DOCSLIB.ORG

JABONN KIM Korea Institute of Finance 11 Gil 19 KFB Bldg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JABONN KIM Korea Institute of Finance 11 Gil 19 KFB Bldg JABONN KIM Korea Institute of Finance 11 Gil 19 KFB bldg. Myeong-Dong Jung-Gu Seoul Korea 04538 (Office call) +822-3705-6277; (cell) +8210-6330-5245 [email protected] https://kif.re.kr UCLA School of Law 385 Charles E. Young Dr. East, Los Angeles, CA 90095 [email protected] https://law.ucla.edu/ Positions: Korea Institute of Finance (KIF) Senior Research Fellow Research division: Consumer Finance and Protection Division (Previous: capital market division, financial policy division, financial industry division, financial market division, macro and international economy division) Research Area: Law, Banking, Econometrics; Financial Education Korea University School of Law Lecturer, Financial Law, 2015-16 Fellow, Financial Law Center, Korea University, 2016-current OECD INFE Research Committee, 2015-current Stanford University Visiting Scholar, Economics Department, 2010-2011 Seoul National University Lecturer, Economics Department, 2005 Korea University Lecturer, Economics Department, Graduate School, 2004 Education: Law UCLA School of Law, LLM. 2017-2018 Korea University School of Law, Master of Law, 2015 Economics State University of New York at Albany, Ph.D. in Economics, 1999-2004 Seoul National University, M.A. in Economics, 1997 Seoul National University, B.A. in Economics, 1994 Philosophy Seoul National University, B.A. in Philosophy, 1987 Awards: 2016 KIF President’s Award 2013 FSC Chairman’s Award (Financial Services Commission, a government ministry organization for financial policy and regulation) 2004 Travel grant for Far Eastern Meeting of the Econometric Society, Seoul, July 1 2003 Outstanding Conference Paper Award, 56th New York State Economics Association Annual Meeting, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, October Professional Activities: 2017 Juror as a representative, Criminal Court 1 2015-current Member, “Shadow” Financial Services Commission (FSC), MK News group 2013-current Advisory member, National Financial Education Council, FSC 2013-2015 Director, KIF Financial Education Center 2014-current Member, OECD INFE (international network on financial education) Research Committee (as a representative for Korea. Globally 13 members from 12 countries). 2014-current Board member of Korean Financial Law Association 2013-2014 Member, FSC Self-Evaluation Committee (Chair of Balancing Act Subcommittee) 2011-current Advisory member, Financial Intelligence Unit of FSC 2010 Member, Macro-Prudential Risk Analysis Committee, Financial Supervisory Services (FSS) 2010 Advisory member, Knowledge Sharing Program (KSP), Ministry of Finance and Planning (MOFP) 2010 Member, Task force for Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFI), FSC 2009 Consultant, Payment and Settlement System Supervision, FSS 2009 Consultant, SMEs Financing, Korean Credit Guarantee Corporation (KODIT, government sponsored enterprises) 2009 Member, Selection Committee of Korea Investment Corporation (KIC) Board members 2008-2009 Director and board member, Korean Money and Finance Association 2008-2010 Director, Financial Policy Research Group, KIF 2008 Member, Selection Committee of KIC Board members 2007-2008 Chief, the Blue House Task Force for gov’t policy evaluation: Review of Economic and Financial Policy 2007 Member, Selection committee for block sale manager (securities firms) for Korean Deposit Insurance Corporation 2007-current Board member, Korea Banking and Financial Law Association 2007-2008 Member, Asset Management Forum, Korea Asset Management Association 2007 Member, SME Financing Research Group, Presidential Commission on Small and Medium Enterprises (PCSME) 2007-2008 Board member and co-editor, Korea Payment and Settlement Association 2007-2007 Member, Preparation Unit for Rental Housing Construction, Mistry of Construction (MOC) & Ministry of Finance and Planning (MOFP) 2007-2008 Member, Government Policy Evaluation Committee, Office of Prime Minister (OPM) 2007 Member, Task Force for Commercial Paper Mechanism Reform, MOFP 2007 Columnist for financial policy, Government Information Agency, the Office of the President 2007 Member, Task Force for Collective Investment, Trust and Advisory Wrap Services, FSC 2006-2007 Columnist for KTB Investment Corporation (Private Equity Fund) 2006-2011 Director, Payment and settlement research group, KIF 2004-2006 Member, Task force for Electronic Banking Act, MOFP 2005 Member, Task Force for SME Financing and Policy, MOFP Granted Research for law and governmental policy: 2016 FSC, “Review of global trends of Anti-Money Laundering Act and Real Name Financial Transaction Act, and policy suggestions” 2016 FSC, “Research on national strategy of financial education” 2015 FSC FIU, “Analysis of FATF 4th round mutual evaluation results” 2015 FSC, “Study on the needs-based financial education and survey” 2014 FSC Capital Market Investigation Unit (FSC CMIU), “Policy research on capital market unfair and abusive trading: focusing the U.S. and U.K. cases and implications for Korea Capital Market Act” 2014 FSC FIU, “Research on strategy for FATF 4th round mutual evaluation preparation” 2012 FSC and KDIC (Korean Deposit Insurance Corp.), “Analysis of financial education performance and policy directions: focusing on consumer protection against fraudulent scams and incidents such as Voice phishing 2 and incomplete sales” 2012 MOFP, “Research on Social Cooperatives Banking and Cooperatives Act for small loan and mutual help” 2012 FSC FIU, “Study on FATF new recommendation and strategy” 2012 Seoul Guarantee Insurance Corporation (SGIC-government sponsored enterprise), “Optimal dividend and ownership structure” 2009 KODIT, “Study on the credit insurance policy: effects and policy suggestions” 2009 FSS, “Research on payment and settlement supervisory structure and methodology” 2008 MOFP, “Strategy for development of SMEs credit guarantee system” 2007-2008, Korea Development Bank (KDB), “Strategy for development of policy financing” 2007 PCSME, “Development strategy for SMEs financing under crisis-driven economic environments” 2007 MOFP, “Policy study to enhance the function of Commercial Paper for SMEs support” 2006 MOFP, “Policy study for promoting the lower income household and family financing” 2006 MOFP, “Policy study for the soundness in the management of lower income household and family financing” 2006 MOFP, “Evaluation of the governmental SME financing policy: July 2004 to June 2005” 2006 MOFP, “Study on the effect of asset management development in the East Asia on the investment in-and- out flow and foreign exchange market of Korea” 2005 World Bank, “Asset Management Industry in East Asian Countries” National Assembly (conference presentation, committee testimony, sub-meeting presentation): 2013 Bipartisan 20th anniversary conference on Real Name Financial Transaction Act: “Suggestion of new regulatory framework on beneficial owner account” 2013 Banking Committee sub-meeting, “Anti-Money Laundering Act. Cooperation between FIU and National Tax Service” 2009 Banking Committee sub-meeting, “Insurance Act. Incidental business of insurance company” 2007 Banking Committee, Expert testimony, “Effect of mixing bank and securities companies in their core businesses on the soundness of financial system” 2006 National Assembly digital economy group, “Capital Market Act and involvement of securities firms in payment system” 2005 Banking Committee sub-meeting for SME finance, “SME financing problem and relationship banking” 2005 Banking Committee, Expert testimony, “Electronic Banking Act: consumer protection and liability rule” Conference Participation/Trip to International Supervisory Authorities: 2016 Presenter, “Brexit and Conflict of Legal Strategy: Common Law v. Civil Law,” Financial Law Center and Legal Research Institute, Korea University (Scheduled: October 28 and November 18, respectively) 2016 Presenter & Session Moderator, Asian Law and Economics Association (Seoul National University law school); Korea Law and Economics Association (Seoul National University economics dep.), “Over- Shooting or Right-Shooting? Assessment of Regulatory Aftermath of Global Financial Crisis in terms of Proportionality Principle” 2016 Presenter, Korea Finance and Money Association, “Forward-looking asset-liability management and debt structure of banks.” (Co-author: Y.S. Park and T. Cho) and “Principle-based regulation and incentive compatible penalty scheme.” 2016 Discussant, Korean Financial Law Association annual meeting, “Separation of banking and commerce in Korea” 2015 Session Chair, Korea Finance and Money Association (session 2: Legal Issues on Internet Only Bank) 2015 Presenter, Korea Banking and Financial Law Association, “Fintech, an innovator of delegated banking and regulation?” (Co-author: Hyoung-Goo Kang) 2015 Presenter, Korea Financial Information Association, “Forward-looking asset-liability management and debt structure of banks.” (Co-author: Y.S. Park and T. Cho) 2015 Presenter, Panel on Korean Economy, “Incentive structure and regulatory mechanism for beneficial owner 3 of bank accounts: screening requirement vs. signaling requirement” 2015 Visiting: CFTC, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, Barclays, Financial Industry Regulation Authority (FINRA), Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center at George Washington University (Director: Annamaria Lusardi, OECD INFE Research Committee chairperson) 2014 Presenter, Korea Financial Law Association annual meeting, “Corporate governance of financial holding companies” 2014 Presenter, Korea-U.S. Finance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Korea Health System Review
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 11 No. 7 2009 Republic of Korea Health system review Chang Bae Chun • Soon Yang Kim Jun Young Lee • Sang Yi Lee Health Systems in Transition Chang Bae Chun, National Health Insurance Corporation Soon Yang Kim, Yeungnam University Jun Young Lee, University of Seoul Sang Yi Lee, Jeju National University Republic of Korea: Health System Review 2009 The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Offi ce for Europe, the Governments of Belgium, Finland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the European Investment Bank, the World Bank, the London School of Economics and Political Science, and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Keywords: DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE EVALUATION STUDIES FINANCING, HEALTH HEALTH CARE REFORM HEALTH SYSTEM PLANS – organization and administration REPUBLIC OF KOREA © World Health Organization 2009 on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies All rights reserved. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Please address requests about the publication to: Publications WHO Regional Offi ce for Europe Scherfi gsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Offi ce web site (http://www.euro.who.int/PubRequest) The views expressed by authors or editors do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policies of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies or any of its partners.
    [Show full text]
  • International Directory of Deposit Insurers
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation International Directory of Deposit Insurers September 2015 A listing of addresses of deposit insurers, central banks and other entities involved in deposit insurance functions. Division of Insurance and Research Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Washington, DC 20429 The FDIC wants to acknowledge the cooperation of all the countries listed, without which the directory’s compilation would not have been possible. Please direct any comments or corrections to: Donna Vogel Division of Insurance and Research, FDIC by phone +1 703 254 0937 or by e-mail [email protected] FDIC INTERNATIONAL DIRECTORY OF DEPOSIT INSURERS ■ SEPTEMBER 2015 2 Table of Contents AFGHANISTAN ......................................................................................................................................6 ALBANIA ...............................................................................................................................................6 ALGERIA ................................................................................................................................................6 ARGENTINA ..........................................................................................................................................6 ARMENIA ..............................................................................................................................................7 AUSTRALIA ............................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • List of Certain Foreign Institutions Classified As Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY JANUARY 2001 Revised Aug. 2002, May 2004, May 2005, May/July 2006, June 2007 List of Certain Foreign Institutions classified as Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms The attached list of foreign institutions, which conform to the definition of foreign official institutions on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms, supersedes all previous lists. The definition of foreign official institutions is: "FOREIGN OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS (FOI) include the following: 1. Treasuries, including ministries of finance, or corresponding departments of national governments; central banks, including all departments thereof; stabilization funds, including official exchange control offices or other government exchange authorities; and diplomatic and consular establishments and other departments and agencies of national governments. 2. International and regional organizations. 3. Banks, corporations, or other agencies (including development banks and other institutions that are majority-owned by central governments) that are fiscal agents of national governments and perform activities similar to those of a treasury, central bank, stabilization fund, or exchange control authority." Although the attached list includes the major foreign official institutions which have come to the attention of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Department of the Treasury, it does not purport to be exhaustive. Whenever a question arises whether or not an institution should, in accordance with the instructions on the TIC forms, be classified as official, the Federal Reserve Bank with which you file reports should be consulted. It should be noted that the list does not in every case include all alternative names applying to the same institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Cross-Border Payments: Building Blocks of a Global Roadmap
    Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Enhancing cross-border payments: building blocks of a global roadmap Stage 2 report to the G20 July 2020 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2020. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 978-92-9259-398-8 (print) ISBN 978-92-9259-399-5 (online) Main text The G20 has made enhancing cross-border payments a priority during the 2020 Saudi Arabian Presidency. Faster, cheaper, more transparent and more inclusive cross-border payment services would deliver widespread benefits for citizens and economies worldwide, supporting economic growth, international trade, global development and financial inclusion. While the economic ramifications of the Covid-19 pandemic are undoubtedly also affecting the payments landscape in the short term, it is important to maintain momentum to identify and take forward structural improvements in cross-border payment arrangements for the post-pandemic global economy. This report, and the detailed technical background report it accompanies (CPMI (2020)), represent the output of Stage 2 of the three-stage process to develop a global roadmap for enhancing cross-border payments (Figure 1). This process has identified and developed 19 “building blocks” to enhance cross-border payments. As part of the work, a set of considerations have been identified that support the work in Stage 3 to develop a roadmap to pave the way forward to enhance cross-border
    [Show full text]
  • Reserves Management and FX Intervention
    Reserves management and FX intervention Bank of Korea Abstract Korea’s FX reserves have increased steadily since 2008, to a total of $404 billion as of the end of 2018. This has helped reduce private foreign currency funding costs and exchange rate volatility by contributing to a stable sovereign credit rating. In turn, this has helped to stabilise domestic financial and economic conditions. Korea’s FX authorities have consistently adhered to the principle that the exchange rate should be determined by market forces that reflect economic fundamentals and FX supply and demand. Measures to stabilise the market are carried out only in exceptional circumstances, when there are excessive fluctuations in the exchange rate over a short period of time. FX market intervention is believed to effectively reduce market volatility by calming market sentiment through the use of intervention tools customised to specific circumstances such as temporary herd behaviour. Details of interventions are not disclosed, as they might affect market participants’ expectations. However, the authorities have recently decided to release the net dollar-won trading volumes, in order to increase transparency of FX policies in line with global standards. The Bank of Korea (BOK) decides on the composition of the FX reserves based on its investment objectives, the neutral currency composition and market forecasts. The BOK also has worked to improve its risk management techniques for each type of risk factor and it has expanded its use of external managers to enhance the efficiency of its reserve management. Keywords: Korea’s FX reserves, FX reserves accumulation, FX market intervention, disclosures, FX reserves portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD International Network on Financial Education
    OECD International Network on Financial Education Membership lists as at May 2020 Full members ........................................................................................................................ 1 Regular members ................................................................................................................. 3 Associate (full) member ....................................................................................................... 6 Associate (regular) members ............................................................................................... 6 Affiliate members ................................................................................................................. 6 More information about the OECD/INFE is available online at: www.oecd.org/finance/financial-education.htm │ 1 Full members Angola Capital Market Commission Armenia Office of the Financial System Mediator Central Bank Australia Australian Securities and Investments Commission Austria Central Bank of Austria (OeNB) Bangladesh Microcredit Regulatory Authority, Ministry of Finance Belgium Financial Services and Markets Authority Brazil Central Bank of Brazil Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) Brunei Darussalam Autoriti Monetari Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Ministry of Finance Canada Financial Consumer Agency of Canada Chile Comisión para el Mercado Financiero China (People’s Republic of) China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission Czech Republic Ministry of Finance Estonia Ministry of Finance Finland Bank
    [Show full text]
  • The G20: Characters in Search of an Author 2012/04
    THE G20: CHARACTERS IN SEARCH OF AN AUTHOR 2012/04 IGNAZIO ANGELONI* AND JEAN PISANI-FERRY** Highlights • The G20 has produced mixed results. After initial high hopes and some success, negotiations within the G20 forum have slowed, progress is less visible and disagreement rather than agreement has come to the fore. Against this background, this paper revisits the basic economic and geopolitical motivations for the G20, in order to review its performance and attempt to draw lessons for the path ahead. • We conclude that: (1) in today’s global economy (with its trade and financial market integration and its institutional architecture) a “G20-type” institution is necessary– if it didn’t exist, it should be created; (2) the G20 had its high noon moment in 2008-09 and some recalibration of expectations was inevitable, but its achievements in 2010-11 have nevertheless been disappointing; (3) to be fair there is, in detailed and technical work, more progress than there seems to be at first sight; (4) from a governance standpoint, the G20 is not an efficient forum; improvements in working methods are urgently needed; (5) more fundamentally, for the G20 to retain its role, its members need to develop a BRUEGEL WORKING PAPER PAPER WORKING BRUEGEL common vision of global economic problems and the way to approach them. * Bruegel and European Central Bank; [email protected]. ** Director of Bruegel; [email protected]. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Bank of Korea Annual Conference held in Seoul, 26-27 May 2011. We are grateful to our discussants, Yiping Huang and Sungmin Kim, and to Barry Eichengreen, Avinash Persaud, Andre Sapir, Tom Sargent, Larry Schembri, to name just a few, for stimulating comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking Globalization, Monetary Transmission, and the Lending
    The International Banking Research Network: Approaches and Initiatives Claudia M. Buch (Deutsche Bundesbank) Linda Goldberg (Federal Reserve Bank of New York) Joint IBRN-IMF Workshop | Washington DC | October 15, 2019 National Bank of Poland Oesterreichische Nationalbank Deutsche Bundesbank Sveriges Riksbank Norges Bank Central Bank of Russia Bank of Danmarks Nationalbank Canada Bank of England Central Bank of Ireland De Nederlandsche Bank Banque de France US Federal Reserve Banco de España Bank of Japan Banco de Portugal Bank of Korea Reserve Hong Kong Swiss National Bank Bank of Banco de Monetary Authority India México Banka Slovenije Banca D’Italia Central Bank of Central Bank of the Bank of Greece Colombia Republic of Turkey Banco Central do Brasil Bank of Israel Reserve Bank of Australia Central Bank of Chile International Organizations Bank for Organisation for Economic Financial International International European Central Bank European Systemic Risk Board Cooperation and Stability Board Monetary Fund Settlements Development 2 How does the IBRN operate? 3 Collectively determine policy- relevant issue Analyze (confidential) bank- level datasets Use common methodology, complement with cross- country perspective Share code, results, and perform meta analysis 4 What are the key research questions and outputs? 5 International transmission Adjustment of bank of monetary policy lending to liquidity risk through bank lending Interaction between Cross-border lending monetary and prudential effects of policies for bank lending macroprudential
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy of the Bank of Korea During the First 60 Years 1
    Monetary Policy of the Bank of Korea during the First 60 Years 1 Kyungsoo Kim and Jaewoo Lee * The current paper provides an analytic overview of the history of monetary policy in Korea, since the founding of the Bank of Korea in June 1950 through the spring of 2010. In light of the dramatic socio- economic transformation over this period, the 60 years are divided into four phases, which provided a different environment for the con- duct of monetary policy. An organizing analytical framework is pro- posed for each phase, with the hope of facilitating further research. Keywords: Inflation, Liberalization, Small open economy JEL Classification: E4, E5, F4 I. Introduction The Bank of Korea (hereinafter denoted as “BOK” or “the Bank”) was established as the central bank of the young Republic of Korea in June 1950. In the same month, the Korean War broke out, which devastated the country socially and economically for the next three years. After much * Professor, Department of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, 53 Myeongnyun-dong 3-ga, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-745, Korea, (Tel) +82-2-760-0431, (Fax) +82-2-760-0946, (E-mail) [email protected]; Corresponding Author, Deputy Division Chief of the Open Macroeconomics Division, the IMF Research Depart- ment, 700 19th St N.W., Washington DC 20431, USA, (Tel) +1-202-623-7331, (Fax) +1-202-589-7331, (E-mail) [email protected], respectively. We appreciate the comments by participants in the Bank of Korea 2010 Conference, the se- minar in the Korea University, and the 18th Seoul Journal of Economics Inter- national Symposium in Seoul National University, and in particular, by Andrew Filardo, Stan Fischer, Dongsoo Kang, Jun Il Kim, Soyoung Kim, Kwanho Shin, and Woon Shin.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy Challenges in Korea Under Global Uncertainty
    Preliminary Working Draft Please do not quote or cite without author’s permission Monetary Policy Challenges in Korea under Global Uncertainty Kyuil Chung 1. Introduction The global economic environment has been going through a series of unprecedented events: a US-China trade dispute with no end in sight (Figure 1), the simultaneous rise of geopolitical risks in many places in the world, and resulting policy uncertainties in major economies. All of these pose serious challenges to central banks. Korea, too, cannot avoid the impacts of these global phenomena. In fact, it is one of the countries that is most affected because of its fully open goods and financial markets. Figure 1 US and China Trade Policy Uncertainty Note: Trade policy uncertainty is standardized with Z-score. Source: http://www.policyuncertainty.com. Korea’s policy framework to address domestic and/or external shocks was largely overhauled immediately after the Asian Financial Crisis (AFC). Before the AFC, Korea had adopted a managed floating regime and monetary targeting. After experiencing severe capital flow reversals during the crisis period, Korea transformed its policy framework to a free floating system and inflation targeting, under which the central bank conducts monetary policy with a focus only on domestic issues and lets the exchange rate absorb external shocks. Meanwhile, after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) the legal mandate of the Bank of Korea (BOK) was extended to include financial stability in addition to the 1 / 12 existing price stability objective. The BOK now operates monetary policy with the aim of having inflation converge to the target in the medium term, while paying attention to financial stability at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Accounts Guide Last Updated – January 2018
    Classification of Accounts Guide Last updated – January 2018 Contents Part I: General introduction Part II: Residence Part III: Sector categories Part IV.1 – IV.2: Industrial classification Part IV.3: Relationship between sector and industrial classifications Part V.1: Sector components (ESA 10) and sub components Part V.2: List of countries 1 Part I Classification of Accounts Guide – General Introduction I.1 Foreword This guide is intended for all institutions completing a range of Bank of England statistical returns. It describes the two most important systems of classification used in compiling economic and financial statistics in the United Kingdom – the economic sector classification, and the industrial classification. This guide is intended to serve both as an introduction for newcomers and as a source of reference. The nomenclature in the sector classification is in line with international standards – in particular, the European System of National and Regional Accounts (abbreviated to ‘ESA10’). In addition, the analysis of industrial activity is in line with the 2007 standard industrial classification of economic activities (SIC) introduced by the Office for National Statistics. Those without knowledge of accounts classification are recommended to refer to the ‘Guide to Classification’ (Part I Section 3) which takes the reader through the main questions to be answered to help classify accounts correctly. The system of classification used in this guide is solely for statistical purposes. Parts II to IV of the guide describe the main aspects of the classification system in more detail, including lists of examples of institutions, or a web link reference, for many categories. I.2 An introduction to the classification of accounts Sector and industrial classification To understand the underlying behaviour which is reflected in movements in economic and financial statistics, it is necessary to group those entities engaged in financial transactions into broad sectors with similar characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Tmark Hotel Myeongdong MAP BOOK
    Tmark Hotel Myeongdong MAP BOOK 2016.12.01_ver1.0 Tourtips Tmark Hotel Myeongdong Update 2016.12.01 Version 1.0 Contents Publisher Park Sung Jae Chief Editor Nam Eun Jeong PART 01 Map Book Editor Nam Eun Jeong, Yoo Mi Sun, Kim So Yeon Whole Map 5 Myeong-dong 7 Insa-dong 9 Marketing Lee Myeong Un, Park Hyeon Yong, Kim Hye Ran Samcheong-dong&Bukchon 11 Gwanghwamun&Seochon 13 Design in-charge Kim No Soo Design Editor Bang Eun Mi PART 02 Travel Information Map Design Lee Chae Ri Tmark Hotel Myeongdong 15 SM Duty Free 16 Publishing Company Tourtips Inc. 7th floor, S&S Building, 48 Ujeongguk-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul Myeong-dong·Namdaemun·Namsan Mountain 17 Insa-dong·Jongno 24 02 - 6325 - 5201 / [email protected] Samcheong-dong·Bukchon 29 Gwanghwamun·Seochon 33 Website www.tourtips.com Recommended Tour Routes 37 Must-buy items in Korea 38 The 8 Best Items to Buy at SM Duty Free 39 The copyright of this work belongs to Tourtips Inc. This cannot be re-edited, duplicated, or changed without the written consent of the company. For commercial use, please contact the aforementioned contact details. Even for non-commercial use, the company’s consent is needed for large-scale duplication and re-distribution. Map Samcheong-dong&Bukchon 04 Legend 2016.12.01 Update Seoul 01 Whole Map Line 1 1 Line 2 2 Line 3 3 Line 4 4 Line 5 Bukchon Hanok Village 5 Gyeongui•Jungang Line G Airport Railroad Line A Tongin Market Changdeokgung Palace Gyeongbokgung Palace Seochon Anguk Gyeongbokgung 3 안국역 3 경복궁역 Gwanghwamun Insa-dong Jongmyo Shrine Center Mark Hotel 5 Gwanghwamun
    [Show full text]