DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Supreme Court of the State of California ______

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Supreme Court of the State of California ______ No. S147999 (Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365) ____________________________________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ____________________________________________________________ IN RE MARRIAGE CASES. ____________________________________________________________ ON APPEAL from the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three Nos. A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652 San Francisco Superior Court Nos. JCCP4365, 429539, 429548, 504038 Los Angeles Superior Court No. BS088506 Hon. Richard A. Kramer, Judge ____________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE EQUALITY FEDERATION and GAY AND LESBIAN ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS (Including Application for Leave to File) ____________________________________________________________ James V. Weixel, Jr. (Bar No. 166024) Susan M. Popik (Bar No. 67173) WEIXEL LAW OFFICE Merri A. Baldwin (Bar No. 141957) 2370 Market Street ● No. 133 CHAPMAN , POPIK & WHITE LLP San Francisco, California 94114 650 California Street, 19th Floor Tel (415) 682-9785 • Fax (866) 640-3918 San Francisco, California 94108 Tel (415) 352-3000 • Fax (415) 352-3030 Of counsel: Mary L. Bonauto Bennett H. Klein Janson Wu GAY AND LESBIAN ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS 30 Winter Street, Suite 800 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Tel (617) 426-1350 • Fax (617) 426-3594 Attorneys for Amici Curiae EQUALITY FEDERATION and GAY AND LESBIAN ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.........................................................................ii APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF AND STATEMENT OF INTEREST ............................................. 1 I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 3 II. ARGUMENT........................................................................................... 6 A. A RULING FROM THIS COURT ENDING THE EXCLUSION OF SAME-SEX COUPLES FROM MARRIAGE WILL ADVANCE PROGRESS TOWARD EQUALITY ELSEWHERE IN THE COUNTRY............................................................................................ 6 1. Today, Civil Unions Are A Position Of Compromise As A Result Of The Remarkable Advances In The Fair Treatment Of Lesbian And Gay Couples Under Law............................................ 6 2. Progress Toward The Fair Treatment of Lesbian And Gay Couples Accelerated After Goodridge ........................................ 12 B. THE ASPIRATION OF LESBIAN AND GAY COUPLES TO ERADICATE THE DISCRIMINATORY EXCLUSION FROM MARRIAGE WOULD BE DRAMATICALLY UNDERCUT BY A DECISION FROM THIS COURT RULING THAT A SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL STATUS CAN STAND UNDER THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ...................................................... 18 1. This Court Should Not Acquiesce To Official Separation Of Citizens Based On Sexual Orientation ............................................... 18 2. California Is A Bellwether For The Nation........................................ 20 III. CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 23 CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL RE WORD COUNT................................ 24 PROOF OF SERVICE ................................................................................ 25 i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Adoption of M.A. (Me. 2007) 2007 ME 123, ___ A.2d ___, 2007 WL 2446019.......................................................................................8 Adoption of Tammy (1993) 416 Mass. 205, 619 N.E.2d 315........................8 Adoptions of B.L.V.B. & E.L.V.B. (1993) 160 Vt. 368, 628 A.2d 1271........8 Baehr v. Lewin (1993) 74 Haw. 530, 852 P.2d 44 ....................................4, 7 Baehr v. Miike (Haw. Cir. Dec. 3, 1996) 1996 WL 694235 .........................7 Baker v. Vermont (1999) 170 Vt. 194, 744 A.2d 864 .......................... passim Godfrey v. Spano (N.Y. Sup. 2007) 15 Misc. 3d 809, 836 N.Y.S.2d 813 ......................................................................................14 Goodridge v. Dep’t of Public Health (2003) 440 Mass. 309, 798 N.E.2d 941................................................................................... passim Holden v. N.J. Dep't of Hum. Servs. (N.J.Super. Ch. Div. 1997) No. C-203-97...............................................................................................8 In re Adoption of R.B.F. (2002) 569 Pa. 269, 803 A.2d 1195.......................8 In re Infant Girl W. (Ind.App. 2006) 845 N.E.2d 229 ..................................8 In re Jacob & In re Dana (1995) 86 N.Y.2d 651, 660 N.E.2d 397, 636 N.Y.S.2d 716.............................................................8 In re M.M.D. & B.H.M. (D.C.App. 1995) 662 A.2d 837..............................8 In re Petition of K.M. & D.M. (1995) 274 Ill.App.3d 189, 653 N.E.2d 888............................................................................................8 Kerrigan v. Dep’t of Public Health (Conn.) No. 17716................................2 Lesbian and Gay Equality Project v. Minister of Home Affairs (Const. Court of S. Africa 2005) [2005] ZACC 20.....................................5 ii Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1..........................................................22 Olmstead v. United States (1928) 277 U.S. 438..........................................22 Perez v. Sharp (1948) 32 Cal. 2d 711 ...............................................9, 21, 22 Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537...........................................3, 18, 19 Reference re Same-Sex Marriage [2004] SCC 79.........................................5 Romer v. Evans (1996) 517 U.S. 620............................................................3 Sharon S. v. Superior Court (2003) 31 Cal.4th 417......................................8 Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976) 17 Cal.3d 425.............................................................................................21 Statutes “An Act Relating to Protecting Individuals in Domestic Partnerships,” Subst. Sen. Bill No. 5336 (60 th Leg., 2007-2008 Reg. Sess.) (Wash.) .....13 1 U.S.C. § 7 .................................................................................................11 28 U.S.C. § 1738C.......................................................................................11 775 Ill. Comp. Stat., 5/1-102 .......................................................................16 Assem. Bill No. 3787 (Dec. 14, 2006, 2006-2007 Reg. Sess.) 18 Leg. Digest 45 (N.J.) ............................................................................13 Civil Code, art. 143, as amended by Law of 13 February 2003 (Belgium)............................................................................................5 Civil Code , art. 30, as amended by Act of 21 December 2000 (Netherlands) ......................................................................................5 Civil Code , art. 44, as amended by Law 13/2005 of 1 July 2005 (Spain) ................................................................................................5 Civil Marriage Act, Bill C-38 (July 20, 2005) (Canada) ..............................5 iii Civil Union Act (Act 17 of 2006) (South Africa)..........................................5 Conn. Gen. Stat., § 46A-81C.......................................................................16 Conn. Gen. Stat., §§ 46b-38nn ....................................................................13 D.C. Code, § 2-1402.11...............................................................................16 Defense of Marriage Act, Pub.L. No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419 (Sept. 21, 1996) .........................................................................................11 Fam. Code, § 297.........................................................................................13 Gov. Code, § 12920.....................................................................................16 Haw. Rev. Stat., § 378-2..............................................................................16 Haw. Rev. Stat., § 572C-1 to C-7................................................................12 Iowa Sen. File No. 427 (82 nd Gen. Assem., 2007 1 st Reg. Sess.)................16 Mass. Gen. Laws, ch.151B, § 4...................................................................16 Md. Code Ann., art. 49B, § 16 ....................................................................16 Me. Rev. Stat. Ann., tit. 5, § 4572...............................................................16 Me. Rev. Stat. Ann., tit. 22, §2710..............................................................13 Minn. Stat., §363A.08 .................................................................................16 N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 354-A:7 .................................................................16 N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 457-A:1 et seq. ......................................................13 N.J. Stat. Ann., § 10:5-12 ............................................................................16 N.J. Stat. Ann., § 37:1-28 ............................................................................13 N.M. Stat., § 28-1-7.....................................................................................16 Nev. Rev. Stat., § 613.330...........................................................................16 iv Oregon Family Fairness Act, House Bill No. 2007 (74 th Leg., 2007 Reg. Sess.)...........................................................13,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statewide Resources for LGBTQ+ Youth
    Statewide resources for LGBTQ+ youth State Organization Phone Address Website GLBT Advocacy & PO Box 3443, Alabama 256-425-7804 http://www.glbtays.org/ Youth Services Huntsville, AL, 35810 336 East 5th Avenue, Alaska Identity, INC 907-929-4528 http://www.identityinc.org/ Anchorage, AK, 99501 1101 N Central Avenue #202, Arizona One-n-Ten 602-475-7456 https://onenten.org/ Phoenix, AZ 85004 NWA Center For 179 N. Church Avenue Suite 101, http://www. Arkansas 479-966-9014 Equality Fayetteville, AR 72701 nwacenterforequality.org/ 2712 Telegraph Avenue, California The Pacific Center 510-548-8283 http://www.pacificcenter.org/ Berkeley, CA 94705 Stonewall Alliance 358 East 6th Street, California 530-893-3336 http://www.stonewallchico.org/ Center Chico, CA 95927 The Rainbow 2118 Willow Pass Road Suite 500, California 925-692-0090 https://www.rainbowcc.org/ Community Center Concord, California 94520 The GLBT PO Box 9798, Colorado Community Center 303-831-0442 http://www.glbtcolorado.org/ Denver, CO 80209 of Colorado 19 River Street, Connecticut Outspoken 203-227-1755 http://www.ctoutspoken.com/ Norwalk, CT 06850 576 Farmington Avenue, Connecticut True Colors 860-232-0050 http://www.ourtruecolors.org/ Hartford, CT 06105 1308 Delaware Avenue, Suite 10, Delaware J.U.S.T. For Youth 302-547-6629 http://www.justforyouthde.org/ Wilmington, DE 19806 2040 N. Dixie Highway, Florida The Pride Center 954-463-9005 http://www.glccsf.org/ Wilton Manors, FL 33305 Orlando Youth PO Box 536944, http://www. Florida 407-244-1222 Alliance Orlando, FL 32853 orlandoyouthalliance.org/ allconnect.com 1 Sunshine Social 1480 SW 9th Avenue, Florida 954-548-4602 http://www.sunserve.org/ Services Fort Lauderdale, FL 33315 The Rainbow 3111 Clairmont Road, Suite B, Georgia 404-457-1721 http://www.chriskids.org/ Program Atlanta, GA 30329 1017 Edgewood Avenue, Georgia YouthPride 404-521-9713 http://www.youthpride.org/ Atlanta, GA 30307 Fierce Youth PO Box 8551, Georgia Reclaiming and 404-532-0022 http://www.fyrerj.org/ Atlanta, GA 31106 Empowering https:// Hawaii LGBT P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening the Door Transgender People National Center for Transgender Equality
    opening the door the opening The National Center for Transgender Equality is a national social justice people transgender of inclusion the to organization devoted to ending discrimination and violence against transgender people through education and advocacy on national issues of importance to transgender people. www.nctequality.org opening the door NATIO to the inclusion of N transgender people AL GAY AL A GAY NATIO N N D The National Gay and Lesbian AL THE NINE KEYS TO MAKING LESBIAN, GAY, L Task Force Policy Institute ESBIA C BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ORGANIZATIONS is a think tank dedicated to E N FULLY TRANSGENDER-INCLUSIVE research, policy analysis and TER N strategy development to advance T ASK FORCE F greater understanding and OR equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual T and transgender people. RA N by Lisa Mottet S G POLICY E and Justin Tanis N DER www.theTaskForce.org IN E QUALITY STITUTE NATIONAL GAY AND LESBIAN TASK FORCE POLICY INSTITUTE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY this page intentionally left blank opening the door to the inclusion of transgender people THE NINE KEYS TO MAKING LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ORGANIZATIONS FULLY TRANSGENDER-INCLUSIVE by Lisa Mottet and Justin Tanis NATIONAL GAY AND LESBIAN TASK FORCE POLICY INSTITUTE National CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY OPENING THE DOOR The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute is a think tank dedicated to research, policy analysis and strategy development to advance greater understanding and equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
    [Show full text]
  • HW 2016 03 TX Letter EHB T
    September 30, 2015 Kevin Counihan Deputy Administrator and Director, Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 Via email: [email protected] Re: 2017 Texas Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Comments: Special Concerns re: Transgender Persons Dear Mr. Counihan: The Texas-based organizations signed onto this letter appreciate the opportunity to comment on proposed Texas Essential Health Benefit (EHB) benchmark for 2017 released on August 28, 2015. We fully endorse the comments submitted by the LGBT State Exchanges Project at the Center for American Progress (Washington, DC) which provide a detailed analysis of concerns about the potentially discriminatory impact of the non-compliant benchmark plans on access to services needed by transgender individuals in Texas and other states. We also fully endorse the comments submitted by Center for Public Policy Priorities (Austin, Texas), which detail fully the multiple shortcomings of Texas’ non-compliant default benchmark plan. Our organizations submit this separate comment letter to underscore our serious concern about the inadequacy of Texas’ EHB benchmark in its potential impact on transgender persons. Texas’ default EHB benchmark contains an exclusion for any services or supplies provided for, in preparation for, or in conjunction with “transsexual surgery.” We also note that Texas’ benchmark plan covers benefits for tests to detect Human Papillomavirus and cervical cancer including a Pap smear only for women age 18 and older. In addition to the arbitrary age limit which may be discriminatory, it is important that CCIIO clarify that these wellness services must be provided to any person with a cervix to be compliant with nondiscrimination requirements in ACA Section 1557 (see CAP comments).
    [Show full text]
  • September 20, 2019 Program Design Branch, Program
    September 20, 2019 Program Design Branch, Program Development Division, Food and Nutrition Service United States Department of Agriculture 3101 Park Center Dr., Alexandria, VA 22302 Re: Notice of Proposed Rule Making -- Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) RIN 0584-AE62 Dear Program Design Branch: The undersigned lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) and allied organizations urge the USDA to withdraw its proposed rule, Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). If implemented, the proposed rule would harm millions of low-income Americans, with particularly negative implications for the LGBTQ community. Since 1996, over forty jurisdictions have implemented a process known as “broad-based categorical eligibility” (BBCE), for households receiving some in-kind services funded through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program. While federal requirements restrict SNAP assistance to households with net incomes under 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL), gross incomes under 130% of the FPL, and in many cases liquid assets below $2,250, the BBCE option gives states flexibility to adjust these thresholds.i Most states have opted to eliminate the asset test and increase the gross income limit (up to 200% of the FPL) for SNAP. In this manner, states can: 1) extend SNAP eligibility to families with gross incomes working their way up the economic ladder but still struggling with high costs for basics, and 2) incentivize families to save by loosening restrictions on assets. Congress has consistently upheld BBCE since its inception, most recently during the 2018 Farm Bill.ii The proposed rule would greatly undercut the scope of BBCE, effectively sidestepping Congress’ bipartisan efforts to maintain the option.
    [Show full text]
  • In 2019, the State of Equality Is: out of Step with Texas Values
    IN 2019, THE STATE OF EQUALITY IS: OUT OF STEP WITH TEXAS VALUES As the 2019 Texas Legislature approaches the mid-point, Equality Texas has surveyed the current state of equality and concluded that urgent legislative action is needed. Public support for equality has never been higher. But from kindergarten to the retirement home, LGBTQ people still experience worse outcomes across nearly every metric and, for many, equality remains stubbornly out of reach. The 86th Texas Legislature must act to remove the antiquated legal barriers that put LGBTQ Texans at a marked disadvantage compared to their neighbors. VISIBILITY & ACCEPTANCE According to an analysis by the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, ​ ​ approximately 930,000 Texans identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and/or queer. If LGBTQ Texans were a city unto themselves, they’d be the 5th most 1 populous municipality in the state, just behind Austin, and significantly larger than El Paso. LGBTQ people are more visible in their communities than ever before: according to a 2017 study, 70% of Americans report that they have a close friend or family ​ member who is gay or lesbian, while the number of Americans who say they personally know someone who is transgender has nearly doubled, from 11% to 21%. Public support for equality is also at an all time high in the state. The Public Religion Research Institute recently analyzed Texans’ attitudes ​ and reported that 64% of Texans support non-discrimination laws for LGBTQ people. That strong support is consistent across political party, religious affiliation, demographic group, and region of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizations Endorsing the Equality Act
    647 ORGANIZATIONS ENDORSING THE EQUALITY ACT National Organizations 9to5, National Association of Working Women Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC A Better Balance Asian American Federation A. Philip Randolph Institute Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance (APALA) ACRIA Association of Flight Attendants – CWA ADAP Advocacy Association Association of Title IX Administrators - ATIXA Advocates for Youth Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists AFGE Athlete Ally AFL-CIO Auburn Seminary African American Ministers In Action Autistic Self Advocacy Network The AIDS Institute Avodah AIDS United BALM Ministries Alan and Leslie Chambers Foundation Bayard Rustin Liberation Initiative American Academy of HIV Medicine Bend the Arc Jewish Action American Academy of Pediatrics Black and Pink American Association for Access, EQuity and Diversity BPFNA ~ Bautistas por la PaZ American Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Brethren Mennonite Council for LGBTQ Interests American Association of University Women (AAUW) Caring Across Generations American Atheists Catholics for Choice American Bar Association Center for American Progress American Civil Liberties Union Center for Black Equity American Conference of Cantors Center for Disability Rights American Counseling Association Center for Inclusivity American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Center for Inquiry Employees (AFSCME) Center for LGBTQ and Gender Studies American Federation of Teachers CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers American Heart Association Central Conference
    [Show full text]
  • NCLR-Annual-Report-2
    national center for lesbian rights 2005 ANNUAL REPORT WWW.NCLRIGHTS.ORG 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 9 9 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 9 1 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 4 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 89 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 9 5 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 9 7 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003“ 2004Since 2005 1977,1977 1978 the1979 1980National 1981 1982 Center1983 1984 1985for 1986Lesbian 1987 1988 Rights 1989 1990 1991 1992 9 3 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 85 1986 1987 1988 1989has 1990 been 1991 at 1992 the 1993 forefront 1994 1995 1996 of 1997nearly 1998 1999every 2000 legal 2001 2002 gain 2003 2004 2005 7 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 9 9 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 9 1 1992 1993 1994won 1995 1996 for 1997 LGBT 1998 1999people 2000 2001and 2002 families.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL CENTER for LESBIAN RIGHTS 870 Market
    Nos. 19-15974, 19-15979 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants-Appellants, ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants-Appellants, BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXUALITY INFORMATION AND EDUCATION COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES (SIECUS), THE LGBT MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT, LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC., GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS, THE HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN, TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER, AND BAY AREA LAWYERS FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES SHANNON MINTER JAMES E. HOUGH JULIANNA GONEN 250 West 55th Street AMY WHELAN New York, NY 10019-9601 JULIE WILENSKY Telephone: (212) 468-8000 NATIONAL CENTER FOR [email protected] LESBIAN RIGHTS ANDRE FONTANA 870 Market Street, Suite 370 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94102 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 392-6257 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 [email protected] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys
    [Show full text]
  • Sign-On Letter Supporting the Dignity for Detained Immigrants
    8/15/2019 Dear Member of Congress, We, the undersigned organizations, write to express our strong support for the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act (H.R. 2415/ S. 1243). As lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) and allied organizations, we recognize the severe danger detention poses to LGBTQ immigrants and the imperative need for increased oversight of detention facilities and the rights of asylum seekers. The Act would protect LGBTQ people from arbitrary detention and violence within facilities and ensure their right to seek protection within the United States. We urge you to protect these basic rights and co-sponsor this critical bill. Current Danger for LGBTQ Immigrants In 2018, Roxsana Hernandez fled to the U.S. from Honduras. As a transgender woman with HIV, Roxsana faced severe threats of violence and persecution in her home country. However, Roxsana did not escape such abuse upon arriving to the U.S. While detained at the border, Roxsana suffered abuse and mistreatment and died from dehydration and complications related to HIV only weeks after arriving.1 Roxsana is not alone. Johana Medina Leon, a 25-year-old trans woman from El Salvador entered US custody on April 1. Despite seeking safety, she was denied medical care and died seven weeks after being detained.2 LGBTQ people are more likely to be and remain detained, regardless of their flight risk or public safety risk. A 2016 Freedom of Information Act request from the Center for American Progress found that DHS detained 88 percent of LGBTQ immigrants who were eligible for release and not subject to mandatory detention, despite expressing fear of being targeted by other detainees and staff members because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.3 This fear is well-founded.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Annual Report Breast Cancer Action
    Breast Cancer Action Annual Report 2003 Coming Together: Moving From Illness to Activism Founded by a group of women who realized the power of community, Breast Cancer Action was born from a need for a grassroots organization with a unique understanding of the political, economic, and social context of breast cancer. Today BCA’s mission is to carry the voices of people affected by breast cancer in order to inspire and compel the changes necessary to end this epidemic. Never straying far from our community-based roots, and with a keen eye toward structural change, BCA organizes people to do something besides worry about breast cancer. 2003 was an extraordinary year for our organization and our movement. We came togeth- er in entirely new ways. New bridges were built. New steps were taken. Bold moves for- ward were made. Our community grew exponentially and our critical messages—that every woman should have access to information and care, that we need true prevention of breast cancer, and that we must develop more effective and less toxic treatments—reached an ever- growing audience. Together we demanded, and ultimately effected, lasting change. Information: The Key to Activism Information is an essential precursor to action. BCA has always been committed to providing accurate, reliable, and honest information about breast cancer. We reach the public through our English- and Spanish-language newsletters, our web site, and a toll-free number. By pro- viding information, BCA both enables people to make informed decisions for themselves and supports their activism. In 2003, we mailed the BCA Newsletter to an expanding list of more than 12,000 individu- als and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ Organizations Unite in Calling for Transformational Change in Policing
    LGBTQ Organizations Unite in Calling for Transformational Change in Policing Black people have been killed, Black people are dying at the hands of police, our country is in crisis, and we all need to take action. We cannot sit on the sidelines, we cannot acquiesce, and we cannot assign responsibility to others. We, as leaders in the LGBTQ movement, must rise up and call for structural change, for divestment of police resources and reinvestment in communities, and for long-term transformational change. Now is the time to take action, and this letter amplifies our strong calls for urgent and immediate action to be taken. Ongoing police brutality and systemic racism have plagued this nation for generations and have been captured on video and laid bare to the public in the United States and around the world. In 2019, more than 1,000 people were killed at the hands of the police.1 We mourn the unacceptable and untimely deaths of Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland, Philando Castile, Eric Garner, Stephon Clark, Freddie Gray, George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Mya Hall, Tony McDade, Rayshard Brooks, and many more who were gone too soon. We have seen with increased frequency the shocking video footage of police brutality. Officers have been recorded instigating violence, screaming obscenities, dragging individuals out of cars, using unnecessary force, holding individuals at gunpoint, and kneeling on peoples’ necks to the desperate plea of “I can’t breathe.” These occurrences are stark reminders of a police system that needs structural changes, deconstruction, and transformation. No one should fear for their lives when they are pulled over by the police.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, First Floor Sacramento, CA 95814
    The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, First Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Thank you for your incredible leadership and seeing our state through the COVID-19 crisis. The bold and decisive actions that you have taken have saved lives and established California as an example of how to meet this moment for the rest of the nation. We wish you, your family and your staff health and safety, especially during these trying times. We write to you as leaders of LGBTQ+ and allied nonprofit organizations in urgent need of financial support in order to survive this crisis. The economic fallout from COVID-19 has upended our budgets by forcing us to cancel fundraising events and preventing us from completing reimbursement-based grant deliverables that require face-to-face interaction and outreach. Meanwhile, many of our generous sponsors and donors have been impacted by the crisis themselves and are no longer in a position to support our work financially. Our work on behalf of the LGBTQ+ community — a community disproportionately at risk of the worst medical, financial, employment, and social impacts of COVID-19 — is imperiled by this crisis and the lack of a targeted comprehensive funding response. LGBTQ+ people already experience greater disparities in health and well-being compared to the general public. These disparities include higher rates of HIV and cancer that can lead to compromised immune systems, higher rates of tobacco use and smoking, barriers to healthcare access and — for the more than three million LGBTQ+ elders living in the United States — widespread social isolation and a hesitancy to reach out to health and other care providers.
    [Show full text]