DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing Scientific Capacity in the Global South

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Developing scientific capacity in the Global South Citation for published version (APA): Confraria, H. (2019). Developing scientific capacity in the Global South. ProefschriftMaken Maastricht. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20190508hc Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2019 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20190508hc Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement: www.umlib.nl/taverne-license Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: [email protected] providing details and we will investigate your claim. Download date: 24 Sep. 2021 Developing scientific capacity in the Global South Hugo Confraria © copyright Hugo Confraria, Maastricht 2019 Printing: ProefschriftMaken || www.proefschriftmaken.nl Cover image: Courtesy of Daniel Zeller and Places & Spaces: Mapping Science, edited by Katy Börner and Julie M. Davis ISBN 978 94 6380 326 7 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the author or the copyright-owning journals for previous published chapters. Developing scientific capacity in the Global South DISSERTATION to obtain the degree of Doctor at Maastricht University, on the authority of the Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr. Rianne M. Letschert in accordance with the decision of the Board of Deans, to be defended in public on Wednesday 8 May, 2019, at 10:00 hours by Hugo Confraria Supervisors Prof. Dr. Bart Verspagen Prof. Dr. Robin Cowan Co-supervisor Dr. Lili Wang Assessment Committee Prof. Dr. Fred Gault (Chairman) Prof. Dr. Robert Tijssen, University of Leiden Dr. Ismael Ràfols, Universitat Politècnica de València Dr. Fabiana Visentin Summary In this thesis, our objective is to provide a better understanding of how researchers, institutions and countries in low and middle-income regions can advance their scientific capacity and employ it for higher research citation impact, international collaboration, alignment between research priorities and social needs, and university-industry interactions. We raised different research questions and used different quantitative approaches in order to provide insights for policy makers to create and manage policies that promote the absorption, creation, diffusion, application, and retention of scientific knowledge in the Global South. The second chapter is the first study that creates a framework to analyse the determinants of citation impact at country level. It displays a U-shaped relationship between research citation impact and GDPpc and finds that previous citation impact, level of international collaboration and total publications in a specific scientific field are important determinants of citation impact among all nations. However, specialisation in particular scientific fields seem significantly more important in lower income regions. The third and fourth chapters combine unique survey data with bibliometric data to study the characteristics of highly cited researchers in Africa and which factors influence international research collaboration in Africa. The results are consistent with previous literature but discussed within the African context. In the fifth chapter of the thesis, we change focus, and we investigate to what extent health research capacity in Africa has been aligned with medical needs in the continent. We use text mining to combine bibliometric data from the Web of Science with the estimates of the disability-adjusted life years produced by the World Health Organization. We find that in sub-Saharan Africa most diseases with high disease burden are also the ones with relatively more research effort and that the resources used to fund that research come mostly from international research funders (public non-African and philanthropic). In the last empirical chapter, we study what kind of characteristics make research institutions more prone to interact with the private sector in Latin America. The main finding is that the scientific institutions that have a more diverse set of knowledge sources and are in brokerage positions at the national level, within their scientific discipline, are the ones that are working more intensively with industry. 5 Acknowledgments 7 Acknowledgments There are many people I would like to thank for their support during this thesis. First of all, I want to thank my supervisors; Prof. Bart Verspagen, Prof. Robin Cowan and Dr. Lili Wang who provided me with continuous support, guidance and intellectual freedom throw-out this process. Individually, I want to thank Bart for his rigour, vision and help in turning ideas into coherent research questions and chapters; Robin for inviting me to participate in a workshop in South Africa in 2016 and present some preliminary results of my second chapter. The ideas and intellectual exchanges during that workshop were essential to develop this thesis. I am also profoundly thankful to him for giving me the opportunity to do a 3-month research visiting in Stellenbosch, which allowed me to have access to some of the data that I use in the third, fourth and fifth chapter. I would also like to thank him for opening my mind to the social network analysis field; and Lili for always being ready to help at each stage of my research, supporting with all my technical queries and introducing me to several people in our field. I learned a lot from all of you! I am also very thankful to Prof. Fred Gault, Prof. Robert Tijssen, Dr. Ismael Ràfols and Dr. Fabiana Visentin for having accepted to serve as committee members and giving me great comments. The time and effort you took to review this work is highly appreciated. My sincere thank you also goes to my chapter co-authors, Manuel Mira Godinho, Charl Swart, Jaco Blanckenberg and Fernando Vargas. Without Manuel, I would not be doing a PhD. My journey in research started because of him and since then he has been a mentor and a friend. The contributions of Charl and Jaco were hugely significant to this thesis. Chapters four and five are done with data they collected and cleaned. At the beginning of my 3-month visiting in Stellenbosch I was unsure of what was going to happen. But you were extremely welcoming, and I think my time there was the most productive time of my life due to our continuous interactions. That visiting was not possible without the support of Prof. Johann Mouton and Prof. Catherine Beaudry. I am also profoundly thankful to them. Finally, huge thanks to my “cumpadre” Fernando. We did not manage to achieve our objective of having more papers together than Europa League Finals, but I think we can still do it. The thesis has benefited from comments, suggestions and data from many other people in conferences, workshops, poster sessions and other casual interactions. I want to thank Aldo Geuna, Eddy Szirmai, Pierre Mohnen, Renè Belderbos and Rodrigo Costas for their contributions particularly. I am especially grateful to my paranymphs and amazing friends; Cho and Mario. We made this journey together, and I hope we can continue to share trips, concerts, drinks and ideas in the future. 9 I have been lucky to be part of an incredible cohort at UNU-MERIT: Arip, Bruhan, Cho, Clotilde, Davina, Fernando, Francesca, Eli, Janyl, Jemal, Maria, Mario, Nga, Nora, Wondie, thank you so much for all the debates, dinners, drinks, parties and days together. Our first year was memorable! I am also grateful to my other UNU-MERIT colleagues, Allison, Bea, Caio, Charlotte G., Charlotte K., Dachi, Daniel, Danilo, Eleni, Elisa, Elvis, Emmanuel M., Gintare, Giulia, Ibrahima, Jenny, Joseph, Juanca, Julietta, Jussi, Lika, Lorena, Mary, Mira, Mueid, Paula, Racky, Sachin, Sheng, Shivani, Solomon, Stefania, Stephan, Tamara, Tobias, Victor and others for all the lovely time and experiences. I want to express my gratitude to the research and administrative staff at UNU-MERIT, who have been caring and helpful during the time I was at the institute as a student, tutor, seminar organiser and PhD representative.
Recommended publications
  • In a Finite World. Overshoot – CRASH!

    In a Finite World. Overshoot – CRASH!

    The Greatest Problem Facing Mankind Exponential growth, approaching infinity – in a finite world. Overshoot – CRASH! If you were asked what the greatest problem facing mankind is, what would you answer? Terrorism? War? The economy? Corruption? These are the topics on the lips of our politicians. But I would contend that our most vital concern is for the environment that nurtures us. In fact, we should probably celebrate Earth Day every day, thinking globally as one people on one Earth in one biosphere with one future. We’re all in this together! Crucial environmental issues concern ozone depletion, global warming, species extinction, marine habitat destruction and deforestation to name just a few. Overwhelming scientific evidence points to human activities as the primary cause of all of these problems. They imperil our very existence. At the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, just 200 years ago, our population went into rapid exponential growth. Now at 6.3 billion, we are experiencing a global increase of 250,000 more people (births over deaths) every day! It’s the equivalent of adding a San Diego to the world population in less than a week, all of Mexico in a year, and the entire North American population every three years. As our numbers increase, the numbers of many other species decline. Our population now exceeds that of any other primate species by over 10,000 fold; we are causing their extinction, literally by crowding them off the surface of the Earth. All living organisms, from simple bacteria to complex animals, are subject to the laws of Nature.
  • Solar Power Satellite System Definition Study

    Solar Power Satellite System Definition Study

    llllEING Volume I Solar Power Satellite Phase 1, Final Report Executive Summary System Definition Study 0180-25037-1 NAS_.; (. '.-.· /tc ;> 7c BllEING GENERAL #i ELECTRIC -r-GRUMMAN Arthur D IJttle Inc IRW ,, (!USA-CR-160370) SYSTE~ DEFINITION 1: EIRCUTIVE su"~\8Y 22e GJ/15 )-15636 T-1487 MA-731T : ;TEM 3 Solar Power Satalite System Definition Study Conducted for the NASA Johnson Space Center Under Contract NASY-1 S6.l6 Volume I PHASE I, FINAL REPORT Executive Summary 0180-25037-1 February !6. 1979 Approved By: f!i::t~ Study Manager Boeing Aerospace Company Ballistic Missiles and Space Division P.O. Box 3999 Seattle. Washington 98 ! 24 01~25037-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND I. I History --~-o.-.. ·------"_____ __ ...,_... ............. ·-- ~.... ..,.,.. ·---.... -­ Solar power has long been recogniud as an ideal source of energy for mankind. It is natur-.llly available and plentiful. does not disturb the envi­ ronment. e.g .. by creation of wastes. and is itself free. About ten years ago. a way of utilizing solar energy to gener-.tte electricity on a 24-hour continuous basis was proposed by Peter Glaser of A. D. Little. His proposal was to place the solar collectors in space. where they can collect sunlight continuously. can readily be aimed at the sun. and Figure 1. Solar Power Satellites: Th~ Principle where very brge collector areas can be obtained with relafo·ely litlle investment in material through the NASA Lewis Research Center to inves­ resources. Energy colleckd by these solar power tigate basic technical feasibility of the SPS concept. sat~llites (SPS's) would be transmitted to Earth by The conclusions of that study were that the system eledromagnetk .nc~ms.
  • Discover the History of Science the History of the Royal Society

    Discover the History of Science the History of the Royal Society

    Discover the history of science The history of the Royal Society Founded in 1660, the Royal Society is the Boyle and John Wilkins, the group national academy of science in the UK, soon received royal approval, and from made up of a Fellowship of approximately 1663 it would be known as ‘The Royal 1,600 of the world’s most eminent Society of London for Improving Natural scientists. Throughout our history, we Knowledge’. have played a part in some of the most life-changing discoveries, and remain The early years of the Society saw dedicated to recognising, supporting, revolutionary advancements in the and promoting excellence in science. conduct and communication of science. Hooke’s Micrographia and the first The origins of the Royal Society lie in issue of Philosophical Transactions a group of people who began meeting were published in 1665. Philosophical in the mid-1640s to discuss the new Transactions, which established the philosophy of promoting knowledge of important concepts of scientific priority the natural world through observation and peer review, is now the oldest and experiment, which we now call continuously published science journal science. The very first ‘learned society’ in the world. meeting on 28 November 1660 followed a lecture at Gresham College To find out more, visit: by Christopher Wren. Joined by other royalsociety.org/about-us/history leading polymaths including Robert Image: Illustrations showing microscopic views of seaweed and rosemary from Micrographia,by Robert Hooke, 1665. The Royal Society’s journal of the history of science. Editor: Professor Anna Marie Roos, University of Lincoln, UK.
  • Revamping Federal Climate Science Recommendations for the Next President of the United States

    Revamping Federal Climate Science Recommendations for the Next President of the United States

    GETTY SHIPING IMAGES/LIU Revamping Federal Climate Science Recommendations for the Next President of the United States By John Podesta, Bidisha Bhattacharyya, and Bianca Majumder December 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Contents 1 Introduction and Summary 4 Recommendations to restore scientific integrity across the government 9 Recommendations for rebuilding the federal climate science workforce 13 Recommendations to coordinate climate science in the White House and across the federal government 19 Recommendations to define interagency climate science research and data priorities 31 Recommendations for prioritizing adaptation and resilience 34 Recommendations to promote international coordination on climate science 40 Conclusion 41 About the authors 41 Acknowledgments 44 Appendix: References and further reading 46 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States has been the global leader in climate science for decades. Unfortunately, progress has slowed—and in some cases, even moved backward— over the past four years, with the Trump administration dismantling core elements of the federal climate science apparatus. As the country and the planet head toward an increasingly unstable climate, the U.S. government needs to get back to the business of being the preeminent source of trusted applied science that supports climate change mitigation and adaptation decision-making of governments and civilian stakeholders. The science is clear: To avoid the worst impacts of climate change, the United States and the world must take aggressive action to decarbonize all sectors of the global economy, protect the Earth’s natural systems, and limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. This means achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions globally by no later than 2050 and ensuring an equitable and just transition to a clean energy economy.
  • Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists' Data Sharing Behaviors

    Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists' Data Sharing Behaviors

    Syracuse University SURFACE School of Information Studies - Dissertations School of Information Studies (iSchool) 2013 Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists' Data Sharing Behaviors Youngseek Kim Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/it_etd Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Kim, Youngseek, "Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists' Data Sharing Behaviors" (2013). School of Information Studies - Dissertations. 85. https://surface.syr.edu/it_etd/85 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information Studies (iSchool) at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Information Studies - Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Institutional and Individual Influences on Scientists’ Data Sharing Behaviors by Youngseek Kim In modern research activities, scientific data sharing is essential, especially in terms of data-intensive science and scholarly communication. Scientific communities are making ongoing endeavors to promote scientific data sharing. Currently, however, data sharing is not always well-deployed throughout diverse science and engineering disciplines. Disciplinary traditions, organizational barriers, lack of technological infrastructure, and individual perceptions often contribute to limit scientists from sharing their data. Since scientists’ data sharing practices are embedded in their respective disciplinary contexts,
  • OPEN SCIENCE' an Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution

    OPEN SCIENCE' an Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution

    This work is distributed as a Discussion Paper by the STANFORD INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 06-38 THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF 'OPEN SCIENCE' An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution By Paul A. David Stanford University & the University of Oxford December 2007 Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 (650) 725-1874 The Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research at Stanford University supports research bearing on economic and public policy issues. The SIEPR Discussion Paper Series reports on research and policy analysis conducted by researchers affiliated with the Institute. Working papers in this series reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research or Stanford University. THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF ‘OPEN SCIENCE’ An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution By Paul A. David Stanford University & the University of Oxford [email protected] or [email protected] First version: March 2000 Second version: August 2004 This version: December 2007 SUMMARY This essay examines the economics of patronage in the production of knowledge and its influence upon the historical formation of key elements in the ethos and organizational structure of publicly funded open science. The emergence during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries of the idea and practice of “open science" was a distinctive and vital organizational aspect of the Scientific Revolution. It represented a break from the previously dominant ethos of secrecy in the pursuit of Nature’s Secrets, to a new set of norms, incentives, and organizational structures that reinforced scientific researchers' commitments to rapid disclosure of new knowledge.
  • The NSB a History in Highlights 1950-2000

    The NSB a History in Highlights 1950-2000

    The National Science Board A History in Highlights 1950-2000 NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD DR. JOHN A. ARMSTRONG, IBM Vice President for DR. MICHAEL G. ROSSMANN, Hanley Professor of Science & Technology (retired) Biological Sciences, Purdue University DR. NINA V. FEDOROFF, Willaman Professor of Life DR. VERA RUBIN, Research Staff, Astronomy, Sciences and Director, Life Sciences Consortium and Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Biotechnology Institute, The Pennsylvania State Institution of Washington University DR. MAXINE SAVITZ, General Manager, Technology DR. PAMELA A. FERGUSON, Professor of Partnerships, Honeywell, Torrance, CA Mathematics, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA DR. LUIS SEQUEIRA, J.C. Walker Professor Emeritus, DR. MARY K. GAILLARD, Professor of Physics, Theory Departments of Bacteriology and Plant Pathology, Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Wisconsin, Madison DR. M.R.C. GREENWOOD, Chancellor, University of DR. DANIEL SIMBERLOFF, Nancy Gore Hunger California, Santa Cruz Professor of Environmental Science, University of Tennessee DR. STANLEY V. JASKOLSKI, Chief Technology Officer and Vice President, Technical Management, Eaton DR. BOB H. SUZUKI, President, California State Corporation, Cleveland, OH Polytechnic University, Pomona DR. ANITA K. JONES Vice Chair, Lawrence R. Quarles DR. RICHARD TAPIA, Noah Harding Professor of Professor of Engineering and Applied Science, Computational & Applied Mathematics, Rice University University of Virginia DR. CHANG-LIN TIEN, NEC Distinguished Professor DR. EAMON M. KELLY Chair, President Emeritus and of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Professor, Payson Center for International Development & Technology Transfer, Tulane University DR. WARREN M. WASHINGTON, Senior Scientist and Section Head, National Center for Atmospheric DR. GEORGE M. LANGFORD, Professor, Department Research (NCAR) of Biological Science, Dartmouth College DR.
  • Information to Users

    Information to Users

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9505144 The effects of a cooperative learning instructional strategy on the academic achievement, attitudes toward science class and process skills of middle school science students Ahuja, Alka, Ph.D.
  • How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed Erin Mckiernan National Autonomous University of Mexico

    How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed Erin Mckiernan National Autonomous University of Mexico

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 7-7-2016 How open science helps researchers succeed Erin McKiernan National Autonomous University of Mexico Philip E. Bourne National Institutes of Health C. Titus Brown University of California, Davis Stuart Buck Laura and John Arnold Foundation Amye Kenall BioMed Central See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons McKiernan, Erin; Bourne, Philip E.; Brown, C. Titus; Buck, Stuart; Kenall, Amye; Lin, Jennifer; McDougall, Damon; Nosek, Brian A.; Ram, Karthik; Soderberg, Courtney K.; Spies, Jeffrey R.; Thaney, Kaitlin; Updegrove, Andrew; Woo, Kara H.; and Yarkoni, Tal, "How open science helps researchers succeed" (2016). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 24. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Erin McKiernan, Philip E. Bourne, C. Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Amye Kenall, Jennifer Lin, Damon McDougall, Brian A. Nosek, Karthik Ram, Courtney K. Soderberg, Jeffrey R. Spies, Kaitlin Thaney, Andrew Updegrove, Kara H. Woo, and Tal Yarkoni This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/24 1 How open science helps researchers succeed 1 2 3 4 5 2 Erin C.
  • FDA Science Moving Forward — Progress Report to the FDA Science Board’S Science Looking Forward Subcommittee

    FDA Science Moving Forward — Progress Report to the FDA Science Board’S Science Looking Forward Subcommittee

    FDA Science Moving Forward — Progress Report to the FDA Science Board’s Science Looking Forward Subcommittee FDA MISSION STATEMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 FDA’S UNIQUE AND CRITICAL ROLE IN ADVANCING REGULATORY SCIENCE................................................................................ 4 SECTION A. BUILD A STRONG FOUNDATION FOR REGULATORY SCIENCE ....................................................... 7 1. PROVIDE STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND VISION FOR REGULATORY SCIENCE ......................................................................... 9 2. ESTABLISH REGULATORY SCIENCE PRIORITIES .............................................................................................................. 9 3. OPTIMIZE ORGANIZATION, GOVERNANCE, AND REVIEW .............................................................................................. 12 4. ENHANCE RESOURCES AND INFRASTRUCTURE ...........................................................................................................
  • Richard G. Saull Department of International Relations London

    Richard G. Saull Department of International Relations London

    Rethinking Theory and History in the Cold War: The State, Military Power and Social Revolution Richard G. Saull Department of International Relations London School of Economics and Political Science Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D). University of London 1999 1 UMI Number: U121108 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U121108 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 r 765 9 fOUT*>L K 7II70Z Abstract This thesis provides a critique of existing understandings of the Cold War in International Relations theory, and offers an alternative position. It rejects the conventional conceptual and temporal understanding of the Cold War, which assumes that the Cold War was, essentially, a political-military conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that originated in the collapse of the wartime alliance after 1945. Using a method derived from historical materialism, in particular the parcellization of political power into the spheres of ‘politics’ and ‘economics’ that characterises capitalist modernity, the thesis develops an alternative understanding of the Cold War through an emphasis on the historical and thus conceptual uniqueness of it.
  • Experiments and Research with Humans: Values in National

    Experiments and Research with Humans: Values in National

    DCCUNBNT RESUME ED 125 906 SE 020 984 TITLE Experiments and Research with Humans: Values in Conflict. INSTITUTION National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.; National Endowment for the Humanities (NFAH), Washington, D.C.; National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 75 CONTRACT NO1-0D-5-2116 -------NOZE 231p. AVAILABLE FROM Printing and Publishing Office, National Academy of Sciences,72101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20418 ($5.00) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$12.71 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Behavioral Science Research; Communications; Conferences; Educational Responsibility;, *Ethics ' Federal Legislation; *Human Resources; *Research; Research' Projects;, *Scientific Research IDENTIFIERS *National Academy of Sciences ABSTRACT This book contains the .foraal presentations and discussions of a public forum organized by the National Academy of Scientes and held in February 1975. The topics discussed include informed consent by the research subject based on a full explanation of :what will be done, the workings of tyre ptocess, and the potential risks and benefits; research on fetuses\and on children.; research, participation by the,econosically poor,military personnel, prisoners, and the insiitutionalized; the teens used .to obtain volunteers for experiments; and the future role of federal legislation. A recurrent. theme, the balance between the promises and perils of human research and betwe'em societal and i dividual I, considerations, isemphasized. In addition, this v ume illustrates the successes and failures of,communication when a ontroversial subject is explored in a public arena. (Author /SD) ***********************************************************#***********- * Documents acquired by ERIC include many informalunpublished * materials not available from other sources.