DOCSLIB.ORG

Isolation, Characterization and Substrate-Transport Studies of a New, Unique Methylotroph

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RICE UNIVERSITY ISOLATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND SUBSTRATE-TRANSPORT STUDIES OF A NEW, UNIQUE METHYLOTROPH by Thomas Alan Keuer A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFULLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Master of Science APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: E. Terry Papoutsakis, Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering LarryOf. Mclntire, Professor and Chairman of Chemical Engineering <03^ ' Roger Storck, Professor of Biology Houston, Texas April, 1984 3 1272 00289 0232 ABSTRACT Keuer, Thomas A. M.S. Rice University, April 1984. Isolation, Characterization and Substrate-Transport Studies of a New, Unique Methylotroph. Major Professor: E. T. Papoutsakis. Methylotrophic bacteria which assimilate carbon via the Ribulose Monophosphate Pathway are bioenergetically superior to other methylotrophs. The dehydrogenases which catalyze the oxidation of formaldehyde to formate and formate to CO2 in RMP bacteria produce much of the ATP required for biosynthesis. A strain, designated T15, has been isolated on the basis of high In vitro activities of the above two key enzymes, and has been biochemically characterized. The new strain exhibits high yields (up to 0.63 g cells/g MeOH) and growth rates (up to 0.46 hr“^) in batch culture? however, the yields and growth rates in continuous culture are significantly lower. Study of the transport mechanisms has provided valuable insight into the relationship between substrate uptake and the growth characteristics of T15. Experi¬ ments with radiolabelled substrates have indicated that methanol enters the cells primarily by diffusion? consequently, the bacteria are not able to accumulate methanol internally in order to support efficient Ill continuous growth. Formaldehyde, on the other hand, is accumulated by an active transport system which depends on the A pH component of the membrane proton-motive force. The formate uptake mechanism is also dependent on the ApH, but ‘is more complex, possibly due to the uncoupling effect of the organic acid on the cell membrane. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to recognize those whose assistance made the completion of this thesis possible. Dr. E. T. Papoutsakis, for support, guidance and encouragement during the course of this research. Dr. L. V. Inlntire and Dr. R. Storck, for serving on my thesis committee. Chris Bussineau, for his assistance in the early part of this research. Anil Diwan, for building the apparatus and develop¬ ing the procedure for the substrate-transport experiments, and for his generous help during the course of my work. Monsanto Corporation, for providing me with the opportunity and financial support to make this endeavor possible. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES viii NOMENCLATURES ix ABSTRACT iii INTRODUCTION 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS 14 I. Chemicals and Biochemicals 14 II. Chemical Assays 15 III. Selection and Growth of the Microorgan¬ ism 16 IV. Dry Weight Determination 20 V. Preparation of Cell-Free Extracts ... 21 VI. Enzyme Assays 21 VII. Yield Measurements 23 VIII. Other Characterization Techniques ... 24 IX. Preparation of Whole Cell Suspensions . 26 X. Transport Studies 26 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 32 I. Isolation and Selection of the Micro¬ organism .... 32 II. Other Enzyme Activities for T15 .... 35 i) 3-Hexulose Phosphate Synthase (HPS ) 36 ii) Methanol Dehydrognase (MDH) ... 37 iii) Glucose 6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (GPD) and 6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase (PGD) ...... 38 III. T15 Batch Growth Experiments 40 i) pH Profile 40 ii) Growth on Pure Substrates .... 42 iii) Growth on Mixed Substrates. ... 46 V Page iv) Discussion: The Mechanism of Substrate Inhibition 48 v) T15 Batch Yields 52 IV. Systematics: General Characterization of T15 58 i) General Characterization 59 ii) Morphological Characterization . 59 iii) Physiological Tests. 60 V. Continuous Culture Experiments with T15. 62 VI. Formate Uptake by T15: Proton Transloca¬ tion Measurements 68 VII. Radiolabelled Substrate-Transport Studies 76 i) Measurement of T15 Cell Volume . 76 ii) ^C-labelled Methanol Uptake ... 80 iii) 1’C-labelled Formaldehye Uptake. 80 iv) l^C-labelled Formate Uptake. ... 84 v) Discussion 86 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK . 93 LIST OF REFERENCES 97 APPENDIX 102 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. NAD+-linked Formaldehyde and Formate Dehydrogenase Activities of Soil Isolates 34 2. T15 Growth on Various Carbon Sources 60 Appendix Table A1. Formaldehyde DH Activities for Isolated Strains 102 A2. Formate DH Activities for Isolated Strains 103 A3. T15 3-Hexulose Phosphate Synthase Activities 104 A4. T15 MeOH Dehydrogenase Activities 106 A5. T15 Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Activities 107 A6. T15 6-Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase Activities 108 A7. T15 Batch Yield Data 110 A8. Continuous Culture Yields for T15 Ill A9. Glycerol Uptake Experiment #1 117 A10. Glycerol Uptake Experiment #2 118 All. Sucrose Uptake Experiment #1 119 A12. Sucrose Uptake Experiment #2 120 A13. Methanol Uptake Experiment #1 121 A14. Methanol UPtake Experiment #2 122 A15. Methanol Uptake Experiment #3 123 Table Page A16. Formaldehyde Uptake Experiment #1 124 A17. Formaldehyde Uptake Experiment #2 125 A18. Formaldehyde + KSCN Uptake Experiment .... 126 A19. Formaldehyde + FCCP Experiment 127 A20. Formate Uptake Experiment 128 A21. Formate + KSCN Experiment 129 A22. Formate + FCCP Experiment #1 130 A23. Formate + FCCP Experimetn #2 131 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Oxidation Pathways in the Ribulose Monophosphate Cycle 4 2. The T15 pH profile 41 3. Batch growth curves for T15 at different initial methanol concentrations 43 4. The effect of fast transfers on T15 growth. 45 5. The inhibitory effect of formaldehyde on T15 growth 47 6. Batch growth curves with methanol and formate 49 7. Biomass yield as a function of initial methanol concentration from batch experi¬ ments 53 8. Formate-induced proton uptake by T15 cells as a function of formate concentration. 72 9. The pH dependence of formate-induced proton uptake 74 10. Glycerol uptake profile 78 11. Sucrose uptake profile 85 12. Methanol uptake profile 81 13. Formaldehyde uptake profile 83 14. Formate uptake profile 85 Appendix Figure Page Al. HPS activity as a function of reaction time . 105 A2. T15 cell dry weight determination 109 NOMENCLATURE ADP,ATP Adenosine di-triphosphate BTB Bromothymol blue indicator CCCP Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone D Dilution rate DCPIP 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol ddH20 Deionized, distilled water FCCP Carbonyl cyanide p-(triflouromethoxy)- phenylhydrazone FDDH Formaldehyde dehydrogenase FDH Formate dehydrogenase G PD Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase HPS 3-hexulose phosphate synthase KSCN Thiocyanate MDH Methanol dehydrogenase NAD,NADH2 Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and its reduced form O.D. Optical density PGA 3-phosphoglycerate PGD 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase PGI Phosphoglucoisomerase PHI Phospho-3-hexulose isomerase pmf Proton-motive force PMS Phenazine methosulfate P/O Moles of inorganic phosphate recovered per atom of oxygen taken up RMP Ribulose monophosphate S Substrate concentration SCP Single cell protein X Biomass concentration X P/0 ratio for methanol oxidation X P/0 ratio for formaldehyde oxidation to formate Cell mass yield, g cells/ g substrate P/0 ratio for formate oxidation Specific growth rate 1 INTRODUCTION In the last twenty years, a vast amount of litera¬ ture has been generated on the physiology and biochemistry of methylotrophic bacteria. Methylotrophs are defined as microorganisms which are able to grow at the expense of reduced carbon compounds containing one or more carbon atoms but no carbon-carbon bonds (Colby and Zatman, 1972). Of special interest are those methylotrophic bacteria which grow on reduced one-carbon (C^) compounds, as they are ubiquitous in nature and are readily isolated from almost any sample of soil or water. Also, these bacteria play a vital role in the global biological carbon and nitrogen cycles. Aside from these fundamental character¬ istics, it was the appreciation of the potential of these bacteria for the production of single cell protein (SCP) from methanol which stimulated the isolation and study of many new species (Anthony, 1982). Methanol is superior to other substrates for SCP prodution due in part to the attractive industrial characteristics that it possesses. MeOH is inexpensive, is produced commercially in large amounts from a variety of chemical feedstocks, is very pure, and is completely miscible in water (Papoutsakis, 1976). Therefore, the methanol-utilizing 2 methylotrophic species are the most attractive for com¬ mercial exploitation. More than half of the operating cost in any SCP process is that of the carbon substrate (Cooney, 1975); consequently, maximization of the biomass yield (Yx/S) is the primary objective of any biochemical engineer working with this process. Perhaps the single most important factor which influences the biomass yield of a methylotrophic species is the biochemical pathway through which the substrate carbon is incorporated into biomass. Carbon assimilation occurs by means of three primary reaction schemes in methanol-utilizing methylo- trophs? the ribulose biphosphate, serine, and ribulose monophosphate pathways. Anthony (1982) has provided a detailed summary and description of the biochemical reactions in each of these pathways. In the ribulose biphosphate pathway, or Calvin cycle, all of the carbon is assimilated at the oxidation level of CO2. The serine pathway involves the formation of cell material from both formaldehyde and CO2. In the ribulose monophos¬
Recommended publications
  • Identification of Active Methylotroph Populations in an Acidic Forest Soil

    Identification of Active Methylotroph Populations in an Acidic Forest Soil

    Microbiology (2002), 148, 2331–2342 Printed in Great Britain Identification of active methylotroph populations in an acidic forest soil by stable- isotope probing Stefan Radajewski,1 Gordon Webster,2† David S. Reay,3‡ Samantha A. Morris,1 Philip Ineson,4 David B. Nedwell,3 James I. Prosser2 and J. Colin Murrell1 Author for correspondence: J. Colin Murrell. Tel: j44 24 7652 2553. Fax: j44 24 7652 3568. e-mail: cmurrell!bio.warwick.ac.uk 1 Department of Biological Stable-isotope probing (SIP) is a culture-independent technique that enables Sciences, University of the isolation of DNA from micro-organisms that are actively involved in a Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK specific metabolic process. In this study, SIP was used to characterize the active methylotroph populations in forest soil (pH 35) microcosms that were exposed 2 Department of Molecular 13 13 13 13 and Cell Biology, to CH3OH or CH4. Distinct C-labelled DNA ( C-DNA) fractions were resolved University of Aberdeen, from total community DNA by CsCl density-gradient centrifugation. Analysis of Institute of Medical 16S rDNA sequences amplified from the 13C-DNA revealed that bacteria related Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK to the genera Methylocella, Methylocapsa, Methylocystis and Rhodoblastus had assimilated the 13C-labelled substrates, which suggested that moderately 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of acidophilic methylotroph populations were active in the microcosms. Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Enrichments targeted towards the active proteobacterial CH3OH utilizers were Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, successful, although none of these bacteria were isolated into pure culture. A UK parallel analysis of genes encoding the key enzymes methanol dehydrogenase 4 Department of Biology, and particulate methane monooxygenase reflected the 16S rDNA analysis, but University of York, PO Box 373, YO10 5YW, UK unexpectedly revealed sequences related to the ammonia monooxygenase of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) from the β-subclass of the Proteobacteria.
  • Adaptive Laboratory Evolution Enhances Methanol Tolerance and Conversion in Engineered Corynebacterium Glutamicum

    Adaptive Laboratory Evolution Enhances Methanol Tolerance and Conversion in Engineered Corynebacterium Glutamicum

    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0954-9 OPEN Adaptive laboratory evolution enhances methanol tolerance and conversion in engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum Yu Wang 1, Liwen Fan1,2, Philibert Tuyishime1, Jiao Liu1, Kun Zhang1,3, Ning Gao1,3, Zhihui Zhang1,3, ✉ ✉ 1234567890():,; Xiaomeng Ni1, Jinhui Feng1, Qianqian Yuan1, Hongwu Ma1, Ping Zheng1,2,3 , Jibin Sun1,3 & Yanhe Ma1 Synthetic methylotrophy has recently been intensively studied to achieve methanol-based biomanufacturing of fuels and chemicals. However, attempts to engineer platform micro- organisms to utilize methanol mainly focus on enzyme and pathway engineering. Herein, we enhanced methanol bioconversion of synthetic methylotrophs by improving cellular tolerance to methanol. A previously engineered methanol-dependent Corynebacterium glutamicum is subjected to adaptive laboratory evolution with elevated methanol content. Unexpectedly, the evolved strain not only tolerates higher concentrations of methanol but also shows improved growth and methanol utilization. Transcriptome analysis suggests increased methanol con- centrations rebalance methylotrophic metabolism by down-regulating glycolysis and up- regulating amino acid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, ribosome biosynthesis, and parts of TCA cycle. Mutations in the O-acetyl-L-homoserine sulfhydrylase Cgl0653 catalyzing formation of L-methionine analog from methanol and methanol-induced membrane-bound transporter Cgl0833 are proven crucial for methanol tolerance. This study demonstrates the importance of
  • Bacterial Metabolism of Methylated Amines and Identification of Novel Methylotrophs in Movile Cave

    Bacterial Metabolism of Methylated Amines and Identification of Novel Methylotrophs in Movile Cave

    The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 195–206 & 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bacterial metabolism of methylated amines and identification of novel methylotrophs in Movile Cave Daniela Wischer1, Deepak Kumaresan1,4, Antonia Johnston1, Myriam El Khawand1, Jason Stephenson2, Alexandra M Hillebrand-Voiculescu3, Yin Chen2 and J Colin Murrell1 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; 2School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK and 3Department of Biospeleology and Karst Edaphobiology, Emil Racovit¸a˘ Institute of Speleology, Bucharest, Romania Movile Cave, Romania, is an unusual underground ecosystem that has been sealed off from the outside world for several million years and is sustained by non-phototrophic carbon fixation. Methane and sulfur-oxidising bacteria are the main primary producers, supporting a complex food web that includes bacteria, fungi and cave-adapted invertebrates. A range of methylotrophic bacteria in Movile Cave grow on one-carbon compounds including methylated amines, which are produced via decomposition of organic-rich microbial mats. The role of methylated amines as a carbon and nitrogen source for bacteria in Movile Cave was investigated using a combination of cultivation studies and DNA stable isotope probing (DNA-SIP) using 13C-monomethylamine (MMA). Two newly developed primer sets targeting the gene for gamma-glutamylmethylamide synthetase (gmaS), the first enzyme of the recently-discovered indirect MMA-oxidation pathway, were applied in functional gene probing. SIP experiments revealed that the obligate methylotroph Methylotenera mobilis is one of the dominant MMA utilisers in the cave. DNA-SIP experiments also showed that a new facultative methylotroph isolated in this study, Catellibacterium sp.
  • Adverse Effect of the Methanotroph Methylocystis Sp. M6 on the Non-Methylotroph Microbacterium Sp

    Adverse Effect of the Methanotroph Methylocystis Sp. M6 on the Non-Methylotroph Microbacterium Sp

    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2018), 28(10), 1706–1715 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1804.04015 Research Article Review jmb Adverse Effect of the Methanotroph Methylocystis sp. M6 on the Non-Methylotroph Microbacterium sp. NM2 So-Yeon Jeong1, Kyung-Suk Cho2, and Tae Gwan Kim1* 1Department of Microbiology, Pusan National University, Pusan 46241, Republic of Korea 2Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea Received: April 12, 2018 Revised: July 19, 2018 Several non-methylotrophic bacteria have been reported to improve the growth and activity of Accepted: August 23, 2018 methanotrophs; however, their interactions remain to be elucidated. We investigated the First published online interaction between Methylocystis sp. M6 and Microbacterium sp. NM2. A batch co-culture August 24, 2018 experiment showed that NM2 markedly increased the biomass and methane removal of M6. *Corresponding author qPCR analysis revealed that NM2 enhanced both the growth and methane-monooxygenase Phone: +82-515102268; gene expression of M6. A fed-batch experiment showed that co-culture was more efficient in Fax: +82-515141778; -1 -1 E-mail: [email protected] removing methane than M6 alone (28.4 vs. 18.8 µmol·l ·d ), although the biomass levels were similar. A starvation experiment for 21 days showed that M6 population remained stable while NM2 population decreased by 66% in co-culture, but the results were opposite in pure cultures, indicating that M6 may cross-feed growth substrates from NM2. These results indicate that M6 apparently had no negative effect on NM2 when M6 actively proliferated with methane. Interestingly, a batch experiment involving a dialysis membrane indicates that physical proximity between NM2 and M6 is required for such biomass and methane removal enhancement.
  • Methylotrophs and Methylotroph Communities

    Methylotrophs and Methylotroph Communities

    caister.com/meth Methylotrophs and Methylotroph Communities https://doi.org/10.21775/9781912530045 Edited by Ludmila Chistoserdova Department of Chemical Engineering University of Washington Seattle WA USA Caister Academic Press Date: 15:45 Thursday 21 March 2019 UNCORRECTED PROOF File: Methylotrophs 3P caister.com/meth Copyright © 2019 Caister Academic Press Norfolk, UK www.caister.com British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 978-1-912530-04-5 (hardback) ISBN: 978-1-912530-05-2 (ebook) Description or mention of instrumentation, software, or other products in this book does not imply endorsement by the author or publisher. The author and publisher do not assume responsibility for the validity of any products or procedures mentioned or described in this book or for the consequences of their use. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. No claim to original U.S. Government works. Cover design adapted with permission from Dr Kelly C. Wrighton, Fort Collins, CO, USA Ebooks Ebooks supplied to individuals are single-user only and must not be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system, or distributed by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, email, internet or otherwise. Ebooks supplied to academic libraries, corporations, government organizations, public libraries, and school libraries are subject to the terms and conditions specified by the supplier. Date: 15:45 Thursday 21 March 2019 UNCORRECTED PROOF File: Methylotrophs 3P caister.com/meth Contents Preface v 1 Methanotrophy – Environmental, Industrial and Medical Applications 1 Jeremy D.
  • Specialized Metabolites from Methylotrophic Proteobacteria Aaron W

    Specialized Metabolites from Methylotrophic Proteobacteria Aaron W

    Specialized Metabolites from Methylotrophic Proteobacteria Aaron W. Puri* Department of Chemistry and the Henry Eyring Center for Cell and Genome Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. *Correspondence: [email protected] htps://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.033.211 Abstract these compounds and strategies for determining Biosynthesized small molecules known as special- their biological functions. ized metabolites ofen have valuable applications Te explosion in bacterial genome sequences in felds such as medicine and agriculture. Con- available in public databases as well as the availabil- sequently, there is always a demand for novel ity of bioinformatics tools for analysing them has specialized metabolites and an understanding of revealed that many bacterial species are potentially their bioactivity. Methylotrophs are an underex- untapped sources for new molecules (Cimerman- plored metabolic group of bacteria that have several cic et al., 2014). Tis includes organisms beyond growth features that make them enticing in terms those traditionally relied upon for natural product of specialized metabolite discovery, characteriza- discovery, and recent studies have shown that tion, and production from cheap feedstocks such examining the biosynthetic potential of new spe- as methanol and methane gas. Tis chapter will cies indeed reveals new classes of compounds examine the predicted biosynthetic potential of (Pidot et al., 2014; Pye et al., 2017). Tis strategy these organisms and review some of the specialized is complementary to synthetic biology approaches metabolites they produce that have been character- focused on activating BGCs that are not normally ized so far. expressed under laboratory conditions in strains traditionally used for natural product discovery, such as Streptomyces (Rutledge and Challis, 2015).
  • Difference Between Chemoorganotrophic and Obligate Autotroph

    Difference Between Chemoorganotrophic and Obligate Autotroph

    Difference Between Chemoorganotrophic And Obligate Autotroph Cary underbidding misanthropically. Ulric often demise parlous when conjugated Ford mollycoddles indistinctly and domes her cyma. Lew often descants unfeignedly when isocheimic Tedie turn-offs designedly and Judaizing her accentors. No mechanism for anaerobic metabolism in conjunction with a common when algae, along the catabolism ofaromatic compounds provide evidence was a difference between trees inferred with the four genera have a consensus approach to The physiological characteristics of use different types of bacteria and their interactions. CO2 stimulates the chemoorganotrophic growth of both ammonia oxidizers and the. Chemoorganotrophic Definition of Chemoorganotrophic by. While Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans growing on FeSO4 would depict an obligate aerobe. A fundamental metabolic distinction is between autotrophs and heterotrophs. Cthe intermediate steps of autotroph and only select multiple curvature and to safely place in each student need to a membrane that can be essentially the deep. The facultative autotroph also oxidizes a ridicule of organic compounds such. Bacterial Metabolism Medical Microbiology NCBI Bookshelf. Interestingly the amount cure the carboxylase in M capsulatus in chemostat culture. Facultative autotroph Can reproduce as autotroph if they must first better as. Learning Objectives Differentiate photoautotrophs from photoheterotrophs. Electron Transport Chain. Ecology of Cyanobacteria II Their Diversity in Space faculty Time. A Photographic Atlas for the Microbiology Laboratory. 5 Algae Biology LibreTexts. MB302 Oregon State University. Autotroph t-trf An organism that manufactures its own value from inorganic substances such high carbon dioxide and ammonia Most autotrophs such clean green plants certain algae and photosynthetic bacteria use ticket for energy. Ment was achieved by comparison by the labour count helpless the pervert of Thiobacillus A2 obtained on.
  • Evolution of Methanotrophy in the Beijerinckiaceae&Mdash

    Evolution of Methanotrophy in the Beijerinckiaceae&Mdash

    The ISME Journal (2014) 8, 369–382 & 2014 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/14 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE The (d)evolution of methanotrophy in the Beijerinckiaceae—a comparative genomics analysis Ivica Tamas1, Angela V Smirnova1, Zhiguo He1,2 and Peter F Dunfield1 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada and 2Department of Bioengineering, School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China The alphaproteobacterial family Beijerinckiaceae contains generalists that grow on a wide range of substrates, and specialists that grow only on methane and methanol. We investigated the evolution of this family by comparing the genomes of the generalist organotroph Beijerinckia indica, the facultative methanotroph Methylocella silvestris and the obligate methanotroph Methylocapsa acidiphila. Highly resolved phylogenetic construction based on universally conserved genes demonstrated that the Beijerinckiaceae forms a monophyletic cluster with the Methylocystaceae, the only other family of alphaproteobacterial methanotrophs. Phylogenetic analyses also demonstrated a vertical inheritance pattern of methanotrophy and methylotrophy genes within these families. Conversely, many lateral gene transfer (LGT) events were detected for genes encoding carbohydrate transport and metabolism, energy production and conversion, and transcriptional regulation in the genome of B. indica, suggesting that it has recently acquired these genes. A key difference between the generalist B. indica and its specialist methanotrophic relatives was an abundance of transporter elements, particularly periplasmic-binding proteins and major facilitator transporters. The most parsimonious scenario for the evolution of methanotrophy in the Alphaproteobacteria is that it occurred only once, when a methylotroph acquired methane monooxygenases (MMOs) via LGT.
  • View PDF Version

    View PDF Version

    RSC Advances View Article Online REVIEW View Journal | View Issue Guidance for engineering of synthetic methylotrophy based on methanol metabolism in Cite this: RSC Adv.,2017,7,4083 methylotrophy Wenming Zhang, Ting Zhang, Sihua Wu, Mingke Wu, Fengxue Xin, Weiliang Dong, Jiangfeng Ma, Min Zhang and Min Jiang* Methanol is increasingly becoming an attractive substrate for production of different metabolites, such as commodity chemicals, and biofuels via biological conversion, due to the increment of annual production capacity and decrement of prices. In recent years, genetic engineering towards native menthol utilizing organisms – methylotrophy has developed rapidly and attracted widespread attention. Therefore, it is vital to elucidate the distinct pathways that involve methanol oxidation, formaldehyde assimilation and disassimilation in the different methylotrophies for future synthetic work. In addition, this will also help to genetically construct some new and non-native methylotrophies. This review summarizes the Received 19th November 2016 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. current knowledge about the methanol metabolism pathways in methylotrophy, discusses and Accepted 26th December 2016 compares different pathways on methanol utilization, and finally presents the strategies to integrate DOI: 10.1039/c6ra27038g the methanol metabolism with other chemicals, biofuels or other high value-added product formation www.rsc.org/advances pathways. 1. Introduction million tons per year and an expected annual growth rate in the range of 10–20%, a methanol-based bioeconomy has been With the rapid growth of the world population and develop- proposed.3 Especially recently, with the rise of the methanol This article is licensed under a ment of industry and society, energy demand is dramatically production process, the price of methanol steadily declined.
  • Bioconversion of Methanol Into Value- Added Chemicals in Native and Synthetic Methylotrophs

    Bioconversion of Methanol Into Value- Added Chemicals in Native and Synthetic Methylotrophs

    Bioconversion of Methanol into Value- added Chemicals in Native and Synthetic Methylotrophs Min Zhang1, Xiao-jie Yuan1, Cong Zhang1, Li-ping Zhu1, Xu-hua Mo1, Wen-jing Chen1 and Song Yang1,2* 1School of Life Science, Qingdao Agricultural University, Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Applied Mycology, and Qingdao International Center on Microbes Utilizing Biogas, Qingdao, China. 2Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. *Correspondence: [email protected] htps://doi.org/10.21775/cimb.033.225 Abstract production of value-added chemicals. In particular, Methanol, commercially generated from methane, methanol is an important one-carbon (C1) feed- is a renewable chemical feedstock that is highly sol- stock that can be generated from either synthesis uble, relatively inexpensive, and easy to handle. Te gas (a mixture of CO and H2) or from biogas, concept of native methylotrophic bacteria serving assuming that large quantities of this feedstock as whole cell catalysts for production of chemicals could be produced at relatively low market price and materials using methanol as a feedstock is (Clomburg et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2018). Methylotrophic highly atractive. In recent years, the available omics bacteria are a diverse group of microbes that can use data for methylotrophic bacteria, especially for reduced C1 compounds such as methanol and Methylobacterium extorquens, the best-characterized methane as sole sources of both energy and carbon model methylotroph, have provided a
  • Revisiting Methylotrophy: the Impact of Lanthanides and Lanthanide-Dependent Enzymes on the Methylotrophic Metabolic Network

    Revisiting Methylotrophy: the Impact of Lanthanides and Lanthanide-Dependent Enzymes on the Methylotrophic Metabolic Network

    REVISITING METHYLOTROPHY: THE IMPACT OF LANTHANIDES AND LANTHANIDE-DEPENDENT ENZYMES ON THE METHYLOTROPHIC METABOLIC NETWORK By Anna Frances Huff A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics – Master of Science 2017 ABSTRACT REVISITING METHYLOTROPHY: THE IMPACT OF LANTHANIDES AND LANTHANIDE-DEPENDENT ENZYMES ON THE METHYLOTROPHIC METABOLIC NETWORK By Anna Frances Huff The recent discovery of lanthanide (Ln3+)-dependent enzymes renewed interest in methylotrophs, although the impact of these enzymes is not understood. In Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, the Ca2+-dependent MxaFI canonically oxidizes methanol to formaldehyde. The tetrahydromethanopterin (H4MPT) pathway oxidizes formaldehyde to formate. Formate is oxidized to CO2 by formate dehydrogenases (FDH) or partially reduced and assimilated. The genome of M. extorquens AM1 codes for three known Ln3+-dependent genes: xoxF, xoxF2, and exaF. XoxF may oxidize both methanol and formaldehyde in some organisms while ExaF demonstrated efficient activity with formaldehyde in the presence of La3+ providing a potential alternative to the H4MPT pathway. RNAseq data provided by Dr. Nathan Good found downregulation of mxa genes and the first gene of the H4MPT pathway, fae, and upregulation of xoxF, xoxF2, and exaF in the presence of La3+ suggesting changes to carbon distribution. I found a sharp decrease in accumulation formaldehyde and fourfold increase in accumulation of formate in the presence of La3+ and hypothesized this was due to the activity of Ln3+ enzymes. I measured the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to methanol metabolism and found decreased sensitivity of a ∆fae mutant from 10 mM to more than 125 mM in the presence of La3+.
  • CO2 Conversion to Methane and Biomass in Obligate Methylotrophic Methanogens in Marine Sediments

    CO2 Conversion to Methane and Biomass in Obligate Methylotrophic Methanogens in Marine Sediments

    The ISME Journal (2019) 13:2107–2119 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0425-9 ARTICLE CO2 conversion to methane and biomass in obligate methylotrophic methanogens in marine sediments 1,2,3 2,4,5 1,3 1 1,2,3 Xiuran Yin ● Weichao Wu ● Mara Maeke ● Tim Richter-Heitmann ● Ajinkya C. Kulkarni ● 1,2 2,4 2,4 1,2 Oluwatobi E. Oni ● Jenny Wendt ● Marcus Elvert ● Michael W. Friedrich Received: 29 January 2019 / Revised: 4 April 2019 / Accepted: 13 April 2019 / Published online: 30 April 2019 © The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access Abstract Methyl substrates are important compounds for methanogenesis in marine sediments but diversity and carbon utilization by methylotrophic methanogenic archaea have not been clarified. Here, we demonstrate that RNA-stable isotope probing (SIP) requires 13C-labeled bicarbonate as co-substrate for identification of methylotrophic methanogens in sediment samples of the Helgoland mud area, North Sea. Using lipid-SIP, we found that methylotrophic methanogens incorporate 60–86% of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) into lipids, and thus considerably more than what can be predicted from known metabolic pathways (~40% contribution). In slurry experiments amended with the marine methylotroph Methanococcoides 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: methylutens, up to 12% of methane was produced from CO2, indicating that CO2-dependent methanogenesis is an alternative methanogenic pathway and suggesting that obligate methylotrophic methanogens grow in fact mixotrophically on methyl compounds and DIC. Although methane formation from methanol is the primary pathway of methanogenesis, the observed high DIC incorporation into lipids is likely linked to CO2-dependent methanogenesis, which was triggered when methane production rates were low.