The Three Dimensions of Political Action in United States Democracy: Corporations As Political Actors and "Franchise Governments"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Three Dimensions of Political Action in United States Democracy: Corporations As Political Actors and University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2017 The Three Dimensions of Political Action in United States Democracy: Corporations as Political Actors and "Franchise Governments" Steven Alfonso Panageotou University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Panageotou, Steven Alfonso, "The Three Dimensions of Political Action in United States Democracy: Corporations as Political Actors and "Franchise Governments". " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4776 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Steven Alfonso Panageotou entitled "The Three Dimensions of Political Action in United States Democracy: Corporations as Political Actors and "Franchise Governments"." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Sociology. Harry F. Dahms, Jon Shefner, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Anthony J. Nownes, Michelle Brown Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Three Dimensions of Political Action in United States Democracy: Corporations as Political Actors and “Franchise Governments” A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Steven Alfonso Panageotou December 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Steven Panageotou All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my dog, Odysseus. This dissertation was written during our walks. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my committee co-chairs, Dr. Harry F. Dahms and Dr. Jon Shefner, for the many months they spent working with me on this dissertation. Dr. Dahms has inspired me since the day I arrived in Knoxville. Dr. Shefner has worked with me since day one. Both have been my graduate school fathers. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Michelle Brown and Dr. Anthony J. Nownes, for their support and constructive criticism. I would have never been able to apply biopolitics to corporations had Dr. Brown not started me down this path when she introduced me to Foucault. Dr. Nownes, over many beers, coached me on Congress and the role of money in politics. I am also very grateful for the countless conversations I have had with Joel Crombez, who has been my close friend, travel partner, and research collaborator. Scarcely a sentence has been written that was not in some way sharpened through our talks. I also thank Dr. Michael J. Thompson for being an outside mentor who has been a source of encouragement and professional support for years now. I hope to live up to the example he has set in linking politics to critical theory. And, I thank Aaron Lemelin, Kyle Letteney, Doug Oeser, and Charles Walton for their friendship while I wrote this dissertation. Finally, I thank my parents, Vasilis and Diana Panageotou, for their unconditional love and for all the sacrifices they made to help me achieve my goals. I thank my brother, George Panageotou, for helping me learn the ins and outs of the mutual fund industry, and I thank my sister, Christina Panageotou, for always being there to talk. Last but certainly not least, I thank Sarah Elliott for being my partner and confidant throughout my dissertating. This dissertation was made possible by the guidance, advice, and support of all these individuals. But the responsibility for all arguments and any errors in this dissertation is my own. Many of the arguments developed in this dissertation, particularly those concerned with the participatory-deliberative model of democracy, were drawn from my book chapter “Corporate Power in the Twenty-First Century” forthcoming in The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology, edited by William Outhwaite and Stephen Turner. iv ABSTRACT A tension has persisted in the United States between the principles of democracy and the capitalist economy. At its core, democracy refers to the ideal that people should govern themselves. Democracy is indeterminate, its future open. But the open-ended principle of democracy collides with the authoritarian nature of corporations that centralize power within bureaucratic institutions designed to rationalize and augment capital accumulation. The purpose of this dissertation is to explain why democratic aspirations to realize a system of ‘rule by the people’ have been confounded by corporate political power. To do so, I delineate how political theorists have envisioned ‘rule by the people’ within the three dominant models of democracy that are prevalent today—liberal, participatory-deliberative, and market democracy. Within each model, people are intended to exercise self-rule by practicing specific modes of political action, which I label as the first, second, and third dimensions of political action. However, theorists have focused on the ways in which human citizens practice politics while paying insufficient attention to the political role of (nonhuman) modern business corporations. This research emphasis is misguided because the political power of citizens has been eclipsed by the political power of corporations. Their power derives from corporations’ dual identity in modern societies—corporations are both political actors and “franchise governments” (Ciepley 2013:140) that are part of the political structure itself. These dual identities feed into each other in a dialectical process that functions to relentlessly augment the political power of corporations. As a result, corporations negate the normative impulse animating each model of democracy and deploy their political power to solidify policies and processes that increase economic inequality. v TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 Models of Democracy ..................................................................................................................2 A Political Theory of Economic Inequality .................................................................................5 Chapter Overview ........................................................................................................................8 CHAPTER 1: THREE MODELS OF DEMOCRACY ............................................................10 Why Models of Democracy?......................................................................................................11 The Origins of the Modular Approach to Democracy: Joseph A. Schumpeter .........................16 The Influence of Weber on Schumpeter’s Models of Democracy .........................................16 Schumpeter’s Democratic Method vs. Classical Doctrine of Democracy .............................19 Not Two, but Three Models of Democracy ...............................................................................25 Liberal Democracy .................................................................................................................26 Participatory-Deliberative Democracy ...................................................................................29 Market Democracy .................................................................................................................31 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................34 CHAPTER 2: CORPORATIONS AS POLITICAL ACTORS AND “FRANCHISE GOVERNMENTS” ......................................................................................................................37 The Politics of Corporations ......................................................................................................37 Treating Time Periods as Cases .................................................................................................40 The Gestation of U.S. Corporations: 1776 to 1880s ..................................................................45 The Birth and Infancy of U.S. Corporations: 1880s to 1929 ....................................................50 The Instantiation of the Liberal State and the Recognition of Corporate Personhood ...........52 Corporate Consolidation and the Federal Government’s Half-Hearted Attempt to Stop It ...55 The Adolescence of U.S. Corporations: 1929 to 1970s .............................................................60 The Maturation of U.S. Corporations: 1970s to the Twenty-First Century ...............................67 Campaign Finance Reform: 1970s to Citizens United ...........................................................70 The Recovery of Corporate Profits: Crushing Labor and Restructuring Corporations ..........74 Conclusion: Corporations as “Franchise Governments” ............................................................80
Recommended publications
  • 66, 13 January 2014
    sanity, humanity and science probably the world’s most read economics journal real-world economics review - Subscribers: 23,924 Subscribe here Blog ISSN 1755-9472 - A journal of the World Economics Association (WEA) 12,557 members, join here - Sister open-access journals: Economic Thought and World Economic Review - back issues at www.paecon.net recent issues: 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 Issue no. 66, 13 January 2014 In this issue: Secular stagnation and endogenous money 2 Steve Keen Micro versus Macro 12 Lars Pålsson Syll On facts and values: a critique of the fact value dichotomy 30 Joseph Noko Modern Money Theory and New Currency Theory: A comparative discussion 38 Joseph Huber Fama-Shiller, the Prize Committee and the “Efficient Markets Hypothesis” 58 Bernard Guerrien and Ozgur Gun How capitalists learned to stop worrying and love the crisis 65 Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan Two approaches to global competition: A historical review 74 M. Shahid Alam Dimensions of real-world competition – a critical realist perspective 80 Hubert Buch-Hansen Information economics as mainstream economics and the limits of reform 95 Jamie Morgan and Brendan Sheehan The ℵ capability matrix: GDP and the economics of human development 109 Jorge Buzaglo Open access vs. academic power 127 C P Chandrasekhar Interview with Edward Fullbrook on New Paradigm Economics vs. Old Paradigm Economics 131 Book review of The Great Eurozone Disaster: From Crisis to Global New Deal by Heikki Patomäki 144 Comment: Romar Correa on “A Copernican Turn in Banking Union”, by Thomas Mayer 147 Board of Editors, past contributors, submissions and etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism As a Mode of Power. Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan Interviewed by Piotr Dutkiewicz
    Capitalism as a Mode of Power Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan Interviewed by Piotr Dutkiewicz Jerusalem, Montreal and Ottawa, July 2013 www.bnarchives.net Creative Commons A shorter version of this interview is forthcoming in 22 Ideas to Fix the World: Conver- sations with the World’s Foremost Thinkers, edited by Piotr Dutkiewicz and Richard Sakwa (New York: New York University Press, WPF and the Social Science Re- search Council, 2013). Piotr Dutkiewicz: In a unique two-pronged dovetailing discussion, frequent collabo- rators and coauthors Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler discuss the nature of contemporary capitalism. Their central argument is that the dominant approaches to studying the market – liberalism and Marxism – are as flawed as the market itself. Offering a historically rich and analytically incisive critique of the recent history of capitalism and crisis, they suggest that instead of studying the relations of capital to power we must conceptualize capital as power if we are to understand the dynamics of the market system. This approach allows us to examine the seemingly paradoxical workings of the capitalist mechanism, whereby profit and capitalization are divorced from productivity and machines in the so-called real economy. Indeed Nitzan and Bichler paint a picture of a strained system whose component parts exist in an an- tagonistic relationship. In their opinion, the current crisis is a systemic one afflicting a fatally flawed system. However, it is not one that seems to be giving birth to a uni- fied opposition movement or to a new mode of thinking. The two political econo- mists call for nothing short of a new mode of imagining the market, our political sys- tem, and our very world.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong's Pro-Democracy Protests
    Protests & Democracy: Hong Kong’s Pro-Democracy Protests Jennifer Yi Advisor: Professor Tsung Chi Politics Senior Comprehensive Project Candidate for Honors consideration April 10, 2015 2 Abstract Protests that occur in the public sphere shed light on the different types of democracy that exist in a region. A protester’s reason for participation demonstrates what type of democracy is missing, while a protest itself demonstrates what type of democracy exists in the region. This Politics Senior Comprehensive Project hypothesizes that the recent pro-democracy protests in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“Hong Kong”), dubbed the Umbrella Movement, demonstrate an effective democracy due to active citizen engagement within the public sphere. Data is collected through personal interviews of Umbrella Movement participants that demonstrate what type of democracy currently exists in Hong Kong, what type of democracy protesters are looking for, and what type of democracy exists as a result of the recent protests. The interviews show that a true representative and substantive democracy do not exist in Hong Kong as citizens are not provided the democratic rights that define these types of democracy. However, the Umbrella Movement demonstrates an effective democracy in the region as citizens actively engage with one another within the public sphere for the purpose of achieving a representative and substantive democracy in Hong Kong. 3 I. Introduction After spending most of my junior year studying in Hong Kong, I have become very interested in the region and its politics. I am specifically interested in the different types of democracy that exist in Hong Kong as it is a special administrative region of the People’s Republic of China (“China”).
    [Show full text]
  • March 28 – 30, 2013 Hollywood, California
    Western Political Science Association CONFERENCE THEME: THE EMPIRES STRIKE BACK! March 28 – 30, 2013 Hollywood, California TABLE OF CONTENTS Page WELCOME AND SPECIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ii WESTERN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION OFFICERS .................. iv COMMITTEES OF THE WESTERN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION ...................................................................................... vi WPSA ANNUAL AWARDS GUIDELINES ................................................. viii WPSA AWARDS TO BE ANNOUNCED AT THE 2013 MEETING ............. x CALL FOR PAPERS 2014 MEETING ......................................................... xi MEETING SCHEDULE AND SPECIAL EVENTS ........................................ 1 AUTHOR MEETS CRITICS PANELS .......................................................... 5 SCHEDULE OF PANELS ............................................................................ 6 PANEL LISTINGS: THURSDAY, 8:00 AM – 9:45 AM .................................................. 40 THURSDAY, 10:00 AM – 11:45 AM .................................................. 53 THURSDAY, 1:15 PM – 3:00 PM .................................................. 68 THURSDAY, 3:15 PM – 5:00 PM .................................................. 84 FRIDAY, 8:00 AM – 9:45 AM ................................................. 98 FRIDAY, 10:00 AM – 11:45 AM ............................................... 113 FRIDAY, 1:15 PM – 3:00 PM ............................................... 127 FRIDAY, 3:15 PM – 5:00 PM ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Down Trumpism from Africa: Delegitimation, Not Collaboration, Please Patrick Bond 9 Feb 2017
    Taking down Trumpism from Africa: Delegitimation, not collaboration, please Patrick Bond 9 Feb 2017 In the US there are already effective Trump boycotts seeking to delegitimise his political agenda. Internationally, protesters will be out wherever he goes. And from Africa, there are sound arguments to play a catalytic role, mainly because the most serious threat to humanity and environment is Trump’s climate change denialism. Consider two contrasting strategies to deal with the latest mutation of US imperialism: we should protest Donald Trump and Trumpism at every opportunity as a way to contribute to the unity of the world’s oppressed people, and now more urgently link our intersectional struggles; or we should somehow take advantage of his presidency to promote the interests of the ‘left’ or the ‘Global South’ where there is overlap in weakening Washington’s grip (such as in questioning exploitative world trading regimes). The latter position is now rare indeed, although before the election Hillary Clinton’s commitment to militaristic neoliberalism generated so much opposition that to some, the anticipated ‘paleo-conservatism’ of an isolationist-minded Trump appeared attractive. One international analyst of great reknown, Boris Kagarlitsky, makes this same argument this week largely because Trump is questioning pro-corporate ‘free trade’ deals. But the argument for selective cooperation with Trump was best articulated in Pambazuka as part of a series of otherwise compelling reflections by the Ugandan writer and former South Centre director Yash Tandon. Tandon might re-examine the ‘space’ he can ‘seize’ with Trump, the ‘fraud’ Since more than any other individual Tandon helped make the 1999 Seattle and Cancun World Trade Organisation summits a profound disaster for world elites, I take him very seriously.
    [Show full text]
  • And 'Window-Dressing'
    Between ‘deepening democracy’ and ‘window-dressing’ - Explaining policy-effects of dialog-oriented procedures1 Paper to be presented at ECPR General Conference 2016, 7-10 September 2016, Prague Panel: “Innovating Local Involvement of Citizens” Pamela Hess2 / Brigitte Geissel Abstract: The effects of dialog-oriented procedures on policies are discussed within both academic and practitioner communities. On one hand, dialog-oriented procedures are expected to deepen democracy in the sense of strengthening the links between public dialog and political decision making. On the other hand, opponents argue that in most cases these procedures are only symbolic window-dressing. We assume that dialog-oriented procedures can be both, and their policy effects depend on certain factors. So far, not much research has been done on explaining policy-effects of dialog-oriented procedures, and much of the past work focused on single case studies or on narrative synopses of very few cases. The paper is contributing to fill this gap through a quantitative meta-synthesis, which combines and aggregates data from primary studies on local procedures. It identifies the variables which make it more likely that dialog-oriented procedures have an impact on policy making (“effective dialog-oriented procedures”). We focus exemplarily on local procedures in Germany. Germany is an interesting case, because its local representative democracy is increasingly complemented with participatory approaches. The findings indicate that particularly comprehensive municipal commitments
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Promotion and Civil Society
    Armine Ishkanian Democracy promotion and civil society Book section Original citation: Ishkanian, Armine (2007) Democracy promotion and civil society. In: Albrow, Martin and Glasius, Marlies and Anheier, Helmut K. and Kaldor, Mary, (eds.) Global Civil Society 2007/8 : Communicative Power and Democracy. Global Civil Society - Year Books . SAGE publications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 58-85. ISBN 9781412948005 © 2007 SAGE Publications This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/37038/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2011 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. GCS_Democracy_CH4/5/6/7:GCS Part 2_Issues 12/7/07 22:16 Page 2 CHAPTER 4 DEMOCRACY PROMOTION AND CIVIL SOCIETY Of the various strands of democracy promotion, in this chapter I focus on civil society strengthening Armine Ishkanian programmes and ask the following questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Siegel by Michael Mitnick Directed by Mark Anderson Phillips
    Next on our stage: IN THE HEIGHTS GOD OF CARNAGE MAKING GOD LAUGH JULY 12-AUGUST 19 SEPT. 13-OCT. 14 NOV. 15-DEC. 23 HIGHLIGHTS A companion guide to The Siegel by Michael Mitnick directed by Mark Anderson Phillips May 17-June 17, 2018 supported by producers Rich & Sally Braugh and Steve & Betsy Moulds Ethan Siegel (Ben Euphrat, center) is perfectly comfortable in between his ex Alice (Ella Dershowitz, right) and her boyfriend Nelson (Davied Morales). So what’s the problem? All show photos by Taylor Sanders. Synopsis In this new romantic comedy, Ethan Siegel is in love and about to ask Alice’s parents for her hand in marriage. But there may be a few problems: Like Alice and Ethan broke up two years ago. Like she’s seeing someone else. And like she’s falling apart from the aftermath of working on a lost election. That doesn’t stop Ethan, and he goes on a comedic journey through modern love in uncertain times. Characters Ethan (Ben Euphrat*): Early 30s. You’ll be kind of in awe of the things that come out of his mouth. Alice (Ella Dershowitz): Early 30s. Ethan’s ex. Thinks fast, but walks too slowly on the sidewalk. Nelson (Davied Morales): Early 30s. Alice’s boyfriend. Likes to be the cool guy. Does not like buffets. Deborah (Luisa Sermol*): Early 60s. Alice’s mother. Doctor. Not great with texts. Ron (Erik Gandolfi): Early 60s. Alice’s father. Lawyer. Not great with alcohol. Jordan (Laura Espino): Defies description. *Member, Actors’ Equity Association About the play & playwright Five years ago, a quirky, random and thoroughly lovable little play called Spacebar: A Broadway Play by Kyle Sugarman had its world premiere here at City Lights.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Youth Participation and Non-Participation in Morocco
    Working Paper No. 36 - May 2017 ISSN 2283-5792 Explaining Youth Participation and Non-Participation in Morocco Saloua Zerhouni, Mohammed V University in Rabat This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 612782. Working Paper No. 36 - May 2017 Youth Participation and Non-Participation in Morocco Table of Contents Introduction 3 Methodology 1. Youth Participation in Context 5 2. Modes of Political Participation and Expression 7 2.1 Informed about and Interested in Politics 2.2 Weak Participation through Organizations 2.3 Growing Interest in Electoral Participation 2.4 A Preference for “Unconventional” Ways of Participation 3. Explaining Youth Non-Participation 13 3.1 The Centrality of Monarchical Power 3.2 Mistrust in Institutions 3.3 Political Exclusion and State Control over Spaces of Participation Conclusion 16 References 18 2 Working Paper No. 36 - May 2017 Explaining Youth Participation and Non-Participation in Morocco Saloua Zerhouni1 Abstract Based on both recent statistics from a national survey and qualitative interviews, the paper analyses the level and modalities of youth participation in Morocco’s public sphere. While individual characteristics such as education, gender, political interest and political knowledge are important for understanding the phenomenon of participation and non-participation, it is argued that contextual factors of youth participation matter. Our data demonstrate weak interest and engagement in the arena of traditional, formal politics. This sphere has become so discredited over the years that participation through political parties and elections is now being perceived by a majority of young people as meaningless.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy & Social Criticism
    Philosophy & Social Criticism http://psc.sagepub.com/ Apathy: the democratic disease Jeffrey E. Green Philosophy Social Criticism 2004 30: 745 DOI: 10.1177/0191453704045763 The online version of this article can be found at: http://psc.sagepub.com/content/30/5-6/745 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Philosophy & Social Criticism can be found at: Email Alerts: http://psc.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://psc.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Dec 6, 2004 What is This? Downloaded from psc.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA on May 6, 2013 12 045763 (to/d) 2/9/04 11:38 am Page 745 Jeffrey E. Green Apathy: the democratic disease Abstract This essay turns to ancient sources in order to rethink the relation- ship between political apathy and democracy. If modern democratic theorists place political apathy entirely outside of democracy – either as a destructive limit upon the full realization of a democratic polity, or, more sanguinely, as a pragmatic necessity which tempers democracy so that it may function in a workable yet watered-down form – the ancients conceived of political apathy as a peculiarly democratic phenomenon that was likely to flourish in tandem with the expansion of egalitarian institutional structures and moral ideas. Evidence for the ancient recognition of political apathy as a uniquely demo- cratic kind of affliction centers on, but is not limited to, three main sources. In literature, the Homeric epic, and specifically the story of Achilles, present apathy for politics and commitment to human equality as synonymous forces.
    [Show full text]
  • AFP V. Becerra
    Nos. 19-251 & 19-255 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ________________ AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ________________ THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ________________ On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ________________ AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF THE CATO INSTITUTE, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, HAMILTON LINCOLN LAW INSTITUTE, REASON FOUNDATION, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, FIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, AND DKT LIBERTY PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS _________________________________________________ Joseph G.S. Greenlee Ilya Shapiro FIREARMS POLICY Counsel of Record COALITION Trevor Burrus 1215 K St., 17th Floor Mallory Reader Sacramento, CA 95814 CATO INSTITUTE (916) 378-5785 1000 Mass. Ave., NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20001 (202) 842-0200 March 1, 2021 [email protected] Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page i QUESTION PRESENTED NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny held that courts should apply narrow tailoring to violations of the freedom of association. Has that requirement been overruled such that the right to associate privately does not enjoy the strong protective standard that applies to other First Amendment rights, which this Court has held requires narrow tailoring regardless of the level of scrutiny? ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED ........................................ i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................... iv INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................... 4 ARGUMENT ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Localization Have Pursued Strategies of the Revolution in Consumer Markets Standardization
    www.hbr.org For a quarter century, the big winners in consumer markets Localization have pursued strategies of The Revolution in Consumer Markets standardization. But success for retailers and product manufacturers now hinges on by Darrell K. Rigby and Vijay Vishwanath their ability to cater to local differences—while maintaining scale efficiencies. Reprint R0604E For a quarter century, the big winners in consumer markets have pursued strategies of standardization. But success for retailers and product manufacturers now hinges on their ability to cater to local differences—while maintaining scale efficiencies. Localization The Revolution in Consumer Markets by Darrell K. Rigby and Vijay Vishwanath We’re in the early stages of a quiet revolution sponse, smart retailers and consumer goods in consumer markets. For decades, the chains companies are starting to customize their of- that have dominated the landscape—titans ferings to local markets, rolling out different like Wal-Mart, Best Buy, and McDonald’s— types of stores, product lines, and alternative have pursued single-minded strategies of stan- approaches to pricing, marketing, staffing, and dardization. They’ve fine-tuned their store customer service. They’re moving from stan- formats, merchandise mixes, and operating dardization to localization. and marketing processes, and they’ve rolled Combining sophisticated data analysis with out their winning formulas internationally. innovative organizational structures, they’re They’ve demanded equally rigorous consis- gaining the efficiencies of centralized manage- tency from suppliers, pushing the standardiza- ment without losing the responsiveness of tion ethic deep into consumer product compa- local authority. The greatest benefit of moving nies and across the entire consumer supply from standardization to localization is strate- chain.
    [Show full text]