Ghettos 1939–1945 New Research and Perspectives on Definition, Daily Life, and Survival

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ghettos 1939–1945 New Research and Perspectives on Definition, Daily Life, and Survival UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Ghettos 1939–1945 New Research and Perspectives on Definition, Daily Life, and Survival Symposium Presentations W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Ghettos 1939–1945 New Research and Perspectives on Definition, Daily Life, and Survival Symposium Presentations CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2005 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. The articles in this collection are not transcripts of the papers as presented, but rather extended or revised versions that incorporate additional information and citations. All the contributions were copyedited. Although the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum makes every reasonable effort to provide accurate information, the Museum cannot guarantee the reliability, currency, or completeness of the material contained in the individual papers. First printing, August 2005 Copyright © 2005 by Christopher R. Browning; Copyright © 2005 by Dennis Deletant; Copyright © 2005 by Dan Michman; Copyright © 2005 by Sara Bender; Copyright © 2005 by Alexandra Garbarini; Copyright © 2005 by Gershon Greenberg; Copyright © 2005 by Henry M. Abramson. Contents Foreword.......................................................................................................................................... i Paul A. Shapiro Before the “Final Solution”: Nazi Ghettoization Policy in Poland (1940–1941)...........................1 Christopher R. Browning Aspects of the Ghetto Experience in Eastern Transnistria: The Ghettos and Labor Camp in the Town of Golta............................................................................................................15 Dennis Deletant Reevaluating the Emergence, Function, and Form of the Jewish Councils Phenomenon ............67 Dan Michman The Białystok and Kielce Ghettos: A Comparative Study .............................................................85 Sara Bender A Tale of Two Diarists: A Comparative Examination of Experiences in Eastern and Western Europe.......................................................................................................................95 Alexandra Garbarini The Theological Letters of Rabbi Talmud of Lublin (Summer–Fall 1942) .................................113 Gershon Greenberg Deciphering the Ancestral Paradigm: A Hasidic Court in the Warsaw Ghetto..........................129 Henry M. Abramson Soviet Archival Sources for Studying the Jewish Experience during the Holocaust...................147 Vadim Altskan Appendix: Biographies of Contributors.......................................................................................159 Foreword In the ghettos of the Middle Ages Jewish contact with the outside world was carefully regulated. “The gates of the ghetto were closed at night—from the outside in those localities where the object was to confine the Jews, and from the inside where the gates served chiefly as protection against attack…. Seclusion from the outer world,” as The Jewish Encyclopedia vividly expressed it in 1903, “developed a life apart within the ghetto, and close communion among the members was in a certain way a power for good, fostering not only the [social and] religious life, but especially morality.”i A highly developed hierarchy of officials ran ghetto government, courts, police, and religious institutions. The last of the major ghettos established in medieval times finally disappeared with the European revolutions of 1848. Did the Nazi- and Axis-made ghettos of Europe between 1939 and 1945 share any characteristics with those of the Middle Ages? Clearly they were closed “from the outside,” but did Jews perceive themselves as better protected inside? For how long? And based on what assumptions, information, or lack of information? Furthermore, what were the aims and policies of those establishing the ghettos? How monolithic was the process of ghettoization, deportation, and destruction experienced in the most populous ghettos, those of Warsaw and Lodz? How different were the ghettos of Eastern and Western Europe, and what about the case of Transnistria? Can ghettos be defined with clarity or consistency in Nazi-dominated Europe? These questions beget further important questions about the nature of Jewish life—and the struggle for life—within ghettos. What was the nature of the “life apart” that developed within ghetto confines? Can we characterize civil and religious institutions, economic structure, family life, and cultural creation? For whom did the Jewish Councils—the Judenräte—work? For the perpetrators? For fellow Jews? For themselves? How did Jews subjected to ghettoization understand what was happening to them? Through observation and logic? Through a religious prism? On the basis of political ideology? And, if so, was it a Jewish or secular ideology? By psychological adaptation to preserve sanity? What were their responses to an unknown future? How did Jews preserve the dignity of life under Nazi onslaught? What of the strong, the weak, the rich, the poor, Jewish officials, and resistors? ii • FOREWORD These were some of the questions addressed during the symposium Ghettos, 1939–1945: New Research and Perspectives on Definition, Daily Life, and Survival, organized by the Museum’s Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies as part of its continuing series of scholarly symposia. The mission of the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies is to support scholarship and publications in the field of Holocaust studies, to promote the growth of Holocaust studies at American universities, to foster strong relationships between American and international scholars, to collect Holocaust- related archival documents worldwide, and to organize programs to ensure the ongoing training of future generations of scholars. The symposium was divided into two sessions. The first session, entitled Definition, Administration, and Resistance, began with Christopher R. Browning, Frank Porter Graham Professor of History at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Professor Browning discussed Nazi ghettoization policy in Poland, detailing the administration, stages, and motives of the perpetrators. Dennis Deletant, Professor of Romanian Studies at University College London, explained how the ghetto experience in the eastern Transnistrian town of Golta differed from ghetto experiences in German- occupied Europe, where Jews were concentrated in Jewish communities with established social infrastructures to assist them. Dan Michman, Professor of Modern Jewish History at Bar-Ilan University, reevaluated the emergence, function, and form of Jewish Councils, exploring their varied areas of authority and to whom they were subordinate. Sara Bender, Professor of Jewish History at the University of Haifa, compared the ghettos of Bialystok and Kielce, revealing that the process of ghettoziation, deportation, and destruction was not monolithic even in Poland. Lenore J. Weitzman, Clarence J. Robinson Professor of Sociology and Law at George Mason University, addressed the subject of kashariot, female couriers in the Jewish resistance who carried information, secret documents, and various forms of aid among the Polish ghettos, working to circumvent Nazi efforts to isolate the Jews.ii The second session, Daily Life, Culture, and Religion, “offer[ed] insights,” to quote the paper of one of our contributors, “into individuals’ ongoing attempts to make sense of and accommodate themselves to a world of constantly shrinking prospects.” Gustavo Corni, Chair for Contemporary History at the University of Trento, Italy, described daily life in the ghettos throughout Eastern Europe, detailing characteristics—overcrowding, hunger, contraband, religion, and culture—of the “life apart.”iii Alexandra Garbarini, Assistant Professor of History at Williams College, FOREWORD • iii contributed a moving analysis of two ghetto diaries, highlighting how Jews used theology, history, and rationalism to interpret an unknown future. Gershon Greenberg, Professor of Philosophy at American University, described the theological and religious turmoil of Rabbi Talmud of Lublin, who used the prism of religion to try to make sense of the ghettoization, deportation, and destruction around him. Henry M. Abramson, Assistant Professor of History and Judaic Studies at Florida Atlantic University, discussed the psychological and social mechanisms used by Warsaw Hasidim as they reacted to events unfolding in the ghetto. Vadim Altskan, Program Coordinator in the Center’s International Archival Programs Division, closed the session by highlighting opportunities for new research in recently released archives from the former Soviet Union, such as oral and written testimonies that reveal how Jews forced into ghettos made sense of what was happening to them. At the end of the symposium one of our panelists remarked, “There are so many questions and so few conclusions we can be sure of. Looking at ghettos from the inside out gives very different answers than looking from the outside in. How [can we, as scholars, best attempt] to encompass the diversity of [the ghetto] experience? It is clear that we are just at the beginning of this research[, and that] our generalizations must all be reassessed.” I hope that the seminar made a contribution to that crucial process. The symposium
Recommended publications
  • Adjud City Strategy Preface
    We, the Counsellors of Adjud City, are united today together for the first Adjud City Development Strategy 2007-2013, with one common goal: „During the forthcoming years to take unconditional active participation in the implementation of the City Strategy and provide visionary leadership, sound representation and prudent financial management” 4 My fellow citizens, visitors and friends of Adjud, In light of 1 January 2007, the day when our country will formally join the European Union, I am pleased to present to you the first ever Adjud City Development Strategy and hope it offers a constructive and useful outline of the goals our city administration has set out to achieve during the next seven years period ahead. Intended for a broad audience, this document is a summary of nearly one year of strategy-related work based on the views and recommendations of a number of groups, individuals and experts. Translating all the technical and consultative work undertaken into a comprehensive strategy document was no easy task. The work involved participatory process followed by valuable insight in identifying the right balance between competing priorities, various stakeholders and citizens’ needs and selection of key actions and policies, of vital importance for the future growth and development of our City. I would like to thank all participants who contributed to the development of the Adjud City Development Strategy. The analyses, consultations and surveys carried out by senior international and local experts and the engagement with the city administration generated thoughtful discussion and helped to improve overall the way we who work for the municipality see our role developing in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Entry Is Taken from the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman (Ed.), New York: Macmillan, 1990
    Koch, Erich (1896-1986), Nazi party functionary and governor of occupied territories. Born into a working family in Elberfeld, in the Rhineland, Koch graduated from a commercial secondary school and became a railway clerk. In World War I he served as a private, and when the war was over he fought in the ranks of the Freikorps - irregular volunteer units - against the French. Koch was among the first to join the Nazi party (his membership card was No. 90). In 1928 he was appointed Gauleiter of East Prussia, and in 1930 was elected as one of East Prussia's Reichstag deputies. When the Nazis came to power he also became the Oberprasident (governor) of the region. In 1941 Koch was appointed Reichskommissar of the Ukraine and governor of the Bialystok district over the objections of Alfred rosenberg, the minister of occupied territories in the east, who wanted exclusive jurisdiction in the area. Through these appointments Koch came to govern extensive territories, ranging from Konigsberg on the Baltic to the shores of the Black Sea. His treatment of the inhabitants of these territories was exceedingly harsh and cruel; his aim was to implement the ideas of Hitler and Himmler regarding the total subjugation of the Slav peoples. Koch frequently went over Rosenberg's head, although Rosenberg was nominally his superior. After the war, Koch lived for several years in Schleswig-Holstein, under an assumed name. He was arrested by the British occupation forces and extradited to Poland in 1950. In 1959 he was put on trial in Warsaw, and on March 9 of that year was sentenced to death by hanging.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIAŁYSTOK and KIELCE GHETTOS: a COMPARATIVE STUDY Sara Bender
    THE BIAŁYSTOK AND KIELCE GHETTOS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Sara Bender During the past two decades, scholars have written research reports and monographs about several Jewish communities in Poland that were destroyed in the Holocaust. Archivists in the United States and Israel conducted a massive campaign to gather testimony from Holocaust survivors and some of the major World War II and Holocaust testimonials have been computerized. An invaluable aid to those engaged in studying the history of the Polish Jews during the period of the German occupation, these tools have enabled scholars to conduct comparative studies of the ghettos—for example, of two ghettos in Poland (Białystok and Kielce) to which Holocaust historians had previously accorded scant attention. FROM SOVIET TO GERMAN OCCUPATION In accordance with the terms of the Ribbentrop-Molotov Treaty between the Third Reich and the Soviet Union, the Soviet Army entered eastern Poland on September 17, 1939, and, within a month, annexed this territory. One of the major cities annexed was Białystok (known for its textile industry), with a Jewish population of some 50,000. The remainder of Poland was divided into two parts: western and northern Poland, annexed by the Reich; and central Poland, which as of October 1939 became a single political administrative unit known as the Generalgouvernement; this unit was subdivided into four districts: Warsaw, Lublin, Kraków, and Radom. The city of Kielce, whose Jewish population in September 1939 numbered approximately 20,000, was located in the Radom district. The Soviets controlled Białystok for a little less than two years. On June 27, 1941, the Germans invaded Białystok and within a month imprisoned Jews in a ghetto.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Zero Hour 1945
    REVISITING ZERO-HOUR 1945 THE EMERGENCE OF POSTWAR GERMAN CULTURE edited by STEPHEN BROCKMANN FRANK TROMMLER VOLUME 1 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University REVISITING ZERO-HOUR 1945 THE EMERGENCE OF POSTWAR GERMAN CULTURE edited by STEPHEN BROCKMANN FRANK TROMMLER HUMANITIES PROGRAM REPORT VOLUME 1 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©1996 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-15-1 This Humanities Program Volume is made possible by the Harry & Helen Gray Humanities Program. Additional copies are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-2217. Telephone 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265- 9531, E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.aicgs.org ii F O R E W O R D Since its inception, AICGS has incorporated the study of German literature and culture as a part of its mandate to help provide a comprehensive understanding of contemporary Germany. The nature of Germany’s past and present requires nothing less than an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of German society and culture. Within its research and public affairs programs, the analysis of Germany’s intellectual and cultural traditions and debates has always been central to the Institute’s work. At the time the Berlin Wall was about to fall, the Institute was awarded a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to help create an endowment for its humanities programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Exorcisms? the Memory of the Communist Security Apparatus
    285 Stefano Bottoni PhD University of Florence, Italy ORCID: 0000-0002-2533-2250 SCIENTIFIC EXORCISMS? ARTICLES THE MEMORY OF THE COMMUNIST SECURITY APPARATUS AND ITS STUDY IN ROMANIA AFTER 1989 Abstract This article discusses the institutional attempts to deal with the archival legacy of the Romanian communist security police, Securitate (1945–1989), during the democratic transition in post-communist Romania. The first part draws a short outline of Securitate’s history and activities as one of the main power instruments of the communist dictatorship. The second part of the article shows the development of political attitudes towards institutional attempts to deal with the communist past in the post-communist Romania. This paper describes the reluctant attitude of the ruling circles in the 1990s towards the opening of the Securitate archives and the lustration attempts. The formation of the National Council for the Study of Securitate Archives (Consiliul Național pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securității, CNSAS, legally established 1999) hardly changed the general situation: the archives of the Securitate were transferred to CNSAS with significant delays, and the 2008 ruling of the constitutional court limited its lustration competences. The establishment of the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (Institutul de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului şi Memoria Exilului Românesc, IICCMER, established 2005) and formation in 2006 of the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship Institute of National Remembrance 2/2020 286 in Romania led by renowned political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu together with the research and legal activities of CNSAS contributed to a broader evaluation of the communist regime (although its impact seems to be limited).
    [Show full text]
  • JUDEȚ UAT NUMAR SECȚIE INSTITUȚIE Adresa Secției De
    NUMAR JUDEȚ UAT INSTITUȚIE Adresa secției de votare SECȚIE JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 1 Directia Silvică Vrancea Directia Silvică Vrancea Strada Aurora ; Nr. 5 JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 2 Teatrul Municipal Focşani Teatrul Municipal Focşani Strada Republicii ; Nr. 71 Biblioteca Judeţeană "Duiliu Zamfirescu" Strada Mihail JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 3 Biblioteca Judeţeană Duiliu Zamfirescu"" Kogălniceanu ; Nr. 12 Biblioteca Judeţeană "Duiliu Zamfirescu" Strada Nicolae JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 4 Biblioteca Judeţeană Duiliu Zamfirescu"" Titulescu ; Nr. 12 Şcoala "Ştefan cel Mare" - intrarea principală Strada JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 5 Şcoala Ştefan cel Mare" - intrarea principală" Ştefan cel Mare ; Nr. 12 Şcoala "Ştefan cel Mare" - intrarea elevilor Strada Ştefan JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 6 Şcoala Ştefan cel Mare" - intrarea elevilor" cel Mare ; Nr. 12 Şcoala "Ştefan cel Mare" - intrarea secundara Strada JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 7 Şcoala Ştefan cel Mare" - intrarea secundara" Ştefan cel Mare ; Nr. 12 JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 8 Colegiul Tehnic Traian Vuia"" Colegiul "Tehnic Traian Vuia" Strada Coteşti ; Nr. 52 JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 9 Colegiul Tehnic Traian Vuia"" Colegiul "Tehnic Traian Vuia" Strada Coteşti ; Nr. 52 Poliţia Municipiului Focşani Strada Prof. Gheorghe JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 10 Poliţia Municipiului Focşani Longinescu ; Nr. 33 Poliţia Municipiului Focşani Strada Prof. Gheorghe JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 11 Poliţia Municipiului Focşani Longinescu ; Nr. 33 Colegiul Economic "Mihail Kogălniceanu" Bulevardul JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 12 Colegiul Economic Mihail Kogălniceanu"" Gării( Bulevardul Marx Karl) ; Nr. 25 Colegiul Economic "Mihail Kogălniceanu" Bulevardul JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 13 Colegiul Economic Mihail Kogălniceanu"" Gării( Bulevardul Marx Karl) ; Nr. 25 JUDEŢUL VRANCEA MUNICIPIUL FOCŞANI 14 Şcoala Gimnazială nr.
    [Show full text]
  • BICICLETA III Reflexions Sobre El Internacionalismo 8
    III Reflexiones sobre el internacionalismo Osvaldo Bayer Imagen prohibida de Alemania Hace unos meses, el Instituto de Relaciones exteriores de Alemania, invitó al historiador cineasta argentino Osvaldo Bayer (autor de La Patagonia Rebelde ) a participar en un encuentro entre intelectuales alemanes y latinoamericanos. Se le pidió un trabajo sobre "La imagen alemana para un exiliado " pidiéndole que se expresara de forma personal y crítica, en base a su propia experiencia. Pero el sin duda esperado elogio de la democracia alemana en contraste con la sangrienta dictadura de Videla, no se produjo, y el trabajo de Osvaldo Bayer fue rechazado y devuelto con una carta del Director Organismo Günter W. Lorenz en la que le acusaba de formular «aborrecibles difamaciones la R.F.A.». Reproducimos el texto de 1a ponencia rechazada por su indudable valor testimonial e informativo. ¿Qué valor puede tener la opinión de un exiliado latinoamericano acerca de Alemania? ¿No significa esto pedir la opinión de un enfermo? Una opinión que puede variar entre el ditirambo de quien de pronto se halla a salvo y no teme ya oír el timbre de la puerta de su casa, con el consiguiente agradecimiento a la tierra que lo ha recogido; o, todo lo contrario, una acusación emocional, amarga, desesperada por saber que justamente aquí se elabora el sistema que ha hecho posible la tragedia del asesinato o la prisión de los amigos y familiares. De ver -en ese caso-en cada alemán el responsable de todo lo que ocurre a miles de kilómetros de distancia. Al decir esto último ya estamos en la dualidad vivencial del exiliado latinoamericano que se ve obligado a vivir en cualquier país industrial de occidente.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland
    Miranda Walston Witnessing Extermination: Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland Honours Thesis By: Miranda Walston Supervisor: Dr. Lauren Rossi 1 Miranda Walston Introduction The Holocaust spanned multiple years and states, occurring in both German-occupied countries and those of their collaborators. But in no one state were the actions of the Holocaust felt more intensely than in Poland. It was in Poland that the Nazis constructed and ran their four death camps– Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno, and Belzec – and created combination camps that both concentrated people for labour, and exterminated them – Auschwitz and Majdanek.1 Chelmno was the first of the death camps, established in 1941, while Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were created during Operation Reinhard in 1942.2 In Poland, the Nazis concentrated many of the Jews from countries they had conquered during the war. As the major killing centers of the “Final Solution” were located within Poland, when did people in Poland become aware of the level of death and destruction perpetrated by the Nazi regime? While scholars have attributed dates to the “Final Solution,” predominantly starting in 1942, when did the people of Poland notice the shift in the treatment of Jews from relocation towards physical elimination using gas chambers? Or did they remain unaware of such events? To answer these questions, I have researched the writings of various people who were in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” I am specifically addressing the information found in diaries and memoirs. Given language barriers, this thesis will focus only on diaries and memoirs that were written in English or later translated and published in English.3 This thesis addresses twenty diaries and memoirs from people who were living in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” Most of these diaries (fifteen of twenty) were written by members of the intelligentsia.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Redivivus
    alexander clapp ROMANIA REDIVIVUS nce the badlands of neoliberal Europe, Romania has become its bustling frontier. A post-communist mafia state that was cast to the bottom of the European heap by opinion- makers sixteen years ago is now billed as the success story Oof eu expansion.1 Its growth rate at nearly 6 per cent is the highest on the continent, albeit boosted by fiscal largesse.2 In Bucharest more politicians have been put in jail for corruption over the past decade than have been convicted in the rest of Eastern Europe put together. Romania causes Brussels and Berlin almost none of the headaches inflicted by the Visegrád Group—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia— which in 1993 declined to accept Romania as a peer and collectively entered the European Union three years before it. Romanians con- sistently rank among the most Europhile people in the Union.3 An anti-eu party has never appeared on a Romanian ballot, much less in the parliament. Scattered political appeals to unsavoury interwar traditions—Legionnairism, Greater Romanianism—attract fewer voters than do far-right movements across most of Western Europe. The two million Magyars of Transylvania, one of Europe’s largest minorities, have become a model for inter-ethnic relations after a time when the park benches of Cluj were gilded in the Romanian tricolore to remind every- one where they were. Indeed, perhaps the aptest symbol of Romania’s place in Europe today is the man who sits in the Presidential Palace of Cotroceni in Bucharest. Klaus Iohannis—a former physics teacher at a high school in Sibiu, once Hermannstadt—is an ethnic German head- ing a state that, a generation ago, was shipping hundreds of thousands of its ‘Saxons’ ‘back’ to Bonn at 4,000–10,000 Deutschmarks a head.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
    NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Meeting on August14th MAS Picnic Solar Eclipse
    July, 2017 Next Meeting on August14th The Milwaukee Astronomical Society will hold its next meeting on Monday, August 14h, from 7 PM at the Observatory. This is going to be a combined Board / Membership Meeting, where mostly organizational and Observatory related issues will be discussed. As always, the Observatory is open on Saturday nights, and also when it is posted Inside this on the Google Group. July meeting 1 MAS Picnic 1 MAS Picnic Solar Eclipse 1 Don’t forget about our annual picnic, which will th Meeting Minutes 2 be held on Saturday, August 5 at 4:00 PM at the Observatory. Come and join us, together with your Membership 2 family and friends. Treasurer Report 2 Please bring your favorite dish to pass. Beverages and charcoal grill will be provided. Observatory 2 Director‘s Report While enjoying the fellowship, you can take the opportunity to check out the modernized Quonset if Yerkes Star Party 3 you have not done so yet. Sun observation will also MAS Campout 4 be possible. See you there, in rain or shine! In the news 5 Adopt a Scope 6 Officers/Staff 6 Keyholders 6 Solar Eclipse The upcoming total solar eclipse on August 21st is easily the most anticipated astronomical event of the year. For many who get to view one of these, it becomes a life changing event. Some even go on to chase these eclipses throughout the world. Although our Club hosts certain astronomical events such as Mercury and Venus transits, lunar eclipses, we will not be holding an open house at the observatory on August 21st for the solar eclipse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust Perpetrators
    CLARK UNIVERSITY HIST / HGS 237 / 337 The Holocaust Perpetrators Spring 2017 Professor Thomas Kühne Time: Monday, 2:50-5:50 pm, Place: Strassler Center/Cohen-Lasry House Office Hours: Tuesday, 1-2 pm, Strassler Center 2nd fl, and by appointment Phone: (508) 793-7523, email: [email protected] Killing of Soviet Civilians in the Ukraine, fall 1941 1 Images of Adolf Eichmann: rabbit farmer in Argentina, 1954; “Anthropomorphic Depiction” by (Holocaust survivor) Adolf Frankl, 1957. 2 3 Description This course explores how, and why, Germans and other Europeans committed the Holocaust. It examines the whole range of different groups and types of perpetrators. We will be looking at desktop perpetrators such as Adolf Eichmann, at medical doctors who used Jews for their inhuman experiments, at the concentration camp guards, and at the death squads (Einsatzgruppen) as the hard core of the SS elite. Furthermore, we will investigate the actions, ideologies, and emotions of “ordinary” Germans who served in police battalions and in the drafted army, of women who served as camp guards and in the occupational regime, and of non-German collaborators. The course investigates the interrelation of motivations and biographies, of emotional attitudes and ideological orientations, and of social and institutional arrangements to answer why “normal” humans became mass murderers. Requirements This course will be taught in the spirit of a tutorial: once you decided to take the class, you are expected to stick to it, come to the sessions and be well prepared. To facilitate informed discussion, you are required to write a short paper of no more than one page (half of a page will usually do it) for each session, related the assigned books and essays.
    [Show full text]