DOCSLIB.ORG

10 and –35 As Shown in Figure 11-11?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10 and –35 As Shown in Figure 11-11? 11 Regulation of Gene Expression in Bacteria and Their Viruses WORKING WITH THE FIGURES 1. Compare the structure of IPTG shown in Figure 11-7 with the structure of galactose shown in Figure 11-5. Why is IPTG bound by the lac repressor but not broken down by -galactosidase? Answer: The sulfur atom in IPTG prevents hydrolysis by the beta-galactosidase enzyme. 2. Looking at Figure 11-9, why were partial diploids essential for establishing the trans-acting nature of the lac repressor? Could one distinguish cis-acting from transacting genes in haploids? Answer: Partial diploids were essential for distinguishing cis-acting from trans- acting mutants, because by definition one must introduce a second copy of the locus in trans to test this property of the mutants. 3. Why do promoter mutations cluster at positions –10 and –35 as shown in Figure 11-11? Answer: Promoter mutations cluster around the –10 and –35 positions because these are the DNA sequences recognized and bound by the sigma subunit of the polymerase. Alterations to these sequences will affect the ability of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme to recognize the promoter. 4. Looking at Figure 11-16, how large is the overlap between the operator and the lac transcription unit? Answer: The operator sequence overlaps the lac operon transcription unit by 24 base pairs. 314 Chapter Eleven 5. Examining Figure 11-21, what effect do you predict trpA mutations will have on tryptophan levels? Answer: Mutations that inactivate the trpA gene will block the synthesis of tryptophan in the cells, resulting in trp auxotrophs. 6. Examining Figure 11-21, what effect do you predict trpA mutations have on trp mRNA expression? Answer: Because the trpA gene is the last to be transcribed, mutations in the trpA would not be predicted to affect transcription of the operon. BASIC PROBLEMS 7. Explain why I– alleles in the lac system are normally recessive to I+ alleles and why I+ alleles are recessive to IS alleles. Answer: The I gene determines the synthesis of a repressor molecule, which blocks expression of the lac operon and which is inactivated by the inducer. The presence of the repressor I+ will be dominant to the absence of a repressor I–. Is mutants are unresponsive to an inducer. For this reason, the gene product cannot be stopped from interacting with the operator and blocking the lac operon. Therefore, Is is dominant to I+. 8. What do we mean when we say that OC mutations in the lac system are cis- acting? Answer: Oc mutants are changes in the DNA sequence of the operator that impair the binding of the lac repressor. Therefore, the lac operon associated with the Oc operator cannot be turned off. Because an operator controls only the genes on the same DNA strand, it is cis (on the same strand) and dominant (cannot be turned off). Unpacking the Problem 9. The genes shown in the following table are from the lac operon system of E. coli. The symbols a, b, and c represent the repressor (I) gene, the operator (O) region, and the structural gene (Z) for -galactosidase, although not necessarily in that order. Furthermore, the order in which the symbols are written in the genotypes is not necessarily the actual sequence in the lac operon. Activity (+) or inactivity (–) of Z gene Chapter Eleven 315 Genotype Inducer absent Inducer present a– b+ c+ + + a+ b+ c– + + a+ b– c– – – a+ b– c+/a– b+ c– + + a+ b+ c+/a– b– c– – + a+ b+ c–/a– b– c+ – + a– b+ c+/a+ b– c– + + a. State which symbol (a, b, or c) represents each of the lac genes I, O, and Z. b. In the table, a superscript minus sign on a gene symbol merely indicates a mutant, but you know that some mutant behaviors in this system are given special mutant designations. Use the conventional gene symbols for the lac operon to designate each genotype in the table. (Problem 9 is from J. Kuspira and G. W. Walker, Genetics: Questions and Problems. Copyright 1973 by McGraw-Hill.) Answer: a. You are told that a, b, and c represent lacI, lacO, and lacZ, but you do not know which is which. Both a– and c– have constitutive phenotypes (lines 1 and 2) and therefore must represent mutations in either the operator (lacO) or the repressor (lacI). b– (line 3) shows no ß-gal activity and by elimination must represent the lacZ gene. Mutations in the operator will be cis-dominant and will cause constitutive expression of the lacZ gene only if it’s on the same chromosome. Line 6 has c– on the same chromosome as b+ but the phenotype is still inducible (owing to c+ in trans). Line 7 has a– on the same chromosome as b+ and is constitutive even though the other chromosome is a+. Therefore a is lacO, c is lacI, and b is lacZ. b. Another way of labeling mutants of the operator is to denote that they lead to a constitutive phenotype; lacO– (or a–) can also be written as lacOC. There are also mutations of the repressor that fail to bind inducer (allolactose) as opposed to fail to bind DNA. These two classes have quite different phenotypes and are distinguished by lacIS (fails to bind allolactose and leads to a dominant uninducible phenotype in the presence of a wild-type operator) and lacI– (fails to bind DNA and is recessive). It is possible that line 3, line 4, and line 7 have lacIS mutations (because dominance cannot be ascertained in a cell that is also lacOC), but the other c– alleles must be lacI–. 10. The map of the lac operon is POZY 316 Chapter Eleven The promoter (P) region is the start site of transcription through the binding of the RNA polymerase molecule before actual mRNA production. Mutationally altered promoters (P–) apparently cannot bind the RNA polymerase molecule. Certain predictions can be made about the effect of P– mutations. Use your predictions and your knowledge of the lactose system to complete the following table. Insert a “+” where an enzyme is produced and a “–” where no enzyme is produced. The first one has been done as an example. -Galactosidase Permease Genotype No lactose Lactose No lactose Lactose I+ P+ O+ Z+ Y+/I+ P+ O+ Z+ Y+ – + – + a. I– P+ OC Z+ Y–/ I+ P+ O+ Z– Y+ b. I+ P– OC Z– Y+/I– P+ OC Z+ Y– c. IS P+ O+ Z+ Y–/I+ P+ O+ Z– Y+ d. IS P+ O+ Z+ Y+/I– P+ O+ Z+ Y+ e. I– P+ OC Z+ Y–/I– P+ O+ Z– Y+ f. I– P– O+ Z+ Y+/I– P+ OC Z+ Y– g. I+ P+ O+ Z– Y+/I– P+ O+ Z+ Y– Answer: ß-Galactosidase Permease Part No lactose Lactose No lactose Lactose a + + – + b + + – – c – – – – d – – – – e + + + + f + + – – g – + – + a. The OC mutation leads to the constitutive synthesis of ß-galactosidase because it is cis to a lacZ+ gene, but the permease is inducible because the lacY+ gene is cis to a wild-type operator. b. The lacP– mutation prevents transcription so only the genes cis to lacP+ will be transcribed. These genes are also cis to OC so the lacZ+ gene is transcribed constitutively. c. The lacIs is a trans-dominant mutation and prevents transcription from either operon. d. Same as part c. e. There is no functional repressor made (and one operator is mutant as well). Chapter Eleven 317 f. Same as part b. g. Both operators are wild type and the one functional copy of lacI will direct the synthesis of enough repressor to control both operons. 11. Explain the fundamental differences between negative control and positive control. Answer: A gene is turned off or inactivated by the “modulator” (usually called a repressor) in negative control, and the repressor must be removed for transcription to occur. A gene is turned on by the “modulator” (usually called an activator) in positive control, and the activator must be added or converted to an active form for transcription to occur. 12. Mutants that are lacY– retain the capacity to synthesize -galactosidase. However, even though the lacI gene is still intact, -galactosidase can no longer be induced by adding lactose to the medium. Explain. Answer: The lacY gene produces a permease that transports lactose into the cell. A cell containing a lacY– mutation cannot transport lactose into the cell, so ß-galactosidase will not be induced. (In wild-type cells, even when the repressor is present, there is still a small amount of transcription. This allows a small amount of baseline permease (and β-gal) expression. It is this low level of permease that allows trace amounts of lactose to enter the cell and initiate induction of the lac operon.) 13. What are the analogies between the mechanisms controlling the lac operon and those controlling phage genetic switches? Answer: Both the lac operon and phase genetic switches can be interpreted as a simple switch between two states. For , there is competition between Cro and cI proteins binding at an operator to control the choice between the lysogenic and lytic life cycles. For the lac operon, a repressor binds at the operator to prevent transcription of the structural genes in the absence of lactose. Both also are capable of interpreting their environments and directing an “appropriate” response. The lac operon responds to the presence or absence of lactose and glucose. For , if resources are abundant, or the bacterial cell sustains DNA damage, the lytic cycle prevails, but if resources are not abundant, will enter the lysogenic cycle.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Galactosidase
    Copyright 0 1988 by the Genetics Society of America Effects of Amino Acid Substitutions atthe Active Site in Escherichia coli @-Galactosidase Claire G. Cupples and Jeffrey H. Miller Molecular Biology Institute and Department of Biology, University of Calqornia, Los Angeles, Calqornia 90024 Manuscript received April 2 1, 1988 Accepted July 23, 1988 ABSTRACT Forty-nine amino acid substitutions were made at four positions in the Escherichia coli enzyme p- galactosidase; three of the four targeted amino acids are thought to be part of the active site. Many of the substitutions were made by converting the appropriate codon in lacZ to an amber codon, and using one of 12 suppressor strains to introduce the replacement amino acid. Glu-461 and Tyr-503 were replaced, independently, with 13 amino acids. All 26 of the strains containing mutant enzymes are Lac-. Enzyme activity is reduced to less than 10% of wild type by substitutions at Glu-461 and to less than 1% of wild type by substitutions at Tyr-503. Many of the mutant enzymes have less than 0.1 % wild-type activity. His-464 and Met-3 were replaced with 1 1and 12 amino acids, respectively. Strains containing any one of these mutant proteins are Lac+. The results support previous evidence that Glu-46 1 and Tyr-503 areessential for catalysis, and suggest that His-464 is not part of the active site. Site-directed mutagenesis was facilitated by construction of an fl bacteriophage containing the complete lacz gene on i single ECORIfragment. -GALACTOSIDASE (EC 3.2.1.23) is produced in and J.
    [Show full text]
  • BMB400 Part Four - II = Chpt
    BMB400 Part Four - II = Chpt. 17. Transcriptional regulation by effects on RNA polymerase B M B 400 Part Four: Gene Regulation Section II = Chapter 17. TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION EXERTED BY EFFECTS ON RNA POLYMERASE [Dr. Tracy Nixon made major contributions to this chapter.] A. The multiple steps in initiation and elongation by RNA polymerase are targets for regulation. 1. RNA Polymerase has to * bind to promoters, * form an open complex, * initiate transcription, * escape from the promoter, * elongate , and * terminate transcription. See Fig. 4.2.1. 2. Summarizing a lot of work, we know that: • strong promoters have high KB, high kf, low kr, and high rates of promoter clearance. • weak promoters have low KB, low kf, high kr, and low rates of promoter clearance. • moderate promoters have one or more "weak" spots. 3. To learn these facts, we need: • genetic data to identify which macromolecules (DNA and proteins) interact in a specific regulation event, and to determine which base pairs and amino acid residues are needed for that regulation event. • biochemical data to describe the binding events and chemical reactions that are affected by the specific regulation event. Ideally, we would determine all forward and reverse rate constants, or equilibrium constants (which are a function of the ratio of rate constants) if rates are inaccessible. Although, in reality, we cannot get either rates or equilibrium constants for many of the steps, some of the steps are amenable to investigation and have proved to be quite informative about the mechanisms of regulation. BMB400 Part Four - II = Chpt. 17. Transcriptional regulation by effects on RNA polymerase Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Targets TFIID and TFIIA to Prevent Activated Transcription
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The mammalian transcriptional repressor RBP (CBF1) targets TFIID and TFIIA to prevent activated transcription Ivan Olave, Danny Reinberg,1 and Lynne D. Vales2 Department of Biochemistry and 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 USA RBP is a cellular protein that functions as a transcriptional repressor in mammalian cells. RBP has elicited great interest lately because of its established roles in regulating gene expression, in Drosophila and mouse development, and as a component of the Notch signal transduction pathway. This report focuses on the mechanism by which RBP represses transcription and thereby regulates expression of a relatively simple, but natural, promoter. The results show that, irrespective of the close proximity between RBP and other transcription factors bound to the promoter, RBP does not occlude binding by these other transcription factors. Instead, RBP interacts with two transcriptional coactivators: dTAFII110, a subunit of TFIID, and TFIIA to repress transcription. The domain of dTAFII110 targeted by RBP is the same domain that interacts with TFIIA, but is disparate from the domain that interacts with Sp1. Repression can be thwarted when stable transcription preinitiation complexes are formed before RBP addition, suggesting that RBP interaction with TFIIA and TFIID perturbs optimal interactions between these coactivators. Consistent with this, interaction between RBP and TFIIA precludes interaction with dTAFII110. This is the first report of a repressor specifically targeting these two coactivators to subvert activated transcription. [Key Words: RBP; transcriptional repression; TFIIA/TFIID targeting] Received November 17, 1997; revised version accepted April 1, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Cellular Signaling
    Martin Beckerman Molecular and Cellular Signaling With 227 Figures AIP PRESS 4(2) Springer Contents Series Preface Preface vii Guide to Acronyms xxv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes 1 1.2 The Cytoskeleton and Extracellular Matrix 2 1.3 Core Cellular Functions in Organelles 3 1.4 Metabolic Processes in Mitochondria and Chloroplasts 4 1.5 Cellular DNA to Chromatin 5 1.6 Protein Activities in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Golgi Apparatus 6 1.7 Digestion and Recycling of Macromolecules 8 1.8 Genomes of Bacteria Reveal Importance of Signaling 9 1.9 Organization and Signaling of Eukaryotic Cell 10 1.10 Fixed Infrastructure and the Control Layer 12 1.11 Eukaryotic Gene and Protein Regulation 13 1.12 Signaling Malfunction Central to Human Disease 15 1.13 Organization of Text 16 2. The Control Layer 21 2.1 Eukaryotic Chromosomes Are Built from Nucleosomes 22 2.2 The Highly Organized Interphase Nucleus 23 2.3 Covalent Bonds Define the Primary Structure of a Protein 26 2.4 Hydrogen Bonds Shape the Secondary Structure . 27 2.5 Structural Motifs and Domain Folds: Semi-Independent Protein Modules 29 xi xü Contents 2.6 Arrangement of Protein Secondary Structure Elements and Chain Topology 29 2.7 Tertiary Structure of a Protein: Motifs and Domains 30 2.8 Quaternary Structure: The Arrangement of Subunits 32 2.9 Many Signaling Proteins Undergo Covalent Modifications 33 2.10 Anchors Enable Proteins to Attach to Membranes 34 2.11 Glycosylation Produces Mature Glycoproteins 36 2.12 Proteolytic Processing Is Widely Used in Signaling 36 2.13 Reversible Addition and Removal of Phosphoryl Groups 37 2.14 Reversible Addition and Removal of Methyl and Acetyl Groups 38 2.15 Reversible Addition and Removal of SUMO Groups 39 2.16 Post-Translational Modifications to Histones .
    [Show full text]
  • Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 Function in Breast Cancer (Review)
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 57: 1085-1094, 2020 Polycomb repressor complex 2 function in breast cancer (Review) COURTNEY J. MARTIN and ROGER A. MOOREHEAD Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada Received July 10, 2020; Accepted September 7, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5122 Abstract. Epigenetic modifications are important contributors 1. Introduction to the regulation of genes within the chromatin. The poly- comb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) is a multi‑subunit protein Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation complex that is involved in silencing gene expression through and histone modifications, play an important role in gene the trimethylation of lysine 27 at histone 3 (H3K27me3). The regulation. The dysregulation of these modifications can dysregulation of this modification has been associated with result in pathogenicity, including tumorigenicity. Research tumorigenicity through the increased repression of tumour has indicated an important influence of the trimethylation suppressor genes via condensing DNA to reduce access to the modification at lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3) within transcription start site (TSS) within tumor suppressor gene chromatin. This methylation is involved in the repression promoters. In the present review, the core proteins of PRC2, as of multiple genes within the genome by condensing DNA well as key accessory proteins, will be described. In addition, to reduce access to the transcription start site (TSS) within mechanisms controlling the recruitment of the PRC2 complex gene promoter sequences (1). The recruitment of H1.2, an H1 to H3K27 will be outlined. Finally, literature identifying the histone subtype, by the H3K27me3 modification has been a role of PRC2 in breast cancer proliferation, apoptosis and suggested as a mechanism for mediating this compaction (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions for Practice Problems for Molecular Biology, Session 5
    Solutions to Practice Problems for Molecular Biology, Session 5: Gene Regulation and the Lac Operon Question 1 a) How does lactose (allolactose) promote transcription of LacZ? 1) Lactose binds to the polymerase and increases efficiency. 2) Lactose binds to a repressor protein, and alters its conformation to prevent it from binding to the DNA and interfering with the binding of RNA polymerase. 3) Lactose binds to an activator protein, which can then help the RNA polymerase bind to the promoter and begin transcription. 4) Lactose prevents premature termination of transcription by directly binding to and bending the DNA. Solution: 2) Lactose binds to a repressor protein, and alters its conformation to prevent it from binding to the DNA and interfering with the binding of RNA polymerase. b) What molecule is used to signal low glucose levels to the Lac operon regulatory system? 1) Cyclic AMP 2) Calcium 3) Lactose 4) Pyruvate Solution: 1) Cyclic AMP. Question 2 You design a summer class where you recreate experiments studying the lac operon in E. coli (see schematic below). In your experiments, the activity of the enzyme b-galactosidase (β -gal) is measured by including X-gal and IPTG in the growth media. X-gal is a lactose analog that turns blue when metabolisize by b-gal, but it does not induce the lac operon. IPTG is an inducer of the lac operon but is not metabolized by b-gal. I O lacZ Plac Binding site for CAP Pi Gene encoding β-gal Promoter for activator protein Repressor (I) a) Which of the following would you expect to bind to β-galactosidase? Circle all that apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Transcription in Real-Time
    Cent. Eur. J. Biol. • 3(1) • 2008 • 11-18 DOI: 10.2478/s11535-008-0001-1 Central European Journal of Biology Visualizing transcription in real-time Mini-Review Yehuda Brody, Yaron Shav-Tal* The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel Received 31 October 2007; Accepted 10 December 2007 Abstract: The transcriptional process is at the center of the gene expression pathway. In eukaryotes, the transcription of protein-coding genes into messenger RNAs is performed by RNA polymerase II. This enzyme is directed to bind at upstream gene sequences by the aid of transcription factors that assemble transcription-competent complexes. A series of biochemical and structural modifications render the polymerase transcriptionally active so that it can proceed from an initiation state into a functional elongating phase. Recent experi- mental efforts have attempted to visualize these processes as they take place on genes in living cells and to quantify the kinetics of in vivo transcription. Keywords: mRNA transcription • Nucleus • Live-cell imaging • Cellular dynamics © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1. Introduction review will describe the developments in the field of live-cell imaging that have allowed the analysis of mammalian RNA polymerase II transcription kinetics as The central dogma of molecular biology describes the they unfold in real-time. flow of information in the living cell from DNA to RNA to protein [1]. Information can also flow back from protein to nucleic acids. The fundamental process within this pathway that enables the mobility of genetic information 2. Lighting-up the nucleus from the stagnant DNA molecules contained within the cell nucleus to the ribosomal centers of protein Fluorescence microscopy provides the capability of translation and production in the cytoplasm is the following specific molecules as they are produced and process of messenger RNA (mRNA) transcription.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanism of Promoter Repression by Lac Repressor–DNA Loops Nicole A
    156–166 Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, Vol. 41, No. 1 Published online 9 November 2012 doi:10.1093/nar/gks1011 Mechanism of promoter repression by Lac repressor–DNA loops Nicole A. Becker1, Justin P. Peters1, Troy A. Lionberger2 and L. James Maher III1,* 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA and 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Jason L. Choy Laboratory of Single-Molecule Biophysics, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Received June 29, 2012; Revised October 1, 2012; Accepted October 2, 2012 ABSTRACT presence of allolactose or its analog, isopropyl b-D-1- thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), relieving repression. In the The Escherichia coli lactose (lac) operon encodes absence of glucose, RNA polymerase binds cooperatively the first genetic switch to be discovered, and lac with catabolite activator protein at the lac promoter (positive remains a paradigm for studying negative and control). In simplest terms, the mechanism of negative positive control of gene expression. Negative control involves Lac repressor binding to occlude access control is believed to involve competition of RNA of RNA polymerase holoenzyme to the lac promoter (4). polymerase and Lac repressor for overlapping Of particular significance to the present work is the binding sites. Contributions to the local Lac repres- fascinating observation that two remote auxiliary oper- sor concentration come from free repressor and re- ators (Oaux) exist in the lac operon (5). It has been pressor delivered to the operator from remote proposed and demonstrated (6–13) that bidentate repres- auxiliary operators by DNA looping.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicyclomycin Sensitivity and Resistance Affect Rho Factor-Mediated Transcription Termination in the Tna Operon of Escherichia Coli
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Aug. 1995, p. 4451–4456 Vol. 177, No. 15 0021-9193/95/$04.0010 Copyright 1995, American Society for Microbiology Bicyclomycin Sensitivity and Resistance Affect Rho Factor-Mediated Transcription Termination in the tna Operon of Escherichia coli CHARLES YANOFSKY* AND VIRGINIA HORN Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5020 Received 13 March 1995/Accepted 27 May 1995 The growth-inhibiting drug bicyclomycin, known to be an inhibitor of Rho factor activity in Escherichia coli, was shown to increase basal level expression of the tryptophanase (tna) operon and to allow growth of a tryptophan auxotroph on indole. The drug also relieved polarity in the trp operon and permitted growth of a trp double nonsense mutant on indole. Nine bicyclomycin-resistant mutants were isolated and partially characterized. Recombination data and genetic and biochemical complementation analyses suggest that five have mutations that affect rho, three have mutations that affect rpoB, and one has a mutation that affects a third locus, near rpoB. Individual mutants showed decreased, normal, or increased basal-level expression of the tna operon. All but one of the resistant mutants displayed greatly increased tna operon expression when grown in the presence of bicyclomycin. The tna operon of the wild-type drug-sensitive parent was also shown to be highly expressed during growth with noninhibitory concentrations of bicyclomycin. These findings demonstrate that resistance to this drug may be acquired by mutations at any one of three loci, two of which appear to be rho and rpoB. Zwiefka et al. (24) found that the antibiotic bicyclomycin segment and interacts with the transcribing RNA polymerase (bicozamycin), an inhibitor of the growth of several gram- molecule, causing it to terminate transcription (7, 9).
    [Show full text]
  • GENE REGULATION Differences Between Prokaryotes & Eukaryotes
    GENE REGULATION Differences between prokaryotes & eukaryotes Gene function Description of Prokaryotic Chromosome and E.coli Review Differences between Prokaryotic & Eukaryotic Chromosomes Four differences Eukaryotic Chromosomes Form Length in single human chromosome Length in single diploid cell Proteins beside histones Proportion of DNA that codes for protein in prokaryotes eukaryotes humans Regulation of Gene Expression in Prokaryotes Terms promoter structural gene operator operon regulator repressor corepressor inducer The lac operon - Background E.coli behavior presence of lactose and absence of lactose behavior of mutants outcome of mutants The Lac operon Regulates production of b-galactosidase http://www.sumanasinc.com/webcontent/animations/content/lacoperon.html The trp operon Regulates the production of the enzyme for tryptophan synthesis http://bcs.whfreeman.com/thelifewire/content/chp13/1302002.html General Summary During transcription, RNA remains briefly bound to the DNA template Structural genes coding for polypeptides with related functions often occur in sequence Two kinds of regulatory control positive & negative General Summary Regulatory efficiency is increased because mRNA is translated into protein immediately and broken down rapidly. 75 different operons comprising 260 structural genes in E.coli Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes some regulation occurs because as little as one % of DNA is expressed Gene Expression and Differentiation Characteristic proteins are produced at different stages of differentiation producing cells with their own characteristic structure and function. Therefore not all genes are expressed at the same time As differentiation proceeds, some genes are permanently “turned” off. Example - different types of hemoglobin are produced during development and in adults. DNA is expressed at a precise time and sequence in time.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes the Lac-Pathway Switch: Identifying the Fluctuations That Trigger Phenotype Switching in Gene Regulatory Systems
    What makes the lac-pathway switch: identifying the fluctuations that trigger phenotype switching in gene regulatory systems Prasanna M. Bhogale1y, Robin A. Sorg2y, Jan-Willem Veening2∗, Johannes Berg1∗ 1University of Cologne, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Z¨ulpicherStraße 77, 50937 K¨oln,Germany 2Molecular Genetics Group, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands y these authors contributed equally ∗ correspondence to [email protected] and [email protected]. Multistable gene regulatory systems sustain different levels of gene expression under identical external conditions. Such multistability is used to encode phenotypic states in processes including nutrient uptake and persistence in bacteria, fate selection in viral infection, cell cycle control, and development. Stochastic switching between different phenotypes can occur as the result of random fluctuations in molecular copy numbers of mRNA and proteins arising in transcription, translation, transport, and binding. However, which component of a pathway triggers such a transition is gen- erally not known. By linking single-cell experiments on the lactose-uptake pathway in E. coli to molecular simulations, we devise a general method to pinpoint the particular fluctuation driving phenotype switching and apply this method to the transition between the uninduced and induced states of the lac genes. We find that the transition to the induced state is not caused only by the single event of lac-repressor unbinding, but depends crucially on the time period over which the repressor remains unbound from the lac-operon. We confirm this notion in strains with a high expression level of the repressor (leading to shorter periods over which the lac-operon remains un- bound), which show a reduced switching rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Function of DNA Methylation in Plants
    REVIEWS Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants Huiming Zhang1,2*, Zhaobo Lang1,2 and Jian- Kang Zhu 1,2,3* Abstract | DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic modification that is important for gene regulation and genome stability. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation can lead to plant developmental abnormalities. A specific DNA methylation state is an outcome of dynamic regulation by de novo methylation, maintenance of methylation and active demethylation, which are catalysed by various enzymes that are targeted by distinct regulatory pathways. In this Review, we discuss DNA methylation in plants, including methylating and demethylating enzymes and regulatory factors, and the coordination of methylation and demethylation activities by a so- called methylstat mechanism; the functions of DNA methylation in regulating transposon silencing, gene expression and chromosome interactions; the roles of DNA methylation in plant development; and the involvement of DNA methylation in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. DNA methylation at the 5ʹ position of cytosine contrib- and regulatory factors are generally not lethal. However, utes to the epigenetic regulation of nuclear gene expres- DNA methylation appears to be more crucial for devel- sion and to genome stability1,2. Epigenetic changes, opment and environmental- stress responses in plants including DNA methylation, histone modifications and that have more complex genomes. Recent findings histone variants and some non- coding RNA (ncRNA) have uncovered important
    [Show full text]