DOCSLIB.ORG

The Internationalization of Law and Legal Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Internationalization of Law and Legal Education December 18, 2008 Time: 07:25pm t1-v1.4 01 02 THE 03 04 INTERNATIONALIZATION 05 06 OF LAW AND LEGAL 07 08 09 EDUCATION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 07:25pm t1-v1.4 01 IUS GENTIUM 02 03 COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON LAW AND JUSTICE 04 05 06 VOLUME 2 07 08 09 10 11 Series Editor 12 13 Mortimer Sellers 14 (University of Baltimore) 15 16 17 Board of Editors 18 19 Myroslava Antonovych (Kyiv-Mohyla Academy) 20 Nadia de Araujo (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro) 21 Jasna Baksiˇ c-Mufti´ c´ (University of Sarajevo) 22 David L. Carey Miller (University of Aberdeen) 23 Loussia P. Musse Felix (University of Brasılia)´ 24 Emanuel Gross (University of Haifa) 25 James E. Hickey Jr. (Hofstra University) 26 Jan Klabbers (University of Helsinki) 27 Claudia Lima Marques (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul) 28 Eric Millard (Paris-Sud University) 29 Gabriel¨ Moens (Murdoch University, Australia) 30 Raul C. Pangalangan (The University of the Philippines) 31 Ricardo Leite Pinto (Lusıada´ University of Lisbon) 32 Mizanur Rahman (University of Dhaka) 33 Keita Sato (Chuo University) 34 Poonam Saxena (University of New Delhi) 35 Gerry Simpson (London School of Economics) 36 Eduard Somers (University of Ghent) 37 Xinqiang Sun (Shandong University) 38 Tadeusz Tomaszewski (University of Warsaw) 39 Jaap W. de Zwaan (Netherlands Inst. of Intrntl. Relations, Clingendael) 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 07:25pm t1-v1.4 01 02 THE 03 04 INTERNATIONALIZATION 05 06 OF LAW AND LEGAL 07 08 09 EDUCATION 10 11 12 13 14 15 Edited by 16 17 JAN KLABBERS 18 19 and 20 21 MORTIMER SELLERS 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 123 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 07:25pm t1-v1.4 01 Editors 02 Prof. Jan Klabbers Mortimer Sellers 03 University of Helsinki University of Baltimore Department of Public Law School of Law 04 Yliopistonkatu 3 Center for International & Comparative Law 05 FI-00014 Helsinki 1420 N. Charles St. 06 Finland Baltimore MD 21201-5779 07 jan.klabbers@helsinki.fi USA 08 [email protected] 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ISBN: 978-1-4020-9493-4 e-ISBN: 978-1-4020-9494-1 31 32 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9494-1 33 34 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008939497 35 36 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted 37 in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording 38 or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception 39 of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered 40 and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. 41 42 Printed on acid-free paper 43 987654321 44 45 springer.com December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 This book is dedicated to Johan Lauri Tuomola and 18 Cora Mary Stead Sellers. 19 multinational, multicultural, multitalented 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 Preface 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 The essays in this collection are based on papers originally presented at the 14 sixth meeting of the European-American Consortium for Legal Education, 15 held at the University of Helsinki, Finland in May, 2007. 16 EACLE is a transatlantic consortium of law faculties dedicated to coop- 17 eration and to the exchange of ideas between different legal systems and 18 cultures. Each year the EACLE colloquium considers a specific legal ques- 19 tion from a variety of national perspectives. The 2007 initiative on “The 20 Internationalization of Law and Legal Education” was coordinated by the 21 staff of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Law and the Academy of Fin- 22 land Centre of Excellence in Global Governance Research. We would like 23 to thank those who attended the 2007 meeting for their insightful remarks, 24 and for their inspiration, suggestions, and encouragement in making this 25 volume and the EACLE consortium so effective in fostering greater transat- 26 lantic cooperation on law and legal education. 27 Thanks are also due to the faculty, staff and students of the Center 28 for International and Comparative Law who prepared this volume for 29 publication, and particularly to Morad Eghbal, James Maxeiner, Kathryn 30 Spanogle, Jordan Kobb, Astarte Daley, Suzanne Conklin, P. Hong Le, Pra- 31 tima Lele, Nicholas McKinney, Shandon Phan, T.J. Sachse, Katherine Simp- 32 son, Toscha Stoner-Silbaugh, Bjorn¨ Thorstensen, Ryan Webster, and Cheri 33 Wendt-Taczak. 34 35 Helsinki, Finland Jan Klabbers 36 Baltimore, MD, USA Mortimer Sellers 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 vii December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 Contents 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 1 The Internationalization of Law and Legal Education .......... 1 14 Mortimer Sellers 15 16 2 Reflections on Globalization and University Life............... 7 17 Jan Klabbers 18 19 3 Building the World Community Through Legal Education ...... 21 20 Claudio Grossman 21 22 4 Integrating Practical Training and Professional 23 Legal Education ........................................... 37 24 James R. Maxeiner 25 26 5 Internationalizing the American Law School Curriculum 27 (in Light of the Carnegie Foundation’s Report) ................ 49 28 Larry Cata´ Backer 29 30 31 6 Resolving Multicultural Legal Cases: A Bottom Up Perspective 32 on the Internationalization of Law ...........................113 33 Wibo M. van Rossum 34 35 7 Maternity Leave Laws in the United States in the Light 36 of European Legislation ....................................129 37 Candace Saari Kovacic-Fleischer 38 39 8 Convergence and Mutual Recognition in European 40 Asylum Law ...............................................149 41 Ida Staffans 42 43 44 45 ix December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 x Contents 01 9 Copyright Protection for Works of Foreign Origin .............167 02 Tyler T. Ochoa 03 04 10 The Internationalization of Internet Law .....................191 05 Paul Przemysław Polanski´ 06 07 Index .........................................................211 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 Contributors 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Larry Cata´ Backer Penn State Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania 14 State University, Pennsylvania, USA 15 16 Claudio Grossman Dean, American University Washington College of Law, 17 Washington, DC, USA 18 19 Jan Klabbers International Organizations Law, University of Helsinki; 20 Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in Global Governance Research, 21 Helsinki, Finland 22 23 Candace Saari Kovacic-Fleischer American University, Washington College 24 of Law, Washington, DC, USA 25 26 James R. Maxeiner Center for International and Comparative Law, 27 University of Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore, MD, USA 28 29 TylerT.OchoaHigh Technology Law Institute, Santa Clara University 30 School of Law, Santa Clara, CA, USA 31 32 Paul Przemysław Polanski´ Department of European Law, Warsaw Univer- 33 sity Faculty of Law, Warsaw, Poland 34 35 Mortimer Sellers Regents Professor of the University System of Maryland; 36 University of Baltimore Center for International and Comparative Law, 37 Baltimore, MD, USA 38 39 Ida Staffans Institute for International Economic Law, University of 40 Helsinki; Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence in the Foundations of 41 European Law and Polity, Helsinki, Finland 42 43 Wibo M. van Rossum Department of Socio-legal Studies, Utrecht University 44 School of Law, Utrecht, The Netherlands 45 xi December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 December 18, 2008 Time: 09:10pm t1-v1.4 01 Chapter 1 02 03 The Internationalization of Law 04 and Legal Education 05 06 07 Mortimer Sellers 08 09 10 11 12 13 This volume is the product of international cooperation through the 14 European-American Consortium for Legal Education (EACLE) and as such 15 both a response to the internationalization of law and legal education and 16 an example of the changed circumstances that it describes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy
    Emory Law Journal Volume 65 Issue 6 The 2015 Pound Symposium — The "War" on the U.S. Civil Justice System (Co- Sponsored by the Pound Civil Justice Institute and Emory University School of Law) 2016 The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy Alexandra D. Lahav Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Alexandra D. Lahav, The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy, 65 Emory L. J. 1657 (2016). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol65/iss6/12 This Articles & Essays is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAHAV GALLEYSPROOFS2 6/13/2016 1:15 PM THE ROLES OF LITIGATION IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ∗ Alexandra D. Lahav ABSTRACT Adjudication is usually understood as having two functions: dispute resolution and law declaration. This Article presents the process of litigation as a third, equally important function and explains how in litigation, participants perform rule of law values. Performativity in litigation operates in five ways. First, litigation allows individuals, even the most downtrodden, to obtain recognition from a governmental officer (a judge) of their claims. Second, it promotes the production of reasoned arguments about legal questions and presentation of proofs in public, subject to cross-examination and debate. Third, it promotes transparency by forcing information required to present proofs and arguments to be revealed. Fourth, it aids in the enforcement of the law in two ways: by requiring wrongdoers to answer for their conduct to the tribunal and by revealing information that is used by other actors to enforce or change existing regulatory regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Magazine
    TRANSFORM EMPOWER ADVANCE EMPOWER AD VANCE TRANSFORM ADVANCEFALL EMPOWER TRANS 2015 VOL. UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW FORM EMPOWER 38 TRANSFORM ADVANCE OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS 405 HILGARD AVENUE BOX 951476 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1476 ADVANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER AD EM POWER ADVANCE | TRANSFORM MANCE A NEW LEADER EMERGES a new Dean Jennifer L. Mnookin Takes the Helm TRANSFORM EMPOWER leader A ADVANCE TR EMEM- POWER ADVANCE ANSFORM emerges EMPOWER ADVANCE ERwhat ADVANCE difference can you make in EMPOWERyour lifetime? EER TRANSFORM AD- VANCElaw.ucla.edu/centennialcampaign TRANSFORM EMPOWER ADVANCE TRANS FORM ADVANCE EMPOWER TRANSFORM EMPOW ER TRANSFORM ADVANCE EMPOWER ADVANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER TRANSFORM EMPOWER EMPOWER TRANSFORM ADVANCE TRANSFORM EMPOWER ADVANCE TRANSFORM ADVANCE EM POWER TRANSFORM EMPOWERMOMENTUM TRANSFORMthe UCLA CENTENNIAL CAMPAIGN AD 223601_Cover_r2.indd 1 9/8/15 3:28 PM contents Stay Connected with ! 16 63 67 VISIT US: Friends of the Court Kenneth Ziffren UCLA Law Hosts K law.ucla.edu Scholarship Established Senator Kirsten From amicus briefs to appellate Gillibrand ’91 litigation, the UCLA Law faculty Leadership gift supports LIKE US: is making an impact students pursuing Visit marks the launch of K facebook.com/UCLA-School-of-Law-Official entertainment, media or UCLA Law Women LEAD intellectual property careers FOLLOW US: K twitter.com/ucla_law WATCH US: K youtube.com/uclaschooloflaw CONNECT WITH ALUMNI: K uclalawconnect.com a new leader emerges NETWORK: FALL 2015 VOL. 38 K linkedin.com/groups/UCLA-Law-Alumni © 2015 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Dean Jennifer L. Mnookin Takes the Helm JOIN OUR ALUMNAE NETWORK: UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS BOX 951476 | LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1476 UCLA School of Law welcomes Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Professional Landscape of Large Law Firms
    Fordham Law Review Volume 78 Issue 5 Article 5 2010 The Changing Professional Landscape of Large Law Firms, Glass Ceilings and Dead Ends: Professional Ideologies, Gender Stereotypes, and the Future of Women Lawyers at Large Law Firms Eli Wald Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eli Wald, The Changing Professional Landscape of Large Law Firms, Glass Ceilings and Dead Ends: Professional Ideologies, Gender Stereotypes, and the Future of Women Lawyers at Large Law Firms, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 2245 (2010). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol78/iss5/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Changing Professional Landscape of Large Law Firms, Glass Ceilings and Dead Ends: Professional Ideologies, Gender Stereotypes, and the Future of Women Lawyers at Large Law Firms Cover Page Footnote Charles W. Delaney Jr. Associate Professor of Law and Hughes-Ruud Research Professor, University of Denver Sturm College of Law. I thank Richard Abel, Anthony Alfieri, Arthur Best, Elizabeth Chambliss, Marc Galanter, Bruce Green, Steve Landsman, Carol Needham, Paul Paton, Milton Regan, Nancy Reichman, Tanina Rostain, Carole Silver, Ashley Wald, and David Wilkins for their helpful comments. A special thank you to Cynthia Fuchs Epstein, Deborah Rhode, and Joyce Sterling for their advice and insights, and to Diane Burkhardt, Faculty Services Liaison at the Westminster Law Library at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, for her outstanding research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Divided We Litigate: Addressing Disputes Among Group Members and Lawyers in Civil Rights Campaigns
    Articles Divided We Litigate: Addressing Disputes Among Group Members and Lawyers in Civil Rights Campaigns William B. Rubenstein' Should political processes control the kinds of litigation a private attorney general can institute?' Groups are messy. They are, by definition, comprised of many individuals and thus encompass a range of desires and agendas. Any group must generate ways to reach decisions among these competing possibilities. Typically, groups develop formal and informal mechanisms to define their goals and strategies. Consider a law school faculty. The faculty is an identifiable group of individuals that has a set of formal decisionmaking processes for the various types of choices it must make. A faculty votes on whom to admit to the school, what courses will be offered, who will teach these courses, and upon whom degrees will be conferred. Most faculties accomplish these decisions by some form of democratic process (majority or supermajority votes following participatory, dialogic meetings) or by some form of expertise (delegation to committees that study issues in depth and provide recommendations to, or simply make decisions for, the group). It would be rare to find a faculty Acting Associate Professor of Law, Stanford Law School. An initial version of this Article was presented as a work in progress to the faculty at George Washington Univcrsity's National Law Center. I thank Paul Butler for initiating that invitation and the faculty for their constructive comments. I am grateful for the helpful suggestions that I received on earlier versions of this Article from Janet Cooper Alexander, Barbara Babcock, David Chambers, Man Coles. Peter Eliasberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalizing Rights in the National Security Executive
    Institutionalizing Rights in the National Security Executive Shirin Sinnar* The national security executive has grown explosively in size and power since September 11, 2001. This Article highlights a parallel development that has largely escaped notice: the rise in institutions within the executive branch chargedwith monitoring and protecting individual rights and liberties. Emerg- ing out of dual political impulses to expand executive power and protect rights, these institutions have proliferated,and theirpaths have diverged. A civil rights office struggled for influence across multiple political administrations;an In- spector General exposed rights violations and triggered reform; a civil liberties board capitalized on the Snowden controversy to surmount presidential neglect but not partisan division. Together, these case studies suggest that internal rights oversight is constantly challenged; only with a rare confluence of leader- ship, design, and external political circumstances can these institutions succeed. From these accounts, the Article makes three claims on the challenges and con- straintsfacing these institutions. First, rights-oversight institutions designed as "external reviewers," rather than as "internaladvisors, "may be betterpoised to reform policy. Second, both kinds of institutions face serious limitations in shaping executive legal interpretation on national security authority or the scope of legal rights. Third, these institutions are at perennial risk of mission drift - of shifting their attention from promoting rights to protecting national security. Ultimately, internal rights oversight plays a necessary but limited role in protecting rights at risk from the national security state. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................... 290 I. THE RISE OF INTERNAL RIGHTS OVERSIGHT ................ 294 A. New Institutions, New Mandates ...................... 294 B. Dual PoliticalImpulses .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyerord SPRING 2004
    stanfLawyerord SPRING 2004 Anthony Romero ’90 has persuaded thousands of people that it’s patriotic to join the ACLU. Who’s Un-American? stanfLawyerord Issue 68 / Vol. 38 / No. 2 Editor JONATHAN RABINOVITZ Communications Director ANN DETHLEFSEN (BA ’81, MA ’83) [email protected] Art Director ROBIN WEISS [email protected] Production Coordinator LINDA WILSON [email protected] Copy Editor DEBORAH FIFE Contributing Editors MANDY ERICKSON JUDITH ROMERO [email protected] Class Correspondents 61 RESOURCEFUL ALUMNI Editorial Interns LIEF N. HANIFORD (BA ’03, MA ’04) JOSEPHINE LAU (BA ’03, MA ’04) CHRISTINE LIYANTO (BA ’05) Production Associates JOANNA MCCLEAN ON THE DOCKET MARCH ROBERT MARY ANN RUNDELL Stanford Lawyer Upcoming Law School events* (ISSN 0585-0576) is published for alumni and friends of Stanford Law School. Battle of the Brains: Mar. 12 Fiduciary College: May 20–21 Correspondence and A Jeopardy-like contest among http://www.fiduciarycollege.com information should be sent to faculty and students sponsored Editor, Stanford Lawyer Stanford Law School annually by the Stanford Law Directors’ College: June 20–22 Crown Quadrangle Students Association. This year’s http://www.directorscollege.com 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 master of ceremonies: Ben Stein. or to: Best Practices in Marketing Software [email protected] Bringing Africa to the Forefront: and Other Content to the World over Changes of address should be sent to: Contemporary and International the Internet: June 25 [email protected] Law and Development in “Africa’s http://www.law.stanford.edu/ Copyright 2004 by the Board of Trustees Century”: Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • 153 How to Build a Public Interest
    HOW TO BUILD A PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYER (AND HELP ALL LAW STUDENTS ALONG THE WAY) By Aliza B. Kaplanx I. Introduction We hear a great deal about the ineffectiveness of law school education and the lack of preparation for practice provided to law school students.1 But this is nothing new to public interest lawyers. In fact, students entering law school with plans for careers in public interest law regularly express dissatisfaction with their law school experience.2 The “signature pedagogy” of x Associate Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School. JD Northeastern University School of Law, BA The George Washington University. I would like to thank Professor Cynthia Godsoe of Brooklyn Law School, Lewis & Clark Law School students Rachael Federico (13) and Diana Winther (14), and all the students from my Public Interest Lawyering classes for their help with and motivation for this article. Finally, thank you G for your light, my parents for your encouragement, and S, E, and M for your love. 1. Neil J. Dilloff, The Changing Cultures and Economics of Large Law Firm Practice and Their Impact on Legal Education, 70 MD. L. REV. 341, 359 (2011) (“No longer is it sufficient for law schools to impart basic substantive law, train students to think like lawyers, and prepare them to pass the bar examination. More intensive real world experience is essential and may include apprenticeships with practicing lawyers, clinical experiences with actual clients, and more crossdisciplinary and multidisciplinary courses.”); Bryan A. Garner, Three Years, Better Spent, N.Y. TIMES (July 25, 2011, 11:42 AM), http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/07/21/the- case-against-law-school/three-years-in-law-school-spent-better; Deborah L.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio; John Lancione, Fairview Park, Ohio; Columbus, OH 43210-1391 and Albert and Jean Bell, Westerville, Ohio
    College of Law Alumni A ssociation • Fall/W inter 1999 jurist, statesman, public servant are award recipients Trading a high-pow ered career for a com puter and a cause U ntangling a legal tw ist R eunion Photos H onor R oll of D onors C O N T E N T S College of Law Administration 1 3 Gregory H. Williams Dean Honor Roll College of Law Alumni of Donors Society Officers Elizabeth J. Watters '90 Friends and alumni President gave more than Jeffrey S. Sutton '90 $1 million last year. President-Elect National Council Officers David A. Ward '58 Chair 2 3 Carla D. Moore '77 Alumni News Vic&Chair Learn what’s new Pamela H. Lombardi Secretary with your classmates. Send address changes and alumni news to: The Law Record OSU College of Law Members of the class of1959 and their spouses get reacquainted during the Deans reception on 3 ° John Deaver Drinko Hall September 17. Pictured left to right are Stuart Summit, New York, N. Y; Doreen and Peter A Jurist, 55 West 12th Avenue Rosato, Yonkers, N. Y; Alan Berman, Cleveland, Ohio; John Lancione, Fairview Park, Ohio; Columbus, OH 43210-1391 and Albert and Jean Bell, Westerville, Ohio. a Statesman, Phone: (614) 292-2631 FAX: (614) 292-1492 a Public Servant [email protected] and a Professor The Law Record is published From the Dean Law Grad Earns Legal Twist Honored for the alumni and friends of The Ohio State University $64,000 in the Ken Robinson ’98 Alumni Awards College of Law “Big Chair” untangles snarl o f recognize the cream Liz Cutler Gates JeffSiehl ’98 has his broken requirements o f the crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword Articles Tributes
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword A Man for All Seasons: A Remembrance of Geoffrey C. Hazard David L. Faigman ................................................................................... 949 Articles Access to Justice and Routine Legal Services: New Technologies Meet Bar Regulators Benjamin H. Barton & Deborah L. Rhode ............................................. 955 Incorporation by Reference: Requiem for a Useless Tradition Antonio Gidi ........................................................................................... 989 Tributes Cornerstones of Civil Justice Neil Andrews......................................................................................... 1045 Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr.: An American in Paris Loïc Cadiet ........................................................................................... 1057 Learning from Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., by Example and Precept Edward H. Cooper ................................................................................ 1063 Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., and the Comparison Angelo Dondi ........................................................................................ 1067 Professor Geoff Hazard The Honorable William A. Fletcher ..................................................... 1071 Reflections on a Thirty-Five Year Collaboration W. William Hodes ................................................................................. 1073 Geoff Hazard: My Views as a Law Student, Mentee and Coauthor Peter R. Jarvis .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Law School Campaign Donor Recognition Gallery
    STANFORD LAW SCHOOL CAMPAIGN DONOR RECOGNITION GALLERY [ r tanford Law School is pleased to announce the creation of a unique recognition piece S in honor of the many contributors to the Campaign for Stanford Law School, which raised over $115 million for the school. The Campaign Donor Recognition Gallery will acknowledge alumni and friends who made gifts between 1994 and 1999. It will be installed in the summer of 2000 and will be located in the James Irvine Gallery in the law school's Crown Quadrangle. Please visit the gallery during Alumni Weekend, October 19 to 22, 2000. SHAKING THE FOUNDATIONS Stanford Law School THE WEST COAST March 3 to 5, 2000 CONFERENCE ON Thank You to Our Generous PROGRESSIVE and Many Donors LAWYERING We Couldn't Have Done It Without You! COSPONSORS Environmental Law Society Earl & M. Rosalind Hoover Anonymous Jewish Law Students Association Kristina Kalka BarBri Latino Law Students Association Suzanne McKechnie Klahr Paul & Iris Brest Law Association Julie Lythcott-Haims Lieff, Cabraser. Heimann & Bernstein National Lawyers' Guild, Carole Wedel Sellars Office of the Dean, Stanford Law School Stanford Chapter Stanford Law School Special Fund Outlaw STANFORD LAW SCHOOL OFFICES Public Interest Law Students Association Office of Public Interest Programs LOCAL PUBLIC INTEREST Stanford Journal of Legal Studies Office of Public Policy & Externships LAW FIRMS & Office of Student Affairs COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS STANFORD UNIVERSITY DONORS Brancart & Brancart American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native STANFORD LAW SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Deborah L. Rhode's Access to Justice: Foreword
    Fordham Law Review Volume 73 Issue 3 Article 1 2004 Deborah L. Rhode's Access to Justice: Foreword Bruce A. Green Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Bruce A. Green, Deborah L. Rhode's Access to Justice: Foreword, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 841 (2004). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol73/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deborah L. Rhode's Access to Justice: Foreword Cover Page Footnote Louis Stein Professor of Law, Fordham University School of Law; Director, Louis Stein Center for Law and Ethics. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol73/iss3/1 COLLOQUIUM DEBORAH L. RHODE'S ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOREWORD Bruce A. Green* The photograph of Thurgood Marshall on the wall over my desk is not one of the well-known ones taken circa Brown v. Board of Education,' when he was a civil rights leader and courtroom lawyer striving heroically to realize the promise of "equal justice under law." 2 It was taken by Deborah Rhode years later when Marshall was serving as a Justice of the Supreme Court. Like Rhode's writings, her photograph is artfully composed and captures the essence of its subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg
    HONORABLE DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG Oral History Project The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit Oral History Project United States Courts The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit District of Columbia Circuit HONORABLE DOUGLAS H. GINSBURG Interviews conducted by Daniel Marcus, Esquire June 18 and September 6, 2012 June 18, July 3, September 4, December 5 and December 19, 2013 January 14, March 21 and September 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface. ................................................................................................................................ i Oral History Agreements Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg............................................................................... iii Daniel Marcus, Esquire ...............................................................................................v Oral History Transcripts of Interviews Note: The transcripts do not include the interview of November 26, 2013, concerning Judge Ginsburg’s possible nomination to the Supreme Court in 1987. That interview is sealed until 2040. June 18, 2012 ..............................................................................................................1 September 6, 2012 ....................................................................................................32 June 18, 2013 ............................................................................................................56 July 3, 2013 .............................................................................................................100
    [Show full text]