DOCSLIB.ORG

Salt Lake County FHEA: Section 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salt Lake County FHEA: Section 4 SECTION IV DISPARITIES IN OPPORTUNITY Introduction The objective of this section of the FHEA is best expressed in the following quote from HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan. Sustainability also means creating “geographies of opportunity,” places that effectively connect people to jobs, quality public schools and other amenities. Today too many HUD-assisted families are stuck in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty and segregation, where one’s zip code predicts poor education, employment and even health outcomes. These neighborhoods are not sustainable in their present state. The data, tables and figures in this section provide current and historical context for evaluating equity and opportunity in the cities and neighborhoods of Salt Lake County. Ultimately the information developed in the FHEA regarding neighborhood disparities in opportunity will be integrated into the community development strategy to enhance equity and opportunity. Opportunity Index HUD provided an opportunity index to quantify the number of important liabilities and assets that influence the ability of an individual, or family, to access and capitalize on opportunity. HUD created five indices; school proficiency, poverty, labor market, housing stability and job access. With these five measures, a single index score or composite score for opportunity was calculated for each census tract by HUD. Using the census tract data BEBR created an average opportunity score and scores for all opportunity dimensions for the county and each city. These scores were calculated at the city level by weighting of census tract population. Table 1 Weighted, Standardized Opportunity Index Labor School Job Housing Market Poverty Opportunity Proficiency Access Stability Engagement Salt Lake County 4.3 5.4 5.0 4.9 5.3 4.9 Salt Lake City 4.5 6.5 5.4 3.7 4.7 4.9 East Side 5.8 6.5 6.7 4.2 6.2 6.3 West Side 2.3 6.5 3.0 2.9 2.3 2.5 Bluffdale 4.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 Cottonwood Heights 7.7 5.5 6.6 5.9 6.6 7.5 Draper 8.2 5.2 7.3 6.1 6.5 7.7 Herriman 5.0 1.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 Holladay 9.0 5.4 5.9 5.4 6.6 7.3 Midvale 1.6 8.3 3.2 3.1 4.5 3.1 Murray 5.2 8.3 4.8 4.6 5.8 5.9 Riverton 5.5 3.0 5.3 6.1 7.9 5.7 Sandy 6.2 4.9 6.3 6.3 7.4 7.0 South Jordan 7.8 4.1 6.0 8.5 7.6 8.0 South Salt Lake 1.5 8.5 2.5 1.6 2.5 1.5 Taylorsville 2.4 5.4 3.6 4.3 4.9 3.3 West Jordan 2.7 4.4 5.4 6.0 5.8 4.5 West Valley City 1.6 5.4 3.1 3.8 2.5 2.0 Unincorporated Salt Lake County 3.6 4.9 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.0 Source: HUD Spreadsheet for Sustainable Communities grantees. S A L T L A K E C OUNTY : F A I R H O U S I N G E Q U I T Y A SSESSMENT P A G E 65 The overall average opportunity score in Salt Lake County was 4.9, on a scale from 1 to 10. Although the county average was near the middle of the opportunity index scale, the cities in the county varied greatly. As shown in Table 1, the city-level opportunity scores ranged from as low as 1.5 in South Salt Lake to as high as 8.0 in South Jordan. Based on HUD’s opportunity index there are five low opportunity, four moderate opportunity and six high opportunity cities in the county, Table 2. Table 2 Low, Moderate and High Opportunity Cities Low Opportunity Moderate Opportunity High Opportunity Opportunity Index Opportunity Index Opportunity Index South Salt Lake 1.5 West Jordan 4.5 Herriman 6.0 West Valley 2.0 Salt Lake City 4.9 Sandy 7.0 Bluffdale 3.0 Riverton 5.7 Holladay 7.3 Midvale 3.1 Murray 5.9 Cottonwood Heights 7.5 Taylorsville 3.3 Draper 7.7 South Jordan 8.0 Source: HUD Spreadsheet for Sustainable Communities grantees. The HUD opportunity scores are mapped in Figures 1and 2. Figure 1 maps the HUD Opportunity Index score for each census tract in Salt Lake County, whereas Figure 2 maps the aggregate score for each city in the county. The census tract map tells a more detailed story of opportunity and shows the areas within a city that lack access to opportunity. This neighborhood detail is not captured in the city map. The two maps highlight clear differences in opportunities for residents on the east-side versus west- side. Overall, the west-side cities and tracts tend to offer much lower access to opportunity than the east-side cities. In fact, the only city to score above a 6.0 on the west-side is the city of South Jordan. Using only the tract data the tracts on the west-side of the county that scored a 9.0 or above were South Jordan and a sliver of West Jordan and Bluffdale. The largest disparity is between the mid-valley west region and the southeastern region, with opportunity scores ranging from 2.0 in West Valley City to 7.7 in Draper. Not surprisingly, the lowest opportunity tracts and cities are those with high rates of poverty and high concentrations of minority renters; the cities of West Valley City, Taylorsville, South Salt Lake and the west-side of Salt Lake City. These tracts and cities also have high Hispanic and minority concentrations. On the other hand, the east-side cities, especially in the south are relatively more affluent and dominated demographically by non-Hispanic whites. S A L T L A K E C OUNTY : F A I R H O U S I N G E Q U I T Y A SSESSMENT P A G E 66 Figure 1 Opportunity Index by Census Tract in Salt Lake County (1-2 opportunity poor to 9-10 opportunity rich) S A L T L A K E C OUNTY : F A I R H O U S I N G E Q U I T Y A SSESSMENT P A G E 67 Figure 2 Opportunity Index by City and Unincorporated Tract in Salt Lake County S A L T L A K E C OUNTY : F A I R H O U S I N G E Q U I T Y A SSESSMENT P A G E 68 Cities have been ranked by each opportunity dimensions in Tables 3 and 4. Those cities ranking in the bottom quartile are shaded. These cities have the lowest scores in the particular dimension. Salt Lake City west-side, South Salt Lake and West Valley City all rank in the bottom quartile in five of the six dimensions. Midvale ranks in the bottom quartile in four dimensions. Table 3 Ranking of Cities by Opportunity Composite, Job Access and Labor Market Attachment Composite Labor Market Opportunity Index Job Access Index Attachment South Jordan 8.0 South Salt Lake 8.5 Herriman 8.0 Draper 7.7 Midvale 8.3 Draper 7.3 Cottonwood Hts. 7.5 Murray 8.3 SLC East Side 6.7 Holladay 7.3 Salt Lake City 6.5 Cottonwood Heights 6.6 Sandy 7.0 SLC East Side 6.5 Sandy 6.3 SLC East Side 6.3 SLC West Side 6.5 South Jordan 6.0 Herriman 6.0 Cottonwood Hts 5.5 Holladay 5.9 Murray 5.9 Salt Lake County 5.4 Salt Lake City 5.4 Riverton 5.7 Holladay 5.4 West Jordan 5.4 Salt Lake County 4.9 Taylorsville 5.4 Riverton 5.3 Salt Lake City 4.9 West Valley City 5.4 Salt Lake County 5.0 West Jordan 4.5 Draper 5.2 Murray 4.8 Uninc. SL County 4.0 Sandy 4.9 Uninc. SL County 4.4 Taylorsville 3.3 Uninc. SL County 4.9 Bluffdale 4.0 Midvale 3.1 West Jordan 4.4 Taylorsville 3.6 Bluffdale 3.0 South Jordan 4.1 Midvale 3.2 SLC West Side 2.5 Riverton 3.0 West Valley City 3.1 West Valley City 2.0 Bluffdale 2.0 SLC West Side 3.0 South Salt Lake 1.5 Herriman 1.0 South Salt Lake 2.5 Source: Derived from HUD Spreadsheet for Sustainable Communities Grantees. Table 4 Ranking of Cities by School Proficiency, Poverty and Housing Stability School Proficiency Poverty Housing Stability Holladay 9.0 South Jordan 8.5 Herriman 8 .0 Draper 8.2 Herriman 7.0 Riverton 7.9 South Jordan 7.8 Sandy 6.3 South Jordan 7.6 Cottonwood Heights 7.7 Draper 6.1 Sandy 7.4 Sandy 6.2 Riverton 6.1 Cottonwood Heights 6.6 SLC East Side 5.8 Bluffdale 6.0 Holladay 6.6 Riverton 5.5 West Jordan 6.0 Draper 6.5 Murray 5.2 Cottonwood Hts. 5.9 SLC East Side 6.2 Herriman 5.0 Holladay 5.4 Murray 5.8 Salt Lake City 4.5 Salt Lake County 4.9 West Jordan 5.8 Salt Lake County 4.3 Murray 4.6 Salt Lake County 5.3 Bluffdale 4.0 Uninc. SL Co. 4.5 Taylorsville 4.9 Uninc. SL County 3.6 Taylorsville 4.3 Salt Lake City 4.7 West Jordan 2.7 SLC East Side 4.2 Midvale 4.5 Taylorsville 2.4 West Valley City 3.8 Uninc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Salt Lake County: Fair Housing Equity Assessment and Regional Analysis of Impediments
    Salt Lake County: Fair Housing Equity Assessment and Regional Analysis of Impediments Bureau of Economic and Business Research David Eccles School of Business University of Utah James Wood John Downen DJ Benway Darius Li Fair Housing Equity Assessment ......................................................................... 1 Summary: Fair Housing Equity Assessment, Salt Lake County .............................................. 1 Background: Demographic Change Through a Fair Housing Lens .................................................... 2 Minority and Hispanic Populations ................................................................................................... 2 Disabled Individuals ............................................................................................................................ 3 Familial Status ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Segregation ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty (RCAP) and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (ECAP) .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Disparities in Opportunity ......................................................................................................................... 8 Child Care Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 CRIME in UTAH Please Click on Page Title to Go to the Desired Page
    1998 CRIME IN UTAH Please click on page title to go to the desired page Utah State Uniform Crime Annual Report, 1998 Crime Trends - Ten Year Acknowledgments ........................ 3 Ten Year Arrest Data .................. 37-38 Summary Analysis ........................ 4 Population .............................. 39 Crime Factors ............................ 5 Index Crimes ............................ 40 Crime Clock .............................. 6 Homicide ............................... 41 Crime Cycle .............................. 7 Rape ................................... 42 Robbery ................................ 43 Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted in the Aggravated Assault ....................... 44 Line of Duty Burglary ................................. 45 Officers Killed - History .................... 8 Larceny ................................. 46 Officers Killed - 1998 ...................... 9 Motor Vehicle Theft ....................... 47 Officers Assaulted 1998................. 10-11 Arson ................................... 48 Property Stolen/Recovered ................ 49 Agency Information Juvenile Arrests ....................... 50-51 Local Agency Overview (Part I Crimes by Jurisdiction) .......................... 13-20 Incident Based Reporting Arrest Data by Agency ................. 21-22 Introduction - What is IBR? ................ 53 Arrest Data by Offense .................... 23 IBR Summary Analysis ................... 54 IBR Offenses by Agency ............... 55-58 Part 1 Index Crimes Breakdown Incident
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Drug Threats and Perils Facing Utah's Youth
    S. HRG. 106–1033 EMERGING DRUG THREATS AND PERILS FACING UTAH’S YOUTH HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 6 AND 7, 2000 SALT LAKE CITY AND CEDAR CITY, UT Serial No. J–106–101 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–821 WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:05 Sep 13, 2001 Jkt 073821 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\C821.XXX pfrm09 PsN: C821 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:03 Sep 13, 2001 Jkt 073821 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\C821.XXX pfrm09 PsN: C821 C O N T E N T S THURSDAY, JULY 6, 2000 STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE MEMBER Page Hatch, Hon. Orrin G., a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GPI), 1990 to 2007 Ar Repo T to the People of Utah
    The UTah GenUine ProGress indicaTor (GPi), 1990 To 2007 ar rePo T To The PeoPle of UTah A U t A h Vit A l S i g n S P r o j e c t oF t h e U t A h P o P U l A t i o n & e n V i r o n m e n t c o A l i t i o n AUTHORS & LEAD RESEARCHERS Günseli Berik, Ph.D., Department of Economics, University of Utah Erica Gaddis, Ph.D., SWCA Environmental Consultants Inc., Salt lake City, Utah RESEARCH TEAM Kenneth Bagstad, Ph.D., Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont John Lowry, Ph.D., formerly College of Natural Resources, Utah State University; currently at the University of the South Pacific, Fiji j A n U A r y 2 5 , 2 0 1 1 Copyright © 2011 Günseli Berik and Erica Gaddis. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent of the authors. The analysis and calculations in this report are based on the data spreadsheet available at: www.utahpop.org/gpi.html, where this study is also posted. Use of the data contained in this spreadsheet or the findings summarized in the report are permitted with proper reference. Suggested citation: Berik, G. and E. Gaddis. 2011. The Utah Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), 1990 to 2007: A Report to the People of Utah. Available at: www.utahpop.org/gpi.html. i CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................................ ix ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................................................... x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods Final Report
    Evaluation of Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods Final Report Russell K. Van Vleet, M.S.W. Robin L. Davis, Ph.D. Audrey O. Hickert, M.A. Edward C. Byrnes, Ph.D. September 30, 2005 Criminal and Juvenile Justice Consortium, College of Social Work, University of Utah Table of Contents Page TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................iv Section 1: INTRODUCTION Chapter 1: Introduction.......................................................................................1 Section 2: QUANTITATIVE DATA RESULTS Chapter 2: Offense and Prosecution Results ......................................................4 Chapter 3: Crime Mapping ..............................................................................14 Section 3: PARTNERSHIPS Chapter 4: PSN Accomplishment Timeline .....................................................26 Chapter 5: Key Informant Interviews ..............................................................36 Chapter 6: Statewide County and District Attorney Survey ............................49 Section 4: PSN AWARENESS AND TRAINING Chapter 7: Media Campaign Evaluation ..........................................................53 Chapter 8: Offender Notification .....................................................................66 Chapter 9:
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Crime Report
    2017 CRIME IN UTAH Utah Department of Public Safety Keith D. Squires, Commissioner Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification Alice Moffat, Bureau Chief 0 Crime in Utah |Table of Contents Table of Contents 2017 Crime in Utah Report Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Participating Agencies and County Coverage.................................................................................. 7 Crime Factors ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Index Crimes ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Summary Based Reporting and National Incident Based Reporting .................................................... 10 Scoring Offenses ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2017 Summary Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 12 Crime Clock ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Crime Cycle ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UCASA 2005 Annual Report
    PRESS KIT FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS REPORTING ON SEXUAL ASSAULT Dear Media Professional: The Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault (UCASA) is committed to advancing a society in which sexual violence is not tolerated. As a member of Utah’s media, you can help as you report on sexually violent crime in the state. This press kit provides sexual assault resources, facts, and tips on interviewing survivors of sexual violence. Unfortunately many myths about sexual assault are still prevalent in our culture and society and those myths may stand in the way of victims and perpetrators of sexual assault from getting the help they need. Rape and sexual assault victims in Utah are 90 percent more likely to be attacked by someone they know than a stranger. Victims and perpetrators of sexual assault can be young or old, male or female, straight or gay, wealthy or poor — sexual assault is a crime that doesn’t discriminate. By educating yourself on the dynamics and facts about sexual assault in Utah and the nation, you can help inform and educate the public about this crime and help advance a society that will not tolerate sexual violence. UCASA is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization and is the only organization of its kind addressing sexual violence issues statewide. UCASA serves as an umbrella coalition for rape crisis programs, victim advocate programs, and institutions and organizations that respond and provide services to victims of sexual violence. UCASA provides training and resources, and fosters a sense of community and statewide support. UCASA believes that through social change we can influence attitudes, beliefs and standards that will change people’s behavior from ignoring, excusing, condoning and even encouraging sexual violence to taking action, intervening, and promoting respect, safety and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH Council on C'riminal JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~ ~ '" ! I R '. This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in t~'o HeIRS data base. Since HeJRS 'cannot exercise contro,! Ovef the physical condition of the documents submitted, the il'ldividual fralM quality will vary. The resolution chart on , ' .~ ~.: 1 this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. :", ; 1.0 1.1 - - 111111.8 , ' 111111.25 111111.4. 111111.6 UTAH COUNCil. :J MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NJU!ONAL BUREAU o~ STAND,\QOS·I963·A ON C'RIMINAL Microfilminl procedures used to create this Hehe comply with JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION the standards set forth in 4tCfR 101·11.504 Points of view or opinions stated in this document an " those of the author! sl and do not repre~ent' th" official' .\ ~ ~, position or policies of )he U.S. Depart~entof Justice. • ,r ., , , i U.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE " , " LAW EHF,flRCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION . -} " Calvin Ramptonl Governor Room 30'l"State Office Building "ATIOHALCRIM~HAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE Commissioner Raymond Jackson, Chairman Salt I..ake City, Utah 84114 Robert Anderson, Executive Director WASHINGTON, D.C. 205'31 iJ· Telephone (801) 533·5731 " ~ 0 " >{ , ',' · , UTAH COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION III ___"""' ____ 4&....,. _J__ U_, _eLi_' ___ ~ __"--- _______._~_,--- __ 0_ •• RAVMOND A. JACKSON ,;" ''''''GoY,rnor c. "'.. ,," Chillman ROBERT 8. ANDEr>SEN' I DII,.loti ,J 1 I Dtat Council on Criminal Justice Administration J 304 Slale Office Building . Salt Lake Cily, UllJh B411~ • (801 )53'~5731 ;1 December 10, 1975 'I ,1 \ TO: Governor Calvin L.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Witness Report Garth Massey, Phd
    Case 2:12-cv-00039-RJS-DBP Document 183 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 39 Expert Witness Report Garth Massey, PhD RE: Navajo Nation et al. v. San Juan County et al. 2:12-cv-00039 CW, United States District Court for the District of Utah I, Garth Massey, declare the following: Personal Background and Research Qualifications Relevant to this Report I am an Emeritus Professor of International Studies (now Global and Area Studies) at the University of Wyoming. I was the director of the International Studies Program 1998-2008 when I retired from my position. My BA degree was awarded by the University of Missouri-Columbia in 1970. I earned the doctoral degree from Indiana University in 1975. The previous year, 1974, I joined the faculty of the University of Wyoming and remained a faculty member in the Department of Sociology at that university for three decades. My current curriculum vita is attached containing more details about my career, publications and other scholarly writing, research grants funded, and contact information. I have devoted most of my scholarly work in comparative sociological and interdisciplinary research to the topics of rural social change, social inequality, labor and work-related issues, and after 1988, interethnic relations and ethnic conflict. I have received fellowships, research grants and sabbatical leaves in order to carry out research in several parts of the world: Eastern Europe (Hungary and the former Yugoslavia), Africa (Tanzania and Somalia), and the Middle East (Israel and Palestine). My original interest in social change led to research projects in Wyoming communities that focused on energy-related community impact and changes in Wyoming’s labor force.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Crime in Utah Report Table of Contents
    2014 Crime In Utah Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Contents 2014 CRIME IN UTAH REPORT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Non‐Participating Agencies and County Coverage ..................................................................................................... 7 Crime Factors .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Index Crimes ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Summary Based Reporting and Incident Based Reporting ....................................................................................... 10 Scoring of Offenses ................................................................................................................................................... 11 2014 Summary Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Crime Clock ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 Crime Cycle
    [Show full text]
  • Alton Coal Tract LBA Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    CHAPTER 6. REFERENCES Alton Coal Tract LBA Draft EIS Chapter 6 References CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES ACD. 2004. Alton Amphitheater Coal Mining Project and Lease by Application. ACD, LLC. Prepared by Talon Resources, Inc. ————. 2008. Coal Hollow Project Mining Permit Application Package. C/025/0005: ACD, LLC. Albright, L.B., D.D. Gillette, and A.L. Titus. 2002. New records of vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Tropic Shale of southern Utah. Cedar City, Utah. Abstracts: 2002 Rocky Mountain Section of the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting. ————. 2007a. Plesiosaurs from Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) Tropic Shale of southern Utah, part 1: Pliosauridae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27:31–40. ————. 2007b. Plesiosaurs from Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) Tropic Shale of southern Utah, part 2: Polycotylidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27:41–58. Aoude, A. 2008. Personal communication between Anis Aoude, UDWR and George Weekley, SWCA Environmental Consultants, June 2008. Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2007. Preliminary radiation assessment. Cedar City, Utah. Prepared for ACD, LLC. Arabasz, W.J., J. Ake, M.K. McCarter, and A. McGarr. 2002. Mining-Induced Seismicity near Joes Valley Dam: Summary of Ground-Motion Studies and Assessment of Probable Maximum Magnitude. Salt Lake City, Utah: Prepared for State of Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration. Arabasz, W.J., R. B. Smith, J. C. Pechmann, K. L. Pankow, and R. Burlacu. 2006. Annual Technical Report: Integrated Regional and Urban Seismic Monitoring—Wasatch Front Area, Utah, and Adjacent Intermountain Seismic Belt. University of Utah, Department of Geology and Geophysics. Avian Power Line Interaction Committee/USFWS. 2005. Avian Protection Plan Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in Utah
    2017 CRIME IN UTAH Utah Department of Public Safety Keith D. Squires, Commissioner Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification Alice Moffat, Bureau Chief 0 Crime in Utah |Table of Contents Table of Contents 2017 Crime in Utah Report Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Participating Agencies and County Coverage.................................................................................. 7 Crime Factors ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Index Crimes ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Summary Based Reporting and National Incident Based Reporting .................................................... 10 Scoring Offenses ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2017 Summary Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 12 Crime Clock ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Crime Cycle ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]