DOCSLIB.ORG

Rapport 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rapport 2019 Rapport 2019 Qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles MINISTERE DE LA SANTE DIRECTION DE LA SANTE CENTRE D’HYGIENE ET DE SALUBRITE PUBLIQUE Rapport téléchargeable sur le site internet : www.hygiene-publique.gov.pf Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles – Année 2019 REMERCIEMENTS Le Centre d’Hygiène et de Salubrité Publique (CHSP) remercie l’ensemble des communes de la Polynésie française qui ont contribué à l’élaboration de ce rapport pour la mise à jour de leurs données sur les réseaux et leur programme de travaux. Ces remerciements vont également aux organismes publics et privés suivants pour leur efficace collaboration : - le Syndicat pour la Promotion des Communes de Polynésie française (SPCPF), - la Direction de l’Ingénierie Publique (DIP), - la Subdivision Administrative des Tuamotu-Gambier (SATG), - la Polynésienne des Eaux. Les renseignements qui ont été communiqués au CHSP concernant les descriptifs des divers réseaux publics et l’ensemble des travaux réalisés et programmés afin d’améliorer la qualité des eaux distribuées, ont été très précieux dans le cadre de la réalisation de ce « Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles de l’année 2019 ». La rédaction de ce bilan a pour objectif non seulement d’informer la population de la qualité de l’eau distribuée mais aussi d’évaluer régulièrement le résultat des efforts financiers et techniques apportés par l’Etat, le Pays et les Communes pour permettre la distribution d’une eau potable à tous. 2 Centre d’Hygiène et de Salubrité Publique (CHSP) – Avril 2020 www.hygiene-publique.gov.pf Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles – Année 2019 SOMMAIRE RÉSUMÉ CHIFFRÉ ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 AVANT-PROPOS : LES OUTILS D’AIDE A L’AMELIORATION DE LA QUALITE DE L’EAU ....................12 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................................13 1 ORGANISATION DU CONTROLE SANITAIRE DES EAUX DESTINEES A LA CONSOMMATION HUMAINE.....14 1.1 CADRE REGLEMENTAIRE.............................................................................................................................................. 14 1.2 ACTIONS MENEES PAR LE CENTRE D’HYGIENE ET DE SALUBRITE PUBLIQUE .................................................. 15 1.2.1 Les contrôles du CHSP ...........................................................................................................................15 1.2.2 Les interventions du CHSP .....................................................................................................................17 1.3 AUTOCONTROLE DES COMMUNES ............................................................................................................................. 17 1.3.1 Autocontrôle des eaux brutes ..................................................................................................................17 1.3.2 Autocontrôle des eaux distribuées...........................................................................................................17 2 SITUATION PAR COMMUNE ...............................................................................................................................19 2.1 COMMUNES ET ORGANISMES AYANT REALISE LEUR PROGRAMME D’AUTOCONTROLE ................................. 20 2.1.1 Papeete ....................................................................................................................................................20 2.1.2 Syndicat Intercommunal Te Oropaa - Réseau Punaruu ..........................................................................22 2.1.3 Faa’a ........................................................................................................................................................23 2.1.4 Punaauia ..................................................................................................................................................26 2.1.5 Paea .........................................................................................................................................................28 2.1.6 Papara ......................................................................................................................................................31 2.1.7 Pirae ........................................................................................................................................................33 2.1.8 Arue ........................................................................................................................................................35 2.1.9 Mahina ....................................................................................................................................................37 2.1.10 Taiarapu Est .............................................................................................................................................40 2.1.11 Bora-Bora ................................................................................................................................................43 2.1.12 Huahine ...................................................................................................................................................46 2.1.13 Tahaa .......................................................................................................................................................48 2.1.14 Tumaraa ...................................................................................................................................................51 2.1.15 Uturoa ......................................................................................................................................................53 2.1.16 Rimatara ..................................................................................................................................................55 2.1.17 Rurutu ......................................................................................................................................................57 2.1.18 Tubuai......................................................................................................................................................60 2.2 COMMUNES AYANT REALISE PARTIELLEMENT LEUR PROGRAMME D’AUTOCONTROLE ................................ 62 2.2.1 Communes pouvant être classées grâce aux contrôles réalisés par le CHSP ..........................................62 2.2.1.1 Moorea ...........................................................................................................................................62 2.2.2 Communes ne pouvant pas être classées faute d’un nombre suffisant de contrôles ................................68 2.2.2.1 Taputapuatea ..................................................................................................................................68 2.2.2.2 Nuku Hiva ......................................................................................................................................70 Cas des Fontaines publiques des Tuamotu (à carte prépayée) .............................................................................73 2.2.2.3 Anaa ...............................................................................................................................................73 2.2.2.4 Arutua .............................................................................................................................................74 2.2.2.5 Hao .................................................................................................................................................75 2.2.2.6 Manihi ............................................................................................................................................75 2.2.2.7 Puka Puka .......................................................................................................................................76 2.3 COMMUNES N’AYANT PAS REALISE LEUR PROGRAMME D’AUTOCONTROLE .................................................... 77 2.3.1 Communes pouvant être classées grâce aux contrôles réalisés par le CHSP ..........................................77 2.3.1.1 Teva I Uta .......................................................................................................................................77 2.3.1.2 Hitiaa O Te Ra ................................................................................................................................80 2.3.1.3 Taiarapu Ouest ...............................................................................................................................82 2.3.2 Communes ne pouvant pas être classées faute d’autocontrôle ................................................................84 3 Centre d’Hygiène et de Salubrité Publique (CHSP) – Avril 2020 www.hygiene-publique.gov.pf Rapport sur la qualité des eaux destinées à la consommation humaine à Tahiti et dans les îles – Année 2019 2.3.2.1 Maupiti ...........................................................................................................................................84 2.3.2.2 Raivavae .........................................................................................................................................86
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Répartition De La Population En Polynésie Française En 2017
    Répartition de la population en Polynésie française en 2017 PIRAE ARUE Paopao Teavaro Hatiheu PAPEETE Papetoai A r c h MAHINA i p e l d FAA'A HITIAA O TE RA e s NUKU HIVA M a UA HUKA r q PUNAAUIA u HIVA OA i TAIARAPU-EST UA POU s Taiohae Taipivai e PAEA TA HUATA s NUKU HIVA Haapiti Afareaitu FATU HIVA Atuona PAPARA TEVA I UTA MOO REA TAIARAPU-OUEST A r c h i p e l d Puamau TAHITI e s T MANIHI u a HIVA OA Hipu RA NGIROA m Iripau TA KAROA PUKA P UKA o NA PUKA Hakahau Faaaha t u Tapuamu d e l a S o c i é MAKEMO FANGATA U - p e l t é h i BORA BORA G c a Haamene r MAUPITI Ruutia A TA HA A ARUTUA m HUAHINE FAKARAVA b TATAKOTO i Niua Vaitoare RAIATEA e TAHITI r TAHAA ANAA RE AO Hakamaii MOORE A - HIK UE RU Fare Maeva MAIAO UA POU Faie HA O NUKUTAVAKE Fitii Apataki Tefarerii Maroe TUREIA Haapu Parea RIMATARA RURUTU A r c h Arutua HUAHINE i p e TUBUAI l d e s GAMBIE R Faanui Anau RA IVAVAE A u s Kaukura t r Nombre a l AR UTUA d'individus e s Taahuaia Moerai Mataura Nunue 20 000 Mataiva RA PA BOR A B OR A 10 000 Avera Tikehau 7 000 Rangiroa Hauti 3 500 Mahu Makatea 1 000 RURUT U TUBUAI RANGIROA ´ 0 110 Km So u r c e : Re c en se m en t d e la p o p u la ti o n 2 0 1 7 - IS P F -I N SE E Répartition de la population aux Îles Du Vent en 2017 TAHITI MAHINA Paopao Papetoai ARUE PAPEETE PIRAE HITIAA O TE RA FAAA Teavaro Tiarei Mahaena Haapiti PUNAAUIA Afareaitu Hitiaa Papenoo MOOREA 0 2 Km Faaone PAEA Papeari TAIARAPU-EST Mataiea Afaahiti Pueu Toahotu Nombre PAPARA d'individus TEVA I UTA Tautira 20 000 Vairao 15 000 13 000 Teahupoo 10 000 TAIARAPU-OUEST
    [Show full text]
  • 16 04 06 Bulletin
    Polynésie française K1 : U23, Juniors Open, Masters Dames & Hommes Ia Orana i TAHITI NUI After the extraordinary success of the 2nd ICF World Championship in October 2015 the Tahitian Kayak Federation could not stop right there. With a solid organisation background, a bid document to host a World Cup has been approved by ICF Board Directors Once again Tahiti Nui will have the opportunity and privilege to share to the world its legendary land of hospitality, culture and its “savoir-faire” in term of Sports organizer. After Portugal and Mauritius Islands, Tahiti Nui, on the same Race course of the World Championship, will host the 3rd lap of ICF Ocean Racing Worl Cup and also the 1st OCA Oceania Ocean Racing. What another big challenge for a small Island lost in the middle of the Pacific. That challenge will be fulfill with your strong participation. A Faatoito anae no te maitai o the Va’a Initia Te Aroha ia Rahi Charles VILLIERME Président de la Fédération Tahitienne de Kayak Membre de l’Exécutif de l’Oceania Canoé Association || TAHITI FRENCH POLYNESIA || LOCATION || A TROPICAL CLIMATE The island of Tahiti in the Society Islands group, is situated half way between The French Polynesian islands enjoy a tropical climate; the maximum numbers of hours of sunshine is close to 3000 per year in the Tuamotu Atoll, one of the highest in the world ! California (6200km) and Australia (5700km). The temperature which is relatively constant, is cooled by the trade winds of the Pacific that Tahiti’s 118 fabulous islands are scattered across five far-flung archipelagos, each blow throughout the year, with their own particular character and whose inhabitants have adapted the ancient The average ambient temperature is 27 °C, and the waters of the lagoons area fairly constant rhythms of the ocean and the sun to the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit University of Hawai'i at Manoa
    COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 (808) 956-82 18 Technical Report 111 STUDY AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ALIEN INVASIVE TREE MICONIA CALVESCENS DC. (MELASTOMATACEAE) IN THE ISLANDS OF RAIATEA AND TAHAA (SOCIETY ISLANDS, FRENCH POLYNESIA): 1992-1996. Jean-Yves Meyer "* and Jeitn-Pierre Malct 3 1 DClCgation ii la Recherche, B.P. 20981 Papecte, Tahiti, French Polynesia 2~niversityof Hawai'i at Manna, Dcl,artment of Botany, Honolulu, HI 96822, U.S.A. 3 Service du DCveloppment Rural, 2&meSectcur Agricole, B.P. 13 Uturoa, Ri~iatea, French Polynesia February 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 1 ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 A. Problems occurring in alien invasive plant management 2 B. A study case: Miconia calvescens in the Society Islands 4 C. Interests and objectives of the study 7 MATERIAL AND METHODS 8 A. The study sites : the islands of Raiatea and Tahaa 8 B. History of the introduction and extension of M. calvescens 9 C. Management strategy and control methods 10 1. Control strategy 10 2. Control methods 11 3. Human resources 12 4. Information and education 13 5. Duration 14 D. Monitoring the evolution of M. calvescens populations 14 1. Distribution maps 14 2. Permanent plots 15 3. Botanical relev6 before and after control 15 4. Population structure before control 15 5. Regeneration after control 16 6. Vegetative growth after control 16 7. Age of first reproduction 16 8. Longevity and size of the soil seed bank after control 17 RESULTS 18 A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fisheries Industry of French Polynesia 4
    SOUTH PAC/FH I THE FISHERIES INDUSTRY OF FRENCH POLYNESIA 4 by H, van Pel Fisheries Officer South Pacific Commission and L, C. Devambez Assistant Fisheries Officer South Pacific Commission Noumea South Pacific Commission 1957 U*~Mo'- ^-^ INTRODUCTION 1 GEOGRAPHY General ., .. 1 Tahiti and Moorea .. .. 2 Raiatea, Tahaa, Bora Bora 2 Takaroa, Takapoto ., , 2 Meteorological data 3 THE EXISTING FISHERIES INDUSTRY General , 3 Tahiti Cannery 5 Imports of canned fish, crustaceans and molluscs (Table i). .. 6 Mother of Pearl shell exports (Table II) 6 Production of Mother of Pearl Shell - Tuamotu/Gambier area (Table III) 7 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Tahiti 10 Fish Consumption (Table IV) 14 Trochus niloticus 17 Fish Culture in Ponds 19 Raiatea 19 Tahaa 20 Bora Bora .. 20 Moorea .. .. 20 Tuamotu Islands - Mother of Pearl Oyster 21 Takaroa and Takapoto , 22 Trochus 28 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS A. Fish - Oysters - Crustacea 29 B. Mother of Pearl Oysters „ 29 C. Trochus .. .. 29 METEOROLOGICAL DATA APPENDIX I LIBRARY (i) SOUTH Pi 4., L t S * A HK YY T^4EE FISHERIES INDUSTRY OF FRENCH POLYNESIA SOUTH PACcinr"i ! COMM"SSiC'N INTRODUCTION At the request of the Administration of French Polynesia, we nade a general investigation of fisheries in Tahiti, Moorea, Raiatea, Tahaa and Bora Bora in the Society Islands, and in the atolls of Takaroa and Takapoto in the Tuamotou archipelago . The above-mentioned islands were reached by seaplane or by ship, and local investigations were conducted using small boats and motorcars. The keenest interest in the survey and some very helpful encouragement was expressed by His Excellency the Governor of French Polynesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Labellisés CLCE Au 30 Novembre 2017 Arue Faaa
    Liste des Labellisés CLCE au 30 novembre 2017 TAHITI Arue ➢ DOMOTEC Contact : CHOUGUES Gilles 87 78 15 35 40 45 34 07 [email protected] Courrier : BP 14717 – 98701 ARUE Faaa 1 ➢ 987 ELEC Contact : WATANABE Otis 87 78 43 22 : 40 82 30 71 [email protected] Courrier : BP 61609 – 98702FAA’A ➢ ARESO Contact : MOUSSET Laurent 87 70 73 42 [email protected] Courrier : BP 61781 – 98704 FAA’A Centre ➢ ELEC 220 Contact : HERLEMME Mickael 87 74 73 09 [email protected] Courrier : BP 3341 – 98717 Punaauia Association Centre Label et Contrôle Electrique Téléphone : 40 47 27 72 Liste des Labellisés CLCE au 30 novembre 2017 ➢ TEARATAI UIRA Contact : KONG YEK FHAN Christian 87 72 59 21 [email protected] Courrier : BP 6129 – 98704 FAA’A ➢ TECHNO FROID Contact : LANVIN Jérôme 40 80 04 05 40 80 04 09 [email protected] Courrier : BP 50354 – 98716 PIRAE Contact : TEHURITAUA Marc ➢ TEHURITAUA & FILS 2 87 77 36 21 [email protected] Courrier : BP 6276 – 98702 FAA’A Mahina ➢ A.E.S ELECTRICITE Contact : MICHON Nicolas 87 34 34 87 [email protected] Courrier : BP 90124 Motu Uta – 98715 Papeete ➢ POLY RESEAUX CONCEPT Contact : OPUTU John 87 34 63 24 [email protected] Association Centre Label et Contrôle Electrique Téléphone : 40 47 27 72 Liste des Labellisés CLCE au 30 novembre 2017 Paea ➢ ELECTRICITE ET RESEAUX DE Contact : LALANDEC Patrick TAHITI (ERDT) 87 77 09 83 / 87 78 75 31 40 50 79 41 [email protected] Courrier : BP 50131 – 98716 PIRAE ➢ WES ELEC Contact : BUTSCHER Wesley 89 72 78 31 / 87 75 08 15 40 81 34 66 [email protected] / [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • TAHITI NUI Tu-Nui-Ae-I-Te-Atua
    TAHITI NUI Tu-nui-ae-i-te-atua. Pomare I (1802). ii TAHITI NUI Change and Survival in French Polynesia 1767–1945 COLIN NEWBURY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF HAWAII HONOLULU Open Access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 In- ternational (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits readers to freely download and share the work in print or electronic format for non-commercial purposes, so long as credit is given to the author. Derivative works and commercial uses require per- mission from the publisher. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The Cre- ative Commons license described above does not apply to any material that is separately copyrighted. Open Access ISBNs: 9780824880323 (PDF) 9780824880330 (EPUB) This version created: 17 May, 2019 Please visit www.hawaiiopen.org for more Open Access works from University of Hawai‘i Press. Copyright © 1980 by The University Press of Hawaii All rights reserved. For Father Patrick O’Reilly, Bibliographer of the Pacific CONTENTS Dedication vi Illustrations ix Tables x Preface xi Chapter 1 THE MARKET AT MATAVAI BAY 1 The Terms of Trade 3 Territorial Politics 14 Chapter 2 THE EVANGELICAL IMPACT 31 Revelation and Revolution 33 New Institutions 44 Churches and Chiefs 56 Chapter 3 THE MARKET EXPANDED 68 The Middlemen 72 The Catholic Challenge 87 Chapter 4 OCCUPATION AND RESISTANCE 94 Governor Bruat’s War 105 Governor Lavaud’s
    [Show full text]
  • Islander Perceptions of Invasive Alien Species: the Role of Socio- Economy and Culture in Small Isolated Islands of French Polynesia (South Pacific)
    J.-Y. Meyer and M. Fourdrigniez Meyer, J.-Y. and M. Fourdrigniez. Islander perceptions of invasive alien species: the role of socio- economy and culture in small isolated islands of French Polynesia (South Pacific) Islander perceptions of invasive alien species: the role of socio- economy and culture in small isolated islands of French Polynesia (South Pacific) J.-Y. Meyer1 and M. Fourdrigniez2 1Délégation à la Recherche, Government of French Polynesia, B.P. 20981, 98713 Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia. <[email protected]>. 2Groupement Espèces Envahissantes, Bioconsulting, B.P. 50902, 98716 Pirae, Tahiti, French Polynesia. Abstract Islands, often celebrated as natural laboratories for evolution and ecology, also provide unique experimental grounds for societal studies. Although biological invasions are widely recognised as one of the main causes of biodiversity erosion and a driver of global change, the human perception of invasive species may vary at regional and local levels, especially in societies with different levels of socio-economic development and cultures. This study was conducted in French Polynesia (South Pacific), a territory formed by 120 tropical and subtropical oceanic islands (76 being inhabited) divided into five archipelagos (Austral, Marquesas, Society, Tuamotu, and Gambier Is), comprising both highly populated and urbanised islands (such as Tahiti in the Society Is) and less populated and very small islands, sometimes very isolated (without airstrips) and where traditional life style and strong dependence on natural resources still persist. During an eight-month education and prevention campaign targeting alien plant and animal species legally declared invasive in French Polynesia, public meetings were organised on 19 small islands for a total of 2,045 consulted people in 41 different villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 17 Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae Martin Lawrence Grant, F. Raymond Fosberg, and Howard M. Smith SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1974 ABSTRACT Grant, Martin Lawrence, F. Raymond Fosberg, and Howard M. Smith. Partial Flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 17, 85 pages, 1974.-Results of a botanical inves- tigation of the Society Islands carried out by Grant in 1930 and 1931, and subsequent work on the material collected and other collections in the U.S. herbaria and other published works are reported herein. This paper is a partial descriptive flora of the Society group with a history of the botanical exploration and investigation of the area. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Srnithsonian Year. SI PRESS NUMBER 5056. SERIES COVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllurn juponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Grant, Martin Lawrence, 1907-1968. Partial flora of the Society Islands: Ericaceae to Apocynaceae. (Smithsonian contributions to botany, no. 17) Supt. of Docs. no.: SI 1.29:17. 1. Botany-Society Islands. I. Fosberg, Francis Raymond, 1908- , joint author. 11. Smith, Howard Malcolm, 1939- , joint author. 111. Title. IV. Series: Smithsonian Institution. Smith- sonian contributions to botany, no. 17. QK1.2747 no. 17 581’.08s [581.9’96’21] 73-22464 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, US. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price $1.75 (paper cover) The senior author, after spending almost a year during 1930 and 1931 in the Society Islands, collecting herbarium material and ecological data, worked inten- sively on a comprehensive flora of this archipelago for the next five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of the Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter
    Biol Invasions (2008) 10:135–148 DOI 10.1007/s10530-007-9116-y ORIGINAL PAPER Engineering an invasion: classical biological control of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis, by the egg parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi in Tahiti and Moorea, French Polynesia Julie Grandgirard Æ Mark S. Hoddle Æ Jerome N. Petit Æ George K. Roderick Æ Neil Davies Received: 13 October 2006 / Accepted: 19 April 2007 / Published online: 25 May 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homa- surveys during the first year of their interaction in lodisca vitripennis Germar (=H. coagulata Say) French Polynesia (until mid-May 2006). The impact (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), invaded Tahiti in 1999 of G. ashmeadi on H. vitripennis was extremely rapid and spread rapidly to the main island groups of and high. Parasitism of H. vitripennis egg masses by French Polynesia becoming an important pest. It G. ashmeadi has averaged 80–100% in Tahiti since threatened agriculture, native biodiversity, and the introduction of the parasitoid, and populations of created serious social and recreational problems. H. vitripennis nymphs and adults have decreased by Further, massive uncontrolled populations on Tahiti more than 90% since December 2005. Populations presented an elevated invasion threat to other South of H. vitripennis have been successfully maintained Pacific nations. In 2004, a classical biological control at this low level for more than 1 year. The same program against H. vitripennis was initiated in French results were obtained in nearby Moorea where the Polynesia using the highly host-specific egg parasit- parasitoid was probably spread by the unregulated oid Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault (Hymenoptera: transport of plants infested with parasitized H.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing the Impacts of the Little Fire Ant (Wasmannia Auropunctata) in French Polynesia
    Managing the impacts of the little fire ant (Wasmannia auropunctata) in French Polynesia A report prepared by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme for the Government of French Polynesia and Fonds Pacifique 2014 SPREP Library/IRC Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Vanderwoude, Casper … [et al.] Managing the impacts of the little fire antsWasmannia ( auropunctata) in French Polynesia. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 2014. 48 p. 29 cm. ISBN: 978-982-04052-1-9 (print) 978-982-04052-2-6 (e-copy) 1. Ants – Fire ants – French Polynesia. 2. Ants – Fire ants – Control – French Polynesia. I. Haynes, David. II. Richards, Esther. III. Quinquis, Bran. IV. Moverley, David. V. Skelton, Posa.A. VI. Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) VII. Title. All rights for commercial / for profit reproduction or translation, in any form, reserved. SPREP authorises the reproduction or translation of this material for scientific, educational or research purposes, provided that SPREP and the source document are properly acknowledged. Permission to reproduce the document and / or translate in whole, in any form, whether for commercial / for profit or non-profit purposes, must be requested in writing. 595.796 SPREP T: +685 21929 PO Box 240 F: +685 20231 Apia E: [email protected] Samoa W: www.sprep.org SPREP’s Vision: The Pacific environment, sustaining our livelihoods and natural heritage in harmony with our cultures. Managing the impacts of the Little Fire Ant (Wasmannia auropunctata) in French Polynesia Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme Apia, SAMOA June, 2014 Acknowledgements The concept for this project was developed following a visit and a request for assistance from Bran Quinquis, Deputy Mayor of Mahina Commune, French Polynesia, to SPREP in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Polynésie Française
    Bulletin de surveillance sanitaire Direction de la santé Bureau de veille sanitaire Polynésie française Données du 3 au 16 juin 2019 (semaines 23 et 24) SYNTHESE / SUMMARY Pathologies Activité Evolution Dengue Épidémique ↗ Grippe Faible → Leptospirose Élevée ↗ Diarrhée Faible → ACTUALITES LOCALES / LOCAL NEWS Dengue / Dengue fever Epidémie de dengue 2 à Tahiti depuis le 10 avril 2019, alerte à Moorea, Bora-Bora et Nuku-Hiva Au 24/06/2019, 104 cas autochtones et 2 cas importés de dengue 2 ont été confirmés depuis début 2019. - Tahiti est en phase d’épidémie : les communes touchées sont Mahina, Arue, Papeete, Pirae, Faa’a, Punaauia, Paea, Papenoo, Hitiaa, Tiarei, Papeari, Vairao et Taurira. - Trois îles sont en phase d’alerte : Moorea (Papetoai), Bora-Bora (Vaitape et Faanui), Nuku-Hiva (Taiohae). Rappels pour les prescripteurs : 1) Devant un syndrome dengue-like (et uniquement dans ce cas) : - jusqu’à J7, prescrire une PCR dengue en 1ère intention pour confirmer un diagnostic de dengue, identifier le sérotype et déterminer les nouvelles zones géographiques touchées par la dengue 2 - après J7, prescrire une sérologie - demander au patient de se protéger contre les piqûres de moustiques et de limiter ses déplacements. 2) Réaliser une lutte permanente contre les gites larvaires autour des lieux de consultation. Syndrome dengue-like : Fièvre élevée (≥ 38,5° C) d’apparition brutale de moins de 8 jours, ET syndrome algique (céphalées, arthralgies ou myalgies) ET absence de tout point d'appel infectieux (en particulier respiratoire) Cas confirmé
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Economy of French Polynesia 1960 to 1990
    Islands/Australia Working Paper No. 91/4 A survey of the economy of French Polynesia 1960 to 1990 Gilles Blanchet A a S 001 f Pacifi S dIe ISSN 0816-5165 ISBN 0 7315 0937 4 Islands!Australia Working Paper No. 91!4 A survey of the economy of French Polynesia 1960 to 1990 Gilles Blanchet This series is intended to provide prompt preliminary distribution of new work on development studies to interested scholars. It is complementary to the Centre's Monograph series, and intended primarily for shorter pieces and for work that is not yet in its final form. The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the National Centre for Development Studies. © National Centre for Development Studies 1991 This work is copyright. Apart from those uses which may be permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 as amended, no part may he reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be made to the publisher. Gilles Blanchet is an economic and sociological researcher at ORSTROM, now known as the Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération. He has worked for several years in French Polynesia where he was involved in small-seale fishery studies. He was a Visiting Fellow at the National Centre for Development Studies, Austmlian National University, until July 1991. Key to symbols used in tables n.a Not applicable Not available Zero Insignificant Printed in Australia by Soepae Prinlery National Centre for Development Studies Research School ofPacifie Studies The Australian National University GPO Box 4 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Telephone (06) 2494705 EaJl;(06) 2572886 Abstract This paper is a shortened and updated version of a previous report on French Polynesia's economy (Blanchet 1985), and is a descriptive overview rather than a comprehensive survey.
    [Show full text]