DOCSLIB.ORG

September 20, 2019 Program Design Branch, Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

September 20, 2019 Program Design Branch, Program Development Division, Food and Nutrition Service United States Department of Agriculture 3101 Park Center Dr., Alexandria, VA 22302 Re: Notice of Proposed Rule Making -- Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) RIN 0584-AE62 Dear Program Design Branch: The undersigned lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) and allied organizations urge the USDA to withdraw its proposed rule, Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). If implemented, the proposed rule would harm millions of low-income Americans, with particularly negative implications for the LGBTQ community. Since 1996, over forty jurisdictions have implemented a process known as “broad-based categorical eligibility” (BBCE), for households receiving some in-kind services funded through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program. While federal requirements restrict SNAP assistance to households with net incomes under 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL), gross incomes under 130% of the FPL, and in many cases liquid assets below $2,250, the BBCE option gives states flexibility to adjust these thresholds.i Most states have opted to eliminate the asset test and increase the gross income limit (up to 200% of the FPL) for SNAP. In this manner, states can: 1) extend SNAP eligibility to families with gross incomes working their way up the economic ladder but still struggling with high costs for basics, and 2) incentivize families to save by loosening restrictions on assets. Congress has consistently upheld BBCE since its inception, most recently during the 2018 Farm Bill.ii The proposed rule would greatly undercut the scope of BBCE, effectively sidestepping Congress’ bipartisan efforts to maintain the option. The Department writes that these revisions would: 1) “define ‘benefits’ for categorical eligibility to mean ongoing and substantial benefits” and 2) “limit the types of non-cash TANF benefits conferring categorical eligibility to those that focus on subsidized employment, work supports and childcare.”iii By placing such stringent restrictions on BBCE, these regulations would primarily impact near-poverty households with incomes or assets marginally above the federal eligibility limits.iv In the preamble to the proposed rule, USDA admitted that its regulatory analysis found that the change would eliminate SNAP benefits for 3.1 million individuals. USDA omitted analysis of the proposed rule’s impact on free school meals, but the proposed rule reportedly would be expected to result in the loss of automatic free school meals for 500,000 children in affected SNAP families.v While these regulations would harm many groups, the LGBTQ community would be hit especially hard. Same-sex couples are substantially more likely to experience poverty than different-sex couples.vi As a result, LGBTQ households are more likely to experience food insecurity than non-LGBTQ households. According to a 2014 Gallup survey, 27% of LGBTQ adults responded affirmatively when asked if they had experienced food insecurity over the past year versus 17% for non-LGBTQ respondents.vii Such disparities are reflected in rates of SNAP participation: 2017 data from the Center for American Progress indicating that LGBTQ people and their families were 2.3 times more likely to participate in SNAP than were non-LGBTQ people, with 22.7% of their nationally-representative LGBTQ survey respondents reporting using SNAP.viii SNAP participation rates were even more disproportionate among LGBTQ people of color, LGBTQ women, and LGBTQ people with disabilities.ix In light of these statistics, it is clear that these proposed regulations will inflict serious and extensive harms on the LGBTQ community. In addition to the negative effects of these proposed regulations, we urge the Department to consider the positive impact of BBCE as it currently stands. First, BBCE substantially simplifies the application process. By eliminating or loosening restrictions on assets, households applying for SNAP through BBCE are not subject to bureaucratic, time-consuming, and administratively inefficient asset tests. According to a report from the Department’s Food and Nutrition Service, while eligible households are legally entitled to receive SNAP benefits “within 30 days of application, […] an unacceptably high percentage of applications are not processed timely.”x In the same report, BBCE was identified by the state of New Mexico as a factor in helping speed up their application processing times.xi Additionally, by simplifying the application process for SNAP benefits, BBCE promotes equal treatment of SNAP beneficiaries by reducing interaction with agency staff, which reduces the opportunity for discrimination against LGBTQ people or other groups. The National Center for Transgender Equality’s 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey found that 17% of respondents whose identity was known by staff at a public assistance or government benefit office reported being “[d]enied equal treatment or service, verbally harassed, or physically attacked” in the office in the past year.xii More generally, a 2017 study by the Center for American Progress found that “25.2 percent of LGBT respondents ha[d] experienced discrimination because of their sexual orientation or gender identity in the past year.”xiii Reducing time spent face-to-face with agency staff reduces the possibility that discrimination could adversely affect LGBTQ applicants. In contrast, the proposed regulations would impose additional asset tests, increasing administrative burdens on states while also placing extra pressure on families who need their benefits as soon as possible. Furthermore, by unnecessarily complicating the application process for many TANF-assisted families, these regulations would require that LGBTQ individuals have more interaction with agency staff members and, consequently, place them at additional risk of discrimination. In short, BBCE is an invaluable help to many struggling families, broadening SNAP eligibility requirements while also streamlining the application process. We oppose the Department’s proposed regulatory changes, which would substantially restrict the breadth of BBCE and undercut the benefits of many SNAP-assisted LGBTQ families. We urge the USDA to protect the millions of families, many of them LGBTQ, who would inevitably be harmed by this proposal. Sincerely AIDS Action Baltimore AIDS Alabama South AIDS Foundation of Chicago Athlete Ally BiNet USA California LGBTQ Health and Human Services Network Cascade AIDS Project CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers Equality California Equality North Carolina EqualityMaine Florida Legal Services, Inc. FreeState Justice GAPIMNY—Empowering Queer & Trans Asian Pacific Islanders GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality Hearts on a Wire Legal Services Staff Association, NOLSW/UAW 2320 Mazzoni Center Meals on Wheels of Central Indiana Moveable Feast Inc. National Association of Social Workers National Center for Lesbian Rights National Equality Action Team (NEAT) National LGBTQ Task Force Oasis Legal Services Positive Women's Network-USA Pride Action Tank Pride Community Services Organization San Francisco AIDS Foundation Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) Silver State Equality-Nevada Southern AIDS Coalition The Global Justice Institute Treatment Action Group (TAG) Union for Reform Judaism Whitman-Walker Health i The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Categorical Eligibility. Congressional Research Service, 4 Jan. 2019, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42054.pdf ii The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Categorical Eligibility. Congressional Research Service, 4 Jan. 2019, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42054.pdf iii Proposed Rule - Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the SNAP. United States Department of Agriculture, 24 July 2019, www.fns.usda.gov/snap/fr-072419. iv Rosenbaum, Dottie. SNAP’s “Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility” Supports Working Families and Those Saving for the Future. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 30 July 2019, https://www.cbpp.org/research/food- assistance/snaps-broad-based-categorical-eligibility-supports-working-families-and. v “Broad-based Categorical Eligibility and School Meals,” FRAC Chat, Food Research & Action Center, 9 August 2019, https://frac.org/blog/broad-based-categorical-eligibility-and-school-meals vi Badgett, M.V. Lee, et al. New Patterns of Poverty in the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Community. Williams Institute, June 2013, https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGB-Poverty-Update-Jun-2013.pdf. vii Brown, Taylor N. T., et al. Food Insecurity and SNAP Participation in the LGBT Community. Williams Institute, July 2016, http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Food-Insecurity-and-SNAP-Participation-in-the- LGBT-Community.pdf. viii Rooney, Caitlin, et al. Protecting Basic Living Standards for LGBTQ People. Center For American Progress, August 2018, https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2018/08/10095627/LGBT-BenefitCuts-report.pdf. ix Ibid. x Timeliness in the SNAP Application Process. Food and Nutrition Service, 2013, https://fns- prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/timeliness_app_process.pdf. xi Ibid. xii James, S.E.. 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality, Dec. 2016, www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/Executive%20Summary%20-%20FINAL%201.6.17.pdf. xiii Singh, Sejal, and Laura E. Durso. “Widespread Discrimination Continues to Shape LGBT People's Lives in Both Subtle and Significant Ways.” Center for American Progress, 2 May 2017, www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbt/news/2017/05/02/429529/widespread-discrimination-continues-shape-lgbt- peoples-lives-subtle-significant-ways/. .
Recommended publications
  • Organizations Endorsing the Equality Act

    Organizations Endorsing the Equality Act

    647 ORGANIZATIONS ENDORSING THE EQUALITY ACT National Organizations 9to5, National Association of Working Women Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC A Better Balance Asian American Federation A. Philip Randolph Institute Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance (APALA) ACRIA Association of Flight Attendants – CWA ADAP Advocacy Association Association of Title IX Administrators - ATIXA Advocates for Youth Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists AFGE Athlete Ally AFL-CIO Auburn Seminary African American Ministers In Action Autistic Self Advocacy Network The AIDS Institute Avodah AIDS United BALM Ministries Alan and Leslie Chambers Foundation Bayard Rustin Liberation Initiative American Academy of HIV Medicine Bend the Arc Jewish Action American Academy of Pediatrics Black and Pink American Association for Access, EQuity and Diversity BPFNA ~ Bautistas por la PaZ American Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Brethren Mennonite Council for LGBTQ Interests American Association of University Women (AAUW) Caring Across Generations American Atheists Catholics for Choice American Bar Association Center for American Progress American Civil Liberties Union Center for Black Equity American Conference of Cantors Center for Disability Rights American Counseling Association Center for Inclusivity American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Center for Inquiry Employees (AFSCME) Center for LGBTQ and Gender Studies American Federation of Teachers CenterLink: The Community of LGBT Centers American Heart Association Central Conference
  • Sign-On Letter Supporting the Dignity for Detained Immigrants

    Sign-On Letter Supporting the Dignity for Detained Immigrants

    8/15/2019 Dear Member of Congress, We, the undersigned organizations, write to express our strong support for the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act (H.R. 2415/ S. 1243). As lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) and allied organizations, we recognize the severe danger detention poses to LGBTQ immigrants and the imperative need for increased oversight of detention facilities and the rights of asylum seekers. The Act would protect LGBTQ people from arbitrary detention and violence within facilities and ensure their right to seek protection within the United States. We urge you to protect these basic rights and co-sponsor this critical bill. Current Danger for LGBTQ Immigrants In 2018, Roxsana Hernandez fled to the U.S. from Honduras. As a transgender woman with HIV, Roxsana faced severe threats of violence and persecution in her home country. However, Roxsana did not escape such abuse upon arriving to the U.S. While detained at the border, Roxsana suffered abuse and mistreatment and died from dehydration and complications related to HIV only weeks after arriving.1 Roxsana is not alone. Johana Medina Leon, a 25-year-old trans woman from El Salvador entered US custody on April 1. Despite seeking safety, she was denied medical care and died seven weeks after being detained.2 LGBTQ people are more likely to be and remain detained, regardless of their flight risk or public safety risk. A 2016 Freedom of Information Act request from the Center for American Progress found that DHS detained 88 percent of LGBTQ immigrants who were eligible for release and not subject to mandatory detention, despite expressing fear of being targeted by other detainees and staff members because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.3 This fear is well-founded.
  • LGBTQ Organizations Unite in Calling for Transformational Change in Policing

    LGBTQ Organizations Unite in Calling for Transformational Change in Policing

    LGBTQ Organizations Unite in Calling for Transformational Change in Policing Black people have been killed, Black people are dying at the hands of police, our country is in crisis, and we all need to take action. We cannot sit on the sidelines, we cannot acquiesce, and we cannot assign responsibility to others. We, as leaders in the LGBTQ movement, must rise up and call for structural change, for divestment of police resources and reinvestment in communities, and for long-term transformational change. Now is the time to take action, and this letter amplifies our strong calls for urgent and immediate action to be taken. Ongoing police brutality and systemic racism have plagued this nation for generations and have been captured on video and laid bare to the public in the United States and around the world. In 2019, more than 1,000 people were killed at the hands of the police.1 We mourn the unacceptable and untimely deaths of Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland, Philando Castile, Eric Garner, Stephon Clark, Freddie Gray, George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Mya Hall, Tony McDade, Rayshard Brooks, and many more who were gone too soon. We have seen with increased frequency the shocking video footage of police brutality. Officers have been recorded instigating violence, screaming obscenities, dragging individuals out of cars, using unnecessary force, holding individuals at gunpoint, and kneeling on peoples’ necks to the desperate plea of “I can’t breathe.” These occurrences are stark reminders of a police system that needs structural changes, deconstruction, and transformation. No one should fear for their lives when they are pulled over by the police.
  • The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, First Floor Sacramento, CA 95814

    The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, First Floor Sacramento, CA 95814

    The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, First Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Thank you for your incredible leadership and seeing our state through the COVID-19 crisis. The bold and decisive actions that you have taken have saved lives and established California as an example of how to meet this moment for the rest of the nation. We wish you, your family and your staff health and safety, especially during these trying times. We write to you as leaders of LGBTQ+ and allied nonprofit organizations in urgent need of financial support in order to survive this crisis. The economic fallout from COVID-19 has upended our budgets by forcing us to cancel fundraising events and preventing us from completing reimbursement-based grant deliverables that require face-to-face interaction and outreach. Meanwhile, many of our generous sponsors and donors have been impacted by the crisis themselves and are no longer in a position to support our work financially. Our work on behalf of the LGBTQ+ community — a community disproportionately at risk of the worst medical, financial, employment, and social impacts of COVID-19 — is imperiled by this crisis and the lack of a targeted comprehensive funding response. LGBTQ+ people already experience greater disparities in health and well-being compared to the general public. These disparities include higher rates of HIV and cancer that can lead to compromised immune systems, higher rates of tobacco use and smoking, barriers to healthcare access and — for the more than three million LGBTQ+ elders living in the United States — widespread social isolation and a hesitancy to reach out to health and other care providers.
  • OPINION and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J

    OPINION and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J

    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, 1569 1570 PERRY v. BROWN HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM, Intervenor-Defendant, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. No. 10-16696 KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; D.C. No. MARK A. JANSSON; 3:09-cv-02292- PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM-YES ON 8, VRW A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; PERRY v. BROWN 1571 LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C.
  • SB 179 (Atkins, Wiener) Cosponsor Fact

    SB 179 (Atkins, Wiener) Cosponsor Fact

    S B 179 – Gender Recognition Act of 2017 Authors: Senator Toni G. Atkins, 39th District & Senator Scott Wiener, 11th District Cosponsors: Equality California, Transgender Law Center In Brief The Solution SB 179 enables more individuals to ensure that SB 179 would make California the first state in their state-issued identity documents accurately the nation to legally recognize nonbinary people reflect their gender by: by creating a third, nonbinary gender marker on California birth certificates, drivers’ licenses, Replacing the requirement to obtain a identity cards, and gender change court orders • physician’s verification with self-attestation; in order to enable intersex, transgender, and Ensuring that applicants seeking a gender nonbinary people to obtain state-issued • change court order need not appear in court identification documents that accurately reflect unless a timely objection has been filed; their gender. SB 179 would also streamline the Creating a process for individuals under the process individuals can use to change their • age of 18 seeking to change their gender gender marker and/or name on state-issued marker; and identification documents. Creating a third gender marker for nonbinary • individuals seeking to change their gender The Issues marker on birth certificates and all other IDs. Individuals seeking to change their gender Background marker and/or name on state-issued identity documents face unnecessary obstacles under current law. The main obstacle is the When gender-related appearance does not requirement that a person must obtain medical match identification documents, intersex, certification that an applicant has received transgender, and nonbinary individuals are appropriate medical treatment during their faced with significant hardships, ranging from gender transition.
  • Until the Work Is Done

    Until the Work Is Done

    UNTIL THE WORK IS DONE Roadmap to Equality Strategic Plan 2019-2024 ROADMAP TO EQUALITY Strategic Plan 2019-2024 Equality California brings the voices of LGBTQ people and allies to institutions of power in California and across the United States, striving to create a world that is healthy, just and fully equal for all LGBTQ people. We advance civil rights and social justice by inspiring, advocating and mobilizing through an inclusive movement that works tirelessly on behalf of those we serve. And we’ll keep doing so, until the work is done. Over the next five years, we’re investing in full-scale growth to turn the nation’s largest statewide LGBTQ civil rights organization into an engine for change primarily focused on California, but with the capacity to engage in our national mission objectives. OUR CORE VALUES Collaboration Deep collaboration and intersectionality to ensure no one gets left behind Commitment Unrelenting commitment to the mission Effectiveness Pragmatic, efficient and effective in achieving LGBTQ goals Fearlessness Indestructible fearlessness in advancing equality Integrity Unquestionable integrity for transparency in the work Inclusiveness Broad inclusiveness to ensure all voices are heard Leadership Development Meaningful leadership development for staff, individuals and organizations to sustain and elevate representation and effectiveness of the LGBTQ community Vision Visionary forward thinking to advance LGBTQ priorities ROADMAP TO EQUALITY: Stategic Plan 2019-2024 - 1.22.19 HERE’S HOW WE GET THERE ∂ Advance Cutting-Edge Legislation Educate, Mobilize & Engage Our Community ∂ Continue to advance LGBTQ civil rights and social justice ∂ Develop a robust, comprehensive communications legislation in California, including legislation to protect strategy to mobilize and engage the community at the the most vulnerable among us.
  • Equality-Act-CJR-And

    Equality-Act-CJR-And

    April 1, 2019 Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives 2141 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Collins, and Committee Members: The undersigned lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) and allied organizations write to express our strong support for the Equality Act (H.R. 5). As LGBTQ and allied organizations, we are particularly eager to discuss how anti-LGBTQ discrimination drives LGBTQ people into poverty and the criminal legal system, as well as discuss the Equality Act’s ability to help address these issues. Employment discrimination is a significant factor contributing to LGBTQ poverty and unemployment rates. Over half of the US population lives in a state without comprehensive, explicit nondiscrimination laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.1 A 2017 Harvard School of Public Health survey found that one in five LGBTQ people reported experiencing discrimination in hiring, pay, and promotions due to their sexual orientation or gender identity.2 Because of discrimination in employment, housing, education, and other areas3, LGBTQ individuals are more likely to be jobless, homeless, and poor than the general population. Additionally, same-sex couples are more likely to experience poverty than different-sex couples4, and the US Transgender Survey found that nearly one-third (29%) of transgender respondents were living in poverty compared to 12% of the general U.S. population.5 This disproportionate rate of poverty is particularly acute for women, people of color, and bisexual people.6 1 Movement Advancement Project, “Non-Discrimination Laws,” last modified March 25, 2019, available at http://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/non discrimination laws.
  • 2016 Department of the Trea^Un Do Not Enter Social Security Numbers on This Form As It May Be Made Public

    2016 Department of the Trea^Un Do Not Enter Social Security Numbers on This Form As It May Be Made Public

    l efile GRAPHIC print - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN:93491264004107 OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF Return of Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation 2016 Department of the Trea^un Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Internal Rev enue Ser ice ► ► Information about Form 990-PF and its instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990pf. For calendar year 2016, or tax year beginning 01-01-2016 , and ending 12-31-2016 Name of foundation DAVID BOHNETT FOUNDATION 95-4735846 Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) 245 SOUTH BEVERLY DRIVE (310) 276-0001 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 C If exemption application is pending, check here q G Check all that apply q Initial return q Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here q ► q Final return q Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach computation ► El El Address change El Name change E If private foundation status was terminated H Check typ e of org anization q Section 501(c)(3) exem p t p rivate foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ► q Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust q Other taxable private foundation I Fair market value of all assets at end J Accounting method q Cash 9 Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination q of year (from Part II, col (c), under section
  • EQUALITY CALIFORNIA Eqca.Org

    EQUALITY CALIFORNIA Eqca.Org

    EQUALITY CALIFORNIA hi March 27, 2018 Board of Directors Mandy Lee U.S. Department of Health and Human Services President Office for Civil Rights Attention: Conscience NPRM, RIN 0945-ZA03 Joseph Gregorich Washington, D.C. 20201 Vice President Scott Malzahn RE: Public Comment in Response to the Proposed Regulation, Protecting Statutory Secretary Conscience Rights in Health Care RIN 0945-ZA03 Laurie Hasencamp To Whom It May Concern: Treasurer On behalf of Equality California and our 800,000 members, we appreciate the Susan McCabe opportunity to submit comments regarding the Department of Health and Human Governance Chair Services (HHS)’s proposed “Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care” rule. Jerry Bloom Equality California is the nation’s largest statewide lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender PAC Chair and queer (LGBTQ) civil rights organization and is dedicated to creating a fair and just Jason Anderson society. We work within California, at the Federal level, and directly with other states to Linda Bernhardt win and protect full equality for LGBTQ people through education, electoral, advocacy Marc Blakeman Susan Burnside and mobilization programs to achieve our mission. Cecilia Cabello Juan Camacho In its request for public comments, HHS stated that the reason for the proposed Andrea Casalett “Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care” rule is “to ensure that persons Jason Daniels Sue Dunlap or entities” who are responsible for patient care “are not subjected to certain practices Boe Hayward or policies that violate conscience, coerce, or discriminate.” Dolores Huerta Deanna Johnston Leslie Katz But the concern of HHS should not lie in helping medical institutions, insurance Andreas Meyer companies and individuals engaged in patient care to cite their “personal beliefs” or Stuart Milk “conscience” in order to facilitate their ability to deny needed services to people of C.
  • OPEN LETTER ABOUT CORONAVIRUS and the LGBTQ+ COMMUNITIES Over 100 Organizations Ask Media & Health Officials to Weigh Adde

    OPEN LETTER ABOUT CORONAVIRUS and the LGBTQ+ COMMUNITIES Over 100 Organizations Ask Media & Health Officials to Weigh Adde

    For Immediate Release March 11, 2020 Contact: Scout, 401-267-8337, [email protected] or ​ ​ Hector Vargas, [email protected]. ​ ​ OPEN LETTER ABOUT CORONAVIRUS AND THE LGBTQ+ COMMUNITIES Over 100 Organizations Ask Media & Health Officials to Weigh Added Risk New York, NY - Over 100 national and local organizations have signed on to an open letter to health and media outlining how COVID-19 may pose an increased risk to the LGBTQ+ population and laying out specific steps to minimize any disparity. “As the media and health communities are pushed into overdrive about COVID-19, we need to make sure the most vulnerable among us are not forgotten. Our smoking rates alone make us extremely vulnerable and our access to care barriers only make a bad situation worse.” notes Dr. Scout, the Deputy Director for the National LGBT Cancer Network, “This letter outlines simple steps to ensure no population is further stigmatized by a virus.” “As an organization dedicated to the health and well-being of LGBTQ communities, we urge LGBTQ individuals to practice measures recommended by public health experts, such as frequent handwashing, to prevent the spread of this virus,” said GLMA President Scott Nass, MD, MPA. “At the same time, like our colleagues who joined the open letter, we call on public health officials to ensure the LGBTQ community is considered and included in the public health response to COVID-19 based on potential risk factors that exist in our community.” The letter was initiated by a coalition of six organizations: the National LGBT Cancer Network; GLMA Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ Equality; Whitman-Walker Health; SAGE; New York Transgender Advocacy Group; and National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance.
  • SLATE of EQUALITY Take This to the Polls with You! the Following Candidates and Ballot Measures Are Endorsed by Equality California

    SLATE of EQUALITY Take This to the Polls with You! the Following Candidates and Ballot Measures Are Endorsed by Equality California

    EQUALITY CALIFORNIA IS PROUD TO ENDORSE General Election TUESDAY NOVEMBER OF th SLATE EQUALITY Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris 8 Take this to the polls with you! PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES U.S. SENATE Prop 60: Lawsuits Against Adult Prop 52: The Medi-Cal Prop 56: CA Healthcare, Film Performers/Distributors - NO Funding and Accountability Research & Prevention Proposition 60 ignores current advances Act - YES Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 - YES in HIV prevention, such as PrEP, and would Proposition 52 would generate over $3 Proposition 56 would help save lives, be harmful to public health by driving film billion annually for Medi-Cal to increase reduce smoking and improve health care production underground or out of state. access to health care, hospital services, for members of the LGBT community and Also opposed by: California Democratic and emergency rooms for those receiving for all Californians. Also supported by: Party, California Republican Party, LA LGBT Medi-Cal services, including the estimated California Democratic Party, California Center, SF AIDS Foundation, AIDS Project Los 250,000 beneficiaries identifying as gay, Medical Association, American Lung lesbian, bisexual, and transgender. Also Angeles, along with many other health and Association, American Heart Association, supported by: California Democratic civil rights organizations. and SF AIDS Foundation. Party, California Medical Association, and California Teachers Association. Equality California’s rigorous endorsement process requires candidates to have a 100% pro-equality rating to be endorsed! PRSRT STD US POSTAGE This advertisement PAID was not authorized or BPS paid for by a candidate for this ofce or a Paid for by Equality committee controlled California PAC by a candidate for this 202 W 1st St., Suite 3-0130 ofce.