos Aires, Argentina 3 PUBLICATIONS Books How Americans Make Race: Stories, Institutions, Spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. De-facing Power.
    [Show full text]
  • CLARISSA RILE HAYWARD Professor of Political Science Washington University One Brookings Drive 207 Seigle Hall St
    CLARISSA RILE HAYWARD Professor of Political Science Washington University One Brookings Drive 207 Seigle Hall St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 [email protected] EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D., With Distinction, Political Science, December, 1998 M.A. and M. Phil, Political Science, June, 1994 Princeton University B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Politics, June, 1988 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Washington University in Saint Louis Professor of Political Science, 2018-present Associate Professor of Political Science, 2007-2018 Affiliated faculty: American Culture Studies, Philosophy, Urban Studies Ohio State University Associate Professor of Political Science, 2006-2007 Assistant Professor of Political Science, 1999-2006 Affiliated faculty: Comparative Studies, Moritz College of Law SELECTED AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS September 2017 – June 2018 Fellow in Residence, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University September 2017 – June 2018 Senior Fellow, Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University May – August 2017 Washington University Summer Faculty Research Grant June 2016 Washington University Center for the Humanities Summer Research Seed Grant 2 November 2015 “Deconstructing Ferguson” Working Group Grant (funded by the MacArthur Foundation and organized through the Yale Law School Justice Collaboratory, Yale ISPS Center for the Study of Inequality, and the Rutgers Graduate School of Education, with Colin Gordon) June 2015 Washington University Center for the Humanities “Divided
    [Show full text]