Identification of Active Methylotroph Populations in an Acidic Forest Soil
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Isolation and Characterization of Achromobacter Sp. CX2 From
Ann Microbiol (2015) 65:1699–1707 DOI 10.1007/s13213-014-1009-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Isolation and characterization of Achromobacter sp. CX2 from symbiotic Cytophagales, a non-cellulolytic bacterium showing synergism with cellulolytic microbes by producing β-glucosidase Xiaoyi Chen & Ying Wang & Fan Yang & Yinbo Qu & Xianzhen Li Received: 27 August 2014 /Accepted: 24 November 2014 /Published online: 10 December 2014 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and the University of Milan 2014 Abstract A Gram-negative, obligately aerobic, non- degradation by cellulase (Carpita and Gibeaut 1993). There- cellulolytic bacterium was isolated from the cellulolytic asso- fore, efficient degradation is the result of multiple activities ciation of Cytophagales. It exhibits biochemical properties working synergistically to efficiently solubilize crystalline cel- that are consistent with its classification in the genus lulose (Sánchez et al. 2004;Lietal.2009). Most known Achromobacter. Phylogenetic analysis together with the phe- cellulolytic organisms produce multiple cellulases that act syn- notypic characteristics suggest that the isolate could be a novel ergistically on native cellulose (Wilson 2008)aswellaspro- species of the genus Achromobacter and designated as CX2 (= duce some other proteins that enhance cellulose hydrolysis CGMCC 1.12675=CICC 23807). The strain CX2 is the sym- (Wang et al. 2011a, b). Synergistic cooperation of different biotic microbe of Cytophagales and produces β-glucosidase. enzymes is a prerequisite for the efficient degradation of cellu- The results showed that the non-cellulolytic Achromobacter lose (Jalak et al. 2012). Both Trichoderma reesi and Aspergillus sp. CX2 has synergistic activity with cellulolytic microbes by niger were co-cultured to increase the levels of different enzy- producing β-glucosidase. -
Multilayered Horizontal Operon Transfers from Bacteria Reconstruct a Thiamine Salvage Pathway in Yeasts
Multilayered horizontal operon transfers from bacteria reconstruct a thiamine salvage pathway in yeasts Carla Gonçalvesa and Paula Gonçalvesa,1 aApplied Molecular Biosciences Unit-UCIBIO, Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal Edited by Edward F. DeLong, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, and approved September 22, 2019 (received for review June 14, 2019) Horizontal acquisition of bacterial genes is presently recognized as nisms presumed to have facilitated a transition from bacterial an important contribution to the adaptation and evolution of operon transcription to eukaryotic-style gene expression were eukaryotic genomes. However, the mechanisms underlying ex- proposed, such as gene fusion giving rise to multifunctional pro- pression and consequent selection and fixation of the prokaryotic teins (6, 23, 24), increase in intergenic distances between genes to genes in the new eukaryotic setting are largely unknown. Here we generate room for eukaryotic promoters, and independent tran- show that genes composing the pathway for the synthesis of the scription producing mRNAs with poly(A) tails have been dem- essential vitamin B1 (thiamine) were lost in an ancestor of a yeast onstrated (22). In the best documented study, which concerns a lineage, the Wickerhamiella/Starmerella (W/S) clade, known to bacterial siderophore biosynthesis operon acquired by yeasts be- harbor an unusually large number of genes of alien origin. The longing to the Wickerhamiella/Starmerella (W/S) clade, the bacte- thiamine pathway was subsequently reassembled, at least twice, rial genes acquired as an operon were shown to be functional (22). by multiple HGT events from different bacterial donors involving Thiamine, commonly known as vitamin B1, is essential for all both single genes and entire operons. -
Exploring Bacteria Diatom Associations Using Single-Cell
Vol. 72: 73–88, 2014 AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published online April 4 doi: 10.3354/ame01686 Aquat Microb Ecol FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Exploring bacteria–diatom associations using single-cell whole genome amplification Lydia J. Baker*, Paul F. Kemp Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, 1950 East West Road, Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education (C-MORE), Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822, USA ABSTRACT: Diatoms are responsible for a large fraction of oceanic and freshwater biomass pro- duction and are critically important for sequestration of carbon to the deep ocean. As with most surfaces present in aquatic systems, bacteria colonize the exterior of diatom cells, and they inter- act with the diatom and each other. The ecology of diatoms may be better explained by conceptu- alizing them as composite organisms consisting of the host cell and its bacterial associates. Such associations could have collective properties that are not predictable from the properties of the host cell alone. Past studies of these associations have employed culture-based, whole-population methods. In contrast, we examined the composition and variability of bacterial assemblages attached to individual diatoms. Samples were collected in an oligotrophic system (Station ALOHA, 22° 45’ N, 158° 00’ W) at the deep chlorophyll maximum. Forty eukaryotic host cells were isolated by flow cytometry followed by multiple displacement amplification, including 26 Thalassiosira spp., other diatoms, dinoflagellates, coccolithophorids, and flagellates. Bacteria were identified by amplifying, cloning, and sequencing 16S rDNA using primers that select against chloroplast 16S rDNA. Bacterial sequences were recovered from 32 of 40 host cells, and from parallel samples of the free-living and particle-associated bacteria. -
Adaptive Laboratory Evolution Enhances Methanol Tolerance and Conversion in Engineered Corynebacterium Glutamicum
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0954-9 OPEN Adaptive laboratory evolution enhances methanol tolerance and conversion in engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum Yu Wang 1, Liwen Fan1,2, Philibert Tuyishime1, Jiao Liu1, Kun Zhang1,3, Ning Gao1,3, Zhihui Zhang1,3, ✉ ✉ 1234567890():,; Xiaomeng Ni1, Jinhui Feng1, Qianqian Yuan1, Hongwu Ma1, Ping Zheng1,2,3 , Jibin Sun1,3 & Yanhe Ma1 Synthetic methylotrophy has recently been intensively studied to achieve methanol-based biomanufacturing of fuels and chemicals. However, attempts to engineer platform micro- organisms to utilize methanol mainly focus on enzyme and pathway engineering. Herein, we enhanced methanol bioconversion of synthetic methylotrophs by improving cellular tolerance to methanol. A previously engineered methanol-dependent Corynebacterium glutamicum is subjected to adaptive laboratory evolution with elevated methanol content. Unexpectedly, the evolved strain not only tolerates higher concentrations of methanol but also shows improved growth and methanol utilization. Transcriptome analysis suggests increased methanol con- centrations rebalance methylotrophic metabolism by down-regulating glycolysis and up- regulating amino acid biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, ribosome biosynthesis, and parts of TCA cycle. Mutations in the O-acetyl-L-homoserine sulfhydrylase Cgl0653 catalyzing formation of L-methionine analog from methanol and methanol-induced membrane-bound transporter Cgl0833 are proven crucial for methanol tolerance. This study demonstrates the importance of -
Polyamine Profiles of Some Members of the Alpha Subclass of the Class Proteobacteria: Polyamine Analysis of Twenty Recently Described Genera
Microbiol. Cult. Coll. June 2003. p. 13 ─ 21 Vol. 19, No. 1 Polyamine Profiles of Some Members of the Alpha Subclass of the Class Proteobacteria: Polyamine Analysis of Twenty Recently Described Genera Koei Hamana1)*,Azusa Sakamoto1),Satomi Tachiyanagi1), Eri Terauchi1)and Mariko Takeuchi2) 1)Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Gunma University, 39 ─ 15 Showa-machi 3 ─ chome, Maebashi, Gunma 371 ─ 8514, Japan 2)Institute for Fermentation, Osaka, 17 ─ 85, Juso-honmachi 2 ─ chome, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka, 532 ─ 8686, Japan Cellular polyamines of 41 newly validated or reclassified alpha proteobacteria belonging to 20 genera were analyzed by HPLC. Acetic acid bacteria belonging to the new genus Asaia and the genera Gluconobacter, Gluconacetobacter, Acetobacter and Acidomonas of the alpha ─ 1 sub- group ubiquitously contained spermidine as the major polyamine. Aerobic bacteriochlorophyll a ─ containing Acidisphaera, Craurococcus and Paracraurococcus(alpha ─ 1)and Roseibium (alpha-2)contained spermidine and lacked homospermidine. New Rhizobium species, including some species transferred from the genera Agrobacterium and Allorhizobium, and new Sinorhizobium and Mesorhizobium species of the alpha ─ 2 subgroup contained homospermidine as a major polyamine. Homospermidine was the major polyamine in the genera Oligotropha, Carbophilus, Zavarzinia, Blastobacter, Starkeya and Rhodoblastus of the alpha ─ 2 subgroup. Rhodobaca bogoriensis of the alpha ─ 3 subgroup contained spermidine. Within the alpha ─ 4 sub- group, the genus Sphingomonas has been divided into four clusters, and species of the emended Sphingomonas(cluster I)contained homospermidine whereas those of the three newly described genera Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis(corresponding to clusters II, III and IV of the former Sphingomonas)ubiquitously contained spermidine. -
Table S4. Phylogenetic Distribution of Bacterial and Archaea Genomes in Groups A, B, C, D, and X
Table S4. Phylogenetic distribution of bacterial and archaea genomes in groups A, B, C, D, and X. Group A a: Total number of genomes in the taxon b: Number of group A genomes in the taxon c: Percentage of group A genomes in the taxon a b c cellular organisms 5007 2974 59.4 |__ Bacteria 4769 2935 61.5 | |__ Proteobacteria 1854 1570 84.7 | | |__ Gammaproteobacteria 711 631 88.7 | | | |__ Enterobacterales 112 97 86.6 | | | | |__ Enterobacteriaceae 41 32 78.0 | | | | | |__ unclassified Enterobacteriaceae 13 7 53.8 | | | | |__ Erwiniaceae 30 28 93.3 | | | | | |__ Erwinia 10 10 100.0 | | | | | |__ Buchnera 8 8 100.0 | | | | | | |__ Buchnera aphidicola 8 8 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pantoea 8 8 100.0 | | | | |__ Yersiniaceae 14 14 100.0 | | | | | |__ Serratia 8 8 100.0 | | | | |__ Morganellaceae 13 10 76.9 | | | | |__ Pectobacteriaceae 8 8 100.0 | | | |__ Alteromonadales 94 94 100.0 | | | | |__ Alteromonadaceae 34 34 100.0 | | | | | |__ Marinobacter 12 12 100.0 | | | | |__ Shewanellaceae 17 17 100.0 | | | | | |__ Shewanella 17 17 100.0 | | | | |__ Pseudoalteromonadaceae 16 16 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pseudoalteromonas 15 15 100.0 | | | | |__ Idiomarinaceae 9 9 100.0 | | | | | |__ Idiomarina 9 9 100.0 | | | | |__ Colwelliaceae 6 6 100.0 | | | |__ Pseudomonadales 81 81 100.0 | | | | |__ Moraxellaceae 41 41 100.0 | | | | | |__ Acinetobacter 25 25 100.0 | | | | | |__ Psychrobacter 8 8 100.0 | | | | | |__ Moraxella 6 6 100.0 | | | | |__ Pseudomonadaceae 40 40 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pseudomonas 38 38 100.0 | | | |__ Oceanospirillales 73 72 98.6 | | | | |__ Oceanospirillaceae -
Taxonomy JN869023
Species that differentiate periods of high vs. low species richness in unattached communities Species Taxonomy JN869023 Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; ACK-M1 JN674641 Bacteria; Bacteroidetes; [Saprospirae]; [Saprospirales]; Chitinophagaceae; Sediminibacterium JN869030 Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; ACK-M1 U51104 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae; Limnohabitans JN868812 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae JN391888 Bacteria; Planctomycetes; Planctomycetia; Planctomycetales; Planctomycetaceae; Planctomyces HM856408 Bacteria; Planctomycetes; Phycisphaerae; Phycisphaerales GQ347385 Bacteria; Verrucomicrobia; [Methylacidiphilae]; Methylacidiphilales; LD19 GU305856 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Alphaproteobacteria; Rickettsiales; Pelagibacteraceae GQ340302 Bacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales JN869125 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae New.ReferenceOTU470 Bacteria; Cyanobacteria; ML635J-21 JN679119 Bacteria; Proteobacteria; Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiales; Comamonadaceae HM141858 Bacteria; Acidobacteria; Holophagae; Holophagales; Holophagaceae; Geothrix FQ659340 Bacteria; Verrucomicrobia; [Pedosphaerae]; [Pedosphaerales]; auto67_4W AY133074 Bacteria; Elusimicrobia; Elusimicrobia; Elusimicrobiales FJ800541 Bacteria; Verrucomicrobia; [Pedosphaerae]; [Pedosphaerales]; R4-41B JQ346769 Bacteria; Acidobacteria; [Chloracidobacteria]; RB41; Ellin6075 -
Supplementary Material 16S Rrna Clone Library
Kip et al. Biogeosciences (bg-2011-334) Supplementary Material 16S rRNA clone library To investigate the total bacterial community a clone library based on the 16S rRNA gene was performed of the pool Sphagnum mosses from Andorra peat, next to S. magellanicum some S. falcatulum was present in this pool and both these species were analysed. Both 16S clone libraries showed the presence of Alphaproteobacteria (17%), Verrucomicrobia (13%) and Gammaproteobacteria (2%) and since the distribution of bacterial genera among the two species was comparable an average was made. In total a 180 clones were sequenced and analyzed for the phylogenetic trees see Fig. A1 and A2 The 16S clone libraries showed a very diverse set of bacteria to be present inside or on Sphagnum mosses. Compared to other studies the microbial community in Sphagnum peat soils (Dedysh et al., 2006; Kulichevskaya et al., 2007a; Opelt and Berg, 2004) is comparable to the microbial community found here, inside and attached on the Sphagnum mosses of the Patagonian peatlands. Most of the clones showed sequence similarity to isolates or environmental samples originating from peat ecosystems, of which most of them originate from Siberian acidic peat bogs. This indicated that similar bacterial communities can be found in peatlands in the Northern and Southern hemisphere implying there is no big geographical difference in microbial diversity in peat bogs. Four out of five classes of Proteobacteria were present in the 16S rRNA clone library; Alfa-, Beta-, Gamma and Deltaproteobacteria. 42 % of the clones belonging to the Alphaproteobacteria showed a 96-97% to Acidophaera rubrifaciens, a member of the Rhodospirullales an acidophilic bacteriochlorophyll-producing bacterium isolated from acidic hotsprings and mine drainage (Hiraishi et al., 2000). -
Isolation, Characterization and Substrate-Transport Studies of a New, Unique Methylotroph
RICE UNIVERSITY ISOLATION, CHARACTERIZATION AND SUBSTRATE-TRANSPORT STUDIES OF A NEW, UNIQUE METHYLOTROPH by Thomas Alan Keuer A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFULLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Master of Science APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: E. Terry Papoutsakis, Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering LarryOf. Mclntire, Professor and Chairman of Chemical Engineering <03^ ' Roger Storck, Professor of Biology Houston, Texas April, 1984 3 1272 00289 0232 ABSTRACT Keuer, Thomas A. M.S. Rice University, April 1984. Isolation, Characterization and Substrate-Transport Studies of a New, Unique Methylotroph. Major Professor: E. T. Papoutsakis. Methylotrophic bacteria which assimilate carbon via the Ribulose Monophosphate Pathway are bioenergetically superior to other methylotrophs. The dehydrogenases which catalyze the oxidation of formaldehyde to formate and formate to CO2 in RMP bacteria produce much of the ATP required for biosynthesis. A strain, designated T15, has been isolated on the basis of high In vitro activities of the above two key enzymes, and has been biochemically characterized. The new strain exhibits high yields (up to 0.63 g cells/g MeOH) and growth rates (up to 0.46 hr“^) in batch culture? however, the yields and growth rates in continuous culture are significantly lower. Study of the transport mechanisms has provided valuable insight into the relationship between substrate uptake and the growth characteristics of T15. Experi¬ ments with radiolabelled substrates have indicated that methanol enters the cells primarily by diffusion? consequently, the bacteria are not able to accumulate methanol internally in order to support efficient Ill continuous growth. Formaldehyde, on the other hand, is accumulated by an active transport system which depends on the A pH component of the membrane proton-motive force. -
Bacterial Metabolism of Methylated Amines and Identification of Novel Methylotrophs in Movile Cave
The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 195–206 & 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bacterial metabolism of methylated amines and identification of novel methylotrophs in Movile Cave Daniela Wischer1, Deepak Kumaresan1,4, Antonia Johnston1, Myriam El Khawand1, Jason Stephenson2, Alexandra M Hillebrand-Voiculescu3, Yin Chen2 and J Colin Murrell1 1School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; 2School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK and 3Department of Biospeleology and Karst Edaphobiology, Emil Racovit¸a˘ Institute of Speleology, Bucharest, Romania Movile Cave, Romania, is an unusual underground ecosystem that has been sealed off from the outside world for several million years and is sustained by non-phototrophic carbon fixation. Methane and sulfur-oxidising bacteria are the main primary producers, supporting a complex food web that includes bacteria, fungi and cave-adapted invertebrates. A range of methylotrophic bacteria in Movile Cave grow on one-carbon compounds including methylated amines, which are produced via decomposition of organic-rich microbial mats. The role of methylated amines as a carbon and nitrogen source for bacteria in Movile Cave was investigated using a combination of cultivation studies and DNA stable isotope probing (DNA-SIP) using 13C-monomethylamine (MMA). Two newly developed primer sets targeting the gene for gamma-glutamylmethylamide synthetase (gmaS), the first enzyme of the recently-discovered indirect MMA-oxidation pathway, were applied in functional gene probing. SIP experiments revealed that the obligate methylotroph Methylotenera mobilis is one of the dominant MMA utilisers in the cave. DNA-SIP experiments also showed that a new facultative methylotroph isolated in this study, Catellibacterium sp. -
Adverse Effect of the Methanotroph Methylocystis Sp. M6 on the Non-Methylotroph Microbacterium Sp
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2018), 28(10), 1706–1715 https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1804.04015 Research Article Review jmb Adverse Effect of the Methanotroph Methylocystis sp. M6 on the Non-Methylotroph Microbacterium sp. NM2 So-Yeon Jeong1, Kyung-Suk Cho2, and Tae Gwan Kim1* 1Department of Microbiology, Pusan National University, Pusan 46241, Republic of Korea 2Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea Received: April 12, 2018 Revised: July 19, 2018 Several non-methylotrophic bacteria have been reported to improve the growth and activity of Accepted: August 23, 2018 methanotrophs; however, their interactions remain to be elucidated. We investigated the First published online interaction between Methylocystis sp. M6 and Microbacterium sp. NM2. A batch co-culture August 24, 2018 experiment showed that NM2 markedly increased the biomass and methane removal of M6. *Corresponding author qPCR analysis revealed that NM2 enhanced both the growth and methane-monooxygenase Phone: +82-515102268; gene expression of M6. A fed-batch experiment showed that co-culture was more efficient in Fax: +82-515141778; -1 -1 E-mail: [email protected] removing methane than M6 alone (28.4 vs. 18.8 µmol·l ·d ), although the biomass levels were similar. A starvation experiment for 21 days showed that M6 population remained stable while NM2 population decreased by 66% in co-culture, but the results were opposite in pure cultures, indicating that M6 may cross-feed growth substrates from NM2. These results indicate that M6 apparently had no negative effect on NM2 when M6 actively proliferated with methane. Interestingly, a batch experiment involving a dialysis membrane indicates that physical proximity between NM2 and M6 is required for such biomass and methane removal enhancement. -
Widespread Soil Bacterium That Oxidizes Atmospheric Methane
Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane Alexander T. Tveita,1, Anne Grethe Hestnesa,1, Serina L. Robinsona, Arno Schintlmeisterb, Svetlana N. Dedyshc, Nico Jehmlichd, Martin von Bergend,e, Craig Herboldb, Michael Wagnerb, Andreas Richterf, and Mette M. Svenninga,2 aDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsoe, Norway; bCenter of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; cWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia; dDepartment of Molecular Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; eFaculty of Life Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany; and fCenter of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria Edited by Mary E. Lidstrom, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved March 7, 2019 (received for review October 22, 2018) The global atmospheric level of methane (CH4), the second most as-yet-uncultured clades within the Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria important greenhouse gas, is currently increasing by ∼10 million (16–18) which were designated as upland soil clusters α and γ tons per year. Microbial oxidation in unsaturated soils is the only (USCα and USCγ, respectively). Interest in soil atmMOB has known biological process that removes CH4 from the atmosphere, increased significantly since then because they are responsible but so far, bacteria that can grow on atmospheric CH4 have eluded for the only known biological removal of atmospheric CH4 all cultivation efforts.