Addressing Challenges in Access to Oncology Medicines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Addressing Challenges in Access to Oncology Medicines Addressing Challenges in Access to Oncology Medicines Analytical Report ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO ONCOLOGY MEDICINES Analytical Report 2 Acknowledgements This analytical report was prepared by the Health Division, OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. The OECD Health Division would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions from the OECD Expert Group on Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices. Writing this report would not have been possible without the contribution of experts from the OECD and EU countries. The authors are also grateful to various members of the Expert Group for input to the research for this paper as well as review of prior drafts. This paper benefited from review and feedback by Ruth Lopert and Francesca Colombo at the OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. Prior versions of this paper were reviewed by colleagues at the European Commission. This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union under The Third Health Programme 2014-2020. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the OECD and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD member countries or EU Member States. ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO ONCOLOGY MEDICINES © OECD 2020 3 Table of contents Acknowledgements 2 List of acronyms and abbreviations 5 Country abbreviations 7 Executive summary 8 1 Introduction 11 2 Country approaches to challenges in oncology medicines 14 2.1 Mitigating increasing uncertainty in the assessment of clinical benefit 14 2.2 Managing the ‘cascade’ of indications 21 2.3 Managing place in therapy and pricing combination regimens 25 2.4 Managing increasing treatment costs within budget constraints 30 3 Access to oncology medicines in OECD/EU countries 40 3.1 Access is multi-dimensional 40 3.2 Measuring access to oncology medicines 41 3.3 Access to oncology medicines remains unequal across OECD/EU countries 46 3.4 Time to access for new oncology products/indications varies across OECD/EU countries 50 3.5 Countries report inequities in access and difficulties in meeting patient expectations 58 3.6 Cost-sharing and medicine prices affect affordability 61 4 Conclusions 67 References 70 Annex A. OECD data collection 78 Expert interviews and survey 78 Workshop 82 Annex B. OECD access survey – limitations and country-specific caveats 83 Annex C. OECD access survey – indication-specific results 86 Annex D. OECD survey – cost sharing requirements 93 Tables Table 1.1. Summary of challenges identified in managing oncology medicines 12 Table 2.1. Pricing products with multiple indications in OECD/EU countries 22 Table 2.2. Price change likely to occur following approval and coverage of a new indication of an existing product in OECD/EU countries 23 ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO ONCOLOGY MEDICINES © OECD 2020 4 Table 2.3. Management of off-label use of oncology medicines in OECD/EU countries 25 Table 2.4. Approaches to attributing value to constituents of combination regimens in OECD/EU countries 29 Table 3.1. ESMO-MCBS Treatment Scores 43 Table 3.2. Time between first marketing authorisation and marketing authorisation in subsequent countries/regions for product/indications approved since 2014 (n=31 pairs) 51 Table 3.3. Time between first marketing authorisation and granting of coverage in subsequent OECD/EU countries for product/indications approved since 2014 (n=31 pairs) 53 Table 3.4. Level of coverage decision making across OECD/EU countries 59 Table A A.1. Responses to OECD survey 78 Table A A.2. Final product/indication sample for OECD access survey 80 Table A B.1. Country-specific caveats 83 Table A C.1. Regulatory approval and coverage status of medicines for metastatic breast cancer 87 Table A C.2. Regulatory approval and coverage status of medicines for non-small cell lung cancer 88 Table A C.3. Regulatory approval and coverage status of medicines for colorectal cancer 89 Table A C.4. Regulatory approval and coverage status of medicines for melanoma 90 Table A C.5. Regulatory approval and coverage status of medicines for multiple myeloma 91 Table A C.6. Regulatory approval and coverage status of medicines used as supportive care 92 Table A D.1. Patient cost-sharing requirements for oncology medicines and medical services potentially including the administration of an oncology medicine 93 Figures Figure 2.1. Policies and approaches to address uncertainty in coverage and/or pricing decisions across OECD/EU countries 20 Figure 2.2. Approaches to determining place in therapy of new drugs across OECD/EU countries 26 Figure 2.3. Setting prices of products used in combination regimens 28 Figure 2.4. Trends in the number of oncology medicines approved and their prices 31 Figure 2.5. Comparisons of sales and expenditures per capita for oncology medicines in Italy 33 Figure 2.6. Trends in pharmaceutical expenditure 34 Figure 2.7. The role of the Cancer Drugs Fund in the English National Health System 36 Figure 2.8. Percentage of products reported as no longer protected from competition, by number of generics/biosimilars available across OECD/EU countries 38 Figure 3.1. Time to access as measured in this study 46 Figure 3.2. Percentage of sample product/indication pairs by approval and coverage status across OECD/EU countries 47 Figure 3.3. Time between approval and coverage dates across OECD/EU countries 57 Figure 3.4. Cost-sharing for oncology pharmaceuticals dispensed to patients for self-administration in OECD/EU countries 63 Figure 3.5. Cost-sharing for outpatient specialist cancer care services including the administration of a medicine in OECD/EU countries 64 Figure 3.6. Cost-sharing for hospital inpatient care for cancer including the administration of a medicine in OECD/EU countries 64 Boxes Box 2.1. Medicines approved with pan-tumour indications 17 Box 2.2. Existing international collaboration initiatives 21 Box 2.3. Criteria used to determine eligibility for funding through Italy’s Fund for Innovative Medicines in Oncology 36 Box 3.1. ESMO – Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) 43 Box 3.2. Types of user charges or cost-sharing requirements - definitions 62 ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO ONCOLOGY MEDICINES © OECD 2020 5 List of acronyms and abbreviations ABPI Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry AIFA Italian Medicines Agency ASCO American Society of Clinical Oncology ASP Average sales price ATC Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification ATMP Advanced therapy medicinal products CADTH Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health CAR-T Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy CDF Cancer Drugs Fund (England) CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (United States) CTLA-4 Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 DDD Defined daily dose DHSC Department of Health & Social Care (England) dMMR Deficient mismatch repair DRG Diagnosis related group EBP Evidence Building Program (Canada) ECL European Cancer Leagues EEA European Economic Area EFPIA European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor EMA European Medicines Agency EML Essential Medicines List (i.e. 21st WHO Model List of Essential Medicines) EOPYY National Organization for the Provision of Health Services (Greece) ESMO European Society for Medical Oncology ESMO-MCBS European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale EU European Union EUnetHTA European Network for Health Technology Assessment Euripid European Integrated Price Information Database FDA Food and Drug Administration (United States) GDP Gross domestic product GP General practitioner ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO ONCOLOGY MEDICINES © OECD 2020 6 GRADE Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation HAS Haute Autorité de Santé (France) HER-2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 HIV Human immunodeficiency virus HTA Health Technology Assessment HTAi Health Technology Assessment International IBP Indication-based pricing INCa French National Cancer Institute MEA Managed entry agreement MfE Medicines for Europe MOH Ministry of Health MSI-H Microsatellite instability-high NHS National Health Service NHSE-I National Health Service England & Improvement NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NoMA Norwegian Medicines Agency NTRK Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase OOP Out-of-pocket payments PBAC Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (Australia) PBS Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Australia) pCODR pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review PD-1 Programmed cell death protein 1 PD-L1 Programmed cell death ligand 1 PMPRB Patented Medicine Prices Review Board PPRI Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information network QALY Quality-adjusted life year RCT Randomised controlled trial RWD Real world data TKI Tyrosine kinase inhibitor TLV Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (Sweden) WHO World Health Organization WHOCC WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology WTP Willingness to pay ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ACCESS TO ONCOLOGY MEDICINES © OECD 2020 7 Country abbreviations AUS Australia BEL Belgium CAN Canada CHE Switzerland CHL Chile CYP Cyprus1 CZE Czech Republic DEU Germany DNK Denmark EST Estonia FRA France GBR United Kingdom (England only) GRC Greece HUN Hungary IRL Ireland ISR Israel ITA Italy JPN Japan KOR Korea LTU Lithuania LVA Latvia MLT Malta NOR Norway SWE Sweden USA United States 1 Note by Turkey: The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island.
Recommended publications
  • A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients with Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer
    The TEEL Study: A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients with Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer NCT02586675 Version 12.0 September 14, 2016 TEEL Protocol- Tamoxifen +Ribociclib Page 1 TITLE PAGE The TEEL Study: A Phase I trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in adult patients with advanced ER+ (HER2 negative) breast cancer. Protocol: MCC 18332 Chesapeake IRB Pro00015228 Principal Investigator: Co-Investigators: Statistician: Experimental Therapeutics Program H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center 12902 Magnolia Drive Tampa, FL 33612 & Comprehensive Breast Program Moffitt McKinley Outpatient Center 10920 N. McKinley Dr. Tampa, FL 33612 Study Site Contact: Protocol Version 12 Date: September 14, 2016 TEEL Protocol- Tamoxifen +Ribociclib Page 2 TITLE PAGE .............................................................................................................................................. 1 SYNOPSIS ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Patient Population ................................................................................................................................. 5 Type of Study ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Prior Therapy......................................................................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • PD-1/PD-L1 Targeting in Breast Cancer: the First Clinical Evidences Are Emerging
    Supplementary Materials: PD-1/PD-L1 Targeting in Breast Cancer: the First Clinical Evidences are Emerging. A Literature Review Table S1. Interventional studies with anti PD-1 or PDL-1 agents recruiting. Non-intraveinous administrations are indicated between brackets. Estimated Estimated Study Ph. Anti-PD(L)-1 Single (S) or Combination Study title NCT Conditions or disease Enrollement Sponsor Completion Date (n=) Inflammatory and metastatic breast cancer (IBC) 1 Pembrolizumab S MK-3475 for Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancer (MIBC) 02411656 35 June 2020 MD Anderson or mTNBC Entinostat, Nivolumab, and Ipilimumab in treating patients Breast carcinoma: HER2 negative, Ipilimumab with solid tumors that are metastatic or cannot be removed by Invasive BC, Metastatic BC 1 Entinostat [PO] 02453620 45 December 2019 NCI Nivolumab surgery or locally advanced or metastatic HER2-NegativeBreast BC stage III, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IV Cancer Unresectable solid neoplasm Adjuvant PVX-410 Vaccine and Durvalumab in stage II/III TNBC stage II, III; HLA-A2 positive by Massachusetts 1 Durvalumab PVX-410 [IM] 02826434 20 December 2022 Triple Negative Breast Cancer deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence analysis General Hospit A Study of changes in PD-L1 expression during preoperative Pembrolizumab 1 Nab-paclitaxel treatment with Nab-Paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in Hormone 02999477 HR positive breast cancer 50 January 2023 Dana-Farber Receptor (HR) Positive BC Cisplatine PD1 Antibody + GP as first line treatment for triple negative Fudan 1 JS001 (anti PD1) Gemcitabine
    [Show full text]
  • PRIOR AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA for APPROVAL Initial Evaluation Target Agent(S) Will Be Approved When ONE of the Following Is Met: 1
    Self-Administered Oncology Agents Through Preferred Prior Authorization Program Summary FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS3-104 Please reference individual agent product labeling. CLINICAL RATIONALE For the purposes of the Self -Administered Oncology Agents criteria, indications deemed appropriate are those approved in FDA labeling and/or supported by NCCN Drugs & Biologics compendia with a category 1 or 2A recommendation, AHFS, or DrugDex with level of evidence of 1 or 2A. SAFETY3-104 Agent(s) Contraindication(s) Afinitor/Afinitor Disperz Hypersensitivity to everolimus, to other rapamycin (everolimus) derivatives None Alecensa (alectinib) Alunbrig (brigatinib) None Ayvakit (avapritinib) None Balversa (erdafitinib) None Hypersensitivity to bosutinib Bosulif (bosutinib) Braftovi (encorafenib) None Brukinsa (zanubrutinib) None Cabometyx None (cabozantinib) Calquence None (acalabrutinib) Caprelsa Congenital long QT syndrome (vandetanib) Cometriq None (cabozantinib) Copiktra (duvelisib) None Cotellic (cobimetinib) None Daurismo (glasdegib) None None Erivedge (vismodegib) Erleada (apalutamide) Pregnancy None Farydak (panobinostat) Fotivda (tivozanib) None Gavreto (pralsetinib) None None Gilotrif (afatinib) Gleevec None (imatinib) Hycamtin Severe hypersensitivity to topotecan (topotecan) None Ibrance (palbociclib) KS_PS_SA_Oncology_PA_ProgSum_AR1020_r0821v2 Page 1 of 19 © Copyright Prime Therapeutics LLC. 08/2021 All Rights Reserved Effective: 10/01/2021 Agent(s) Contraindication(s) None Iclusig (ponatinib) Idhifa (enasidenib) None Imbruvica (ibrutinib)
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Abemaciclib (LY2835219)
    A Study of Abemaciclib (LY2835219) in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan and Abemaciclib in Combination With Temozolomide in Children and Young Adult Participants With Solid Tumors Status: Not yet recruiting Eligibility Criteria Sex: All Age: up to 18 Years old This study is NOT accepting healthy volunteers Inclusion Criteria: • Body weight ≥10 kilograms and body surface area (BSA) ≥0.5 meters squared. • Participants with any relapsed/refractory malignant solid tumor (excluding lymphoma), including central nervous system tumors, that have progressed on standard therapies and, in the judgment of the investigator, are appropriate candidates for the experimental therapy combination in the study part that is currently enrolling. • Participants must have at least one measurable (per Response Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST v1.1; [Eisenhauer et al. 2009] or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) for central nervous system (CNS) tumors [Wen et al. 2010]) or evaluable lesion. • Participants must have had histologic verification of malignancy at original diagnosis or relapse, except: • Participants with extra-cranial germ-cell tumors who have elevations of serum tumor markers including alpha-fetoprotein or beta- human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). • Participants with intrinsic brain stem tumors or participants with CNS-germ cell tumors and elevations of CSF or serum tumor markers including alpha-fetoprotein or beta-HCG. • A Lansky score ≥50 for participants ≤16 years of age or Karnofsky score ≥50 for participants >16 years of age. • Participants must have discontinued all previous treatments for cancer or investigational agents and must have recovered from the acute effects to Grade ≤1 at the time of enrollment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Drug Pharmacology Table
    CANCER DRUG PHARMACOLOGY TABLE Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Drugs are classified according to the BC Cancer Drug Manual Monographs, unless otherwise specified (see asterisks). Subclassifications are in brackets where applicable. Alkylating Agents have reactive groups (usually alkyl) that attach to Antimetabolites are structural analogues of naturally occurring molecules DNA or RNA, leading to interruption in synthesis of DNA, RNA, or required for DNA and RNA synthesis. When substituted for the natural body proteins. substances, they disrupt DNA and RNA synthesis. bendamustine (nitrogen mustard) azacitidine (pyrimidine analogue) busulfan (alkyl sulfonate) capecitabine (pyrimidine analogue) carboplatin (platinum) cladribine (adenosine analogue) carmustine (nitrosurea) cytarabine (pyrimidine analogue) chlorambucil (nitrogen mustard) fludarabine (purine analogue) cisplatin (platinum) fluorouracil (pyrimidine analogue) cyclophosphamide (nitrogen mustard) gemcitabine (pyrimidine analogue) dacarbazine (triazine) mercaptopurine (purine analogue) estramustine (nitrogen mustard with 17-beta-estradiol) methotrexate (folate analogue) hydroxyurea pralatrexate (folate analogue) ifosfamide (nitrogen mustard) pemetrexed (folate analogue) lomustine (nitrosurea) pentostatin (purine analogue) mechlorethamine (nitrogen mustard) raltitrexed (folate analogue) melphalan (nitrogen mustard) thioguanine (purine analogue) oxaliplatin (platinum) trifluridine-tipiracil (pyrimidine analogue/thymidine phosphorylase procarbazine (triazine) inhibitor)
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib, an Inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, for Patients with Breast Cancer, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Other Solid Tumors
    Published OnlineFirst May 23, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0095 RESEARCH ARTICLE Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib, an Inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, for Patients with Breast Cancer, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Other Solid Tumors Amita Patnaik1, Lee S. Rosen2, Sara M. Tolaney3, Anthony W. Tolcher1, Jonathan W. Goldman2, Leena Gandhi3, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos1, Muralidhar Beeram1, Drew W. Rasco1, John F. Hilton3, Aejaz Nasir4, Richard P. Beckmann4, Andrew E. Schade4, Angie D. Fulford4, Tuan S. Nguyen4, Ricardo Martinez4, Palaniappan Kulanthaivel4, Lily Q. Li4, Martin Frenzel4, Damien M. Cronier4, Edward M. Chan4, Keith T. Flaherty5, Patrick Y. Wen3, and Geoffrey I. Shapiro3 ABSTRACT We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamic effects, and antitumor activity of abemaciclib, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6, in a multicenter study including phase I dose escalation followed by tumor- specific cohorts for breast cancer, non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), glioblastoma, melanoma, and colorectal cancer. A total of 225 patients were enrolled: 33 in dose escalation and 192 in tumor-specific cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg every 12 hours. The most common possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events involved fatigue and the gastrointestinal, renal, or hematopoietic systems. Plasma concentrations increased with dose, and pharmacodynamic effects were observed in proliferating keratinocytes and tumors. Radiographic responses were achieved in previously treated patients with breast cancer, NSCLC, and melanoma. For hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, the overall response rate was 31%; moreover, 61% of patients achieved either response or stable disease lasting ≥6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021
    Page 1 of 65 BC Cancer Benefit Drug List September 2021 DEFINITIONS Class I Reimbursed for active cancer or approved treatment or approved indication only. Reimbursed for approved indications only. Completion of the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Application (formerly Undesignated Indication Form) is necessary to Restricted Funding (R) provide the appropriate clinical information for each patient. NOTES 1. BC Cancer will reimburse, to the Communities Oncology Network hospital pharmacy, the actual acquisition cost of a Benefit Drug, up to the maximum price as determined by BC Cancer, based on the current brand and contract price. Please contact the OSCAR Hotline at 1-888-355-0355 if more information is required. 2. Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) code only applicable to Class I drugs where indicated. 3. Intrahepatic use of chemotherapy drugs is not reimbursable unless specified. 4. For queries regarding other indications not specified, please contact the BC Cancer Compassionate Access Program Office at 604.877.6000 x 6277 or [email protected] DOSAGE TUMOUR PROTOCOL DRUG APPROVED INDICATIONS CLASS NOTES FORM SITE CODES Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer using abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUMCSPABI* R Abiraterone and Prednisone Palliative Therapy for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer abiraterone tablet Genitourinary UGUPABI R Using Abiraterone and prednisone acitretin capsule Lymphoma reversal of early dysplastic and neoplastic stem changes LYNOS I first-line treatment of epidermal
    [Show full text]
  • CNS Penetration of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib in Non-Tumor
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2019) 84:447–452 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03864-9 SHORT COMMUNICATION CNS penetration of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib in non‑tumor bearing mice and mice bearing pediatric brain tumors Yogesh T. Patel1,2 · Abigail Davis1 · Suzanne J. Baker3 · Olivia Campagne1 · Clinton F. Stewart1 Received: 22 January 2019 / Accepted: 3 May 2019 / Published online: 11 May 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose Ribociclib, an orally bioavailable small-molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor is currently undergoing evaluation to treat pedi- atric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, it is crucial that it penetrates the brain and tumor. Thus, the objectives of the present study were to derive a clinically relevant mouse dosage for cerebral microdialysis studies, and to characterize ribociclib CNS penetration in non-tumor bearing mice and in mice bearing DIPGx7 (glioma) cortical allograft tumors. Methods A plasma pharmacokinetic study of ribociclib (100 mg/kg, orally) was performed in CD1 nude mice bearing glioma cortical allografts to obtain initial plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and to derive D-optimal plasma sampling time-points for microdialysis studies. Using a cerebral microdialysis technique, the extracellular fuid (ECF) disposition of ribociclib was evaluated after a single oral ribociclib dose (100 mg/kg) in non-tumor bearing mice and in mice bearing glioma cortical allografts. A one-compartment plasma model with absorption and ECF compartments were ft to plasma and ECF concentration–time data using a nonlinear mixed efects modeling approach (NONMEM 7.2). Results The mean unbound ribociclib plasma exposure (6812 ng/ml*h) was similar to that observed clinically at recom- mended dosages in adults.
    [Show full text]
  • New Drug Update: the Next Step in Personalized Medicine
    New Drug Update: The Next Step in Personalized Medicine Jordan Hill, PharmD, BCOP Clinical Pharmacy Specialist WVU Medicine Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center Objectives • Review indications for new FDA approved anti- neoplastic medications in 2017 • Outline place in therapy of new medications • Become familiar with mechanisms of action of new medications • Describe adverse effects associated with new medications • Summarize dosing schemes and appropriate dose reductions for new medications First-in-Class Approvals • FLT3 inhibitor – midostaurin • IDH2 inhibitor – enasidenib • Anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate – inotuzumab ozogamicin • CAR T-cell therapy - tisagenlecleucel “Me-too” Approvals • CDK 4/6 inhibitor – ribociclib and abemaciclib • PD-L1 inhibitors • Avelumab • Durvalumab • PARP inhibitor – niraparib • ALK inhibitor – brigatinib • Pan-HER inhibitor – neratinib • Liposome-encapsulated combination of daunorubicin and cytarabine • PI3K inhibitor – copanlisib Drugs by Malignancy AML Breast Bladder ALL FL Lung Ovarian 0 1 2 3 Oral versus IV 46% 54% Oral IV FIRST-IN CLASS FLT3 Inhibitor - midostaurin Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2017;10:93 Midostaurin (Rydapt®) • 717 newly diagnosed FLT3+ AML Patients • Induction and consolidation chemotherapy and placebo maintenance versus chemotherapy + midostaurin and Treatment maintenance midostaurin • OS: 74.7 mo versus 25.6 mo (P=0.009) Efficacy • EFS: 8.2 mo versus 3.0 mo (P=0.002) • Higher grade > 3 anemia, rash, and nausea Safety N Engl J Med 2017;377:454-64 Midostaurin (Rydapt®) • Approved indications: FLT3+ AML, mast cell leukemia, systemic mastocytosis • AML dose: 50 mg twice daily with food on days 8-21 • Of each induction cycle (+ daunorubicin and cytarabine) • Of each consolidation cycle (+ high dose cytarabine) • ADEs: nausea, myelosuppression, mucositis, increases in LFTs, amylase/lipase, and electrolyte abnormalities • Pharmacokinetics: hepatic metabolism, substrate of CYP 3A4; < 5% excretion in urine RYDAPT (midostaurin) [package insert].
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Treatment for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Huateng Pharma https://en.huatengsci.com A Novel Treatment For Triple-negative Breast Cancer Triple-negative breast cancer is a cancer that tests negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and excess HER2 protein. These results mean the growth of the cancer is not fueled by the hormones estrogen and progesterone, or by the HER2 protein. So, triple-negative breast cancer does not respond to hormonal therapy medicines or medicines that target HER2 protein receptors. This type of breast cancer accounts for 10-20% of all types of breast cancer. It has special biological behavior and clinicopathological characteristics, and the prognosis is worse than other types. For doctors and researchers, there is intense interest in finding new medications that can treat this kind of breast cancer. Photodynamic therapy is a novel method for the treatment of breast cancer. By combining a photosensitizer with a corresponding light source, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated to selectively destroy the diseased tissues, so as to kill the cancer cells. But at the same time it will also lead to the formation of hypoxia in tumor tissues and reduce the therapeutic effect. Recently, the team of Professor Jin Hongjun from the Molecular Imaging Center of Sun Yat-sen University No.5 Hospital and the Tumor Center of Sun Yat-sen University No.5 Hospital explored a novel method to improve hypoxia in photodynamic therapy, and Huateng Pharma https://en.huatengsci.com preliminarily found that oxyphotodynamic therapy combined with metformin has the potential to treat triple-negative breast cancer. The research was published in the Annals of Translational Medicine (ATM,IF:3.297).
    [Show full text]
  • Ribociclib (LEE011)
    Clinical Development Ribociclib (LEE011) Oncology Clinical Protocol CLEE011G2301 (EarLEE-1) / NCT03078751 An open label, multi-center protocol for U.S. patients enrolled in a study of ribociclib with endocrine therapy as an adjuvant treatment in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2- negative, high risk early breast cancer Authors Document type Amended Protocol Version EUDRACT number 2014-001795-53 Version number 02 (Clean) Development phase II Document status Final Release date 17-Apr-2018 Property of Novartis Confidential May not be used, divulged, published or otherwise disclosed without the consent of Novartis Template version 22-Jul-2016 Novartis Confidential Page 2 Amended Protocol Version 02 (Clean) Protocol No. CLEE011G2301 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables ........................................................................................................................ 5 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 6 Glossary of terms ................................................................................................................. 9 Protocol summary .............................................................................................................. 10 Amendment 2 (17-Apr-2018) ............................................................................................ 14
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Binding Kinetics in Medicinal Chemistry: Facts Or Fantasy?
    Optimizing Binding Kinetics in Medicinal Chemistry: facts or fantasy? ‡ -Gon /RT kon e -G‡ /RT ‡ off ΔG on koff e -ΔGd/RT Kd e koff /kon P + L ‡ ΔG off ΔGd PL Gerhard Müller Ex-Head of Med Chem Mercachem, Nijmegen, NL Binding coordinate 11 The topic is hot, complex, and I am just an end-user & controversial “You can’t optimize koff, and you don’t need to optimize koff, you simply need to optimize Kd ! ” Head Med Chem, (top-5 Pharma), West Coast, US, Jan 2016 Optimizing Binding Kinetics in Medicinal Chemistry: facts or fantasy? ‡ -Gon /RT kon e -G‡ /RT ‡ off ΔG on koff e -ΔGd/RT Kd e koff /kon P + L ‡ ΔG off ΔGd PL Gerhard Müller Chief Scientific Officer Gotham Therapeutics, New YorkBinding coordinate 2 confidential Streetlight effect in medicinal chemistry Top-heavy distributions, rich-get-richer mechanisms 5% / 75% J. Med. Chem., 54 ,6405–6416 (2011) Vertex Pharmaceuticals, US J. Org. Chem. 73, 4443-4451 (2008) MW clogP shape clogP flatness Fsp3 flatland J. Med. Chem., 58, 2390−2405 (2015) para meta ortho J. Med. Chem., 59, 4443–4458 (2016) 3 Cheminformatics Analysis – Kinase Family Ligand and target promiscuity (ChEMBL21) Hu, Kunimoto, Bajorath Chemical Biology & Drug Design, 89, 834-845 (2017) quantitative kinome coverage 270 kinases with high-confidence data Top-10 kinases (45% of human kinome still unexplored) VEGFR2 TK 2239 erbB1 TK 1814 22.537 distinct IC50 values p38a CMGC 1509 9191 distinct scaffolds HGFR TK 1411 31.873 kinase-inhibitor combinations PI3a lipid 844 erbB-2 TK 768 GSK3b CMGC 743 SRC TK 709 Chk1 CAMK 693
    [Show full text]