Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater, and Related Habitats of the United States (Version 3)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater, and Related Habitats of the United States (Version 3) Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater, and Related Habitats of the United States (version 3) U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE - ECOLOGICAL SERVICES DIVISION OF BUDGET AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH OF GEOSPATIAL MAPPING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT FALLS CHURCH, VA 2204 REVISED JULY 2020 1 Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their support and contributions: Bill Kirchner, USFWS, Region 1, Portland, OR; Elaine Blok, USFWS, Region 8, Portland, OR Brian Huberty, USFWS, Region 3, Twin Cities, MN; Ralph Tiner, USFWS, Region 5, Hadley, MA: Kevin Bon, USFWS, Region 6, Denver, CO; Jerry Tande, USFWS, Region 7, Anchorage, AK; Julie Michaelson, USFWS, Region 7, Anchorage, AK; Norm Mangrum, USFWS, St. Petersburg, FL; Dennis Fowler, USFWS, St. Petersburg, FL; Jim Terry, USFWS, St. Petersburg, FL; Martin Kodis, USFWS, Chief - Branch of Resources and Mapping Support, Washington, D.C. and David J. Stout, USFWS, Chief - Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation, Washington, D.C. Peer review was provided by the following subject matter experts: Dr. Shawna Dark and Danielle Bram, California State University - Northridge. Robb Macleod, Ducks Unlimited, Great Lakes and Atlantic Regional Office, Ann Arbor, MI; Michael Kjellson, Dept. Wildlife and Fisheries, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD; and Deborah (Jane) Awl, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN. This document may be referenced as: Dahl, T.E., J. Dick, J. Swords, and B.O. Wilen. 2020. Data Collection Requirements and Procedures for Mapping Wetland, Deepwater and Related Habitats of the United States. Division of Habitat and Resource Conservation (version 3), National Wetlands Inventory, Madison, WI. 91 p. (Original document published 2009) This document can be found at http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Contributed-Data 2 PAGE NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Ecological Services Division of Budget and Technical Support Branch of Geospatial Mapping and Technical Support Falls Church, VA 2204 Revised June 2020 ................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Page No. .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 3 DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR MAPPING WETLAND, DEEPWATER AND RELATED HABITATS OF THE UNITED STATES ........................................... 5 Preface .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Standardized Classification and Terminology ...................................................................................... 7 2.1. Wetland Classification - Adaptations for Mapping Purposes ........................................................ 7 3. Data Collection Guidelines ................................................................................................................... 8 3.1. Basic Data Creation Guidelines: .................................................................................................... 8 3.2. Avoiding Extraneous Detail and Misrepresentation of Data ......................................................... 9 4. Technical Procedures for Data Collection and Image Analysis .......................................................... 10 4.1. Image Interpretation of Wetlands - General Concepts ................................................................. 10 4.2. Technical Methodologies:............................................................................................................ 11 4.3 Data Accuracy and Precision ........................................................................................................ 16 5. Non-compliant Map Data .................................................................................................................... 20 6. Limitations .......................................................................................................................................... 20 7. Universal Technical Processes ............................................................................................................ 22 7.1. Suitable Imagery .......................................................................................................................... 22 7.2. Ancillary Data as an Aid to Image Analysis ................................................................................ 22 7.3. Field Reconnaissance ................................................................................................................... 24 7.4. Aids to Field Determinations ....................................................................................................... 25 7.5. Field Forms and Reporting Requirements ................................................................................... 26 7.6. Private Land Access Protocol ...................................................................................................... 27 8. Achieving Quality Requirements for Wetland and Deepwater Data .................................................. 27 8.1 Review by Technical Specialist(s) ................................................................................................ 27 8.2 Scalable Products .......................................................................................................................... 28 3 8.3 Data Verification ........................................................................................................................... 29 8.4 Attribute Validity .......................................................................................................................... 29 8.5 Oversight, Data Integrity, and Database Management ................................................................. 29 9. References ........................................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix A: Wetland and Deepwater Classification for Mapping Purposes ......................................... 33 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Deepwater Habitats ............................................................................................................................. 34 Limits .................................................................................................................................................. 34 The Classification System ................................................................................................................... 35 Appendix B. Map Code Diagram ........................................................................................................... 64 Appendix C: Glossary of terms for Appendix A and B. ........................................................................ 66 Appendix D: Using the Verification Tools ............................................................................................ 72 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 72 Folder Contents ................................................................................................................................... 72 Dataset Compatibility ......................................................................................................................... 74 Running the models ............................................................................................................................ 74 Explanations of Verification Models .................................................................................................. 75 Appendix E – Supplemental Map information Template ....................................................................... 80 4 DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR MAPPING WETLAND, DEEPWATER AND RELATED HABITATS OF THE UNITED STATES Preface These technical procedures serve as a reference for conducting the image analysis work associated with mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats. This document is intended to be comprehensive, however situations may develop that require modifications or additions. It is impractical to include all of the technical aspects of data handling and analysis within this document or anticipate all resource inventory needs. Users are advised that other written conventions or formal training may be useful in recognizing and describing wetland habitats, image interpretation and/or mapping protocols. More detailed field guides, regional information, wetland plant lists and soils descriptions are available. This information is intended to provide general guidelines for work performance, but should not be substituted for direct communication with the appropriate Program, Project, or Technical Specialist(s) regarding procedural questions. For additional information
Recommended publications
  • Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils for Wetland Delineations In
    The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program 2870 Cranberry Highway East Wareham, MA 02538 Pocket Guide to Hydric Soils #508-291-3625 x 14 www.buzzardsbay.org for Wetland Delineations in Massachusetts Version 2.1 The Buzzards Bay National Estuary Program November, 2014 This document is a compilation of material taken from Delineating Bordering Vegetated Appendix G – Observing and Recording Hue, Value and Chroma Wetlands under the Wetlands Protection Act, published by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Wetlands, and Waterways and the Regional All colors noted in this Booklet refer to moist Munsell® colors (Gretag/Macbeth 2000). Do not attempt to determine colors while wearing sunglasses or tinted lenses. Colors must be determined Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and under natural light and not under artificial light. Northeast Region (Version 2.0), published by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Chroma Soil colors specified in the ACOE indicators do not have decimal points (except for indicator A12); This document also includes excerpts from the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the however, intermediate colors do occur between Munsell chips. Soil color should not be rounded to United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineation Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, qualify as meeting an indicator. For example, a soil matrix with a chroma between 2 and 3 should including the 2013 Errata, as well as Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New be recorded as having a chroma of 2+. This soil material does not have a chroma of 2 and would England, 3rd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States Natural Resources a Guide for Identifying and Delineating Conservation Service Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, 2010
    United States In cooperation with Department of the National Technical Agriculture Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States Natural Resources A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Conservation Service Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, 2010 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 7.0, 2010 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and C.V. Noble, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Copies of this publication can be obtained from: NRCS National Publications and Forms Distribution Center LANDCARE 1-888-LANDCARE (888-526-3227) [email protected] Information contained in this publication and additional information concerning hydric soils are maintained on the Web site at http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils
    United States Department of Field Indicators of Agriculture Natural Resources Hydric Soils in the Conservation Service United States In cooperation with A Guide for Identifying and Delineating the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils Version 8.2, 2018 (Including revisions to versions 8.0 and 8.1) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and J.F. Berkowitz, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • T E L L T a L E S a R a T O G a L a K E S a I L I N G C L U B
    What's Inside? T e l l t a l e S a r a t o g a L a k e S a i l i n g C l u b Web page: sailsaratoga.org May, 2016 Commodore’s Corner SLSC By Mark Welcome Annual Memorial Day It’s time to go sailing! Champagne Brunch The Club is in great shape and the docks are all in as of the Monday, May 30 April 30th work party. We had 120 memberships 10:00 AM - Noon represented at the first work party and were able to accomplish almost everything that was on our lists. Not to Adults $10 - Kids (12 and under) $5 worry, we have more than enough work to add to our lists th Champagne market price per bottle for Work Party #2 which will be on Saturday May 7 . Planned work details include getting the mooring field ready, Reservations no later than May 22 to more house cleaning, additional work on school boats and any number of projects on the grounds. We look forward to seeing many of you who couldn’t make the first work party at [email protected] the second work party so we can finish opening up the club Email reservations are preferred, and will be and start the sailing season off right. If you are unable to acknowledged! participate in the work parties, please contact John Smith, Melissa Tkal, Greg Tkal, JT Fahy, David Hudson or myself or call to see if they need help with additional projects. Given that Kathleen & Vic Roberts we are a volunteer run organization, there are always 399-4410 projects to do and we appreciate the help of all the members.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fox Meadow Drainage Improvement Project
    VILLAGE OF SCARSDALE WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK COMPREHENSIVE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SOUTH FOX MEADOW STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT In association with WESTCHESTER COUNTY FLOOD MITIGATION PROGRAM Rob DeGiorgio, P.E., CPESC, CPSWQ The Bronx River Watershed Fox Meadow Brook Bronx River Watershed Area in Westchester 48.3 square miles (30,932 acres) 15 Sub-watersheds Percent of undeveloped land in the Watershed 3.3% (0.8 acres in Fox Meadow Brook (FMB) FMB watershed) 928 acres (5.7% of watershed) Bronx River Watershed Fox Meadow Brook George Field Park High School Duck Pond Project Philosophy and Goals •Provide flood mitigation within the Fox Meadow Brook Drainage Basin. •Reduce peak run off rates in the Bronx River Watershed through dry detention storage. •Rehabilitate and preserve natural landscapes and wetlands through invasive species management and re- construction. •Improve water quality. • Petition for and obtain County grant funding to subsidize the project. Village of Scarsdale Fox Meadow Brook Watershed SR-2 BR-4 SR-3 BR-7 BR-8 SR-5 Village of Scarsdale History •In 2009 the Village completed a Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. •Critical Bronx River sub drainage basin areas identified inclusive of Fox Meadow Brook (BR-4, BR-7, BR-8). •26 Capital Improvement Projects were identified, several of which comprise the Fox Meadow Detention Improvement Project. •Project included in Village’s Capital Budget. •Project has been reviewed by the NYS DEC. •NYS EFC has approved financing for the project granting Scarsdale a 50% subsidy for their local share of the costs. Village of Scarsdale Site Locations – 7 Segments 7 Project Segments 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia USGS River Input Monitoring QA Project Plan
    QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN for the Virginia River Input Monitoring Program Prepared by Douglas L. Moyer U.S. Geological Survey 1730 E. Parham Road Richmond, VA 23228 for Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Chesapeake Bay Office PO Box 1105 Richmond, VA 23218 Effective August 2016 Approvals: Douglas Moyer, Project Manager, USGS Date Douglas Chambers, Acting Water-Quality Specialist, USGS Date Cindy Johnson, Project Officer, VDEQ Date Cindy Johnson, Quality Assurance Officer, VDEQ Date Peter Tango, Project Officer, US EPA Date Rich Batiuk, Quality Assurance Officer, US EPA Date QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN for the Virginia River Input Monitoring Program Prepared by: Douglas L. Moyer U.S. Geological Survey for Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Chesapeake Bay Office Richmond, VA updated August, 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 II. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY 18 III. QA OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA 21 IV. SAMPLING PROCEDURES 25 V. SAMPLE CUSTODY 26 VI. CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREQUENCY 27 VII. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 28 VIII. DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING 29 IX. INTERNAL QC CHECKS 30 X. PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS 31 XI. PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 31 XII. ASSESSMENT OF DATA VARIABILITY, BIAS, ACCURACY, REPRESENTATIVE- NESS, AND COMPLETENESS 32 XIII. CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR OUT-OF-CONTROL SITUATIONS 32 XIV. QA REPORTING PROCEDURES 33 3 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Background Quantification of the loads of nutrient and suspended solids into the Chesapeake Bay, and evaluation of the trends in constituent loads are necessary in order to determine the effects that these constituents have on the ecosystems of the Chesapeake Bay. The Virginia River Input Monitoring Program (formerly known as the Virginia Fall Line Nutrient Input Program) was developed to quantify and assess the effectiveness of programs aimed at reducing the impact of nutrient and suspended solid inputs.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER-QUALITY SWALES Maria Cahill, Derek C
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE Photo: Clean Water Services LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FACT SHEET WATER-QUALITY SWALES Maria Cahill, Derek C. Godwin, and Jenna H. Tilt most Oregon jurisdictions have moved away from grass. hink of a water-quality swale as a rain garden Design elements may vary in several aspects, including in motion: It treats runoff while simultaneously function, vegetation type, and physical setting. Tmoving it from one place to another. The terms “rain garden” and “swale” are often used Water-quality swales (WQ swales) are linear, vegetat- interchangeably, but rain gardens hold runoff and treat ed, channeled depressions in the landscape that convey it, while swales treat runoff as it is conveyed. Depending and treat runoff from a variety of surfaces. Runoff may on the design, the resulting water-quality benefits can be piped or channeled, or it may flow overland to a differ greatly, but water-quality swales generally provide swale. As water passes through the swale, some runoff lower benefit than rain gardens or stormwater planters. may infiltrate, or seep, into the soil. Not all swales are WQ swales. Conveyance swales, Maria Cahill, principal, Green Girl Land Development Solutions; such as ditches, move water from one place to another. Derek Godwin, watershed management faculty, professor, But these are likely narrow channels with no vegetation biological and ecological engineering, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University; Jenna H. Tilt, assistant and little to no water-quality benefits. WQ swales may be professor (senior research), College of Earth, Ocean, and planted either with grass or landscape plants, although Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University EM 9209 June 2018 Site conditions The channel and linear design of swales make them suitable for roadside runoff capture, although residen- tial areas with frequent, closely spaced driveway cul- verts may not be ideal locations (Barr 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Vegetation of the Carolinas: Classification and Description of Plant Communities of the Lumber (Little Pee Dee) and Waccamaw Rivers
    Natural vegetation of the Carolinas: Classification and Description of Plant Communities of the Lumber (Little Pee Dee) and Waccamaw Rivers A report prepared for the Ecosystem Enhancement Program, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources in partial fulfillments of contract D07042. By M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, Michael P. Schafale, and Michael Lee Carolina Vegetation Survey Curriculum in Ecology, CB#3275 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599‐3275 Version 1. May 19, 2009 1 INTRODUCTION The riverine and associated vegetation of the Waccamaw, Lumber, and Little Pee Rivers of North and South Carolina are ecologically significant and floristically unique components of the southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain. Stretching from northern Scotland County, NC to western Brunswick County, NC, the Lumber and northern Waccamaw Rivers influence a vast amount of landscape in the southeastern corner of NC. Not far south across the interstate border, the Lumber River meets the Little Pee Dee River, influencing a large portion of western Horry County and southern Marion County, SC before flowing into the Great Pee Dee River. The Waccamaw River, an oddity among Atlantic Coastal Plain rivers in that its significant flow direction is southwest rather that southeast, influences a significant portion of the eastern Horry and eastern Georgetown Counties, SC before draining into Winyah Bay along with the Great Pee Dee and several other SC blackwater rivers. The Waccamaw River originates from Lake Waccamaw in Columbus County, NC and flows ~225 km parallel to the ocean before abrubtly turning southeast in Georgetown County, SC and dumping into Winyah Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Membership Directory
    Established 1969 2018 2018 Membership Directory 2018 OFFICERS Commodore: Mark Walker Vice Commodore: Geoff Endris Treasurer: Tom Moore Welcome to Eagle Creek Sailing Club! We were established Secretary: Rich Fox in 1969 to "encourage, sponsor and develop recreational and competitive sailing on Eagle Creek Reservoir." Over the Past Commodore: Larry Conrad years, the club has built a wonderful facility and established many programs and events to achieve this. We have very COMMITTEE CHAIRS competitive club racing on Wednesday nights and friendly Sunday Fun-Day racing on Sunday afternoons. We have a Harbormaster: Dennis Robertson myriad of social events, including holiday pitch-ins, a Lobster Assistant: Jan Wishart Fest, and our year-end Final Bash. We have a well- Membership: Jane Schmidt established and very active youth sailing program that competes in regattas all season. They also hold two weeks of Assistant: Christy Merriman Summer Sailing Camp that has become more popular every Publicity: Rick Graef year (get your reservations in early). The club hosts four Racing: Bob Hickock regattas every year, and we encourage everybody to Assistant: John George participate in the Saturday evening regatta dinner and party whether you raced or not. Information on these events can be Safety / Education: Chuck Lessick found on our website at “ecsail.org.” Assistant: Wayne Myers The club belongs to the ILYA (Inland Lake Yachting Ship Store: Les Miller Association) and the YCA (Yachting Club of America). These Social: Vickie Greenough memberships give us privileges at other clubs that belong to those associations. More information can be found on their websites. Keep this in mind when traveling and use the CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS opportunity to visit other yachting and sailing clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Wetlands Inventory
    3/23/2016 Wetlands Mapper National Wetlands Inventory Ecological Services ES Home About Us Species Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Development and Energy FWS Regions Library Newsroom NWI Menu Wetlands Mapper NWI Home The Wetlands Mapper integrates digital map data with other resource information to produce timely and relevant management and decision support tools. We recommend looking at the following prior to launching a map: Wetlands Data » Please read the Disclaimer, Data Limitations, Exclusions and Precautions, and Status and Trends » the Wetlands Geodatabase User Caution. Wetlands Layer » Refer to the following links for documentation and answers to frequently asked New: Wetland Mapping questions: Other Topics » Projects Mapper! Wetlands Mapper Documentation and Instructions Manual (PDF) Frequently Asked Questions: Wetlands Mapper (PDF) Click below to open the Mapper. National Wetlands Frequently Asked Questions web page Printing maps with the Wetlands Inventory Mapper (PDF) Mapper Introduction Contact Information » VIDEO: How to find and use the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service's Wetlands Mapper Help and Contacts Click Here to Open the Wetlands Mapper* (data last modified on October 1, 2015; best viewed by maximizing your browser window) To beta test our new HTML5 (non­Flash) mapper on your desktop, click here (FAQs). Frequently Asked Please note: Questions When in the wetlands mapper, you can change major geographic regions by using the "Zoom to: select" pull down menu located at the upper right side corner. For help with the new mobile mapper location function, please read this FAQ. Adobe Flash™ is required to access the Wetlands Mapper. Please visit the Adobe Flash Player website (http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/) to download the latest version of the player.
    [Show full text]
  • Destin Harbor, Joe's Bayou, and Indian Bayou Water Quality
    FLORIDA RECIPIENT City of Destin, Florida Destin Harbor, Joe’s Bayou, and Indian AMOUNT $3,593,600 Bayou Water Quality Improvement LEVERAGE This project includes six projects in three focal areas included in the City of Destin’s $50,000 Master Stormwater Management plan to improve surface water quality in Destin LOCATION Harbor, Joe’s Bayou, and Indian Bayou that directly feed into the southwestern Okaloosa County, Florida portion of Choctawhatchee Bay. As part of the project, the City of Destin will establish roadside swale systems to provide treatment for shallow aquifer recharge ANNOUNCEMENT DATE November 2014 prior to discharge, construct exfiltration systems to provide stormwater treatment, and repair poorly performing culverts. Choctawhatchee Bay is a 27-mile-long estuary that PROGRESS UPDATE supports diverse aquatic and wetland habitats. No new or significant work to report. (April 2015) Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) habitat decline is a significant limiting factor for the overall productivity of the Choctawhatchee Bay, and efforts to improve water quality through the reduction of sediment input into the bay is anticipated to improve the viability of SAV in the western portions of the bay. Seagrass beds in Choctawhatchee Bay support diverse populations of fish and invertebrates, including many recreational and commercial species such as shrimp, eastern oysters, spotted seatrout, gulf menhaden, red drum, blue crab, gulf flounder and mullet. This work is complementary to additional stormwater treatment projects being supported through other oil spill settlement funds. The Gulf Environmental Benefit This suite of Fund, administered by the projects will National Fish and Wildlife complete the Foundation (NFWF), supports actions identified projects to remedy harm and in the City of eliminate or reduce the risk of Destin’s Master harm to Gulf Coast natural Stormwater resources affected by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Challenges in Distribution O-F.De High Voltage? RELAX!
    ISSN: 1863-5598 ZKZ 64717 01-14 Electronics in Motion and Conversion January 2014 Modern Challenges in Distribution o-f.de High voltage? RELAX! Medium voltage components for power electronics Does this sound familiar? Voltage increases, whenever it is least expected. Good for thrillers. Not so good for power electronic installations. That is why we developed our “ready-to-use switch components” based on IGBT and Thyristor technology, specifically for use in MV applications. They are even available with or without control or current loop feed power supply. So sit back, relax and look forward to an exciting conversation with your House of Competence. It's worth it. MV IGBT DC switches MV Thyristor AC switches engineered by MV IGBT / Thyristor control MV current loop feed power supply Welcome to the House of Competence. GvA Leistungselektronik GmbH | Boehringer Straße 10 - 12 | D-68307 Mannheim Phone +49 (0) 621/7 89 92-0 | www.gva-leistungselektronik.de | [email protected] CONTENT Read online and search for key subjects from all articles in Bodo’s Power Systems by going to Powerguru: Viewpoint . 4 Power Supply . 24 Progress in SiC and GaN - Good Things for the New Year Pin-Compatible Switcher Replacement for TO220-Style Linear Regulators Events . 4 By Matthias Ulmann, Texas Instruments News . 6-9 Automotive Power . 28-30 Blue Product of the Month . 10 5. eCarTec 2013 Munich: Connecting Mobility Markets Compact Converter Series COMPISO By Marisa Robles Consée, Corresponding Editor; Egston Bodo’s Power Systems Green Product of the Month . 12 Lighting . 32-33 Win a dsPICDEM™ MCLV-2 Development Board LED professional Symposium + Expo 2013; The Lighting Hub Microchip By Marisa Robles Consée, Corresponding Editor; Bodo’s Power Systems Guest Editorial .
    [Show full text]