Vector Limited and Contact Energy Limited Notice Seeking Clearance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Decision No 540
PUBLIC VERSION ISSN NO. 0114-2720 J6822 Commerce Commission Decision No 540 Determination pursuant to the Commerce Act 1986 in the matter of an application for clearance of a business acquisition involving: VECTOR LIMITED and NGC HOLDINGS LIMITED The Commission: P R Rebstock D R Bates QC D F Curtin Summary of Application: Vector Limited or an interconnected body corporate has sought clearance to acquire, whether directly or indirectly, up to and including 100% of the shares in NGC Holdings Limited Determination: Pursuant to section 66(3) (a)/(b) of the Commerce Act 1986, the Commission determines to give clearance to the proposed acquisition. Date of Determination: 10 December 2004 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL IN THIS REPORT IS CONTAINED IN SQUARE BRACKETS 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE PROPOSAL ....................................................................................................................4 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK..............................................................................................4 ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK............................................................................................4 THE PARTIES.........................................................................................................................5 Vector....................................................................................................................................5 NGC.......................................................................................................................................5 PREVIOUS -
EEA Conf Programme 2021
Conference Programme - Provisional - 29 March 2021 WEDNESDAY, 30 JUNE 2021 8.30am REGISTRATION & TRADE EXHIBITION OPENS ROOM 3 ROOM 4 ROOMS 2 TO 4 9.30am CONFERENCE OPENING 9.35am Keynote Address 1 10.10am Keynote Address 2 10.45am ROOM 1 ROOM 2 ROOM 3 ROOM 4 CARBON ZERO SMART TECHNOLOGY FUTURE GRIDS PANEL SESSION 1 11.00am Architecture of the Future Low-Carbon, ConductorDown – A groundbreaking safety solution for New approaches to network planning. Details to be advised Resilient, Electrical Power System. overhead distribution networks. Richard Kingsford, WEL Networks Prof. Neville Watson, University of Rodger Griffiths, Electronet Technology Canterbury 11.30am Perverse incentives creating an impact on Practical experience of IEC61850 and future IoT for a smarter grid. network performance and New Zealand’s zero applications. Max Feickert, Energy Outcomes & Darren carbon future. Nathan Rich, Connetics Ltd Lucinsky, Electra Ltd Dougal McQueen & Junaid Qureshi, Aurora Energy 12.00pm The effects on the wider electricity network of Enhancing rating studies through soil digital twin. The use, development and improvement of heating decarbonisation projects. Nu’man Rashid, Unison Networks Ltd approaches for generation balancing to meet peak Campbell Rae, Connetics Ltd demand. Katherine Moore, Transpower NZ Ltd 12.30pm LUNCH ASSET MANAGEMENT INNOVATION FUTURE ENERGY SECURITY INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY SMART TECHNOLOGY 1.30pm Rethinking test data and reporting. An Electricity network infrastructure resilience through the Implementation of Whangamata’s -
RETAIL BOND Investor Presentation
RETAIL BOND Investor Presentation VECTOR May 2019 1 DISCLAIMER This presentation has been prepared by Vector Limited (“Vector”) in relation to the offer of unsecured, unsubordinated fixed rate bonds described in this presentation (“Bonds”). Vector has lodged a Product Disclosure Statement dated 1 May 2019 (“PDS”) with the Registrar of Financial Service Providers in New Zealand (“Registrar”) and made available the information on the register of offers of financial products administered by the Registrar (“Register Entry”) (the PDS and the Register Entry, together the “Offer Materials’) in respect of the offer of Bonds (“Offer”). The Offer Materials should be read before any investment decision is made. A copy of the PDS is available through www.companiesoffice.govt.nz/disclose (OFR 12633) or by contacting the Joint Lead Managers (defined below). This presentation does not constitute a recommendation by Vector or ANZ Bank New Zealand Limited, Deutsche Craigs Limited, Forsyth Barr Limited and Westpac Banking Corporation (ABN 33 007 457 141) (acting through its New Zealand Branch), (together, the “Joint Lead Managers”), or Craigs Investment Partners Limited acting as Organising Participant (together with the Joint Lead Managers, the “Syndicate”) nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents to sell, purchase or retain the Bonds. None of the Syndicate nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees and agents: (a) accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any loss arising from this presentation or -
Annual Report 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Contact 2013
here Annual Report 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Contact 2013 ...is where we do our best work. CONTENTS Contact 2013 At Contact… We keep the lights burning, We are one of New Zealand’s largest listed companies but we operate with the same genuine concern for our the hot water flowing and the customers and communities as the smallest. We are BBQ fired up for around 566,000 integral to our customers’ lives – and our customers customers across the country. are integral to us. OUR BEST WORK 4 CASE STUDIES 30 CONTACT AT A GLANCE 12 HOW WE OPERATE 40 OUR BUSINESS MODEL 14 GOVERNANCE 56 WHERE WE OPERATE 16 REMUNERATION REPORT 62 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 18 STATUTORY DISCLOSURES 65 CHAIRMAN & CEO’S REVIEW 20 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 69 OUR BOARD 26 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 99 OUR LEADERSHIP TEAM 28 CORPORATE DIRECTORY 100 This Annual Report is dated 5 September 2013 and is signed on behalf of the Board by: Grant King Sue Sheldon Follow us at facebook.com/contactenergy Chairman Director OUR BEST WORK Contact 2013 “The kids think there’s always money on the card – they think nothing of a 30 minute shower.” Contact customer research Everyone in the family has unique habits when it comes to energy use. That can make it tough for households to manage their energy costs. We’ve created an easy-to-use online tool, called HEAT, to help our customers manage their energy and identify practical ways to save money on their energy bills. 4 Contact Energy LIMITED Annual Report 2013 Contact Energy LIMITED Annual Report 2013 5 OUR BEST WORK Contact 2013 “I’ll come home on a sunny day and she’ll have the dryer on for half an hour to do her bra and knickers.” Contact customer research Household energy costs vary from month to month as energy use fluctuates. -
Laura Ogorman CV Short Form&Nbsp;
Laura O'Gorman B a r r i s t e r , B a n k s i d e C h a m b e r s e: [email protected] p: 09-200 1501 w: logorman.com O V E R V I E W Barrister with over 23 years of legal experience in a broad range of commercial litigation. Leading Lawyer SPECIALIST AREAS Skills recognised by directory rankings Lender and Insolvency Highly experienced Judicial review and statutory appeals Over 23 years of Contract and company law disputes experience with broad Problem solver expertise Conflict of laws (private international law) Innovative, efficient, tenacious IP and media Intellectual Competition and fair trading LLM from Cambridge, Land law enjoys complex and Commercial challenging matters Pragmatic, BCom in See website for details. accounting and finance Integrity Committed to professional values S E L E C T H I G H L I G H T S Zespri Group Limited v Gao [2020] NZHC 109 (HC) Milk New Zealand (Shanghai) Co Ltd v Miraka Limited [2019] NZHC 2713; [2020] NZHC 697 (HC) Vector Limited v The Electricity Authority [2019] 3 NZLR 19; [2019] NZAR 60 (CA) Sky Network Television Ltd v My Box NZ Ltd (2018) 136 IPR 341 (HC) Cargill International S.A. v Solid Energy New Zealand Ltd [2016] NZHC 1817 (HC) Planet Kids Limited v Auckland Council [2014] 1 NZLR 149; (2013) 14 NZCPR 694 (SC) Fortes v Bank of New Zealand [2014] NZCA 346 (CA) Turners & Growers Ltd v Zespri Group Ltd (2011) 13 TCLR 286 (HC) New Zealand Bus Ltd v Commerce Commission [2008] 3 NZLR 433 (CA) W O R K E X P E R I E N C E E D U C A T I O N BANKSIDE CHAMBERS 1999 MASTER'S DEGREE Barrister sole, from -
Genesis Energy
NEW ZEALAND Genesis Energy 13 June 2008 Performance evaluation Genesis Energy equity valuation Macquarie Research’s discounted cashflow based equity valuation for Genesis Energy is $2,115m (nominal WACC 9.17%, asset beta 0.60, TGR 3.0%). Forecast financial model A detailed financial model with explicit forecasts out to 2030 has been completed and is summarised through this report. 12 month and 24 month target valuations Our 12 month ($2,257m) and 24 month ($2,433m) target valuations for the company have been derived by rolling forward the discounted cashflow model 12 and 24 months respectively and deducting from these values the forecast 12 and 24 month dividends to the Crown. Financial model assumptions and commentary We have assessed the sensitivity of our equity valuation to a wide range of inputs. Broadly, these sensitivities are divided into five categories: generation Inside assumptions, electricity supply, gas supply, financials and price path. Performance evaluation report 2 This report highlights and discusses a number of key model input assumptions: Valuation summary 5 ⇒ The extent to which Huntly coal is backed off; Financial model assumptions and ⇒ The company’s retail and SME pricing position; commentary 11 ⇒ Future fuel cost position; Financial statements summary 18 ⇒ Genesis Energy Retail Gas margins; and Genesis Energy historic and forecast performance 21 ⇒ Wholesale electricity price paths. Historic and forecast performance versus SCI Financial flexibility and generation development 22 We have analysed the spread between Genesis Energy’s return on funds and its WACC to gauge its historic and forecast financial performance; Alternative valuation methodologies 23 We have compared our forecasts for Genesis Energy against those outlined in its Statement of Corporate Intent (SCI). -
Confidential Version
Public Version ISSN No. 0114-2720 11711/900832 Decision No. 682 Determination pursuant to the Electricity Industry Reform Act 1998 (EIR Act) in the matter of an application for exemption, of a prohibited involvement in an electricity lines business and an electricity generation and sales business, from the application of the EIR Act. The application is made by: MARK TUME The Commission: M N Berry P J M Taylor Summary of Application: Application by Mark Tume for exemption from the application of the EIR Act in respect of certain prohibited involvements in Powerco Limited’s lines and in the generation and sale of electricity by TrustPower Limited. Determination: The Commission, pursuant to section 81 of the EIR Act, determines to grant an exemption from compliance with section 17(2)(a) of the EIR Act, but with the conditions specified in the Notice of Exemption. Date of Determination: 10 November 2009 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL IN THIS REPORT IS CONTAINED IN SQUARE BRACKETS 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................3 COMMISSION PROCEDURES...................................................................................3 General.......................................................................................................................3 Criteria Used by the Commission to Consider Exemption Applications ..................3 PARTIES .......................................................................................................................5 -
Notice of Special Meeting Vector Limited
PLEASE READ Notice of Special Meeting Vector Limited Notice is given that a special meeting of the shareholders of Vector Limited will be held in the Guineas Ballroom, Ellerslie Event Centre, Ellerslie Racecourse, 80 Ascot Avenue, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand, on 16 December 2015, commencing at 11am AGENDA ORDINARY RESOLUTION; TO CONSIDER, AND IF THOUGHT FIT, PASS THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION: To approve the sale by NGC Holdings Limited of all of the shares in Vector Gas Limited to Odysseus Investments Limited under an Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of shares in Vector Gas Limited dated 9 November 2015 between Vector Limited, NGC Holdings Limited, Odysseus Investments Limited and Colonial First State Infrastructure Managers (Australia) Pty Limited as manager and agent for Colonial First State Managed Infrastructure Limited as trustee for the Global Diversified Infrastructure Fund (Active), as required by clause 34.1 of Vector Limited’s constitution. By Order of the Board Diane Green Company Secretary 30 November 2015 ORDINARY RESOLUTIONS: Ordinary resolutions are required to be approved by a simple majority of more than 50% of votes validly cast at the Special Meeting. SHAREHOLDERS ENTITLED TO ATTEND AND VOTE: Pursuant to section 125 of the Companies Act 1993, the Board has determined that, for the purposes of voting at the Special Meeting, only those registered shareholders of the Company as at 5.00pm on 10 December 2015, being a day not more than 20 working days before the meeting, shall be entitled to exercise the right to vote at the meeting. PROXIES: Any person entitled to attend and vote at the meeting may appoint another person as his/her proxy (or representative in the case of a corporate shareholder) to attend and vote instead of him/her. -
A Bold Vision
Creating a new energy future – a bold vision ANNUAL REPORT 2021 Our vision Creating a new energy future – a bold vision isn’t linear. In pursuing our vision over the past few years, we’ve had to be flexible and adaptable. We haven’t been afraid to challenge the status quo. As leaders of the transformation of the energy sector, we know the ‘same old’ just won’t cut it. We have the confidence to forge new solutions and for our people to work differently, to think differently. We have collaborated with global technology companies and thought leaders who share our view that innovation and digitalisation are key to meeting the future needs of energy systems and fast-evolving customer demands. As governments, businesses and consumers urgently take action to decarbonise, at Vector we are clear on our vision – creating a new energy future. It’s bold. 1 VECTOR ANNUAL REPORT 2021 / 2 Creating a new energy future – a bold vision Contents Performance snapshot 4 Chair and Group Chief Executive report 6 Chief Financial Officer report 12 Our people and safety 14 Regulated networks 16 Gas trading 20 Metering 21 Our climate and sustainability 22 Our Board 26 Our management team 28 Governance report 30 Entrust, majority shareholder of Vector 39 Joint ventures and investments 40 Operating statistics 41 Financial performance trends 42 Non-GAAP financial information 44 Financials 45 Independent auditor’s report 90 Statutory information 96 Financial calendar and directory 106 About this report This report, dated 23 August 2021, is a review of Vector’s financial and operational performance for the year ended 30 June 2021. -
Commerce Commission CPP Open Letter July 2018
First Gas Limited 42 Connett Road West, Bell Block 31 July 2018 Private Bag 2020, New Plymouth, 4342 New Zealand P +64 6 755 0861 F +64 6 759 6509 Matthew Lewer Manager, Regulation Development Commerce Commission PO Box 2351 WELLINGTON Sent via email: [email protected] Dear Matthew Feedback on recent CPP processes This is First Gas’ submission on the Commerce Commission’s open letter requesting feedback on recent customised price-quality path (CPP) processes dated 3 July 2018. Summary of key points First Gas welcomes the Commission’s review of recent CPPs. The findings of this work are of interest to us as we consider a CPP application for our gas transmission business to address the risk of coastal erosion near our pipelines at White Cliffs in northern Taranaki. We disagree with the Commission’s view that the principle of proportionate scrutiny is sufficiently defined in the Input Methodologies. We consider that the Wellington Electricity (WELL) CPP process demonstrates the value of considering high-priority, specific resilience issues outside of a full CPP process. This ensures a timely response to identified major resilience risks, without the resource required for a full CPP. Most of the other topics canvassed in the open letter set out activities that we expect any prudent regulated business would undertake prior to submitting a CPP application. These activities require a degree of flexibility to reflect the drivers of the individual CPP applications, so we do not support these being codified into the CPP requirements. We expand on these points below. Importance of consultation on CPP processes and experience to date Industry consultation and feedback on the CPP process is of considerable interest to First Gas, as we are currently considering a CPP application for our White Cliffs realignment project. -
A: Strengthening the Consumer Voice
A: Strengthening the consumer voice A1: Establish a consumer advisory council We support the option to establish a consumer advisory council. However, in order to be effective, this council will need to avoid industry and regulatory capture and will need to maintain a strong focus on consumer, rather than industry, needs. To do this the group will need to be underpinned by strong customer data analytics and evidence and should have a structure which is independent from undue industry or regulatory influence. It should also have strong consumer representation. We agree with the Panel and that setting up a Consumer Advisory Council to promote the interests of residential and small business consumers is a positive step to help overcome the complexity of the electricity sector and to give consumers a voice in decision-making. However, as noted by the Panel, the complexity of the electricity sector can make it difficult for consumers to engage with industry and regulatory decision making. There is therefore a risk that the proposed Council may simply rely on the views of external consultants to inform their positions and decision making, which could lead to industry and/or regulatory capture of the Council. Appointing a regulator to act as Secretariat would also raise similar concerns. A number of the options put forward in the Paper signal that the EA has not adequately accounted for consumer interests in its approach. For example, the proposed Government Policy Statement (GPS) on transmission pricing highlights the limitations of a narrow focus on pure economic efficiency at the expense of consumer experience – the impact of price shocks on consumers, and particularly those experiencing energy hardship, has been raised with some concern by the Panel. -
2010 Default Price-Quality Path Compliance Assessment Decision
COMMERCE COMMISSION Regulation of Electricity Lines Businesses Price-Quality Regulation Reasons for Not Declaring Control of the following Non-exempt Electricity Distribution Businesses: Alpine Energy Limited, Centralines Limited, Eastland Network Limited, Horizon Energy Distribution Limited, Nelson Electricity Limited, Network Tasman Limited, Orion New Zealand Limited, OtagoNet Joint Venture, Powerco Limited, The Lines Company Limited, Top Energy Limited and Wellington Electricity Lines Limited 1 April 2011 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................. 3 Electricity Distribution Businesses Assessed ................................................... 3 Statutory Framework ......................................................................................... 4 Consumer-owned .................................................................................................................. 4 Process and Analytical Framework Applied ................................................... 5 Overview of the 2009/10 Assessment ................................................................ 6 Breaches of the Price Path ................................................................................................... 6 Breaches of the Quality Threshold ..................................................................................... 11 DECISIONS –