DOCSLIB.ORG

Belarus: a System That Allows Human Rights Violations at Any Given Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belarus: a System That Allows Human Rights Violations at Any Given Time Belarus: A system that allows human rights violations at any given time Following the latest crackdown on peaceful protests, the European Union must increase international monitoring and ensure strong human rights conditionality in its relations with Belarus This April 2017 briefing note on Belarus was prepared by Human Rights House Foundation with the support of the Barys Zvozskau Belarusian Human Rights House. Quick facts about Belarus The human rights situation in Belarus has been outside the spotlight of the international community since August 2015, when President Lukashenko pardoned the six remaining political prisoners. The EU praised this move by suspending sanctions levied against 170 persons and three entities in Belarus. The EU decided not to renew most sanctions in February 2016, despite Belarus not heeding the EU’s calls for the civil and political rights of former political prisoners to be restored. In the meantime, relations between the EU and • Founding member of the UN and party to all of its Belarus have sensibly improved in a number of fields, main human rights treaties notably because of the role of Belarus in hosting • Only European State not a member of the Council of negotiations to solve the crisis in Ukraine. Over the Europe and not party to the European human rights past year and a half, the overall scale of repressions system declined although no systemic changes have occurred • Only European State still using the death penalty within to improve the human rights situation. its ordinary criminal law • State governed by presidential decrees, which can overwrite any constitutional or legislative principle A year later – in April 2017 – Belarus is back under • Although all political prisoners were released, including the spotlight as the authorities brutally crack down on human rights defender Ales Bialiatski, they were not peaceful protesters, observers, journalists and human rehabilitated rights defenders. A wave of peaceful demonstrations • Legislation criminalising activities on behalf of has triggered the authorities’ repression and shown unregistered organisations, including activities directed that nothing has changed in Belarus. The so-called at promoting human rights, remains in place. This renders NGO activists at the mercy of the arbitrariness progress on human rights has not happened. The of the authorities, including arrest at any given time international community must acknowledge this, • President Alexander Lukashenko has governed the renew its attention on Belarus, and engage strongly in country for almost a generation, having been first supporting civil society. elected on 23 June 1994 • The 1994 presidential election is considered the Now more than ever, it is essential that the EU fully country’s only free and fair national election. Every engages to achieve concrete improvements in the election since has been marred by irregularities, human rights violations, and repressions in the lead-up and human rights situation in the country and further aftermath supports the mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur • The 11 October 2015 presidential election and the 11 on Belarus. Setting benchmarks is the only way to September 2016 parliamentary election were not ensure reforms that protect fundamental freedoms. marked by violence, unlike previous ones. However, Without such benchmarks, the EU will continue to be the elections were not conducted in accordance with played by the so-called liberalisation or, in other international standards. • About 1000 people have been subjected to various words, President Lukashenko’s window-dressing. forms of repression in connection with the so-called law on “social parasites”. More than 200 of them were arrested, including human rights defenders and journalists. 1 A new crackdown on peaceful protests The events of February/March 2017 show the true face of repression in Belarus On 25–26 March, the Belarusian authorities arrested and in some cases violently attacked peaceful protestors, in Minsk and across the country. More than 700 people were arrested, and around 100 people were held overnight, many of whom then faced administrative charges in the courts. This came after the arrest of 300 people in connection with protests from 3–24 March. Since February, numerous demonstrations have taken place protesting against the application of Presidential Decree #3 (On Prevention of Social Parasitism) and the overall economic policy pursued in Belarus. The authorities responded with repressions against independent journalists, human rights defenders, representatives of the political opposition, civil society activists, bloggers and ordinary people. About 1,000 people were subjected to various forms of repression; more than 200 of them were arrested, including human rights defenders and journalists. In an effort to combat what the President has referred to as “social parasitism,” the law targets and imposes a tax of around EUR 235 on Belarusians who have worked less than half of the year and who have not registered at the country’s labour offices. The situation remained tense despite the announcement of the President that the application of the law would be suspended for one year in order for it to be “corrected.” The President promised a tough reaction against “organisers of dissent” and instructed his interior minister to ensure “perfect order” is established in the country.1 UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Belarus, Miklós Haraszti, described the decree as “an arbitrary and cruel measure,” which is estimated to affect more than 470,000 Belarusians: “These people are not only singled out and stamped as ‘society’s parasites,’ but they are subjected to substantial fines amounting to the equivalent of EUR 235, or about two thirds of the average monthly wage in Belarus.”2 The so-called law on “social parasite” will be addressed by the Special Rapporteur in his report to the Human Rights Council in June 2017. The peak of the crackdown against protestors coincided with the celebrations of Freedom Day, an unofficial holiday that commemorates the creation of the Belarusian People’s Republic (BPR) on 25 March 1918.3 Arrests of protestors were preceded by preventative detentions to stop reporting and monitoring. Police raided the offices of human rights organisation Viasna, detaining 57 people. These included local and international observers and representatives of foreign media and human rights organisations. While all 57 people were released later that day, one of the detainees, Aliaksei Loika, was taken to hospital after he was beaten by riot police during the raid.4 On March 21-22, the country’s security services detained numerous citizens in the framework of a criminal case on charges of preparing for mass riots (Part 3 of Art. 293 of the Criminal Code). All the detainees were taken into custody and placed in a KGB pre-trial prison and a detention centre. On March 23, a KGB spokesperson said that 26 people had been detained in the case, while more detentions were possible in the near future. These actions of representatives of law enforcement agencies were accompanied by gross violations of the detainees’ rights, in particular the unjustified use of physical force. Of particular concern are reports of lawyers being prohibited from visiting the detainees, violating the Constitutional right to defence. The large-scale repression was accompanied by a propaganda campaign in state-controlled media, aimed at whipping up hysteria and an atmosphere of fear in the society.5 1 Belarus detains dozens amid “social parasite” protests, available at http://humanrightshouse.org/Articles/22309.html. 2 Press release of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, 14 March 2017, available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=21375&LangID=E 3 Belarus: Prominent human rights defender detained as protests continue, available at http://humanrightshouse.org/Articles/22347.html. 4 True face of Belarus: Systematic repression, available at http://humanrightshouse.org/Articles/22363.html. 5 Stop whipping up hysteria and atmosphere of fear in the Belarusian society, available at 2 More than 30 individuals were detained on suspicion of committing a crime under Art. 293, part 3, of the Criminal Code (training or other education of persons for further participation in mass riots, as well as financing or other material support of such activities). At the moment, 18 of them have been accused of such an offense. Human rights defenders view the case as politically motivated. Within Belarus’ system of repression, a crackdown could be expected Highly restrictive legislation remains in place in Belarus, allowing the authorities to, at any given time, arrest dissenting voices, human rights defenders, journalists, activists, or anybody else. The arbitrariness of the system has not been modified, and the authorities were ready to crack down on the population knowing that nothing and nobody could stop them. In his latest statement, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus noted that “[the events of 25-26 March] prove the pre-meditated character of the repressive measures, and show an open return by the Government to its old policy of mass repression against citizens who exercise or dispense defence for human rights provided by the constitution and international treaties.”6 The statement was endorsed by the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, Maina Kiai, the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prospects for Democracy in Belarus
    An Eastern Slavic Brotherhood: The Determinative Factors Affecting Democratic Development in Ukraine and Belarus Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi, B.A. Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2009 Thesis Committee: Trevor Brown, Advisor Goldie Shabad Copyright by Nicholas Hendon Starvaggi 2009 Abstract Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, fifteen successor states emerged as independent nations that began transitions toward democratic governance and a market economy. These efforts have met with various levels of success. Three of these countries have since experienced “color revolutions,” which have been characterized by initial public demonstrations against the old order and a subsequent revision of the rules of the political game. In 2004-2005, these “color revolutions” were greeted by many international observers with optimism for these countries‟ progress toward democracy. In hindsight, however, the term itself needs to be assessed for its accuracy, as the political developments that followed seemed to regress away from democratic goals. In one of these countries, Ukraine, the Orange Revolution has brought about renewed hope in democracy, yet important obstacles remain. Belarus, Ukraine‟s northern neighbor, shares many structural similarities yet has not experienced a “color revolution.” Anti- governmental demonstrations in Minsk in 2006 were met with brutal force that spoiled the opposition‟s hopes of reenacting a similar political outcome to that which Ukraine‟s Orange Coalition was able to achieve in 2004. Through a comparative analysis of these two countries, it is found that the significant factors that prevented a “color revolution” in Belarus are a cohesive national identity that aligns with an authoritarian value system, a lack of engagement with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Belarus – a Relationship with Reservations Dr
    BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION EDITED BY DR. HANS-GEORG WIECK AND STEPHAN MALERIUS VILNIUS 2011 UDK 327(476+4) Be-131 BELARUS AND THE EU: FROM ISOLATION TOWARDS COOPERATION Authors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Dr. Vitali Silitski, Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann, Andrei Yahorau, Dr. Svetlana Matskevich, Valeri Fadeev, Dr. Andrei Kazakevich, Dr. Mikhail Pastukhou, Leonid Kalitenya, Alexander Chubrik Editors: Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck, Stephan Malerius This is a joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung. This publication has received funding from the European Parliament. Sole responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication rests with the authors. The Centre for European Studies, the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung and the European Parliament assume no responsibility either for the information contained in the publication or its subsequent use. ISBN 978-609-95320-1-1 © 2011, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin / Berlin © Front cover photo: Jan Brykczynski CONTENTS 5 | Consultancy PROJECT: BELARUS AND THE EU Dr. Hans-Georg Wieck 13 | BELARUS IN AN INTERnational CONTEXT Dr. Vitali Silitski 22 | THE EU and BELARUS – A Relationship WITH RESERvations Dr. Kai-Olaf Lang, Dr. Martin Koopmann 34 | CIVIL SOCIETY: AN analysis OF THE situation AND diRECTIONS FOR REFORM Andrei Yahorau 53 | Education IN BELARUS: REFORM AND COOPERation WITH THE EU Dr. Svetlana Matskevich 70 | State bodies, CONSTITUTIONAL REALITY AND FORMS OF RULE Valeri Fadeev 79 | JudiciaRY AND law
    [Show full text]
  • Protests in Belarus (1994-2011) .Pdf
    Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources UPI "Belarus against Marks Russification of National Front of Independence 27 7 1994 Minsk 6500 0 Belarus Belarus Day" "the state's decision to discontinue eight [opposition] UPI "Belarussians 4 1 1995 Minsk 300 0 newspapers" protest press ban" " lower taxes, increase wages, create new jobs and enlarge AP "Thousands spending for health Rally In Minsk care, education Against Low Pay, 26 1 1995 Minsk 40000 0 and science." Unions Price Hikes" "introduction of teaching in the BBC World "Police Belarussian confiscate grenade language at higher at Belarussian educational Assembly of language 15 2 1995 unk 100 1 establishments," Belarussian Gentry demonstration" PAP News Wire Financing of "BELARUSSIAN construction of ASSOCIATION OF POLES DEMAND Polish language POLES IN POLISH SCHOOL 1 3 1995 Minsk 10 0 school BELARUS IN GRODNO" BBC World " Police arrest student activists Procession of for burning state 24 5 1995 Minsk 70 30 Uknown Political Convicts flag" ITAR-TASS "Minsk workers march on Police arrest presidential student activists residence in payment of back for burning state protest at wage 17 7 1995 Minsk . 0 wages flag arrears" AFP "Security forces arrest Minsk Minsk Metro metro strike 21 8 1995 Minsk 150 1 Metro strike Workers leaders" Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources Interfax "Belarusian Popular Front Reconsideration of protests against oil oil agreement with
    [Show full text]
  • POLL: HUMAN RIGHTS RANKED LOW in BELARUS More Belarusians Value the Right to Life and to Free Education Over Rights Such As Freedom of Speech and Free Elections
    POLL: HUMAN RIGHTS RANKED LOW IN BELARUS More Belarusians value the right to life and to free education over rights such as freedom of speech and free elections This memo presents key results of a public opinion poll on Belarusians’ perception of human rights, commissioned by Belarus Helsinki Committee (BHC) and implemented by SATIO. Pact provided technical expertise to BHC in drafting this memo because it believes that the Belarusian human rights sector would benefit from an evidence-based approach to addressing the priority needs of its constituency, while simultaneously creating demand for a wider range of human rights issues. “Recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world.”1 This is the very first sentence of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is ratified by all UN member countries, including Belarus. Respect for human rights depends on the willingness of the state to ensure respect for human rights on one hand, and willingness of the people to defend their rights on the other hand. However, in the countries believed to be “not free” according to international measures, for instance, Belarus,2 one cannot rely on political will to ensure human rights protection. In such countries, the readiness of people to stand up for their rights, and the knowledge of tools to protect human rights are critically important. From April to June, 2013, the BHC commissioned a nation-wide representative survey3 on human rights and human rights organizations in Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • Review–Chronicle
    REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 Human Rights Center Viasna ReviewChronicle » of the Human Rights Violations in Belarus in 2005 VIASNA « Human Rights Center Minsk 2006 1 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 » VIASNA « Human Rights Center 2 Human Rights Center Viasna, 2006 REVIEWCHRONICLE of the human rights violations in Belarus in 2005 INTRODUCTION: main trends and generalizations The year of 2005 was marked by a considerable aggravation of the general situation in the field of human rights in Belarus. It was not only political rights » that were violated but social, economic and cultural rights as well. These viola- tions are constant and conditioned by the authoritys voluntary policy, with Lu- kashenka at its head. At the same time, human rights violations are not merely VIASNA a side-effect of the authoritarian state control; they are deliberately used as a « means of eradicating political opponents and creating an atmosphere of intimi- dation in the society. The negative dynamics is characterized by the growth of the number of victims of human rights violations and discrimination. Under these circums- tances, with a high level of latent violations and concealed facts, with great obstacles to human rights activity and overall fear in the society, the growth points to drastic stiffening of the regimes methods. Apart from the growing number of registered violations, one should men- Human Rights Center tion the increase of their new forms, caused in most cases by the development of the state oppressive machine, the expansion of legal restrictions and ad- ministrative control over social life and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Int Cat Css Blr 30785 E
    The Cost of Speaking Out Overview of human rights abuses committed by Belarusian authorities during peaceful protests in February-March 2017 © Truth Hounds Truth Hounds E [email protected] /facebook.com/truthhounds/ W truth-hounds.org IPHR - International Partnership for Human Rights Square de l'Aviation 7A 1070 Brussels, Belgium E [email protected] @IPHR W IPHRonline.org /facebook.com/iphronline CSP - Civic Solidarity Platform W civicsolidarity.org @CivicSolidarity /facebook.com/SivicSolidarity Crimea SOS E [email protected] /facebook.com/KRYM.SOS/ W krymsos.com Table of contents 1. Introduction and methodology 4 2. Chronological overview of events 5 2.1. February protests against the law on taxing the unemployed 5 2.2. March wave of administrative arrests of civil society activists and journalists 6 2.3. Increasing use of force by law enforcement officials 7 2.4. Criminal and administrative arrests prior to the 25 March Freedom Day protest in Minsk 9 2.5 Ill-treatment, excessive use of force and arbitrary detentions by police on 25 March - Freedom Day in Minsk 10 2.6 Raid of NGO HRC Viasna office and detention of 57 human rights defenders 14 2.7. Further arrests and reprisals by the authorities 14 2.8. Criminal cases related to allegations of attempted armed violence 16 3. Police use of force and arbitrary detentions during assemblies 17 3.1. International standards 17 3.2. Domestic legislation 18 3.2. Structure of the law enforcement services 19 3.4. Patterns of human rights abuses 19 4. Overview of concerns related to violations of freedom of assembly 20 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election
    BELARUS Restrictions on the Political and Civil Rights of Citizens Following the 2010 Presidential Election of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6: Everyone has the right to recognition spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimi- without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, nation to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective rem- basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person edy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. by law. Article 9: No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security June 2011 564a Uladz Hrydzin © This report has been produced with the support of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012
    Human Rights Center «Viasna» Situation of Human Rights in Belarus in 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Мinsk, 2013 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS IN 2012 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Compiled by Tatsiana Reviaka Editing and introduction by Valiantsin Stefanovich The book was prepared on the basis of the monthly reviews of the situation of human rights in Belarus in 2012. Each of the monthly reviews includes the analysis of the most important events which influenced the observation of human rights for the given period, as well as the most evident and characteristic features of the abuses registered at that time. The review was prepared on the basis of personal applications of victims of human rights violations, the facts that were registered by human rigths defenders or voiced in open information sources. The book makes use of photos by Yuliya Darashkevich Dzmitry Bushko, Siarhei Hudzilin, Nastassia Loika, the web-sites http://photo.bymedia. net, http://nn.by, http://euroradio.fm, http://www.svaboda.org, http://volkovysk.by, http://gazetaby.com, http://mfront.net, http://www.reuters.com, http://belsat.eu/be, belhouse.org and the archive of the Human Rights Center «Viasna». TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 9 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in January 2012 19 Politically motivated criminal prosecution 19 Harassment and pressurization of human rights activists and organizations 21 Torture and cruel treatment, poor conditions of detention 23 Death penalty 25 Administrative prosecution of social and political activists 25 Restrictions on freedom of speech 27 Restrictions on freedom of assembly 28 Situation of freedom of association 30 Review-Chronicle of Human Rights Violations in Belarus in February 2012 31 Political prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to 'Nation' Practice
    National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to 'Nation' Practice Tatsiana Kulakevich SAIS Review of International Affairs, Volume 40, Number 2, Summer-Fall 2020, pp. 97-110 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/783885 [ Access provided at 7 Mar 2021 23:30 GMT from University Of South Florida Libraries ] National Awakening in Belarus: Elite Ideology to ‘Nation’ Practice Tatsiana Kulakevich This article examines the formation of nationalism in Belarus through two dimensions: elite ideology and everyday practice. I argue the presidential election of 2020 turned into a fundamental institutional crisis when a homogeneous set of ‘nation’ practices against the state ideology replaced existing elite ideology. This resulted in popular incremental changes in conceptions of national understanding. After twenty-six consecutive years in power, President Lukashenka unintentionally unleashed a process of national awakening leading to the rise of a new sovereign nation that demands the right to determine its own future, independent of geopolitical pressures and interference. Introduction ugust 2020 witnessed a resurgence of nationalist discourse in Belarus. AUnlike in the Transatlantic world, where politicians articulate visions of their nations under siege—by immigrants, refugees, domestic minority popu- lations—narratives of national and political failure dominate in Belarus Unlike trends in the Transatlantic resonate with large segments of the voting public.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017
    United Nations A/72/493 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2017 Original: English Seventy-second session Agenda item 72 (c) Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives Situation of human rights in Belarus* Note by the Secretary-General The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, Miklós Haraszti, submitted in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. * The present report was submitted after the deadline to take into account information received by the Special Rapporteur during his trip to Minsk in July 2017. 17-16691 (E) 031017 *1716691* A/72/493 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus Summary The present report is submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 32/26. The report examines the relationship between the unique features of governance of Belarus and its situation of human rights. It concludes that one of the main structural reasons for both the entrenched systemic abuse of human rights and the cyclical waves of mass repression in the country is that all powers are assumed by the executive branch, chiefly the President and the presidential administration. Although the Constitution provides for the separation of powers and respect for human rights, the reality is a monolithic power structure with laws and governance aimed at maintaining the concentration of powers and an absence of effective human rights guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Belarus
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF BELARUS EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 17 November 2019 ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 4 March 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 2 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................... 5 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................... 5 IV. ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 7 A. ELECTORAL SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 7 B. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................... 8 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................... 9 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION .............................................................................................................. 11 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION .................................................................................................... 12 VIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ............................................................................................................... 15 IX. CAMPAIGN FINANCE .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]