DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission to Ministers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission to Ministers From: Marine Scotland Licensing Operations Team Marine Scotland 25 March 2019 Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure and Connectivity APPLICATIONS FOR CONSENT UNDER SECTION 36 AND FOR A DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 36A OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 (AS AMENDED) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF AN OFFSHORE GENERATING STATION, INCH CAPE OFFSHORE WIND FARM, APPROXIMATELY 15 – 22 KM EAST OFF THE ANGUS COASTLINE 1. Purpose 1.1 To seek your determination on an application submitted by Inch Cape Offshore Limited (Company Number SC373173) (“ICOL” or “the Company”) for consent under section 36 (“s.36”) of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) (“the Electricity Act 1989”) to construct and operate an offshore generating station, comprising up to 72 wind turbine generators (“WTGs”), with a combined maximum generating capacity of around 700MW (“the Application”) and for a declaration under section 36A (“s.36A”) of the Electricity Act 1989 to extinguish public rights of navigation so far as they pass through those places within the territorial sea where structures forming part of the offshore wind farm are to be located. 1.2 The Application has been submitted for your determination, based on advice from the Cabinet, Parliament and Governance Division. Due to impacts on the St. Abb’s Head to Fast Castle Special Protection Area (“SPA”), which is within Mr Wheelhouse’s constituency, Scottish Natural Heritage have objected to the Application. As such, there could be a perceived conflict of interest should Mr Wheelhouse determine the Application. 2. Priority 2.1 Routine. 3. Background 3.1 The Company currently holds a s.36 consent (“the Original Consent”) and marine licences (which the Scottish Ministers granted in October 2014) for an offshore wind farm development within the same boundary as the current Application. 3.2 The Company has made the current Application in order to take advantage of new developments in relation to offshore wind technology, meaning turbine numbers can be reduced, leading to a reduction in the associated environmental impacts (when compared to the Original Consent). 1 4. Description of the Application and Site 4.1 On 15 August 2018, the Company submitted the Application to construct and operate the Inch Cape Offshore Wind Farm (“the Development”), approximately 15-22km east off the Angus coastline. The Application was supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment report (“EIA Report) and Habitat Regulations Appraisal report (“HRA Report”). 4.2 The Application is for the construction and operation of an offshore energy generating station, with a maximum generating capacity of around 700MW and comprising up to 72 WTGs and associated offshore transmission infrastructure. A full description of the Development is set out in Annex C. 4.3 The location and boundary of the Development site is shown in Annex C, Figure 1. This location was selected based upon: wind resource and energy yield, environmental receptors (incorporating ornithology and marine mammals and landscape/seascape and visual impact), grid connectivity, suitable port availability, geotechnical conditions and foundation design options. 4.4 It is proposed than an offshore electricity export cable corridor approximately 1,400 metres at its widest point, reducing to about 250 metres in shallower areas, will contain up to two cables that will transmit the electricity generated by the turbines to the onshore transformer location, to be located at the site of the Cockenzie Power Station, East Lothian. The proposed cables will each measure not more than 83.3km in length. The cable burial method and/or scour protection requirements will be finalised when the layout is confirmed. 5. Key considerations 5.1 In light of the legislative and regulatory background, the results of the consultation exercise and the supporting information submitted as part of the Application, including the EIA Report, the key considerations in relation to the determination of this Application are set out at Annex C, section 9. 5.2 The Appropriate Assessment (“AA”), as set out in Annex B, concluded that the Development would not adversely affect the integrity of any European offshore marine site or European protected site, either alone or in- combination with other plans or projects. 5.3 This Application should be considered in the context of the existing s.36 consents and new applications for s.36 consent in relation to offshore wind farms within the Firth of Forth and Firth of Tay region. These comprise: the Original Consent; the previous consent for Neart na Gaoithe offshore wind farm (granted October 2014) and the existing consent for the Neart na Gaoithe offshore wind farm (Revised Design) (granted December 2018); the existing consents for the Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo offshore wind farms (granted October 2014) and the applications for new consents in respect of the Seagreen Alpha and Seagreen Bravo offshore wind farms (submitted September 2018). Combinations of these consents are referred to as the “Forth and Tay Developments” within this submission. For the 2 ornithology in-combination assessment in the AA, the Worst Case Scenario (“WCS”) is considered to be the Development in-combination with the s.36 consents granted in 2014 for the NnGOWL Development and the Seagreen Developments. 5.4 Marine Scotland Licensing Operations Team (“MS-LOT”) considers that the key issues identified have been resolved, mitigated and/or successfully addressed through the use of conditions. All legislative requirements have been complied with throughout the determination process and policy documents identified are considered to be broadly supportive of the Development. 5.5 Further, MS-LOT concludes that the Company has had regard to the potential interference of recognised sea lanes essential to international and national navigation. Any obstruction or danger to navigation has been addressed through specific consent conditions at Annex C. The s.36A declaration to extinguish public rights of navigation is included at Annex D. 6. Key issues raised by consultees 6.1 A full summary of the consultation exercise is set out in Annex C, at sections 4, 5 and 6. The key issues raised by consultees were as follows: Potential impacts on seabirds, and in particular the qualifying interests of the Forth Islands SPA, Fowlsheugh SPA and St Abb’s Head to Fast Castle SPA, as a result of the Development in-combination with the other Forth and Tay Developments; Potential impacts on marine mammals; Potential impacts on diadromous fish; Potential impacts on commercial fisheries; Seascape, landscape and visual potential impacts arising as a result of the Development, particularly in-combination with the other Forth and Tay Developments; Potential impacts on cultural heritage receptors; and Potential impacts on air defence radar. 7. Maintained objections 7.1 Detail on the means by which the concerns and objections set out in this section have been considered and addressed are set out in Annex C. 7.2 Scottish Natural Heritage (“SNH”) maintains its objection relating to the impacts on the qualifying interests of the Forth Islands SPA, Fowlsheugh SPA and St. Abb’s Head to Fast Castle SPA arising from the Development in- combination with the Forth and Tay Developments. 3 7.3 The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Scotland (“RSPB Scotland”) maintains its objection due to its concerns regarding the predicted impacts on the protected seabird populations arising from the Development in isolation and in-combination with other Forth and Tay Developments. 7.4 The Ministry of Defence (“MOD”) maintains its objection regarding unacceptable interference to Air Traffic Control (“ATC”) radar, used by Leuchars Airfield, and to Air Defence Radar at Remote Radar Head (“RRH”) Buchan and Brizlee Wood. The MOD is not currently in a position to agree to suspensive conditions at this time due to the impacts on Air Defence. 7.5 The River Tweed Commission (“RTC”) and Tay District Salmon Fisheries Board (“Tay DSFB”) maintain their objections due to its concerns over lack of information about migration routes for diadromous fish, lack of consideration of sea trout and concern as to whether the turbine bases could result in increased predation of diadromous fish by seals. 7.6 The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (“SFF”) maintains its objection to the Development. SFF objects on the basis of impacts arising during the construction and operational phases of the Development on a range of fishing operations. SFF further objects to the socio-economic assessment presented in the EIA Report. Similar concerns regarding impacts on fishing operations were raised by Port Seton Fishermen (“PSF”), Firth of Forth Lobster Hatchery and the Dunbar Fishermen’s Association (“DFA”). 7.7 Aberdeenshire Council confirmed its objection that the Development would not comply with Policy E1 of the Aberdeenshire Local Development Plan 2017 on the basis that SNH advised that there would be an adverse effect on the site integrity of the Fowlsheugh SPA in respect of the black-legged kittiwake and razorbill qualifying interests. 8. Advice on whether to cause a Public Local Inquiry (“PLI”) to be held 8.1 If a s.36 application contains an onshore element of an offshore generating station, a maintained objection from a planning authority will automatically trigger a PLI, which will be confined to the onshore element of the application. Paragraph 7A(7) of Schedule 8 to the Electricity Act 1989 gives the Scottish Ministers powers of direction in relation to the scope of any PLI. 8.2 In this case there is no onshore element relating to the s.36 application, therefore there is no automatic requirement to cause a PLI to be held. 8.3 The circumstances of the case are such that there is no statutory requirement under Paragraph 2(2) of Schedule 8 to the Electricity Act 1989 for the Scottish Ministers to cause a PLI to be held. The decision to hold a PLI in this case is entirely at the discretion of the Scottish Ministers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Site & Surroundings
    SITE & SURROUNDINGS The Story of Cockenzie & Port Seton Cockenzie and Port Seton are virtually horse-drawn railway carrying coal from One of the more obvious recent synonymous. The two settlements have the pits around Tranent to the harbour at developments took place in the 1960s long merged into one another and on Cockenzie. when the Cockenzie Power Station was maps the whole phrase is used as a single built on the coastal site of a disused name. These days it is fair to think of them During the 1745 Jacobite uprising the coal mine just to the west of Cockenzie as one large village with two harbours: Battle of Prestonpans took place a mile and Port Seton. The site was chosen to Port Seton harbour being half a mile to the south of Cockenzie and close to the line of make use of the excellent coal supplies east of Cockenzie harbour. the waggonway. History was made when available locally, the good rail links, and the waggonway was used to transport the availability of seawater for cooling: Cockenzie was the first to be established. troops to the battle, marking the railway's hence the absence of cooling towers. The There had probably been a village around first ever use in warfare. Power Station was built partly on the site its natural harbour long before it was of the former Preston Links Colliery, with chartered as a burgh by James VI in Cockenzie was also home for many years northern elements of the site reclaimed 1591. It then grew as a convenient means to boatyards producing fishing vessels from the Firth of Forth to facilitate of exporting the coal being unearthed and yachts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Marine Protected Area Project – Developing the Evidence Base for Impact Assessments and the Sustainability Appraisal Final Report
    Planning Scotland’s Seas The Scottish Marine Protected Area Project – Developing the Evidence Base for Impact Assessments and the Sustainability Appraisal Final Report Marine Scotland The Scottish Marine Protected Area Project – Developing the Evidence Base for Impact Assessments and the Sustainability Appraisal Final Report Date: July 2013 Project Ref: R/4136/1 Report No: R.2097 © ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Version Details of Change Date 1.0 Draft 29.04.2013 2.0 Draft 15.05.2013 3.0 Final 07.06.2013 4.0 Final 28.06.2013 5.0 Final 01.07.2013 6.0 Final 05.07.2013 Document Authorisation Signature Date Project Manager: S F Walmsley PP 05.07.2013 Quality Manager: C E Brown 05.07.2013 Project Director: S C Hull 05.07.2013 ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd ABPmer is certified by: Quayside Suite, Medina Chambers, Town Quay, Southampton, Hampshire SO14 2AQ Tel: +44 (0) 23 8071 1840 Fax: +44 (0) 23 8071 1841 Web: www.abpmer.co.uk Email: [email protected] All images copyright ABPmer apart from front cover (wave, anemone, bird) and policy & management (rockpool) Andy Pearson www.oceansedgepzhotography.co.uk The Scottish Marine Protected Area Project – Developing the Evidence Base for Impact Assessments and the Sustainability Appraisal Summary Introduction The Marine (Scotland) Act and the UK Marine and Coastal Access Act contain provisions for the designation of a network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Scottish territorial and offshore waters in order to protect marine biodiversity and geodiversity and contribute to a UK and international network of MPAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007
    Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Index Page number Welcome 2 Performance Summary 2007 3 Managing our Responsibilities Our Approach 6 Governance 7 Environment 8 Stakeholder Engagement 11 Scope 12 Benchmarking and Recognition 13 Our 12 Impacts 15 Provision of Energy 16 Health and Safety 25 Customer Experience 35 Climate Change and Emissions to Air 43 Waste and Resource Use 52 Biodiversity 62 Sites, Siting and Infrastructure 70 Employment Experience 75 Customers with Special Circumstances 88 Community 94 Procurement 107 Economic 113 Assurance Statement 116 Page 1 of 118 www.scottishpower.com/CorporateResponsibility.asp Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Welcome 2007 was a landmark year for our business with the successful integration of ScottishPower and IBERDROLA. The new enlarged IBERDROLA Group ended 2007 as one of the worlds largest electricity companies by market capitalisation. Through the friendly integration, now successfully completed, we have reinforced our shared commitment to Corporate Responsibility. Our reporting year has been aligned to IBERDROLA so going forward we will be working on a calendar year basis. Achieving Scottish Business in the Community Large Company of the Year in 2007 was an important endorsement for ScottishPowers work and to our commitment to environmental and social issues. During 2007, we have announced significant investments in sustainable generation projects and environmental technologies; increased our 2010 target for delivery of wind energy projects in the UK to 1,200 MW and established partnerships that will help secure Scotlands place as the world leader in marine energy. In addition, we announced the UKs largest energy crop project and embarked on a major study into cleaner coal generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Cockenzie Power Station & Surrounding Area
    Former Cockenzie Power Station & Surrounding Area Appendices August 2017 CONTENTS Appendices Appendix A: Socio-economic Baseline Appendix B: Consultation Report (Stage 1) Appendix C: Consultation Report (Stage 2) Appendix D: Economic Impacts Appendix E: High Level Order of Cost Estimate APPENDIX A: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE Appendix A Socio-economic Baseline A.1.1 This section considers key socioeconomic indicators for the study area, drawing out potential opportunities and challenges for the development of the Cockenzie Masterplan. Study Area A.1.2 For the purposes of this report the study area has been assumed to include the site previously occupied by the Cockenzie Power Station (‘the site’) and the adjoining residential settlements of Cockenzie, Port Seton and Prestonpans. Figure A.1 Socio-economic Study Area A.1.3 The socioeconomic characteristics of the study area are compared with a number of wider areas, namely the areas within 30 min, 45min, and 60 min drive time from the study area, East Lothian, SESplan1, and Scotland. This not only provides contextual information on the study area relative to these wider areas, but also allows for the calculation of additionality effects of economic impacts during the impact assessment stage. Methodology and Data Sources A.1.4 Data underpinning the socioeconomic baseline was drawn primarily from Experian data forecasts, modelled on 2011 Census-based current year (2017) estimates across a wide range of indicators. This was modelled using MMG software on a variety of drive time (30 min, 45 min, and 60 min) and administrative (East Lothian, SESplan, and Scotland) boundaries. All additional data sources are referenced throughout this section.
    [Show full text]
  • Lothian NHS Board Waverley Gate 2-4 Waterloo Place Edinburgh EH1 3EG
    Lothian NHS Board Waverley Gate 2-4 Waterloo Place Edinburgh EH1 3EG Telephone: 0131 536 9000 www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk Date: 05/04/2019 Your Ref: Our Ref: 3431 Enquiries to : Richard Mutch Extension: 35687 Direct Line: 0131 465 5687 [email protected] Dear FREEDOM OF INFORMATION – GP CATCHMENT I write in response to your request for information in relation to GP catchment areas within Lothian. I have been provided with information to help answer your request by the NHS Lothian Primary Care Contract Team. Question: Can you please provide an updated version of the Lothians GP catchment areas list as found at https://www.nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk/YourRights/FOI/RequestAndResponseRegister/2012/320 0.pdf Answer: Practice Practice Name wef Practice Boundary No 70075 Braids Medical 27/09/18 On the northern boundary – the railway line running Practice through Morningside Station. On the west – Colinton 6 Camus Avenue Road where it crosses the railway continuing into Edinburgh EH10 Colinton Mains Drive to the Tesco Roundabout, then 6QT continuing south south-east across country to the Dreghorn Link to the City By-Pass. On the south – cuts across country from the Dreghorn Link to Swanston Golf Course and around the south perimeter of Swanston Golf Course and Swanston village cutting across country in a south easterly direction to meet the Lothian Burn at Hillend Car Park and along the access road until it meets the Bigger Road (A702). Continuing south on the A702 until the triple junction where the A702 meets the A703 and Old Pentland Road, across country in a straight line, crossing the Edinburgh City Bypass (A720) passing the east end of Winton Loan and north by Morton House to Frogston Road West.
    [Show full text]
  • (For Official Use Only) PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1188 Should You Wish to Submit a Public Petition for Consideration by the Public P
    (For official use only) PUBLIC PETITION NO. PE1188 Should you wish to submit a public petition for consideration by the Public Petitions Committee please refer to the guidance leaflet How to submit a public petition and the Guidance Notes at the back of this form. 1. NAME OF PRINCIPAL PETITIONER Nick Dekker 2. TEXT OF PETITION Nick Dekker calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to investigate the circumstances whereby it agreed that 60 hydro-power stations could be accredited for subsidy under the Renewables Obligation scheme and that generation capacity could be cut to below the 20megawatt qualification threshold at others to enable accreditation and whether, in the interests of electricity consumers, it will rescind these accreditations. 3. ACTION TAKEN TO RESOLVE ISSUES OF CONCERN BEFORE SUBMITTING THE PETITION I have contacted and have been in correspondence with AuditScotland, OFGEM, Scottish & Southern Energy PLC and ScottishPower PLC. Alex Neil MSP also corresponded with Scottish & Southern Energy. 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See— “The war on climate change – A licence to print money?” “Subsidies and Subterfuge – Hydro-power and the Renewables Obligation” (also on www.swap.org.uk) “ROCs earned by Alcan, SSE and ScottishPower from 'old build' hydro, April 2002 to December 2007” (a report by the petitioners); “Renewable Energy Data for Scotland (Hydro), May 2008” Correspondence generally pertinent to the petition but esp to Question 3 OFGEM’s “Annual Reports on the Renewables Obligation” 2004 to 2008; Press releases and other material referred to in “The war on climate change – a licence to print money?” and elsewhere 5.
    [Show full text]
  • View Responsibility Report
    Sustainability Report / 2015 Sustainability Report / 2 015 External Evaluations of the Iberdrola Group Indices Iberdrola’s and studies ranking Total score: 87 points. Only European electric company to have been included in all 16 editions of the index. Only Spanish electric company among the world’s 100 most sustainable companies. Five consecutive years on the index. First utility with nuclear assets selected for the index. Climate Disclosure Leadership Index (CDLI). Score: 100 points. Climate Performance Leadership Index A. Iberdrola one of the developers. Iberdrola selected. Iberdrola selected. Sustainability Yearbook 2015: “Silver Class” in the electricity sector. Most sustainable Spanish utility and fourth most sustainable utility in the world. Leader among Spanish utilities: electricity, gas, and water. Leading company on the Ibex 35 in Transparency ranking 2014. Contents Presentation 8 Part I. General Standard Disclosures 10 1. Strategy and Analysis 11 2. Organisational Profile 18 3. Material Aspects and Boundaries 37 4. Stakeholder Engagement 47 5. Report Profile 52 6. Governance 54 7. Ethics and Integrity 70 Part II. Specific Standard Disclosures 74 General Management Approach 75 A. Economic Dimension 78 B. Environmental Dimension 100 C. Social Dimension 146 C1. Labour Practices and Decent Work 147 C2. Human Rights 168 C3. Society 176 C4. Product Responsibility 205 Annexes 222 Annex 1 GRI Content Index 223 Annex 2 Content Index in Relation to the Principles of the Global Compact 233 Annex 3 Green Bond Returns Report 234 External Independent Assurance Report on Green Bond 238 Annex 4 External Independent Assurance Report 240 Presentation 8 Presentation / Sustainability Report 2015 9 Presentation As is the custom each year, Iberdrola hereby presents its Sustainability Report, in this case for financial year 2015, which was approved by its Board of Directors at its meeting of 23 February 2016, after a report from the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee of the Board of Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • MLDP Monitoring Statement
    East Ayrshire Council Minerals Local Development Plan Monitoring Statement JUNE 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Purpose 4 1.2 Existing Development Plan 4 1.3 Future Development Plan 4 1.4 State of the Environment Report 4 1.5 Content 5 2 Changes to national policy as it affects minerals and considers new technologies 6 2.1 The National Planning Framework (NPF3) (2014) 6 2.2 Electricity Generation Policy Statement (EGPS) (2013) 6 2.3 Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) (2014) 7 2.4 Environmental Assessment 8 2.5 The Management of Extractive Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2010 8 3 Summary of mineral extraction activity that has taken place over the monitoring periods and projected demand 9 3.1 Minerals Development Activity excluding coal 9 3.2 Landbank of Permitted Reserves 11 3.4 Coal Development Activity 16 4 Changes in the opencast coal extraction industry 22 4.1 Market Volatility 22 MINERALS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 MONITORING STATEMENT 4.2 Closure of coal-burning power stations and the requirement for Carbon Capture and Storage 22 4.3 Environmental degradation 23 5 The legacy of unrestored land 24 6 Technological advances in other industries 29 6.1 Unconventional Oil and Gas 29 6.2 Recycled Aggregates 33 7 Assessment of Policies 35 7.1 The 2003 Adopted East Ayrshire Opencast Coal Subject Plan 35 7.2 The extent to which the strategies of the EALP 2010 have been successful in relation to other minerals and whether they merit being carried forward to the new minerals local development plan. 44 7.3 An Assessment of the fulfilment of EALP 2010
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Into the Recovery of Heat from Power Generation in Scotland
    A study into the recovery of heat from power generation in Scotland Report to the Scottish Government A study into the recovery of heat from power generation in Scotland Title A study into the recovery of heat from power generation in Scotland Customer The Scottish Government Customer reference Confidentiality, Copyright Scottish Government. copyright and reproduction File reference ED56538 Reference number ED56538- Final Report Issue 1 AEA Group Colin McNaught AEA, Glengarnock Technology Centre Caledonian Road Lochshore Business Park Glengarnock KA14 3DD t: 0870 190 6191 f: 0870 190 5151 e. [email protected] AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Author Name Colin McNaught, Evan Williams, Jeremy Stambaugh, Ben Kiff Approved by Name Mahmoud Abu-ebid Signature Date 5 September 2011 AEA A study into the recovery of heat from power generation in Scotland Executive Summary Overview This research project commissioned by the Scottish Government and delivered by AEA, develops an analysis of the financial and technical potential for recovering heat from large scale power stations in Scotland to provide heating through local district heat networks. The study examines the potential for recovery of heat from four sites used for large scale fossil fuel power generation: • Longannet; • Cockenzie; • Hunterston; and • Peterhead. This study then examines the policies that could help make heat recovery a financially viable option. Heat Supply and Demand The study considers how four new power stations at each of these sites could provide heat to anchor heat loads within an initial catchment area of 30 km around each site.
    [Show full text]
  • Lgc/S3/10/18/A Local Government And
    LGC/S3/10/18/A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITIES COMMITTEE AGENDA 18th Meeting, 2010 (Session 3) Wednesday 23 June 2010 The Committee will meet at 10.00 am in Committee Room 1. 1. Decision on taking business in private: The Committee will decide whether to take items 11 and 12 in private. The Committee will also decide whether its consideration of the evidence heard and its draft report on the Property Factors (Scotland) Bill should be taken in private at future meetings. 2. National Planning Framework 2: The Committee will take evidence on the Scottish Government NPF2 Progress Report from— Stewart Stevenson MSP, Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Climate Change, Graeme Purves, Assistant Chief Planner, Emma Hay, Principal Planner, and Rebecca Frost, Student Planner, Directorate for the Built Environment, Scottish Government. 3. Subordinate legislation: The Committee will take evidence on the draft Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications) (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2010 from— Stewart Stevenson MSP, Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Climate Change, Graeme Purves, Assistant Chief Planner, Sam Anwar, Team Leader, and David Reekie, Policy Officer, Planning, Legislation and Performance Team, Scottish Government. 4. Subordinate legislation: Stewart Stevenson MSP (Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Climate Change) to move S3M-6479— That the Local Government and Communities Committee recommends that the draft Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications)
    [Show full text]
  • System Control Boundaries and Control Boundary Procedures
    This document is not controlled. The current version is held on the Energy Networks Intranet. SYSTEM CONTROL BOUNDARIES & OPSAF-11-030 CONTROL BOUNDARY PROCEDURES Issue No. 4 1 SCOPE This document details the control boundaries and the procedures to be adopted for achieving Safety from the System and the issue of Safety Documents and Keys when working on or testing Plant and HV Apparatus at the control boundaries. Plant and Apparatus ownership is detailed in the Site Responsibility Schedules. This document should be read in conjunction with: PSSI 17 – “Work On or Testing of Customers’ Installations and the Control of Safety from the System at ScottishPower/Customer Boundaries”, and PSMSP 5.2 - “Responsibilities of Control Persons and Authorised Persons who act as Control Persons”. 2 ISSUE RECORD This is a controlled maintained document. All copies printed via the Intranet or photocopied will be deemed uncontrolled. Issue Date Issue No Author Amendment Details Oct 98 1 Raymond Nelson Initial Issue May 2001 2 Allan MacLeod & 1. Inclusion of RISSP Procedure in Dave McKay 2. Review of Control Boundaries and Interface Procedures Feb 2005 3 Fiona Muir, 1. Transfer of Control Authority Allan MacLeod & Procedure. Raymond Nelson 2. RISSP Procedure for NMC Scotland 3. Control Boundaries Updated 4. Inclusion of Work on Transmission Crossings Over Distribution HV Circuits 5. PSMC name updated to NMC Aug 2005 4 Raymond Nelson Section 7, Par 7.4 &7.5 – Clarification of Points of Isolation that can be quoted on Safety Documents : 43 Page Document 3 ISSUE AUTHORITY Author Owner Issue Authority Fiona Muir, Allan MacLeod Raymond Nelson Paul Brown & Raymond Nelson Operational Risk manager Safety Quality & Risk Director ……………………… © SP Power Systems Limited -1- PSMSP 4.5 This document is not controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Welcome 5. Sense of About this Report Our Year in Summary – Highlights of 2009 Belonging & Trust Performance Highlights Our People About Us Our Communities Our Strategy Key Statistic 2. Corporate Ethics & 6. Safety & Reliability Responsibility Governance & Management Occupational Health Governance Health and Safety Standards How We Manage CSR Accidents & Injuries Stakeholder Engagement Safety Programmes Benchmarking and Recognition Plant Reliability & Energy Security Energy Security 3. Economic Results Key Financial Results 2009 Investment and Pricing Customer Bills 7. Customer Focus Customer Profile Ofgem Energy Supply Probe Pricing and Product Innovation 4. Respect for the Sales and Marketing Customer Information Environment Customer Service Environmental Policy Help for Vulnerable Customers Climate Change Acidification & Air Quality Resource Use and Waste Water 8. Assurance & Biodiversity Environmental Management Information Sites and Infrastructure Welcome A Message From Ann Loughrey, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility Welcome to our Corporate Social Responsibility Annual Review for 2009. The year was a challenging one as the UK suffered the effects of the economic recession – but despite this, we made huge progress in a number of areas. One of the most exciting developments was our progress towards making Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) a realistic option in the fight against global climate change. This technology could have the potential to capture around 90% of the CO2 produced from burning coal to produce electricity and transport it by pipeline for long-term geological storage under the North Sea. During the year Longannet Power Station became the first major power station in the UK to capture CO2 from its flue gases, signalling a major step forward in this clean coal technology.
    [Show full text]