DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact Assessment Section F Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Basic Assessment Process Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107-JR, Gauteng FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT October 2016 Prepared for: Pacific Ora (Pty) Ltd Prepared by: CSIR P O Box 320, Stellenbosch, 7599 Tel: +27 21 888 2432 Fax: +27 21 888 2473 Lead Authors: Kelly Stroebel and Minnelise Levendal © CSIR 2016. All rights to the intellectual property and/or contents of this document remain vested in the CSIR. This document is issued for the sole purpose for which it is supplied. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the express written permission of the CSIR. It may also not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover than that in which it is published. Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Title: Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107-JR, Gauteng Purpose of this report: The purpose of this BA Report is to: Present the proposed project and the need for the project; Describe the affected environment at a sufficient level of detail to facilitate informed decision-making; Provide an overview of the BA Process being followed, including public consultation; Assess the predicted positive and negative impacts of the project on the environment; Provide recommendations to avoid or mitigate negative impacts and to enhance the positive benefits of the project; Provide an Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) for the proposed project. This BA Report is the Final Version submitted to GDARD for decision making. Prepared for: Pacific Ora (Pty) Ltd Prepared by: CSIR P O Box 320, Stellenbosch, 7599 Tel: +27 21 888 2432 Fax: +27 21 888 2473 Authors: Kelly Stroebel and Minnelise Levendal Date: October 2016 To be cited as: CSIR, 2016. Draft Basic Assessment Report for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107-JR, Rooiwal, Gauteng. CSIR Report Number. Page 1 Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT SECTION A ACTIVITY INFORMATION SECTION B DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT SECTION C PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SECTION D RESOURCE USE AND PROCESS DETAILS SECTION E IMPACT ASSESSMENT SECTION F APPENDICES APPENDICES Appendix A Site plan(s) Appendix B Photographs Appendix C Facility Illustrations Appendix D Route position information Page 2 Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Appendix E Public Participation information E1: Proof of site notice E2: Written notices issued as required in terms of the regulations E3: Proof of newspaper advertisements E4: Communications to and from interested and affected parties E5: Comments and Responses Report E6: Copy of the register of I&APs Appendix F F1: Waste License(s) application F2: SAHRA information Appendix G Specialist report Appendix H EMPr Appendix I Other information (CV’s of the project team (EAPs who prepared the report)) Page 3 Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Table S1: Listed activities relating to the proposed project 5 Table 1: Listed activities relating to the proposed project 21 Table 2: Gender percentage of the population 38 Table 3: Population by racial group 39 Table 4: Employees by monthly income 39 Figure 1: Site location and layout of the preferred alternative (proposal) 23 Figure 2: Spatial representation of Conservation Important Species and areas of concern. 32 Figure 3: Population density per ward for Region 2 of the CoT 38 Figure 4: Employment status for Region 2 40 Figure 5: Guide to assessing risk/impact significance as a result of consequence and probability. 51 Figure 6: Schematic diagram indicating an example of a cumulative impact 73 Figure 7: Planning region and wards of Region 2 (City of Tshwane Metropolitan Spatial Development Framework, June, 2012). 78 Figure 8: Key priorities as identified by the public for Region 2 of CoT (Tshwane Regional Integrated Development Plan, 2014-15) 79 Figure 9: Regional Developmental Overview for Region 2 (Tshwane Regional Integrated Development Plan, 2014-15) 80 Page 4 Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS In terms of the NEMA EIA Regulations 2014, the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107-JR, Gauteng, requires a Basic Assessment (BA) process, and an application for Environmental Authorisation has been submitted to the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD) as the competent Authority. GDARD Ref No: 002/16-17/I0002 In terms of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) EIA Regulations published in GNR 983, 984 and 985 on the 4 December 2014 Government Gazette Number 38282, and NEM:WA Regulations published in GNR 921 on the 29 November 2013 Government Gazette No 37083, a Basic Assessment (BA) process and a Waste Management License is required as the project applies to the following listed activities (detailed in Table S1 below). Table S1: Listed activities relating to the proposed project Activity No (s) Description of each listed activity as per the Relevant notice: (in terms of the Government Notice: relevant notice) GN. R 983, 4 4 The development and related operation of facilities or December 2014 infrastructure for the concentration of animals for the purpose of commercial production in densities that exceed- (i) 20 square metres per large stock unit and more than 500 units per facility; (ii) 8 square metres per small stock unit and; a. More than 1000 units per facility excluding pigs where (b) applies; b. More than 250 pigs per facility excluding piglets that are not yet weaned. GN. R 983, 4 27 The clearance of an area of 1 hectare or more, but less than 20 December 2014 hectares, of indigenous vegetation, except where such clearance of indigenous vegetation is required for- (i) The undertaking of a linear activity; or (ii) Maintenance purposes undertaken in accordance with a maintenance management plan. GN. R 921, 29 Category A (1) The storage of general waste in lagoons. November 2013 Page 5 Basic Assessment for the proposed Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd Pig and Vegetable Production facility on farm Bultfontein 107 -JR, Gauteng: FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd is proposing a small-scale pig and vegetable production endeavour on 8 hectares of the farm 120 Bultfontein 107-JR, located in the Rooiwal/Onderstepoort area of Pretoria North, Gauteng Province. This area falls under the Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, and is approximately 35 km north of Pretoria. The proposed project will include the following components: Office building and employee facilities; 40 cubic metre slurry dam to store pig waste for use as fertilizer; Approximately 5 hectares of granadilla and spinach crop; Approximately 12 pig houses holding a total of 910 pigs; and Already existing municipal infrastructure (roads and electricity connection). South African pork industry is relatively large in terms of overall South African agricultural sector. It contributes around 2.15% to the primary agricultural sector. The Pacific Ora project will seek to boost local economic development in the area and provide opportunities to decrease poverty and unemployment. Pacific Ora Projects (Pty) Ltd is being provided pro-bono environmental services by the DEA/CSIR’s Special Needs and Skills Development Programme, which aims to assist small- medium micro-enterprises with obtaining Environmental Authorization in order to enhance local economic development. IMPACT ASSESSMENT A total of 53 direct and indirect impacts were identified by respective specialists. These were relating to loss of ecology, air and water quality, social factors etc. EAP’S RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of this BA Process, it is therefore the opinion of the EAPs that conducted this BA Process, i.e. Mrs Minnelise Levendal and Ms Kelly Stroebel, that there are no negative impacts that should be considered as “fatal flaws” from an environmental perspective, and thereby necessitate substantial re-design or termination of the project. Based on the findings of this Draft BA Report, it is the opinion of the EAPs that the project benefits outweigh the negative environmental impacts, and that the project will make a positive contribution towards local economic development and food security in the Rooiwal/Bultfontein area. Due to the fact that the project proponent, i.e. Pacific Ora Projects, is being assisted pro-bono under the DEA Special
Recommended publications
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)

    Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)

    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
  • Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No

    Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No

    ·.:.:-:-:-:-:.::p.=~==~ ::;:;:;:;:::::t}:::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:::;:;:.-:-:.:-:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::-:-:-:-: ..........•............:- ;.:.:.;.;.;.•.;. ::::;:;::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;;:::::. '.' ::: .... , ..:. ::::::::::::::::::::~:~~~~::::r~~~~\~:~ i~ftfj~i!!!J~?!I~~~~I;Ii!!!J!t@tiit):fiftiIit\t~r\t ', : :.;.:.:.:.:.: ::;:;:::::;:::::::::::;:::::::::.::::;:::::::;:::::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:: :.:.:.: :.:. ::~:}:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::tf~:::::::::::::::: ;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:::::::::;:;:::::: ::::::;::;:;:;:;=;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;::::::::;:.: :.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.:-:.;.: :::;:' """"~'"W" ;~!~!"IIIIIII ::::::::::;:::::;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:::::..;:;:;:::;: 1111.iiiiiiiiiiii!fillimiDw"""'8m\r~i~ii~:i:] :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.::::::::::::::{::::::::::::;:: ;.;:;:;:;:t;:;~:~;j~Ij~j~)~( ......................: ;.: :.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.; :.:.;.:.: ':;:::::::::::-:.::::::;:::::;;::::::::::::: EXTRAORDINARY • BUITENGEWONE Provincial Gazette iGazethi YePhondo Kasete ya Profensi Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 15 KIMBERLEY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 DESEMBER No. 1258 PROVINCE OF THE NORTHERN CAPE 2 No. 1258 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 CONTENTS • INHOUD Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE· ALGEMENE KENNISGEWING 105 Northern Cape Nature Conservation Bill, 2009: For public comment . 3 1258 105 Noord-Kaap Natuurbewaringswetontwerp, 2009: Vir openbare kommentaar . 3 1258 PROVINSIE NOORD-KAAP BUITENGEWONE PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 19 DESEMBER 2008 No.1258 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE
  • The Butterflies of Taita Hills

    The Butterflies of Taita Hills

    FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE TO THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi Supported by the National Museums of Kenya and the JRS Biodiversity Foundation ii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Dedication In fond memory of Prof. Thomas R. Odhiambo and Torben B. Larsen Prof. T. R. Odhiambo’s contribution to insect studies in Africa laid a concrete footing for many of today’s and future entomologists. Torben Larsen’s contribution to the study of butterflies in Kenya and their natural history laid a firm foundation for the current and future butterfly researchers, enthusiasts and rearers. National Museums of Kenya’s mission is to collect, preserve, study, document and present Kenya’s past and present cultural and natural heritage. This is for the purposes of enhancing knowledge, appreciation, respect and sustainable utilization of these resources for the benefit of Kenya and the world, for now and posterity. Copyright © 2021 National Museums of Kenya. Citation Kioko, E. N., Musyoki, A. M., Luanga, A. E., Genga, O. C. & Mwinzi, D. K. (2021). Fluttering beauty with benefits: The butterflies of Taita Hills. A field guide. National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. ISBN 9966-955-38-0 iii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS FOREWORD The Taita Hills are particularly diverse but equally endangered.
  • Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹

    Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹

    Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹ Family and scientific name² Common name² N³ L E J Threat Comments ODONATA DAMSELFLIES & DRAGONFLIES Aeshinidae Hawkers Anax imperator Blue emperor √ Gomphidae Clubtails Ictinogomphus ferox Common tigertail √ Libellulidea Perchers / Skimmers Brachythemis impartita Northern banded groundling √ Crocothemis erythraea Broad scarlet √ Orthetrum caffrum Two-striped skimmer √ Pantala flavescens Wandering glider √ MANTODEA MANTIDS Hymenopodidae Flower Mantids Phyllocrania paradoxa. Leaf mantid √ Pseudocreobotra wahlbergi Eyed-flower mantid √ Mantidae Common Mantids Sphodromantis gastrica Common green mantid / Giant mantid √ Tarachodes sp. Bark mantid √ Thespidae Hoplocoryphella sp. √ Empusidae Cone-headed Mantids Hemiempusa capensis Giant cone-headed mantid √ ORTHOPTERA GRASSHOPPERS & CRICKETS Gryllatalpidae Mole Crickets Gryllotalpa africana Mole cricket √ 1 Pyrgomorphidae Foam & Lubber Grasshoppers Phymateus viridipes Green milkweed locust √ Acrididae Short-horned Grasshoppers Acanthacris ruficornis Garden locust √ PHASMATODEA STICK INSECTS Phasmatidae Leptinia graminea Grass stick insect √ HEMIPTERA BUGS Pyrrhocoridae Cotton Stainers Dysdercus nigrofasciatus Cotton stainer √ AUCHENORRHYNCHA Cicadidae Cicadas Platypleura haglundi Orange-wing √ NEUROPTERA LACEWINGS & ANTLIONS Myrmeleontidae Antlions Cymothales spectabilis Tree-hole antlion √ Palpares sp. Dotted antlion √ COLEOPTERA BEETLES Carabidae Ground Beetles Cypholoba tenuicollis √ Tefflus kilimanus √ Staphylinidae Rove Beetles Paederus
  • An Annotated Checklist of Mammals of Kenya

    An Annotated Checklist of Mammals of Kenya

    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH An annotated checklist of mammals of Kenya Simon Musila1,*, Ara Monadjem2,3, Paul W. Webala4, Bruce D. Patterson5, Rainer Hutterer6, Yvonne A. De Jong7, Thomas M. Butynski7, Geoffrey Mwangi8, Zhong-Zheng Chen9,10, Xue-Long Jiang9,10 1 Mammalogy Section, Department of Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi 40658-00100, Kenya 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Swaziland, Kwaluseni, Swaziland 3 Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa 4 Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya 5 Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA 6 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz-Institut für Biodiversität der Tiere, Bonn 53113, Germany 7 Eastern Africa Primate Diversity and Conservation Program, Nanyuki, Kenya 8 School of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Karatina University, Karatina 1957–10101, Kenya 9 Sino-African Joint Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nairobi, Kenya 10 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Yunnan 650223, China ABSTRACT in altitude and distance to the coast and Lake Victoria. The Kenya has a rich mammalian fauna. We reviewed Kenyan coast (0–100 m a.s.l.) is warm and humid, receiving recently published books and papers including the six about 1 000 mm of rainfall per year; the central highlands (1 000–2 500 m a.s.l.) are cool and humid, receiving the volumes of Mammals of Africa to develop an up-to-date highest rainfall (over 2 000 mm per year) in Kenya; the hot and annotated checklist of all mammals recorded from dry regions of northern and eastern Kenya (200 700 m a.s.l.) Kenya.
  • Download Document

    Download Document

    SANBI Biodiversity Series 16 Butterflies of South Africa’s National Botanical Gardens An illustrated checklist compiled by Christopher K. Willis & Steve E. Woodhall Pretoria 2010 SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 Sep- tember 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Manage- ment: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibili- ties relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and flora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appre- ciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, work- shops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Photographs: Steve Woodhall, unless otherwise noted Technical editing: Emsie du Plessis Design & layout: Sandra Turck Cover design: Sandra Turck Cover photographs: Front: Pirate (Christopher Willis) Back, top: African Leaf Commodore (Christopher Willis) Back, centre: Dotted Blue (Steve Woodhall) Back, bottom: Green-veined Charaxes (Christopher Willis) Citing this publication WILLIS, C.K. & WOODHALL, S.E. (Compilers) 2010. Butterflies of South Africa’s National Botanical Gardens. SANBI Biodiversity Series 16. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN 978-1-919976-57-0 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
  • A Handbook on the Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park

    A Handbook on the Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park

    f A HANDBOOK ON THE RARE, THREATENED & ENDEMIC SPECIES OF THE GREATER ST LUCIA WETLAND PARK A product of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species Project Combrink & Kyle June 2006 St Lucia Office: The Dredger Harbour, Private Bag x05, St Lucia 3936 Tel No. +27 35 590 1633, Fax No. +27 35 590 1602, e-mail [email protected] 2 “Suddenly, as rare things will, it vanished” Robert Browning A photograph taken in 2003 of probably the last known Bonatea lamprophylla, a recently (1976) described terrestrial orchid that was known from three small populations, all within the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park. Nothing was known on the biology or life history of this species, except that it produced spectacular flowers between September and October. This orchid might have to be reclassified in the future as extinct. Suggested citation for this product: Combrink, A.S. and Kyle, R. 2006. A Handbook on the Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park. A product of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park - Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species Project. Unpublished internal report. 191 pp. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 FOREWORD............................................................................................................................................ 6 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 7 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................
  • Diversity and Abundance of Butterfly Species and Farmers' Pesticide

    Diversity and Abundance of Butterfly Species and Farmers' Pesticide

    DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE OF BUTTERFLY SPECIES AND FARMERS’ PESTICIDE USE PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS ON INSECT POLLINATORS IN FARMLAND AND NGANGAO FOREST, TAITA HILLS, KENYA MWINZI DUNCAN KIOKO B.Sc. Agriculture (Hons.), University of Nairobi A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN CROP PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CROP PROTECTION FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI NOVEMBER 2019 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Mwinzi Duncan Kioko …………………………………. Date …………………………. A56/82718/2015 Approval This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as University supervisors. Prof. John H. Nderitu ……………………………………Date…………………. Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection University of Nairobi Prof. John W. Kimenju ……………………………………….Date……………… Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection University of Nairobi Dr. Esther N. Kioko ……………………………………………Date………………. Zoology Department National Museums of Kenya i DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my parents, Mr. Jackson Mbondo and Mrs. Florence Mwinzi, my wife Beth Mbithe and my daughter Hope Mumo, for their love and support, which ensured successful completion of my studies. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank God for the grace and favour He has shown me throughout my studies and project. I acknowledge the National Museums of Kenya (NMK) and JRS Biodiversity Foundation for the financial support for my project, The University of Nairobi for granting me a scholarship. I acknowledge and commend the constant support provided by supervisors, Prof. John Nderitu, Prof. John Kimenju and Dr. Esther Kioko. Without their invaluable advice, encouragement, contributions and guidance, the objectives of this study would not have been achieved.
  • A Revised Systematic Checklist of the Extant Mammals in the SA

    A Revised Systematic Checklist of the Extant Mammals in the SA

    DURBAN MUS. NOVIT. 28 SYSTEMATIC CHECKLIST OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN MAMMALS 56 A revised systematic checklist of the extant mammals of the southern African subregion BRONNER, G.N.12, HOFFMANN, M. , TAYLOR, P.J.34, CHIMIMBA, C.T. , BEST, P.B.45, MATTHEE, C.A. & ROBINSON, T.J.5 1Small Mammal Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, P/Bag Rondebosch 7701, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] 2Centre for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M St NW, Suite 600, Washington DC 20036, USA 3Durban Natural Science Museum, P.O. Box 4085, Durban 4000, South Africa 4Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa 5Department of Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa Article available at: www.durban.gov.za/naturalscience/ Summary Bronner, G.N., Hoffmann, M., Taylor, P.J., Chimimba, C.T., Best, P.B., Matthee, C.A. & Robinson, T.J. 2003. A revised systematic checklist of the extant mammals of the southern African subregion. Durban Museum Novitates 28: 56-106. The current paper presents a revised, annotated, systematic checklist of 351 extant mammal species, in 190 genera, currently known to occur in southern Africa (south of the Zambezi and Cunene Rivers) and its coastal waters. The checklist includes each species' scientific and English common name, details concerning original description, occurrence or possible occurrence in each of the seven countries falling within the Subregion, and, where relevant, the IUCN global Category of Threat. Taxonomic notes, together with the relevant literature, are provided to justify the proposed classification adopted at each hierarchical level.
  • Biodiversity

    Biodiversity

    Appendix K: Biodiversity DETAILS OF SPECIALIST AND DECLARATION OF INTEREST (For official use only) File Reference Number: 12/12/20/ NEAS Reference Number: DEAT/EIA/ Date Received: Application for authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 PROJECT TITLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONTINUOUS ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY FOR THE MATIMBAPOWER STATION IN LEPHALALE, LIMPOPO PROVINCE Specialist: Bathusi Environmental Consulting cc Contact person: Riaan A. J. Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) Postal address: PO Box 77448, Eldoglen Postal code: 0171 Cell: 082 3765 933 Telephone: 012 658 5579 Fax: 086 636 5455 E-mail: [email protected] Professional SACNASP (Botanical & Ecological Scientist - 400005/03) affiliation(s) (if any) Project Consultant: Royal HaskoningDHV Contact person: Prashika Reddy Postal address: PO Box 25302, Monument Park, Gauteng, South Africa Postal code: 0105 Cell: 083 2848687 Telephone: 012 367 5973 Fax: 012 367 5878 E-mail: [email protected] 4.2 The specialist appointed in terms of the Regulations_ I, Riaan A. J. Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) declare that: General declaration: • I act as the independent specialist in this application; • I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I

  • Taxonomic Key to Small Mammals

    Key to small mammals commonly found in agricultural areas in eastern and southern Africa • This key has been written to identify small mammals, and especially problem rodents, found in agricultural areas in Eastern and Southern Africa. Because it uses only characteristics which can be measured in the field it does not follow standard mammal (phylogenetic) taxonomy. • Juvenile animals may not key out correctly. Juvenile animals can sometimes be recognised by their large feet, smoother fur, and occasionally by their only partially grown-in teeth. • Not all mammals occurring in any area will be in the key. If a mammal is not in the key please send it to the nearest natural science museum for accurate identification. • Starting on page 3, read each choice and make a decision which most closely resembles the animal you are identifying. The picture may not be identical to your mammal but choose whichever best suits. Ecorat Key to problem rodents in agricultural lands Page 3 Key to small mammal orders 1. Shrews have long mobile noses, sharp insect-eating teeth and small eyes. Page 4 2. Elephant shrews have long mobile noses, larger eyes with white ring around them, and long legs. Page 5 3. Moles all live underground, have small or no ears, small or no eyes, and small or no tails. Page 6 4. Rodents are all colours and sizes but all have gnawing teeth with a space behind them. Page 7 Ecorat Key to problem rodents in agricultural lands Page 4 Shrews Shrews can be identified by their long mobile noses, sharp insectivorous teeth, small eyes, and aggressive behaviour.

  • Sites and Species of Conservation Interest for the CESVI Project Area

    SPECIES and SITES of CONSERVATION INTEREST for the CESVI PROJECT AREA, SOUTHERN ZIMBABWE edited by Rob Cunliffe October 2000 Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 7 SPECIES AND SITES OF CONSERVATION INTEREST FOR THE CESVI PROJECT AREA, SOUTHERN ZIMBABWE R. N. Cunliffe October 2000 Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 7 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Species and Sites for Conservation in the Southern Lowveld i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 2. APPROACH ...........................................................1 3. SPECIES LISTS ........................................................2 3.1 Patterns of Diversity ...............................................2 4. SPECIES OF INTEREST .................................................3 5. SITES OF INTEREST....................................................3 6. FURTHER WORK REQUIRED............................................4 7. DISCUSSION ..........................................................4 7.1 Sites of Conservation Interest ........................................4 7.2 The Need for a Broader Overview.....................................5 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................5 9. REFERENCES .........................................................5 10. TABLES ..............................................................7 Table 1. Numbers of species of various taxa listed..............................7 Table 2. Numbers of species of