DOCSLIB.ORG

Burkina Faso: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Annual Progress Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burkina Faso: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Annual Progress Report © 2006 International Monetary Fund October 2006 IMF Country Report No. 06/357 Burkina Faso: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Annual Progress Report Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) are prepared by member countries in broad consultation with stakeholders and development partners, including the staffs of the World Bank and the IMF. Updated every three years with annual progress reports, they describe the country’s macroeconomic, structural, and social policies in support of growth and poverty reduction, as well as associated external financing needs and major sources of financing. This country document for Burkina Faso, dated May 2005, is being made available on the IMF website by agreement with the member country as a service to users of the IMF website. To assist the IMF in evaluating the publication policy, reader comments are invited and may be sent by e-mail to [email protected]. Copies of this report are available to the public from International Monetary Fund • Publication Services 700 19th Street, N.W. • Washington, D.C. 20431 Telephone: (202) 623-7430 • Telefax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] • Internet: http://www.imf.org Price: $18.00 a copy International Monetary Fund Washington, D.C. BBUURRKKIINNAA FFAASSOO PPOOVVEERRTTYY RREEDDUUCCTTIIOONN SSTTRRAATTEEGGYY PPAAPPEERR Agriculture 100% Health Education 50% 0% BCG DTCP3 VAR VAA 2003 2004 22000044 IIMPLEMENTATION RREPORT FIFTH EDITION 9 Evolution of real GDP 0 1997 2004 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT MAY 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................. vi Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Benchmarks.............................................................................................................................. 3 I. SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES............................ 4 1.1. Strategic goals .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Major quantitative objectives......................................................................................... 4 1.3. National priorities .............................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1. Education........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.2. Health .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.3. HIV/AIDS prevention and control ................................................................................ 5 1.3.4. Drinking water ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3.5. Rural development........................................................................................................6 1.3.6. Environmental and living conditions........................................................................... 7 1.3.7. Efforts to fight a lack of security................................................................................... 7 1.3.8. SME/SMIs and small-scale mining................................................................................ 7 1.3.9. Capacity building and promotion of NICTs............................................................... 7 1.4. Strategic themes............................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1. Growth and equity ........................................................................................................8 1.4.2. Access of the poor to basic social services and social welfare ............................. 8 1.4.3. Equitable expansion of job and other income-generating opportunities for the poor ………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 1.4.4. Promotion of good governance ................................................................................. 9 II. PRSP IMPLEMENTATION STATUS .......................................................................................... 9 2.1. PRSP overview and financing ......................................................................................... 9 2.1.1. Summary of projected financial framework.............................................................. 9 2.1.2. Status of resource mobilization .................................................................................. 11 2.1.2.1. Evolution of government resources ............................................................... 11 2.1.2.2. Specific status of HIPC resources and budgetary support ......................... 11 2.1.3. Status of public expenditure ...................................................................................... 12 2.1.3.1. Evolution of public expenditure...................................................................... 12 2.1.3.2. Specific status of HIPC resource execution in 2004 ..................................... 13 2.1.3.3. Sector appropriations ...................................................................................... 14 2.2. Analysis of results by strategic theme .......................................................................... 15 2.2.1. Overview of PAP implementation............................................................................. 15 2.2.1.1. Focal points of the PAP.................................................................................... 15 2.2.1.2. PAP implementation status ............................................................................. 15 2.2.2. Analysis of results by theme........................................................................................ 18 2.2.2.1. Growth and equity ........................................................................................... 18 2.2.2.1.1. Stability of the macroeconomic framework.......................................... 18 2.2.2.1.2. Status of convergence ............................................................................. 22 2.2.2.1.3. Competitiveness of the economy .......................................................... 23 2.2.2.1.4. Support for productive sectors ................................................................ 38 2.2.2.2. Basic social services and social protection .................................................. 40 2.2.2.2.1. Education ................................................................................................... 40 2.2.2.2.2. Health .......................................................................................................... 50 2.2.2.2.3. Combating HIV/AIDS ................................................................................ 60 2.2.2.2.4. Safe drinking water and sanitation ......................................................... 67 2.2.2.2.5. Living conditions ........................................................................................ 68 2.2.2.6. Social protections and women’s issues......................................................... 70 2.2.2.3. Employment opportunities and income-generating activities .................. 73 2.2.2.3.1. Agricultural sub-sector: expansion of plant production ...................... 74 2.2.2.3.2. Water sub-sector........................................................................................ 79 2.2.2.3.3. Animal resources sub-sector .................................................................... 80 2.2.2.3.4. Fisheries sub-sector .................................................................................... 88 2.2.2.3.5. Forestry and wildlife resource sub-sector ............................................... 89 2.2.2.3.6. Environmental sub-sector ......................................................................... 90 2.2.2.3.7. Capacity-building ..................................................................................... 92 2.2.2.3.8. Institutional reform in the rural sector...................................................... 92 2.2.2.3.9. Increase and diversification of rural incomes: improved credit access ...................................................................................................................................... 93 2.2.2.3.10. Employment and professional training................................................. 96 2.2.2.3.11. Improving accessibility............................................................................ 98 2.2.2.4. Promotion of good governance .................................................................. 102 2.2.2.4.1. Political governance............................................................................... 102 2.2.2.4.2. Administrative governance ................................................................... 109 2.2.2.4.3. Economic governance........................................................................... 110 2.2.2.4.4. Local governance................................................................................... 114 2.2.2.4.5. Capacity-building and promotion of NICTs......................................... 115 2.3. Monitoring/evaluation strategy.................................................................................. 116 2.3.1. Institutional mechanism ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burkina Faso
    BURKINA FASO Situation des personnes déplacées internes (PDI) A la date du 10 juillet 2019 APERÇU Nombre total de PDI Localisation PDI par commune 13 régions Nombre de PDI 219 756 < 1 000 Capitale 1 000 - 10 000 Frontière internationale Comparaison avec provinces SAHEL 11 mai 2019 34 10 001 - 30 000 Limite de région * 30 001 - 60 000 Limite de province Deou +29% 89 communes > 60 000 Limite de commune Koutougou Oudalan Nassoumbou Gorom-Gorom *L’augmentation des chires de déplacement résulte en grande partie de l’amélioration du Diguel processus d’enregistrement ayant permis d’enrôler plusieurs personnes déjà en situation de Djibo Soum Banh Solle Baraboule Arbinda déplacement. Tongomayel Dori MALI Kain Loroum Gorgadji Pobé-Mangao Seno Evolution de la situation des PDI Kelbo NIGER 220K Thiou Titao Bourzanga PensaBouroum Yatenga Dablo 171K Rollo Bam Nagbingou 161K Ouahigouya Zimtenga Barsalogho Yalgo 136K NORD KongoussiNamissigma NassereCENTRE-NORD 101K Tikare 82K Rambo Sabce Sanmatenga Tougouri Kalsaka Kaya Pissila 40K 41K 47K Mane 28K 28K 38K Namentenga 9K 12K 13K 13K 13K 17K Boulsa janv.-18 avr.-18 juil.-18 oct.-18 janv.-19 avr.-19 juin-19 CENTRE BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN Ouagadougou Yamba PDI par province KadiogoPLATEAU CENTRAL Matiacoali Gourma EST CENTRE-OUEST Fada N'Gourma SAHEL CENTRE-SUD MALI Oudalan Poura Pama Soum NIGER CENTRE-EST Loroum Seno HAUTS-BASSINS Kompienga Bam Yatenga CENTRE-NORD NORD Namentenga Sanmatenga CENTRE BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN Ouagadougou Kadiogo PLATEAU CENTRAL Gourma EST SUD-OUEST BENIN Bale CENTRE-OUEST CASCADES CENTRE-SUD CENTRE-EST Kompienga HAUTS-BASSINS GHANA CASCADES BENIN SUD-OUEST GHANA TOGO TOGO COTE D’IVOIRE COTE D’IVOIRE Les désignations et les limites administratives utilisées sur ce produit n'impliquent pas une reconnaissance officielle par l'Organisation des Nations Unies.
    [Show full text]
  • BURKINA FASO Staple Food and Livestock Market Fundamentals 2017
    FEWS NET BURKINA FASO Staple Food and Livestock Market Fundamentals 2017 BURKINA FASO STAPLE FOOD AND LIVESTOCK MARKET FUNDAMENTALS SEPTEMBER 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. for the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), contract number AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The Famine Early Warning Systems Network i authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. FEWS NET BURKINA FASO Staple Food and Livestock Market Fundamentals 2017 About FEWS NET Created in response to the 1984 famines in East and West Africa, the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) provides early warning and integrated, forward-looking analysis of the many factors that contribute to food insecurity. FEWS NET aims to inform decision makers and contribute to their emergency response planning; support partners in conducting early warning analysis and forecasting; and provide technical assistance to partner-led initiatives. To learn more about the FEWS NET project, please visit www.fews.net. Disclaimer This publication was prepared under the United States Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Indefinite Quantity Contract, AID-OAA-I-12-00006. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. Acknowledgments FEWS NET gratefully acknowledges the network of partners in Burkina Faso who contributed their time, analysis, and data to make this report possible.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Food Security in Burkina Faso Fews Net Update for January-February, 2001
    The USAID Famine Early Warning System Network (FEWS NET) (Réseau USAID du Système d’Alerte Précoce contre la Famine) 01 BP 1615 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso, West Africa Tel/Fax: 226-31-46-74. Email: [email protected] STATE OF FOOD SECURITY IN BURKINA FASO FEWS NET UPDATE FOR JANUARY-FEBRUARY, 2001 February 25, 2001 HIGHLIGHTS Food insecurity continues to worsen in the center plateau, north, and Sahel regions, prompting the government to call for distributions and subsidized sales of food between February and August in food insecure areas. Basic food commodities remained available throughout the country in February. Millet, the key food staple, showed no price movements that would suggest unusual scarcities in the main markets compared to prices in February 2000 or average February prices. Nevertheless, millet prices rose 40-85 % above prices a year ago in secondary markets in the north and Sahel regions, respectively. These sharp price rises stem from the drop in cereal production in October-November following the abrupt end of the rains in mid-August. Unfortunately, the lack of good roads reduces trader incentives to supply cereals to those areas. Consequently, prices have been increasing quickly due to increasing demand from households that did not harvest enough. Throughout the north and Sahel regions, most households generally depend on the livestock as their main source of income. Ironically this year, when millet prices are rising, most animal prices have fallen drastically due to severe shortages of water and forage. To make matters worse, animal exports to Ivory Coast, which used to be a very profitable business, are no longer a viable option following the ethnic violence that erupted in that country a few months ago.
    [Show full text]
  • “By Day We Fear the Army, by Night the Jihadists” Abuses by Armed Islamists and Security Forces in Burkina Faso
    HUMAN “By Day We Fear the Army, RIGHTS By Night the Jihadists” WATCH Abuses by Armed Islamists and Security Forces in Burkina Faso “By Day We Fear the Army, By Night the Jihadists” Abuses by Armed Islamists and Security Forces in Burkina Faso Copyright © 2018 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36055 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org MAY 2018 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36055 “By Day We Fear the Army, By Night the Jihadists” Abuses by Armed Islamists and Security Forces in Burkina Faso Map .................................................................................................................................... i Summary ........................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Burkina Faso • Hans Bruyninckx
    HansThe Convention Bruyninckx to Combat Desertiªcation The Convention to Combat Desertiªcation and the Role of Innovative Policy-Making Discourses: The Case of Burkina Faso • Hans Bruyninckx The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertiªcation (from now on referred to as the Desertiªcation Convention or abbreviated as CCD) was adopted in 1994 and entered into force in December 1996. Its aim is to combat desertiªcation, i.e. soil degradation,1 in a number of speciªed regions.2 To date (2004), 191 countries are members to the convention. In order to achieve its aim, the CCD uses the traditional institutional arrangements, instruments and mechanisms, which we ªnd in many international agreements and regimes.3 Af- ter several years of negotiations, states set up an international institutional framework, including a decision-making body, the Conference of the Parties (COP), a permanent regime secretariat, and a number of committees, which fol- low-up the activities and prepare future COPs. In addition, a compliance and sanctioning mechanism is speciªed. A Committee on Science and Technology ensures also a serious input from scientists in the operation of the regime.4 Typical for the functioning of international environmental regimes and policy-making is also that the goals and principles included in the CCD are determined at the level of the COP and then translated into practice at the na- tional policy level (National Action Plans in the case of the CCD) and, spe- ciªcally for the CCD also at the regional level (Regional Action Plans). This re- gional level forms a key strategic planning and operational level for the convention.
    [Show full text]
  • BURKINA FASO - Reference Map
    BURKINA FASO - Reference Map Legend !\ Capital of State H! Capital of region Tin !. Akoff ! Capital of province ! o Capital of Commune International Airport Oursi ! Markoye p Secondary Airport ! ! Deou Asphalted national road Koutougou ! K Gorom Non asphalted national road N U Gorom !Diguel Regional road Nassoumbou !. ! Other road/track Falagountou ! Railway M a l i Aribinda Baraboule ! River ! Sahel Sole ! Djibo River !. Tongomayel !Banh Ka I-n ! ! Dori Landcover ! H! Gorgadji ! Cities Pobe Seytenga Mengao N i g e r ! Bare rock Kelbo Koumbri ! ! Sandy desert and dunes !Thiou !Barga ! Stony desert !. Titao ! Titabe Dablo ! ! Bani Croplands (>50%) Ouindigui Bourzanga Sampelga Nord ! ! Croplands with open woody vegetation !Pensa Narbingou Rollo ! Ouahigouya ! ! ! Yalgo! Irrigated croplands Namissiguima Bouroum TangayeH! ! ! Sparse grassland !Namissiguima Tankougounadie !Gomboro ! Oula Open grassland !Seguenega Sebba Boundore ! ! Barsalogho !. ! Zogore ! !Coala Solhan Kombori Toeni ! Leba Open grassland with sparse shrubs ! ! Kossouka ! Kongoussi Nasre Bassi Closed grassland ! Tikare !. ! Tougouri ! ! UNK Deciduous shrubland with sparse trees Lankoue Rambo ! ! ! ! Mani A G A Kiembara F Gourcy Rouko ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Deciduous woodland Centre-Nord ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tougo ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Varietal Selection with Improved Pearl Millet in West Africa
    Expl Agric. (2007), volume 43, pp. 5–19 C 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0014479706004248 Printed in the United Kingdom PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTION WITH IMPROVED PEARL MILLET IN WEST AFRICA By G. O. OMANYA†, E. WELTZIEN-RATTUNDE‡, D. SOGODOGO§, M. SANOGO§, N. HANSSENS¶,Y.GUERO†† and R. ZANGRE‡‡ International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) Sahelian Center, B.P.12404, Niamey, Niger, ‡ICRISAT, B.P.320, Bamako, Mali, §Institut d’Economie Rurale, SRA Cinzana, B.P.214,Cinzana, Mali, ¶Winrock International-Mali, B.P.E 457, Bamako, Mali, ††Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger, B.P.429, Niamey, Niger and ‡‡Institut National de l’Environment et Recherche Agricole, B.P.037192 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso (Accepted 15 May 2006) SUMMARY A reconnaissance survey and participatory varietal selection trials (PVS) were conducted in four major pearl millet-growing countries of the Sahel between 2001 and 2003. The studies aimed to identify farmers’ preferences in improved pearl millet varieties, increase awareness, test new varieties and enhance farmers’ access to the improved varieties. Farmers selected five out of 10 tested varieties, with preferred characteristics, namely, maturity cycles of 80–90 d in the Sahel and 90–100 d in the Sudanian agro- ecozones, acceptable grain yield, compact and long (30–100 cm) panicles, a large number of tillers with panicles, adaptation and an acceptable taste. Farmers indicated that their local varieties were of superior adaptation and taste. They mentioned that hindrances to uptake and sustained use of improved varieties were due to lack of awareness, traditional values, seed unavailability, early maturity, bird damage and lack of fertilizer.
    [Show full text]
  • Burkina Faso
    COUNTRY OPERATION UPDATE MAY 2019 Burkina Faso Barsalogho IDP site © UNHCR / Romain Desclous POPULATION OF CONCERN FUNDING (AS OF MAY 2019) 200,384 USD 30,3 Million IDPs (***) 170 447 needed for the Burkina Faso Country Operation Refugees and asylum 453 seekers other nationalities… New arrivals (**) 4 313 25% Funded Malian refugees (*) 25 171 75% Funding 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 gap * UNHCR figures (30 April 2019) ** Government of Burkina Faso figures (April 2018) *** OCHA figures (19 May 2019) KEY INDICATORS 15,000 Estimation of number of Burkinabe citizens who have looked for safety in neighboring countries 22,000 Number of birth certificates UNHCR helped to deliver to IDPs and host communities 170,447 people forced to flee their homes who have remained in Burkina Faso Malian refugee women showing her vegetable garden, Mentao refugee www.unhcr.org camp, Sahel Region © UNHCR / Ilyas AG MALICK 1 ** COUNTRY OPERATION UPDATE Burkina Faso / May 2019 Operational Context The key situations include: 1. The Mali Situation began in 2012 with the outbreak of conflict in northern Mali. Today, almost 25,000 Malians have found refuge in Burkina Faso and were biometrically registered by UNHCR. Since the beginning of the year, 731 new individuals have been added to UNHCR’s database. The Sahel region, bordering Mali and Niger and hosting 98% of Malian refugees, has been increasingly affected by insecurity and violence, aggravating the vulnerability of people who need care and want to build a better future. This increases the risk of secondary movements. Since over one year, thousands of asylum seekers from Mali have continued to enter into Boucle du Mouhoun and Nord regions, fleeing an intensification of violence in Central Mali.
    [Show full text]
  • BURKINA FASO - Carte De Référence De La Région Du Nord a La Date Du 07 Juillet 2020
    BURKINA FASO - Carte de référence de la région du Nord A la date du 07 juillet 2020 2°0'W Diguel Nassoumbou Diendie Tadiegnegui Dara Boulol Karawal Gourbiri MALI Diem Bani Gourbiri Ogou Monbe Bani Gasenay Peroumou Meiti Senoideve Fetendaneva Gouife Gaselgalawa Tafay Bene Banh Kaidare Zamne Nassouwele Meiti Peulh Peten Nangue Nasinguiri Karga Bourey Namague Yante Digna Dina Fafati Sole Baraboule Moguel Dabe Solle Sorogo Limbere Djibo MossiSegue Yamboumbou Kansende Bidi Som Didiel Segue Kourmire Madougou Dakeoule Selou Kokoli Dambatao Djibo Guerou Tibo Petebone Daibara Boureta Dere Ibere Delga Yongono Senodieo Boroni SOUM SAHEL Banh Yeregue Sembere Segoum Ogoro Beguemtigue Borio Nimbarou Orelbalinguel Komtaka Loisit Tanga Ka I-n Dore Sale Koule Madougou Sobatanga Sembere Natiate Diaret Selougou Desse Tanpelaga Chanboulga Bire Kosoro Sale Koule Tiofinom Sounamlaka Diay Selga Bogotombo Feto Nay Tenel Baouene Vapele Dora Lossa Yensi Sey 14°0'N Mougounougaboko Tongomayel 14°0'N Zaye Kain Desse Kosso LOROUM Amene Fogoulde Poussougaboko Posso Weknaore Andekanda Tineguene Dandambara Kenema Ingane Petelnangue Bidibawoye Donombene Bongola Bore Samene Derpon Tou Keke Tangabangoa Yense Zougouma Loroum Senobani Bidi Podebokou Pobe-Mangao Wagara Gourouga Ninigue Toulfe Ingare Goussirite Diguia Koumbri Pela Dinguela Titao Doubare Solobo Mene Ouro Kalembago Petoissire Yalaga Koumbri Nogo Iliwatena Watinoma Songotaba Babo PoguiaNimbo Arbete Zome Illigue Nomo Tebela Boulzoma Sanga Yarse Thiou Derfogo Golonga Kombouri Benh Loy Sim Sobono Barga Rimassa Tibitenga
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Lines of Stone: the Social Impact of a Soil and Water
    Behind the Lines of Stone The Social Impact of a Soil and Water Conservation Project in the Sahel Nicholas Atampugre Oxfam UK and Ireland © Oxfam (UK and Ireland) 1993 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Front-cover photograph by Jeremy Hartley ISBN 0 85598 257 8 (hardback) ISBN 0 85598 258 6 (paperback) Published by Oxfam (UK and Ireland) 274 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DZ (Oxfam is registered as a charity No. 202918) Designed and typeset by Oxfam Design Department NY285/PK/93 Printed by Oxfam Print Unit Typeset in Melior 10/12pt Cover PMS 172 & 329 Printed on environment-friendly paper This book converted to digital file in 2010 Contents List of tables v List of figures vi Contributors viii Acknowledgements ix Abbreviations and a note on currency x Introduction xi Burkina Faso xi Projet Agro-Forestier xiv The 1992 evaluation xv The book xix 1 Yatenga: a battle for survival 1 Population and environment 2 The farming system 9 Water resources 11 Seasonally 12 Socio-economic infrastructure 15 Migration from Yatenga 22 Comment: the challenge facing NGOs 24 2 External agency intervention in Yatenga 25 Learning from the past 26 Recent NGO involvement 27 PAF: the early years 34 Comment: some lessons from the early years 46 3 The scope of PAF today 53 Objectives and priorities 53 Areas of activity 57 Geographical zones of intervention 64 Comment: competition or co-operation? 66 4 Laying the foundations of development 72 The impact of diguettes 72 PAF's role in diguette construction 84 Beyond diguettes: PAF's complementary
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Des Pdis 24112020
    BURKINA FASO Situation des personnes déplacées internes (PDI) 10 novembre 2020 Evolution de la situation des PDI APERÇU 1.03M 1.05M 979k 848k régions 1 049 767 13 614k Comparaison avec provinces 486k 08 septembre 2020 45 238k 161k +1,5% 258 communes 82k Jan'19 Avr'19 Jul'19 Oct'19 Jan'20 Avr'20 Jul'20 Sep'20 Nov'20 PDI par région PDI par province Oudalan Soum S A H E L Séno Loroum Yatenga Namentenga N O R D Bam Yagha Sourou Sanmatenga C E N T R E Zondoma N O R D Kossi Passoré Gnagna Komandjari Nayala Kourwéogo B O U C L E D U Oubritenga Sanguié M O U H O U N P L A T E A U Kadiogo Ganzourgou Banwa Boulkiemdé C E N T R E C E N T R A L Mouhoun Kourittenga E S T Gourma Tapoa Bazèga Balé Ziro Boulgou C E N T R E Kénédougou Zoundwéogo O U E S T C E N T R E Tuy Koulpélogo Kompienga H A U T S C E N T R E E S T Houet Sissili Nahouri B A S S I N S S U D Ioba Bougouriba Léraba Nombre de PDI Nombre de PDI S U D 0 0 C A S C A D E S O U E S T Capitale Comoé Poni Capitale 1-15 000 Frontière internationale 1-10 000 Frontière internationale 15 001 - 50 000 10 001 - 50 000 Limite de région Limite de région 50 001 - 100 000 Noumbiel 50 001 - 100 000 Limite de province 100 001 - 300 000 100 001 - 150 000 > 300 000 > 150 000 PDI par commune Déou Nombre de PDI Markoye 0 Capitale 1-1 000 Frontière internationale Gorom-Gorom 1 001 - 10 000 Falagountou Limite de région 10 001 - 50 000 Arbinda Limite de commune Bahn Djibo 50 001 - 100 000 Sollé Kaïn Gorgadji Dori > 100 000 Seytenga Titao Kelbo Pensa Sampelga Thiou Ouindigui Bourzanga Bani Namissiguima Dablo Bouroum
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Entrepreneurship in the Sahel: Burkina Faso Catalystas
    Report on Entrepreneurship in the Sahel: Burkina Faso Catalystas Commissioned by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency RVO Scoping Mission Report on Entrepreneurship in the Sahel: Burkina Faso The following report has been drafted by Catalystas Consulting, an intersectional feminist international development consulting firm, to provide insight into youth (ages 18-35) entrepreneurship opportunities, activities, stakeholders, and opportunities for improvement in Burkina Faso. This report is based on a two-week field mission undertaken by Catalystas Consulting in June 2019, as part of a broader mission to provide an accurate picture of youth employment and entrepreneurship needs and opportunities in Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso. The aim of this mission is to furnish a report for the Dutch government detailing how to support and upscale existing structures and/or initiatives that have already been set up by other local or international actors. A full overview of our research methodology pertaining to this report is available as Appendix H: Methodologies for Entrepreneurship Research and Reports. We have paid particular attention to young women in business, agricultural productivity, and value-chains. Our objective in undertaking this country-specific entrepreneurial assessment and writing this report is to highlight programs and initiatives that could be extended to the secondary cities of Banfora, Dori and Ouahigouya, which are among the target areas in Burkina Faso in the Dutch policy agenda. The following information consists of a report and four appendices that we believe sufficiently inform policy makers and ambassadorial staff of the multiple opportunities and challenges that must be taken into consideration for effective intervention in the Malian entrepreneurial context.
    [Show full text]