<<

Photon Production from the : Taking a break from the bits

Paul Nation RIKEN / U. Michigan

6th Winter School on & Quantum Phenomena Essence of : [, p]=i

   1 (Δ )2 (Δ )2 ≥ |[ ]|2 A B 4 A, B

   2 (Δ )2 (Δ )2 ≥ x p 4 The is ALWAYS fluctuating:

Leonhardt, 2010 position (x)

Origin of some of the most important physical processes in the . Λ

large-scale structure These are all STATIC vacuum effects

DYNAMICAL vacuum amplification:

Dynamics driven by source spontaneous emission Casimir effect

Particle productionΛ

large-scale structure cosmological constant Dynamical Quantum Vacuum Effects:

    



       



 Dynamical Casimir Hawking

T ∝ a

    Accel

Parametric Amplifier Why so hard to detect?

Dynamical Casimir: N∝v/c - Need small mass / massless mirror.

Unruh effect: kBTU ∝ a/c - Requires very large . - Detector must be accelerating.

Hawking radiation: kBTH ∝ κ/c −9 - For small T H ∼ 10 K . - No way to verify photons come from black hole. Goal #1: #1: Introduce vacuum photon amplification effects, highlighting relationship to quantum parametric amplifier. I. Standard quantum effect. II. Workhorse of , circuit- QED,... nonclassical states, - duality, quantum erasers, quantum , heralded photons... III. Contains the basic ingredients of all vacuum amplifiers. Goal #2: #2: Demonstrate the use of superconducting circuits to realize these effects. - Low noise and dissipation. I. Photons can travel 10km before dissipation. II. Can maintain entanglement - Controllability on the single-photon level. I. Single photons on demand. II. Controlled generation of quantum cavity states. III. Nonlinearities on the single-photon level. - Single-shot photon detection (PRL 107 217401) I. Can detect and measure single photon pairs Parametric amplifiers: Castellanos-Beltran, Nat. Phys. 4, 929 (2008) Bergeal, 465, 64 (2010) Roch, PRL (In Press) (2012), arXiv:1202.1315 : Nation, PRL 103, 087004 (2009) Dynamical Casimir Effect: Johansson, PRL 103, 143003 (2009) Wilson, Nature 479, 376 (2011) Lähteenmäki, arXiv:1111.5608 (2011)

Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1 (2012) Classical Parametric Amplifier

Def: A parametric amplifier is a system that amplifies an input by varying a parameter () of the system.

So easy, a child can understand! Classical Parametric Amplifier

Don Case, Grinnell Classical Parametric Amplifier

L(0) Harmonic oscillator: θ(t)=θ(0) cos(ωst)+ sin(ωst) mωsl

Modulate center of mass ( ): ωs(t)=ωs(0) +  sin (ωcmt) if ω cm =2 ω s : t/2 L(0) −t/2 θ(t)=θ(0)e cos(ωst)+ e sin(ωst) mωsl Occurs only if system is initially displaced. In classical : θ(0) = L(0) = 0

Quantum physics: [θ, L] =0 θ(0) = L(0) = 0

Can parametrically amplify any state, even the vacuum!

Closely related to particle production in quantum theory. Prelude to quantum amplification Harmonic oscillator: H = p2/(2m)+mω2x2/2

[x, p]=m [x, x˙]=i

Work in : x¨ + ω2x =0

Decompose into creation and destruction operators:

complex conjugate ¯ † x(t)=f(t)a + f(t)a

“mode function” (not operator)

¨ 2 Mode functions satisfy: f(t)+ω f(t)=0 Plug x ( t ) into : demand = 1 for all time

    m m ¯˙ ¯ ˙ † [x, x˙]= f(t)f(t) − f(t)f(t) a, a =1 i i

Define inner-product: (Klein-Gordon inner-product)   ≡im ¯( )˙( ) − ( ) ¯˙( ) f,g  f t g t g t f t

orthogonal Gives: ¯ f,f =1 f,f =0

† ¯ a = −f,x a = f,x ground a = f,x mode state function

Ground state:a|0 =0 Want as eigenstate of H:

˙ 2 2 2 |0 = mx + mω x |0 H 2 2   2 m ˙ 2 2 2 m ˙ 2 2 = √ f(t) + ω f(t) |2 + f(t) + ω |f(t)| |0. 2 2  Solutions:( x zp =  / 2 mω ) ¯ f(t)=xzp exp(−iωt) f(t)=xzp exp(+iωt)

“positive frequency” “negative frequency” solution solution thus:   −iωt +iωt † x(t)=xzp e a + e a let us now modulate frequency (like the swing):

x¨ + ω(t)2x =0

( →∞)= in: ω(t →−∞)=ωin out: ω t ωout ain aout |0in |0out

fin(t)|t→−∞ ∼ exp (−iωint) fout(t)|t→+∞ ∼ exp (−iωoutt) In general, ¯ † ¯ † x(t)=fin(t)ain + fin(t)ain = fout(t)aout + fout(t)aout Interested in “out” state given “in” is vacuum - I know fin need 2 linearly independent solutions: ¯ ¯ f,f =0 fout = αfin + βfin using a out =  f out ,x  :

¯ † 2 2 aout = αain − βain ; |α| −|β| =1 Bogoliubov transformation

All quantum amplifiers can be cast as Bogoliubov transformations. if “in” state | 0  in , then particle # at “out” state:

† 2 Nout = 0|aoutaout|0in = |β|

Particle # at “out” determined by negative frequency † ( a in ) coefficient

2 |β| ≈ 0 ωout adiabatic ωin

time

2 2 1 ωin ωout ωout |β| = 1 − 4 ωout ωin δ-function ωin time Take home message:

All amplifiers described by Bogoliubov transform: ¯ † 2 2 aout = αain − βain |α| −|β| =1

Vacuum defined via positive-frequency ( ae − iωt ) components by choice of mode function. at “output” given by coefficient of ¯ † negative-frequency “input state”: βain Nonzero β generated by modulating mode frequency non-adiabatically. Vacuum Photon Production Methods

             

              Quantum Parametric Amplifier Simplest nonlinear photon interaction

signal ( ω s )

pump ( ω p )

idler ( ω i)

Energy conservation: ωp = ωs + ωi

Optical par. amp. needs nonlinear medium (BBO,KTP)

(2) Works for any system with effective χ nonlinearity. Will assume pump mode is classical drive,unaffected by loss of photons.

i.e. unlimited, fixed supply of energy

† † Hamiltonian (rotating frame): H = iη(bs bi − bsbi)

Pump amplitude in : η (frequency)

Two modes of operation: Degenerate (DPA): ωs = ωi

Non-degenerate (NDPA): ωs = ωi DPA

Solve Heisenberg Eq. of for bs = bi = b

b(t)=b(0) cosh (2ηt)+b(0)† sinh (2ηt) ,

Bogoliubov transformation: α = cosh (2ηt) β = sinh (2ηt)

If mode initially in ground state:   2 2 N = b†(t)b(t) = |β| = sinh (2ηt)

# of particles from vacuum DPA

If bs = bi = b ωp =2ωb (like the swing)

† † 1 = + , X2 = −i(b − b ) let X b b squeezing parameter 2ηt −2ηt X1(t)=e X1(0) X2(t)=e X2(0) Squeezed State

Ground State Squeezed state: 2ηt =0.5 2 2 X X momentum

position X1 position X1 NDPA More general case: ωs = ωi Heisenberg eqs. of motion: † bs(t)=bs(0) cosh (ηt)+bi (0) sinh (ηt) † bi(t)=bi(0) cosh (ηt)+bs(0) sinh (ηt) 2 Ns = Ni = sinh (ηt) In Schrödinger picture: two-mode squeezed state 1 ∞ |Ψ( ) = (tanh )n |  ⊗|  t cosh ηt n s n i ηt n=0 squeezing parameter Example of EPR state; mode-mode correlations stronger than classically allowed. NDPA What if only single-mode is ? ?

Can do a partial trace, or we can think about it ... Implicitly know energy Energy conservation of other mode Missing information Entropy

Find max. entropy constrained by energy NDPA Gives entropy for single-mode thermal state:   −1 ωs S = − ln 1 − e−ωs/kBT (t) − 1 − eωs/kBT (t) kBT (t) given via:  2 ωs tanh ηt = exp − kBT (t)

Temperature is determined by squeezing parameter.

Bipartite system so both modes in thermal state. Unruh Effect Simplest particle production method: just accelerate! Accelerating system called “Observer” Need two coordinate systems (constant a ):

a =0: Minkowski Coordinates (ct, x) a>0 : Rindler Coordinates (cτ, ξ)

Rindler coordinates defined by relations:     aτ aτ ct = ξ sinh x = ξ cosh c c ξ = c2/a

α = a/c frequency d - n s y w ” edge indler W ” via: partitioned into t Sections causall by horizon at Observer confine R Observer reache Minkowski space x edge

RRW future horizon future past horizon indler W eft R ct “L In LRW, moves backward in Minkowski time In LRW, LRW Can define Rindler coordinates are hyperbolas in Mi coordinates: Goal: Determine what Minkowski vacuum looks like in observers (Rindler) frame. Follow harmonic oscillator example:

I. Find mode functions & vacuum states in both space-. II. Calculate Bogoliubov transformation linking operators in both space-times. II. Evaluate number operator and determine . Minkowski Space-time: (inertial observer)  = M M +¯M M,† Consider scalar-field: φ uωj aωj uωj aωj j

Solution to wave equation: ωj = c|kj|−∞≤j ≤ ∞  1 2 2 1 ∂ − ∂ =0 M =  ikj x−iωj t 2 2 2 φ uωj e c ∂t ∂x 4πωj Minkowski time Vacuum state:  |0M = |0 M M |0M =0 ∀ ωj aωj j j Rindler Space-time: (accel. observer)

Defines vacuum in Rindler coordinates (cτ, ξ)

RRW:  proper time R R R |0 = |0ω  ∝ exp (− ) j uωj iωjτ j

LRW has its own independent vacuum state:  |0L = |0 L L ωj ∝ exp ( ) uωj iωjτ j

Positive and negative frequency switch roles in LRW! Need both LRW & RRW to get complete Minkowski

Guess the Bogoliubov transformation:

Remember vacuum defined by positive freq. terms

M = R + L,† | |2 −| |2 =1 aωj C1aωj C2aωj C1 C2

positive frequency in LRW

Minkowski vacuum should have particles when viewed by Rindler observer! Single mode transformations:

(1),M = R cosh ( )+ †,L sinh ( ) bωj aωj r aωj r (2),M = L cosh ( )+ †,R sinh ( ) bωj aωj r aωj r

Operators transform exactly like NDPA!

tanh r = exp (−πωj/α) squeezing parameter

Same two-mode squeezed state: 1 ∞ |0 M = (tanh )n | L ⊗| R ωj cosh r nωj nωj r n=0

particles in LRW particles in RRW Thermal state determined by squeezing parameter:

2 ω tanh (r)=e−2πω/α = exp − kBTU

Defines Unruh temperature:

α TU = depends only on accel. freq: α = a/c 2πkB Same temperature for all ; real thermal state (not true for NDPA)

Why thermal? Photons generated in pairs: one in LR Observer confined to RRW

ct

LRW future horizonRRW ?

past horizon

Thermal from lack of information due to presence of horizon. How do mode frequencies transform?

Plane wave: φ(x, t)=exp[−iΩ(t − x/c)]

Rewrite in Rindler coordinates:  Ω   φ(τ) = exp i e−ατ α

mode frequency exponentially red-shifted Red-shifting gives rise to thermal spectrum. - General property of horizons Where does energy come from?

Have assumed constant acceleration.

Acceleration driven by fixed amplitude, classical unlimited source of energy.

Exact same assumption as parametric amplifier. Note: Acceleration Temperature Decoherence Testbed for relativistic quantum information. Hawking Radiation Black Hole: Region of space-time separated from the rest of the universe by a horizon inside which is so strong that not even can escape. Schwarzschild black hole; depends only on mass.

Mass

Horizon

Horizon acts like unidirectional surface can go inside; can not come out causally disconnected from outside Horizon

fast

water

slow

water Horizons in the kitchen

Horizon Horizon located at Schwarzschild radius:

2 2 rs =2GM/c ABH =4πrs

Use Einstein E = Mc 2 for energy conservation relation

2 2 κc dE = c dM = dABH 8πG c4 surface gravity: κ = 4GM

The /mass needed to keep a small test mass stationary at the horizon as viewed at . Horizon unidirectional; mass can only increase:

dABH ≥ 0

Looks like 1st-law of thermodynamics:dS ≥ 0

2 2 κc dE = c dM = dABH 8πG

κ dE = THdSBH = λdSBH 8πkBc

Implies that a black hole has a temperature Hawking (1974) showed that it does: (Hawking temp.)

γ TH = γ = κ/c characteristic frequency 2πkB Hawking radiation as particle production:

oobserver aat infinity

It is the Unruh effect! Viewed by a different observer. Hawking radiation viewed at infinity γ = κ/c includes redshift factor: = | κ Var=rs  V (r)= 1 − rs/r GM a(r)=  2 1 − rs Energy r r

What does observer stationary at horizon see?

(a/c) α r → rs T → = Recover Unruh 2πkB 2πkB effect

Einstein’s Equivalence Principle in Action! Where does energy come from?

Energy in Hawking radiation must be balanced by loss of mass:   2 Mc − EH + EH

Black hole energy radiation energy

Black hole mass assumed fixed in calculation - Energy source classical & fixed amplitude

Valid only for large black holes: δM/M  1 Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) Dynamical Casimir (Moore) effect: - Boundary conditions lead to discrete mode structure. - “Shake” one of the mirrors:

2πc0 ωn = Modulates frequency λn changes 1D Mirror - Fulling & Davies:

    



   - Continuum of modes      - Path modifies exponent of modes negative frequency term

 iωu iω(u−τ ) path u dependent  e → e Can choose any mirror trajectory you like.

Experimentalist: Sinusoidal

Theorist: x(t)=−t − A exp (−κt)+B

Exponential red-shift of frequency & thermal state

     γ  T =    2  πkB    



 Dynamical Casimir Effect in Circuit-QED dc-SQUID

Φext through loop changes JJ characteristic energy scale

Φext EJ (Φext)=2EJ cos π Φ0

JJ Also can be thought of as nonlinear inductor:

Φ0 Φext L (Φext)= sec π 2πIc Φ0 Recall LC-oscillator: 1 1 ω = √ ω (Φext)= LC L (Φext) C Dynamical Casimir (1D type): Wilson et al., Nature 479, 376 (2011) Dynamical Casimir SQUID gives perfect mirror (g) boundary condition: 0     Φ(x = Leff ,t)=0 Sinusoidal modulation:

(h) 0  EJ = EJ + δEJ cos(ωdt)

 Effective length change: 0 0 eff = J ωd/2 δL Leff δE /EJ (i) Spectrum symmetric about: ωd/2 energy density

frequency Ω 100 a 90 80 70 20

60 Photon fluxdensity

50 15 40 –100 –200 –300 –400 –500 –600 –700 –800 10 100 b 90 5 Pump power (pW) 80 0 70 60 50 40 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Digitizer detuning (MHz)

25 e b 20 Two-mode  20 Data One-mode, –  Theory 15 One-mode, + 15

10 10

5

Squeezing (%) 5 Photon flux density Photon 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 Pump power (pW) 30 40 50 60 70 Pump power (pW) Dynamical Casimir (cavity type):

Microwave photons travel in medium (not vacuum)  2πcsq ωn = csq =1/ l (Φext) c λn per unit length fixed Dynamical Casimir: Lähteenmäki et al., arXiv:1111.5608 (2011) Experiment Theory detuning

Classical Cavity: 250 SQUIDs tunable by bias line Similar to Castellanos-Beltran 2007 & 2008 For single cavity mode:   δLeff ωd † 2 2 HDCE = a − a DPA Hamiltonian 4deff 2

             

              Summary Can learn a lot by playing outside! Surprising generality to quantum vacuum amplifcation. - Described by Bogoliubov transforms - Modulate system frequencies - Same quantum states - Same classical fixed amplitude * energy source approximation.

S I S I

P Thermal character of states vanishes!