DOCSLIB.ORG

Theme, Division and Related Group Panels the Following Groups Organize and Sponsor Panels, Roundtables and Plenaries at the APSA Annual Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Theme, Division and Related Group Panels The following groups organize and sponsor panels, roundtables and plenaries at the APSA Annual Meeting. Theme panels: Organized by Annual Meeting program chairs, focusing on broad topics related to the meeting theme or issues of wide interest to the Association. A “T” precedes the title of theme panels in this program. Division panels: Organized and overseen by Annual Meeting division chairs who also serve as members of the program committee. APSA organizes the annual meeting into 49 divisions, 41 of which align with APSA Organized Sections. APSA allocates panels to each division according to a formula based on prior year attendance and proposal submission rates. The following pages list division panels ordered by division number. Related group panels: Organized by independent professional groups, called “Related Groups,” and invited by APSA to organize scholarly panels during the annual meeting. Several Some related groups only meet at the APSA Annual Meeting (e.g. conference groups) and some are independent associations. Related groups must demonstrate to APSA that they have a persistent organizational structure and membership threshold to be eligible to host panels at the meeting. The following pages list related group panels ordered by related group name. Committee panels: Organized by APSA committees to address professional issues in the discipline and related to the committee’s responsibilities. See the “Committee Sponsored Panels Events” entry in the Table of Contents for the location of the committee panel listings. 190 Theme, Division and Related Group Panels Related Groups Association of Chinese Political Studies Chair: Dali L. Yang, University of Chicago African Politics Conference Group Panel 1 CHINA, THE UNITED STATES, AND Sat 8:00 am Chair: Peter A. VonDoepp, University of Vermont GLOBAL ORDER Susanna D. Wing, Haverford College Alice Kang, University of Wisconsin, Madison Panel 2 GLOBALIZATION AND THE Fri 2:00 pm Mi Yung Yoon, Hanover College CHINESE REGULATORY STATE Panel 1 DEMOCRATIZATION, STATE Sat 8:00 am STRENGTH AND ECONOMIC Association of Korean Political Studies in North America DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN Chair: Jae-Jung Suh, Johns Hopkins University AFRICA: NEW EMPIRICAL AND CONCEPTUAL HORIZONS Panel 1 IDENTIFYING KOREA, OTHERING Thu 10:15 am Co-sponsored by 12-40 NEIGHBORS Panel 2 AFRICAN LEADERSHIP ROLES AND Fri 10:15 am Panel 2 KOREA’S RESPONSES TO Fri 8:00 am THE ROLE OF THE CIVIC IN A GLOBALIZATION CONTEXT OF POLITICAL CHANGE Panel 3 CONSOLIDATING DEMOCRACY IN Sat 4:15 pm Related Group Panels Panel 3 ETHNICITY, RELIGION AND Sat 2:00 pm SOUTH KOREA? TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY IN AFRICAN POLITICS Co-sponsored by 12-52 Walter Bagehot Research Council on National Sovereignty Chair: Frank P. Le Veness, St. John’s University Matthew A. Pauley, Manhattanville College Aging Policy and Politics Group Joseph Prud’homme, Christopher Newport University Chair: Andrea Louise Campbell, Massachusetts Institue of Technology Cynthia Massie Mara, Penn State Panel 1 CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS OF Sun 10:15 am THE PRESIDENCY: HISTORICAL Panel 1 CROSSNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES Thu 10:15 am AND THEORETICAL ON AGING POLITICS EXPLORATIONS American Public Philosophy Institute Brazilian Political Science Association Chair: Christopher Wolfe, Marquette University Chair: Fabiano Guilherme M. Santos, Rio de Janeiro Graduate Research Institute Panel 1 ROUNDTABLE: STANDING Thu 2:00 pm Amâncio Jorge Oliveira, University of Sao Paulo FREEDOM ON ITS HEAD: ‘EQUALITY’ AND Panel 1 EMERGING POWERS AND GLOBAL Sat 4:15 pm ‘NONDISCRIMINATION’ AND THE GOVERNANCE SUPPRESSION OF DEMOCRATIC LIBERTIES British Politics Group Chair: Mark P. Shephard, University of Strathclyde Asian Pacific American Caucus Chair: Kim Geron, California State University, East Bay Panel 1 ROUNDTABLE ON PRESSURE Thu 2:00 pm Natalie Masuoka, Tufts University GROUPS AND THE POLICY PROCESS Panel 1 ASIAN AMERICANS AND Fri 8:00 am IMMIGRANT POLITICAL Panel 2 POLITICS IN SCOTLAND AND Fri 10:15 am INCORPORATION QUEBEC Panel 3 MEASUREMENT AND ELECTORAL Sat 8:00 am Association for Israel Studies BEHAVIOUR IN THE UK Chair: Menachem Hofnung, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Panel 4 BRITISH POLITICS GROUP Fri 2:00 pm ROUNDTABLE- YEAR IN REVIEW Panel 1 ELECTIONS IN ISRAEL, 2009: Fri 2:00 pm CONTINUITY OR CHANGE Campaign Finance Research Group Chair: Michael J. Malbin, Campaign Finance Institute Association for Politics and the Life Sciences Diana Dwyre, California State University, Chico Chair: Albert Somit, Southern Illinois University Steven A. Peterson, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg Panel 1 SMALL DONORS AND LARGE IN Thu 10:15 am U.S. FEDERAL AND STATE Panel 1 EVOLUTION AND POLITICS Thu 8:00 am ELECTIONS Association for the Study of Nationalities Chair: Lowell W. Barrington, Marquette University Panel 1 UKRAINE: LOOKING WEST ... AND Sun 8:00 am EAST 191 Theme, Division and Related Group Panels Cato Institute Panel 6 THE PLACE OF NOBILITY IN THE Sun 8:00 am THOUGHT OF ARISTOTLE, Chair: Christopher Preble, The Cato Institute ARISTOPHANES, AND XENOPHON John Samples, The Cato Institute Panel 7 LIBERTY AND HUMAN NATURE IN Sat 4:15 pm Panel 1 ROUNDTABLE: AMERICAN Sun 8:00 am MODERN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY FOREIGN POLICY AND THE POLITICS OF FEAR: THREAT Panel 8 ABRAHAM LINCOLN: THE 200TH Fri 8:00 am INFLATION SINCE 9/11 ANNIVERSARY OF HIS BIRTH Panel 9 THE CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT Sun 10:15 am Center for the Study of Federalism AND THE LEGACY OF WILLIAM F. BUCKLEY, JR. Chair: John Kincaid, Lafayette College Panel 10 LEO STRAUSS’S ‘WHAT IS Fri 10:15 am Panel 1 DO WE NEED A NEW ACIR: Fri 10:15 am POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY?’: 50TH REFLECTIONS ON THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY ANNIVERSARY OF THE U.S. ACIR Co-sponsored by 28-9 Panel 11 THE AMERICAN FOUNDERS AND Sat 10:15 am FREE SPEECH Center for the Study of the Constitution Panel 12 THE RECENT TERM OF THE U.S. Sat 8:00 am Chair: Warner R. Winborne, Hampden-Sydney College SUPREME COURT Panel 13 THE NEW DEAL AND ITS LEGACY Thu 2:00 pm Panel 1 JUDICIAL RESTRAINT AND Fri 10:15 am POLITICAL CHANGE: FIERCE Panel 14 CICERO’S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY Fri 2:00 pm OPPONENTS OR FELLOW TRAVELERS? Panel 15 TOCQUEVILLE AFTER 150 YEARS: Sat 2:00 pm WHAT IS ALIVE AND WHAT IS DEAD IN THE POLITICAL Christians in Political Science PHILOSOPHY OF ALEXIS DE Chair: Kevin J. Cooney, Northwest University TOCQUEVILLE? Mark David Hall, George Fox University Committee for Analysis of Military Operations and Strategy Panel 1 EVANGELICAL POLITICAL Sat 8:00 am THOUGHT AND NATURAL LAW Chair: Jason Lyall, Princeton University Co-sponsored by 33-2 Panel 1 COERCION AND RECONCILIATION Fri 8:00 am Panel 2 THE DISAPPEARING GOD GAP? Thu 4:15 pm IN COUNTERINSURGENCY RELIGION IN THE 2008 OPERATIONS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Co-sponsored by 33-3 Committee on Political Sociology Panel 3 RELIGION AND GLOBAL POLITICS Fri 4:15 pm Chair: Florence Faucher-King, Sciences Po Piero Ignazi, University of Bologna The Churchill Centre Panel 1 PARTY ORGANIZATIONS AND THE Fri 10:15 am Chair: James W. Muller, University of Alaska, Anchorage CHALLENGE OF “DEMOCRATIZATION” Panel 1 CHURCHILL AND CANADA Thu 2:00 pm Committee on the Political Economy of the Good Society Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Chair: Stephen L. Elkin, University of Maryland Political Philosophy Jeremy A. Janow, University of Maryland, College Park Chair: Thomas Karako, Kenyon College Ronald J. Pestritto, Jr., Hillsdale College Panel 1 AUTHOR MEETS CRITICS: JAMES Fri 8:00 am FISHKIN, WHEN THE PEOPLE Panel 1 ROUNDTABLE: SAME-SEX Thu 8:00 am SPEAK: DELIBERATIVE ‘MARRIAGE’ IN THE U.S. AND DEMOCRACY AND PUBLIC CANADA: LEGAL CONTROVERSIES CONSULTATION AND EVOLVING PARADIGMS Co-sponsored by 2-50 Panel 2 ROUNDTABLE: THE STATE OF Thu 10:15 am ACADEMIC FREE SPEECH IN Comparative Urban Politics CANADA AND THE U.S. Chair: Ronald K. Vogel, University of Louisville Panel 3 ROUNDTABLE: ISLAM AND THE Thu 2:00 pm WEST Panel 1 SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS Fri 8:00 am AND THE STIMULUS PACKAGES IN Panel 4 ROUNDTABLE: THE OBAMA Fri 4:15 pm THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA ADMINISTRATION: FIRST SEVEN Co-sponsored by 28-10 MONTHS Panel 2 DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE Fri 4:15 pm Panel 5 ABRAHAM LINCOLN AND THE Thu 4:15 pm AND SOCIAL INEQUALITY AMERICAN PROGRESSIVE Co-sponsored by 11-76 MOVEMENT 192 Theme, Division and Related Group Panels Conference Group on Italian Politics and Society Panel 9 THEORISTS, THEOLOGIANS, AND Sat 2:00 pm LITTÉRATEURS: EVIL AND Chair: Maurizio Carbone, University of Glasgow MODERN POLITICAL THOUGHT Panel 1 ITALIAN POLITICS BETWEEN Thu 2:00 pm Panel 10 VOEGELIN IN TORONTO, THE DVD: Sat 4:15 pm REFORMS AND REVIVAL REFLECTIONS ON THE 1978 YORK UNIVERSITY “HERMENEUTICS AND Conference Group on Jurisprudence and Public Law STRUCTURALISM” CONFERENCE Chair: David Fagelson, American University Panel 11 THE PRIMACY OF PERSONS IN Thu 4:15 pm POLITICS: EMPIRICISM AND Panel 1 ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE Thu 8:00 am THEORY ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY Panel 12 THE LANGUAGES OF POLITICAL Sun 8:00 am ORDER: EXPERIENCE AND Conference Group on Taiwan Studies SYMBOLIZATION IN NON-WESTERN Chair: Joseph Wong, University of Toronto MODES OF THOUGHT Panel 13 ROUNDTABLE: THE MODERN Fri 8:00 am Panel 1 GOVERNING TAIWAN Thu 4:15 pm PHILOSOPHICAL REVOLUTION: Panel 2 CHOICE AND DEMOCRACY IN Fri 2:00 pm THE LUMINOSITY OF EXISTENCE Related Group Panels TAIWAN Panel 3 TRANSNATIONALISM AND Sat 8:00 am European Consortium for Political Research TAIWAN’S ROLE IN THE WORLD Chair: Luciano Bardi, Università di Pisa Louise Hawkridge, European Consortium for Political Research Panel 4 RE-CONSIDERING THE Sun 10:15 am DEVELOPMENTAL STATE Panel 1 THE AMERICANISATION OF Fri 8:00 am EUROPEAN EXECUTIVES Conference Group on the Middle East Panel 2 ENERGY POLICY AND GLOBAL Sat 10:15 am Chair: Augustus Richard Norton, Boston University WARMING: AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES Panel 1 POLITICAL REFORM IN THE Fri 10:15 am MIDDLE EAST: CONTEXTS, Panel 3 TERRORS IN TRANSATLANTIA- Sat 4:15 pm DILEMMAS, CASES STILL? EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES FROM BUSH TO OBAMA Conference Group on Theory, Policy, and Society French Politics Group Chair: Frank Fischer, Rutgers University, Newark Dvora Yanow, Vrije Universiteit Chair: Andrew M.
Recommended publications
  • Backgrounder Global Centre for Pluralism Mission

    Backgrounder Global Centre for Pluralism Mission

    Global Centre for Pluralism: Backgrounder Global Centre for Pluralism Mission: The Global Centre for Pluralism serves as a global platform for comparative analysis, education and dialogue about the choices and actions that advance and sustain pluralism. Vision: The Centre’s vision is a world where human differences are valued and diverse societies thrive. The Global Centre for Pluralism is an independent, charitable organization created to advance positive responses to the challenge of living peacefully and productively together in diverse societies. Why Canada Founded in Ottawa by His Highness the Aga Khan in partnership with the Government of Canada, the Centre takes inspiration from Canada’s experience. Respect for diversity has developed into a defining characteristic of Canada and a core element of the country’s identity. Although still a work in progress, Canada is a global leader in the way it has valued and managed its diverse multi-ethnic, multicultural fabric. The Centre’s headquarters will be a platform for analysing and sharing Canada’s ongoing pluralism journey with the world. His Highness the Aga Khan His Highness the Aga Khan is the 49th hereditary Imam (Spiritual Leader) of the Shia Imami Ismaili Muslims. For His Highness the Aga Khan, one manifestation of his hereditary responsibilities has been a deep engagement with development for almost 60 years. Ties with Canada: His Highness has long been interested in Canada’s experience of pluralism. His close ties with Canada go back almost four decades to the 1970s when many thousands of Asian refugees expelled from Uganda, including many Ismailis, were welcomed into Canadian society.
  • March 28 – 30, 2013 Hollywood, California

    March 28 – 30, 2013 Hollywood, California

    Western Political Science Association CONFERENCE THEME: THE EMPIRES STRIKE BACK! March 28 – 30, 2013 Hollywood, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page WELCOME AND SPECIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ii WESTERN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION OFFICERS .................. iv COMMITTEES OF THE WESTERN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION ...................................................................................... vi WPSA ANNUAL AWARDS GUIDELINES ................................................. viii WPSA AWARDS TO BE ANNOUNCED AT THE 2013 MEETING ............. x CALL FOR PAPERS 2014 MEETING ......................................................... xi MEETING SCHEDULE AND SPECIAL EVENTS ........................................ 1 AUTHOR MEETS CRITICS PANELS .......................................................... 5 SCHEDULE OF PANELS ............................................................................ 6 PANEL LISTINGS: THURSDAY, 8:00 AM – 9:45 AM .................................................. 40 THURSDAY, 10:00 AM – 11:45 AM .................................................. 53 THURSDAY, 1:15 PM – 3:00 PM .................................................. 68 THURSDAY, 3:15 PM – 5:00 PM .................................................. 84 FRIDAY, 8:00 AM – 9:45 AM ................................................. 98 FRIDAY, 10:00 AM – 11:45 AM ............................................... 113 FRIDAY, 1:15 PM – 3:00 PM ............................................... 127 FRIDAY, 3:15 PM – 5:00 PM ..............................................
  • And 'Window-Dressing'

    And 'Window-Dressing'

    Between ‘deepening democracy’ and ‘window-dressing’ - Explaining policy-effects of dialog-oriented procedures1 Paper to be presented at ECPR General Conference 2016, 7-10 September 2016, Prague Panel: “Innovating Local Involvement of Citizens” Pamela Hess2 / Brigitte Geissel Abstract: The effects of dialog-oriented procedures on policies are discussed within both academic and practitioner communities. On one hand, dialog-oriented procedures are expected to deepen democracy in the sense of strengthening the links between public dialog and political decision making. On the other hand, opponents argue that in most cases these procedures are only symbolic window-dressing. We assume that dialog-oriented procedures can be both, and their policy effects depend on certain factors. So far, not much research has been done on explaining policy-effects of dialog-oriented procedures, and much of the past work focused on single case studies or on narrative synopses of very few cases. The paper is contributing to fill this gap through a quantitative meta-synthesis, which combines and aggregates data from primary studies on local procedures. It identifies the variables which make it more likely that dialog-oriented procedures have an impact on policy making (“effective dialog-oriented procedures”). We focus exemplarily on local procedures in Germany. Germany is an interesting case, because its local representative democracy is increasingly complemented with participatory approaches. The findings indicate that particularly comprehensive municipal commitments
  • Religious Liberty in Australia: Some Suggestions and Proposals for Reframing Traditional Categorisations

    Religious Liberty in Australia: Some Suggestions and Proposals for Reframing Traditional Categorisations

    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Law Papers and Journal Articles School of Law 2018 Religious liberty in Australia: Some suggestions and proposals for reframing traditional categorisations Iain T. Benson The University of Notre Dame Australia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/law_article Part of the Law Commons This article was originally published as: Benson, I. T. (2018). Religious liberty in Australia: Some suggestions and proposals for reframing traditional categorisations. Zadok Perspectives, 139, 10-17. Original article available here: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=841942196842826;res=IELHSS This article is posted on ResearchOnline@ND at https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/law_article/81. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This article originally published: - Benson, I.T. (2018) Religious liberty in Australia: Some suggestions and proposals for reframing traditional categorisations. Zadok Perspectives, 139, 10-17. Retrieved from https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=841942196842826;res=IELHSS Permission granted by Zadok Perspectives for use in ResearchOnline@ND. © Ethos: EA Centre for Christianity and Society 2018 (http://www.ethos.org.au/). 10 Religious Liberty in Australia: some suggestions and proposals for reframing traditional categorisations Iain T. Benson to the important terms ‘discrimination’ (as discussed in the submission of ‘Freedom for Faith’1) and ‘hatred’, when what is really
  • Burnaby) Rights League Re: Draft Policy 5.45 (Homophobia/Heterosexism)

    Burnaby) Rights League Re: Draft Policy 5.45 (Homophobia/Heterosexism)

    Catholic Civil Submission to School District 41 (Burnaby) Rights League Re: Draft Policy 5.45 (Homophobia/heterosexism) Sean Murphy, Director CCRL British Columbia 2 June, 2011 Executive Officers Burnaby School District’s proposed Policy 5.45 on so-called “homophobia” Chaplain Most Rev. Adam Exner,OMI and “heterosexism” is not morally neutral. It is intended to force the moral President Emeritus beliefs of its authors upon students and teachers, and to silence and punish Tom Langan those unwilling to conform. President Philip Horgan This is implicit in its opening statement of policy, and explicit in its definitions and enforcement provisions. The policy’s authors believe that homosexual, Regional Directors bisexual and other undefinable sexual inclinations, conduct and lifestyles are Alberta Luke Campbell morally acceptable: that they are morally equivalent in every respect to natural British Columbia heterosexual attractions and relationships. Constitutional lawyer Iain Benson Sean Murphy has described such beliefs as sexual dogma: “the deepest beliefs a person Ed De Vita might have” about sexuality.1 Central Region Francine Lee National Capital Region Those who drafted and support Policy 5.45 may not be religious believers, but Richard Bastien they are believers nonetheless. The policy expresses their deeply held moral Ontario Region beliefs about the human person and human society, human sexuality, and their John Shea 2 Robert Baksi beliefs about good and evil. The development of this policy by School Quebec Region District 41 is an excellent example of what Professor Jay Budziszewski calls Nicholas Newman “bad faith authoritarianism . a dishonest way of advancing a moral view by Mrs.
  • 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Dear Friends

    2017 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Dear Friends

    Our mission is to help young people, especially those who need us most, build strong character and realize their full potential as responsible citizens and leaders. We do this by providing: a safe haven filled with hope and opportunity, ongoing relationships with caring adults, and life-enhancing programs. BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Dear Friends, This year – and for the last three years – under the remarkable leadership of outgoing Board Chair Dana Smith, Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston has worked diligently to develop an incredible breadth and depth of thoughtfully designed programs to help our members succeed academically, live healthy lifestyles, practice good citizenship and be prepared for life after the Club. In this report, I invite you to read about just a few of the opportunities we provided to more than 17,000 young people at our Clubs. While BGCB invests $3,100 to serve each member – many of whom come from households with incomes of less than $33,000 per year – we only charge $25 per school year for 6-12 year olds and just $5 a year for teens – and no child is turned away because of an inability to pay. Each one of the generous contributions made by the individuals, corporations, foundations and community partners listed in this report played an important role in making this possible. In order to stay affordable and continue to offer even more enriching programs to the kids who need us most, I am excited to share that we successfully completed our five-year Opening Doors Campaign for Our Children, Our City, Our Future and surpassed our goal of $125 million – raising $131 million! We have also exceeded our planned giving goal of securing over 75 members of the Frederic C.
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

    Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 567 Filed 11/12/16 Page 1 of 16 1 DANIEL M. PETROCELLI (S.B. #97802) [email protected] 2 DAVID MARROSO (S.B. #211655) [email protected] 3 DAVID L. KIRMAN (S.B. #235175) [email protected] 4 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars 5 Los Angeles, California 90067–6035 Telephone: (310) 553-6700 6 Facsimile: (310) 246-6779 7 JILL A. MARTIN (S.B. #245626) [email protected] 8 c/o TRUMP NATIONAL GOLF CLUB One Trump National Drive 9 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Telephone: (310) 202-3225 10 Facsimile: (310) 265-5522 11 Attorneys for Defendants DONALD J. TRUMP and 12 TRUMP UNIVERSITY, LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 SONNY LOW, J.R. EVERETT, and Case No. 10-CV-0940-GPC (WVG) 17 JOHN BROWN, on Behalf of Judge: Hon. Gonzalo P Curiel Themselves and All Others Similarly 18 Situated, CLASS ACTION 19 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 20 v. TRIAL DATE 21 TRUMP UNIVERSITY, LLC et al., DATE: EX PARTE 22 TIME: EX PARTE Defendants. COURT: 2D 23 JUDGE: HON. CURIEL 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:10-cv-00940-GPC-WVG Document 567 Filed 11/12/16 Page 2 of 16 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 4 II. THE CONSTITUTION, DEFERENCE TO THE PRESIDENT- ELECT, AND BASIC PRAGMATISM COMPEL THE MODEST 5 RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS MOTION. ......................................................... 3 6 A. Separation of Powers Requires That the Trial Court Schedule Its Proceedings So As To Not Impede a President’s Public Duties.
  • An Associational Framework for the Reconciliation of Competing Rights Claims Involving the Freedom of Religion

    An Associational Framework for the Reconciliation of Competing Rights Claims Involving the Freedom of Religion

    An Associational Framework for the Reconciliation of Competing Rights Claims Involving the Freedom of Religion IAIN T. BENSON© Student Number 469 698 A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of the Witwatersrand September 12 2013 ABSTRACT Conflicts of rights involving the freedom of religion should be approached on the basis of a close examination of the proper competence of law and religions. This examination begins by asking what questions law and religion are best suited to answer in a post theocratic age that views constitutional laws as operating under and within the conditions of diversity and pluralism. An analysis of religious employer exemption cases in two jurisdictions, South Africa and Canada, shows that certain contemporary “liberal” approaches fail to accord sufficient respect to associational diversity. An historical view of the relationship between law and religion, reviewing both “the goods of religion” and “the limits of law” suggests that contemporary liberalism tends to diminish the role of religions and religious associations giving too much power to the State and/or the Courts with a corresponding failure to let religions play the role within culture that their proper jurisdictions, correctly understood, admit and that an open culture requires. The analysis shows that the Canadian and South African courts have, in some cases, explicitly but more often implicitly, stepped into the role of answering metaphysical, philosophical and theological questions for which they are not suited. This problem -- erroneous jurisdictional extension by law -- is the use of law by equality activists who wish to force homogeneous conceptions such as “equality” or “non-discrimination” on all aspects of society, including religious associations, irrespective of whether those subordinate groups should be accorded the respect entailed by the principle of diversity- - a respect already allowed for in the laws related to religious employer exemptions.
  • Hamilton College Catalogue 2015-16

    Hamilton College Catalogue 2015-16

    HAMILTON COLLEGE CATALOGUE 2015-16 1 Hamilton College Calendar 2015-16 Aug. 18-26 Saturday – Wednesday New student orientation 25 Tuesday Residence halls open for upperclass students, 9 a.m. 27 Thursday Fall semester classes begin, 8 a.m. Sept. 4 Friday Last day to add a course, 2 p.m. 18 Friday Last day to exercise credit/no credit option, 3 p.m. Oct. 2-4 Friday – Sunday Fallcoming 14 Wednesday Fall Recess begins, 4 p.m. Academic warnings due Last day to declare leave of absence for spring semester 2016 19 Monday Classes resume, 8 a.m. 21 Wednesday Last day to drop a course without penalty, 3 p.m. 23-25 Friday – Saturday Family Weekend Nov. 2-20 Registration period for spring 2016 courses 20 Friday Thanksgiving recess begins, 4 p.m. 30 Monday Classes resume, 8 a.m. Dec. 11 Friday Fall semester classes end 12-14 Saturday – Monday Reading period 14-18 Monday – Friday Final examinations 19 Saturday Residence halls close, noon Jan. 15-18 Friday – Monday New student orientation 17 Sunday Residence halls open, 9 a.m. 18 Monday Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday 19 Tuesday Spring semester classes begin, 8 a.m. 27 Wednesday Last day to add a course, 2 p.m. Last day for seniors to declare a minor Feb. 5 Friday Last day to exercise credit/no credit option, 3 p.m. 8-12 Monday – Friday Sophomores declare concentration 26 Friday Last day to declare a leave of absence for fall semester 2016 Mar. 4 Friday Academic warnings due 11 Friday Spring recess begins, 4 p.m.
  • READY to Govern Improving the Presidential Transition

    READY to Govern Improving the Presidential Transition

    READY to Govern Improving the Presidential Transition JANUARY 2010 PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE READY TO GOVERN | IMPROVING THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION The Partnership for Public Service is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to revitalize the federal government by inspiring a new generation to serve and by transforming the way government works. READY TO GOVERN | IMPROVING THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As more than one million people poured onto the Na- were elected, leaving only two-and-a-half months to as- tional Mall for Barack Obama’s historic January 20, sume leadership of the most important government in 2009 presidential inauguration, outgoing and incoming the world. In some cases, outgoing administrations have national security officials huddled in the White House not been fully cooperative or the incoming team has not Situation Room monitoring reports about a possible at- always been receptive to even hearing advice from de- tack on Washington, D.C. by a militant Somali terrorist parting officials. group with links to al Qaeda. During the 2008-2009 transition, the Bush White This was the nightmare transition scenario for Joshua House worked very hard to ensure that there would be a Bolten, President George W. Bush’s chief of staff. The smooth transfer of power to whoever won the election. political leadership of the country was gathering at the Capitol and the president’s staff had cleaned out their Republican presidential candidate John McCain laid White House offices, but the new president and his team down a basic foundation and established a game plan for were not yet in charge.
  • Benson, Iain T1 Seeing Through the Secular Illusion© Abstract

    Benson, Iain T1 Seeing Through the Secular Illusion© Abstract

    Benson, Iain T1 Seeing through the secular illusion© ABsTrAcT It is often said that we live in a ‘secular’ age and that the principles of ‘secularism’ lead to a ‘neutral’ public sphere. The central terms ‘secular’ and ‘secularism’ however, though they are often used are rarely examined. related terms, relevant to their meaning, such as ‘faith’ and ‘belief’ are also seldom defined or compared alongside each other to evaluate how well they comply with principles of justice. In this paper, a development of others on similar themes, Professor Benson examines various definitions alongside contemporary topics and legal decisions to argue that an open public sphere requires re-thinking how many of the central terms are used. Only when it is recognized that not all ‘faiths’ are religious and that all citizens operate out of some sort of faith commitments can we be properly in a position to evaluate non- religious faiths alongside religiously informed ones. This re-adjustment of the usual way of examining matters then should lead, Professor Benson argues, to a more accurate way of viewing current education and politics (and their areas of avoidance) as well as such things as fair access to the public square by religious believers and their communities. The long dominance of atheistic and agnostic forms of social ordering (including funding for such things as education and health care) is based, in part, on a belief that stripping religious frameworks from public sector projects is ‘neutral’ when it is not. In addition, the focus on a rights based jurisprudence has a tendency to view rights such as the freedom of religion in individualist ways that ignore the communal importance of religion.
  • Hamilton College Catalogue 2011-12

    Hamilton College Catalogue 2011-12

    Hamilton College Catalogue 2011-12 Hamilton College Calendar 2011-2012 Aug. 20-24 Saturday-Wednesday New Student Orientation 23 Tuesday Residence halls open for upperclass students, 9 am 25 Thursday Fall semester classes begin, 8 am Sept. 2 Friday Last day to add a course, 2 pm 16 Friday Last Day to exercise credit/no credit option, 3 pm 23-25 Friday-Sunday Fallcoming/Family Weekend/Bicentennial Celebration Oct. 7 Friday Last day to declare leave of absence for Spring semester 2012 12 Wednesday Fall Recess Begins, 4 pm Academic warnings due 17 Monday Classes resume, 8 am 19 Wednesday Last day to drop a course without penalty, 3 pm Nov. 1-18 Registration period for Spring 2012 courses (tentative) 18 Friday Thanksgiving recess begins, 4 pm 28 Monday Classes resume, 8 am Dec. 9 Friday Fall semester classes end 10-12 Saturday-Monday Reading period 12-16 Monday-Friday Final examinations 17 Saturday Residence halls close, noon Jan. 12-14 Thursday-Saturday New Student Orientation 14 Saturday Residence halls open, 9 am 16 Monday Spring semester classes begin, 8 am 20 Friday Last day for Seniors to declare a minor 24 Tuesday Last day to add a course, 2 pm Feb. 3 Friday Last day to exercise credit/no credit option, 3 pm 6-10 Monday-Friday Sophomores declare concentration 24 Friday Last day to declare leave of absence for Fall semester 2012 Mar. 2 Friday Academic warnings due 9 Friday Spring recess begins, 4 pm; Last day to drop a course without penalty, 3 pm 26 Monday Classes resume, 8 am Apr.