Identification and Characterization of TALE Homeobox Genes in The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Taxonomic Revision of Hymenophyllaceae
BLUMEA 51: 221–280 Published on 27 July 2006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651906X622210 A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF HYMENOPHYLLACEAE ATSUSHI EBIHARA1, 2, JEAN-YVES DUBUISSON3, KUNIO IWATSUKI4, SABINE HENNEQUIN3 & MOTOMI ITO1 SUMMARY A new classification of Hymenophyllaceae, consisting of nine genera (Hymenophyllum, Didymoglos- sum, Crepidomanes, Polyphlebium, Vandenboschia, Abrodictyum, Trichomanes, Cephalomanes and Callistopteris) is proposed. Every genus, subgenus and section chiefly corresponds to the mono- phyletic group elucidated in molecular phylogenetic analyses based on chloroplast sequences. Brief descriptions and keys to the higher taxa are given, and their representative members are enumerated, including some new combinations. Key words: filmy ferns, Hymenophyllaceae, Hymenophyllum, Trichomanes. INTRODUCTION The Hymenophyllaceae, or ‘filmy ferns’, is the largest basal family of leptosporangiate ferns and comprises around 600 species (Iwatsuki, 1990). Members are easily distin- guished by their usually single-cell-thick laminae, and the monophyly of the family has not been questioned. The intrafamilial classification of the family, on the other hand, is highly controversial – several fundamentally different classifications are used by indi- vidual researchers and/or areas. Traditionally, only two genera – Hymenophyllum with bivalved involucres and Trichomanes with tubular involucres – have been recognized in this family. This scheme was expanded by Morton (1968) who hierarchically placed many subgenera, sections and subsections under -
The Glycosyltransferase Repertoire of the Spikemoss Selaginella Moellendorffiind a a Comparative Study of Its Cell Wall
Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Faculty Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Publications 5-2-2012 The Glycosyltransferase Repertoire of the Spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffiind a a Comparative Study of Its Cell Wall. Jesper Harholt Iben Sørensen Cornell University Jonatan Fangel Alison Roberts University of Rhode Island William G.T. Willats See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/btnypubs Recommended Citation Harholt, Jesper; Sørensen, Iben; Fangel, Jonatan; Roberts, Alison; Willats, William G.T.; Scheller, Henrik Vibe; Petersen, Bent Larsen; Banks, Jo Ann; and Ulvskov, Peter, "The Glycosyltransferase Repertoire of the Spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffii and a Comparative Study of Its Cell Wall." (2012). Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Faculty Publications. Paper 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035846 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Authors Jesper Harholt, Iben Sørensen, Jonatan Fangel, Alison Roberts, William G.T. Willats, Henrik Vibe Scheller, Bent Larsen Petersen, Jo Ann Banks, and Peter Ulvskov This article is available at Purdue e-Pubs: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/btnypubs/15 The Glycosyltransferase Repertoire of the Spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffii and a Comparative Study of Its Cell Wall Jesper Harholt1, Iben Sørensen1,2, Jonatan Fangel1, Alison Roberts3, William G. -
Vascular Plants
Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups Chapter 11 Vascular Plants Authors Ian Taylor, Simon J. Leach, John P. Martin, Robert A. Jones, Julian Woodman and Iain Macdonald To view other Part 2 chapters and Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines visit: https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/guidelines-for-selection-of-sssis/ Cite as: Taylor, I., Leach, S. J., Martin, J. P., Jones, R. A., Woodman, J. and Macdonald, I. 2021. Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups. Chapter 11 Vascular Plants. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. © Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2021 Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs – Part 2: Chapter 11 Vascular Plants (2021 revision v1.0) Cover note This chapter updates and replaces the previous Vascular Plant (VP) SSSI selection guidelines for vascular plants (JNCC 1989). It was drafted initially by Ian Taylor, Simon J. Leach and John P. Martin (NE) and Robert A. Jones (NRW), with the final draft in November 2020 produced by Ian Taylor (NE), Julian Woodman (NRW) and Iain Macdonald (NatureScot). It provides detailed guidance for selecting vascular plant sites throughout Great Britain to recommend for notification as SSSIs. It should be used in conjunction with Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines (Bainbridge et al. 2013), which details the overarching rationale, operational approach and criteria for the selection of SSSIs. The main changes from the previous vascular plant guidelines are: • a change of emphasis in favour of a species-by-species focus versus an in- combination (or assemblage) focus. -
Spermatophyte Flora of Liangzi Lake Wetland Nature Reserve
E3S Web of Conferences 143, 02040 (2 020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20 2014302040 ARFEE 2019 Spermatophyte Flora of Liangzi Lake Wetland Nature Reserve Xinyang Zhang, Shijing He*, Rong Tao, and Huan Dai Wuhan Institute of Design and Sciences, Wuhan 430205, China Abstract. Based on route and sample-plot survey, plant resources of Liangzi Lake Wetland Nature Reserve were investigated. The result showed that there were 503 species of spermatophyte belonging to 296 genera of 86 families. There were 5 species under national first and second level protection. The dominant families of spermatophyte contained 20 species and above. The dominant genera of spermatophyte contained 4 species and below. The 86 families of spermatophyte can be divided into 7 distribution types and 4 variants. Tropic distribution type was dominant, accounting for 70.83% in total (excluding cosmopolitans). The 296 genera of spermatophyte can be divided into 14 distribution types and 9 variants. Temperate elements were a little more than tropical elements, accounting for 50.84% and 49.16% in total (excluding cosmopolitans) respectively. Reserve had 3 Chinese endemic genera, reflecting certain ancient and relict. The purpose of the research is to provide background information and scientific basis for the protection, construction, management and rational utilization of plant resources in the reserve. 1 Preface temperature is 17℃, the annual average rainfall is 1663mm, the average sunshine hour is 2061 hours, and Flora refers to the sum of all plant species in a certain the frost free period is 270 days. The rain bearing area is region or country. It is the result of the development and 208500 hectares, and the annual average water level is evolution of the plant kingdom under certain natural and 17.81m. -
9:00 Am PLACE
CARTY S. CHANG INTERIM CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y. IGE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES GOVERNOR OF HAWAII COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT KEKOA KALUHIWA FIRST DEPUTY W. ROY HARDY ACTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR – WATER AQUATIC RESOURCES BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STATE OF HAWAII CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE HISTORIC PRESERVATION POST OFFICE BOX 621 KAHOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION LAND HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 STATE PARKS NATURAL AREA RESERVES SYSTEM COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 27, 2015 TIME: 9:00 a.m. PLACE: Department of Land and Natural Resources Boardroom, Kalanimoku Building, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 132, Honolulu. AGENDA ITEM 1. Call to order, introductions, move-ups. ITEM 2. Approval of the Minutes of the June 9, 2014 N atural Area Reserves System Commission Meeting. ITEM 3. Natural Area Partnership Program (NAPP). ITEM 3.a. Recommendation to the Board of Land and Natural Resources approval for authorization of funding for The Nature Conservancy of Hawaii for $663,600 during FY 16-21 for continued enrollment in the natural area partnership program and acceptance and approval of the Kapunakea Preserve Long Range Management Plan, TMK 4-4-7:01, 4-4-7:03, Lahaina, Maui. ITEM 3.b. Recommendation to the Board of Land and Natural Resources approval for authorization of funding for The Nature Conservancy of Hawaii for $470,802 during FY 16-21 for continued enrollment in the natural area partnership program and acceptance and approval of the Pelekunu Long Range Management Plan, TMK 5-4- 3:32, 5-9-6:11, Molokai. -
Curriculum Vitae
CURRICULUM VITAE ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0186-6546 Gar W. Rothwell Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor Emeritus Department of Environmental and Plant Biology Porter Hall 401E T: 740 593 1129 Ohio University F: 740 593 1130 Athens, OH 45701 E: [email protected] also Courtesy Professor Department of Botany and PlantPathology Oregon State University T: 541 737- 5252 Corvallis, OR 97331 E: [email protected] Education Ph.D.,1973 University of Alberta (Botany) M.S., 1969 University of Illinois, Chicago (Biology) B.A., 1966 Central Washington University (Biology) Academic Awards and Honors 2018 International Organisation of Palaeobotany lifetime Honorary Membership 2014 Fellow of the Paleontological Society 2009 Distinguished Fellow of the Botanical Society of America 2004 Ohio University Distinguished Professor 2002 Michael A. Cichan Award, Botanical Society of America 1999-2004 Ohio University Presidential Research Scholar in Biomedical and Life Sciences 1993 Edgar T. Wherry Award, Botanical Society of America 1991-1992 Outstanding Graduate Faculty Award, Ohio University 1982-1983 Chairman, Paleobotanical Section, Botanical Society of America 1972-1973 University of Alberta Dissertation Fellow 1971 Paleobotanical (Isabel Cookson) Award, Botanical Society of America Positions Held 2011-present Courtesy Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University 2008-2009 Visiting Senior Researcher, University of Alberta 2004-present Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio -
Fern Classification
16 Fern classification ALAN R. SMITH, KATHLEEN M. PRYER, ERIC SCHUETTPELZ, PETRA KORALL, HARALD SCHNEIDER, AND PAUL G. WOLF 16.1 Introduction and historical summary / Over the past 70 years, many fern classifications, nearly all based on morphology, most explicitly or implicitly phylogenetic, have been proposed. The most complete and commonly used classifications, some intended primar• ily as herbarium (filing) schemes, are summarized in Table 16.1, and include: Christensen (1938), Copeland (1947), Holttum (1947, 1949), Nayar (1970), Bierhorst (1971), Crabbe et al. (1975), Pichi Sermolli (1977), Ching (1978), Tryon and Tryon (1982), Kramer (in Kubitzki, 1990), Hennipman (1996), and Stevenson and Loconte (1996). Other classifications or trees implying relationships, some with a regional focus, include Bower (1926), Ching (1940), Dickason (1946), Wagner (1969), Tagawa and Iwatsuki (1972), Holttum (1973), and Mickel (1974). Tryon (1952) and Pichi Sermolli (1973) reviewed and reproduced many of these and still earlier classifica• tions, and Pichi Sermolli (1970, 1981, 1982, 1986) also summarized information on family names of ferns. Smith (1996) provided a summary and discussion of recent classifications. With the advent of cladistic methods and molecular sequencing techniques, there has been an increased interest in classifications reflecting evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies robustly support a basal dichotomy within vascular plants, separating the lycophytes (less than 1 % of extant vascular plants) from the euphyllophytes (Figure 16.l; Raubeson and Jansen, 1992, Kenrick and Crane, 1997; Pryer et al., 2001a, 2004a, 2004b; Qiu et al., 2006). Living euphyl• lophytes, in turn, comprise two major clades: spermatophytes (seed plants), which are in excess of 260 000 species (Thorne, 2002; Scotland and Wortley, Biology and Evolution of Ferns and Lycopliytes, ed. -
Diversity and Evolution of the Megaphyll in Euphyllophytes
G Model PALEVO-665; No. of Pages 16 ARTICLE IN PRESS C. R. Palevol xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Comptes Rendus Palevol w ww.sciencedirect.com General palaeontology, systematics and evolution (Palaeobotany) Diversity and evolution of the megaphyll in Euphyllophytes: Phylogenetic hypotheses and the problem of foliar organ definition Diversité et évolution de la mégaphylle chez les Euphyllophytes : hypothèses phylogénétiques et le problème de la définition de l’organe foliaire ∗ Adèle Corvez , Véronique Barriel , Jean-Yves Dubuisson UMR 7207 CNRS-MNHN-UPMC, centre de recherches en paléobiodiversité et paléoenvironnements, 57, rue Cuvier, CP 48, 75005 Paris, France a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Recent paleobotanical studies suggest that megaphylls evolved several times in land plant st Received 1 February 2012 evolution, implying that behind the single word “megaphyll” are hidden very differ- Accepted after revision 23 May 2012 ent notions and concepts. We therefore review current knowledge about diverse foliar Available online xxx organs and related characters observed in fossil and living plants, using one phylogenetic hypothesis to infer their origins and evolution. Four foliar organs and one lateral axis are Presented by Philippe Taquet described in detail and differ by the different combination of four main characters: lateral organ symmetry, abdaxity, planation and webbing. Phylogenetic analyses show that the Keywords: “true” megaphyll appeared at least twice in Euphyllophytes, and that the history of the Euphyllophytes Megaphyll four main characters is different in each case. The current definition of the megaphyll is questioned; we propose a clear and accurate terminology in order to remove ambiguities Bilateral symmetry Abdaxity of the current vocabulary. -
Late Devonian Spermatophyte Diversity and Paleoecology at Red Hill, North-Central Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Walter L
West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University Geology & Astronomy Faculty Publications Geology & Astronomy 2010 Late Devonian spermatophyte diversity and paleoecology at Red Hill, north-central Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Walter L. Cressler III West Chester University, [email protected] Cyrille Prestianni Ben A. LePage Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/geol_facpub Part of the Geology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Cressler III, W.L., Prestianni, C., and LePage, B.A. 2010. Late Devonian spermatophyte diversity and paleoecology at Red Hill, north- central Pennsylvania, U.S.A. International Journal of Coal Geology 83, 91-102. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology & Astronomy at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology & Astronomy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE IN PRESS COGEL-01655; No of Pages 12 International Journal of Coal Geology xxx (2009) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Coal Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcoalgeo Late Devonian spermatophyte diversity and paleoecology at Red Hill, north-central Pennsylvania, USA Walter L. Cressler III a,⁎, Cyrille Prestianni b, Ben A. LePage c a Francis Harvey Green Library, 29 West Rosedale Avenue, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, 19383, USA b Université de Liège, Boulevard du Rectorat B18, Liège 4000 Belgium c The Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA, 19103 and PECO Energy Company, 2301 Market Avenue, S9-1, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA article info abstract Article history: Early spermatophytes have been discovered at Red Hill, a Late Devonian (Famennian) fossil locality in north- Received 9 January 2009 central Pennsylvania, USA. -
Contribution to the Knowledge of the Pteridological Flora of El Hierro (Canary Islands)
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses Botanica Complutensis ISSN: 0214-4565 2001, 25, 289-297 Contribution to the knowledge of the Pteridological Flora of El Hierro (Canary Islands) Cleo BONALBERTI PERONI, Adalberto PERONI & Gabriele PERONI Museo Insubrico di Scienze Naturali, Piazza Giovanni XXIII 4, 21056 Indumo Olona (VA), Italy Abstract BONALBERTI PERONI, C., PERONI, A. & PERONI, G. 2001. Contribution to the knowledge of the Pteridoligical Flora of El Hierro (Canary Islands). Bot. Complutensis 25: 289-297. A study on the Pteridophyta of El Hierro, the western island of the Canary Archipelago, was realized. A census of 30 taxa subdivided in 12 families was made. Some notes have a greatest importance for the rareness of species or for ecological conditions where taxa ve- getate. Key words: Pteridophyta, distribution, Canary Islands, El Hierro. Resumen BONALBERTI PERONI, C., PERONI, A. & PERONI, G. 2001. Contribución al conocimiento de la flora pteridológica de El Hierro (Islas Canarias). Bot. Complutensis 25: 289-297. Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio de los pteridófitos de El Hierro, la más occidental de las islas del archipiélago canario. En total se han censado 30 táxones pertenecientes a 12 fami- lias. Las especies se acompañan de datos sobre su rareza y condiciones ecológicas en que se desarrollan. Palabras clave: Pteridophyta, distribución, Islas Canarias, El Hierro. INTRODUCTION The Canary Islands are located between 27°37′ (Punta de la Restinga, El Hie- rro) and 29°25′ (Punta de los Mosegos, Alegranza) of north latitude and between 13°20′ (Roque del Este) and 18°10′ (Punta de Orchilla, El Hierro) of west longitude in conformity with the Greenwich meridian. -
Hymenophyllaceae) and a New Combination in Trichomanes L
Muelleria 39: 75–78 Published online in advance of the print edition, 21 December 2020 Comparison of modern classifications for filmy ferns (Hymenophyllaceae) and a new combination in Trichomanes L. for the filmy fern Macroglena brassii Croxall, from Queensland, Australia Daniel J. Ohlsen Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Avenue, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; email: [email protected] Introduction Abstract Contemporary Hymenophyllaceae The filmy ferns (Hymenophyllaceae) are a distinctive group of treatments typically follow one of leptosporangiate ferns distinguished by a thin membranous lamina that two classifications that recognise is usually one cell thick (or occasionally up to four cells thick in some parts monophyletic genera. One comprises of the lamina) and marginal sori that are protected by an indusium in the nine genera, while the other recognises form of a cup-shaped or bilabiate involucre (Ebihara et al. 2007). Forty nine two genera, Hymenophyllum Sm. and Trichomanes L. Combinations exist for species of this family occur in Australia, of which 15 are probably endemic all Australian species that allow the (Green 1994; Bostock & Spokes 1998; Ebihara & Iwatsuki 2007). Two major former classification to be adopted lineages exist within the Hymenophyllaceae that largely correspond to the in Australia. However, genera of the two original genera recognised within the family: Hymenophyllum Sm. and former classification tend to be poorly Trichomanes L. (Pryer et al. 2001; Hennequin et al. 2003; Ebihara et al. 2004). defined morphologically compared to Numerous other classifications have been proposed that recognise several the latter classification. All Australian species have available combinations in additional genera (e.g. -
Xylem & Phloem Vascular Tissue
VASCULAR TISSUE P XYLEM & PHLOEM XYLEM ROOT C.S. VASCULAR TISSUE ^ M XYLEM & PHLOEM XYLEM PHLOEM ROOT C.S. MORPHOLOGY + MORPHIOLOGY STUDY PLANT EXTERNAL STRUCTURE MORPHOLOGY MORPHOLOGY STUDY EXTERNAL PLANT STRUCTURE ^ TERMINAL BUD P LATERAL BUD TERMINAL BUD SCALE SCAR ANGIOSPERM TWIG MORPHOLOGY TERMINAL BUD SCALE SCAR BUD SCAR TERMINAL BUD SCALE SCAR BUNDLE SCARS PHYLOGENY + PHYLOGENY STUDY PLANT EVOLUTION PHYLOGENY PHYLOGENY STUDY PLANT EVOLUTION PLANT PHYLOGENY ^ T TRACHEOPHYTES TAXONOMY + TAXONOMY STUDY PLANT CLASSIFICATION TAXONOMY TAXONOMY STUDY PLANT CLASSIFICATION PLANTAE ^ MAGNOLIOPHYTA MAGNOLIOPSIDA MAGNOLIALES MAGNOLIACEAE LIRIODENDRON TULIP POPLAR TAXONOMIC CLASSIFICATION TULIPIFERA > PLANT DEFINITION > PLANT DEFINTION NO COMMON DEFINITION AMONGST BOTANISTS ^ PLANT DEFINITION SUBJECTIVE P PLANT CLASS DEFINITION PLANT PLANT ORGANISM THAT POSSESSES PLASTIDS PLANT PLANT CELL P PLASTID C.S. PLASTID + PLASTID P PLANT ORGANELLE ASSOCIATED WITH: PLASTID PLASTID PLANT ORGANELLE ASSOCIATED WITH: PHOTOSYNTHESIS PLASTID PHOTOSYNTHESIS LEAF CELL C PLASTID C.S. PLANTLEAF CELL CELL P CHLOROPLAST C.S. PHOTOSYNTHESIS ^ WATER CO2 P LIGHT EGY PHOTO ATMOSPHERE E- PHOTOLYSIS LT RXT CHEMICAL DK RXT ENERGY THYLAKOID STROMA CHEM EGY SYNTHESIS INPUT CHLOROPLAST ATMOSPHERE OXYGEN GLUCOSE + PLASTID S PLANT ORGANELLE ASSOCIATED WITH: PLASTID P PLASTID PLANT ORGANELLE ASSOCIATED WITH: STARCH STORAGE PLASTID PHOTOSYNTHESIS S WATER CO2 LIGHT EGY PHOTO ATMOSPHERE E- PHOTOLYSIS LT RXT CHEMICAL DK RXT ENERGY THYLAKOID STROMA CHEM EGY SYNTHESIS INPUT CHLOROPLAST ATMOSPHERE OXYGEN GLUCOSE PHOTOSYNTHESIS WATER CO2 LIGHT EGY PHOTO ATMOSPHERE E- PHOTOLYSIS LT RXT CHEMICAL DK RXT ENERGY THYLAKOID STROMA CHEM EGY SYNTHESIS INPUT CHLOROPLAST ATMOSPHERE OXYGEN STARCH STARCH STORAGE P STARCH GRAINS ROOT C.S. STARCH STORAGE L PLASTIDS ROOT C.S. STARCH STORAGE ^ T LEUCOPLASTS ROOT C.S.