DOCSLIB.ORG

St. Peter's in the Vatican Edited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St. Peter's in the Vatican Edited Cambridge University Press 0521640962 - St. Peter’s in the Vatican Edited by William Tronzo Index More information INDEX Pages referring to figures are in italic. Augustine, 25, 29, 158 bust of Savior by, 223 Augustus, 26 canonization ceremony and, 251, 256, “Additional Observations” (Poleni), 109 257–8 aedicula (little building), 7, 8, 12 Baldacchino, 5, 229, 276, 280 Christ’s figure by, 217 africano marble, 21–2 bronze of, 120 colonnades of, 149 columns of, 40 crown of, 128 Constantine’s monument by, 159–74 agulia (needle), 23 first project as, 126f crossing piers by, 137–41 Alberti, Alberto, 39 perspective view of, 129 death and, 135 Alberti, Leon Battista, 16, 70 prototype of, 125–7, 129–30 divine intervention and, 161–6 Albertini, Francesco, 83 view of, 118, 123, 125 Greek inspiration for, 161 Alfarano, Tiberio, 2, 6, 16, 53, 54 view through, 111, 112 honorific medal of, 116 altar “wholistic” view of, 120 impact of, 111–12 baldachins, ciboria in, 114–16 baldachins, 233n16 light and, 172–3 columns of, 23, 36 in altars, 114–16 longevity of, 111 of Corpus Christi, 36 design of, 116–19 Michelangelo and, 230 problems of, 113–14 symbolism of, 119–20 nave decoration, spandrels by, 147 remaking of, 23 temporary, 120 Ponte Sant’Angelo and, 191–2, 194–209 Altar of the Holy Sacrament, 209–17, 210, Baldinucci, Filippo, 111 popes during, 232f 211, 212, 216, 219 balustrades Poussin’s art and, 163–4, 166, 236n98 angels in, 212–15, 213 on Ponte Sant’Angelo, 198 Sacrament altar by, 209–17 development of, 211 Bandinelli, Baccio, 186 sculptural studies of, 207 materials of, 215–16 Barberini, Cardinal Francesco, 50, 100 St. Peter’s consolidation, unification by, 116 study for, 214, 215, 218 Barbo, Pietro. See Pope Paul II tombs and, 130–1, 131–7 Amadei, 71 Barnes, T.D., 5 unity and, 229–30, 232n3 ambo Baronio, Cardinal, 13n6, 104 use of bronze by, 116–17 fragments of, 55 Barracco, Baron Giovanni, 50, 52 virtues and, 177–9 in St. Peter’s choir, 53–4 basilica water imagery and, 208–9 Andaloro, Maria, 58 additions, rebuildings of, 23–4 Bernini, Luigi, 139 Andrew, 140 facade renovation to, 55 Bianchi, Pietro, 286 angels fourth arm of, 103 Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 55 in Altar of Holy Sacrament, 212–15, 213 modernization of, 69 Blauuw, Sible de, 54 by Bernini, 205–8 St. Peter’s history and, 24–5 Blessed and Damned Souls, 217 on Ponte Sant’Angelo, 200–3, 205–8, 206f thresholds of, 27 Blood of Christ. See Sangue di Cristo Annals (Tacitus), 6 Basilica of Maxentius, 81 Book of Revelations, 1 Anselmi, Alessandra, 4 Battle of the Milvian Bridge, 188 Borghese, Cardinal, 40 Antonio di Pellegrino, 79 bazaar. See arcade Borghese, Paolo Giudotti, 251–2 Antonio di Pietro Averlino, 1, 64 Beccafumi, Domenico, 187 Borgo. See Urbs leonina apse bees, 232n9 Borromeo, Saint Carlo construction of, 79 symbolism of, 119–20, 136 canonization of, 251 Michelangelo’s changes to, 96 bell tower canonization theater for, 255 mosaic in, 49–50 current state of, 107 Borromini, Francesco, 94, 109, 110, 120, 220 papal figure in, 51 facade of, 106 Bernini rivalry with, 121–5 papal tombs in, 141 instability of, 105 Botticelli, 226 reconstruction of, 49 Beltrame de Martino, 71 Boulfroy, Abbe,´ 297 arcade, 290, 292, 302n114 Benediction Loggia, 1 Boullee,´ Etienne-Louis,´ 282–3 Archilochus, 136 Benjamin of Tudela, 35 metropolitan Church project of, 278–80 tomb of, 138 Bernini, Domenico, 167–8 Bourget, Bishop Ignace, 286 Aretino, Spinello, 191 Bernini, Gian Lorenzo, 4, 5, 94, 105, 106, Bowerstock, Glen, 3 Arma Christi, 200, 205 109, 110, 220 Braccio, Terzo, 156 Ars moriendi, 225, 234 Alexander VII’s tomb by, 174, 176–82 Bracciolini, Poggio, 83 atrium, 1 angels by, 205–8 Bramante, Donato, 2, 36, 67, 74, 89, 216, additions to, 23–4 architecture and, 234n52 275, 276 development of, 144 Art of Dying and, 224–5 architecture of, 80–2 pinecone fountain in, 25 baldachins’ design by, 116–19 changes to plan by, 77 relief in, 141 baroque additions of, 276–83 demolition by, 74 of St. Peter’s, 19 Borromini rivalry v., 121–5 dome project of, 79f 315 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521640962 - St. Peter’s in the Vatican Edited by William Tronzo Index More information 316 INDEX Bramante, Donato (cont.) Charlemagne, 107 construction genius of, 82 Charles V, 85, 186, 206 desertion of, 85 modernization of Nicholas’ plan by, 76 choir of St. Peter’s, 79–80 planning by, 75–8 ciborium for, 120 Conti, Lothar II, 49 Pope Julius II and, 74–5 of Pope Julius II, 78f Conversion of St. Paul, 170 Brenk, Beat, 29 in St. Peter’s, 119 Cornelio de Fine, 83 Bridge of Trial, 191–2, 209 Christern, Jurgen,¨ 29 coronation, 107–8 bronze pinecone. See pigna Christianity Corpus Christi Brunelleschi divine interventions of, 161–6 altar of, 37 choir of, 112–13 Medieval, 2 chapel of, 36, 37 Burckhardt, Jacob, 5, 70 unity of, 160–1 Corpus Domini, 149, 154, 181, 208 Burial of the Dead, 200 Church medal of, 159 attitude shift of, 112 procession of, 145, 150 Camera Apostolica, 73, 79 ciborium Cortona, Pietro da, 110, 210, 220 Canevari, Antonio, 110 in altar, 114–16 cottanello, 40 canonization, 264n1 for St. Peter’s choir, 120f Council of Trent, 189 of 1588, 245–8 Cigoli, Ludovico, 104 Counter-Reformation, 48 of 1610, 1622, 251–5 Cimabue, 58 crossing piers, 137–41 of 1669, 1670, 1690, 259–60 cipollino marble, 21, 29 integration of, 137 ceremony for, 244 columns of, 40 plan of, 139, 141 petitioners for, 266n34 circus statues for, 140 politics of, 253–4 religious significance of, 26 unified theme of, 137–9 theaters for, 244–69, 261 Claussen, Peter Cornelius, 54 Crucifixion, 227 canonization ceremony College of Cardinals, 111, 114 blood, water and, 227–8, 242n261, changes to, 247 Colonna, Marcantonio, 126 242n264 decoration for, 246, 250, 258, 267n45 Colonna, Marchese Filippo, 126 Crystal Palace, 288–9, 290, 292, 302n115 engravings of, 260–1 Colonna Santa, 20, 37 financing of, 252, 256, 257 relocation of, 36 De doctrina christiana, 25 papal role in, 244, 250–1, 254, 255–6 colonnades, 148, 149 death theaters for, 260, 262 design of, 144, 149, 150 theme of, 135, 135–6, 176, 179–80 The Canonization of Carlo Borromeo, 254 inscriptions of, 152–4 The Death of Moriens and the Intercession The Canonization of Diego of Alcala´, 249, 250 as “Mater Ecclesia,”157 with the Trinity of Christ and the Virgin, The Canonization of Raimondo of Penafort,˜ significance of, 150–1 226 251 symbolism of, 150 Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire The Canonization of S. Francesca Romana, theme of, 151–2 (Gibbon), 5, 7 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 253, 254 Colosseum, 154, 155 Deichmann, F.W., 29 Capella Paolina, 85 columns Descriptio Basilicae Vaticanae (Mallius), 35 capital of altar, 23 Descriptio Lateranensis Ecclesiae, 35 in Old St. Peter’s, 38 on altar of Corpus Christi, 36 Descrizione della basilica antica di S. Pietro in for St. Peter’s, 76 ancient, 130 Vaticano, 10 Capitol building, Washington, D.C. Apolline iconography of, 30 Destruction of Jerusalem (Poussin), 163, 171 dome of, 293–4 composition of, 28–9 Die Zeit Constantins des Grossen Capitulation of Henry IV before Gregory copies of, 130 (Burckhardt), 5 VIII, 145 discrepancies in, 27–8 Diego de Barrionuevo, 253 Cappella Clementina, 103, 104, 105, 109 dividing aisles, 22 Diego of Alcala´ work on, 103 importing of, 39 canonization of, 245–8 Cappella del Imperatore, 101 inspiration for, 127, 129 Divine Comedy, 192 Cappella del SS. Sacramento, 37 in Old St. Peter’s, 21–2 domes, 277–8 St. Francis altar in, 24 order of, 39 advancement in, 289 Cappella della Colonna, 101, 103 of outer screen, 37 Bramante’s project for, 79f Cappella di San Michele, 101, 103 porphyry, 33 changes to, 103 Cappella Gregoriana, 101, 103, 104, 105 rearrangement of, 23 construction of, 103–4 Cappella Sistina. See Sistine Chapel reuse of, 39 importance of, 289 Carpiceci, Alberto Carlo, 37 Solomonic origins of, 35–6 lesions in, 108 Carracci, Annibale, 111, 155, 229 twisted, 24, 30, 31, 36 as representational architecture, 80 Castel Sant’Angelo, 64, 182, 201 Confessio significance of, 101 siege, triumph, retribution of, 186–9 Innocent III additions to, 54 of St. Peter’s, 102 statues at, 195 pontifical auctoritas and, 54–5 domus Aguliae. See agulia Castelli-Borromini, Bernardo, 121, 122 Confraternity of John the Baptist Beheaded, Don Juan of Austria, 131 Cathedra Petri, 53, 155–9, 160, 161, 162, 181 188 Donation of Constantine, 5, 126, 172 Altar of the Holy Sacrament and, 211 Confraternity of the Good Death, 224 Dosio, Giovanni Antonio, 104 artifacts in, 157–8 Constans Duperac,´ Etienne, 30, 97 commemorative medal of, 162 St. Peter’s basilica and, 11–12, 13 elements of, 158 Constans II, 24 Ecclesia Militans, 247 view of, 113 Constantine Ecclesia Romana, 49, 52 Cathedral of Florence, 112 Bernini’s monument to, 159–74 apsidal mosaic and, 51 Cathedral of Saint-Jacques, 286 recorded donations of, 22 Egidio da Viterbo, 73, 75, 83 Cathedral of St. Isaac of Dalmatia, 284, 285 role of, 3 Elagabalus, 26 Cathedral of the Kazan Mother of God, 283, St. Peter and, 13 Elevation of a hemicycle for St. Peter’s, 96 283–4 St. Peter’s basilica and, 5–11, 12 Elevation of St. Peter’s from the south, 99 Cathedral of the Trinity, 284f statue of, 164, 165 engravings Catholic Church sun and, 26–7 of canonization ceremonies, 260–1 spiritual authority of, 273–4 Constantine and the Conversion of Europe equestrian monuments, 172, 173 St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MT Papal Intrigu Es Against Irish Liberty From
    M T PA PAL I N T R I GU ES AGAINST IRISH LIB ERT Y FROM H rri n IV D XIII d a . to ec . BY A MA IRE J MES G. GU , - EX J UDGE T HE SUPE I C OURT SAN A NC I SC C A LI NI A . OF R OR OF FR O . FOR T H I RD ED IT I O N. SAN FRANCISCO B AME . ARRY S 429 . j H , MONTGOMERY STREET 1 890 . Ifle la fl d a nd T he Po e p . A BRIEF HIST O RY OF PAPAL I NT R I GU ES AGAINST IRISH LIB ERT Y FROM H rfi n IV III . o X d a t . BY AMES G. MAGUIRE J , J UDGE T HE SUPE I C OURT SAN A NC I SC C A LI NI A OF R OR OF FR O , FOR . ' T /z R s r f must be be d e e e zp o ye . A D INA . C R L SIMEONI J . A e y , u in fl They can crush s as ages own. ’ What to them is a nation s angui sh ” more Nothing than a dying groan . UNA . OF T B l l SAN FRANCISCO R Y Y . B 429 . JAMES H A R , MONTGOMER STREET 1 888 . D D CA O N E I T I . To the heroes who , in spite of popes and kings , on r ish poured their blood the altar of I liberty , and fl thus kept alive the patriot ame , through the long ’ centuries of I rel and s night of slavery ; and to all the living priests and people who believe that I re land ’ s struggle for liberty should not be postponed to await the pleasure of any foreign potentate , this book is affectionately dedicated .
    [Show full text]
  • Gallieo and the Catholic Church
    Galileo and the Catholic Church PROF BOB DAVIS, DEPT OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION Galileo and the Catholic Church • Narrating the Galileo Affair • Understanding the nature of the conflict between Galileo and the Church authorities • Understanding its sequel and its legacy for the interaction of science and religion • Beyond simple dichotomies and stereotypes GALILEO: A Life in Context • 1564-92: Early years • 1616: Condemnation in Padua & Florence of Copernicanism (law of pendulum & • 1616-23: Controversy falling bodies) with Grassi • 1592-1610: Padua/ • 1623-32: Wrote Venice years (a Dialogue Copernican by 1597); • 1633: 2nd Trial use of telescope 1609 • 1633-42: Last years • 1616: 1st Trial under house arrest 3 The Church and Heliocentrism: Pope Paul V and the condemnation of 1616 • initial ecclesiastical sponsorship of Copernicus and the New Science––tacit approval through the reigns of nine popes • Heliocentrism first denounced by Protestant reformers Luther and Melanchton on biblical grounds: the attack on Kepler • Galileo in Rome (1611)––the ‘ridicule of the mathematicians’ v ‘the curiosity of the teachers’ (Clavius) • After receiving counsel from several theologians on the orthodoxy of heliocentrism, the Congregation of the Index officially condemned Copernicanism in 1616 as “false and as completely contradictory to Divine Scriptures.” Endorsed by Paul V, but only ‘for the prevention of the circulation of writings’ and refusing to term it ‘heresy’. • Donec corrigatur––permission for those ‘learned and skilful in the science’ to go on
    [Show full text]
  • The Pontifical Decrees Against the Doctrine of the Earth’S Movement and the Ultramontane Defence of Them
    The Pontifical Decrees Against the Doctrine of The Earth’s Movement and the Ultramontane Defence of Them By Rev. William W. Roberts (1885) Introductory commentary by a Catholic layman in 2002 1543 Nicolaus Copernicus published De Revolutionibus Orbium Cœlestium (On the Revolutions of Spheres). 1534-1549 Reign of Pope Paul III, who was quite aware of Fr. Copernicus’ work. The two were actually friends. 1605-1621 Reign of Pope Paul V, who issued a 1616 decree condemning pro-heliocentricity work of Galileo Galilei. 1623-1644 Reign of Pope Urban VIII, who issued a 2nd decree [1633] condemning Copernicanism. 1655-1657 Reign of Pope Alexander VII, who issued a Bull [1664] reinforcing that Copernicanism was heretical. 1740-1758 Reign of Pope Benedict XIV, who removed the Copernican books from the Index in 1740. 1846-1878 Reign of Pope Pius IX, who called Vatican Council [1869-70] wherein Papal Infallibility was defined. In 1870 the Vatican Council promulgated the dogma of Papal Infallibility. Until then, the infallibility of the Catholic Church’s teachings had never been defined explicitly although accepted by the Fathers throughout its history. This definition brought criticism from those outside the Church and even from some within. There were at least three reasons for this: (1) It decreed that God Himself dictated the teachings of the Catholic Church, a notion that other religions were prone to deny; (2) some did not want to elevate the papacy to an infallible level, even when declaring matters of faith and morals; (3) some believed the Church had erred on previous occasions and that therefore the definition was erroneous.
    [Show full text]
  • Papacy by Richard G
    Papacy by Richard G. Mann Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2005, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com The papacy is the monarchy by which the Roman Catholic Church is governed. The head of the Church is called papa--that is, father--in Latin because he is believed to be the spiritual parent of all the faithful. The Pope is entrusted with absolute authority over all aspects of the Catholic Church, including temporal as well as spiritual matters. Pope John Paul II (top) and his successor Like his immediate predecessor John Paul II, the current pope, Benedict XVI, fiercely Benedict XVI (above) denounces homosexual acts. Both John Paul and Benedict have claimed that their have vigorously declarations on homosexuality accord with papal pronouncements over the course of condemned homosexual many centuries. However, no popes prior to John Paul condemned same-sex love with acts. the vigor and consistency that he and Benedict have. Image of Pope Benedict XVI was created by Wikimedia Commons It was only in the twelfth century that popes began to encourage systematic contributor blues_brother enforcement of prohibitions against homosexual acts. Even after that time, the and appears under the papacy often revealed, in practice, a more tolerant attitude toward sexual "deviance" GNU Free than did secular authorities and the general membership of the Church. Among the Documentation License 1.2. popes, there are a few who can be described in modern terminology as being notably "gay friendly." In addition, at least four pontiffs seem to have enjoyed the physical, as well as spiritual, love of other men.
    [Show full text]
  • A BRIEF HISTORY of the PAPACY by John Judy (Written Mid-April
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE PAPACY By John Judy (Written mid-April 2005 for “Big News.”) MICHAEL Any day now the College of Cardinals will be choosing a new Pope. White smoke will billow out into Saint Peter's Square signaling that the Holy Mother Church has discovered fire. I'm kidding. The Catholic Church has long since acknowledged the existence of fire and has used it on more than a few occasions. If you don't believe me, ask a heretic. If you can find one! (Did I mention John Paul II once issued a formal apology to Prometheus? True story...) In any case, we Big News Catholics don't want the rest of you sinners to spend the next week in complete ignorance of our glorious heritage and the intricate, infallible goings- on of our higher-ups. With that in mind we now present a brief history of the papacy, or, as we call it: "The Vatican Highlight Reel!" MATT There have been 265 Popes since Jesus chose Saint Peter to be the rock on which he founded his church in 32 A.D. SAINT PETER Numero Uno, baby! Pearly gates in the house! MATT According to Catholic tradition, Peter brought Christianity to Rome although it was there well before Peter arrived. SAINT PETER We were in previews out of town, man. MATT And once he was in Rome, Peter didn't serve as any kind of bishop or leader. SAINT PETER It was casual. Why you doggin' me, Boo? MATT Saint Sixtus, the seventh Pope, was the first Pope known to be the son of a Priest.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome in Bernini's Footsteps
    Rome in Bernini’s Footsteps – La Voce di New York 11/25/17, 10:19 AM Roma bike tours - Choose the best guided tour Enjoy with us the squares, the monuments, and the streets of the genuine Rome. leadingroma.com Sections Close DONATE VNY PROUD Arts Commenta per primoShared: 6!"#$%& Rome in Bernini’s Footsteps Afer seeing ”Bernini” at the Villa Borghese, follow this itinerary to visit this exceptional artist's other masterpieces around Rome by Lucy Gordan Elephant and Obelisk by Bernini Nov 20 2017 At the Villa Borghese in Rome several of Bernini's sculptures are on permanent exhibit, but his heritage is to be found in more sites in Rome. An easier but not chronological route, which takes about 2 hours on foot (or by hopping on and off the no. 62 bus) not including visiting time, starts at the church of Santa Maria della Vittoria with his Ecstasy of St. Teresa and ends in St. Peter’s Square. Utilizziamo i cookie per offrirti servizi e informazioni in linea con le tue preferenze. Continuando a scorrere e a navigare ne consenti l'uso. OK Maggiori informazioni http://www.lavocedinewyork.com/en/arts/2017/11/20/rome-in-the-berninis-footsteps/ Page 1 of 10 Rome in Bernini’s Footsteps – La Voce di New York 11/25/17, 10:19 AM Gianlorenzo Bernini Gian Lorenzo Bernini, the most famous and important sculptor in 17th century Europe, but also a recognized architect, painter, events organizer, poet and playwright, was born in Naples on December 7, 1598 to a Mannerist sculptor, Pietro Bernini, originally from near Florence, and Angelica Galante, a Neapolitan, the sixth of their thirteen children.
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Utriusque Imperii Unitatem? Anastasius Bibliothecarius As a Broker Between Two Cultures and Three Courts in the Ninth Century
    Ad utriusque imperii unitatem? Anastasius Bibliothecarius as a Broker between Two Cultures and Three Courts in the Ninth Century Clemens Gantner* In 870, Anastasius, former (and later once again) librarian of the papal bibliotheca and chan- cellery, well-known erudite and former anti-pope, reached the pinnacle of his career as a diplomat. While exiled from Rome for a crime committed by his cousin, he was an important member of a mission sent to Constantinople by the Carolingian emperor and lord of Italy Louis II. He was sent there to negotiate a marriage alliance between Louis’s daughter and only surviving child Ermengard and a son of the upstart Byzantine emperor Basil I, which was ultimately to serve to bind the two empires together in the fight against the Saracens, southern Italy and Sicily. While there, Anastasius also joined the papal delegation at the Eighth Ecumenical Council, which was there in the pope’s stead to formally depose Patriarch Photius and negotiate the case of Bulgaria. We thus see Anastasius as a diplomat and cultural broker between Latin and Greek ecclesiastic and lay culture and between three courts. He composed a letter about his dealings in the East for Pope Hadrian II in 870, and thus we have an invaluable first-hand eyewitness account. While most negotiations started in 869 and 870 between the East and the West ultimately failed or were rendered pointless by political change, Anastasius shows us that 870 was a great chance for all sides. And while most parties involved lost something by the failure of the exchanges, Anastasius himself regained and kept a powerful position in the papal administration once again.
    [Show full text]
  • Composers and Music for Worship
    Composers and Music for Worship e don’t know who wrote a lot of the music notes, howling like dogs.” Bishops at the Council of Trent used in the early Church, and we have no worried about any music sung in parts, saying that “it idea who thought up most of the body of delights the ear more than the mind . .” Of course, they music called “Gregorian chant.” But we do also worried about cantors and choir members singing Wknow this: From its earliest days, the Church has needed monophonic music who “do not even know one note composers because, from its earliest days, the Church from another . and are in fact unskilled in any phase has sung its worship. of music.” When you write music for the Church, especially music New times and new musical styles have always brought that sets the liturgical texts, you face a challenging—even change in Church music and challenges to the status daunting—task. Certainly the music has to be good, but quo. When missionaries reached the Americas and the it has to do more. It has to express the text in a way that Far East in the sixteenth century, they affirmed the sung allows and even encourages people to sing these words nature of Catholic liturgy by adapting its music to fit the as prayer—and that’s a mighty challenge because people new situation. Pope Clement XII (1730–1740) permitted have different ideas about what prayer is and what it a new form of chant in “the Hispanias and India,”and sounds like, and so they have different ideas about what Pope Benedict XIV (1740–1758) had to come to terms with music best expresses prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ridale Family, Rather the De Ridales to Help Distinguish Them
    Marritt, S. (2011) The Ridale papal letters and royal charter: a twelfth- century Anglo-Scottish baronial family, the papacy, the law, and charter diplomatic. English Historical Review, CXXVI (523). pp. 1332-1354. ISSN 0013-8266 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/59664 Deposited on: 02 February 2012 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 The Ridale Papal Letters and Royal Charter: a Twelfth-century Anglo-Scottish Baronial Family, the Papacy, the Law, and Charter Diplomatic* Three original papal letters issued between 1156 and 1176 for the Ridale family concerning lands in Scotland and the North Riding of Yorkshire survive among the manuscripts of their descendants the Riddells of Whitefield, Hepple, Northumberland.1 The letters were well known in the nineteenth century but they have been little studied since, despite being amongst the earliest extant papal letters for a twelfth-century baronial family (indeed, the only Scottish examples) and, as a set of such documents, extraordinarily rare.2 As late as the 1820s, the Riddells also still held a King David I of Scotland charter granting Walter de Ridale land in Lilliesleaf and elsewhere in Teviotdale, Roxburghshire (1145x1153).3 It is now lost, but its text contains the earliest Scottish royal warrandice clause and one of the earliest Scottish references to tenure for a specified amount of knight service.4 Pope Adrian IV issued the first papal letter in 1156 for Walter’s brother Ansketill, confirming his possessions and especially Walter’s bequest to him by his testamentum of the Scottish estates. Such a bequest of land held by knight service to a secular beneficiary is another *I am very grateful to Professor Dauvit Broun and Dr Bryan Dick of the University of Glasgow for their advice and encouragement in the preparation of this article, to the readers for EHR for their perceptive suggestions, and to the staff of the Northumberland Collections Service at Woodhorn for their help with the manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Reasons from the Teachings of the Church for Wanting to Spend One Hour with Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament
    TWELVE REASONS FROM THE TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH FOR WANTING TO SPEND ONE HOUR WITH JESUS IN THE BLESSED SACRAMENT 1. You are greatly needed! “The Church and the world have a great need of Eucharistic Adoration.” (Pope John Paul 11 Dominicae Cenae) 2. This is a personal invitation to you from Jesus. “Jesus waits for us in this Sacrament of Love.” (Pope John Paul 11 Dominicae Cenae) 3. Jesus is counting on you because the Eucharist is the centre of life. “Every member of the church must be vigilant in seeing that the sacrament of Love shall be at the centre of the life of the people of God so that through all the manifestations of worship due him shall be given back for love and truly become the life of our souls.” 4. Your hour with Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament will repair for evils of the world and bring about peace or earth. “Let us be generous with our time in going to meet Jesus and ready to make reparation for the great evils of the world. Let your adoration never cease.” (Pope John Paul 11, Domini Canae) 5. Day and night Jesus dwells in the Blessed Sacrament because you are the most important person in the world to him! “Christ is reserved in our Churches as the spiritual centre of the heart of the community, the universal Church and all humanity, since within the veil of the species, Christ is contained, the Invisible Heart of the Church, the Redeemer of the world, the centre of all hearts, by Him all things are and of whom we exist.” (Pope Paul 1V) 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith & Reason
    FAITH & REASON THE JOURNAL OF CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE Summer 1977 | Vol. III No. 2 Galileo and the Magisterium: A Second Look Jeffrey A. Mirus The short note that follows does not purport to be an exhaustive reassessment of the Galileo case. Rather, in view of the importance of the topic for contemporary discussions involving the Magisterium, this note is presented as an editorial service. NE OF THE GREAT CLUBS USED TO PUNISH THE CHURCH IN THIS AGE OF PHYSICAL science has been the infamous and admittedly unfortunate 17th century Galileo case, the subject of song, story and dance since his time. It is said that the Church condemned as heretical Galileo’s belief that the earth moves around the sun. We are further told that Galileo was persecuted for pursuing that truth. Catholics have generally admitted the truth of these charges, but have resisted the next charge: that if the Church erred in declaring Galileo’s propositions heretical, it ought not to claim to be infallible. To this the traditional response has been two-fold, by those who believe the Magisterium of the Church pro- nounced against Galileo. On the one hand, it is argued that the Church has never claimed it made an infallible pronouncement in the Galileo case (the pope was not speaking infallibly). On the other, it is suggested that the Church has never claimed to be infallible in matters of science, but only in faith and morals. Both of these Catholic counter-arguments seem to me to be unsatisfactory. The latter argument fails because, in fact, if Galileo’s propositions were condemned, they were condemned precisely because they were hereti- cal or erroneous in faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Papal Overlordship and Protectio of the King, C.1000-1300
    1 PAPAL OVERLORDSHIP AND PROTECTIO OF THE KING, c.1000-1300 Benedict Wiedemann UCL Submitted for the degree of PhD in History 2017 2 I, Benedict Wiedemann, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Papal Overlordship and Protectio of the King, c.1000-1300 Abstract This thesis focuses on papal overlordship of monarchs in the middle ages. It examines the nature of alliances between popes and kings which have traditionally been called ‘feudal’ or – more recently – ‘protective’. Previous scholarship has assumed that there was a distinction between kingdoms under papal protection and kingdoms under papal overlordship. I argue that protection and feudal overlordship were distinct categories only from the later twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Before then, papal-royal alliances tended to be ad hoc and did not take on more general forms. At the beginning of the thirteenth century kingdoms started to be called ‘fiefs’ of the papacy. This new type of relationship came from England, when King John surrendered his kingdoms to the papacy in 1213. From then on this ‘feudal’ relationship was applied to the pope’s relationship with the king of Sicily. This new – more codified – feudal relationship seems to have been introduced to the papacy by the English royal court rather than by another source such as learned Italian jurists, as might have been expected. A common assumption about how papal overlordship worked is that it came about because of the active attempts of an over-mighty papacy to advance its power for its own sake.
    [Show full text]