DOCSLIB.ORG

Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance Evidence and Case Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance Evidence and Case Studies FORENSIC SCIENCE AND BEYOND: AUTHENTICITY, PROVENANCE AND ASSURANCE EVIDENCE AND CASE STUDIES l l l l l l l Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015 Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance Evidence and Case Studies This volume comprises chapters which form the evidence for the Government Chief Scientific Adviser’s Annual Report 2015, together with illustrative case studies. It should be cited as: Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015: Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance. Evidence and Case Studies. The Government Office for Science would like to thank the authors who contributed evidence chapters, case studies and their time towards this report and gave it freely. This report is intended for: Policymakers, legislators, and a wide range of business people, professionals, researchers and other individuals whose interests include the use of forensic analysis within the Criminal Justice System through to authenticity, provenance and assurance in the provision of goods and services. The report project team was Martin Glasspool, Richard Meadows, Lindsay Taylor, Adam Trigg and Jenny Wooldridge. This report consists of contributions received from academia and industry and others outside of government. The views expressed do not represent policy of any government or organisation. This report is presented in two parts. The first is the summary report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser. This was developed as a result of seminars and the advice of the experts who provided the source of the evidence. The second part, the evidence, has been gathered from and written by a distinguished group of experts. The evidence takes two forms: chapters that consider a major aspect of the forensic landscape; and individual case studies that illuminate points of detail and principle. The evidence section provides the views of the experts themselves, who met on several occasions during the preparation of the report and had the opportunity to help to develop the narrative and to comment on each other’s contributions. The Government Chief Scientific Adviser is responsible and accountable for the summary report, and the experts for their individual contributions to the evidence papers and case studies. Neither should be blamed for the sins and omissions of the other! FOREWORD My second annual report explores new and emerging forensic techniques so that policy makers can ensure they are developed and used for the benefi t of the UK. It covers four main areas: ● An overview of the UK’s forensic science landscape from the perspective of its users ● The changing nature of crime (including cybercrime), examining how forensic science can predict, deter and overtake it ● The forensic application of analytical science beyond the court system ● The steps required to secure the UK’s forensic science sector for the long term, with particular attention to innovation and new market opportunities. In producing the report, I have drawn on the knowledge of a range of experts and academics. They have provided a clear evidence base for each of these four areas. This volume presents that body of evidence, as well as illustrative case studies. The chapters and case studies herein represent the authors’ personal views rather than those of the Government Offi ce for Science, but their insights – for which I am greatly indebted – have fundamentally informed the messages and questions raised in my report. Sir Mark Walport Government Chief Scientifi c Adviser December 2015 CONTENTS SECTION 1: The forensic science landscape CHAPTER 1: FORENSIC SCIENCE IN CONTEXT 12 Dr Angela Gallop, Axiom International Ltd Karen Squibb-Williams, Acorn Chambers DNA ANALYSIS 17 Dr Susan Pope, Director of DNA Principal Forensics Ltd A PARADIGM SHIFT IN UK FORENSIC SCIENCE 20 Professor Niamh Nic Daeid, Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee CHAPTER 2: FORENSIC SCIENCE IN PRACTICE 24 Gary Pugh, Director of Forensic Services at the Metropolitan Police Service THE POLICYMAKER’S PERSPECTIVE 27 Amanda Cooper, SRO Digital Policing and Science, Home Office THE COMMERCIAL PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVE 29 Roger Robson, Managing Director of Forensic Access FORENSIC SCIENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION 30 Dr Geraldine Fahy, University of Kent CHAPTER 3: ASSURANCE – STANDARDS, VALIDATION AND ACCREDITATION 32 Dr Josephine Bunch, National Physical Laboratory UKAS ACCREDITATION: PROVIDING CONFIDENCE IN FORENSIC SCIENCE 34 Malcolm Hynd, External Affairs Manager, UK Accreditation Service CHAPTER 4: COGNITIVE AND HUMAN FACTORS 40 Dr Itiel Dror, University College London (UCL) and Cognitive Consultants International (CCI-HQ) STATISTICS IN COURT 50 Dr David Lagnado, University College London, with contributions from Professor Colin Aitken, University of Edinburgh SECTION 2: The changing nature of crime CHAPTER 5: THE CHANGING NATURE OF CRIME 56 Pete Merrill, Head of Science & Innovation, National Crime Agency TROJAN OPENS THE GATES TO COMPANY CASH 62 Oliver Smith, PwC Cyber Threat Operations CHAPTER 6: IDENTITY AND IDENTIFICATION 64 Professor Sue Black, Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee SUPERIDENTITY 68 Dr Sarah Stevenage, University of Southampton 71 MANAGING BIOMETRICS Isabelle Moeller, Chief Executive, Biometrics Institute 73 EMERGING BIOMETRICS IN THE COURTROOM Dr Lucina Hackman, Dr Chris Rynn and Dr Helen Meadows, Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee 74 CHAPTER 7: CYBER FORENSICS Professor Andrew Blyth, University of South Wales Matthew Johnson, Chief Technology Officer, Guardtime 80 CHILD ABUSE IMAGE DATABASE Chris Felton, Safeguarding Directorate’s Online and Digital Lead, Home Office 82 CHAPTER 8: THE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE Professor Tim Wilson, Northumbria Centre for Evidence and Criminal Justice Studies, Northumbria University 90 DISASTER VICTIM IDENTIFICATION: MH17 Detective Superintendent Jen Williams, National Civil Contingencies and Disaster Victim Identification Coordinator, National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) 92 FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA Dr Cerys Rees, Head of Chemical and Biological Analysis and Attribution, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) 94 WILDLIFE CRIME Dr Lucy Webster, Wildlife Forensic Scientist, Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA) 96 CHAPTER 9: DESIGNING OUT CRIME Nick Ross, Chairman, UCL Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science 100 ETHICS IN FORENSIC SCIENCE Chris Hughes, Chair of the National DNA Database Ethics Group 102 DESIGNING OUT MOBILE PHONE CRIME Nick Ross, Chairman, UCL Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science 105 TRENDS IN VEHICLE CRIME Mike Briggs, Crime Research Manager at Thatcham Research SECTION 3: Forensic science: beyond the court 110 CHAPTER 10: AUTHENTICITY AND PROVENANCE Dr Derek Craston, Government Chemist, LGC 112 NUCLEAR FORENSICS Dr Vladimír Šucha, Professor Maria Betti and Dr Klaus Lützenkirchen Joint Research Centre, European Commission 116 PROVENANCE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS Dr Daniel Thomas, Nuclear Threat Reduction, AWE FORENSIC GEOSCIENCE 118 Professor Lorna Dawson, Head of the Soil Forensic Group, James Hutton Institute Dr Ruth Morgan, Director of the UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences NOTIONS OF PURITY: AN ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 120 Professor Francesca Bray, Social Anthropology, University of Edinburgh CHAPTER 11: FOOD AND DRINK 122 Dr Vladimír Šucha, Professor Elke Anklam and Professor Franz Ulberth, Joint Research Centre, European Commission SCOTCH WHISKY: AUTHENTICITY, PROVENANCE AND ASSURANCE 125 Julie Hesketh-Laird, Deputy Chief Executive, Scotch Whisky Association STOPPING FOOD FRAUD 129 Sue Davies, Chief Policy Adviser, Which? EXPLOITING THE MICROBIOME 130 Paul Brereton, Head of Agri-food Research, Fera Science Ltd. CHAPTER 12: COUNTERFEIT PHARMACEUTICALS AND METHODS TO TEST THEM 132 Dr Harparkash Kaur, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine OPERATION PANGEA 138 Gift Minta, Senior Criminal Intelligence Analyst, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency THE COUNTERFEITING OF HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS 140 David A Tainsh, Chief Product Quality Officer Nisha Mistry, Senior Investigator (R&D), GlaxoSmithKline CHAPTER 13: CONSUMER PRODUCTS 142 Melissa Dring, Director of Policy Robyn Ellison, Policy Officer, Chartered Trading Standards Institute MAKING THE MOST OF TRADING STANDARDS SERVICES 143 Melissa Dring, Director of Policy, Chartered Trading Standards Institute Robyn Ellison, Policy Officer, Chartered Trading Standards Institute CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SOCIAL MEDIA 147 Mike Andrews, National Trading Standards eCrime Team BLOCK CHAIN – AUTHENTICITY AND PROVENANCE 148 Jessi Baker, CEO of Project Provenance Ltd CHAPTER 14: ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS 150 Professor Ian L Boyd, Chief Scientific Adviser, Defra ENVIRONMENTAL DNA ANALYSIS FOR WILDLIFE CONSERVATION 152 Dr Peter Brotherton, Director of Specialist Services and Programmes, Natural England SECTION 4: Securing the future of UK forensic science 162 CHAPTER 15: FUTURE APPROACHES IN ANALYTICAL SCIENCES Dr Steve Bleay Dr Neil Cohen Dr Barbara Daniel, Head of Forensic Science Unit, King’s College London Ian Elkins, Crown Prosecution Service Professor Dick Lacey Shaun Mallinson, Partnerships and Funding Coordinator, CAST Nick McCoy, Head of Forensic Services, Warwickshire Police and West Mercia Police Pete Merrill, Head of Sciences, National Crime Agency Kevin Morton, Director of Regional Scientific Support Services, Yorkshire and the Humber 166 SKILLS AND COMPETENCY FOR THE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evidencing the Impact of Neighbourhood Watch
    UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science Evidencing the impact of Neighbourhood Watch Evidencing the impact of Neighbourhood Watch Lisa Tompson, Jyoti Belur and Nikola Giorgiou University College London Contact details: Dr Lisa Tompson Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ. Tel: 020 3108 3126 Email: [email protected] 1 UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science Evidencing the impact of Neighbourhood Watch Table of Contents 1. Background ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Methods .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. The impact of Neighbourhood Watch ................................................................................... 4 3.1 How Neighbourhood Watch might impact on crime ................................................................. 5 3.1.1 Manipulating the environment to reduce opportunities for crime........................................ 5 Dissemination of crime prevention advice .......................................................................................... 6 Mobilising guardians .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Social control mechanisms ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Annual Report 2003/2004 The academic year 2003/2004 was marked by continued excellence in research, teaching and outreach, in service of humanity’s intellectual, social and technological needs. President and Provost’s Outreach Statement In accordance with its UCL is committed to founding principles, UCL using its excellence in continued to share the research and teaching highest quality research to enrich society’s art, and teaching with those intellectual, cultural, who could most benefit scientific, economic, from it, regardless of environmental and their background or medical spheres. circumstances. See page 2 See page 8 Research & Teaching Achievements UCL continued to UCL’s academics challenge the boundaries conducted pioneering of knowledge through its work at the forefront programmes of research, of their disciplines while ensuring that the during this year. most promising students See page 12 could benefit from its intense research-led teaching environment. See page 4 The UCL Community Developing UCL UCL’s staff, students, With the help of its alumni and members of supporters, UCL is Council form a community investing in facilities which works closely fit for the finest research together to achieve and teaching in decades the university’s goals. to come. See page 18 See page 24 Contacting UCL Supporting UCL Join the many current UCL pays tribute to and former students and those individuals and staff, friends, businesses, organisations who funding councils and have made substantial agencies, governments, financial contributions foundations, trusts and in support of its research charities that are and teaching. involved with UCL. See page 22 See page 25 Financial Information UCL’s annual income has grown by almost 30 per cent in the last five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Research Programme 1995-2008
    Review of the Defra Biodiversity Research Programme 1995-2008 28 and 29 September 2009 Innovation Centre, Reading VENUE AND HOTEL LOCATION DETAILS Royal County Hotel Review Meeting Venue: INNOVATION CENTRE, READING 5th Floor, Northgate House, 21 - 23 Valpy Street, Reading, RG1 1AR, Tel: 0118 955 7800 There are a limited number of parking spaces available at the Innovation Centre. If you need to reserve a car parking space please phone 0118 955 7800 or e-mail [email protected] If you are traveling by car you may wish to use Reading’s Park & Ride facilities http://www.parkandride.net/reading/reading_frameset.html Information for other Reading car parks can be found at http://www.city- visitor.com/reading/carparks.html • Directions from Reading Railway Station (5 minutes walk from Innovation Centre) • Exit the platforms via the main barriers. If you arrive on platforms 5-9, you will need to go over the bridge and down the escalator. The Railair exit is closest to the Centre. • Railair exit (by station M&S) go down the stairs and cross over the Railair pick up and then cross at the traffic lights. Turn left towards roundabout then right into Blagrave Street. Immediately cross over the road towards Aldwych House. Continue up Blagrave Street taking the first left into Valpy Street. The Innovation Centre at North Gate House is the last building on left hand side. i • Main exit (by station WHSmiths) – If you leave the station here (no stairs), you will exit onto Station Hill. Turn left and skirt the outside of the Station, you will pass the Railair pick up, then see instructions above.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance
    Edinburgh Research Explorer ‘Notions of purity Citation for published version: Bray, F 2015, '‘Notions of purity: an anthropological perspective’' Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015. Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance. , pp. 120- 122. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forensic-science-and-beyond> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015. Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance. Publisher Rights Statement: Open Government Licence v3.0 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 FORENSIC SCIENCE AND BEYOND: AUTHENTICITY, PROVENANCE AND ASSURANCE EVIDENCE AND CASE STUDIES l l l l l l l Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015 Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance Evidence and Case Studies This volume comprises chapters which form the evidence for the Government Chief Scientific Adviser’s Annual Report 2015, together with illustrative case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review Protocol for Crime Trends Facilitated by Synthetic Biology Mariam Elgabry1,2 , Darren Nesbeth2 and Shane D
    Elgabry et al. Systematic Reviews (2020) 9:22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1284-1 PROTOCOL Open Access A systematic review protocol for crime trends facilitated by synthetic biology Mariam Elgabry1,2 , Darren Nesbeth2 and Shane D. Johnson1* Abstract Background: When new technologies are developed, it is common for their crime and security implications to be overlooked or given inadequate attention, which can lead to a ‘crime harvest’. Potential methods for the criminal exploitation of biotechnology need to be understood to assess their impact, evaluate current policies and interventions and inform the allocation of limited resources efficiently. Recent studies have illustrated some of the security implications of biotechnology, with outcomes of misuse ranging from compromised computers using malware stored in synthesised DNA, infringement of intellectual property on biological matter, synthesis of new threatening viruses, ‘genetic genocide,’ and the exploitation of food markets with genetically modified crops. However, there exists no synthesis of this information, and no formal quality assessment of the current evidence. This review therefore aims to establish what current and/or predicted crimes have been reported as a result of biotechnology. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted to identify relevant literature. ProQuest, Web of Science, MEDLINE and USENIX will be searched utilizing a predefined search string, and Backward and Forward searches. Grey literature will be identified by searching the official UK Government website (www.gov.uk) and the Global database of Dissertations and Theses. The review will be conducted by screening title/abstracts followed by full texts, utilising pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers will be managed using Eppi-center Reviewer 4 software, and data will be organised using a data extraction table using a descriptive coding tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science
    Review of Research and Development in Forensic Science: Other responses Contents-Other responses Organisation Name Response Type ACPO Substantive Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Substantive Analytical Services International Ltd Response on behalf of Analytical Services International Ltd both as an academic researcher and a forensic service provider Association of Forensic Service Providers' Body Substantive Fluid Forum CCL Forensics Substantive Cellmark Forensic Services Substantive Crown Prosecution Service Substantive DSTL Substantive Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine Substantive Forensic Access Ltd. Substantive Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spetrometry Substantive (FIRMS) Network Forensic Science Northern Ireland Substantive Forensic Science Service 1 Substantive Forensic Science Service 2 Substantive Forensic Science Society Substantive Forensic Telecommunication Services Ltd Substantive Forensic Working Group for the Partnership Substantive against Wildlife Crime Freelance Scientists (but aligned to universities) Substantive Home Office Scientific Development Branch Substantive (name changed to Centre for Applied Science and Technology in April 2011) Intellect (trade association for the IT, telecoms Substantive and electronics industries) LGC Forensics Substantive LTG Executive Committee Substantive The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen Substantive National DNA Database Ethics Group Substantive National Physical Laboratory Substantive National Policing Improvement Agency Substantive Natural History Museum Substantive Prospect
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Contestability in the Public Service Economy Gary L
    Diversity and Contestability in the Public Service Economy Gary L. Sturgess Invigorating business Call 13 26 96 nswbusinesschamber.com.au NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS OLIVIER JOB INDEX NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER OLIVIER JOB INDEX NSW NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUBLIC SERVICE ECONOMY NS NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER DIVERSITY AND CONTESTABILITY PUB AND Gary L. Sturgess is Adjunct Professor of Public Service Delivery at the Australian School PUBLICof SERVICE Business (University ECONOMY of NSW), based NSW at the Australia BUSINESS and New Zealand CHAMBER School of DIVERSITY Government. He also holds an Adjunct Professorship with the School of Government DIVERSITYand Public AND Policy CONTESTABILITY at Griffith University.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing a Geospatial Predictive Policing Strategy
    TESTING A GEOSPATIAL PREDICTIVE POLICING STRATEGY: APPLICATION OF ARCGIS 3D ANALYST TOOLS FOR FORECASTING COMMISSION OF RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES By SOLMAZ AMIRI A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF DESIGN WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY School of Design and Construction DECEMBER 2014 © Copyright by SOLMAZ AMIRI, 2014 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by SOLMAZ AMIRI, 2014 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation/thesis of SOLMAZ AMIRI find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ___________________________________ Kerry R Brooks, Ph.D., Chair ___________________________________ Bryan Vila, Ph.D. ___________________________________ Kenn Daratha, Ph.D. ___________________________________ David Wang, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee for their guidance, understanding, patience and support during my studies at Washington State University. I would like to gratefully and sincerely thank Dr. Kerry Brooks for accepting to direct this dissertation. Dr. Brooks introduced me to the fields of geographic information systems and scientific studies of cities, and helped me with every aspect of my research. He asked me questions to help me think harder, spent endless time reviewing and proofreading my papers and supported me during the difficult times in my research. Without his encouragements, continuous guidance and insight, I could not have finished this dissertation. I am grateful to Dr. Bryan Vila for joining my committee. Dr. Vila put a great deal of time to help me understand ecology of crime and environmental criminology. I showed up at his office without having scheduled a prior appointment, and he was always willing to help.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY IMPACT UNIT: OUR FIRST TWO YEARS Policy Impact Unit: Our Frst Two Years Policy Impact Unit: Our Frst Two Years | 1
    POLICY IMPACT UNIT: OUR FIRST TWO YEARS Policy Impact Unit: Our frst two years Policy Impact Unit: Our frst two years | 1 FOREWORDS Forewards 1 PIU in numbers: the frst two years 2 About the PIU 3 Our approach 4 Why engineers? 6 Why STEaPP? 7 The team 8 Credit: Shaun Waldie Summary of activity 9 At UCL, generating positive societal impacts is central to In 1827, UCL founded the frst laboratory in the world Highlights 10 our mission of being a world-leading research university. devoted to engineering education. Over 190 years later, we The value of our academic excellence lies in how we are are still at the cutting edge of the discipline, home to some Gender and the Internet of Things 11 able to inform and infuence the world around us, from of the most successful engineering departments in the UK. Future Targeted Healthcare Manufacturing Hub 14 academic impact to impact on policy professionals and the At its heart, engineering is about fnding practical solutions Vax-Hub 16 global community. In transforming discovery into practice, to problems. Our aim is to change the world and our Dawes Centre for Future Crime 18 we are able to fulfl our mission of being a force for good researchers are tackling some of the world’s biggest Neuromorphic Computing 20 and enabling people to live healthier, more sustainable lives. problems – from improving medical treatments, to tackling climate change, to keeping people safe online. Of course, Other activities 22 Our institutional Public Policy Strategy sets out our vision this year, the COVID-19 pandemic has been an important Training 22 for embedding public policy engagement across UCL focus for many researchers across the faculty and the role Pilot projects 22 in order to bring cross-disciplinary expertise to bear on of science and engineering advice to government has been Global Policy Fellows 22 public policy challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth and Policy, No
    YOUTH &POLICY No. 108 MARCH 2012 Young People, Welfare Reform and Social Insecurity Buses from Beirut: Young People, Bus Travel and Anti-Social Behaviour Participation and Activism: Young people shaping their worlds John Dewey and Experiential Learning: Developing the theory of youth work Home Alone? Practitioners’ Reflections on the Implications of Young People Living Alone Thinking Space: An Institute for Youth Work? Reviews Editorial Group Ruth Gilchrist, Tracey Hodgson, Tony Jeffs, Dino Saldajeno, Mark Smith, Jean Spence, Naomi Stanton, Tania de St Croix, Tom Wylie. Associate Editors Priscilla Alderson, Institute of Education, London Sally Baker, The Open University Simon Bradford, Brunel University Judith Bessant, RMIT University, Australia Lesley Buckland, YMCA George Williams College Bob Coles, University of York John Holmes, Newman College, Birmingham Sue Mansfield, University of Dundee Gill Millar, South West Regional Youth Work Adviser Susan Morgan, University of Ulster Jon Ord, University College of St Mark and St John Jenny Pearce, University of Bedfordshire John Pitts, University of Bedfordshire Keith Popple, London South Bank University John Rose, Consultant Kalbir Shukra, Goldsmiths, University of London Tony Taylor, IDYW Joyce Walker, University of Minnesota, USA Aniela Wenham, University of York Anna Whalen, Freelance Consultant Published by Youth & Policy, ‘Burnbrae’, Black Lane, Blaydon Burn, Blaydon on Tyne NE21 6DX. www.youthandpolicy.org Copyright: Youth & Policy The views expressed in the journal remain those of the authors and not necessarily those of the editorial group. Whilst every effort is made to check factual information, the Editorial Group is not responsible for errors in the material published in the journal. ii Youth & Policy No.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Plant Science Research Strategy a Green Roadmap for the Next Ten Years Contents
    UK PLANT SCIENCE RESEARCH STRATEGY A GREEN ROADMAP FOR THE NEXT TEN YEARS CONTENTS Foreword . 1 Introduction . 3 Context . 4 Deliverables . .5 1 Securing. a Pipeline of Transformative Discoveries . 5 2 Strategic. Research to Solve Grand Challenges . .8 3 Innovation. 11 4 Diverse. People and Skills . .18 5 National. Infrastructure . 20 6 International. Landscape . .21 List of Recommendations . 23 Appendix 1: List of people consulted . .25 FOREWORD In many ways the idea of a national strategy I also held a workshop with twenty independent is counterintuitive – science is global and research fellows . I am extremely grateful to more than ever we need to be working across everyone who gave their time and thoughtful national boundaries to solve the enormous input during a very challenging period of environmental and societal challenges that we national lockdown . The issues we discussed face . However, to collaborate more effectively in revolved around what plant science research the international arena we first need increased can and should contribute to society, and what investment and better co-ordination across the mechanisms are needed to ensure effective UK . In April 2020, following discussions with delivery of those contributions . After the colleagues, I proposed a community-driven consultation, I distilled many pages of informal approach to develop a plant science research notes into a two page summary of the core strategy for the UK . I engaged with no personal messages that would underpin the strategy . In or professional agenda, no vested interest and the second phase, this summary was circulated an open mind1 . Melanie Welham, Executive to all consultees, with a request to consult more Chair of the UK Biotechnology and Biological widely within their local constituency and to Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), part feedback any further comments .
    [Show full text]
  • Principles for UK Research Institutes May 2018
    Principles for UK Research Institutes May 2018 The UK has a strong history of excellence in science and research, and a wide variety of kinds of research endeavours have contributed to this. Research institutes have played a valuable role, with their different models and functions increasing the diversity of the research landscape. In recent years a number of institutes have been established as a result of collaborations between multiple funders and universities, to advance the UK’s capacity in particular areas of research. The creation of UKRI presents an opportunity to consider how this model fits into the wider landscape of institutes, and what key principles, based on previous experience, can support the establishment of future institutes.1 The history of research institutes There is a wide variety of research institutions that can be seen as ‘institutes’, and their typical functions have evolved over time. National facilities have long been in existence, with the British Geological Survey dating back to 1835 and the National Physical Laboratory to 1900. Over the 20th century, a number of institutes were established to advance research in a particular field; these were typically either standalone or research council-funded institutes or were based at a university. Following this, in the early 21st century, institutes with other, strategic functions have been developed: those with coordinating functions (such as the National Cancer Research Institute) and Catapult Centres, funded by Innovate UK, which have more applied functions, in line with the Government’s focus on the economic potential of research. More recently, in the last few years, there have been a number of collaborations between multiple universities and funders to pool their resources and bring talented researchers together (physically or virtually) through the creation of institutes (for example the Alan Turing Institute and Henry Royce Institute).
    [Show full text]