DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix K: Biodiversity DETAILS OF SPECIALIST AND DECLARATION OF INTEREST (For official use only) File Reference Number: 12/12/20/ NEAS Reference Number: DEAT/EIA/ Date Received: Application for authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 PROJECT TITLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONTINUOUS ASH DISPOSAL FACILITY FOR THE MATIMBAPOWER STATION IN LEPHALALE, LIMPOPO PROVINCE Specialist: Bathusi Environmental Consulting cc Contact person: Riaan A. J. Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) Postal address: PO Box 77448, Eldoglen Postal code: 0171 Cell: 082 3765 933 Telephone: 012 658 5579 Fax: 086 636 5455 E-mail: [email protected] Professional SACNASP (Botanical & Ecological Scientist - 400005/03) affiliation(s) (if any) Project Consultant: Royal HaskoningDHV Contact person: Prashika Reddy Postal address: PO Box 25302, Monument Park, Gauteng, South Africa Postal code: 0105 Cell: 083 2848687 Telephone: 012 367 5973 Fax: 012 367 5878 E-mail: [email protected] 4.2 The specialist appointed in terms of the Regulations_ I, Riaan A. J. Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) declare that: General declaration: • I act as the independent specialist in this application; • I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the Act, regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; • I will comply with the Act, regulations and all other applicable legislation; • I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; • I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing: o any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and o the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; • all the particulars furnished by me in this form are true and correct; and • I realise that a false declaration is an offence in terms of Regulation 71 and is punishable in terms of section 24F of the Act. Signature of the specialist: Bathusi Environmental Consulting cc Name of company (if applicable): 2014 04 07 Date: BEC Report Reference: RHD – MCA – 2014/08 Version: 2014.07.18.5 Authority Reference NA Biodiversity Impact Assessment of the Proposed Continuous Ash Disposal Facility & Linear Infrastructure Route for Matimba Power Station, Limpopo Province© compiled by Bathusi Environmental Consulting July 2014 - 082 3765 933 - [email protected] - 012 658 5579 - 086 636 5455 Biodiversity EIA Assessment Matimba Power Station Continuous Ash Disposal Programme© ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I PROJECT DETAILS Client: Royal HaskoningDHV, on behalf of Eskom Holdings SOC Limited Biodiversity Impact Assessment of the Proposed Continuous Ash Disposal Report name: Facility & Linear Infrastructure Route for Matimba Power Station, Limpopo Province Report type: Strategic Biodiversity Impact Assessment Report BEC Project number: RHD – MCS – 2014/08 Report Version: 2014.07.18.5 Compiled by: Riaan A. J. Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) - Bathusi Environmental Consulting II SPECIALIST INVESTIGATORS The Natural Scientific Professions Act of 2003 aims to ‘provide for the establishment of the South African Council of Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP), and for the registration of professional, candidate and certified natural scientists; and to provide for matters connected therewith’. Quoting the Natural Scientific Professions Act of 2003: ‘Only a registered person may practice in a consulting capacity’ (20(1) – pg 14). The following specialists contributed to this report: Botanical Investigator: Riaan Robbeson (Pr.Sci.Nat.) Qualification: M.Sc. (Botany), UP Affiliation: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Fields of Expertise: Botanical Scientist & Ecological Scientist Registration Number: 400005/03 Affiliation: Grassland Society of Southern Africa Membership Status: Professional Member Membership Number: 667.08/08 Faunal Investigator: Dewald Kamffer (Pr.Sci.Nat.) Qualification: M.Sc. (Conservation Biology), UP Affiliation: South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions Fields of expertise: Ecological Scientist & Zoological Scientist Registration number: 400204/05 III RESERVED COPYRIGHT This report, or any part thereof, may not be amended, rearranged or changed in any manner or form, without prior consent from the authors. This report may not be copied, reproduced or used in any manner, other than for the purpose of this particular environmental application, without specific written permission from Bathusi Environmental Consulting cc (BEC). This also refers to electronic copies of this report, which are supplied for the purpose of inclusion as part of other reports, including main reports. Similarly, any recommendations, statements or conclusions drawn from or based on this report must refer to this report. Should extractions from this report be included in a main report, this report must be included in its entirety as an appendix or separate section to the main report. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Report: RHD - MCA - 2014/08 Version 2014.07.18.5 July 2014 i Biodiversity EIA Assessment Matimba Power Station Continuous Ash Disposal Programme© ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IV CONTENTS I Project Details .......................................................................................................................................... i II Specialist Investigators ............................................................................................................................ i III Reserved Copyright ................................................................................................................................. i IV Contents .................................................................................................................................................. ii V List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... iv VI List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... v VII List of Graphs .......................................................................................................................................... v 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Biophysical Assessment ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Botanical Assessment ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Faunal Assessment .................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Ecological Impact Assessment ................................................................................................... 7 1.4.1 Proposed Ashing Facility ........................................................................................................ 7 1.4.2 Proposed Conveyor Line ........................................................................................................ 9 2 Terms of Reference .............................................................................................................................. 10 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 11 4 Project Synopsis ................................................................................................................................... 12 5 Biophysical Attributes of the Site Alternatives & Immediate region ...................................................... 14 5.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 14 5.2 Land Cover & Land Use of the Region ..................................................................................... 14 5.2.1 Annotations on Habitat Fragmentation ................................................................................. 15 5.2.2 Annotations
Recommended publications
  • Determination of Nutritional Composition of Encosternum Delegorguei Caught in Nerumedzo Community of Bikita, Zimbabwe

    Determination of Nutritional Composition of Encosternum Delegorguei Caught in Nerumedzo Community of Bikita, Zimbabwe

    International Journal of Biology; Vol. 7, No. 4; 2015 ISSN 1916-9671 E-ISSN 1916-968X Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Determination of Nutritional Composition of Encosternum delegorguei Caught in Nerumedzo Community of Bikita, Zimbabwe Tendai A. Makore1, Penina Garamumhango1, Tinofirei Chirikure1 & Sherpherd D. Chikambi2 1 Department of BTECH Food Science and Technology, Masvingo Polytechnic, Masvingo, Zimbabwe 2 Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe Correspondence: Tendai A. Makore, Department of BTECH Food Science and Technology, Masvingo Polytechnic, P.O.Box 800, Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Tel: 263-252-305. E-mail: [email protected] Received: July 20, 2015 Accepted: August 10, 2015 Online Published: August 14, 2015 doi:10.5539/ijb.v7n4p13 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijb.v7n4p13 Abstract Three forms of Encosternum delegorguei consumed in Nerumedzo community, Bikita, Zimbabwe were analysed for their nutritional composition. Protein, fat, ash and mineral content were determined for the preprocessed, well prepared and spoiled bugs. The proximate composition and minerals of the insects were determined using standard methods. One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used in analyzing data. They were found to contain 30-36% protein; 51-53% fat and 1-1.5% ash respectively. Spoiled bugs contained the lowest protein content of 30.76±0.98% and highest amount of magnesium of 120±2.2 mg/100g while the preprocessed and well processed contained 110±2.5 mg/100g and 112±2.4 mg/100g respectively. Phosphorous was the most abundant in all forms with a value of 570-575 mg/100g. Calcium levels for all the three forms showed an overall mean of 85-89 mg/100g.
  • Consumption of Insects As Food in Three Villages Of

    Consumption of Insects As Food in Three Villages Of

    e- ISSN: 2394 -5532 p- ISSN: 2394 -823X Scientific Journal Impact Factor: 3.762 International Journal of Applied And Pure Science and Agriculture www.ijapsa.com CONSUMPTIO N OF INSECTS AS FOOD IN THREE VILLAGES OF NORTH WEST DISTRICT ,BOTSWANA John Cassius Moreki 1 and Sethunya Obatre 2 1Department of Animal Science and Production, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources , Private Ba g 0027, Gaborone, Botswana. 2Department of Agricultural Economics, Education and ExtensExtensionion , BotswanaUniversity of Agriculture and Natural Resources , Private Bag 0027, Gaborone, Botswana . Abstract This study investigated the consumption of ed ible insects in Nxaraga, Sehithwa and Shorobe villages of the North West district of Botswana. Information was gathered using a structured questionnaire which was administered to 60 respondents across the three villages and also through direct observation. A total of six insect species were identified belonging to six families and four orders (i.e., Coleoptera, Isoptera, Lepidoptera and Orthoptera) with t he two most consumed orders being Lepidoptera and Coleoptera. Carebara vidua F. Smith (33.3%) was the most consumed followed by Sternocera orissa Buq. (21.7%), Agrius convolvuli L. (15.0%), Oryctes boas Fabr.(13.3%), Imbrasia belina Westwood (10.0%) and Lo custa migratoria (6.7%). The study revealed that insects were abundant during and/or immediately after the rainy season. This implies that insects can be harvested and preserved during the time of abundan ce to maximize their utilization in meeting the human protein needs. The common methods of collecting insects were hand picking, trapping and digging. Insects were prepared for consumption by boiling, frying or roasting.
  • Chapter 13 SOUTHERN AFRICA

    Chapter 13 SOUTHERN AFRICA

    Chapter 13 Zimbabwe Chapter 13 SOUTHERN AFRICA: ZIMBABWE Taxonomic Inventory Taxa and life stages consumed Coleoptera Buprestidae (metallic woodborers) Sternocera funebris (author?), adult Sternocera orissa Buquet, adult Scarabaeidae (scarab beetles) Lepidiota (= Eulepida) anatine (author?), adult Lepidiota (= Eulepida) masnona (author?), adult Lepidiota (= Eulepida)nitidicollis (author?), adult Miscellaneous Coleoptera Scientific name(s) unreported Hemiptera Pentatomidae (stink bugs) Euchosternum (= Haplosterna; = Encosternum) delegorguei (Spinola) (= delagorguei), adult Pentascelis remipes (author?), adult Pentascelis wahlbergi (author?), adult Miscellaneous Hemiptera Scientific name(s) unreported Homoptera Cicadidae (cicadas) Loba leopardina (author?) Hymenoptera Apidae (honey bees) Trigona spp., larvae Formicidae (ants) Carebara vidua Sm., winged adult Isoptera Termitidae Macrotermes falciger Gerstacker (= goliath), winged adult, soldier, queen Macrotermes natalensis Haviland Lepidoptera Lasiocampidae (eggar moths, lappets) Lasiocampid sp., larva Limacodidae (slug caterpillars) Limacodid sp. Notodontidae (prominents) Anaphe panda (Boisdv.), larva Saturniidae (giant silkworm moths) Bunaea (= Bunea) alcinoe (Stoll), larva Bunaea sp., larva Cirina forda (Westwood), larva 1 of 12 9/20/2012 2:02 PM Chapter 13 Zimbabwe Gonimbrasia belina Westwood, larva Goodia kuntzei Dewitz (?), larva Gynanisa sp. (?), larva Imbrasia epimethea Drury, larva Imbrasia ertli Rebel, larva Lobobunaea sp., larva Microgone sp., (?), larva Pseudobunaea sp. (?),
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Seismic Reflection Survey and Well Drilling, Umkhanyakude District Municipality, Northern Kzn

    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Seismic Reflection Survey and Well Drilling, Umkhanyakude District Municipality, Northern Kzn

    SFG1897 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY AND WELL DRILLING, UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN KZN Public Disclosure Authorized Client: SANEDI–SACCCS Consultant: G.A. Botha (PhD, Pr.Sci.Nat) in association with specialist consultants; Brousse-James and Associates, WetRest, Jeffares & Green, S. Allan Council for Geoscience, P.O. Box 900, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Council for Geoscience report: 2016-0009 June, 2016 Copyright © Council for Geoscience, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project description ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Location and regional context ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 2D seismic reflection survey and well drilling; project description and technical aspects ............ 7 2.2.1 Seismic survey (vibroseis) process ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Well drilling ...........................................................................................................................
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)

    Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)

    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
  • Catalogue of the Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera in the Hill Museum

    Catalogue of the Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera in the Hill Museum

    Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries CATALOGUE OF THE Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera IN THE HILL MUSEUM BY A. G. GABRIEL, F.E.S. Issued June, 1932 LONDON JOHN BALE, SONS & DANIELSSON, LTD. 83-91, GBEAT TITCHFIELD STEEET, OXEOED STEEET, W. 1 1932 Price 20/- Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Unfortunately Mr. Joicey did not live to see the publication of this Catalogue. It will however remain, together with the four completed volumes of the " Bulletin of the Hill Museum," as a lasting memorial to to the magnificent collection of Lepidoptera amassed by Mr. Joicey, and to the work carried out at the Hill Museum under his auspices. G. Talbot. Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries CATALOGUE OF THE TYPE SPECIMENS OF LEPIDOPTERA RHOPALOCERA IN THE HILL MUSEUM. By A. G. GABRIEL, F.E.S. INTRODUCTION BY G. TALBOT. It is important to know exactly where type specimens are to be found. The British Museum set an example by publishing catalogues of some of their Rhopalocera types, and we hope this will be continued. Mr. Gabriel, who was responsible for that work, has been asked by Mr. Joicey to prepare a catalogue for the Hill Museum. The original description of almost every name in this catalogue has been examined for the correct reference, and where the sex or habitat was wrongly quoted, the necessary correction has been made.
  • Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No

    Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No

    ·.:.:-:-:-:-:.::p.=~==~ ::;:;:;:;:::::t}:::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:::;:;:.-:-:.:-:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::-:-:-:-: ..........•............:- ;.:.:.;.;.;.•.;. ::::;:;::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;;:::::. '.' ::: .... , ..:. ::::::::::::::::::::~:~~~~::::r~~~~\~:~ i~ftfj~i!!!J~?!I~~~~I;Ii!!!J!t@tiit):fiftiIit\t~r\t ', : :.;.:.:.:.:.: ::;:;:::::;:::::::::::;:::::::::.::::;:::::::;:::::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:: :.:.:.: :.:. ::~:}:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::tf~:::::::::::::::: ;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:::::::::;:;:::::: ::::::;::;:;:;:;=;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;::::::::;:.: :.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.:-:.;.: :::;:' """"~'"W" ;~!~!"IIIIIII ::::::::::;:::::;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:::::..;:;:;:::;: 1111.iiiiiiiiiiii!fillimiDw"""'8m\r~i~ii~:i:] :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.::::::::::::::{::::::::::::;:: ;.;:;:;:;:t;:;~:~;j~Ij~j~)~( ......................: ;.: :.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.; :.:.;.:.: ':;:::::::::::-:.::::::;:::::;;::::::::::::: EXTRAORDINARY • BUITENGEWONE Provincial Gazette iGazethi YePhondo Kasete ya Profensi Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 15 KIMBERLEY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 DESEMBER No. 1258 PROVINCE OF THE NORTHERN CAPE 2 No. 1258 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 CONTENTS • INHOUD Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE· ALGEMENE KENNISGEWING 105 Northern Cape Nature Conservation Bill, 2009: For public comment . 3 1258 105 Noord-Kaap Natuurbewaringswetontwerp, 2009: Vir openbare kommentaar . 3 1258 PROVINSIE NOORD-KAAP BUITENGEWONE PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 19 DESEMBER 2008 No.1258 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE
  • Ole Opt Era: Buprestidae)

    Ole Opt Era: Buprestidae)

    J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 1979 Vol. p, No. I, pp. 89-114 Revision of the genera of the tribe Julodini ole opt era: Buprestidae) E. HOLM Department of Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria The validity of the six genera in the tribe is confirmed and one new subgenus, Protojulodis, is described. Generic characters are reviewed, and the relevant external morphology is illustrated. Distribution maps of the genera and a phylogram and key are provided. The zoogeography of the tribe is described and interpreted and a possible phylogeny is suggested. INTRODUCTION The problem of the relative age of the tribe Julodini and its genera is a traditional one for buprestologists, as the tribe has some primitive but also some highly specialized features as compared with other tribes in the family. The generic units are ill-defined and often include remnant species with hardly any variation near to highly variable species that are obviously in a state of flux. Probably on account of the contrast in biology between this tribe and the rest of the family, adult synapomorphic characters of the tribe are distinct, though they changed little along its lineages. In the Julodini neither dults nor larvae occur in wood: all known larvae are free-living root-feeders, while adults are apparently short-lived leaf- and flower-feeders. In this paper I have assembled existing information on the morphology and distribution of the tribe and tried to find more characters that help to clarify the phylogeny (sensu Mayr) and aid in interpreting the distribution of the group. Of the characters previously overlooked, the most useful proved to be the ovipositor, hind wing venation and metacoxal sculpture.
  • Im Auftrage Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Säugetierkunde Ev

    Im Auftrage Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Säugetierkunde Ev

    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 6 Maria Jose Löpez-Fuster, J. Gosdlbez und V. Sans-Coma Gomez, L; Sans-Coma, V. (1975): Edad relativa de Crocidura russula en egagröpilas de Tyto alba en el nordeste iberico. Mise. Zool. 63, 209-212. Gosälbez, J.; Löpez-Fuster, M. J.; Durfort, M. (1979): Ein neues Färbungsverfahren für Hodenzellen von Kleinsäugetieren. Säugetierkdl. Mitt. 27, 303-305. Hellwing, S. (1971): Maintenance and reproduetion in the white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula monacha Thomas, in captivity. Z. Säugetierkunde 36, 103-113. — (1973): The postnatal development of the white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula monacha in captivity. Z. Säugetierkunde 38, 257-270. — (1975): Sexual reeeptivity and oestrus in the white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula monacha. J. Reprod. Fert. 45, 469-477. Kahmann, H.; Kahmann, E. (1954): La musaraigne de Corse. Mammalia 18, 129-158. Niethammer, J. (1970): Uber Kleinsäuger aus Portugal. Bonn. zool. Beitr. 21, 89-118. Röben, P. (1969): Die Spitzmäuse (Soricidae) der Heidelberg Umgebung. Säugetierkdl. Mitt. 17, 42-62. Saint-Girons, M. C. (1973): Les Mammiferes de France et du Benelux (faune marine exceptee) Paris: Doin. Sans-Coma, V.; Gomez, I.; Gosälbez, J. (1976): Eine Untersuchung an der Hausspitzmaus {Crocidura russula Hermann, 1780) auf der Insel Meda Grossa (Katalonien, Spanien). Säugetierkdl. Mitt. 24, 279-288. Vesmanis, I.; Vesmanis, A. (1979): Ein Vorschlag zur einheitlichen Altersabstufung bei Wimperspitz- mäusen (Mammalia: Insectivora: Crocidura). Bonn. zool. Beitr. 30, 7-13. Vogel, P. (1972): Beitrag zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie der Gattungen Sorex, Neomys und Crocidura (Soricidae). Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel 82, 165-192. Anschriften der Verfasser: Dra. Maria Jose Löpez-Fuster und Prof.
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola

    Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola

    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
  • Project Name

    Project Name

    SYRAH RESOURCES GRAPHITE PROJECT, CABO DELGADO, MOZAMBIQUE TERRESTRIAL FAUNAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Prepared for: Syrah Resources Limited Coastal and Environmental Services Mozambique, Limitada 356 Collins Street Rua da Frente de Libertação de Melbourne Moçambique, Nº 324 3000 Maputo- Moçambique Australia Tel: (+258) 21 243500 • Fax: (+258) 21 243550 Website: www.cesnet.co.za December 2013 Syrah Final Faunal Impact Assessment – December 2013 AUTHOR Bill Branch, Terrestrial Vertebrate Faunal Consultant Bill Branch obtained B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees at Southampton University, UK. He was employed for 31 years as the herpetologist at the Port Elizabeth Museum, and now retired holds the honorary post of Curator Emeritus. He has published over 260 scientific articles, as well as numerous popular articles and books. The latter include the Red Data Book for endangered South African reptiles and amphibians (1988), and co-editing its most recent upgrade – the Atlas and Red Data Book of the Reptiles of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland (2013). He has also published guides to the reptiles of both Southern and Eastern Africa. He has chaired the IUCN SSC African Reptile Group. He has served as an Honorary Research Professor at the University of Witwatersrand (Johannesburg), and has recently been appointed as a Research Associate at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth. His research concentrates on the taxonomy, biogeography and conservation of African reptiles, and he has described over 30 new species and many other higher taxa. He has extensive field work experience, having worked in over 16 African countries, including Gabon, Ivory Coast, DRC, Zambia, Mozambique, Malawi, Madagascar, Namibia, Angola and Tanzania.
  • Patterns of Species Richness, Endemism and Environmental Gradients of African Reptiles

    Patterns of Species Richness, Endemism and Environmental Gradients of African Reptiles

    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2016) ORIGINAL Patterns of species richness, endemism ARTICLE and environmental gradients of African reptiles Amir Lewin1*, Anat Feldman1, Aaron M. Bauer2, Jonathan Belmaker1, Donald G. Broadley3†, Laurent Chirio4, Yuval Itescu1, Matthew LeBreton5, Erez Maza1, Danny Meirte6, Zoltan T. Nagy7, Maria Novosolov1, Uri Roll8, 1 9 1 1 Oliver Tallowin , Jean-Francßois Trape , Enav Vidan and Shai Meiri 1Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, ABSTRACT 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Department of Aim To map and assess the richness patterns of reptiles (and included groups: Biology, Villanova University, Villanova PA 3 amphisbaenians, crocodiles, lizards, snakes and turtles) in Africa, quantify the 19085, USA, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, PO Box 240, Bulawayo, overlap in species richness of reptiles (and included groups) with the other ter- Zimbabwe, 4Museum National d’Histoire restrial vertebrate classes, investigate the environmental correlates underlying Naturelle, Department Systematique et these patterns, and evaluate the role of range size on richness patterns. Evolution (Reptiles), ISYEB (Institut Location Africa. Systematique, Evolution, Biodiversite, UMR 7205 CNRS/EPHE/MNHN), Paris, France, Methods We assembled a data set of distributions of all African reptile spe- 5Mosaic, (Environment, Health, Data, cies. We tested the spatial congruence of reptile richness with that of amphib- Technology), BP 35322 Yaounde, Cameroon, ians, birds and mammals. We further tested the relative importance of 6Department of African Biology, Royal temperature, precipitation, elevation range and net primary productivity for Museum for Central Africa, 3080 Tervuren, species richness over two spatial scales (ecoregions and 1° grids). We arranged Belgium, 7Royal Belgian Institute of Natural reptile and vertebrate groups into range-size quartiles in order to evaluate the Sciences, OD Taxonomy and Phylogeny, role of range size in producing richness patterns.