DOCSLIB.ORG

Change from Rift to Retroarc Foreland Basin in Southwestern New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Change from Rift to Retroarc Foreland Basin in Southwestern New Mexico Mid-Cretaceous (late Albian) change from rift to retroarc foreland basin in southwestern New Mexico GREG H. MACK Department of Earth Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 ABSTRACT Cretaceous (Aptian-Turonian) sedimentary rocks in southwest- ern New Mexico were deposited in two stages that were controlled primarily by tectonism. During the first stage, from Aptian through middle Albian time, a maximum of 1,900 m of siliciclastic and carbon- ate sediment accumulated in a west-northwest-trending rift basin. Lithic and arkosic sediment was derived initially from intrabasin up- lifts and subsequently from a west-northwest-trending, basement- cored rift shoulder that marked the northern boundary of the basin. Decreases in subsidence and siliciclastic sedimentation rate in mid- Albian time were a response to wearing down of the rift shoulder and marked tbe end of the first stage of sedimentation. Beginning in late Albian time, what is now southwestern New Mexico experienced increases in tectonic subsidence and siliciclastic sedimentation rate. As much as 1,500 m of quartzarenite and shale was deposited in the southwestern part of the study area, and -300 m of upper Albian, Cenomanian, and Turanian sediment onlapped the former rift shoulder. Paleocurrent and facies data indicate that sedi- ment dispersal was eastward, southeastward, and northeastward. The second stage of sedimentation took place in a retroarc foreland basin that was complementary to a compressional orogenic belt in what is now southeastern Nevada, southeastern California, western Arizona, and/or Sonora, Mexico. INTRODUCTION Cretaceous tectonism in the southwestern United States and north- western Mexico was the result of eastward subduction of the Farallon plate beneath North America (Dickinson, 1981). In response to subduc- tion, a magmatic arc formed in what is now western Nevada, western Arizona, California, Baja California, and Sonora, Mexico (Fig. 1; Gastil, 1975; Silver and others, 1975; Coney, 1978; Rangin, 1978; Dickinson, Figure 1. Paleotectonic maps illustrating two different tectonic models for mid-Cretaceous time. a. The Chihuahua trough is a rift basin that is separated from the retroarc foreland basin by a rift shoulder and lowlands. Adapted from McGookey and others (1972), Dickinson (1981), Bilodeau and Lindberg (1983), and Mack and oth- ers (1986). b. A retroarc foreland basin extends across Utah, Colo- rado, Arizona, and New Mexico and is complementary to the Sevier thrust belt and/or an orogenic belt in southeastern California, western Arizona, and Sonora, Mexico. Adapted from McGookey and others (1972), Dickinson (1981), Molenaar (1983), and Mack and others (1986). The solid line extending from southwestern New Mexico to southeastern Utah is the position of the late Cenomanian shoreline, inferred by Molenaar (1983). Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 98, p. 507-514, 5 figs., 1 table, May 1987. 507 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/98/5/507/3445177/i0016-7606-98-5-507.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 508 G. H. MACK Figure 2. Index map of the locations of measured sections (solid circles) of Cretaceous rocks. Contour lines are isopachs in metres. The line labeled "rift sho ulder" separates thick (>500 m) from thin Cretaceous rocks and is the northern limit of Aptian through middle Albian rocks. 1981). The Sevier thrust belt developed east of the magmatic arc and can Dickinson and others (1986a) suggested that the trough resulted from be traced southward with some degree of confidence to the vicinity of Las either back-arc rifting or was a fa iled arm of the Gulf of Mexico rift. In this Vegas, Nevada (Fig. 1; Armstrong, 1968; Dickinson, 1981). South of Las extensional model, the northern, limit of the basin is a west-northwest- Vegas, in southeiistern California, western Arizona, and Sonora, Mexico, trending rift shoulder that acted not only as a sediment source but also as a the tectonic histoid is less well constrained, but scattered evidence indicates barrier separating the Chihuahua trough from the relroarc foreland basin middle and Late Cretaceous compressional deformation (Hamilton, 1982; to the north (Fig. la; Dickinson, 1981; Bilodeau and Lindberg, 1983). The Burchfiel and Davis, 1971, 1972, 1975, 1977; Drewes, 1978; Rangin, rift shoulder is not clearly defined in southwestern New Mexico but may 1978; Reynolds and others, 1980). A retroarc foreland basin, which correspond to a line that separates thick (>500 ni) from thin Lower formed east of ths Sevier thrust belt, subsided in response to thrust loading Cretaceous rocks (Fig. 2). and received detiital sediment from the thrust belt (Fig. 1; McGookey and The rift model for the Chihuahua trough is not universally accepted, others, 1972; Dickinson, 1976, 1981; Jordan, 1981). however. Drewes and Hayes (1983) challenged the field interpretations of During Early Cretaceous time in southeastern Arizona, southwestern Bilodeau (1982) upon which the rift model is based. Alternatively, Hayes New Mexico, west Texas, and northern Mexico, a maximum of 3.2 km of (1970) proposed that Lower Cretaceous detrital sedimentary rocks in siliciclastic and carbonate sedimentary rocks accumulated along the southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico were derived pri- northwestern edge of the Chihuahua trough (Fig. la; Kottlowski, 1965; marily from a source to the west or southwest of the basin. Similar disper- Zeller, 1965; Hayes, 1970; Greenwood and others, 1977; Bilodeau and sal models have been proposed for Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks in Lindberg, 1983; Mack and others, 1986). Two different tectonic models northern and central New Mexico (Sabins, 1964; Fassett and Hinds, 1971; have been proposed for the origin of the Chihuahua trough. Bilodeau Molenaar, 1973,1983; Cumella, 1983). A westerly sediment source raises (1978, 1982), Dickinson (1981), Bilodeau and Lindberg (1983), and the possibility that the Chihuahua trough was a retroarc foreland basin that Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/98/5/507/3445177/i0016-7606-98-5-507.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 MID-CRETACEOUS RETROARC FORELAND BASIN, NEW MEXICO 509 was complementary to a compressional orogenic belt that may have ex- A variety of stratigraphic names have been applied to interbedded tended south and southeast of the Sevier thrust belt (Fig. lb). sandstone and shale of the upper siliciclastic interval (Fig. 3). In the Big The purpose of this paper is to present evidence to suggest that Hatchet, Little Hatchet, and Animas Mountains, the Mojado Formation is Cretaceous sedimentation in southwestern New Mexico occurred in two ~ 1,500 m thick and is late Albian to earliest Cenomanian in age (Zeller, different stages that reflect different tectonic settings. The sedimentology 1965, 1970; Zeller and Alper, 1965). Rocks in the Peloncillo Mountains and petrology of Aptian through middle Albian rocks are consistent with that are lithologically equivalent to the Mojado Formation were mapped the rift model of Bilodeau (1978, 1982), Dickinson (1981), Bilodeau and as the Still Ridge and Johnny Bull Formations by Gillerman (1958) and as Lindberg (1983), and Dickinson and others (1986a). In late Albian time, the Cintura Formation by Drewes and Thorman (1980a, 1980b). A late however, southwestern New Mexico experienced dramatic increases in Albian to early Cenomanian age has also been established for the Sarten tectonic subsidence and siliciclastic sedimentation rate, as well as changes Formation in the Cooke's Range (Clemons, 1982; W. A. Cobban, 1986, in sediment dispersal and provenance. These changes mark the beginning personal commun.), and upper Albian and Cenomanian rocks are also of a retroarc foreland basin that persisted into the Late Cretaceous present at Cerro de Cristo Rey, New Mexico and Mexico (Figs. 2, 3; (Fig. lb). Lovejoy, 1976). The Beartooth Quartzite, exposed near Silver City and in the Burro Mountains, does not have index fossils but is assumed to be late STRATIGRAPHY Albian and/or early Cenomanian in age because of its similarity to the Sarten Formation and its conformable position beneath the Colorado In southwestern New Mexico, Cretaceous sedimentary rocks can be Formation (Figs. 2, 3; Mack and others, 1986). The Colorado Formation divided into lower and upper siliciclastic intervals and a middle carbonate- ranges in age from middle to late Cenomanian to middle Turonian (Mole- rich interval (Fig. 3). The lower siliciclastic interval consists of a basal naar, 1983; W. A. Cobban, 1986, personal commun.) and consists of a conglomerate (=s42 m thick) that is overlain by a maximum of 700 m of lower shale member and an upper sandstone member (Hewitt, 1959; conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and shale (Mack and others, 1986). Jones and others, 1967). Molenaar (1983) recommended abandonment of Throughout most of the region, the lower siliciclastic interval is called the the name Colorado Formation in favor of the names Mancos, Atarque, Hell-to-Finish Formation (Fig. 3; Zeller, 1965, 1970; Zeller and Alper, and Moreno Hill Formations, which are used in central New Mexico. The 1965), but in the Peloncillo Mountains, the names McGhee Peak (Giller- top of the Colorado Formation is an erosional unconformity. man, 1958) or Glance and Morita Formations (Drewes and Thorman, 1980a, 1980b) were applied. The middle carbonate-rich interval is repre- EVIDENCE OF TWO STAGES OF SEDIMENTATION sented by the U-Bar Formation and the Carbonate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Catalog of the Sedimentary Basins of the United States
    Preliminary Catalog of the Sedimentary Basins of the United States By James L. Coleman, Jr., and Steven M. Cahan Open-File Report 2012–1111 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Coleman, J.L., Jr., and Cahan, S.M., 2012, Preliminary catalog of the sedimentary basins of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1111, 27 p. (plus 4 figures and 1 table available as separate files) Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1111/. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonics and Sedimentation in Foreland Basins: Results from the Integrated Basin Studies Project
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 30, 2021 Tectonics and sedimentation in foreland basins: results from the Integrated Basin Studies project ALAIN MASCLE 1 & CAI PUIGDEFABREGAS 2,3 IIFP School, 228-232 avenue Napoldon Bonaparte, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, France (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen, Norway. 3Institut de Ciences de la Terra, (?SIC, Barcelona, Spain. Why foreland basins? to a better understanding of some basic interact- ing tectonic, sedimentary and hydrologic pro- Over the last ten years or so, since the Fribourg cesses (More & Vrolijk 1992; Touret & van meeting in 1985 (Homewood et al. 1986), the Hinte 1992). Additional data have also been attention given by sedimentologists and struc- obtained through the development of analogue tural geologists to the geology of foreland basins and numerical models (Larroque et al. 1992; has been growing continuously, parallel to the Zoetemeijer 1993). The physical parameters increase of co-operative links between scientists controlling the forward propagation of d6colle- from the two disciplines. A number of reasons ments and thrusts (fluid pressure, roughness, lie behind this development. Attempting to sediment thickness, etc.) have been determined understand the growth of an orogen without and tested. The relationships between rapidly paying due attention to the stratigraphic record subsiding piggyback basins and growing ramp of the derived sediments would be unrealistic. It anticlines have also been imaged, although the would, moreover, be equally unrealistic to con- lack of deep-sea well control still prevents accu- struct restored sections across the chain without rate sedimentological studies. More significant considering the constraints imposed by the has been the progress in our understanding of basin-fill architecture, or to describe the basin- the role of fluids and pore pressure in the fill evolution disregarding the development of development of thrust belts.
    [Show full text]
  • From Orogeny to Rifting: When and How Does Rifting Begin? Insights from the Norwegian ‘Reactivation Phase’
    EGU21-469 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-469 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. From orogeny to rifting: when and how does rifting begin? Insights from the Norwegian ‘reactivation phase’. Gwenn Peron-Pinvidic1,2, Per Terje Osmundsen2, Loic Fourel1, and Susanne Buiter3 1NGU - Geological Survey of Norway, 7040 Trondheim, Norway 2NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway 3Tectonics and Geodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, 52064 Aachen, Germany Following the Wilson Cycle theory, most rifts and rifted margins around the world developed on former orogenic suture zones (Wilson, 1966). This implies that the pre-rift lithospheric configuration is heterogeneous in most cases. However, for convenience and lack of robust information, most models envisage the onset of rifting based on a homogeneously layered lithosphere (e.g. Lavier and Manatschal, 2006). In the last decade this has seen a change, thanks to the increased academic access to high-resolution, deeply imaging seismic datasets, and numerous studies have focused on the impact of inheritance on the architecture of rifts and rifted margins. The pre-rift tectonic history has often been shown as strongly influencing the subsequent rift phases (e.g. the North Sea case - Phillips et al., 2016). In the case of rifts developing on former orogens, one important question relates to the distinction between extensional structures formed during the orogenic collapse and the ones related to the proper onset of rifting. The collapse deformation is generally associated with polarity reversal along orogenic thrusts, ductile to brittle deformation and important crustal thinning with exhumation of deeply buried rocks (Andersen et al., 1994; Fossen, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Rocky Mountain Foreland Basin: Combined Structural
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2007 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORELAND BASIN: COMBINED STRUCTURAL, MINERALOGICAL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIN EVOLUTION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN THRUST FRONT, NORTHWEST MONTANA Emily Geraghty Ward The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ward, Emily Geraghty, "DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORELAND BASIN: COMBINED STRUCTURAL, MINERALOGICAL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIN EVOLUTION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN THRUST FRONT, NORTHWEST MONTANA" (2007). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1234. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1234 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORELAND BASIN: COMBINED STRUCTURAL, MINERALOGICAL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIN EVOLUTION ROCKY MOUNTAIN THRUST FRONT, NORTHWEST MONTANA By Emily M. Geraghty Ward B.A., Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA, 1999 M.S., Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 2002 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2007 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School James W. Sears, Chair Department of Geosciences Julia A. Baldwin Department of Geosciences Marc S. Hendrix Department of Geosciences Steven D.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Thermal, Mechanical and Tectonic Evolution of the Rio Grande Rift
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 91, NO. B6, PAGES 6263-6276, MAY 10, 1986 Cenozoic Thermal, Mechanical and Tectonic Evolution of the Rio Grande Rift PAUL MORGAN1 Departmentof Geosciences,Purdue University,West Lafayette, Indiana WILLIAM R. SEAGER Departmentof Earth Sciences,New Mexico State University,Las Cruces MATTHEW P. GOLOMBEK Jet PropulsionLaboratory, CaliforniaInstitute of Technology,Pasadena Careful documentationof the Cenozoicgeologic history of the Rio Grande rift in New Mexico reveals a complexsequence of events.At least two phasesof extensionhave been identified.An early phase of extensionbegan in the mid-Oligocene(about 30 Ma) and may have continuedto the early Miocene (about 18 Ma). This phaseof extensionwas characterizedby local high-strainextension events (locally, 50-100%,regionally, 30-50%), low-anglefaulting, and the developmentof broad, relativelyshallow basins, all indicatingan approximatelyNE-SW •-25ø extensiondirection, consistent with the regionalstress field at that time.Extension events were not synchronousduring early phase extension and were often temporally and spatiallyassociated with major magmatism.A late phaseof extensionoccurred primarily in the late Miocene(10-5 Ma) with minor extensioncontinuing to the present.It was characterizedby apparently synchronous,high-angle faulting givinglarge verticalstrains with relativelyminor lateral strain (5-20%) whichproduced the moderuRio Granderift morphology.Extension direction was approximatelyE-W, consistentwith the contemporaryregional stress field. Late phasegraben or half-grabenbasins cut and often obscureearly phasebroad basins.Early phase extensionalstyle and basin formation indicate a ductilelithosphere, and this extensionoccurred during the climax of Paleogenemagmatic activity in this zone.Late phaseextensional style indicates a more brittle lithosphere,and this extensionfollowed a middle Miocenelull in volcanism.Regional uplift of about1 km appearsto haveaccompanied late phase extension, andrelatively minor volcanism has continued to thepresent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Rift Valley the Great Rift Valley Stretches from the Floor of the Valley Becomes the Bottom Southwest Asia Through Africa
    --------t---------------Date _____ Class _____ Africa South of the Sahara Environmental Case Study The Great Rift Valley The Great Rift Valley stretches from the floor of the valley becomes the bottom Southwest Asia through Africa. The valley of a new sea. is a long, narrow trench: 4,000 miles (6,400 The Great Rift Valley is the most km) long but only 30-40 miles (48-64 km) extensive rift on the Earth's surface. For wide. It begins in Southwest Asia, where 30 million years, enormous plates under­ it is occupied by the Jordan River and neath Africa have been pulling apart. the Dead Sea. It widens to form the basin Large earthquakes have rumbled across of the Red Sea. In Africa, it splits into an the land, causing huge chunks of the eastern and western branch. The Eastern Earth's crust to collapse. Rift extends all the way to the shores of Year after year, the crack that is the the Indian Ocean in Mozambique. Great Rift Valley widens a bit. The change is small and slow-just a few centimeters A Crack in the Ea rth Most valleys are carved by rivers, but the Great Rift Valley per year. Scientists believe that eventually is different. Violent forces in the Earth the continent will rip open at the Indian caused this valley. The rift is actually Ocean. Seawater will pour into the rift, an enormous crack in the Earth's crust. flooding it all the way north to the Red Along the crack, Africa is slowly but surely splitting in two.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithospheric Folding and Sedimentary Basin Evolution: a Review and Analysis of Formation Mechanisms Sierd Cloething, Evgenii Burov
    Lithospheric folding and sedimentary basin evolution: a review and analysis of formation mechanisms Sierd Cloething, Evgenii Burov To cite this version: Sierd Cloething, Evgenii Burov. Lithospheric folding and sedimentary basin evolution: a review and analysis of formation mechanisms. Basin Research, Wiley, 2011, 23 (3), pp.257-290. 10.1111/j.1365- 2117.2010.00490.x. hal-00640964 HAL Id: hal-00640964 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00640964 Submitted on 24 Nov 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Basin Research For Review Only Page 1 of 91 Basin Research 1 2 3 4 1 Lithospheric folding and sedimentary basin evolution: 5 6 2 a review and analysis of formation mechanisms 7 8 9 3 10 11 4 12 13 5 14 a,* b 15 6 Sierd Cloetingh and Evgenii Burov 16 7 17 18 8 aNetherlands ResearchFor Centre forReview Integrated Solid EarthOnly Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life 19 20 9 Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 21 10 22 23 11 bUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire de Tectonique, 4 Place Jussieu, 24 25 12 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Deep-Tow Observations at the East Pacific Rise, 8°45N, and Some Interpretations
    4. DEEP-TOW OBSERVATIONS AT THE EAST PACIFIC RISE, 8°45N, AND SOME INTERPRETATIONS Peter Lonsdale and F. N. Spiess, University of California, San Diego, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California ABSTRACT A near-bottom survey of a 24-km length of the East Pacific Rise (EPR) crest near the Leg 54 drill sites has established that the axial ridge is a 12- to 15-km-wide lava plateau, bounded by steep 300-meter-high slopes that in places are large outward-facing fault scarps. The plateau is bisected asymmetrically by a 1- to 2-km-wide crestal rift zone, with summit grabens, pillow walls, and axial peaks, which is the locus of dike injection and fissure eruption. About 900 sets of bottom photos of this rift zone and adjacent parts of the plateau show that the upper oceanic crust is composed of several dif- ferent types of pillow and sheet lava. Sheet lava is more abundant at this rise crest than on slow-spreading ridges or on some other fast- spreading rises. Beyond 2 km from the axis, most of the plateau has a patchy veneer of sediment, and its surface is increasingly broken by extensional faults and fissures. At the plateau's margins, secondary volcanism builds subcircular peaks and partly buries the fault scarps formed on the plateau and at its boundaries. Another deep-tow survey of a patch of young abyssal hills 20 to 30 km east of the spreading axis mapped a highly lineated terrain of inactive horsts and grabens. They were created by extension on inward- and outward- facing normal faults, in a zone 12 to 20 km from the axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Rift-Valley-1.Pdf
    R E S O U R C E L I B R A R Y E N C Y C L O P E D I C E N T RY Rift Valley A rift valley is a lowland region that forms where Earth’s tectonic plates move apart, or rift. G R A D E S 6 - 12+ S U B J E C T S Earth Science, Geology, Geography, Physical Geography C O N T E N T S 9 Images For the complete encyclopedic entry with media resources, visit: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/rift-valley/ A rift valley is a lowland region that forms where Earth’s tectonic plates move apart, or rift. Rift valleys are found both on land and at the bottom of the ocean, where they are created by the process of seafloor spreading. Rift valleys differ from river valleys and glacial valleys in that they are created by tectonic activity and not the process of erosion. Tectonic plates are huge, rocky slabs of Earth's lithosphere—its crust and upper mantle. Tectonic plates are constantly in motion—shifting against each other in fault zones, falling beneath one another in a process called subduction, crashing against one another at convergent plate boundaries, and tearing apart from each other at divergent plate boundaries. Many rift valleys are part of “triple junctions,” a type of divergent boundary where three tectonic plates meet at about 120° angles. Two arms of the triple junction can split to form an entire ocean. The third, “failed rift” or aulacogen, may become a rift valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Analysis.Pdf
    Basin Analysis Introduction Basin Analysis Mechanisms of Basin Formation Basin Classification Basins and Sequence Stratigraphy Summary Introduction Introduction Basin analysis - Study of sedimentary rocks What is a basin? to determine: Repository for sediment Subsidence history Formed by crustal subsidence relative to Stratigraphic architecture surrounding areas Paleogeographic evolution Surrounding areas sometimes uplifted Tools: Many different shapes, sizes and Geology (outcrops, wireline logs, core) mechanisms of formation Geophysics (seismic, gravity, aeromag) Computers (modeling, data analysis) Introduction Introduction Zonation of the Earth – Composition Zonation of the Upper Earth – Crust Rheology Mantle Lithosphere Core Rigid outer shell Crust and upper mantle Asthenosphere Weaker than lithosphere Flows (plastic deformation) 1 Introduction Introduction Zonation of the Upper Earth – Plate motions Rheology Plate-plate interactions can generate Vertical motions (subsidence, uplift) in vertical crustal movements sedimentary basins are primarily in We will examine basins according to their response to deformation of lithosphere positions with respect to plate and asthenosphere boundaries and plate-plate interactions “Wilson Cycle” – opening and closing of ocean basins Mechanisms of Basin Introduction Formation Three types of plate boundaries: Major mechanisms for regional Divergent – plates moving apart subsidence/uplift: Mid-ocean ridges, rifts Isostatic – changes in crustal or Convergent –
    [Show full text]
  • Fault Geometry and Kinematics Within the Terror Rift, Antarctica THESIS
    Fault Geometry and Kinematics within the Terror Rift, Antarctica THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By William B. Blocher Graduate Program in Earth Sciences The Ohio State University 2017 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Terry Wilson, Advisor Dr. Thomas Darrah Dr. Derek Sawyer Copyrighted by William B. Blocher 2017 Abstract The Terror Rift is the youngest expression of the intraplate West Antarctic Rift System that divides the Antarctic continent. Previous studies of the Terror Rift have ascribed a variety of interpretations to its structure, and especially to the regional anticline known as the Lee Arch, which has been explained as a transtensional flower structure, a rollover anticline, and as the result of magmatic inflation. Fault mapping and the documentation of stratal dips in this study have revealed a Terror Rift structure characterized by north-south folds and a complex distribution of faults. Nearly all faults have normal sense dip separation. A continuous zone of west-dipping faults with relatively high-magnitude normal separation are interpreted to be the border fault system defining the eastern margin of Terror Rift. Reconstruction of listric ramp-flat geometry of this border fault system explains intrarift fold and fault patterns well. Zonation of structures indicates that the listric rift detachment faults are segmented along the rift axis. This new model for rift structure indicates orthogonal rift extension in the ENE- WSW direction, with low strains of <10% calculated from bed-length balancing. i Acknowledgments To my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Stages of Development in the Polish Carpathian Foredeep Basin
    Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. • 4(1) • 2012 • 138-162 DOI: 10.2478/s13533-011-0044-0 Central European Journal of Geosciences Stages of development in the Polish Carpathian Foredeep Basin Review article Nestor Oszczypko1∗∗, Marta Oszczypko – Clowes1† 1 Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, 30-063 Kraków, Poland Received 27 September 2011; accepted 16 November 2011 Abstract: In southern Poland, Miocene deposits have been recognised both in the Outer Carpathians and the Carpathian Foredeep (PCF). In the Outer Carpathians, the Early Miocene deposits represent the youngest part of the flysch sequence, while in the Polish Carpathian Foredeep they are developed on the basement platform. The inner foredeep (beneath the Carpathians) is composed of Early to Middle Miocene deposits, while the outer foredeep is filled up with the Middle Miocene (Badenian and Sarmatian) strata, up to 3,000 m thick. The Early Miocene strata are mainly terrestrial in origin, whereas the Badenian and Sarmatian strata are marine. The Carpathian Foredeep developed as a peripheral foreland basin related to the moving Carpathian front. The main episodes of intensive subsidence in the PCF correspond to the period of progressive emplacement of the Western Carpathians onto the foreland plate. The important driving force of tectonic subsidence was the emplacement of the nappe load related to subduction roll-back. During that time the loading effect of the thickening of the Carpathian accretionary wedge on the foreland plate increased and was followed by progressive acceleration of total subsidence. The mean rate of the Carpathian overthrusting, and north to north-east migration of the axes of depocentres reached 12 mm/yr at that time.
    [Show full text]