DOCSLIB.ORG

Here to Make Sure That It Isn't

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

---------- ~LL POLITICIANS, SENATOR STANFORD OFTEN TOOK A BEATING IN THE PRESS. BUT WHEN HE SAID HE WOULD BEOUEATH $20 MILLION TO FOUND A UNIVERSITY IN LOVING MEMORY OF HIS SON, THINGS GOT REALLY NASTY. I·A~·~"rc~:nts~a:;;~~~·~~t ~niy And the reporter wasn't ;ealth oan be used to erect an empty ehell aiid to com­ finished. ({ ... we hope that t memorato a 'rich man'. Collv_ - . _. ·,t VI'''' exoect r..,. i Senator Stanford will burn the The New York Commercial Advertiser, will....To create a great university Aladdin- on Senator Stanford'sfoundinggiji of$20 million. like out of money is as useless as support the school you love can sometimes would be the building of an seem like a daunting process. institution for the relief of We're here to make sure that it isn't. destitute ship-captains in The Office of Planned Giving can help the mountains of Switzerland." you with everything from simple bequests to Of course, history has proven the writer charitable remainder trusts. dreadfully wrong. The university flourished, Our staff of attorneys can in large part because of bequests and other prepare draft language for 77Je Office ofPlanned Giving planned gifts from thousands who followed a will or trust, analyze tax can help guideyou and ellSure your 'luis/us are honored. Jane and Leland Stanford's example. implications of various gift options, and answer But still, the reaction to Senator Stanford's any questions you or your advisors might have. original bequest raises a point. That, no matter Call us at (800) 227-8977 ext. 54358, or write us how noble the intention, giving money to at 301 Encina Hall, Stanford, CA 94305. STA:-":FOHI> ()FFI(;E ()F PL;'.:'lNEI> (; I v IN (; The name's the same-Stanford Lawyef-and so are the ever-popular class notes. What's new is the reader-friendly format and focus. 6,Nf()IID LAWYER Let us know what you think. otice anything new? We hope so. Stanford Lawyer, now 30 years and 50 197 0 issues old, has been renovated from the ground up, with the needs and wants of today's alumni firmly in mind. Recognizing that you're a busy person, we are focusing on news that you can use and are unlikely to get elsewhere. And we've put the news up front where you can readily find it. To save you time, we've also shortened and condensed our articles. Those who want to delve more deeply will find telephone, Internet, and other "links" flagged by CD (for infor- mation). Think-resource guide. Our recent alumni survey confirmed the conventional wisdom: Class notes are by far the most popular feature. You'll be glad to know that we continue to publish the most 1 9 8 1 comprehensive alumni notes in the law school world. Survey respondents also said they would like to receive the magazine more often. We hereby pledge to pick up the pace, with a goal of three (rather than two) issues a year. Finally, recognizing that the magazine had begun to look a bit stale, we have freshened our design and layout. We welcome your reactions and comments. Please address them to editor Constance Hellyer: e-mail [email protected]; telephone 650/723-3019; fax 650/725-0253; or write the Communications Office, Crown Quadrangle, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA 1 9 9 6 94305-8610. ~ STANFORD lAWYlR 0 #51 (Vol. 32, No.1) Fall 1997 Stanford Law School Law and Technology Policy Center Generallnfonnation (650) 725-7788 DEAN (650) 723-2465 [email protected] Paul Brest Law. [email protected] Richard E. Lang Professor of Law Law Fund and Dean Administration (650) 725-8115 ASSOCIATE DEAN (650) 723-2742 Law. [email protected] EXTERNAL RELATIONS Law.Administration@forsythe. Susan S. Bell stanford. edu Robert Crown Law Library (650) 723-2477 COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR Admissions [email protected] Ann Dethl fsen (650) 723-4985 [email protected] Natural and Environmental Resources EDITOR Constance Hellyer Law Program Alumni Publications (650) 723-4057 ART DIRECTOR (650) 723-9301 megC©leland.stanford.edu Andrew Danish Law. Alum. [email protected] John M. Olin Program CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Alumni Relations in Law and Economics Deborah Fife, John Boykin (650) 723-2730 (650) 723-2575 EDITORIAL INTERNS Law. Alumni. Relations@forsythe. [email protected] Jamal Morris (JD '98) stanford.edu Michael Finney (AB '00) Public Interest Law Programs Career Services (650) 725-4192 PRODUCTION ARTISTS (650) 723-3924 [email protected] Dianna Henderson, Joanna McClean Law. Career. Services@forsythe. stanford.edu Registrar STANFORD LAWYER (I SN 0585-0576) (650) 723-3430 is published for alumni and friends of Continuing Legal Education Law. Registrar@forsythe .stanford. edu Stanford Law School. Correspondence and (650) 723-5905 information should be sent to: Law [email protected] Room scheduling Editor, Stanford Lawyer, tanford Law (650) 723-2692 School, Stanford, A 94305-8610. Dean's Office [email protected] E-mail: Law.Alum.Pllbs@forsythe. (650) 723-4455 sranford.edu Law. [email protected] Stanford Center on Conflict and Copyright 1997 by the Board ofTrustees Negotiation of Leland Stanford Junior University. Development (650) 723-9480 Reproduction in whole or in part, (650) 723-9504 [email protected] without permi sion of the publisher, Law. [email protected] is prohibited. Stanford Program in International STANFORD LAWYER is listed in: Faculty Affairs Legal Studies Dialog's Legal Resource Index; (650) 723-3960 (650) 723-2978 and Current Law Index and LegalTrac Law. Faculty [email protected] Kate. [email protected] (1980-94). Issues of the magazine since 1966 are available on microfiche through Family Advocacy and Support Program Student Affairs William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main treet, (650) 725-9418 (650) 723-4522 Buffalo, NY 14209-1987. [email protected] Law. Student.Affairs@forsythe. Printed by Alonzo Printing in Hayward, stanford.edu California. Alonzo Printing is a Ilnion shop that Financial Aid pnnts exclusively on recycled and tree- free papers (650) 723-9247 Law School Web Site using soy-based inks. Law. [email protected] http://www-leland.stanford.edu/ group/law/ Law and Business Program (650) 725-0802 [email protected] 8 FAI L 1997 ISS UE 5 I, F ALL I 9 9 7 14 Tax Reform Five sensible ways to lighten the taxpayer's burden. You mighr never have to file again. by Professor Joseph L. Bankman 18 Professors in Print Some excerpts and a comprehensive bibliography. Compiled by Erika Wayne _____ILLP ART ~,-,-T~S",-----__ 5 __C 0 V -.E _"- _ News Briefs Professor Joseph Bankman Introducing your quickest source on securities fraud ponders our imposing tax system and litigation. This and other news of the School, and how you can suggests some reforms. enjoy its resources and activities. Phowgraph by Richard Morgenstein 23 Classmates & Sidebars Fifty-plus class columns, with sidebars on: a travel maven ... 31 big-city police commissioner 33 stereotype-defying Republican 39 defender of privacy 47 storefront educator 51 twenty-something dean 53 59 In Memoriam 60 Law Gatherings 64 Coming Events "My personal and professional world was broadened more j.Mul"~ by this fellowship year than by any "What I learned about other educational . government as a White ~- ,~ expenenceln •I House Fellow was the key ~.. h my life." to the opportunities that TOM JOHNSON, came my way. " President, CNN White House Fellow 1965-66 GEN. COLIN POWELL, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff White House Fellow 1972-73 Become a White House Fellow Since 1965, the White House Fellowships have offered a select group of outstanding men and women a year-long opportunity to participate in government at the highest levels. Between 11 to 19 Fellows are chosen each year to serve as full-time, paid assistants to Cabinet secretaries, executive branch agency heads and senior White House staff. The nearly 500 alumni of the program have gone on to become leaders in all fields of endeavor, fulfilling the fellowship's mission to encourage active citizen hip and service to the nation. SELECTION CRITERIA "The opportunity to • Applicants must be U.S. citizens. • Employees of the federal government are not eligible unless they are learn about varying career military personnel. leadership styles as well • Applicants should be out of school and working in their chosen professions. as understand how our • Applicants are expected to have a record of remarkable achievement government and our early in their careers; the skills required to serve at the highest levels of government; the potential to be leaders in their professions; and a proven military function has commitment to public service. greatly enhanced my • Fellowships are awarded on a strict non-partisan basis. capability to be a FOR MORE INFORMATION corporate leader." Contact the President's Commission on White House Fellowships: 712Jackson Place, NW, PAULA H. CHOLMONDELEY, Washington, DC 20503. Vice President, General Manager, Telephone: (202) 395-4522 Division of Owens·Coming Facsimile: (202) 395-6179 White House Fellow 1982-83 Web: http://www.whitehouse.gov/wh_fellows FA ULTV Professors in the news &on the air denying Ala ka the ley ofColumbia and known for h r lucid lagoon off the Wild­ politi al scientist commentary on Night­ life Refuge. Nelson W. Potsby of line and the NewsHour CD See Report ofthe UC-Berkeley. These with Jim Lehrer. At Special Master. U.s. v. modern essay , like Stanford, she is the Alaska, U.S. Supreme the originals, explore inaugural Stanley Court. October Term, the underlying princi­ Morrison Profe sor 1995.
Recommended publications
  • The Mont Pelerin Society

    The Mont Pelerin Society

    A SPECIAL MEETING THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY JANUARY 15–17, 2020 FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE: IDEAS AND ACTIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY CHAPTER THIRTY-FOUR MAKING THE CASE FOR LIBERTY RUSSELL ROBERTS HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 1 1 MAKING THE CASE FOR LIBERTY Prepared for the January 2020 Mont Pelerin Society Meeting Hoover Institution, Stanford University Russ Roberts John and Jean De Nault Research Fellow Hoover Institution Stanford University [email protected] 1 2 According to many economists and pundits, we are living under the dominion of Milton Friedman’s free market, neoliberal worldview. Such is the claim of the recent book, The Economists’ Hour by Binyamin Applebaum. He blames the policy prescriptions of free- market economists for slower growth, inequality, and declining life expectancy. The most important figure in this seemingly disastrous intellectual revolution? “Milton Friedman, an elfin libertarian…Friedman offered an appealingly simple answer for the nation’s problems: Government should get out of the way.” A similar judgment is delivered in a recent article in the Boston Review by Suresh Naidu, Dani Rodrik, and Gabriel Zucman: Leading economists such as Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman were among the founders of the Mont Pelerin Society, the influential group of intellectuals whose advocacy of markets and hostility to government intervention proved highly effective in reshaping the policy landscape after 1980. Deregulation, financialization, dismantling of the welfare state, deinstitutionalization of labor markets, reduction in corporate and progressive taxation, and the pursuit of hyper-globalization—the culprits behind rising inequalities—all seem to be rooted in conventional economic doctrines.
  • Detailed 2018-2019 University Committee List

    Detailed 2018-2019 University Committee List

    Detailed 2018-2019 University Committee List - Apply Here: https://goo.gl/forms/jz9X66df2BLSpbaC2 ​ Note : All Committees reserve the right to re-appoint student nominees for additional terms. # Committee Committee Contact # Students & Time Commitment Student Needs & Notes Name Information Details 1 Academic Paul Murray 3 (Combination of Meets approximately twice a quarter, for a Council: Research Computing Undergrads and total of 6 meetings a year. Meeting have Committee on Strategist Grads; if more than traditionally been late in the day, ~4ish for Academic 650-723-4328 one Grad student is 1.5hr. Snacks and drinks provided! Computing and [email protected] selected, they Information should be from Systems different schools) 2 Academic Laura Remillard, 4 (Graduate The Committee on Graduate Studies usually 2014-15: need representation from H&S, Council: Academic Committee students; they meets on Wednesdays 12-1:30pm, every Earth Sciences, SoM, GSB and Law. Committee on Coordinator, (650) should be from two weeks. Meets approximately five times Graduate 475-6075, different schools). a quarter. The committee has academic policy Studies [email protected] Preference should responsibilities for the substance and be given to Students who are interested in C-GS should presentation of graduate education (e.g. returning members be aware of this kind of commitment, as graduate admissions, minimum standards for due to the ongoing our students have been very active graduate work, graduate financial aid, discussions from members over the last few years. minority recruitment/retention, initiation and year to year. renewal of graduate degree programs, etc.). 3 Academic Mimi Calter, Deputy Students Needed: 3 Meets approximately twice a quarter.
  • Beth Van Schaack Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law � 500 El Camino Real � Santa Clara, CA 95053

    Beth Van Schaack Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

    Beth Van Schaack Professor of Law Santa Clara University School of Law 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053 EDUCATION YALE LAW SCHOOL, J.D. (1997) • Student Director, Schell Center for International Human Rights & Lowenstein Human Rights Clinic • Editor, YALE LAW JOURNAL STANFORD UNIVERSITY, B.A., Human Biology with a concentration in Feminism & Public Policy, (1991); Phi Beta Kappa EXPERIENCE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, STANFORD UNIVERSITY (2014-15) Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights. Teaching, blogging, and writing in the areas of human rights, national security, international criminal law, the law of armed conflict; developed new international criminal law intensive course with site visits to The Hague; developed new Policy Lab on Legal & Policy Tools to Prevent Atrocities; teaching International Justice with the International Policy Studies Program. FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY • Visiting Scholar, Center for International Security & Cooperation (2013-2014). Researching U.S. and global policy on atrocities prevention and response. • Visiting Scholar, Center on Democracy, Development & the Rule of Law (2009-10). Researched the uses and misuses of international humanitarian law in U.S. litigation and the responsiveness of the major international institutions (including United Nations bodies, human rights committees, and international criminal tribunals) to women’s human rights claims. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington D.C. • Deputy, Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, Office of Global Criminal Justice (2012- 2013). Helped advise the Secretary of State and the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights on issues related to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide; helped formulate U.S.
  • The Red Guide

    The Red Guide

    The Red Guide THE (UN)OFFICIAL GUIDE TO STANFORD LAW SCHOOL The First and Only Guide to SLS Created by and for SLS Students Brought to you by: Stanford Law Association (SLA) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 2 ACADEMIC TERMS & TIPS ............................................................................................................................ 4 IMPORTANT: How to Get a SLATA Outline ................................................................................................... 5 TIPS FOR PET OWNERS ................................................................................................................................. 7 TIPS FOR OUTDOOR LOVERS ........................................................................................................................ 7 FOOD AND COFFEE MAP .............................................................................................................................. 8 STUDY SPOT MAP ........................................................................................................................................ 9 MAP OF CAMPUS ....................................................................................................................................... 11 TIPS FOR STUDENT-PARENTS ..................................................................................................................... 12 TIPS FOR SIGNIFICANT OTHERS
  • Stanford University, Cantor Arts Center, Videorecordings

    Stanford University, Cantor Arts Center, Videorecordings

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt038nd9vz No online items Guide to the Stanford University, Cantor Arts Center, Videorecordings Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California November 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Stanford University, V0194 1 Cantor Arts Center, Videorecordings Overview Call Number: V0194 Creator: Iris & B. Gerald Cantor Center for Visual Arts at Stanford University Title: Stanford University, Cantor Arts Center, videorecordings Dates: 1999 Physical Description: 0.01 Linear feet 1 video disc Summary: Videorecording (and DVD copy) on the repair and renovation of the museum, with an emphasis on the final six months; persons interviewed are Richard M. Olcott, principal architect, Mindy Cameron, exhibition designer, Thomas K. Seligman, director, and Hilarie Faberman, curator. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Gift of Jack Hubbard, 1999. Information about Access This collection is open for research. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner.
  • Welcoming Dean Rachel F. Moran

    Welcoming Dean Rachel F. Moran

    PRESORTED FIRST CLASS MAIL NO. 1 NO. US POSTAGE PAID Box 951476 33 UCLA Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476 VOL. FALL 2010 FALL Welcoming Dean Rachel F. moRan Q & a With Ucla laW’s 8th Dean Williams institUte celebRates 10 Years of Groundbreaking Impact on Law and Public Policy 211791_Cover_FC_r4.indd 1 9/9/2010 1:17:01 PM contents FALL 2010 VOL. 33 NO. 1 © 2010 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS BOX 951476 | LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90095-1476 Stephen C. Yeazell uCLa Law bOaRD Of aDvISORS 38 Interim Dean and David G. Price and Dallas P. Price Kenneth Ziffren ’65, Chair Distinguished Professor of Law Nancy L. Abell ’79 Rachel F. Moran James D. C. Barrall ’75 Dean Designate Jonathan F. Chait ’75 Laura Lavado Parker Stephen E. Claman ’59 Associate Dean, External Affairs Melanie K. Cook ’78 Lauri L. Gavel David J. Epstein ’64 41 56 Director of Communications Edwin F. Feo ’77 David W. Fleming ’59 resnick gift cappello courtroom student trips EDITORS Arthur N. Greenberg ’52 Lauri L. Gavel Bernard A. Greenberg ’58 Director of Communications A gift from Stewart celebration Students travel the globe Antonia Hernández ’74 Sara Wolosky Margarita Paláu Hernández ’85 ’62 and Lynda Resnick UCLA Law inaugurates to further work of UCLA Communications Officer Joseph K. Kornwasser ’72 supports public the A. Barry Cappello Law programs. Stewart C. Kwoh ’74 DESIGN service work. Courtroom with a visit Victor B. MacFarlane ’78 Frank Lopez Michael T. Masin ’69 Manager of Publications by the Ninth Circuit.
  • The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy

    The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy

    Emory Law Journal Volume 65 Issue 6 The 2015 Pound Symposium — The "War" on the U.S. Civil Justice System (Co- Sponsored by the Pound Civil Justice Institute and Emory University School of Law) 2016 The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy Alexandra D. Lahav Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Alexandra D. Lahav, The Roles of Litigation in American Democracy, 65 Emory L. J. 1657 (2016). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol65/iss6/12 This Articles & Essays is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAHAV GALLEYSPROOFS2 6/13/2016 1:15 PM THE ROLES OF LITIGATION IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY ∗ Alexandra D. Lahav ABSTRACT Adjudication is usually understood as having two functions: dispute resolution and law declaration. This Article presents the process of litigation as a third, equally important function and explains how in litigation, participants perform rule of law values. Performativity in litigation operates in five ways. First, litigation allows individuals, even the most downtrodden, to obtain recognition from a governmental officer (a judge) of their claims. Second, it promotes the production of reasoned arguments about legal questions and presentation of proofs in public, subject to cross-examination and debate. Third, it promotes transparency by forcing information required to present proofs and arguments to be revealed. Fourth, it aids in the enforcement of the law in two ways: by requiring wrongdoers to answer for their conduct to the tribunal and by revealing information that is used by other actors to enforce or change existing regulatory regimes.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman

    Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman

    Hastings Law Journal Volume 45 | Issue 3 Article 7 1-1994 Codification and the California Mentality Lewis Grossman Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Lewis Grossman, Codification and the California Mentality, 45 Hastings L.J. 617 (1994). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol45/iss3/7 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Essay Codification and the California Mentality by LEwIS GROSSMAN* Introduction: The Pomeroy Paradox On August 8, 1878, John Norton Pomeroy, the principal instruc- tor at the newly established Hastings College of Law in San Francisco, delivered the school's inaugural address. It was the culminating mo- ment of an exhilarating decade for California's legal profession. Six years earlier, in 1872, California had moved to the forefront of American legal reform by becoming one of the first states in the nation to codify its complete body of laws. The legislature had en- acted the California Code, which included new Civil, Criminal, and Political Codes, as well as a revised Code of Civil Procedure. Com- mittees of prominent attorneys had drafted the Code, basing it largely on the work of the illustrious New York jurist, David Dudley Field.' The centerpiece of the California Code was the Civil Code, which consolidated all of the state's statutory and common-law rules gov- erning private relations (corporations, property, torts, contracts, and domestic matters) into one meticulously arranged volume.2 Only * Associate, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C.
  • Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School 2014 Fiscal Year Summary • September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2014 081402 StanfordLaw_FYE_final_4C_v2.indd 1 12/1/14 10:20 AM Thank From the Dean I am delighted to share Stanford Law School’s 2014 Fiscal Year Summary. We are thriving as an institution due to the collective efforts of our community and the Yo u extraordinary generosity of our supporters. Thank you! Our small size continues to be a hallmark of the Stanford Law experience. Students have close connections to our world-class faculty, both inside and Our alumni, outside of the classroom. Our clinical program, which is now large enough parents, and to serve every member of the student body, is without peer. Students participate in a “legal residency,” working full-time for a quarter under the friends make supervision of our exceptional clinical faculty in one of 11 clinics. a profound We are always looking for ways to improve the Stanford Law School difference at experience. In order to better prepare our students for their futures, we Stanford Law have launched new initiatives in law and policy and global legal practice. In the Law and Policy Lab, which offered 22 practicums in its first year, School. More students have the opportunity to analyze policy problems for non-profit and than 50% of our government clients. Our global legal practice initiative includes a new, foundational course focused around complex case studies in a transnational setting, and annual budget opportunities for our students to enroll in short courses that occur in part overseas. relies on the We could not be the exceptional institution we are without your support.
  • C L a S S O F 2 0 2 1 G R a D U a T I

    C L a S S O F 2 0 2 1 G R a D U a T I

    CLASS OF 2021 GRADUATION STANFORD UNIVERSITY JUNE 12, 2021 SLS2:00 P.M. CLASSSLS OF 2021 GRADUATION TO THE MEMBERS, FRIENDS, AND FAMILIES OF THE CLASS OF 2021: Congratulations to the Class of 2021, which today joins a distinguished group of Stanford Law graduates whose history stretches back to 1893 when the fledgling Stanford University began its program in law. It is my honor to uphold Stanford’s tradition of excellence, which began that year when the university started teaching law and recruited its first law professors. One was Benjamin Harrison, former president of the United States, whom Governor Stanford invited to deliver a landmark series of lectures on the Constitution. The other was Nathan Abbott, who would head the nascent law program. Dean Abbott assembled around him a small faculty, and he imparted a standard of rigor and excellence that endures to this day. In 1895 the university conferred the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Law. The first graduate degree, a Master of Arts in Law, was introduced in 1901 and the equivalent of today’s professional Doctor of Jurisprudence (JD) degree was inaugurated as the Bachelor of Laws (LLB). Stanford Law School has since developed the degrees of Doctor of the Science of Law (JSD), Master of Legal Studies (MLS), Master of the Science of Law (JSM), Master of Laws (LLM), and 29 joint degrees. Following Abbott’s departure in 1907, the deanship was held successively by Frederic Woodward (1908-1916), Charles Huston (1916-1922), and Marion Rice Kirkwood (1922- 1945). During Dean Kirkwood’s tenure, the law school saw the successful introduction of a moot court program, the institution of the Stanford Law Association (forerunner of today’s alumni law societies), and the first directory of Stanford Law alumni.
  • Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School

    Stanford Law School 2016 FISCAL YEAR SUMMARY 9.1.2015 - 8.31.2016 Letter from the Dean Each year I have the honor of sharing the results of the Stanford Law School community’s collective generosity during the previous fiscal year. Last year, more than 3,400 alumni and friends made a gift to SLS. On behalf of all of us at the law school—faculty, students, and staff—thank you. Your gifts enable us to recruit and retain world-class faculty who are redefining fields from global law and business to health law to constitutional law; to provide generous financial aid so the best and brightest students can receive a Stanford legal education regardless of their ability to pay; and to build on the strength of our core curriculum through new interdisciplinary programs and We are Stanford Law. hands-on, experiential learning opportunities that better prepare our students to develop solutions to real-world problems. Problem Solvers. Leaders. Innovators. Your support provides the critical resources we need to maintain and expand cutting-edge teaching and research and to train the leaders of tomorrow. Thank you for your commitment to Stanford Law School. Sincerely, M. Elizabeth Magill Richard E. Lang Professor of Law and Dean Financial Overview 5% 6% Stanford Law School would not be the world-class institution it is without the philanthropic support of Library Student Services our alumni and friends. Every gift is an investment in our faculty, students, and programs, and together, Maintains library services and Enhances the student experience outside of research resources, including the classroom through services and activities, these gifts have an immediate and sustained impact on the school.