Law and Policy and Its Impact on Kenya's Indigenous Communities' Land Rights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Law and Policy and Its Impact on Kenya's Indigenous Communities' Land Rights LAW AND ITS IMPACT ON KENYA’S INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES’ LAND RIGHTS: THE OPPORTUNITIES Connie N. Maina Sozi Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London. October 2019 Law and its Impact on Kenya’s Indigenous Communities’ Land Rights: The Opportunities Connie N. Maina Sozi Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London. October 2019 1 Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my own independent investigation except where I have indicated my indebtedness to other sources. This dissertation has not already been accepted in substance for any other degree, and is not being submitted concurrently in candidature for any other degree. Signed Connie N. Maina Sozi (Candidate) 2 Abstract: For those communities in Kenya that identify as indigenous, and with the indigenous movement, land is the core of their collective existence. To remove them from their ancestral lands violates their customary rights to land and says to them that they do not matter. For years they have been the victims of those in power who have used their political influence as well as the law to denigrate and invalidate those rights. This has been through forced assimilation of these communities into larger groups, forced evictions, damaging of property, killings, inhuman and degrading treatment; and broken promises. Judgments of regional bodies under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights framework affirming those rights have gone unimplemented. This thesis therefore looks at what law has been, what it is and what it could do with a particular focus on the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and its harbinger- on land- the National Land Policy 2009. Alternatives existing under the East African Community Treaty and also the World Bank’s framework on indigenous communities, -are also examined. The conclusion reached is that land in Kenya is a political chalice, howbeit, progressive law has been enacted. This must have an intended purpose, and where that purpose is not fulfilled, law may as well not exist. There is opportunity in the law for both communities and law makers to close in on this disparateness and bring out the realisation of these land rights. 3 Acknowledgments There have been a number of entities and people without whom this thesis would not have been possible. First is my College, the Institute of Commonwealth Studies for awarding me the Louise Arbour Scholarship to conduct this thesis. Second, the late Professor Patrick McAuslan, my LLM lecturer at Birkbeck College who through discussion during the Globalisation of Land Markets module highlighted the plight of the Endorois community and opened up the indigenous land rights’ discourse to me. Third is my mother, Dr Beatrice Maina who through her own PhD endeavour and success at the University of Wales nearly thirty years ago, empathised and encouraged me every single step of the way: thank you mum, I knew I could because you did. Fourth, is my supervisor, Dr Corinne Lennox whose constructive feedback, guidance, understanding and patience has impacted me more than I have ever vocalised to her: thank you Corinne. Fifth, is Catherine Ham, my best friend: thank you mami for seeing me through this. Sixth, my friends who kept asking for an update and encouraged me to persist when the going got tough. And there are those who have contributed to this work by talking to me, thank you and in particular Mr Kiprono Chuma, Ogiek elder at Timboroa, Nakuru: I will not forget your stories. Then to those who have gone before me: Cῦcῦ Teresiah and Cῦcῦ Rhoda, for loving me, always praying for me and believing in me. And lastly to the Lord God Almighty, for sustaining me through this work. 4 Table of Contents Introductory Chapter: ...................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1: A reluctant opportunity? Commissions and Task Forces impacting on indigenous communities’ land rights in Kenya .................................... 47 Chapter 2: The 2010 Constitution and Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights ........... 100 Chapter 3: Implementation of the Endorois and Ogiek decisions under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights framework under domestic mechanism ........................................................................................... 138 Chapter 4: The East African Community- An Alternative mechanism for recognition, promotion and protection of indigenous communities’ land rights? . 195 Chapter 5: Impact of International development funding on indigenous communities’ land rights: Case studying the IDA funded Natural Resource Management Project ......................................................... 255 Concluding Chapter: ................................................................................................. 303 Appendix: list of interviewees .................................................................................. 312 Tables of Cases ......................................................................................................... 313 Tables of Legislation ................................................................................................. 317 Tables of Treaties and International Instruments ..................................................... 319 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 321 5 Introductory Chapter ‘Legal focus stems from the reality that the legal treatment of property rights is the ultimate determinant of tenure security.’1 Introduction 1 A discussion on law relating to indigenous communities’ land rights is multifarious and complex in nature. It reeks of a power game in which the players are the Government, its agencies, politicians and funding donors, other citizens and finally the indigenous communities. Whoever has the most power possesses the land or determines what happens to it. Kenya’s land politics has in fact been described as ‘first and foremost a redistributive game that creates winners and losers’.2 Land has been used to gain power in Kenya;3 and law, whether imposed, respected or disregarded has played a pivotal role in that. 2 This thesis observes that land law has evolved from a communal land tenure- form in the pre-colonial period, where members of communities were allowed to use community land as they wanted as long as this was in line with the customary laws,4 and where the concept of individual or private ownership was unknown,5 to a codified pro-individualised and public-tenure system under the colonial regime. In introducing its systems, the colonial administration imposed measures that were alien to the native population and which ignored their existing and political patterns.6 This affected the Kenyan native population as a whole including indigenous communities and led to 1 Liz Alden Wily, ‘The Community Land Act in Kenya Opportunities and Challenge for Communities’ (MDPI 2018) <https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/1/12> accessed 5 June 2018. 2 Catherine Boone, ‘Land Conflicts and Distributive Politics in Kenya’ (2012) Volume 55 Number 1 African Studies Review 75. 3 Cyprian Fisiy puts it more aptly: ‘Control over land has served as an important component of control over people’, cited in Catherine Boone, Property and Political Order in Africa: Land Rights and the Structure of Politics (Cambridge University Press 2014). 4 Walter Odhiambo and Hezron Nyangito, Land Laws and Land Use in Kenya: Implications for Agricultural Development (Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis, 2002). 5 Peter Ng’ang’a Mburu, ‘Strategies to Modernize the Land Registration System in Kenya’ (DPhil Thesis University of Groningen 2017). 6 Patrick Thornberry, Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights (Manchester University Press 2002) 211. 6 mass disinheritance of individuals and communities of their land, inequitable access to land and contributed to land tenure insecurity particularly for indigenous peoples.7 The post-colonial era has seen perpetuation of the colonial system by Governments which have been run by individuals from dominant communities, much larger and more powerful than indigenous communities. 3 The communities that these individuals belong to have chosen to follow the individual rather than collective system of land ownership, partly as this has aligned with the agenda of donors, until now. The law in its current form, as introduced by the 2009 National Land Policy (NLP) and established by the 2010 Constitution, is a departure from the law as it was and re-introduces communal land tenure as a valid land regime. This is referred to as community land under the Constitution and is the category of land which enshrines indigenous communities’ land rights. The language used in both the NLP and the Constitution are progressive in the articulation of indigenous communities’ land rights. There is also the Community Land Act 2016; and other constitutionally-inspired laws dating from 2012 to 2016 relating to land, forest-management, natural resources and human rights etc., which have the potential to impact on indigenous communities one way or the other, which are some of the opportunities this thesis will explore. Background 4 Kenya became a British protectorate in 1895. Protectorates were those territories which were not yet fully brought into the dominion of the British Crown but where Britain controlled the external affairs. In
Recommended publications
  • KENYA Natural Resource Management Project Public Disclosure Authorized
    Report No. 88065-KE Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA Natural Resource Management Project Public Disclosure Authorized Investigation Report Public Disclosure Authorized May, 22 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized The Inspection Panel In Memoriam Alf Morten Jerve (1953 – 2014) Acknowledgements The preparation of this Report would not have been possible without the support and valuable contributions of many people. The Panel wishes to thank the Cherangany-Sengwer Requesters and their communities who met with the Panel in the Project area. The Panel expresses its appreciation to the national government officials in Kenya with whom the Panel met, to KFS management and staff who provided valuable insights and information to the Panel team, and to all those that agreed to meet with the Panel in Kenya and provided information and insights. The Panel wishes to thank Bank Management and Staff for their assistance in obtaining documents, providing the Panel with information, and responding promptly to written requests. The Panel also wishes to thank the World Bank Staff in Washington D.C. and in the Kenya office for assisting with logistical arrangements during the Panel team’s visits to the Project area. The Panel is grateful for the expert advice provided by Dr. Gabrielle Lynch, Dr. Albert K. Barume, and Mr. Charles Meshack, and appreciates the professionalism they exhibited at all times. The Panel wishes to express its deepest gratitude to Dr. Alf Jerve, former Panel member and lead inspector during the first phase of the investigation, for his guidance, support and tireless efforts in fulfilling the Panel’s mandate and function. Finally, the Panel wishes to convey its gratitude and appreciation to the members of its Secretariat for their professional and resourceful handling of this investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Kenya Review Commission (Ckrc)
    CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION (CKRC) VERBATIM REPORT OF CONSTITUENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS, KAPENGURIA CONSTITUENCY MTELO SOCIAL HALL ON Wednesday, 26TH JUNE 2002 CONSTITUENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS, KAPENGURIA CONSTITUENCY, HELD AT MTELO MUNICIPAL HALL ON WEDNESDAY 26th JUNE 2002 Present: Com. Idha Salim - Chairing Com. Prof. Wanjiku Kabira Secretariat Staff in Attendance: Irene Marsit - Programme Officer Geoffrey Imende - Assistant Programme Officer Josephine Ndung’u - Verbatim Recorder District Co-ordinator: Ikiwa umejiandikisha tafadhali usiende mbali. Njoo hapa ndani ukaketi, ili uweze kufuatana na wengine. Please do not register and leave. Come, we shall be calling you, according to your registration. Tafadhali ukijiandikisha njoo hapa dani. Tutafuata jinsi mliovyo jiandikisha. Wale ambao wanafika wakati huu tafadhali jiandikishe pale mlangoni. Wale ambao wanawasili muda ungali kuanzia sasa hadi jioni. Nafasi yenu ndiyo hii. Tafadhali fikeni hapa na mjiandikishe pale mlangoni halafu mketi hapa ili tuweze kuwapata. Please register, come and sit here so that we may call you according to your registration. Tafadhali. (Vernacular dialect) Tafadhali fikeni. Na wale ambao wangependa kuja muingie ndani mtasikia maoni ikitolewa. Tafadhali viti viko vingi. Come in please. Kujeni kutoka huko nje makasikize jinsi maoni itatolewa. Interjection: (inaudible) District Co-ordinator: Tafadhali ukijiandikisha ingia ndani. Usiondoke kwa sababu vile mlivyo jiandikishe 2 ndivyo mtakavyo ingia hapa ndani kutoa maoni. Na wale wengine ingieni dani, ili muweze kurahisisha kazi. Kama umejiandikisha ingia ndani. Com. Salim: Habari za asubuhi? Sisi kama mlivyo hisi wenyewe ni wanatume wa tume ya kurebisha Katiba. Tumefika hapa hivi leo, hapa Kapenguria kuanza kupokea maoni ya wenyeji wa hapa. Na tumefurahi sana kuwa tumepata nafasi hii ya kuja kwenu hapa, kuwajua na kuwasikiza na kuelezena na nyinyi jambo hili muhimu sana.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf, 1008
    Human Rights and Business Country Guide Kenya Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 How to Use this Guide .............................................................................................. 3 Rights Holders at Risk ............................................................................................... 7 Child Labour ........................................................................................................... 18 Forced Labour ........................................................................................................ 23 Occupational Health & Safety ................................................................................. 26 Trade Unions .......................................................................................................... 29 Working Conditions ................................................................................................ 33 Environment .......................................................................................................... 39 Land & Property ..................................................................................................... 49 Revenue Transparency & Management .................................................................. 54 Security & Conflict .................................................................................................. 62 Access to Remedy ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flares of Marginalization in Kenya
    FLARES OF MARGINALIZATION AMONG NATIONAL GENDER AND EQUALITY COMMISSION SELECTED MINORITY COMMUNITIES OF KENYA Solution Tech Place, 1st Flr, Longonot Road, Upperhill, next to Crowne Plaza Hotel P. O. BOX 27512-00506, Nairobi, Kenya Tel +254 2(20)-272-7778 Tweet @NGECKENYA www.facebook.com/NGECKenya www.ngeckenya.org UNDP through Governments of Sweden and Finland supported the printing and dissemination of this report REPUBLIC OF KENYA The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies or their associates. RESULTS OF PUBLIC EDUCATION AND INFORMATION FORUMS HELD IN COAST, RIFT VALLEY AND EASTERN REGIONS: MAY 12 -19, 2013 FLARES OF MARGINALIZATION AMONG SELECTED MINORITY COMMUNITIES OF KENYA RESULTS OF PUBLIC EDUCATION AND INFORMATION FORUMS HELD IN COAST, RIFT VALLEY AND EASTERN REGIONS: MAY 12 -19, 2013 ©NGEC April, 2014 NATIONAL COMMISSION ON GENDER AND EQUALITY COMMISSION i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgement ............................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... v 1.0 Background ..................................................................................... 1 1.1. The 2010 constitution of Kenya: depth and breadth of marginalization ...
    [Show full text]
  • Special Working Document for the National Constitutional Conference
    SPECIAL WORKING DOCUMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE REPORT ON CULTURE PREPARED BY THE COMMISSION AND APPROVED FOR ISSUE AT A STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 19TH AUGUST, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. 1 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................ 7 PART I: THE CONCEPT OF CULTURE AND ITS APPLICATION ...................................... 22 1.0 MANDATE ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.0 THE CONCEPT OF CULTURE AND ITS APPLICATION..................................... 22 2.1 Definition of Culture................................................................................................ 22 2.2 What Culture is not.................................................................................................. 23 2.3 Culture As Applied To Development...................................................................... 23 2.4 Culture, Policy And Development Planning ........................................................... 26 2.5 Culture, Linguistic Diversity And Language Policy ............................................... 31 2.6 Globalizations and Culture .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rift Valley - Eldoret - RTJRC03.10 (Eldoret Municipal Hall)
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 10-3-2011 Public Hearing Transcripts - Rift Valley - Eldoret - RTJRC03.10 (Eldoret Municipal Hall) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Public Hearing Transcripts - Rift Valley - Eldoret - RTJRC03.10 (Eldoret Municipal Hall)" (2011). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 104. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/104 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORAL SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION ON MONDAY 3 RD OCTOBER, 2011 AT THE ELDORET MUNICIPAL HALL PRESENT Berhanu Dinka - The Presiding Chair, Ethiopia Gertrude Chawatama - Commissioner, Zambia Tecla W. Namachanja - The Acting Chair, Kenya Ahmed Farah - Commissioner, Kenya (The Commission commenced at 10.30 a.m.) The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Dinka): Good morning. It is a pleasure for me and the rest of the Commissioners to be in Eldoret. Before we start, I would like to tell you the ground rules about public hearings. First and foremost, please, switch off your mobile phones. Remain silent and listen to the witness. You may agree or not agree with what the witness says, but, please, give him or her dignity and respect that they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Dwellers Vs. the Government? Exploring Opportunities for Conflict Resolution in the Case of the Sengwer in Cherangani Hills, Kenya
    Forest dwellers vs. the government? Exploring opportunities for conflict resolution in the case of the Sengwer in Cherangani Hills, Kenya Roy Winkelhuijzen Reg. nr. 930211962030 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bas Arts Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group (FNP) Wageningen University October 2017 This page was unintentionally left blank. 2 Forest dwellers vs. the government? Exploring opportunities for conflict resolution in the case of the Sen gwer in Cherangani Hills, Kenya Author: Roy Winkelhuijzen Registration number: 930211-962-030 MSc Forest and Nature Conservation Specialisation: Policy and Society Master track: Sustainable Development Diplomacy [email protected] MSc thesis: MSc Thesis Forest and Nature Conservation Policy FNP-80436 Wageningen University Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bas Arts Wageningen University & Research WU Environmental Sciences Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group (FNP) Supported by: Wageningen, October 2017 Disclaimer: This MSc report may not be copied in whole or in parts without permission of the author and the chair group. This report was written to be as accurate and complete as possible. Title page: A makeshift house in Kapkok glade, inside Embobut forest. Picture by author. 3 Acknowledgements This thesis is the result of more than half a year’s work, to finalise my studies at Wageningen University. It has been a very interesting and instructive adventure, which included six weeks of conducting interviews in Kenya. There are many people without whom this report would not have been possible. I would like to thank them here. First, I thank my parents for their continued support throughout my studies, my two brothers for the relativizing joke in between, and my girlfriend for her love and for pulling me through the more difficult moments in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Cherangany Hills, Kenya – State
    Governance regarding land and water distribution in Africa The case of the Cherangany Hills, Kenya - State forest protection is forcing people from their lands Justin Kenrick, Forest Peoples Programme, November 2014 1. Background This study focuses on State conservation initiatives in the Cherangany Hills, Kenya. This concerns a World Bank funded project: the Natural Resource Management Project (NRMP) in Kenya’s Cherangany Hills. Support for this project, in which the World Bank was joined by various other donor agencies, including the Finnish government, is in aid of the Kenyan Forest Service to protect the Cherangany Hills in order to secure their key water catchments functions. The foreign funded interventions by the KFS led to massive evictions of the region’s traditional occupants, the Sengwer people, plus others who had moved into the area more recently. These developments led to international controversy and, following complaints, the World Bank’s Independent Inspection Panel investigated the case. The Panel issued a report which highlighted serious violations of the Bank’s own safeguards and Kenya’s obligations under international environmental and human rights conventions. The Cherangany Hills ecology The Cherangany Hills cuts across four administrative districts in Rift Valley Province. The hills are largely covered by a series of indigenous forests. These forests are made up of 12 administrative blocks.1 The Hills are important biodiversity hotspots as they harbour several forest types and regionally threatened species such as the Lammergeyer, African Crown Eagle, Red Chested Owlet, Sitatunga and Thick Billed Honey Guide. Several Ecosystems depend on water originating from it, including: Lake Victoria (Shared by Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania), Lake Turkana and Saiwa Swamp National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • They Protect the Forests. Who Protects Them?
    They Protect the Forests. Who Protects Them? THE INTERSECTION OF CONSERVATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF FOREST DEFENDERS Lessons from Kenya, Peru and Sri Lanka International Human Rights Clinic Report May 2017 International Law and Organizations Program May 2017 Dedication We dedicate this report to all individuals and collectives who put themselves at great risk to protect the world’s forests and the natural resources within them. We hope that their concerns regarding forest protection will be respectfully Tiffany Basciano heard and that they are provided the space to safely voice their opinions. As such, we call on governments, non- M.Caitlin Erskine State actors, and international institutions to respect the rights of all environmental human rights defenders. Sara L.M. Golden Furthermore, we wish to dedicate this report to those who have been killed for protecting the environment. The Goldman Environmental Prize was established to honor individuals who defend and protect their land and the Kady R. Hammer natural environment at great personal risk. We dedicate this report to Isidro Baldenegro López, second winner of the Goldman Award and indigenous activist, who was killed this year. Throughout his life, he continuously Fabio Iannuzzelli protected ancient forests through nonviolent campaigns and his legacy serves as a reminder of the immense Sarah Sebbar dangers these individuals face to protect their land. We further dedicate this report to Berta Cáceres, who was murdered in 2016, and never stopped her fight to protect her community despite ceaseless threats and intimidation. Rucheta Singh Natalie K. Thomure Anne Tousignant Miller Anahita Vasudevan Madison Wilcox This report is a project of the International Human Rights Clinic, an experiential learning course in the International Law and Organizations Program at Johns Hopkins University – The Paul H.
    [Show full text]
  • E1677 REPUBLIC of KENYA Public Disclosure Authorized
    E1677 REPUBLIC OF KENYA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT PROJECT (KAPSLMP) REVISED REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized 15th June, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) P.O. Box 57811- 00200 Nairobi Tel: 4183301-20 Fax: 4183344 Email: [email protected] Webpage: www.kari.org TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 12 1.1 OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................ 12 1.3 PRINCIPLES AND METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................... 14 1.4 REPORT LAYOUT............................................................................................................................. 14 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ....................................................................... 16 2.1 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................... 16 2.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Kenya Review Commission Ckrc
    CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION CKRC VERBATIM REPORT OF CONSTITUENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS MT. ELGON CONSTITUENCY AT KAPSOKWONY HIGH SCHOOL ON 29 JULY, 2002 CONSTITUENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS MT. ELGON CONSTITUENCY HELD AT KAPSOWKWONY HIGH SCHOOL ON 29.07.02 PRESENT Com. Mosonik Arap Korir - in chair Com. Lenaola Isaac Com. Zein Abubakar Secretariat in Attendance Hassan Mohammed - Programme Officer Joyce Wamucii - Assistant Programme Officer Marion Nekesa - Verbatim Recorder The meeting started at 10.25am with Com. Mosonik in Chair. Com. Mosonik Arap Korir: ………..kuna Bwana Hassan Mohammed ambaye ni huyu, yeye ni Programme Officer katika Tume. Tena ako na naibu wake Assistant Programme Officer Bi. Joyce Wamucii, upande ule mwingine. Halafu wa mwisho ni Marion Nekesa ameketi upande huu, yeye ni Verbatim Recorder. Verbatim Recorder ni kusema yeye ana nasa maoni yenu kwa kanda ama kwa machine. Tuonyeshe namna hii tafadhali tuione? Kwamba yale yote mtayasema yatanaswa moja kwa moja kwa kanda. Assistant Programme Officer ambaye yuko upande ule, yaani Joyce, atakuwa pia akiandika maoni yenu mukiyasema. Kwa hivyo kuna njia tatu tutachukua maoni yenu, yatakuwa yakinaswa kwa kanda, halafu Assistant Programme officer atakuwa anaandika, inaaitwa long hand, pia sisi Ma-Commissioner watatu tutakuwa tukiandika mkisema. Wakati mwingine mkiona kama hatuandiki, hiyo recorder inafanya kazi, verbatim. Tukirudi Nairobi everything we will transcribed. Taratibu ya kazi ya leo ni kwamba, kwanza kila mtu akiingia anajiandikisha mlangoni kwa form hii, registration form. Ukijiandikisha unasema kama utatoa maoni ama hata kama unahudhuria tu mkutano ama kikao unaandika, na unasema mimi nitakuwa tu observer. Ukisema una maoni ya kuyatoa, unaeleza kama ni maoni yameandikwa yaani memorandum, au written au tuseme maoni ya kutoa kwa mdomo tu na ukitoa kwa njia hiyo tunasema oral submissions; Memo, written, oral.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearing Transcripts - Rift Valley - Kitale - RTJRC21.10 (Museum Hall Kitale)
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 10-21-2011 Public Hearing Transcripts - Rift Valley - Kitale - RTJRC21.10 (Museum Hall Kitale) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Public Hearing Transcripts - Rift Valley - Kitale - RTJRC21.10 (Museum Hall Kitale)" (2011). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 93. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/93 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORAL SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION HELD ON FRIDAY, 21 ST OCTOBER, 2011, AT MUSEUM HALL, KITALE PRESENT Margaret Wambui Shava - The Presiding Chair, Kenya Tecla Namachanja Wanjala - The Acting Chair, Kenya Berhanu Dinka - Commissioner, Ethiopia Tom Ojienda - Commissioner, Kenya Ahmed Farah - Commissioner, Kenya IN ATTENDANCE Chavangi T. Aziz - Leader of Evidence Simon Njenga - Hearing Clerk (The Commission commenced at 10.05 a.m.) (The Presiding Chair introduced herself and the other Commissioners) (Opening) The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Shava) : Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to these proceedings. This is the first day of our public hearings here in Kitale. The Commission is very happy to be here to interact with you.
    [Show full text]