DOCSLIB.ORG

UTAH Council on C'riminal JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UTAH Council on C'riminal JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~ ~ '" ! I R '. This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in t~'o HeIRS data base. Since HeJRS 'cannot exercise contro,! Ovef the physical condition of the documents submitted, the il'ldividual fralM quality will vary. The resolution chart on , ' .~ ~.: 1 this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. :", ; 1.0 1.1 - - 111111.8 , ' 111111.25 111111.4. 111111.6 UTAH COUNCil. :J MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NJU!ONAL BUREAU o~ STAND,\QOS·I963·A ON C'RIMINAL Microfilminl procedures used to create this Hehe comply with JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION the standards set forth in 4tCfR 101·11.504 Points of view or opinions stated in this document an " those of the author! sl and do not repre~ent' th" official' .\ ~ ~, position or policies of )he U.S. Depart~entof Justice. • ,r ., , , i U.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE " , " LAW EHF,flRCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION . -} " Calvin Ramptonl Governor Room 30'l"State Office Building "ATIOHALCRIM~HAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE Commissioner Raymond Jackson, Chairman Salt I..ake City, Utah 84114 Robert Anderson, Executive Director WASHINGTON, D.C. 205'31 iJ· Telephone (801) 533·5731 " ~ 0 " >{ , ',' · , UTAH COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION III ___"""' ____ 4&....,. _J__ U_, _eLi_' ___ ~ __"--- _______._~_,--- __ 0_ •• RAVMOND A. JACKSON ,;" ''''''GoY,rnor c. "'.. ,," Chillman ROBERT 8. ANDEr>SEN' I DII,.loti ,J 1 I Dtat Council on Criminal Justice Administration J 304 Slale Office Building . Salt Lake Cily, UllJh B411~ • (801 )53'~5731 ;1 December 10, 1975 'I ,1 \ TO: Governor Calvin L. Rampton and the Utah State Legislature ! The Council on Criminal Justice Administration submits the following report j ( of its activities during 1975. Since 1969, the UCCJA has expended almost $20 mi Ilion for improvements in the criminal justice system, These improve­ ments include criminal justice training, policy youth bureaus, a statewide juvenile court information system, criminalistic laboratories, penal code re­ visions, and the expansion of probation and parole services. This detailed progress report lists accomplishments and expenditures in the following program areas: target hardening, increasing the risk of crime, reducing juvenile related burglaries, information systems, communications, facilities, upgrading personnel, laboratories, planning and evaluation, legis­ lation, rehabi Iitation, transitional programs, judicial systems, and high crime area incidence. This report summarizes successes and lists problems to be solved in the future. With the improved evaluation of the projects in the program areas, the distribution of funds is be~oming morE~ reliable and effective. Respectfully submitted, ;f~(,,/&~ Rober't B. Andersen Director pi • ,1 ! OONAlD E. CHASE BRYANT H CROfT CO. 5Ti11UNG R. PIIOVOST ROSCOE GAIIRETT CUN OIIwnR ,. ~.:.'T~I:'~~. • Comm. Bo_ Eld., Co.. Judg •• Thl~ Dhttlcl Coun • UI. 51. Sr~ 01 HIQh., ~. • Com .. , Juob County • eomm. Soli 10k. City JOSII'H HUTCHINGS S. M..... K JOHN5OH PAuL C, ~BUR CURns R. !WIDING • N. "I'£TF' HAVW ..... D • MAIUOH HAZLFlCtl CIII.I, 51. Goorgo 1'011 •• Dopl. • Judge. 80untllul City Court. Judge, Utah Ju ....nll. Court Adm. Dept. fmploy. s.c. Capl. S. l~ Co. Sh,rtlt C!then ••pr.Mnklt'v. ;l;~.,. JAMES E. MANGuM REV. JERALD H. MtilRILL J. OUfl'l' P~ER • DAVID L WIUClN50H • pAUL S. ROSE, b. Dlr. • WSu~•.• D, ·PuTbALIllcalnT:~~:.n. 1IID1.NI~onT Do·IWRCo~!.·onDl.'. • JAMc·omam,F;.~~~o. • ~!"2. D, ...THAV • Mayor Ortm • Cld ••n I4:eptW ..nkltl.... • eo ... l. Counfy~.~m.y Au',. IdtcrTIey General o.pt~ 01 Social Servlu. r-" ... _" .. ,,-" """''' -, \~ I ;/ j i i IMPORTANT NOTE TO READERS Thi~ report is separated into two parts. The first part is for readers who want to learn as much about UCCJA in as short a time as possible. Part I gives a quick review of the program and its results. Part II is an' in-depth report on the programs of UCCJA and of their impact on crime in Utah. , I <I I If; I Ir 11 1 i I ,\ 'j \ I " .1 ij 1it :) " .\'I /,'! i Table of Conten!,! PART I SYNOPSIS OF PROGRAM PURPOSE, ORCANIZATION, AND ACHIEVEME.NTS Section Intl"oduction 1 COllncil 1 · . Staff 2 State Sel~v ices. 7 District Process 9 Comprehensive Plan 9 Objectives 11 Standatds and Goals 12 Effectiveness 16 Summary 18 PART II Section Page Crime Planning 2 Target Hardening 2 Increasing the Risk 4 Reducing Juvenile Related Burglaries 11 Summary 13 Support Systems 15 information Systems 15 Communkations 22 Faci llties 27 Upgrading Personnel 30 La bora tor les 37 Planning & Evaluation 41 Legislation 45 Rehabi Iitation 46 Transitional 58 Judicial Systems 58 District Progress 67 Technical Assistance 78 Conclusion 80 '/ Ii II .~ I PART I SYNOPSIS OF PROGRAM PURPOSE, ORGANIZATION, AND ACHIEVEMENTS Introduction ~, The Utah Law Enforcement Planning Counci I (U LEPC) was established by executive order in 1968 as part of thif Omni bus and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (and--aS renewed--of 1973). On October 1/ 1975, the counci I was expanded in size and redesignated the Utah Council on Criminal Justice Administration (UCCJA). The act states that crime is essentially a local problem and that the federal govern­ ment should support, but not supplant, local responsi bi I ities f0r law enforcement. The act is based on the premise that comprehensive planning, focused on state and local evaluation of law-enforcement and criminal-justice pl"oblems, can result in preventing and controlling crime, increasing public safety, and effectively using federal and local funds. The program is managed through the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA), established within the United States Depart- rrM~nt of Justic,e. The Omnibus Crime Control Act, as administered in Utah by the Council on Criminal Justice Administration, assists state and local governments in improving and I strengthening criminal-justice programs. Assistance is provided in the form of planning and action grants. ' Planning grants are provided to the seven local associations of governments to develop multi-county (district) plans that are illcorporated into a statewide plan. OVel' $450,000 is spent annu~lIy for planning programs at the district and state levels. Action grants consist of money granted to state and local units of government to help finance projects which will improve certain aspects of the criminal-justice system. Approximately $4 million is spent each year for action projects. Since 1969, The Omnibus Act has brought over $20 million to Utah for planning and implementation of programs to improve the aiminal-justice system. These monies have been allocated in acc::ordance with annually developed comprehensive statewide plans. These plans are based on local criminal-justice plans, analysis of system operations and crime problems, state and local agency needs and capabilities, and the progress of past planning efforts. I .,I tounci I The UCCJA was established by executive order in 1968. Since that time, the federa I I enabling legislation and the state executive order have been amended several times, f , ! ·1 ~- 2 -3- /> FIGURE 1: responsibilities of the UCCJA have increas~d, and the funds administered have UTl~.H COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION grown substantially. (Odobel", 1975) The 27-member Counci I of Criminal Justice Admin istration directs the planning and funding actlvi ties of this program. Members are appointed by the governor to Commissioner Raymond A. Jackson, Chairman represent all interests and geographical areas of the state. Counci I members are Department of Public Safety indicated in Figure 1. The govel"norls executive order of June 3, 1975 assigns UCCJA four duties: Mr. D. Gilbert Athay Mr. Gerald Bonser Utah State Bar .Assoc., Defense Moab CHy Councilman 1. To develop a comprehensive, long-range plan for strengthening and improvin~\ law enforcement and the administration of criminal 'Justice, .. Commissioner Melvin J. Burke Mrs. Barbara Burnett Uintah County Commission C it! zen Representative 2. To coordinate programs and projects far state and local governments for improvement in law enforcement. Commissioner George Buzianis Commissioner Donald E, Chase Tooele County Commission Box Elder Coun~y Commission 3. To apply for and accept grants from the Law Enforcement Assistance Adminis- tration. and other government or private agencies, and to approve expendi ture. Judge Bryant H. Croft G. Horner Durham, Commissioner of such funds ... consistent with ... the statewide Comprehensive Plan. Thi rd District Cnl.:rt State System of Higher Education 4. To establish goals and standards for Utah's criminal justice system, and to Commi ssioner Roscoe Garrett Commissioner Glen Greener relate these standards to a timetable for implementation. Juab County Commission Salt Lake City Commission The council Is divided into five committees to assist in the accomplishment of these Mr. Curtis P. Harding, Administrator Capt. Norman "Pete" Hayward tasks. The organization and responsibi lity of the counci I and its members are Dept. of Employment Security Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office shown in Figure 2. Each committee has from five to seven members and performs delegated functions such as development and monitoring of programs, application Mr. Marion Hazleton Sheriff Rex Huntsman approval, and evaluation. Citizen Representative Sevier' County Sheriff UCCJA helps plan for improvement with all of Utah's 424 criminal-justice agencies. Mr. Alex Hurtado Chief Joseph Hutchings UCCJA does not allocate all criminal-justice resources. Seven percent of ali Ogden City Councilman St. George City Pol ice Dept. expenditures for the state's criminal-justice system are under the council's responsibi lity, and 58.5 percent of this amount is made available to city and Judge S. Marl< John!:ion Judge Paul C. Keller county governments for local use. BountiflJI City Court Utah Juvenile. Court Mayor James E. Mangum Rev. Jerald H. Meri~i11 Staff Mayor :qf Orem Citizen Representative Mr. J. Duffy Palmer Mr. Vernon B. Romney The counci I is assisted in achieving its tasks by state and local staffs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Salt Lake County: Fair Housing Equity Assessment and Regional Analysis of Impediments
    Salt Lake County: Fair Housing Equity Assessment and Regional Analysis of Impediments Bureau of Economic and Business Research David Eccles School of Business University of Utah James Wood John Downen DJ Benway Darius Li Fair Housing Equity Assessment ......................................................................... 1 Summary: Fair Housing Equity Assessment, Salt Lake County .............................................. 1 Background: Demographic Change Through a Fair Housing Lens .................................................... 2 Minority and Hispanic Populations ................................................................................................... 2 Disabled Individuals ............................................................................................................................ 3 Familial Status ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Segregation ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty (RCAP) and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (ECAP) .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Disparities in Opportunity ......................................................................................................................... 8 Child Care Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 CRIME in UTAH Please Click on Page Title to Go to the Desired Page
    1998 CRIME IN UTAH Please click on page title to go to the desired page Utah State Uniform Crime Annual Report, 1998 Crime Trends - Ten Year Acknowledgments ........................ 3 Ten Year Arrest Data .................. 37-38 Summary Analysis ........................ 4 Population .............................. 39 Crime Factors ............................ 5 Index Crimes ............................ 40 Crime Clock .............................. 6 Homicide ............................... 41 Crime Cycle .............................. 7 Rape ................................... 42 Robbery ................................ 43 Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted in the Aggravated Assault ....................... 44 Line of Duty Burglary ................................. 45 Officers Killed - History .................... 8 Larceny ................................. 46 Officers Killed - 1998 ...................... 9 Motor Vehicle Theft ....................... 47 Officers Assaulted 1998................. 10-11 Arson ................................... 48 Property Stolen/Recovered ................ 49 Agency Information Juvenile Arrests ....................... 50-51 Local Agency Overview (Part I Crimes by Jurisdiction) .......................... 13-20 Incident Based Reporting Arrest Data by Agency ................. 21-22 Introduction - What is IBR? ................ 53 Arrest Data by Offense .................... 23 IBR Summary Analysis ................... 54 IBR Offenses by Agency ............... 55-58 Part 1 Index Crimes Breakdown Incident
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Drug Threats and Perils Facing Utah's Youth
    S. HRG. 106–1033 EMERGING DRUG THREATS AND PERILS FACING UTAH’S YOUTH HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 6 AND 7, 2000 SALT LAKE CITY AND CEDAR CITY, UT Serial No. J–106–101 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–821 WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:05 Sep 13, 2001 Jkt 073821 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\C821.XXX pfrm09 PsN: C821 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:03 Sep 13, 2001 Jkt 073821 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\C821.XXX pfrm09 PsN: C821 C O N T E N T S THURSDAY, JULY 6, 2000 STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE MEMBER Page Hatch, Hon. Orrin G., a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GPI), 1990 to 2007 Ar Repo T to the People of Utah
    The UTah GenUine ProGress indicaTor (GPi), 1990 To 2007 ar rePo T To The PeoPle of UTah A U t A h Vit A l S i g n S P r o j e c t oF t h e U t A h P o P U l A t i o n & e n V i r o n m e n t c o A l i t i o n AUTHORS & LEAD RESEARCHERS Günseli Berik, Ph.D., Department of Economics, University of Utah Erica Gaddis, Ph.D., SWCA Environmental Consultants Inc., Salt lake City, Utah RESEARCH TEAM Kenneth Bagstad, Ph.D., Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont John Lowry, Ph.D., formerly College of Natural Resources, Utah State University; currently at the University of the South Pacific, Fiji j A n U A r y 2 5 , 2 0 1 1 Copyright © 2011 Günseli Berik and Erica Gaddis. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written consent of the authors. The analysis and calculations in this report are based on the data spreadsheet available at: www.utahpop.org/gpi.html, where this study is also posted. Use of the data contained in this spreadsheet or the findings summarized in the report are permitted with proper reference. Suggested citation: Berik, G. and E. Gaddis. 2011. The Utah Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), 1990 to 2007: A Report to the People of Utah. Available at: www.utahpop.org/gpi.html. i CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER ................................................................................................................................ ix ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................................................... x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods Final Report
    Evaluation of Utah Project Safe Neighborhoods Final Report Russell K. Van Vleet, M.S.W. Robin L. Davis, Ph.D. Audrey O. Hickert, M.A. Edward C. Byrnes, Ph.D. September 30, 2005 Criminal and Juvenile Justice Consortium, College of Social Work, University of Utah Table of Contents Page TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................iv Section 1: INTRODUCTION Chapter 1: Introduction.......................................................................................1 Section 2: QUANTITATIVE DATA RESULTS Chapter 2: Offense and Prosecution Results ......................................................4 Chapter 3: Crime Mapping ..............................................................................14 Section 3: PARTNERSHIPS Chapter 4: PSN Accomplishment Timeline .....................................................26 Chapter 5: Key Informant Interviews ..............................................................36 Chapter 6: Statewide County and District Attorney Survey ............................49 Section 4: PSN AWARENESS AND TRAINING Chapter 7: Media Campaign Evaluation ..........................................................53 Chapter 8: Offender Notification .....................................................................66 Chapter 9:
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Crime Report
    2017 CRIME IN UTAH Utah Department of Public Safety Keith D. Squires, Commissioner Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification Alice Moffat, Bureau Chief 0 Crime in Utah |Table of Contents Table of Contents 2017 Crime in Utah Report Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Participating Agencies and County Coverage.................................................................................. 7 Crime Factors ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Index Crimes ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Summary Based Reporting and National Incident Based Reporting .................................................... 10 Scoring Offenses ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2017 Summary Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 12 Crime Clock ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Crime Cycle ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UCASA 2005 Annual Report
    PRESS KIT FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS REPORTING ON SEXUAL ASSAULT Dear Media Professional: The Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault (UCASA) is committed to advancing a society in which sexual violence is not tolerated. As a member of Utah’s media, you can help as you report on sexually violent crime in the state. This press kit provides sexual assault resources, facts, and tips on interviewing survivors of sexual violence. Unfortunately many myths about sexual assault are still prevalent in our culture and society and those myths may stand in the way of victims and perpetrators of sexual assault from getting the help they need. Rape and sexual assault victims in Utah are 90 percent more likely to be attacked by someone they know than a stranger. Victims and perpetrators of sexual assault can be young or old, male or female, straight or gay, wealthy or poor — sexual assault is a crime that doesn’t discriminate. By educating yourself on the dynamics and facts about sexual assault in Utah and the nation, you can help inform and educate the public about this crime and help advance a society that will not tolerate sexual violence. UCASA is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization and is the only organization of its kind addressing sexual violence issues statewide. UCASA serves as an umbrella coalition for rape crisis programs, victim advocate programs, and institutions and organizations that respond and provide services to victims of sexual violence. UCASA provides training and resources, and fosters a sense of community and statewide support. UCASA believes that through social change we can influence attitudes, beliefs and standards that will change people’s behavior from ignoring, excusing, condoning and even encouraging sexual violence to taking action, intervening, and promoting respect, safety and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Witness Report Garth Massey, Phd
    Case 2:12-cv-00039-RJS-DBP Document 183 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 39 Expert Witness Report Garth Massey, PhD RE: Navajo Nation et al. v. San Juan County et al. 2:12-cv-00039 CW, United States District Court for the District of Utah I, Garth Massey, declare the following: Personal Background and Research Qualifications Relevant to this Report I am an Emeritus Professor of International Studies (now Global and Area Studies) at the University of Wyoming. I was the director of the International Studies Program 1998-2008 when I retired from my position. My BA degree was awarded by the University of Missouri-Columbia in 1970. I earned the doctoral degree from Indiana University in 1975. The previous year, 1974, I joined the faculty of the University of Wyoming and remained a faculty member in the Department of Sociology at that university for three decades. My current curriculum vita is attached containing more details about my career, publications and other scholarly writing, research grants funded, and contact information. I have devoted most of my scholarly work in comparative sociological and interdisciplinary research to the topics of rural social change, social inequality, labor and work-related issues, and after 1988, interethnic relations and ethnic conflict. I have received fellowships, research grants and sabbatical leaves in order to carry out research in several parts of the world: Eastern Europe (Hungary and the former Yugoslavia), Africa (Tanzania and Somalia), and the Middle East (Israel and Palestine). My original interest in social change led to research projects in Wyoming communities that focused on energy-related community impact and changes in Wyoming’s labor force.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Crime in Utah Report Table of Contents
    2014 Crime In Utah Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Contents 2014 CRIME IN UTAH REPORT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Non‐Participating Agencies and County Coverage ..................................................................................................... 7 Crime Factors .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Index Crimes ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Summary Based Reporting and Incident Based Reporting ....................................................................................... 10 Scoring of Offenses ................................................................................................................................................... 11 2014 Summary Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Crime Clock ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 Crime Cycle
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake County FHEA: Section 4
    SECTION IV DISPARITIES IN OPPORTUNITY Introduction The objective of this section of the FHEA is best expressed in the following quote from HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan. Sustainability also means creating “geographies of opportunity,” places that effectively connect people to jobs, quality public schools and other amenities. Today too many HUD-assisted families are stuck in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty and segregation, where one’s zip code predicts poor education, employment and even health outcomes. These neighborhoods are not sustainable in their present state. The data, tables and figures in this section provide current and historical context for evaluating equity and opportunity in the cities and neighborhoods of Salt Lake County. Ultimately the information developed in the FHEA regarding neighborhood disparities in opportunity will be integrated into the community development strategy to enhance equity and opportunity. Opportunity Index HUD provided an opportunity index to quantify the number of important liabilities and assets that influence the ability of an individual, or family, to access and capitalize on opportunity. HUD created five indices; school proficiency, poverty, labor market, housing stability and job access. With these five measures, a single index score or composite score for opportunity was calculated for each census tract by HUD. Using the census tract data BEBR created an average opportunity score and scores for all opportunity dimensions for the county and each city. These scores were calculated at the
    [Show full text]
  • Alton Coal Tract LBA Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    CHAPTER 6. REFERENCES Alton Coal Tract LBA Draft EIS Chapter 6 References CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES ACD. 2004. Alton Amphitheater Coal Mining Project and Lease by Application. ACD, LLC. Prepared by Talon Resources, Inc. ————. 2008. Coal Hollow Project Mining Permit Application Package. C/025/0005: ACD, LLC. Albright, L.B., D.D. Gillette, and A.L. Titus. 2002. New records of vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Tropic Shale of southern Utah. Cedar City, Utah. Abstracts: 2002 Rocky Mountain Section of the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting. ————. 2007a. Plesiosaurs from Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) Tropic Shale of southern Utah, part 1: Pliosauridae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27:31–40. ————. 2007b. Plesiosaurs from Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) Tropic Shale of southern Utah, part 2: Polycotylidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27:41–58. Aoude, A. 2008. Personal communication between Anis Aoude, UDWR and George Weekley, SWCA Environmental Consultants, June 2008. Applied Geotechnical Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2007. Preliminary radiation assessment. Cedar City, Utah. Prepared for ACD, LLC. Arabasz, W.J., J. Ake, M.K. McCarter, and A. McGarr. 2002. Mining-Induced Seismicity near Joes Valley Dam: Summary of Ground-Motion Studies and Assessment of Probable Maximum Magnitude. Salt Lake City, Utah: Prepared for State of Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration. Arabasz, W.J., R. B. Smith, J. C. Pechmann, K. L. Pankow, and R. Burlacu. 2006. Annual Technical Report: Integrated Regional and Urban Seismic Monitoring—Wasatch Front Area, Utah, and Adjacent Intermountain Seismic Belt. University of Utah, Department of Geology and Geophysics. Avian Power Line Interaction Committee/USFWS. 2005. Avian Protection Plan Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in Utah
    2017 CRIME IN UTAH Utah Department of Public Safety Keith D. Squires, Commissioner Utah Bureau of Criminal Identification Alice Moffat, Bureau Chief 0 Crime in Utah |Table of Contents Table of Contents 2017 Crime in Utah Report Introduction ..................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Participating Agencies and County Coverage.................................................................................. 7 Crime Factors ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Index Crimes ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Summary Based Reporting and National Incident Based Reporting .................................................... 10 Scoring Offenses ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2017 Summary Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 12 Crime Clock ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Crime Cycle ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]