1.1 – May 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1.1 – May 2015 Hart District Council Local Plan Site Assessment: Stage 2 – High Level Site Assessment – SHL259 – Land North of Cemetary, Heckfield Confidential Draft - 1.1 – May 2015 High Level Site Assessment Proforma Site Reference SHL259 Site Name Land North of Cemetery Parish Heckfield Site Address Land North of Cemetery, Heckfield Capacity Assessment and Categorisation Site Size (ha) 3.5ha Estimated Capacity 63 Comments on capacity The area was used to calculate the capacity using a dph figure of 18 (in accordance with gross-to-net ratio of 60%). Housing Strategy Category(s) 6 - Other (isolated site) Land Supply Category Category D: Sites not adjoining existing urban areas Key to Site Assessments: No overriding constraint to development of the site Constraint requiring further detailed assessment Major constraint undermining suitability of site Site Assessment Assessment Criteria Assessment comments Coloured assessment Accessibility to o Bus Stop – (Heckfield Place) 0.73km Employment and o Railway Station – (Hook) 7.98km services o Employment Centre – (Riseley Business Park) 2.83km o Public Open Space – (Riseley Recreation Ground) 2.34km o Health Facility – (Hook Surgery) 7.33km o Primary School – (Whitewater Primary School) 6.37km o Secondary School – (Yateley School) 10.55km o Supermarket – (Tesco, Hook) 7.98km Infrastructure • Schools: There is a projected (2018) surplus of primary years intake for both the Hook/Odiham (16%), and provision Yateley/Frogmore (8%) areas. There are planned expansions to four of the primary schools in the Hook area giving a total of 3.5FE between the schools, however there are no planned expansions in the Yateley area. • Health: There is believed to be some available capacity at local doctor surgeries and dentists in the area. There are no planned expansions of health facilities in the Hook area, but it is likely that any significant level of development in the centre of the district will require additional provision. • Retail: Hook is the closest town to service this site with convenience shops, the Hart Retail Infrastructure report shows that many of the supermarkets in the area are overtrading, and any further development will put Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd 1 Hart District Council Local Plan Site Assessment: Stage 2 – High Level Site Assessment – SHL259 – Land North of Cemetary, Heckfield Confidential Draft - 1.1 – May 2015 pressure on increasing retailer floorspace. It is unlikely that consumers would travel into any of the Hart areas for comparative shops as Reading is in close proximity to the site and offers a wider variety of shops and entertainment. • Transport (road): Due to the remote location of this site, there are few road schemes in the immediate vicinity of the site due for improvement; Traffic calming and a new 40MPH speed limit will be introduced to Bramshill. Additionally there will be traffic calming introduced along the A30 in Hartley Wintney. Junction improvements to the B3349 in Hook to improve visibility • Transport (other): The No. 72 bus service (Reading/Farnborough) provides a regular service six days a week runs through the Heckfield Parish (on the Odiham Road). • Green Infrastructure: The Hart Infrastructure Delivery Schedule highlights the need for open space, SANGs and allotments provisions in the areas north of Hook I order to reduce the pressure on the Hitches Lane SANG. There is a lack of provision in certain types of infrastructure in the area and development on the site will only increase the pressure on existing services. It is unlikely that the site is of sufficient size to provide the supporting infrastructure onsite. Current Use and This land is currently used for agriculture. There is no relevant planning history relating to this site. Relevant Planning History Nature Conservation Site is within the 5km Thames Basin Heaths SPA Zone of Influence. It is unlikely that a development on a site of this scale would be within the capacity of the Hitches Lane SANG to mitigate its potential impact on the TBH SPA. Therefore any development at the site would require either on-site SANGs provision or contributions for the provision of appropriate off-site SANGs. There are no nature conservation designations on the site. However, there is a large woodland north of the site which has an area-based TPO covering the wood. Minerals Resources The Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan Policies Map indicates that the whole site may be subject to minerals safeguarding for sharp sand and gravel (Policy 15 of the Hampshire minerals and waste plan). The extent to which this represents a constraint to development would need to be assessed. Landscape HCC Integrated LCA (2012) Landscape type: Woodland and plantation on heath Landscape character: Northeast Hampshire Plantations and Heath Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd 2 Hart District Council Local Plan Site Assessment: Stage 2 – High Level Site Assessment – SHL259 – Land North of Cemetary, Heckfield Confidential Draft - 1.1 – May 2015 Hart District LCA 1997: Landscape type: historic parkland and well-managed estate Landscape Character Area: Wellington Main features of the Wellington LCA: A well-wooded character, with extensive broadleaved and mixed woodlands and a patchwork of fields also within a woodland structure. There is a distinctively heathy character to the vegetation within the woods, hedges and roadside verges including pine, oak, birch, gorse, bracken and broom with former heathland and underlying acidic soils. Dispersed and sparse settlement patterns of individual farm buildings and houses occupy this subtle landform which gently falls to the east and west valleys of Whitewater and Lyde rivers. Summary Assessment: The site comprises the westernmost portion of a large open arable field between the B3349 and Laundry Lane. Whilst the field is screened effectively to the north by the woodland of Heckfield Heath, it is very open on in all other directions. Any development of the site would be highly visible at long distances, particularly to the south and east. The south of the site abuts onto a public right of way, which is entirely open to the site. Visual impacts would also be significant to the west where the existing dwellings on Church Lane overlook the site. Given the sites size, relative to existing development in this area, it would be expected that its development would cause significant harm to landscape character. Agricultural Land This site is on Grade 4 agricultural land. Heritage Assets There are no heritage assets on the site itself, however there are a number of designations surrounding the site. Heckfield Conservation Area is adjacent to the west of the site, including the locally listed parkland of Highfield House, which is also an area of significant archaeological. The site is within the setting of several Grade II Listed Buildings, including those on Church Lane (20 and 22 Church Lane and the East Block of the Village Hall) and Laundry Cottage to the southeast. Water resources and There are no Groundwater Source Protection Zones or licensed water abstraction points in close proximity to the quality site. Air Quality There are no believed to be any Air Quality Management Aras in close proximity to the site. On the basis of the evidence seen, none of the surrounding land uses would be likely to cause any air quality issues for the site. Flood risk This site is fully located within Flood Zone 1, and has a Limited risk of groundwater flooding. Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd 3 Hart District Council Local Plan Site Assessment: Stage 2 – High Level Site Assessment – SHL259 – Land North of Cemetary, Heckfield Confidential Draft - 1.1 – May 2015 Location and scale of This site is on greenfield land but is not located within a local or strategic gap. Heckfield is in close proximity to the development site, however it is outside of the settlement area, and does not adjoin to the boundary of Heckfield, although the west of the sit is in close proximity to it. The site is therefore isolated within the countryside and is not considered to be a sustainable location. The vast majority of the surrounding area is made up of fields, with patches of woodland, and Highfield Park west of the site. The handful of dwellings on Church Lane is also close to the west of the site. The site is very large in comparison to Heckfield, and there are few natural landscape features to screen views straight across the site. Therefore, any development on this site would be highly visible. Heckfield is a small historic rural hamlet with the Highfield House Parkland and St Michaelʼs Church at its centre. Any significant modern development within the area would be incongruous to the distinctive historic and rural character of the area. Un-neighbourly Uses There are no un-neighbourly land uses evident on or in close proximity to this site. Availability The site is believed to be available and this is supported by the fact that the site was submitted to HDC for Assessment inclusion in the SHLAA post November 2013. The landowner has indicated that the site would be available in the short term (0-5 years). Site Access There is potential for a vehicular access to be opened up on the western boundary of the site directly onto the B3349, subject to a detailed highways assessment. Access to this area for pedestrians and cyclists however is poor. There are no footways in the area and considerable upgrading on the pedestrian infrastructure in the area would be required if a significant development were to be taken forward. Summary of • Accessibility to all services and facilities is very poor, which will encourage car dependency; Constraints • Infrastructure deficiencies have been identified which would need to be addressed; • Site is isolated within the countryside and in an unsustainable location; • Development is likely to cause visual intrusion to existing properties to the west, to the public right of way to the south, and may harm the overall character of the landscape; • Site is adjacent to a variety of significant heritage assets and is within the setting of at least three Grade II Listed Buildings; • Significant development is likely to harm the rural character of Heckfield; • The entire site is subject to minerals safeguarding.
Recommended publications
  • Hart District Association of Parish & Town Councils
    HART DISTRICT ASSOCIATION OF PARISH & TOWN COUNCILS MINUTES OF THE MEETING Held on Tuesday 10th April 2018 At The Key Centre, Elvetham Heath PRESENT Alastair Clark Chairman Dogmersfield PC John Keane Vice Chairman Yateley TC Gill Chatfield Church Crookham PC David Argent Crondall PC Simon Ambler Crookham Village PC Geoff Beaven Dogmersfield PC Jan Hyatt Elvetham Heath PC Marilyn Robson Elvetham Heath PC Bob Schofield Fleet TC Daryl Phillips Hart DC David Bell Heckfield PC John Orchard Hook PC Bob Aylmer Mattingley PC Steve Burridge Rotherwick PC Harriet Kennett South Warnborough PC Meyrick Williams Winchfield PC Tony Spencer Yateley TC GUEST SPEAKER Chris Cornwell Transport in Hart 18/416 Welcome and Introductions Marilyn Robson welcomed all to the Key Centre, Elvetham Heath. 18/417 Apologies Apologies for absence were received from: Adrian Collett (Blackwater and Hawley TC) Chris Dorn (Crondall PC), Dan Bunter (Crookham Village PC), Liz Ford (Greywell PC, Long Sutton and Well PC), Dr Jane Worlock (Hook PC) and Andrew Renshaw (Winchfield PC). 18/418 Minutes of the Meeting held on 9th January 2018 The acceptance of the minutes was proposed by Tony Spencer and seconded by Geoff Beaven and all being in agreement; they were duly signed as an accurate record of the meeting. 18/419 Matters arising from Minutes of the Last Meeting There were no matters arising from the minutes of the last meeting. HDAPTC Minutes 2018-04-10 v04 Issued 350 18/420 Hart District Council Report - Daryl Phillips The Council have closed the accounts for the fiscal year that has just ended. Business continues but they are now operating under purdah due to the imminent local elections, with the expectation that business as usual will start again in June.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Capacity Study 2016
    Hart Landscape Capacity Study Main Study and Appendix 1 Hart District Council (2016) Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 8 3. Background to Study 9 4. Objectives 10 5. Approach and Methodology 11 6. Assessment Thresholds 21 7. Study Constraints 25 8. Map of the District: Summary of Results 26 Appendix 1: Local Area Summaries 27 Appendix 2: Local Area Record Sheets 157 Hart District Council Local Plan Landscape Capacity Study 2016 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose of the Study This report has been produced to inform the evidence base for the Hart District Council Local Plan. It assesses the relative capacity of the landscape to accommodate development in the rural areas of the District, outside of the established settlement boundaries. The capacity of each area has been awarded by testing the results of each assessment against the following criteria: Low capacity – the landscape area could not accommodate areas of new development without a significant and adverse impact on the landscape character. Occasional, very small scale development may be possible, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Low/medium capacity – a minimal amount of development could be accommodated only in limited situations, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Medium capacity – the landscape area could be able to accommodate areas of development in some parts, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Study 2016
    Hart Open Space Study Pepared by LUC October 2016 Project title: Hart open space study Client: Hart District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 5.0 14/10/16 Revised Final Report Matthew Matthew Philip Smith Parkhill Parkhill Hart Open Space Study 20151218 Last saved: 07/06/2016 16:20 Hart Open Space Study Prepared by LUC June 2016 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents 1 Introduction 1 Scope and objectives for the study and strategy 1 2 Approach to the study 2 Approach to the assessment of open space provision in Hart 2 3 Policy and strategic context 6 National planning policy context 6 Regional planning policy 6 Local planning policy context 9 4 Local Needs Assessment 12 Local Authority Profile 12 Key findings from open space consultation 15 5 Existing open space provision 34 Management and Ownership 35 Classification by Type 38 6 Developing a hierarchy 41 A. Parks and Gardens 42 B. Natural and Semi-natural Greenspace 44 C. Green Corridors 46 D. Amenity Greenspace 47 E. Allotments 48 F. Cemeteries and Churchyards 49 G. Provision for Children and Young People 50 H. Roadside Verges 52 I. Outdoor Sports Facilities 52 J. Civic Space 52 7 Setting future provision standards 53 Accessibility standard 53 Quantity standards for open space provision 58 Quality and value standards for open space provision 62 8 Applying the standards 66 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora News Newsletter of the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust’S Flora Group
    Autumn 2012 Published September 2012 Flora News Newsletter of the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust’s Flora Group Dear Flora Group member In this issue we have details of late-year events, including our ‘exhibition meeting’ on 8th December and advance notice of two interesting field survey meetings next year . Our usual roundup of past meeting reports follows . We also have some lavishly illustrated articles on a noteworthy orchid at Romsey, an interesting lawn at the HIWWT offices and more plant discoveries in Gosport . Neil Sanderson brings us up to date with his extraordinary Cladonia discoveries in the New Forest heathlands over the past year . Martin Rand has held back VC11 records for this issue, but instead has provided two articles updating progress on the BSBI Atlas 2020 and Threatened Plants projects . We are always keen for more people to provide contributions to Flora News on any relevant botanical topics . If you have enjoyed any of the Flora Group events and would like to write a report we would be very pleased to receive it . Please send your articles, notes or reports to Catherine Chatters (Flora Group Secretary) at CatherineC@hwt .org .uk or to her home address which is given at the end of this newsletter . Catherine Chatters Flora Group Secretary John Norton Editor In This Issue Forthcoming Events . 2 Reports of Recent Events . 3 News and Views Tale of a Green-winged Orchid . .Elizabeth Pratt . 8 Beechcroft Lawn – Some Botanical Surprises . .Clive Chatters . 9 Gosport Flora – Progress Report and Recent Discoveries . .John Norton . 10 Heathland Lichens in the New Forest .
    [Show full text]
  • Swallowfield and Its Owners
    wm mKlm m T Gc 942.2902 Sw971r 1269002 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRA 3 1833 00730 8387 Swallowfield and its Owners SWALLOWFIELD AND ITS OWNERS LADY RUSSELL WITH ILLUSTRATIONS LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY G* c I9GI PREFACE The following pages are the result of my having for many years past, during much desultory reading, dotted down everything I have come across that in any way related to Swallowfield or its owners. ' pretend to no style is simply an ' olla podrida \I ; my work from innumerable sources, good, bad, and indifferent. Some- times the most important events are merely sketched in, and at other times I enter into minute details, which would be gene- rally considered quite unimportant and uninteresting. But I have written this solely for my own family and neighbours at Swallowfield, and have therefore included everything that I thought might interest them. It is possible that I may occasionally have drawn from various authors without acknowledging my indebtedness, and of these I must ask pardon. Had I ever contemplated the publication of my notes, I should have been careful to give all my authorities ; as it is, I much regret that in some cases it is now impossible for me to do so. I had intended that this little work should be revised and vi Swallowfield and its Owners put into shape by one who took a great interest in it, and whose criticisms and suggestions I should have valued more than any- other, but fate has ordered it otherwise ; so I now send it forth in all its crudity, knowing that those for whom it is written will not be critical, and will excuse its shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of English Rural Life Page 1 of 286 FR Wellington/1000 Balance Sheet for the Stratfieldsaye Village Hall 1930 FR Wellingt
    Museum of English Rural Life FR Wellington/1000 Balance sheet for the Stratfieldsaye Village Hall 1930 FR Wellington/1001 Miscellaneous letters from tenants, farmers, business associates, etc., to G. F. North 1931 Concerning rents, repairs, estate matters, etc [From the Estate Agent's general file for that year, covering correspondents filed under S.] 27 docs FR Wellington/1002 Miscellaneous letters from tenants, farmers, business associates, etc., to G. F. North 1931 Concerning rents, repairs, estate matters, etc [From the Estate Agent's general file for that year, covering correspondents filed under T-V.] 32 docs FR Wellington/1003 Letters from Evelyn, Dowager Duchess of Wellington [widow of the 3rd Duke], Hartley Wintney, to G. F. North 1 March and 24 October 1931 Concerning necessary estate repairs 2 docs FR Wellington/1004 Miscellaneous letters from tenants, farmers, business associates, etc., to G. F. North 1931 Concerning rents, repairs, estate matters, etc [From the Estate Agent's general file for that year, covering correspondents filed under W.] 38 docs FR Wellington/1005 Miscellaneous letters from tenants, farmers, business associates, etc., to G. F. North 1932 Concerning rents, repairs, estate matters, etc Page 1 of 286 Museum of English Rural Life [From the Estate Agent's general file for that year, covering correspondents filed under M.] 29 docs FR Wellington/1006 Miscellaneous letters from tenants, farmers, business associates, etc., to G. F. North 1925 Concerning rents, repairs, estate matters, etc [From the Estate Agent's general file for that year, covering correspondents filed under E-F.] 41 docs FR Wellington/1007 Letters/receipts from Barclays Bank Ltd., Reading, to G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reading Naturalist
    The Reading Naturalist No. 46 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 1994 Price to Non-Members £2.50 THE READING NATURALIST No 46 for the year 1993 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr Michael Fletcher Honorary General Secretary Mrs Meryl Beek Honorary Editor Mr Kenneth Grinstead. Editorial Sub-Committee The Editor, Mr Brian R. Baker, Or Alan Brickstock, Mr Hugh Carter, Mr Michael V. Fletcher, Miss June Housden, Mrs Betty M. Newman Honorary Recorders Botany: Mrs Betty M. Newman Fungi: Or Alan Brickstock Entomology: Mr Brian R. Baker Other Invertebrates and Vertebrates: Mr Hugh H. Carter CONTENTS Excursions 1992 - 1993 Renee Grayer 1 Meetings 1992 - 1993 Meryl Beek 3 Membership 3 Obituaries: Lt. Col. G. G. Eastwick-Field 4 K. M. Horswell Presidential Address, October 14 1993: "Some observations on Large Swimming Animals" Michael Fletcher 5 "A Fungus Horror Story" Christine Oswald 14 Recorder's Report for Botany Betty M. Newman 15 Recorder's Report for Fungi Alan Brickstock 22 Recorder's Report for Entomology Brian R. Baker 28 Recorder's Report for Vertebrates Hugh H. Carter 38 Recorder's Report for Other Invertebrates Hugh H. Carter 40 The Weather at Reading during 1993 Russel D. Thompson 41 EDITORIAL Having volunteered to become Editor I must first acknowledge the help given by the former Editor, Frances Cook, in introducing me to the ways and means of producing "The Reading Naturalist". The task has been made much easier with the help given by Alan Brickstock, so much so that I feel he should be given the title of Co-Editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in Hampshire
    Archaeology in Hampshire Annual Report 2013 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Annual Report of Archaeology in Hampshire for 2013. Up until 2003 Hampshire County Council published an Annual Report of Archaeology in Hampshire. The first volume was published in 1977 (for the year 1976) and for over a quarter of a century it proved to be a valuable resource bringing together in summary fashion archaeological work carried out in a particular year, whether it was by professional organization, academic institution or local society. The report ensured that knowledge of such work was easily and conveniently available to all interested parties. The final report of this ‘first series’ was published in 2004 (for 2003). Following a hiatus of several years, The Hampshire Field Club (HFC) was invited to produce a new series of reports and began with a round-up of the ‘missing’ years. These can be downloaded from the Hampshire Field Club website. From 2008 the report has been published annually and copies are available for download from the HFC website. Developments in technology have forced a re-think about the most efficient way to go about the publication of interim statements and it was decided that an electronic format (i.e. a PDF document) provided a convenient and cost-effective solution. It also offers the option of printing only what is required. The structure and content of the report The report is organized by District and then alphabetically by location. Individual entries consist of a location that includes a grid reference. This is followed by an identifier, usually a Site UID, which links it to a record held in The Archaeology and Historic Buildings Record (AHBR) database for Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Strategy the Loddon Catchment
    Biodiversity Strategy The Loddon catchment Biodiversity Strategy: The Loddon catchment 2003 Protecting Wildlife for the Future Cover photograph: Foxlease and Ancells Meadow SSSI Acknowledgements Courtesy of Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust This strategy has been produced by the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust with funding from Dormouse by Phil McLean the Environment Agency. Support and advice was Adder by Phil McLean provided by the Loddon catchment Biodiversity Silver Studded Blue by David Purslow Strategy Steering Group, comprising the following Lapwing by Dennis Garratt organisations: ! Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust ! Environment Agency ! Wokingham Unitary Authority ! Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust ! Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership ! Surrey Wildlife Trust Data for the strategy was provided by: ! Hampshire County Council ! Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre ! Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust ! Environment Agency ! Surrey Wildlife Trust ! Wokingham Unitary Authority ! Blackwater Valley Countryside Partnership ! Hampshire Ornithological Society ! Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust This data has been analysed for the purposes of this project but remains the copyright of the data providers. Maps within the strategy have been produced by Naomi Ewald and remain the copyright of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust and the Environment Agency. Written by: Naomi Ewald, Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Published by: Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust, Beechcroft House, Vicarage Lane, Curdridge, Hampshire, SO32 2DP. Company limited by guarantee and registered in England, no. 676313. Registered charity no. 201081. Maps have been reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives Index
    Commons, Greens and Allotments Archives Index DEFRA, HLRO and The National Archives February 2007 Contents Introductory Note Introductory Note .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Website Details .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Main Index Contents of Main Index ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 County Listings ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 General References Royal
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    Contents References Page 1 Introduction Background to the study 1 Approach and methodology 3 Structure of the report 5 2 Formative Influences Introduction 6 Physical influences 6 Human influences 12 3 Landscape Character Assessment Introduction and rationale 19 Landscape Types 19 Landscape Character Areas 25 4 Landscape Evaluation Purpose 27 Approach to evaluation 28 Conclusions 29 5 The Landscape Character Areas Introduction 33 Wellington 34 Tilney 38 Bartley 42 Whitewater Valley 45 Blackwater Valley 49 Firgrove 53 Bramshill 57 Hazeley/West Green 61 Winchfield 65 Dogmersfield 69 Hart Valley 73 Minley 77 Tweseldown 81 Redlands 85 Hart Downs 89 Page Tables Table 1: Relationship between County and District landscape types 21 Figures Figure 1: Study Area 2 Figure 2: Simplified Geology 8 Figure 3: Topography and Drainage 11 Figure 4: Landscape Types 22 Figure 5: Landscape Character Areas 26 Figure 6: Landscape evaluation 30 1 Introduction Background to the study 1.1 The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive and definitive appraisal of the landscape resources of the Hart District which is intended to inform countryside planning and management decisions and priorities within the District. The impetus for its preparation has come from two main directions. 1.2 Firstly, there is a growing recognition generally of the role of landscape assessment as a basis for planning and management of environmental resources, given greater emphasis through the publication of new guidance on landscape assessment by the Countryside Commission in 1993 [1]. The Commission encourages local planning authorities to undertake landscape assessments as part of the Government’s policy on sustainable development and sees their general purpose as providing informed background for policy and development control decisions and countryside management priorities and initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Structure Record the Cellars of Heckfield Place, Bramshill Road Heckfield, Hook, Hampshire
    Historic Structure Record The Cellars of Heckfield Archaeological Services Ltd Place, Bramshill Road Heckfield, Hook, Hampshire December 2010 by Martin Wilson for Operis Construction Ltd Historic Structure Record The Cellars of Heckfield Place, Bramshill Road, Heckfield, Hook, Hampshire RG27 0LD Planning Application Reference No. 10/01861/MAJOR by Martin Wilson BA Hons MIfA MIEnvSc Souterrain Project No. SOU10/144 December 2010 for Operis Construction Ltd (cover map: reproduced from the 1871 Ordnance Survey map of Hampshire: 1:2,500 © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence number AL 100015565) © Souterrain Archaeological Services Ltd, 2010 Registered Office: 50 Rectory Drive, Exhall, Coventry, Warwickshire CV7 9PD Registered in England and Wales No. 03394485 e-mail: [email protected] www.souterrain.biz Affiliated to the Council for British Archaeology (CBA) Historic Structure Record: The Cellars of Heckfield Place, Heckfield, Hampshire, App. Ref. 01861/MAJOR CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 3 PREFACE 4 1. SCOPE OF THE REPORT 5 2. INTRODUCTION 5 3. SITE LOCATION 5 4. HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE 5 5. METHODOLOGY 6 6. OBSERVATIONS 6 7. COPYRIGHT AND CONFIDENTIALITY 7 Souterrain Archaeological Services Ltd 2 December 2010 Historic Structure Record: The Cellars of Heckfield Place, Heckfield, Hampshire, App. Ref. 01861/MAJOR List of Figures Figure 1 Location of site. Figure 2 Extract: 1819 Heckfield Place Estate Map Figure 3 Extract: 1840 Tithe Map Figure 4 Extract: 1871 Ordnance Survey, 1:2,500 scale map Figure 5 Location of cellars and phase plan Figure 6 Photograph Viewpoints (Figs. 7 to 22) Figure 7 Viewpoint 1. The west end of the mansion house showing the remains of the westernmost cells (C and E) Figure 8 Viewpoint 2.
    [Show full text]