DOCSLIB.ORG

A Palestinian Intellectual History, 1967-1974 Katlyn Maureen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Palestinian Intellectual History, 1967-1974 Katlyn Maureen View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Australian National University Writing the Resistance: A Palestinian Intellectual History, 1967-1974 Katlyn Maureen Quenzer January, 2019 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University © Copyright by Katlyn Maureen Quenzer 2019 All Rights Reserved Declaration I, Katlyn Maureen Quenzer, declare that this thesis is my own work. No material within it has been has been used for the award of any university degree or that of any higher learning institution. No material within it has been published previously or written by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgment has been given. ii Acknowledgments I thank God for giving me the health and wherewithal to carry this project through. Just shy of a year after meeting with Sadik al-Azm, he passed away. His thoughts and generous giving of his time have been indispensable to this thesis, and I am so grateful that I had the opportunity to meet him. Others too have passed, such as Clovis Maksoud. Their work, regardless of one’s approach, continues to be a resource to scholars and anyone with an interest in the Arab—Israeli conflict. I would like to thank the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (CAIS), who made this work possible. I am grateful to Professor Amin Saikal and Dr. Kirill Nourzhanov, who supported my application. I would also like to acknowledge the generous support given to me by the ANU University Research Scholarship as well as the Vice Chancellor Travel Grant. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the institutions that hosted me and allowed me to use their resources, particularly UC Berkeley’s Center for Middle East Studies, Dr. Emily Gottreich and Dr. Peter Bartu in particular. I am indebted to my supervisory panel. I thank my primary supervisor and chair of my panel, Professor James Piscatori, for all his advice and attention, close readings, and feedback. His encouragement and keen eye helped to see the project through. I also enjoyed his captivating stories, about which he should write a book. I also thank my external supervisor, Dr. Bashir Abu-Manneh, whose course during my undergraduate days at Barnard really woke me up and in large part led me to further my academic studies. He has given me more of his time iii than I deserve, and his immense knowledge of Palestinian and Arab intellectual work has helped guide me throughout and has provided me with invaluable feedback. I also warmly thank my supervisor Ms. France Meyer, whose assistance in locating key texts and libraries was vital. I greatly appreciate her encouragement and care throughout this project, as well as her vast knowledge of the world of translation. I would like to thank and acknowledge those who gave their time to be interviewed. Their contributions contributed to the richness of the story I had to tell. I thank Dr. Minerva Nasser-Eddine for her hard work and help during her time as my supervisor at CAIS. This thesis has benefited from the editorial work of Dr. Elisabeth Yarbakhsh, who provided assistance in copyediting. I thank Dr. Alina Sajid, who provided helpful feedback on a chapter and has been a support in scholastic efforts surrounding my thesis. I thank my friends for their sincere kindness, generous support, and patience. I am grateful to Sima for all the time and care she has given me. I thank Maria, Niken, Peony, Caroline, Nebiha, and Farida for showering me with support. I also thank Jessie and Raihan, who took the time to give helpful research advice throughout this process. I am grateful to the patience and thorough advice of Elisabeth, whose help and support toward the end was indispensable. I thank my neighbor, Helen, who kindly volunteered to read and comment on a chapter. I would like to acknowledge the help and kindness of my whole family. Thanks, more than I can say, to my mother for being a support and nurturer throughout this process. I thank my father for all his encouragement and counsel in seeing this project through, and my brother iv for tolerating my late-night writing sessions. I want to thank my grandmother, whose encouragement and support of my scholastic endeavors has helped lead me to undertake doctoral research. I would also like to thank Aunt Liza and Uncle David, whose dining room table I occupied for many hours a day, writing! I am grateful for my husband’s support as well as his helpful advice on my research. I also had the pleasure of receiving support from his family—my encouraging mother-in-law and sister-in-law and Uncle Ali, who shared his knowledge on all things Ghassan Kanafani. v Abstract This thesis explores the ideological work of the intellectuals involved in the Palestinian Resistance, and the Palestinian Liberation Organization more specifically, from 1967 to 1974. In particular, it sets out to answer the following question: What were the changing roles of the intellectuals involved in the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) from 1967 to 1974, particularly in relation to anti-colonial politics, and why did they change? Being a particularly fertile time in Palestinian resistance history, many of those involved in the movement had the opportunity to explore new ideological possibilities for resistance and worked to link their movement ideologically to revolutionary resistance movements taking place globally at that time. The 1967 defeat was particularly poignant for Palestinian and Arab intellectuals, as it demonstrated to them that the work of the Ba'thists and Arab nationalists during the 1950s and 1960s had not created the necessary changes to liberate Palestine and, in their opinions, to liberate the entire society. Such changes, the intellectuals had hoped, would bring forth a larger revolution for the Arab world. With criticisms of local regimes, the intervention of external governments, and Zionism itself, they worked to reshape Palestinian resistance and reimagine Arab liberation. Yet due to fractured relationships and general disunity, it became difficult to create the type of resistance they had imagined. Three factors have seemed constraining: the shortcomings of the intellectuals, external factors, and problems in the ideas they developed for their society. Along with presenting the research question and hypothesis and defining key terms, the Introduction provides a literature review. The rest of the thesis chapters are arranged vi thematically and chronologically. Chapter One provides historical links between this newer generation of intellectuals and the older generation at the end of the Ottoman Empire and the beginning of the Mandate period. In Chapter Two, the initial reactions to the 1967 Defeat and the unique opportunity the PLO and its leaders had following it are analysed. Chapter Three considers the factionalism that took place within the PLO and the various ideological streams that were born of this. Chapter Four explicates the particular reasons why the ideologies they developed were troubled from the start, as well as some of the fundamental ironies within them. In addition to the possibility that their ideas did not suit the needs of the population in part because they did not have mass support, Chapter Five raises the notion that the efforts of the PLO’s intellectuals may have been overly quixotic, as some have argued. The Conclusion suggests that, in many ways, the period ends as it begins, with their dreams of revolution as dreams and their criticisms of the society and each other as they were after soon after the Defeat. vii Transliteration Note Within the text body, the transliteration of Arabic words and names can be variable. This thesis does not follow any systematic approach, but uses common spellings that have regularly appeared in English-language media and other publications (for example: Sadik al-Azm, Shafiq al-Hout, and fedayeen). This was done in large part for ease of reading. Nonetheless, in order to aid the reader in any further research, I have transliterated the titles of the Arabic texts and their publishers within the citations and bibliography. I used the Library of Congress guide for Arabic transliteration. Authors names, however, remain in the simplified form as in the text, to avoid confusion. The transliterated title and publisher along with the commonly-held author’s name will be sufficient in locating the texts. Additionally, within the references I have used the Library of Congress guide to transliterate lesser-known authors’ names. Finally, publishers who have a standardised transliteration of their publishing house are maintained (for example, Riad El-Rayyes rather than Riāḍ al-Raīs). viii Abbreviations Arab Nationalist Movement ANM Democratic Front for the Liberation of DFLP Palestine Front de Libération National FLN Palestine Liberation Front PLF Palestinian National Council PNC Palestine Research Center PRC Palestinian Liberation Organization PLO Palestinian National Liberation Movement Fatah Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine PFLP Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine—General Command PFLP—GC United Arab Republic UAR ix Contents Declaration .................................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ iii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Print This Article
    New Middle Eastern Studies Publication details, including guidelines for submissions: http://www.brismes.ac.uk/nmes/ White Flag of Resistance Author(s): Yonatan Mendel To cite this article: Mendel, Yonatan, ‘White Flag of Resistance’, New Middle Eastern Studies, 1 (2011), <http://www.brismes.ac.uk/nmes/archives/727>. To link to this article: http://www.brismes.ac.uk/nmes/archives/727 Online Publication Date: 20 December 2011 Disclaimer and Copyright The NMES editors and the British Society for Middle Eastern Studies make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information contained in the e-journal. However, the editors and the British Society for Middle Eastern Studies make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any purpose of the content and disclaim all such representations and warranties whether express or implied to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and not the views of the Editors or the British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Copyright New Middle Eastern Studies, 2011. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from New Middle Eastern Studies, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed, in writing. Terms and conditions: This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser
    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intifadah and the 1936-1939 Uprising: a Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities 1
    The Intifadah and the 1936-1939 Uprising: A Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities 1 Kenneth W. Stein The Carter Center March, 1990 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Part I-Similarities 3. Part II-Comparisons I. Palestinian Leadership II. Character and Participation III. The Islamic Dimension IV. Duration and Effects 4. Part III - Conclusions 5. About the Author Executive Summary When comparing the 1936-1939 Palestinian uprising in various parts of western Palestine to the present intifadah, 2 taking place in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, the most striking conclusion is the large number of general similarities between these two manifestations of Palestinian national consciousness. 3 The two most significant differences between the uprisings, however, are first, that the intifadah generated a deeper and more prolonged Palestinian national coherence across all classes than did its predecessor. Second, the intifadah clarified and crystallized Palestinian opinion which in conjunction with other events helped to create a historic compromise in Palestinian public policy. Other major differences between the two uprisings are self-evident. Many pertain to the political environments in which both uprisings unfolded. During the 1936-1939 uprising, there were no existing UN resolutions about Palestine. There was no Israel, no Israeli Arab population, no Palestinian political organization of the stature and strength of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), no decade-old Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty as a backdrop to an ongoing larger negotiating process, no decision made by the Hashemites in the midst of the uprising to place the responsibility of diplomatic progress on the shoulders of the Palestinian leadership, no willingness by a significant number of leading Palestinian Arab politicians to accept a Jewish state in a portion of Palestine, and no corresponding willingness on the part of an equally important number of Zionist/Israel leaders to assent to the legitimacy of Palestinian national aspirations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian People
    The Palestinian People The Palestinian People ❖ A HISTORY Baruch Kimmerling Joel S. Migdal HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2003 Copyright © 1994, 2003 by Baruch Kimmerling and Joel S. Migdal All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America An earlier version of this book was published in 1994 as Palestinians: The Making of a People Cataloging-in-Publication data available from the Library of Congress ISBN 0-674-01131-7 (cloth) ISBN 0-674-01129-5 (paper) To the Palestinians and Israelis working and hoping for a mutually acceptable, negotiated settlement to their century-long conflict CONTENTS Maps ix Preface xi Acknowledgments xxi Note on Transliteration xxiii Introduction xxv Part One FROM REVOLT TO REVOLT: THE ENCOUNTER WITH THE EUROPEAN WORLD AND ZIONISM 1. The Revolt of 1834 and the Making of Modern Palestine 3 2. The City: Between Nablus and Jaffa 38 3. Jerusalem: Notables and Nationalism 67 4. The Arab Revolt, 1936–1939 102 vii Contents Part Two DISPERSAL 5. The Meaning of Disaster 135 Part Three RECONSTITUTING THE PALESTINIAN NATION 6. Odd Man Out: Arabs in Israel 169 7. Dispersal, 1948–1967 214 8. The Feday: Rebirth and Resistance 240 9. Steering a Path under Occupation 274 Part Four ABORTIVE RECONCILIATION 10. The Oslo Process: What Went Right? 315 11. The Oslo Process: What Went Wrong? 355 Conclusion 398 Chronological List of Major Events 419 Notes 457 Index 547 viii MAPS 1. Palestine under Ottoman Rule 39 2. Two Partitions of Palestine (1921, 1949) 148 3. United Nations Recommendation for Two-States Solution in Palestine (1947) 149 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Palestine Studies, 2006 (Pp
    al-Yahya, ͑Abd al-Razzaq. Bayn al- ͑Askariya wa-l-Siyasa. Beirut: Institute for Palestine studies, 2006 (pp. 105-113). Translated by The Palestinian Revolution.1 I was engaged in the work of the Association alongside the steps of establishing the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) – yet these two processes were inherently linked. A third was also added to the mix, namely my following of the movement characterised by the establishment of disparate factions calling for armed struggle, and the conflicts and competitions that started to spring up between them. The community of Palestinian elites in that period operated much like a beehive, its activity non-stop day and night. During the preparations for the General Conference, Ahmad al-Shuqairi said yes to practically everyone who asked to be represented; this meant that it ended up being an amalgamation of various familial, provincial, regional, Palestinian nationalist, and Arab nationalist leanings. Our group, meanwhile, were keen for the Conference to be limited to those with political roles and ideas. Nimr al-Masri, who became al-Shuqairi’s right-hand man, was also of this opinion, but he did not clash with the president whose view was so different. Among the various sides that were spoken for at the conference (whether they deserved to be or not), our group of officers from the course [in Qatana] had a certain share of representation. Considering how many officers we had attending, this share was a decent one; in fact, the number of our officers surpassed the number of representatives of any participating armed faction or party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arab Uprisings, One Year on | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds The Arab Uprisings, One Year On by Robert Satloff Dec 15, 2011 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Robert Satloff Robert Satloff is executive director of The Washington Institute, a post he assumed in January 1993. Articles & Testimony The Middle East begins 2012 much as it began 1949, 1968, and 1980: confident only that uncertainty is the new norm. t is now commonplace to note that, like 1948, 1967 and 1979, the year that was -- 2011 -- will go down as a year of I seismic change in the Middle East. But what sort of change will it leave in its wake? The term most often associated with the events of the last year -- the "Arab Spring" -- provides virtually no clue. That phrase, borrowed from a hopeful moment in Prague that was crushed by Soviet tanks more than a generation ago, was first used in the Middle East context in 2005. That was when the assassination of Rafik Hariri triggered an outpouring of Lebanese "people power" that drove Syrian troops out of that country and raised hopes of a truly new dawn in Lebanon after its bloody 30-year war. In retrospect, its usage was tragically apt, in that Hezbollah -- like the Soviets -- eventually triumphed, putting off until another day the potential for truly positive change. One doubts that the Facebookers and Twitterati who celebrate the Arab Spring of 2011 recall this unhappy history. "Arab Awakening" is the second term whose use is increasing -- not least because commentators have been told that many Middle Eastern countries, especially Egypt, have only two real seasons, neither of which is spring.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Sarah R. Irving Intellectual networks, language and knowledge under colonialism: the work of Stephan Stephan, Elias Haddad and Tawfiq Canaan in Palestine, 1909-1948 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Literatures, Languages and Cultures University of Edinburgh 2017 Declaration: This is to certify that that the work contained within has been composed by me and is entirely my own work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Signed: 16th August 2017 2 Intellectual networks, language and knowledge under colonialism: the work of Stephan Stephan, Elias Haddad and Tawfiq Canaan in Palestine, 1909-1948 Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Documents. Pm CENTER for AREA ANDCOUNTRY STUDIES
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 019 195 SO 005 926, AUTHOR Howard, Harry TITLE Near East and North Africa: A Question Syllabus. Center for Area and CoUntry Studies.. INSTITUTION 'Foreign Service (Dept.of State), Washington, D.C. Foreign Service Inst. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 48p. EARS PRICE ME-$0.65 HC -$3.29 DESCRIPTORS African History; Arabs; *Area Studies; Bibliographic Citations; Curriculum Guides; *Developing Nations; Economic Change;. Economic Progress; *Foreign Culture; Foreign Relations; Geography; Human Geography; Islamic Culture; Jews; Middle Eastern History; *Middle Eastern Studies; Non Western Civilization; Periodicals; Politics <i ABSTRACT' This study syllabus on the Near East and North Africa is divided into twelve units. D'es,igned to familiarize government personnel assigned to the, area with, the region and people, each unit consists of a statement of the main objectives to be studied, questions for consideration, and' a list of suggested readings from books and periodicals..Units.are: "Historical Backgrounds in the Middle East," "The Geopolitical Significance of the.Middle East," The Impact of the'West on the Middle EaSt," "Nationalism in the Middle Easts" The Ideological Revolution in the 'Middle East; "' - "Types of Middle Easterfi Societies," "The Northern Tier of the Middle EaSts" "Israel as a Nation State," "The Middle East in Conflict," "American Interest and Policy in the Middle. East," "The Arabian Peninsulas," and, "North Africa. 1 SO 005 925, SO 005 913-919 are related documents. pm CENTER FOR AREA ANDCOUNTRY STUDIES NEAR EAST AND NORTHAFRICA A QUESTION SYLLABUS U.S.OEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION:. WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EOU:AT ION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEENREPRO DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVEDFROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEWOR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY STUDY 'SYLLABUS NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA UNIT I.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Palestinian Unity After the Arab Spring
    Prospects for Palestinian Unity After the Arab Spring Prospects for Palestinian Unity After the Arab Spring YOUSEF MUNAYYER* ABSTRACT If the revolutions sweeping then Arab world are in fact its n May 4, 2011, the Palestinian fac- “spring” then the Hamas/Fateh tions Fateh and Hamas signed a reconciliationO agreement ending a four-year reconciliation deal may very well be the first buds this season division, which debilitated Palestinian domestic produced. Whether or not this politics and national strategy. The agreement, reconciliation deal will bear any signed with much fanfare in a post-Mubarak fruit for the Palestinian people, Cairo, raised hopes as well as questions. Could however, is yet to be seen. To best this really be the end of division between bit- understand the factors affecting the success of the deal, one must ter rivals and the start of a unified Palestinian have grasp of the history of the movement? How will such an agreement be relationship between Hamas and tested over time? How will Washington and Tel Fatah and the role of external Aviv respond to the agreement, and how does actors in that relationship as this all relate to the “Arab Spring?” well. In this commentary I lay out a history of tensions and These many questions are as interesting the role of the US and Israel as they are important. To attempt to provide in driving wedges between answers to them requires an understanding of the parties. Similar challenges the genesis of the division between these two will undoubtedly face this Palestinian factions, the history of their rela- reconciliation attempt and the greatest chances of success can be tionship prior to the recent period, and the dif- achieved when both parties put ferences in both interests and ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian) Space: Sayed Kashua’S Chronotopic Approach in Let It Be Morning Sadia Agsous École Des Hautes Études En Sciences Sociales
    Hegemonic (Israeli) Time and Minority (Palestinian) Space: Sayed Kashua’s Chronotopic Approach in Let It Be Morning Sadia Agsous École des hautes études en sciences sociales abstract: Sayed Kashua, a Palestinian writer in Israel who has published novels exclusively in Hebrew, was celebrated as a successful writer and journalist in the Hebrew literary field. If the author’s usage of Hebrew and his novels were examined from an Israeli and a Jewish perspective and from the prospects of minority speech acts, these critics did, however, situate his literature within the immediate political context, that of the impossible situation of Palestinians in Israel. This article reads his second from a different perspective and considers Kashua’s ,(ויהי בוקר) novel, Let It Be Morning literary strategy that consists in transforming a futuristic and allegorist perspective into a chronotope set between hegemonic (Israeli) time and minority (Palestinian) space. This novel highlights, between text and context, different visions of the future: a dystopian situation reflecting both a disastrous outcome of the Zionist wing call- ing for the transfer of the Palestinians and an internal conflict between Palestinians (fitnah); the utopian vision of the writer, who used his writing in Hebrew to create a hybrid space of negotiation with the Hebrew reader and therefore suggesting literature as a way to prevent dystopia. This article emphasizes a futuristic storytelling from its content to its form used by Kashua as a literary strategy to express the impossibility of a Palestinian voice, his voice, in Hebrew fiction. dibur literary journal Issue 6, Fall 2018 Visions of the Future 20 dibur a palestinian hybrid text, between a dystopian future and the utopia of the writer At long last, the Zionist dream is coming true.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Al-Khatib, Ahmad. Kuwait
    al-Khatib, Ahmad. Kuwait: Min Al-Imara Ila al-Dawla, Dhakariyat al- ʿAmal al-Watani wa-l-Qawmi. Beirut: The Arab Cultural Center, 2007 (pp. 72-83). Translated by The Palestinian Revolution, 2016 1 The Nakba, the Juncture, and the Birth of the Nationalist Youth There is no doubt that the United Nations decision to partition Palestine in 1947, the establishment of Israel in 1948, along with the Arab military defeat at the hands of the Zionists, created a total turnaround in our way of thinking. On a personal level, the impact of it was almost unutterably strong. Perhaps its bearing on me was so deep – and so personal – because I witnessed my Palestinian friends who were studying with me losing everything overnight, going every day to the Palestinian borders to search for their families amongst the displaced. I used to share all of that with them. I lived through the sad and painful reception of refugees, I went with them to the makeshift camps that had been set up for them, and saw how the families were squashed together in the tents, and the tiny units separated into individual dwellings with sheets. Every ‘dwelling’ housed one family, and open sewers ran through the middle of the units and between the tents. I sometimes saw two families living in one tent. Even though we hadn’t yet qualified as doctors, we had no choice but to provide medical treatment for the refugees. Owing to malnutrition – or at times lack of nutrition – and the lack of sanitation in people’s homes, tuberculosis began to spread through the camps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Arabic Among Jews and Christians (1900–1950)
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/156224 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-30 and may be subject to change. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies ISSN: 1353-0194 (Print) 1469-3542 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbjm20 The Language of the Nation: The Rise of Arabic among Jews and Christians (1900–1950) Heleen Murre-van den Berg To cite this article: Heleen Murre-van den Berg (2016) The Language of the Nation: The Rise of Arabic among Jews and Christians (1900–1950), British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 43:2, 176-190, DOI: 10.1080/13530194.2016.1138641 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2016.1138641 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by British Society for Middle Eastern Studies Published online: 25 Jan 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1247 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cbjm20 BRITISH JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 43, NO. 2, 176–190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2016.1138641 OPEN ACCESS The Language of the Nation: The Rise of Arabic among Jews and Christians (1900–1950) Heleen Murre-van den Berg Institute for Eastern Christian Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ABSTRACT This essay explores the ways in which in the period following the First World War, non-Muslim communities participated in the establishment of Modern Standard Arabic as the foremost symbol of the new states that replaced the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]