DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2009 ––– Annual report 2009 Annual report 2009 1 a n n u a l r e p o r t 2 Five-year summary 3 Group overview 4 From the chairman 5 From the chief executive 6 Americas 7 Asia 8 Continental Europe, Middle East and Africa (CEMEA) 9 Economist.com 10 Roll Call Group 11 United Kingdom r e p o r t a n d a c c o u n t s 16 Directors 17 Trustees, Board and management committees 18 Directors’ report 22 Directors’ report on remuneration 25 Financial review 27 Auditors’ report 28 Consolidated profit and loss account 29 Consolidated balance sheet 30 Consolidated cashflow statement 31 Other statements 32 Principal accounting policies 35 Notes to the financial statements 59 Notice of annual general meeting The Economist Newspaper Limited registered number 236383 FRONT2009.indd 1 16/6/09 17:23:14 Net cashflow Earnings per share Comparison of indicative From operating activities Before exceptional £m share value and FTSE All Share items and disposals 60 pence The Economist FTSE All 160 Group, £ Share, ’000 50 140 25 5 ? 40 120 20 4 100 2 15 3 30 80 20 60 10 2 40 10 5 1 20 0 0 0 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 f i v e - y e a r s u m m a r y 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Profit and loss £m £m m £ £m £m Turnover 313 266 248 218 197 Operating profit 56 44 36 28 24 Non-operating exceptional items - 1 11 1 1 Profit on ordinary activities before finance income 56 45 47 29 25 Net finance income - 2 2 2 2 Profit before taxation 56 47 49 31 27 Profit after taxation 38 32 34 22 27 Balance sheet and cashflow Fixed assets 69 38 41 38 24 Net cash balance 13 20 31 55 73 Net current (liabilities)/assets (50) (48) (36) (5) 27 Long-term creditors and provisions (34) 2* (13) (29) (27) Net (liabilities)/assets (15) (8) (8) 4 24 Net cash inflow from operating activities 57 46 33 29 24 Margin and earnings per share 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Operating profit to turnover 17.8% 16.6% 14.6% 13.1% 12.4% Basic earnings per share 151.2p 128.7p 134.9p 88.4p 109.1p Earnings per share before non-operating exceptional items 151.2p 126.7p 105.2p 87.1p 84.9p Dividends and shares Final and interim dividends per share† 95.3p 79.7p 64.8p 59.0p 57.5p Special dividend per share - 91.3p 139.0p 79.4p - Total dividends per share† 95.3p 171.0p 203.8p 138.4p 57.5p Times covered (before non-operating exceptional items) 1.6 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.5 Indicative share value £19.75 £21.50 £20.50 £16.00 £14.00 * Balance includes surplus on defined benefit pension scheme. † For definition, see note 9 on page 40. FRONT2009.indd 2 16/6/09 17:23:15 r e v e n u e o p e r a t i n g o p e r a t i n g p r o f i t m a r g i n 3 517% 526% 51.2% to £313m to £56m to 17.8% g r o u p o v e r v i e w Group operating profit Group turnover Operating profit margin £m £m % 60 350 18 50 300 15 250 40 12 200 30 9 150 20 6 100 10 50 3 0 0 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Group revenue breakdown Turnover by regional business 2009 2009 Advertising Americas 136 117 CEMEA 82 Subscriptions/ circulation 124 £m £m United Kingdom Other 57 4 Sponsorship Other Roll Call Asia 26 27 businesses 20 33 The Economist global circulation Economist.com ABC audited average, July-December Total page views m m 1.4 350 1.3 300 1.2 250 1.1 1.0 200 0.9 150 0.8 100 0.7 50 0.6 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 FRONT2009.indd 3 16/6/09 17:23:15 the economist group has achieved another record operating profit. the year ahead will be challenging, but we are well placed to continue to outperform the market 4 OPERATING profit rose 26%, compared with the previous year, to £55.7m, on turnover up 17% at £312.8m. Profit before tax of £55.7m was up 18%. Net earnings were £37.9m, an 18% increase on last year’s £32.2m. Operating cashflow was £56.7m, an increase of £11.0m. The results were bolstered by the relative strength of the US dollar compared with the previous year. However, the results also include costs relating to restructuring the business with a more regional focus and the severance costs from a reduction in staffing f r o m t h e c h a i r m a n levels in the current economic climate. The Board is recommending a final dividend of 67.2p, 3% higher than last year, resulting in a dividend for the full year of 97.3p, an 8% rise over the previous year (excluding special dividend). The Group’s strong performance was led by The Economist itself, where circulation continued to rise (to 1,390,780) and our position in our advertising markets strengthened further. In July 2008 we bought Capitol Advantage, a business based in Washington, DC, which provides information and web services to help organisations mobilise grassroots activists. It has performed beyond expectations in the first months of our ownership. Most markets in which we operate are in economic turmoil, and these results show the strengths of our brands and our business. However, we will inevitably see significant pressure on advertising and sponsorship revenues in the coming year. That said, I believe that the Group will outperform its competition. The market in which Roll Call Group operates depends more on the amount of legislation before Congress, which is likely to be high given a new president and largely new Congress, than on the overall economy. The Economist is benefiting from a flight to quality among advertisers, its great relevance to readers and our business model, which emphasises “The Group’s strong performance was led by The Economist profitable circulation growth. I am itself, where circulation continued to rise” therefore confident that the Group will weather the current storm, even though we cannot expect to match the record results we have seen this year, while so many of the world’s major companies, on which much of our revenue depends, struggle. At the AGM, I shall step down from the Board after six years as chairman. I have greatly enjoyed my involvement with this remarkable company. There is no doubt in my mind that we can attract and retain many more talented people than would normally be possible for a company of this size. I refer here not only to the two exceptional chief executives with whom I have worked—Helen Alexander and, now, Andrew Rashbass—but to their management teams. The depth and quality of our editorial and management talent should reassure shareholders about future prospects, even in these turbulent times. Rupert Pennant-Rea will succeed me as chairman and needs no introduction to shareholders. He is not only a former editor, but is now a highly experienced businessman. I wish him and the Group every success in the future. robert wilson FRONT2009.indd 4 16/6/09 17:23:16 the group’s results show the quality and relevance of our brands and the exceptional commitment and skills of the people who work here. the year ahead will be tough, but we are well placed to improve our competitive position 5 IT HAS been a year of progress in many areas. At The Economist, worldwide circulation rose 6.4% in the year to 1,390,780. John Micklethwait observes: “Editorially, the year was dominated by the economic crisis. Much of our coverage was dictated by the dramatic weekly news, but we used our covers to spotlight the underlying trends such as the collapse of manufacturing, the debt crisis in eastern Europe and the emerging debate about the future f r o m t h e c h i e f of capitalism. The global nature of the crisis played to our strengths, e x e c u t i v e and our finance and economics team won a string of awards. Our endorsement of Barack Obama garnered huge interest. In Britain we campaigned against the extension of Heathrow. We began a new Asia column called Banyan, who, like his peers—Charlemagne, Lexington, Bagehot and Buttonwood—now has a blog online. This reflects the beginning of a quiet revolution within the editorial department: the integration of print and online teams.” We are making Economist.com the place for intelligent discussion on the web. For example, we have run debates on the effectiveness of carbon offsets and on whether brand America will regain its shine. This is resonating with readers and advertisers, with page views up 53% year-on-year and advertising revenue up 29%. Organisations increasingly look to the research capabilities of the Economist Intelligence Unit to help them operate more effectively as they investigate where to invest and how to grow. An example is the recently- launched forecasting service on China’s provinces.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Gender-Pay-Gap Report
    Gender pay gap report 2020 Gender pay gap report 2020 Foreword The Economist Group is committed to being an organisation that promotes belonging and aims to have a Group culture that reflects inclusivity, diversity, and excellence. In our fourth year of reporting, the UK data shows a great improvement at the mean and, more importantly, at the median, where our gender pay gap has improved by one-third this year. The analysis indicates that changes in practices and policies, as described at the end of the report, have resulted in the improvement in the numbers. We have consistently reduced the fixed pay gap over the last three years with major improvements in the proportion of women recruited in higher paid roles (see page 6). However, we are far from parity and men still dominate the top quartile for pay despite the Group employing similar numbers of women and men. We are pleased to be making progress, and we are committed to the critical work ahead. We recognise the gender pay gap is still significant, and we are working to change it. Lara Boro Chief Executive March 2021 2 Gender pay gap report 2020 1. The UK gender pay gap (as per UK Government reporting guidelines) On the snapshot date of 5th April 2020, the Group employed 751 people in the UK (364 women and 387 men), mainly in London and Birmingham including editorial colleagues, marketing, research, sales, technology, consultancy, head office and support functions. Gender pay gap Women’s hourly pay rate* vs men’s Our gender pay gap has improved by one-third this year.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Mining
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Mining Enterprises and Regional Economic Development: An Exploratory Analysis of the Sustainable Development Model Nicolas Di Boscio Thesis submitted to the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, March 2010 Declaration I certify that this thesis is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, as far as I know, infringe the rights of any third party. I wish to extend my thanks to Rio Tinto for the data and material provided and for their support throughout the investigation. As a Rio Tinto employee at the time of writing, I declare that no attempt to interfere with this work or to influence the results of this research has been made by the company or any of its employees. All the views and conclusions put forward are solely my own and do not necessarily represent those of the corporation. 1 Table of contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 12 Chapter 1 - New developments in growth theory ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    In pursuit of progress since Annual report 2020 report Annual Annual report 2020 In pursuit of progress since Annual report 2020 report Annual Annual report 2020 CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT STRATEGIC REPORT 2 Five-year summary 3 Group overview 4 From the chairman 6 From the chief executive 8 From the editor 9 Business review: the year in detail 13 The Economist Educational Foundation 15 The Economist Group and environmental sustainability 17 Corporate governance: the Wates Principles, our Section 172(1) statement and our guiding principles REPORT AND ACCOUNTS GOVERNANCE 22 Directors 23 Executive team 24 Trustees, board committees 25 Directors’ report 28 Directors’ report on remuneration 31 Financial review CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 35 Independent auditor’s report to the members of The Economist Newspaper Limited 38 Consolidated income statement 39 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 40 Consolidated balance sheet 41 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 42 Consolidated cashflow statement 44 Notes to the consolidated financial statements COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 94 Company balance sheet 95 Company statement of changes in equity 96 Notes to the company financial statements NOTICES 108 Notice of annual general meeting 1 STRATEGIC REPORT Five-year summary 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 £m £m £m £m £m Income statement—continuing business* Revenue 326 333 329 303 282 Operating profit 31 31 38 43 47 Profit after taxation 21 25 28 39 37 Profit on sale of CQ-Roll Call, Inc - 43 - - - Profit on sale of Economist Complex - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper No. 163
    Working Paper No. 163 Liberation technology: Mobile phones and political mobilization in Africa by Marco Manacorda and Andrea Tesei | April 2016 1 Afrobarometer Working Papers Working Paper No. 163 Liberation technology: Mobile phones and political mobilization in Africa by Marco Manacorda and Andrea Tesei | April 2016 Marco Manacorda is a professor at Queen Mary University of London, a CEP (LSE) research associate, and a CEPR research fellow. Email: [email protected]. Andrea Tesei is a lecturer at Queen Mary University of London and a CEP (LSE) research associate. Email: [email protected]. Abstract Can digital information and communication technology (ICT) foster mass political mobilization? We use a novel geo-referenced dataset for the entire African continent between 1998 and 2012 on the coverage of mobile phone signal together with geo-referenced data from multiple sources on the occurrence of protests and on individual participation in protests to bring this argument to empirical scrutiny. We find that mobile phones are instrumental to mass mobilization during economic downturns, when reasons for grievance emerge and the cost of participation falls. Estimated effects are if anything larger once we use an instrumental variable approach that relies on differential trends in coverage across areas with different incidence of lightning strikes. The results are in line with insights from a network model with imperfect information and strategic complementarities in protest provision. Mobile phones make individuals more responsive to both changes in economic conditions – a mechanism that we ascribe to enhanced information – and to their neighbours’ participation – a mechanism that we ascribe to enhanced coordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Undermining the Rights and Safety of Workers
    Dirty Metals Undermining the Rights and Safety of Workers Mineworker in South Africa / n October 9, 2003, the south face of the Grasberg gold mine in West Papua, Indonesia, collapsed. OEight workers died and five others were injured. Government investigators turned up evidence that in the days leading up to the accident, seismic data had led mine operators to suspect that slippage was immi- nent, and that key machinery—but not workers—had been moved from below the unstable zone. These were not the first deaths at the Grasberg mine, the largest open-pit gold mine in the world. In May 2000, a landslide at the mine’s waste dump claimed four lives, prompting environmentalists and government Photo: ICEM officials to question the safety of recent production increases.46 In 1983, the chief safety engineer of an unnamed South Rock falls, tunnel collapses, fires, heat exhaustion, and African mining corporation told the Economist that “produc- other dangers claim the lives of over 15,000 miners every tion is more important than safety.” No one in a similar posi- year. (Miners in the notoriously dangerous coal mines of tion would go on record with such a statement today. And it China may account for up to half of these deaths.) is true that over the past 20 years, health and safety condi- According to the International Labour Organization (ILO), tions have improved in large-scale corporate operations in deaths within the mining sector as a whole (both metals most countries. Between 1984 and 2001, for instance, the and coal) account for 5 percent of all worker deaths on the average annual death rate in South African gold mines fell job, even though the sector employs just under 1 percent of from 1.23 per 1,000 workers to 1.05 per 1,000, while the all workers worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Licensing Agreement
    TERMS AND CONDITIONS: INTEGRATED LICENSING AGREEMENT These Terms and Conditions form part of the Agreement between The Economist Group and Client and refer to words defined in the Integrated Licensing Agreement (or any agreement in which these terms are incorporated by reference). 1. Payment Terms All fees expressed herein are exclusive of sales tax, value added tax, or any other taxes and duties which, if applicable, will be charged to Client in addition to the fees. In addition to the fees, Client will be responsible for the payment of any withholding taxes that may be payable. Travel expenses are not included in the fee(s) and, if such charges are incurred, they will also be charged to Client in addition to the fees. All fees are non- refundable (except as otherwise specified herein) and are due within net 30 days of the invoice date. Payments made after the due date may be (in The Economist Group’s discretion) subject to a late fee equal to the lesser of 1.5% per month or the maximum allowed by law. 2. Licence of Trademarks 2.1 Where The Economist Group gives approval in writing in advance, The Economist Group grants to Client a non-exclusive, non-sub-licensable licence (during the term of this Agreement) to use the “Economist Intelligence Unit”, “Economist Events”, “Economist Films” or “(E) BrandConnect” (as applicable) name and/or logo, for the purpose only of: (i) promoting and marketing the Event(s), or (ii) attributing the Deliverables to Economist Films, Economist Events, EIU or (E) BrandConnect (as applicable) in accordance with this Agreement, PROVIDED THAT in each case (a) these trademarks will only be used in the exact format and specification as directed from time to time by The Economist Group, (b) all advertising, promotional, marketing and other material which feature the trademarks (in any medium or media) will be subject to the prior review by and written approval of The Economist Group before their publication or use, and (c) Client will not modify, amend or add to the content or format of any of the licensed trademarks in any manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Lords' Interests
    REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS _________________ The following Members of the House of Lords have registered relevant interests under the code of conduct: ABERDARE, LORD Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Director, F.C.M. Limited (recording rights) Category 10: Non-financial interests (c) Trustee, National Library of Wales (interest ceased 31 March 2021) Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Trustee, Stephen Dodgson Trust (promotes continued awareness/performance of works of composer Stephen Dodgson) Chairman and Trustee, Berlioz Sesquicentenary Committee (music) Director, UK Focused Ultrasound Foundation (charitable company limited by guarantee) Chairman and Trustee, Berlioz Society Trustee, West Wycombe Charitable Trust ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA, BARONESS Nil No registrable interests ADDINGTON, LORD Category 1: Directorships Chairman, Microlink PC (UK) Ltd (computing and software) Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Director and Trustee, The Atlas Foundation (registered charity; seeks to improve lives of disadvantaged people across the world) Category 10: Non-financial interests (d) President (formerly Vice President), British Dyslexia Association Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Vice President, UK Sports Association Vice President, Lakenham Hewitt Rugby Club (interest ceased 30 November 2020) ADEBOWALE, LORD Category 1: Directorships Director, Leadership in Mind Ltd (business activities; certain income from services provided personally by the member is or will be paid to this company; see category 4(a)) Director, Visionable
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    The Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square London E14 4QW Telephone 020 7576 8000 Fax 020 7576 8500 www.eiu.com Press release Press enquiries Joanne McKenna: +44 (0)20 7576 8188 or [email protected] For immediate release: Asking better questions of data boosts performance, says Economist Intelligence Unit report An ability to ask better questions of data is central to driving better business outcomes, according to In search of insight and foresight: Getting more out of big data, an Economist Intelligence Unit report, sponsored by Oracle and Intel. According to a global EIU survey for this report, the vast majority of executives agree that asking better questions of data has already improved their organisation’s performance and will continue to lift it in the coming years. Nevertheless, many companies struggle to use data to gain insight into their business—and foresight into how best to move it forward. Lessons from successful firms reveal that achieving insight and foresight requires crafting savvy questions that test smart hypotheses, both of which are best fostered by open corporate cultures that prize data and its exploration. Other key findings include: • Focusing on a business outcome is crucial, yet a struggle for most companies. Defining, agreeing on and gearing data analyses towards clear, specific and relevant business objectives is difficult for many companies and a critical obstacle to translating data into insights, results and competitive advantage. Executives overwhelmingly consider predictions (70%) the most critical type of data insight for C-level decisions, followed by insights into trends (43%). • The main challenges are people-related.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Rothschild/Soros Clan Lost Huge Investment in China's Ouster of Bo Xilai More Below Bilderber Timeline, Rothsch / China
    NewsFollowUp.com Obama / CIA Franklin Scandal Omaha pictorial Index sitemap home Canada North American Union? ... Secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North Your browser does not support inline frames or American Union. ... is currently configured not to display inline controlled by frames. corporations ... no accountability. go to Immigration page WMR: Bilderberg Rothschild/Soros clan lost huge Timeline, Rothschild Canada investment in / China Your browser does not China's ouster of support inline frames or is currently configured not to Bo Xilai more display inline frames. below America for sale, How does this tie into NAU? North American Union Politics Resources related topics related topics related topics Environment Economics De-regulation Indigenous Rights Immigration Pharmaceuticals Labor Latin America Taxes War Global Collectivism PROGRESSIVE REFERENCE CONSERVATIVE* Americas American Society of International Law, see also Accenture formerly Andersen Consulting, see Amnesty International ECOSOC on North American Union. Enron, Kenneth Lay, Jeffrey Skilling, Bush from Canadians.org Deep Integration of U.S. and Center for North American Studies, American Accuracy in Media portrays NAU as a left-wing Canadian economies regulation, standards University, Professor Robert Pastor, said to be conspiracy ..."AIM has previously documented governing health, food safety, father of NAU, and his book "Towards a North that Pastor's campaign for a North American wages. Harmonization process a demand
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual report 2007/2008 This is a free translation into English of a report issued in the French language and fi led with the “Autorité des marchés fi nanciers” on August 1, 2008. This translation is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking readers and shareholders. This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and regulatory standards applicable in France. Combined annual general meeting dated September 29th, 2008 02 Message from the Chairman of the Executive Board 04 Key fi gures 06 Historical data for the last three years 1. GENERAL OVERVIEW 11 The Group 17 Shareholders’ guide 23 Banking activities 37 Private equity 2. LEGAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION 57 Report of the Executive Board 97 Consolidated fi nancial statements 175 Individual fi nancial statements 201 Resolutions The 2007/2008 Þ nancial year saw the completion of a major restructuring of the Rothschild Group: the reuniÞ cation of worldwide banking activities. The long-term sustainability, independence and stability of the share ownership and 01 family control of Paris Orléans were enhanced through the creation of Rothschild Concordia, the controlling shareholder of Paris Orléans. MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD 02 Dear shareholders, As announced in the press on 17 July 2007, The strategy refl ecting the family shareholders’ common 2007/2008 marked the successful completion of goal to create a major group is now bearing fruit. The a major restructuring of the Rothschild group. This Group’s infl uence and reputation are underpinned by move, consisting of grouping the banking activities at the quality of its people and the standing of its clients a global level, had been long sought and awaited by as well as by a corporate culture that values innovation, the markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Rainbow
    Chasing the rainbow A survey of South Africa April 8th 2006 Republication, copying or redistribution by any means is expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of The Economist The Economist April 8th 2006 A survey of South Africa 1 Chasing the rainbow Also in this section From revolution to evolution The ANC is becoming a more ordinary party. Page 3 Africa’s hegemon Thabo Mbeki’s many foreign-policy successes, and his one big failure. Page 4 Righting the wrongs of apartheid But armative action has its limitations. Page 6 Ladders out of poverty No education, no future. Page 7 The view from the shacks Since the end of apartheid, South Africa has moved closer to Miserable but not quite hopeless. Page 8 becoming the rainbow nation of Nelson Mandela’s vision. But not nearly close enough yet, says Richard Cockett All together now N THE 12 years since the African National leviate the poverty and degradation of the Public-private partnerships have worked ICongress (ANC) party triumphantly victims of apartheid without resorting to wonders in ghting crime. Page 9 took power in South Africa’s rst multi- counterproductive populism. Despite racial democratic election, there have been inheriting an economic mess from the out- plenty of reasons to be disappointed, even going National Party in 1994, the post- Keep chasing disillusioned, with Africa. The aid dar- apartheid government has managed to If South Africa pursues its rainbow vigorously lings of the West have come and gone. build 1.9m new homes, connect 4.5m enough, it may nd a pot of gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    Annual report 2018 Annual report 2018 ARCOVER2018_NEW.indd 1 18/06/2018 12:53 Countries - Places mentioned in The Economist United s s s States London mentioned in The s s s Economist Brazil Equator s s s Britain Nigeria South Africa s s s Germany Iran s s s Number India mentions , , , of Russia s s s China Australia Japan The bubbles are sized to the number of mentions of city and country names in The Economist’s archives from -, and chart the newspaper’s growing global reach throughout its history. ARCOVER_INSIDE2.indd 1 18/06/2018 12:12 CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT STRATEGIC REPORT 3 Five-year summary 4 Group overview 5 From the chairman 6 From the chief executive 7 From the editor 8 Business report REPORT AND ACCOUNTS GOVERNANCE 16 Directors 17 Trustees, Board committees 18 Executive team 19 Directors’ report 23 Directors’ report on remuneration 26 Financial review CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 29 Independent auditor’s report to the members of The Economist Newspaper Limited 32 Consolidated income statement 33 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 34 Consolidated balance sheet 35 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 36 Consolidated cashflow statement 38 Notes to the consolidated financial statements COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 80 Company balance sheet 81 Company statement of changes in equity 82 Notes to the company financial statements NOTICES 94 Notice of annual general meeting 1 FRONT2018.indd 1 20/06/2018 15:39 FRONT2018.indd 2 20/06/2018 15:14 STRATEGIC REPORT Five-year summary IFRS UK GAAP 2018 2017 2016 2015
    [Show full text]