CNS Penetration of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib in Non-Tumor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CNS Penetration of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib in Non-Tumor Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2019) 84:447–452 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03864-9 SHORT COMMUNICATION CNS penetration of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib in non‑tumor bearing mice and mice bearing pediatric brain tumors Yogesh T. Patel1,2 · Abigail Davis1 · Suzanne J. Baker3 · Olivia Campagne1 · Clinton F. Stewart1 Received: 22 January 2019 / Accepted: 3 May 2019 / Published online: 11 May 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose Ribociclib, an orally bioavailable small-molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor is currently undergoing evaluation to treat pedi- atric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, it is crucial that it penetrates the brain and tumor. Thus, the objectives of the present study were to derive a clinically relevant mouse dosage for cerebral microdialysis studies, and to characterize ribociclib CNS penetration in non-tumor bearing mice and in mice bearing DIPGx7 (glioma) cortical allograft tumors. Methods A plasma pharmacokinetic study of ribociclib (100 mg/kg, orally) was performed in CD1 nude mice bearing glioma cortical allografts to obtain initial plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and to derive D-optimal plasma sampling time-points for microdialysis studies. Using a cerebral microdialysis technique, the extracellular fuid (ECF) disposition of ribociclib was evaluated after a single oral ribociclib dose (100 mg/kg) in non-tumor bearing mice and in mice bearing glioma cortical allografts. A one-compartment plasma model with absorption and ECF compartments were ft to plasma and ECF concentration–time data using a nonlinear mixed efects modeling approach (NONMEM 7.2). Results The mean unbound ribociclib plasma exposure (6812 ng/ml*h) was similar to that observed clinically at recom- mended dosages in adults. The median ribociclib ECF to plasma partition coefcient (Kp,uu) in non-tumor bearing and glioma mice was 0.10 and 0.07, respectively, and was not statistically diferent (t test, p = 0.19). Conclusions The CNS penetration observed was encouraging enough to move ribociclib forward with preclinical efcacy studies in models of pediatric brain tumors. Keywords Microdialysis · CDK4/6 · Pharmacokinetics · Ribociclib · Pediatrics Introduction some instances, chemotherapy is an important component of therapy. For children less than 3 years old, chemotherapy is Malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors carry a preferentially given to avoid or delay irradiation of the devel- poor prognosis and are the most common solid tumors in oping brain [2]. Because drugs shown active to treat brain children [1]. Surgical resection and radiotherapy have been tumors in adults, such as temozolomide, have not shown the cornerstones of treatment for most brain tumors, but in efcacy in pediatric trials [3], new agents are needed to treat childhood brain tumors. Ribociclib is an orally bioavailable small-molecule inhib- Electronic supplementary material The online version of this itor of both cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0028 0-019-03864 -9) contains currently approved for the treatment of breast cancer [4]. supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. CDK4/6 regulate the mammalian cell-cycle progression * Clinton F. Stewart through G1 phase and initiation of S phase [5]. They respond [email protected] to mitogenic or pro-proliferative stimuli, complex with D-type cyclin, and phosphorylate the retinoblastoma (RB) 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s tumor suppressor protein. This phosphorylation releases RB Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA from E2F transcription factors and enables E2F to transcribe 2 Present Address: Cognigen Corporation, Bufalo, NY, USA the genes that are required for G 1-S phase cell-cycle progres- 3 Department of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude sion and ultimately cell proliferation [5]. Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-2794, USA Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 448 Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2019) 84:447–452 Recent studies of difuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) Ribociclib protein binding in mouse plasma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma tissues have unraveled genetic alterations associated with tumor prolif- A plasma protein binding study of ribociclib was performed eration [6]. These studies reported that ~ 25–30% of these using a rapid equilibrium dialysis procedure. Ribociclib was tumors contain alterations in cell-cycle regulatory genes added to mouse plasma (BioIVT, Westbury, NY) to make such as amplifcation of D-type cyclins and CDK4/6, which fnal concentrations of 500, 1000, 2500, and 5000 ng/mL. are associated with abnormal proliferation [7]. Beside gli- 1 mL of spiked plasma was added to Centrifree® ultrafltra- oma, D-type cyclins and CDK4/6 genes were also found to tion devices [molecular weight cut of: 10 K Daltons; Milli- be amplifed in other pediatric brain tumors highlighting the poreSigma, Darmstadt, Germany]. The plasma samples were clinical potential of CDK4/6 inhibitors such as ribociclib in centrifuged for 30 min at 3600 rpm at 37 °C. The fltrate was this therapeutic area [8]. saved and stored at − 80 °C until analysis. Fraction unbound If ribociclib has adequate CNS exposure (i.e., concentra- of ribociclib in plasma was calculated as ratio of unbound tion vs. time), it could be an important molecularly targeted ribociclib concentration in the fltrate to total ribociclib con- agent to treat childhood brain tumors. Thus, the objectives centration in the plasma sample. of the present study were to derive a clinically equivalent mouse dosage for the cerebral microdialysis studies, to Plasma pharmacokinetic study establish a limited sampling model (LSM) for plasma sam- ple collection during the cerebral microdialysis studies, and CD1 nude mice (n = 9) bearing SJ-DIPGx7 cortical allograft to characterize ribociclib CNS penetration in non-tumor tumors were dosed with 100 mg/kg ribociclib (oral; 10 mg/ bearing mice (i.e., normal blood–brain barrier) and in mice mL) formulated in 0.5% methyl cellulose. Multiple samples bearing DIPGx7 (glioma) cortical allograft tumors. were collected per mouse for up to 24 h post-dose using a population-based study design. Blood samples ( ~ 75 µL) Materials and methods were collected by retro-orbital eye bleed using heparin coated capillary tubes (Fisher Sci, Pittsburgh, PA), except Drugs and chemicals for the terminal sample, which was collected by cardiac stick with a 1 mL heparin pre-coated syringe. Immediately after collection, blood samples were centrifuged, plasma was sep- Ribociclib succinate (purity, > 99%) was provided by arated, and stored at − 80 °C until analysis with an LC–MS/ Novartis Oncology (East Hanover, NJ). Methyl cellu- MS method [9]. lose was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Ribociclib was formulated at concentration of 10 mg/mL in 0.5% w/v methyl cellulose. Acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, Development of pharmacokinetic limited sampling and formic acid were purchased from Fisher Scientifc (Fair modeling for ribociclib Lawn, NJ, USA). All solvents used were HPLC grade. Water was purifed using Milli-Q Advantage A10 system (Milli- During microdialysis, only three plasma samples per mouse pore, Billerica, MA, USA). Mouse plasma (CD1 strain) in could be obtained due to blood sampling volume restric- sodium heparin was purchased from BioIVT (Westbury, NY, tions and plasma volume required for bioanalysis. Thus, USA). Ringer’s solution was purchased from Frey Scientifc a pharmacokinetic LSM was selected to provide the most (Nashua, NH, USA). statistically informative time-points for the plasma sample collection during microdialysis. The LSM was developed Animals and cell lines based on the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from the plasma disposition study, using the D-optimality method Female CD1 nude mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA, implemented in ADAPT 5 (BSMR, Los Angeles, CA, USA). USA) were kept under a controlled environment where temperature, humidity, and 12-h day and night cycles were In vitro probe recovery studies maintained artifcially. One cohort of mice were cortically 6 implanted with 1 × 10 cells of SJ-DIPGx7 (Line 7 passage To assess the dialyzability of ribociclib, the microdialysis 26 with luciferase-YFP marker). Line 7 was established from probe recovery was determined using in vitro recovery stud- a patient autopsy DIPG sample, and carries the H3.3K27M ies as previously described [10]. Specifcally, each probe mutation. All procedures were approved by the St. Jude used for the in vivo microdialysis study was placed in a Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and met the beaker containing a ribociclib solution prepared in Ringer’s guidelines of the Association for Assessment and Accredita- solution at a concentration of 1 µg/mL and maintained at tion of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). 1 3 Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2019) 84:447–452 449 37 °C. The probe was perfused with blank Ringer’s solu- was estimated as a ratio of brain/tumor ECF AUC0–24 h and tion at a fow-rate of 0.5 µL/min. After equilibration for 1 h, plasma AUC0–24 h,u . three consecutive fractions each of 1 h interval were col- lected. Dialysate samples were stored at − 80 °C until fur- ther analysis using a mass spectrometry method developed Results in our laboratory validated for use with Ringer’s solution. Probe recovery was calculated using the ratio of ribociclib Ribociclib plasma protein binding concentration in the dialysate
Recommended publications
  • A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients with Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer
    The TEEL Study: A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients with Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer NCT02586675 Version 12.0 September 14, 2016 TEEL Protocol- Tamoxifen +Ribociclib Page 1 TITLE PAGE The TEEL Study: A Phase I trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in adult patients with advanced ER+ (HER2 negative) breast cancer. Protocol: MCC 18332 Chesapeake IRB Pro00015228 Principal Investigator: Co-Investigators: Statistician: Experimental Therapeutics Program H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center 12902 Magnolia Drive Tampa, FL 33612 & Comprehensive Breast Program Moffitt McKinley Outpatient Center 10920 N. McKinley Dr. Tampa, FL 33612 Study Site Contact: Protocol Version 12 Date: September 14, 2016 TEEL Protocol- Tamoxifen +Ribociclib Page 2 TITLE PAGE .............................................................................................................................................. 1 SYNOPSIS ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Patient Population ................................................................................................................................. 5 Type of Study ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Prior Therapy......................................................................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • PD-1/PD-L1 Targeting in Breast Cancer: the First Clinical Evidences Are Emerging
    Supplementary Materials: PD-1/PD-L1 Targeting in Breast Cancer: the First Clinical Evidences are Emerging. A Literature Review Table S1. Interventional studies with anti PD-1 or PDL-1 agents recruiting. Non-intraveinous administrations are indicated between brackets. Estimated Estimated Study Ph. Anti-PD(L)-1 Single (S) or Combination Study title NCT Conditions or disease Enrollement Sponsor Completion Date (n=) Inflammatory and metastatic breast cancer (IBC) 1 Pembrolizumab S MK-3475 for Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancer (MIBC) 02411656 35 June 2020 MD Anderson or mTNBC Entinostat, Nivolumab, and Ipilimumab in treating patients Breast carcinoma: HER2 negative, Ipilimumab with solid tumors that are metastatic or cannot be removed by Invasive BC, Metastatic BC 1 Entinostat [PO] 02453620 45 December 2019 NCI Nivolumab surgery or locally advanced or metastatic HER2-NegativeBreast BC stage III, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IV Cancer Unresectable solid neoplasm Adjuvant PVX-410 Vaccine and Durvalumab in stage II/III TNBC stage II, III; HLA-A2 positive by Massachusetts 1 Durvalumab PVX-410 [IM] 02826434 20 December 2022 Triple Negative Breast Cancer deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence analysis General Hospit A Study of changes in PD-L1 expression during preoperative Pembrolizumab 1 Nab-paclitaxel treatment with Nab-Paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in Hormone 02999477 HR positive breast cancer 50 January 2023 Dana-Farber Receptor (HR) Positive BC Cisplatine PD1 Antibody + GP as first line treatment for triple negative Fudan 1 JS001 (anti PD1) Gemcitabine
    [Show full text]
  • PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA for APPROVAL Initial Evaluation Target Agent(S) Will Be Approved When ONE of the Following Is Met: 1
    Self-Administered Oncology Agents Through Preferred Prior Authorization Program Summary FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS3-104 Please reference individual agent product labeling. CLINICAL RATIONALE For the purposes of the Self -Administered Oncology Agents criteria, indications deemed appropriate are those approved in FDA labeling and/or supported by NCCN Drugs & Biologics compendia with a category 1 or 2A recommendation, AHFS, or DrugDex with level of evidence of 1 or 2A. SAFETY3-104 Agent(s) Contraindication(s) Afinitor/Afinitor Disperz Hypersensitivity to everolimus, to other rapamycin (everolimus) derivatives None Alecensa (alectinib) Alunbrig (brigatinib) None Ayvakit (avapritinib) None Balversa (erdafitinib) None Hypersensitivity to bosutinib Bosulif (bosutinib) Braftovi (encorafenib) None Brukinsa (zanubrutinib) None Cabometyx None (cabozantinib) Calquence None (acalabrutinib) Caprelsa Congenital long QT syndrome (vandetanib) Cometriq None (cabozantinib) Copiktra (duvelisib) None Cotellic (cobimetinib) None Daurismo (glasdegib) None None Erivedge (vismodegib) Erleada (apalutamide) Pregnancy None Farydak (panobinostat) Fotivda (tivozanib) None Gavreto (pralsetinib) None None Gilotrif (afatinib) Gleevec None (imatinib) Hycamtin Severe hypersensitivity to topotecan (topotecan) None Ibrance (palbociclib) KS_PS_SA_Oncology_PA_ProgSum_AR1020_r0821v2 Page 1 of 19 © Copyright Prime Therapeutics LLC. 08/2021 All Rights Reserved Effective: 10/01/2021 Agent(s) Contraindication(s) None Iclusig (ponatinib) Idhifa (enasidenib) None Imbruvica (ibrutinib)
    [Show full text]
  • BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021
    Page 1 of 65 BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021 DEFINITIONS Class I Reimbursed for active cancer or approved treatment or approved indication only. Reimbursed for approved indications only. Completion of the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Application (formerly Undesignated Indication Form) is necessary to Restricted Funding (R) provide the appropriate clinical information for each patient. NOTES 1. BC Cancer will reimburse, to the Communities Oncology Network hospital pharmacy, the actual acquisition cost of a Benefit Drug, up to the maximum price as determined by BC Cancer, based on the current brand and contract price. Please contact the OSCAR Hotline at 1-888-355-0355 if more information is required. 2. Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) code only applicable to Class I drugs where indicated. 3. Intrahepatic use of chemotherapy drugs is not reimbursable unless specified. 4. For queries regarding other indications not specified, please contact the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Office at 604.877.6000 x 6277 or [email protected] DOSAGE TUMOUR PROTOCOL DRUG APPROVED INDICATIONS CLASS NOTES FORM SITE CODES Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer using abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUMCSPABI* R Abiraterone and Prednisone Palliative Therapy for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUPABI R Using Abiraterone and prednisone acitretin capsule Lymphoma reversal of early dysplastic and neoplastic stem changes LYNOS I first-line treatment of epidermal
    [Show full text]
  • New Drug Update: the Next Step in Personalized Medicine
    New Drug Update: The Next Step in Personalized Medicine Jordan Hill, PharmD, BCOP Clinical Pharmacy Specialist WVU Medicine Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center Objectives • Review indications for new FDA approved anti- neoplastic medications in 2017 • Outline place in therapy of new medications • Become familiar with mechanisms of action of new medications • Describe adverse effects associated with new medications • Summarize dosing schemes and appropriate dose reductions for new medications First-in-Class Approvals • FLT3 inhibitor – midostaurin • IDH2 inhibitor – enasidenib • Anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate – inotuzumab ozogamicin • CAR T-cell therapy - tisagenlecleucel “Me-too” Approvals • CDK 4/6 inhibitor – ribociclib and abemaciclib • PD-L1 inhibitors • Avelumab • Durvalumab • PARP inhibitor – niraparib • ALK inhibitor – brigatinib • Pan-HER inhibitor – neratinib • Liposome-encapsulated combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine • PI3K inhibitor – copanlisib Drugs by Malignancy AML Breast Bladder ALL FL Lung Ovarian 0 1 2 3 Oral versus IV 46% 54% Oral IV FIRST-IN CLASS FLT3 Inhibitor - midostaurin Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2017;10:93 Midostaurin (Rydapt®) • 717 newly diagnosed FLT3+ AML Patients • Induction and consolidation chemotherapy and placebo maintenance versus chemotherapy + midostaurin and Treatment maintenance midostaurin • OS: 74.7 mo versus 25.6 mo (P=0.009) Efficacy • EFS: 8.2 mo versus 3.0 mo (P=0.002) • Higher grade > 3 anemia, rash, and nausea Safety N Engl J Med 2017;377:454-64 Midostaurin (Rydapt®) • Approved indications: FLT3+ AML, mast cell leukemia, systemic mastocytosis • AML dose: 50 mg twice daily with food on days 8-21 • Of each induction cycle (+ daunorubicin and cytarabine) • Of each consolidation cycle (+ high dose cytarabine) • ADEs: nausea, myelosuppression, mucositis, increases in LFTs, amylase/lipase, and electrolyte abnormalities • Pharmacokinetics: hepatic metabolism, substrate of CYP 3A4; < 5% excretion in urine RYDAPT (midostaurin) [package insert].
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Huateng Pharma https://en.huatengsci.com A Novel Treatment For Triple-negative Breast Cancer Triple-negative breast cancer is a cancer that tests negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and excess HER2 protein. These results mean the growth of the cancer is not fueled by the hormones estrogen and progesterone, or by the HER2 protein. So, triple-negative breast cancer does not respond to hormonal therapy medicines or medicines that target HER2 protein receptors. This type of breast cancer accounts for 10-20% of all types of breast cancer. It has special biological behavior and clinicopathological characteristics, and the prognosis is worse than other types. For doctors and researchers, there is intense interest in finding new medications that can treat this kind of breast cancer. Photodynamic therapy is a novel method for the treatment of breast cancer. By combining a photosensitizer with a corresponding light source, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated to selectively destroy the diseased tissues, so as to kill the cancer cells. But at the same time it will also lead to the formation of hypoxia in tumor tissues and reduce the therapeutic effect. Recently, the team of Professor Jin Hongjun from the Molecular Imaging Center of Sun Yat-sen University No.5 Hospital and the Tumor Center of Sun Yat-sen University No.5 Hospital explored a novel method to improve hypoxia in photodynamic therapy, and Huateng Pharma https://en.huatengsci.com preliminarily found that oxyphotodynamic therapy combined with metformin has the potential to treat triple-negative breast cancer. The research was published in the Annals of Translational Medicine (ATM,IF:3.297).
    [Show full text]
  • Ribociclib (LEE011)
    Clinical Development Ribociclib (LEE011) Oncology Clinical Protocol CLEE011G2301 (EarLEE-1) / NCT03078751 An open label, multi-center protocol for U.S. patients enrolled in a study of ribociclib with endocrine therapy as an adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2- negative, high risk early breast cancer Authors Document type Amended Protocol Version EUDRACT number 2014-001795-53 Version number 02 (Clean) Development phase II Document status Final Release date 17-Apr-2018 Property of Novartis Confidential May not be used, divulged, published or otherwise disclosed without the consent of Novartis Template version 22-Jul-2016 Novartis Confidential Page 2 Amended Protocol Version 02 (Clean) Protocol No. CLEE011G2301 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables ........................................................................................................................ 5 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 6 Glossary of terms ................................................................................................................. 9 Protocol summary .............................................................................................................. 10 Amendment 2 (17-Apr-2018) ............................................................................................ 14
    [Show full text]
  • Self Administered Oncology Agents Prior Authorization with Quantity
    Self Administered Oncology Agents Prior Authorization with Quantity Limit Program Summary BCBSAL does not have the preferred product option. This program applies to Commercial, NetResults A series, SourceRx, and Health Insurance Marketplace formularies. OBJECTIVE The intent of the Self Administered Oncology Agents Prior Authorization (PA) program is to ensure appropriate selection of patients for treatment according to product labeling and/or clinical studies and/or clinical guidelines. The criteria considers appropriate indications as those supported in FDA approved labeling, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) with level of evidence 1 or 2A recommendation, AHFS, or Drugdex with level of evidence of 1 or IIa. TARGET DRUGS Afinitor® (everolimus) Nerlynx™ (neratinib) Afinitor® Disperz (everolimus) Nexavar® (sorafenib) Alecensa® (alectinib) Ninlaro® (ixazomib) Alunbrig™ (brigatinib) Odomzo® (sonidegib) Bosulif® (bosutinib) Pomalyst® (pomalidomide) Cabometyx™ (cabozantinib) Revlimid® (lenalidomide) Calquence® (acalabrutinib) RubracaTM (rucaparib) Caprelsa® (vandetanib) Rydapt® (midostaurin) Cometriq™ (cabozantinib) Sprycel® (dasatinib) CotellicTM (cobimetinib) Stivarga® (regorafenib) Erivedge™ (vismodegib) Sutent® (sunitinib) Erleada™ (apalutamide) Sylatron® (peginterferon alfa-2b) Farydak® (panobinostat) Tafinlar® (dabrafenib) Gilotrif® (afatinib) TagrissoTM (osimertinib) Gleevec® (imatinib)a Tarceva® (erlotinib) Hexalen® (altretamine) Targretin® (bexarotene)a Hycamtin® (topotecan) Tasigna® (nilotinib) Ibrance® (palbociclib) Temodar®
    [Show full text]
  • Ivy Brain Tumor Center and Sonalasense to Test Novel Drug-Device Combination for Glioblastoma
    Ivy Brain Tumor Center and SonALAsense to Test Novel Drug-Device Combination for Glioblastoma First-in-human clinical trial will determine effectiveness of promising, non-invasive therapy for brain cancer (PHOENIX, Ariz. – Nov. 21, 2019) – The Ivy Brain Tumor Center at the Barrow Neurological Institute, today announced a strategic collaboration with SonALAsense to develop and test a new, non-invasive drug-device combination, sonodynamic therapy (SDT), for recurrent glioblastoma through a Phase 0/2 clinical trial. Details of the study, as well as the results of two other clinical trials will be announced by Dr. Nader Sanai, director of the Ivy Brain Tumor Center, at the 2019 Society of Neuro-Oncology Annual Meeting (SNO) in Phoenix, Ariz. on Nov. 22. SonALAsense Phase 0/2 Clinical Trial SonALAsense, in conjunction with the Ivy Brain Tumor Center, is collaborating with Insightec®, the innovator of Magnetic Resonance-Guided focused ultrasound (MRFUS) to adapt its technology for use at non-thermal energy levels in combination with SonALAsense’s proprietary formulation of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) for glioblastoma. By adapting the Ivy Center’s Phase 0/2 clinical trial model, SonALAsense’s ALA drug will be administered intravenously, metabolized exclusively by glioblastoma cells, and accumulated as a fluorescent metabolite protoporphyrin IX. This tumor metabolite is then stereotactically activated using Insightec’s MR-guided focused ultrasound which results in reactive oxygen species that are lethal to every tumor cell. This combination of metabolic targeting by ALA and activation by non-invasive focused ultrasound represents an innovative potential new therapeutic modality for glioblastoma patients. This novel technology is called ALA sonodynamic therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Targeting of CDK4/6 and BCL2 Pathways Augments Tumor Response in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer James R
    Published OnlineFirst April 3, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1872 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH | TRANSLATIONAL CANCER MECHANISMS AND THERAPY Dual Targeting of CDK4/6 and BCL2 Pathways Augments Tumor Response in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer James R. Whittle1,2,3, Francois¸ Vaillant1,3, Elliot Surgenor1, Antonia N. Policheni3,4,Goknur€ Giner3,5, Bianca D. Capaldo1,3, Huei-Rong Chen1,HeK.Liu1, Johanna F. Dekkers1,6,7, Norman Sachs6, Hans Clevers6,7, Andrew Fellowes8, Thomas Green8, Huiling Xu8, Stephen B. Fox8,9, Marco J. Herold3,10, Gordon K. Smyth5,11, Daniel H.D. Gray3,4, Jane E. Visvader1,3, and Geoffrey J. Lindeman1,2,12 ABSTRACT ◥ Purpose: Although cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) Results: Triple therapy was well tolerated and produced a super- inhibitors significantly extend tumor response in patients with ior and more durable tumor response compared with single or þ metastatic estrogen receptor–positive (ER ) breast cancer, relapse doublet therapy. This was associated with marked apoptosis, includ- is almost inevitable. This may, in part, reflect the failure of CDK4/6 ing of senescent cells, indicative of senolysis. Unexpectedly, ABT- – inhibitors to induce apoptotic cell death. We therefore evaluated 199 resulted in Rb dephosphorylation and reduced G1 S cyclins, combination therapy with ABT-199 (venetoclax), a potent and most notably at high doses, thereby intensifying the fulvestrant/ selective BCL2 inhibitor. palbociclib–induced cell-cycle arrest. Interestingly, a CRISPR/Cas9 Experimental Design: BCL2 family member expression was screen suggested that ABT-199 could mitigate loss of Rb (and assessed following treatment with endocrine therapy and the potentially other mechanisms of acquired resistance) to palbociclib.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Progression Free Survival in the Approval Process and European HTA Assessments
    Role of progression free survival in the approval process and European HTA assessments Kirchmann T, Deichmann A, Schönermark MP SKC Beratungsgesellschaft mbH, Hannover, Germany Objectives Methods Most cancers are characterized by a progressive course of disease, ultimately leading to the death of the patients. • Guidelines of regulatory and HTA agencies were reviewed in terms of the acceptance and value of PFS within the Thus, in the medical world, prevention of the disease progress, measured by progression free survival (PFS), is approval or reimbursement assessments. considered a core parameter with a clear patient relevant benefit. This is reflected in a large fraction of clinical • Ribociclib and Palbociclib in the indication breast cancer as well as Olaparib and Niraparib for the treatment of studies in cancer in which PFS serves as the primary endpoint, and thus determines the success of the treatment. ovarian cancer were selected for in-depth analysis. While the European Medicines Agency (EMA) considers PFS to be an important factor in assessing the efficacy of a new drug, HTA agencies such as G-BA, NICE and HAS are divided. The aim of this research is to analyze previous and • For all four active substances, published HTA documents of G-BA, HAS and NICE were reviewed for the specific current assessments of PFS by European HTA agencies and to compare them to the assessment by EMA. role of PFS and were compared to the CHMP decisions and EPARs. Results Relevance of PFS in the approval decision Relevance of PFS in the reimbursement decision Europe (EMA)1 USA (FDA) 2 Germany (G-BA) 3 UK (NICE) 4 France (HAS) 5 • Acceptable primary endpoints include • The role of PFS as an endpoint to support • Patient-relevant parameters to determine • The evaluation of effectiveness requires • [The benefit] represents the amount of cure rate, OS and PFS/DFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Oncology Criteria C16154-A
    Prior Authorization Criteria Standard Oncology Criteria Policy Number: C16154-A CRITERIA EFFECTIVE DATES: ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE LAST REVIEWED DATE NEXT REVIEW DATE DUE BEFORE 03/2016 12/2/2020 1/26/2022 HCPCS CODING TYPE OF CRITERIA LAST P&T APPROVAL/VERSION N/A RxPA Q1 2021 20210127C16154-A PRODUCTS AFFECTED: See dosage forms DRUG CLASS: Antineoplastic ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Variable per drug PLACE OF SERVICE: Retail Pharmacy, Specialty Pharmacy, Buy and Bill- please refer to specialty pharmacy list by drug AVAILABLE DOSAGE FORMS: Abraxane (paclitaxel protein-bound) Cabometyx (cabozantinib) Erwinaze (asparaginase) Actimmune (interferon gamma-1b) Calquence (acalbrutinib) Erwinia (chrysantemi) Adriamycin (doxorubicin) Campath (alemtuzumab) Ethyol (amifostine) Adrucil (fluorouracil) Camptosar (irinotecan) Etopophos (etoposide phosphate) Afinitor (everolimus) Caprelsa (vandetanib) Evomela (melphalan) Alecensa (alectinib) Casodex (bicalutamide) Fareston (toremifene) Alimta (pemetrexed disodium) Cerubidine (danorubicin) Farydak (panbinostat) Aliqopa (copanlisib) Clolar (clofarabine) Faslodex (fulvestrant) Alkeran (melphalan) Cometriq (cabozantinib) Femara (letrozole) Alunbrig (brigatinib) Copiktra (duvelisib) Firmagon (degarelix) Arimidex (anastrozole) Cosmegen (dactinomycin) Floxuridine Aromasin (exemestane) Cotellic (cobimetinib) Fludara (fludarbine) Arranon (nelarabine) Cyramza (ramucirumab) Folotyn (pralatrexate) Arzerra (ofatumumab) Cytosar-U (cytarabine) Fusilev (levoleucovorin) Asparlas (calaspargase pegol-mknl Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide)
    [Show full text]