DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles, 2012 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles 2nd Edition Edited by A.G. Duff with an Introduction by D.A. Lott and a chapter on Fossil Beetles by P.I. Buckland & P.C. Buckland Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles Copyright © A.G. Duff, 2012. First edition 2008 published by A.G. Duff Revised edition 2012 ISBN: 978-0-9573357-0-7 Published by Pemberley Books (Publishing), United Kingdom. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without written permission from the publisher. Although every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and authors assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. Neither is any liability assumed for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Within the meaning of Article 8.2 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (4th Edition, 1999), this work is not issued for the purposes of zoological nomenclature. Pemberley Books 18 Bathurst Walk, Iver SL0 9AZ United Kingdom Tel.: +44(0)1753 631114 Fax: +44(0)1753 631115 E-mail: [email protected] WWW: www.pemberleybooks.com Cover: Platyrhinus resinosus (Scopoli, 1763) (Anthribidae) © John Walters Summary of changes in the 2012 edition This section details the main changes in the current edition of the checklist, compared to the previous edition (Duff, 2008). For further details of these changes, please refer to the endnotes. Family-group names: . Nomenclature of family-group names follows Bouchard et al. (2011) . Family PAELOBIIDAE is renamed to HYGROBIIDAE . Family SCYDMAENIDAE becomes a subfamily of STAPHYLINIDAE . Family BOLBOCERATIDAE becomes a subfamily of GEOTRUPIDAE . Order of families in SCARABAEOIDEA changed . Family ANOBIIDAE is renamed to PTINIDAE . Family LANGURIIDAE deleted and included species moved to EROTYLIDAE Species added to the main list (47): . Suphrodytes figuratus . Isorhipis melasoides . Somotrichus unifasciatus . Gastrallus laevigatus . Hololepta plana . Mesocoelopus collaris . Ochthebius nilssoni . Mirosternomorphus heali . Catops borealis . Colotes punctatus . Brachygluta klimschi . Meligethes matronalis . Mycetoporus ambiguus . Meligethes symphyti . Mycetoporus reichei . Typhaea haagi . Acrotona convergens . Berginus tamarisci . Gyrophaena transversalis . Semanotus russicus . Anotylus hammondi . Poecilium lividum . Bledius lohsei . Leiopus linnei . Carpelimus erichsoni . Bruchus brachialis . Carpelimus zealandicus . Aphthona pallida . Carpelimus alutaceus . Longitarsus symphyti . Edaphus beszedesi . Pseudoperapion . Paederidus ruficollis brevirostre . Philonthus alpinus . Bradybatus fallax . Quedius lyszkowskii . Cotaster uncipes . Quedius lucidulus . Allopentarthrum elumbe . Gyrohypnus wagneri . Conarthrus praeustus . Agrilus cuprescens . Otiorhynchus cribricollis . Agrilus cyanescens . Sitona gressorius . Trachys subglaber . Polygraphus grandiclava Species deleted from the main list (9): . Hydaticus continentalis . Abax parallelus . Stenolophus comma . Aglyptinus agathidioides . Alevonota aurantiaca . Bledius praetermissus . Heterocerus hispidulus (duplication error) . Protapion ryei . Cathormiocerus maritimus 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank everyone who has helped to create and maintain the Checklist of Beetles of the British Isles. During the early part of this project I was greatly assisted by draft checklist manuscripts written by Roger Booth and Eric Philp. For keeping track of new and deleted species, published updates to the British list were invaluable (Lott, 1995, 1998; Mann, 2000b, 2002; Owen, 1993a, 1994c). Recent published checklists were also very helpful covering the Irish fauna (Anderson, Nash & O'Connor, 1997; Nash, Anderson & O'Connor, 1997), water beetles (Foster, 2004, 2005; Foster & Friday, 2011), Carabidae (Luff, 2007), Leiodidae (Cooter, 1996b), Staphylinidae part (Lott, 2009a; Lott & Anderson, 2011), Dermestidae (Peacock, 1993), Nitiduloidea (Cooter, 1995), Kateretidae and Nitidulidae (Kirk-Spriggs, 1996), Ciidae (Orledge & Booth, 2006; Orledge, 2009), Anthicidae (Telnov, 2010), Scraptiidae (Levey, 2009), seed and leaf beetles (Cox, 2007) and weevils (Morris, 2003, 2011). The late Derek Lott deserves a special mention, not only as the original section author for the very large family Staphylinidae, but also for writing his stimulating introduction to the project, and for his unstinting encouragement. With his encyclopaedic knowledge of the British fauna, and nomenclatural issues in particular, a great debt is owed to Roger Booth for undertaking to author many individual families and for answering numerous questions. All the family authors are to be warmly thanked: Keith Alexander (Cantharidae), Max Barclay (Tetratomidae and Tenebrionidae), Roger Booth (numerous families), Jon Cooter (Leiodidae), Mike Cox (Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae and Chrysomelidae), Garth Foster (water beetles), Colin Johnson (Ptiliidae, Clambidae, Monotomidae, Cryptophagidae, Corylophidae and Latridiidae), Brian Levey (Buprestidae, Mordellidae and Scraptiidae), the late Derek Lott (Staphylinidae), Martin Luff (Carabidae), Darren Mann (Scarabaeoidea), Howard Mendel (Elateroidea), Mike Morris (Curculionoidea), Glenda Orledge (Ciidae) and Martin Rejzek (Cerambycidae). Many thanks also to Phil and Paul Buckland for their chapter on beetles known only as fossils from Quaternary sediments. Several coleopterists have reviewed all or part of the checklist. Tony (A.J.) Allen helped with literature, reviewed numerous drafts of the complete checklist and suggested several formatting improvements. Max Barclay reviewed the arrangement of Otiorhynchus. Martin Collier spotted several errors and suggested some format changes. Scotty Dodd spotted an important error in Altica. Peter Hammond is thanked for correcting several errors, for some formatting suggestions and for thoroughly reviewing the entire checklist. Mark Hill corrected some errors during the course of extracting data for the Biological Records Centre species dictionary. Peter Hodge assisted with literature and drew my attention to a change in Globicornis. Eric Philp spotted a duplication in Heteroceridae. Mark Telfer is to be thanked for his comments on various drafts of the checklist, and for maintaining the MapMate® Coleoptera species dictionary. Finally, the Board of Governors of The Coleopterist journal are to be thanked for allowing the checklist to be hosted on the journal's website at www.coleopterist.org.uk. Andrew Duff Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 Extant or recently extinct native and naturalised species ...................................... 7 Species found as fossils in Quaternary sediments ..............................................127 Non-established introductions ...............................................................................131 Bibliography ............................................................................................................136 Index to family-group and genus-group names ...................................................157 2 Introduction Introduction D.A. Lott ince publication of the Coleoptera volume of the second edition of Kloet & Hincks' S checklist of British insects (Pope, 1977), a large number of additions and deletions to the list have been published, as well as numerous nomenclatural changes. In addition, recent advances in our understanding of the phylogeny of Coleoptera have led to major modifications of higher classification in checklists and catalogues that have been published more recently in Europe and North America. In the absence of any widely accepted, modern checklist of the British fauna, British workers have been using binomial names taken from a variety of often conflicting sources. It is intended that this checklist should have a wider currency and be suitable for use in future conservation reviews, survey reports and taxonomic dictionaries for biological recording. It is, therefore, vital that the nomenclature used should be widely accepted by coleopterists working on the British fauna. It is also important that the checklist should be as useful as possible to those working at larger scales ranging from European through Palaearctic to the world fauna. It is envisaged that the checklist will be updated regularly to keep abreast of published changes and suggested amendments from correspondents. To this end, comments on the checklist are welcome and should be addressed to the Editor by e-mail to [email protected]. Scope The checklist aims to include all species that have been reliably recorded from the British Isles as possible residents. Exotic species which are only known from casual importation, and have never formed established populations, are listed in an appendix. The British Isles is here taken to include Great Britain and Ireland, including the Isle of Man but not the Channel Islands. The checklist aims to be comprehensive in its listing of subfamilies, genera and species. Tribes and subtribes are only listed when supported by a recent, authoritative review. Contemporary checklists vary in the extent to which they include subgenera and many subgeneric classifications are old and in need of review. Consequently, subgenera have only been listed when they enjoy current and widespread usage. Rationale It is considered that there are two main uses for a checklist: .
Recommended publications
  • HELFORD Voluntary Marine Conservation Area Newsletter No

    HELFORD Voluntary Marine Conservation Area Newsletter No

    HELFORD Voluntary Marine Conservation Area Newsletter No. 36 Spring 2008 Visitors to Constantine Choughs © RSPB In little more than 10 years Little Egrets have become well-established, with hundreds of nesting pairs nationwide. The Choughs will take a little longer, but have already raised 32 young on the Lizard peninsula in the first six years – a success rate none of us would have dared to expect. So, for our next trick…. the Cattle Egret? Since November there has been an unprecedented Little egret © D Chapman influx to our shores of these small, warm-weather herons. Once upon a time – a year or two ago, say! – Are we heading for a happy hat-trick of rarities in this the chance of seeing even a single Cattle Egret would corner of Cornwall – a third breeding bird success fetch out every battalion of the Twitchers’ Army. But story? now…. with more than 30 of these beautiful birds in Cornwall quietly feeding all the way from Bude In the last few years we have seen the arrival in or to Buryan, the Cattle Egret-shaped future must look near the Helford of Little Egrets, first to feed and promising. shelter and now to nest; and the re-arrival after more than 50 years’ absence of the county’s totemic Cattle Egrets are easy to differentiate from those Little Chough. Egrets already familiar along our muddy foreshores: Aim: To safeguard the marine life of the Helford River by any appropriate means within its status as a Voluntary Marine Conservation Area, to increase the diversity of its intertidal community and raise awareness of its marine interest and importance.
  • Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Rasa Bukontaite1,2*, Kelly B Miller3 and Johannes Bergsten1

    Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Rasa Bukontaite1,2*, Kelly B Miller3 and Johannes Bergsten1

    Bukontaite et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2014, 14:5 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/14/5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The utility of CAD in recovering Gondwanan vicariance events and the evolutionary history of Aciliini (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) Rasa Bukontaite1,2*, Kelly B Miller3 and Johannes Bergsten1 Abstract Background: Aciliini presently includes 69 species of medium-sized water beetles distributed on all continents except Antarctica. The pattern of distribution with several genera confined to different continents of the Southern Hemisphere raises the yet untested hypothesis of a Gondwana vicariance origin. The monophyly of Aciliini has been questioned with regard to Eretini, and there are competing hypotheses about the intergeneric relationship in the tribe. This study is the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis focused on the tribe Aciliini and it is based on eight gene fragments. The aims of the present study are: 1) to test the monophyly of Aciliini and clarify the position of the tribe Eretini and to resolve the relationship among genera within Aciliini, 2) to calibrate the divergence times within Aciliini and test different biogeographical scenarios, and 3) to evaluate the utility of the gene CAD for phylogenetic analysis in Dytiscidae. Results: Our analyses confirm monophyly of Aciliini with Eretini as its sister group. Each of six genera which have multiple species are also supported as monophyletic. The origin of the tribe is firmly based in the Southern Hemisphere with the arrangement of Neotropical and Afrotropical taxa as the most basal clades suggesting a Gondwana vicariance origin. However, the uncertainty as to whether a fossil can be used as a stem-or crowngroup calibration point for Acilius influenced the result: as crowngroup calibration, the 95% HPD interval for the basal nodes included the geological age estimate for the Gondwana break-up, but as a stem group calibration the basal nodes were too young.
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity

    The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity

    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
  • References Affiliations

    References Affiliations

    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/20872 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Lommen, Suzanne Theresia Esther Title: Exploring and exploiting natural variation in the wings of a predatory ladybird beetle for biological control Issue Date: 2013-05-16 References Abouheif E (2004) A framework for studying the evolution of gene networks underlying polyphenism: insights from winged and wingless ant castes. In: Hall BK (ed) Environment, development, and evolution. MIT Press, pp. 125-137 Abouheif E, Wray GA (2002) Evolution of the gene network underlying wing polyphenism in ants. Science 297:249-252 Adachi-Hagimori T, Shibao M, Tanaka H, Seko T, Miura K (2011) Control of Myzus persicae and Lipaphis erysimi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) by adults and larvae of a flightless strain of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on non-heading Brassica cultivars in the greenhouse. BioControl 56:207-213 Agarwala BK, Dixon AFG (1992) Laboratory study of cannibalism and interspecific predation in ladybirds. Ecol. Entomol. 17:303-309 Anbesse SA, Strauch O, Ehlers R-U (2012) Genetic improvement of the biological control nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditidomorpha: Heterorhabditidae): heterosis effect enhances desiccation but not heat tolerance. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 22:1035-1045 Arnaud L, Spinneux Y, Haubruge E (2003) Preliminary observations of sperm storage in Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae): sperm size and number. Appl. Entomol. Zoolog. 38:301-304 Atallah J, Dworkin I, Cheung U, Greene A, Ing B, Leung L, Larsen E (2004) The environmental and genetic regulation of obake expressivity: morphogenetic fields as evolvable systems. Evol. Dev. 6:114-122 Bakker FM, Klein ME, Mesa NC, Braun AR (1993) Saturation deficit tolerance spectra of phytophagous mites and their phytoseiid predators on cassava.
  • Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Jamaica and Puerto Rico, with a Discussion of Wing Dimorphism*

    Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Jamaica and Puerto Rico, with a Discussion of Wing Dimorphism*

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carleton University's Institutional Repository NEW RECORDS AND SPECIES OF LEIODINAE AND CATOPINAE (COLEOPTERA: LEIODIDAE) FROM JAMAICA AND PUERTO RICO, WITH A DISCUSSION OF WING DIMORPHISM* BY STEWART B. PECK Department of Biology, Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada Since my earlier reports on the Leiodidae of Jamaica and Puerto Rico (Peck, 1970, 1972), I have had the opportunity to spend an additional 13 weeks in field work on these islands. In Jamaica this was from mid-December to mid-January, 1972-1973, and from late July to early September, 1974. In Puerto Rico it was from early to late May, 1973, and a week in June, 1974. This has resulted in new data on the leiodids of these islands, which are presented here. Ad- ditional data and information on forest habitat sites may be found in Peck and Kukalova-Peck (1975), and on cave sites in Peck (1974, 1975). Methods and materials are similar to those utilized for my earlier papers. Collections were primarily made in forests with pitfall traps baited with carrion and human dung (Newton and Peck, 1975); by Berlese-Tullgren funnel extraction of arthropods from sifted forest litter, and from bat guano accumulations in caves. In this work, 259 kg (770 liters) of sifted forest litter were processed for Jamaica and 93 kg (171 liters) for Puerto Rico, in addition to many other extractions from samples of bat guano. Most of the arthropod residues from these collections are deposited with the Field Mu- seum (Chicago).
  • Effects of Urbanisation and Urban Areas on Biodiversity

    Effects of Urbanisation and Urban Areas on Biodiversity

    From genes to habitats – effects of urbanisation and urban areas on biodiversity Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaflichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Gwendoline (Wendy) Altherr aus Trogen, Appenzell-Ausserrhoden Basel, 2007 Genehmigt von der Philosophisch–Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Peter Nagel, Prof. Dr. Patricia Holm, Prof. (em.) Dr. Bernhard Klausnitzer Basel, den 18. September 2007 Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Hauri Dekan TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 1 General introduction – biodiversity in the city 3 Chapter I – genetic diversity 21 Population genetic structure of the wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) in an urban environment Manuscript Chapter II – species diversity 47 How do small urban forest patches contribute to the biodiversity 47 of the arthropod fauna? Manuscript Leistus fulvibarbis Dejean – Wiederfund einer verschollenen 79 Laufkäferart (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in der Schweiz Veröffentlicht in den Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 56(4), 2006 Chapter III – habitat diversity 89 How do stakeholders and the legislation influence the allocation of green space on brownfield redevelopment projects? Five case studies from Switzerland, Germany and the UK Published in Business Strategy and the Environment 16, 2007 General discussion and conclusions 109 Acknowledgements 117 Curriculum Vitae 119 SUMMARY Urban areas are landscapes dominated by built-up structures for human use. Nevertheless, nature can still be found within these areas. Urban ecosystems can offer ecological niches, sometimes only found in cities. This biodiversity in the form of genetic diversity, species diversity and habitat diversity provided the structure of this thesis. First, we studied the effects of urbanisation on genetic diversity. We analysed the population structure of the wall lizard with highly variable genetic markers.
  • Biodiversity Action Plan 2011-2014

    Biodiversity Action Plan 2011-2014

    Falkirk Area Biodiversity Action Plan 2011-2014 A NEFORA' If you would like this information in another language, Braille, LARGE PRINT or audio, please call 01324 504863. For more information about this plan and how to get involved in local action for biodiversity contact: The Biodiversity Officer, Falkirk Council, Abbotsford House, David’s Loan, Falkirk FK2 7YZ E-mail: [email protected] www.falkirk.gov.uk/biodiversity Biodiversity is the variety of life. Biodiversity includes the whole range of life - mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, invertebrates, plants, trees, fungi and micro-organisms. It includes both common and rare species as well as the genetic diversity within species. Biodiversity also refers to the habitats and ecosystems that support these species. Biodiversity in the Falkirk area includes familiar landscapes such as farmland, woodland, heath, rivers, and estuary, as well as being found in more obscure places such as the bark of a tree, the roof of a house and the land beneath our feet. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in our lives. A healthy and diverse natural environment is vital to our economic, social and spiritual well being, both now and in the future. The last 100 years have seen considerable declines in the numbers and health of many of our wild plants, animals and habitats as human activities place ever-increasing demands on our natural resources. We have a shared responsibility to conserve and enhance our local biodiversity for the good of current and future generations. For more information
  • Dartington Report on Beetles 2015

    Dartington Report on Beetles 2015

    Report on beetles (Coleoptera) collected from the Dartington Hall Estate, 2015 by Dr Martin Luff 1. Introduction and Methods The majority of beetle recording in 2015 was concentrated on three sites and habitats: 1. Further sampling of moss on the Deer Park wall (SX794635), as mentioned in my 2014 report. This was done on two dates in March by MLL and again in October, aided by Messrs Tony Allen and Clive Turner, both experienced coleopterists. 2. Beetles associated with the decomposing body of a dead deer. The recently (accidentally) killed deer was acquired on 12th May by Mike Newby who pegged it out under wire netting in the small wood adjacent to 'Flushing Meadow', here referred to as 'Flushing Copse' (SX802625). The body was lifted regularly and beaten over a collecting tray, initially every week, then fortnightly and then monthly until early October. In addition, two pitfall traps were installed just beside the corpse, with a small amount of preservative in each. These were emptied each time the site was visited. 3. Water beetles sampled on 28th October, together with Tony Allen and Clive Turner, from the ponds and wheel-rut puddles on Berryman's Marsh (SX799615). Other work again included the contents of the nest boxes from Dartington Hills and Berrymans Marsh at the end of October, thanks to Mike Newby and his volunteer helpers. 2. Results In all, 203 beetle species were recorded in 2015, of which 85 (41.8%) were additions to the Dartington list. This increase over the 32% new in 2014 (Luff, 2015) results partly from sampling habitats (carrion, fresh-water) not previously examined.
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G

    A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
  • Rose Stem Girdler, a New Pest of Caneberries & Roses Jean R

    Rose Stem Girdler, a New Pest of Caneberries & Roses Jean R

    Natter’s Notes Rose stem girdler, a new pest of caneberries & roses Jean R. Natter As insects go, rose stem borers, Agrilus cuprescens, (Fig 1) are small commonly grown in home gardens, including metallic beetles in the Family Buprestidae, about a 1/4-inch long when both raspberry (red and black) and mature. This imported European species attacks two favorite garden blackberry. Affected roses may be wild or plants: Roses and caneberries. Their larvae bore into the stems, cultivated kinds. eventually girdling them. The growth beyond that point wilts and dies. (Fig 2) The older name, Agrilus aurichalceus, is still used in various resources. Other common names include bronze cane borer, cane fruit borer, and raspberry borer. Facts about borers Before we delve into further details, we need to understand that all insects that bore into plants behave similarly. For rose stem borers, it’s Fig 1 – Damage to caneberry foliage by adult rose stem essentially this: girdlers, Agrilus cuprescens, is typically minor. (W. 1. Stressed plants release volatiles (e.g.: ethanol) to attract the pests. Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org) 2. The borers find the host by following a scent emitted by the plant. Damage 3. The beetles “taste” the plant and, if it’s suitable for attack – Affected canes develop a gall (enlargement) adequately stressed – release aggregation pheromones which attract at the feeding site which dries, weakens and more of their kin. may break. (Figs 4, 5) Fruit production may 4. After sufficient beetles have arrived, they release a “de- decrease. Caneberry plants with normally aggregation” pheromone which essentially says “Back off, dude.” lush growth may die.
  • IV Trobada D'estudiosos De La Serralada Litoral Central I VIII Del

    IV Trobada D'estudiosos De La Serralada Litoral Central I VIII Del

    Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals 7 IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor Col·lecció Eines Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals El 20 i 21 de novembre de 2019 va tenir lloc a Vallgorguina la IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor, amb l’objectiu de donar a conèixer els estudis i recerques duts a terme els últims quatre anys en diferents àmbits de les ciències socials i naturals del territori. En total es van presentar 47 comunicacions que van abordar temes rellevants i innovadors, però també estudis de base o projectes de gestió aplicada per a la conservació d’espècies o per al control d’espècies exòtiques, entre d’altres. Aquests treballs, que amb aquesta publicació tenim l’oportunitat de llegir amb detall, suposen una contribució inestimable per millorar el coneixement de la realitat d’aquests tres parcs, dels seus valors naturals, paisatgístics i culturals, i són de gran utilitat per al personal encarregat de gestionar-los i per a qualsevol persona interessada en la seva conservació. Col·lecció Eines Sèrie Territori i Parcs Naturals 7 IV Trobada d’Estudiosos de la Serralada Litoral Central i VIII del Montnegre i el Corredor Vallgorguina, 20 i 21 de novembre de 2019 Col·lecció Eines Primera edició: desembre de 2020 © dels textos: els seus autors © de l’edició: Diputació de Barcelona Coordinació: Gerència de Serveis d’Espais Naturals de la Diputació de Barcelona Producció: Gabinet de Premsa i Comunicació de la Diputació de Barcelona Composició: