DOCSLIB.ORG

2009 KENYA POPULATION and HOUSING CENSUS 24 /25 August

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2009 KENYA POPULATION and HOUSING CENSUS 24 /25 August KNBS KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Keeping you informed Republic of Kenya 2009 KENYA POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS 24th/25th August, 2009 ENUMERATOR’S INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL JULY 2009 Table of Contents PART 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1. POPULATION CENSUS ............................................................................................................. 1 2. OBJECTIVE OF THE 2009 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS ........................................... 1 3. THE CENSUS ORGANIZATION ................................................................................................. 1 3.1 National Census Officer ...................................................................................................................... 1 3.2 Board of Directors, KNBS ................................................................................................................... 1 3.3 National Census Coordinator ............................................................................................................ 1 3.4 National Census Steering Committee (NCSC) ............................................................................... 2 3.5 Technical Working Committee (TWC) ............................................................................................ 2 3.6 Census Secretariat ............................................................................................................................... 2 3.7 District Census Committees (DCC) ................................................................................................... 2 3.8 Divisional Census Committees .......................................................................................................... 2 4. LEGAL AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE CENSUS .................................................................. 3 5. CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE INFORMATION ............................................................................ 3 6. ROLE OF THE ENUMERATOR .................................................................................................. 3 7. HOW TO HANDLE INTERVIEWS .............................................................................................. 4 8. REQUIRED MATERIALS ........................................................................................................... 5 PART II: GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ..................................................................................................... 6 9. THE ENUMERATION AREA (EA) .............................................................................................. 6 10. DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF EAS .......................................................................................... 12 12. HOW TO DETERMINE DISTANCES USING SCALES ................................................................ 13 16. SOME KEY CONCEPTS FOR THE 2009 CENSUS UNDERTAKING ............................................. 6 16.1 Homestead.............................................................................................................................. 6 16.2 Household .............................................................................................................................................. 6 16.3 Household Head ................................................................................................................................. 10 16.4 Respondent ......................................................................................................................................... 10 16.5 Structure .............................................................................................................................................. 10 16.6 Dwelling Unit ..................................................................................................................................... 10 16.7 Enumeration Area (EA) ..................................................................................................................... 10 16.8 De Facto Census ................................................................................................................................. 11 17. WHO AND WHEN SHOULD YOU ENUMERATE..................................................................... 15 18. WHAT HAPPENS IF THERE IS NO ONE AT HOME ................................................................. 16 19. USE OF CHALK/CARDS .......................................................................................................... 17 20. THE MAIN CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................................... 17 21. CHECKING YOUR WORK ....................................................................................................... 18 PART III: HOW TO FILL IN THE MAIN QUESTIONNAIRE ..................................................................... 18 22. GENERAL RULES .................................................................................................................... 18 23. LAYOUT OF THE MAIN CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................... 19 24. THE INTERVIEW AND THE QUESTIONS ................................................................................ 20 25. SECTION A: INFORMATION REGARDING ALL PERSONS ...................................................... 21 25.1 Column P00: Name ............................................................................................................................ 21 25.3 Columns P10 and P11: Relationship and Sex .............................................................................. 22 25.4 Column P12: Age ................................................................................................................................ 23 25.7 Column P15: Tribe/Nationality ....................................................................................................... 27 25.8 Column P16: Religion ........................................................................................................................ 28 26. Column P17: Marital Status ............................................................................................................. 28 27. Column P18: Birth Place ................................................................................................................... 29 28. Column P19: Previous Residence ................................................................................................... 29 29. Columns P20‐P21: Duration of Residence ................................................................................... 30 30. Columns P22‐P23: Orphanhood ..................................................................................................... 30 31. SECTION B: INFORMATION REGARDING FEMALES AGED 12 YEARS AND ABOVE ............ 31 ii 31.1 Columns P24 to P31: Particulars of All Live Births ..................................................................... 31 31.2 Columns P24‐P25: Children Born Alive ......................................................................................... 31 31.3 Columns P26‐P27: Children Living in the Household................................................................. 32 31.4 Columns P28‐P29: Children Living Elsewhere ............................................................................. 32 31.5 Columns P30‐P31: Children Who Have Died ............................................................................... 32 31.6 Columns P32 to P36: Particulars of Last Live Births ................................................................... 33 31.7 Columns P32‐P33: Last Child Born ................................................................................................. 33 31.8 Column P34: Birth Notification ....................................................................................................... 33 31.9 Column P35: Sex of the Child ......................................................................................................... 33 31.10 Column P36: Survival Status of Last Born Child .......................................................................... 33 32. SECTION C: INFORMATION REGARDING DISABILITY ...............................................................34 32.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 34 32.2 Definition of disability ....................................................................................................................... 34 32.3 Types of disabilities ........................................................................................................................... 35 32.4 Columns P37 to P38: Information Regarding Persons with Disability ................................... 36 33. SECTION D: EDUCATION STATUS FOR PERSONS AGED 3 YEARS AND ABOVE .....................36 33.1 Columns P39, P40 and P41: Education ......................................................................................... 36 33.2 Definitions ........................................................................................................................................... 36 33.3 Column P39: School /Learning Institution Attendance ............................................................. 38 33.4 Column P40: Highest Standard/Form/Level of Education Reached .....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cholera Outbreak Has Affected 7 Counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties
    MINISTRY OF HEALTH CHOLERA SITUATION REPORT IN KENYA AS AT 5TH MAY 2015 Weekly Situation Summary Since 26th December 2014, Cholera outbreak has affected 7 counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties. Migori, Homabay and Bomet Cholera outbreaks are now considered successfully controlled The outbreak first started in Nairobi County on 26th December 2014. Later the outbreak was reported in Migori County on 30th January 2015, Homa Bay County on 2nd February 2015, Bomet County on 12th March 2015, Mombasa County on 6th April 2015, Nakuru 8th April and Muranga county on 18th April 2015. As of 5th May 2015, a total of 2156 cases and 42 deaths (CFR=1.9%) had been reported nationally distributed as follows: Nairobi 145 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 3.4%); Migori 915 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 1.3%); Homa Bay 377 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 1.4%) , Bomet 272 cases, 2 deaths (CFR 1.5%) ,Mombasa 69 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 7.2%), Muranga 278 cases, 1 death (0.4%), and Nakuru 100 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 12%) Cumulatively, 274 new cases were reported in the last one week (164 in Muranga, 73 in Nakuru, 17 in Mombasa and 20 in Nairobi). This is an increase from the previous week where 35 new cases were reported. 6 new deaths were reported in the last one week (5 in Nakuru and 1 in Nairobi). There are 34 current admissions in Mombasa, Nakuru and Nairobi Counties. 1 | Page New cases reported in Nairobi were detected in new epicentres- Kibera, Mukuru Kayiaba and Mukuru Kwa Njenga slums.
    [Show full text]
  • County Urban Governance Tools
    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Wildlife in African Landscapes Kenya’S Ewaso Ecosystem
    Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press smithsonian contributions to zoology • number 632 Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press AConserving Chronology Wildlife of Middlein African Missouri Landscapes Plains Kenya’sVillage Ewaso SitesEcosystem Edited by NicholasBy Craig J. M. Georgiadis Johnson with contributions by Stanley A. Ahler, Herbert Haas, and Georges Bonani SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of “diffusing knowledge” was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com- mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to History and Technology Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Museum Conservation Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report on the research and collections of its various museums and bureaus. The Smithsonian Contributions Series are distributed via mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institu- tions throughout the world. Manuscripts submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press from authors with direct affilia- tion with the various Smithsonian museums or bureaus and are subject to peer review and review for compliance with manuscript preparation guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genealogical Linguistic Implication of the Abaluhyia Naming System
    IJRDO-Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research ISSN : 2456-2971 A GENEALOGICAL LINGUISTIC IMPLICATION OF THE ABALUHYIA NAMING SYSTEM David Wafula Lwangale (Egerton University) [email protected] or [email protected] ABSTRACT Most African communities have a systematic way of naming their children. The naming system of a given community speaks a lot about their way of life. Some communities have family names which cannot be attributed to any meaning. Such names may be regarded generally as clan names. Some names may be attributed to some events and seasons. Others may be inherited in a situation where communities name their children after their dead or living relatives. Therefore, names are not only cultural but also linguistic. The study investigated the naming systems of the Luhyia sub-tribes with a view of establishing the genealogical relatedness of the Luluhyia language dialects. The study established three levels of naming children shared by most of the Luhyia sub-nations. These are based on seasons, events and naming after their dead relatives. Key words: genealogical, language, name, male and female Background to the Study Luhyia dialects have been extensively studied over a long period of time. The speakers of Luluhyia dialects are generally referred to as AbaLuhyia who were initially known as Bantu Kavirondo as a result of their being close to Lake Victoria in Kavirondo Gulf. The Luhyia nation, tribe or ethnic group consists of seventeen sub-nations or dialect speaking sub-groups. These include Abakhayo, Babukusu, Abanyala, Abanyore, Abatsotso, Abetakho, Abesukha, Abakabras, Abakisa, Abalogoli, Abamarachi, Abasamia, Abatachoni, Abatiriki and Abawanga.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of 100 Tachoni Proverbs and Wise Sayings
    A COLLECTION OF 100 TACHONI PROVERBS AND WISE SAYINGS By ANNASTASI OISEBE African Proverbs Working Group NAIROBI, KENYA AUGUST, 2017. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to acknowledge and thank the relentless effort for all those who played a major part in completion of this document. My utmost thanks go to Fr. Joseph G. Healey, both financial and moral support. My special thanks goes to CephasAgbemenu, Margaret Ireri and Elias Bushiri who guided me accordingly to ensure that my research was completed. Furthermore I also want to thank Edwin Kola for his enormous assistance, without forgetting publishers of Tachoni proverbs and resources who made this research possible. DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my parents Anthony and Margret Oisebe and the entire African Proverbs working group Nairobi and all readers of African literature. INTRODUCTION Location The Tachoni (We shall be back in Kalenjin) are Kalenjins assimilated by Luhya people of Western Kenya, sharing land with the Bukusu tribe. They live mainly in Webuye, Chetambe Hills, Ndivisi (of Bungoma County) and the former Lugari District in the Kakamega County. Most Tachoni clans living in Bungoma speak the 'Lubukusu' dialect of the Luhya language making them get mistaken as Bukusus. They spread to Trans-Nzoia County especially around Kitale, Mumias and Busia. The ethnic group is rich in beliefs and taboos. The most elaborate cultural practice they have is circumcision. The ethnographical location of the Tachoni ethnic group in Kenya Myth of Origin One of the most common myths among the Luhya group relates to the origin of the Earth and human beings. According to this myth, Were (God) first created Heaven, then Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Mumias Settlement Into an Urban Centre to Circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga
    The evolution of Mumias settlement into an urban centre to circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga To cite this version: Godwin Rapando Murunga. The evolution of Mumias settlement into an urban centre to circa 1940. Geography. 1998. dumas-01302363 HAL Id: dumas-01302363 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01302363 Submitted on 14 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE EVOLUTION OF MUMIAS SETTLEMENT INTO AN URBAN CENTRE TO CIRCA 1940 BY GODWIN RAPANDO MURUNGA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE AT KENYATTA UNIVERSITY IFRA 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 IFRA001481 No. d'inventaire Date te0 Cote August 1998 .1 •MS,Har,f..42G. , , (1. R Y 001 l°\1)..j9". E DECLARATION This thesis is my original work, and to the best of my knowlehe, has not been submitted for a degree in any university. GODWIN RAPANDO MURUNGA This thesis has been submitted with my approval as a University supervisor. .4010 PROF.ERIC MASINDE ASEKA iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my wife Carolyne Temoi Rapando and to my sons Tony Wangatia Rapando and Claude Manya Rapando for their patience and constant understanding during the long years of working.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife and Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Taita, Kenya Njogu, J.G
    Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective: wildlife and forest biodiversity conservation in Taita, Kenya Njogu, J.G. Citation Njogu, J. G. (2004). Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective: wildlife and forest biodiversity conservation in Taita, Kenya. Leiden: African Studies Centre. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12921 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12921 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective African Studies Centre Research Report 73 / 2004 Community-based conservation in an entitlement perspective Wildlife and forest biodiversity conservation in Taita, Kenya James Gichiah Njogu This PhD project was part of the research programme Resources, Environment and Development Research Associates (REDRA) of the Amsterdam Research Institute for Global Issues and Development Studies (AGIDS). It also formed part of Working Programme 1, Natural resource management: Knowledge transfer, social insecurity and cultural coping, of the Research School for Resource Studies for Development (CERES). The Netherlands Foundation for the Advancement of Tropical Research (WOTRO) jointly with the Amsterdam Research Institute for Global Issues and Development Studies (AGIDS) of the University of Amsterdam funded this research. The School of Environmental Studies of Moi University (Eldoret, Kenya) provided institutional support. Published by: African Studies Centre P.O. Box 9555 2300 RB Leiden Tel: + 31 - 71 - 527 33 72 Fax: + 31 - 71 - 527 33 44 E-mail: [email protected] Website:http://asc.leidenuniv.nl Printed by: PrintPartners Ipskamp B.V., Enschede ISBN 90.5448.057.2 © African Studies Centre, Leiden, 2004 Contents List of maps viii List of figures viii List of boxes viii List of tables ix List of plates x List of abbreviations x Acknowledgements xii PART 1: THE CONTEXT 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya at 50: Unrealized Rights of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples
    report Kenya at 50: unrealized rights of minorities and indigenous peoples By Korir Sing’Oei Abraham Two young Turkana herders near the village of Kache Imeri in Turkana District, northern Kenya. Frederic Courbet / Panos. Acknowledgements also currently represents other minority groups in ongoing This document has been produced with strategic litigation and was a leading actor in the the financial assistance of the European development and drafting of Kenya’s constitutional Union. The contents of this document provisions on minority groups and marginalization. are the sole responsibility of Minority Rights Group International and can Minority Rights Group International under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a position of the European Union. MRG's local implementation nongovernmental organization (NGO) working to secure the partner is the Ogiek Peoples Development Programme rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and (OPDP). indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation and understanding between communities. Our activities are Commissioning Editor: Beth Walker, Production Coordinator: focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and Jasmin Qureshi, Copy editor: Sophie Richmond, outreach. We are guided by the needs expressed by our Typesetter: Kavita Graphics. worldwide partner network of organizations, which represent minority and indigenous peoples. The Author Korir Sing’Oei Abraham is a co-founder of the Centre for MRG works with over 150 organizations in nearly 50 Minority Rights Development. He is a human rights attorney countries. Our governing Council, which meets twice a year, and an advocate of the High Court of Kenya. For more than has members from 10 different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Bungoma County Council Hall)
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 7-9-2011 Public Hearing Transcripts - Western - Bungoma - RTJRC09.07 (Bungoma County Council Hall) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Public Hearing Transcripts - Western - Bungoma - RTJRC09.07 (Bungoma County Council Hall)" (2011). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 133. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/133 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORAL SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION HELD ON SATURDAY, 9 TH JULY, 2011 AT BUNGOMA COUNTY COUNCIL HALL PRESENT Gertrude Chawatama - The Presiding Chair, Zambia Berhanu Dinka - Commissioner, Ethiopia Ahmed Sheikh Farah - Commissioner, Kenya (The Commission commenced at 10.00 a.m.) (The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama) introduced herself and the other TJRC Commissioners) (Opening Prayers) The Presiding Chair (Commissioner Chawatama): Please, be seated. On behalf of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC), I welcome you to our sittings on the second day here in Bungoma. The TJRC thanks you for the warm welcome. It was an honor and privilege to have heard witnesses yesterday who touched on various violations which included torture, murder, wrongful or unfair dismissal and the issue of land.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Woman As Mother And
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Woman as Mother and Wife in the African Context of the Family in the Light of John Paul II’s Anthropological and Theological Foundation: The Case Reflected within the Bantu and Nilotic Tribes of Kenya A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America For the Degree Doctor of Sacred Theology © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Joseph Okech Adhunga Washington, D. C. 2012 Woman as Mother and Wife in the African Context of the Family in the Light of John Paul II’s Anthropological and Theological Foundation: The Case reflected within the Bantu and Nilotic Tribes of Kenya Joseph Okech Adhunga, S.T.D. Director: Brian V. Johnstone, S.T.D. This study examines the theological and anthropological foundations of the understanding of the dignity and vocation of woman as mother and wife, gifts given by God that expresses the riches of the African concept of family. There are two approaches to inculturation theology in Africa, namely, that which attempts to construct African theology by starting from the biblical ecclesial teachings and finds from them what features of African are relevant to the Christian theological and anthropological values, and the other one takes the African cultural background as the point of departure. The first section examines the cultural concept of woman as a mother and wife in the African context of the family, focusing mainly on the Bantu and Nilotic tribes of Kenya. This presentation examines African creation myths, oral stories, some key concepts, namely life, family, clan and community, marriage and procreation, and considers the understandings of African theologians and bishops relating to the “the Church as Family.” The second section examines the theological anthropology of John Paul II focusing mainly on his Theology of the Body and Mulieris Dignitatem.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 National Survey on Male Involvement in FP and RH in Kenya
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA 2014 National Survey on MALE INVOLVEMENTINVOLVEMENT in Family Planning and Reproductive Health in Kenya 2014 National Survey | Male Involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health 01 All rights reserved. This publication has been made possible by the Government of Kenya and the National Council for Population and Development. Any part of this document may be quoted provided the source is acknowledged. -XQE]RSXFIWSPHSVYWIHMRGSRNYRGXMSR[MXLGSQQIVGMEPTYVTSWIWJSVTVS½X The contents are the responsibility of the National Council for Population and Development. 02 2014 National Survey | Male Involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health 2014 National Survey on Male Involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health in Kenya National Council for Population and Development November 2014 2014 National Survey | Male Involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health i ii 2014 National Survey | Male Involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health Foreword The 2014 National Survey on Male Involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health was carried out to provide empirical and current information to policy makers, planners, researchers, and programme managers on the underlining factors for low male involvement in Family Planning and Reproductive Health in Kenya. 7TIGM½GEPP] XLI WYVZI] GSPPIGXIH HEXE SR GSQQYRMX] members’ knowledge of family planning and reproductive health, their attitude and beliefs towards family planning and reproductive health, the extent of male involvement in family planning and reproductive health, and barriers to men’s involvement in family planning and reproductive health. The survey also examined the existing policy and programme responses to male involvement with a view to generating pragmatic recommendations to enhance male involvement. Data were collected using various qualitative data collection techniques.
    [Show full text]