DOCSLIB.ORG

September/October 2001 $3.00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 The Keystone State's Official Fishing and Boating Magazine September/October 2001 $3.00 ' Jid m WL Fall Trout Fishing page 34 •SINK, www.fish.state.pa.us 'J •? r4 -*? ^^Sf^ Deep Water Bass page 12 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 IS FISH-FORFREE DAY- TAKE A FRIEND FISHING. A Matter of Opinions Anglers and boaters care. They care about constant stocking, and provides oppor­ the proposed changes to the Delayed- their sport, and they care about the re­ tunity to extend the "no-kill" experience Harvest program, the idea of allowing source. They care about the Fish & Boat to more anglers. The "no-kill" period fishing with artificial lures on Delayed- Commission and its programs, and they extends from September until mid-June Harvest waters currently limited to fly care about proposed changes to fishing of the following year. From mid-June fishing only attracted a lot of comment. and boating regulations. Anglers and through Labor Day, the limited-harvest Using today's modern communication boaters have a wide variety of opinions. component allows anglers to take three techniques, including the Internet and Anglers and boaters don't hesitate to let trout per day. These trout would other­ e-mail, fly-fishers sent in many messages us know what they think, and they of­ wise be lost to natural mortality as a result opposing any change to the Delayed- ten communicate their views in no of stress induced by elevated water tem­ Harvest regulations. At the same time, uncertain terms. peratures and reduced flows. supporters of "traditional angling" have Let's look at a couple of examples that Delayed-Harvest management is a contacted the Commission to indicate the Commission, the Boating Advisory deliberate attempt to extend the use of their opposition to any special tackle re­ Board and the staff are currently review­ stocked trout and to permit more types strictions on trout waters. They want the ing. The Commission received a petition of anglers to experience no-kill angling. Delayed-Harvest waters open to all tackle to change special boating regulations on "Recycling" of trout is a key component and oppose even the artificial-lures-only Beltzville Lake in Carbon County. The of the Delayed-Harvest concept. There­ restrictions. petitioners, avid water skiers, want the fore, to minimize hooking mortality, an In the face of these diverse opinions, current regulations modified to open the Artificial-Lures-Only tackle restriction the Commission decided to seek public entire lake to water skiing and expand was created. comment on proposed changes to the the times when water skiing is allowed. The Delayed-Harvest program began Delayed-Harvest program. In a similar At a public meeting held at Beltzville State in 1983 with one water, a 1.25-mile sec­ move, the Commission decided to seek Park, the comments were about evenly tion of Cool Spring Creek, Mercer County. public comment on a suggestion to re­ divided between supporters and oppo­ In the past 15 years or so, Delayed Har­ duce the daily creel limit on panfish from nents of the proposed changes. For every vest has continued to grow. Today, there 50 per day to 25 per day, effective in 2003. water skier who wanted the current regu­ are 26 Delayed-Harvest, Fly-Fishing-Only In seeking public comment on both these lations changed, there was an angler or (DHFFO) waters, and 51 Delayed-Harvest, proposals, the Commissioners were not other boater who thought his or her rec­ Artificial-Lures-Only (DHALO) projects. endorsing them. reation would be hurt by more water The Commission is currently seeking It's important for anglers and boaters skiing. After due consideration of the public comment on a concept to merge to understand the importance of their widely split opinions on this issue, the the two different tackle restrictions ap­ input in this process. The Commissioners Commission decided to issue a notice of plicable to Delayed Harvest into a single (and the staff) read all public comments proposed rulemaking (and start a for­ DHALO program. This would provide and give them full and fair consideration. mal public comment process) on a for simpler regulations and more diverse A public comment period is a chance for proposal to keep the water-ski zone as trout fishing opportunities at a time of anglers and boaters to share their reason­ is, while expanding the hours when water reduced trout stocking. The proposal has ing as well as their conclusions. skiing is allowed. attracted a good deal of opposition from The members of the Fish & Boat Com­ Boating regulation proposals are not fly fishers who want to maintain the mission cannot promise you that their the only ones that attract wide divergences DHFFO restrictions. decisions on regulations and policies will in public opinion. Proposed changes to The proposed change to Delayed-Har­ always agree with your opinions. But they our Delayed-Harvest trout fishing pro­ vest regulations does not affect the can promise you that they will review and gram have also attracted a lot of inter­ Heritage Trout Angling program, which consider all viewpoints and make the very est. Delayed-Harvest management is one was created specifically to reflect the best decision they can in the best inter­ of the most popular and widely used spe­ tradition fly angling has played in Penn­ ests of the Commonwealth, fishing, cial-regulations programs the Commis­ sylvania trout angling and conservation. boating and the resource. sion offers. The eight waters under the Heritage Trout The underlying principle in Delayed Angling regulations offer no-kill trout Harvest centers on the use of trout- fishing opportunities for fly-fishers only. stocked stream sections to offer a high Even before the Commission approved Peter A. Colangelo catch-rate fishery that places less empha­ publication of a notice of proposed Executive Director sis on harvest, creates less need for rulemaking to seek public comment on Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission -&i PROTECT • CONSERVE • ENHANCE >MBF j Commission Update Nominations Sought for Commission Curtails Trout Abele Conservation Heritage Award Production at Big Spring The Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission is seeking nominations for the 2001 Fish Culture Station Ralph W. Abele Conservation Heritage Award. The Ralph W. Abele Conservation The Fish & Boat Commission recently Heritage Award is the highest recognition the Commission can confer on persons proposed to undertake an orderly dispo- who distinguish themselves in the cause of conservation. The Commission estab­ sition of the remaining adult and lished the Abele Award to recognize citizens of Pennsylvania who have made outstanding fingerling trout held at Big Spring Fish contributions to the protection, conservation and enhancement of the Commonwealth's Culture Station. Trout production will aquatic resources. The award serves as a memorial to Ralph Abele, longtime Com­ not resume there until installation of a mission executive director, for his steadfast and courageous work in protecting and major upgrade including recirculation conserving our natural resources. technology, subject to review and approval The Abele Award is presented to a Penn- by the Department of Environmental Pro­ sylvanian who has dedicated his or her time tection (DEP). and energy to the conservation of the state's According to Commission fisheries natural resources, specifically the aquatic managers, it may take until mid-Novem­ resources, through one or more of the fol­ ber to stock all the remaining trout from lowing accomplishments: Big Spring Fish Culture Station. Some • Personally invested heavily in the long- of the 30,000 remaining adult trout may term education of Pennsylvania's youth on be moved to other fish culture stations, conservation issues vital to an improved with the others to be stocked early this aquatic environment. fall. More than 700,000 fingerlings will • Put at risk his or her person and live­ be stocked in appropriate waters or moved lihood to undertake public activities and to other facilities as soon as weather and positions on behalf of improving and pro- water conditions permit. tecting the aquatic resources of "We believe the interim operations plan Pennsylvania. we submitted to DEP was a good one. At • Led a regional or statewide environ­ the same time, our goal at Big Spring must mental effort that has been recognized for focus on the longer term and protection its duration and success in protecting and of the resource. We want to upgrade the enhancing the aquatic resources of Penn­ hatchery and install recirculation tech- sylvania. nology. We need to attract the • Played a leading role in reclaiming and Commonwealth funding needed to ac­ enhancing a major significant natural water complish this major, expensive upgrade," resource in the Commonwealth. said Fish & Boat Commission Executive • Led an effort to pass major environmental legislation for the protection, con­ Director Peter A. Colangelo. servation and enhancement of Pennsylvania's natural environment. • Brought national recognition to Pennsylvania through personal activities, ac­ tions and contributions to the aquatic resources. Launch Permits Employees and active Commissioners of the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commis­ sion are not eligible for this award, but they are encouraged to submit nominations. Permits issued by the Department Nominations may be sent to Dennis Guise, Deputy Executive Director/Chief Counsel, of Conservation and Natural Re- Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission, P.O. Box 67000, Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000. sources (DCNR) allowing Nominations should be postmarked no later than September 10,2001. The nomi­ non-powered boats to launch at state nations should describe, in a maximum of three typewritten pages, the following: park lakes are now valid for use at • Biographical information. access areas and lakes operated by • How the nominee meets the categories for recognition. the Fish & Boat Commission. The • Specific accomplishments of the nominee.
Recommended publications
  • Connections Spring 2008

    Connections Spring 2008

    Spring Focus of Proposed 2009-2012 TIP 2008 is Bridge Repair/Replacement The proposed 2009-2012 most of the listed projects are Park-n-Ride: 4 projects - Transportation Improvement geared toward system preser- Butler Twp., intersection of Program (TIP) has been de- vation, maintenance, and im- I-80 and PA 309; veloped by the Lackawanna/ provement. These projects in- Luzerne MPO. clude intersection improve- White Haven Borough - loca- ments, existing signal improve- tion undetermined; The TIP comprises the first ments, and road resurfacings. four years of the 12-year pro- Nuangola Borough - SR gram and the Long Range Some of the other projects on 2042 at Exit 159 of I-81; Transportation Plan. It is a the proposed TIP include the listing of projects and line following: Sugarloaf Twp. - Tomhicken items for which funding has Road, near Exit 145 of I-81 Widening: 2 projects - been designated. The proposed TIP is slated to !-81 between the Central Line items are designated be adopted by the MPO at Scranton Expressway and funding sources that can be the July meetings, pending Davis Street Interchanges; used for a particular category the results of the public com- ment period. It will then be project, such as rail, highway Airport Beltway, Hazle Town- reviewed and adopted at the reserve, transportation en- ship hancement, etc., when state and federal levels after needed. New Roadway: 2 projects - which it will become effec- South Valley Parkway which tive as of October 1st. In addition to the line item will provide better access to The public version of the categories, there are specific the Luzerne County Commu- 2009 TIP can be accessed at project listings.
  • Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017

    Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017

    TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts.
  • America's Rails-With-Trails

    America's Rails-With-Trails

    America’s Rails-with-Trails A Resource for Planners, Agencies and Advocates on Trails Along Active Railroad Corridors About Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) has helped develop more than 21,000 miles of rail-trail throughout the country and provide technical assistance for thousands of miles of potential rail-trails waiting to be built. Serving as the national voice for more than 100,000 members and supporters, RTC has supported the tremendous growth and development of rail-trails since opening our doors on February 1, 1986, and remains dedicated to the creation of a nationwide network of trails and connecting corridors. RTC is committed to enhancing the health of America’s environment, transportation, economy, neighborhoods and people — ensuring a better future made possible by trails and the connections they inspire. Orange Heritage Trail, N.Y. (Boyd Loving) Acknowledgements The team wishes to recognize and thank RTC staff who contributed to the accuracy and utility of this report: Barbara Richey, graphic designer, Jake Lynch, editor, and Tim September 2013 Rosner, GIS specialist. Report produced by Rails-to-Trails The team is also grateful for the support of other RTC staff and interns who assisted Conservancy with research and report production: LEAD AUTHORS: Priscilla Bocskor, Jim Brown, Jesse Cohn, Erin Finucane, Eileen Miller, Sophia Kuo Kelly Pack, Director of Trail Development Tiong, Juliana Villabona, and Mike Vos Pat Tomes, Program Manager, RTC extends its gratitude to the trail managers and experts who shared their Northeast Regional Office knowledge to strengthen this report. A complete list of interview and survey participants is included in the Appendix, which is available online at www.
  • Switchback Book.Indd

    Switchback Book.Indd

    Switchback Grav ity Railroad Historic Landscape Preservation Planning Study Graduate Program in Historic Preservation School of Design University of Pennsylvania Acknowledgements This study was conducted at the request, and with the support, of the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, for which Dale Freudenberger served as project manager. The project partners and University of Pennsylvania team would like to thank all those who contributed to the research and analysis and those who provided advice and input. Study Team: Preservation Studio 2007, Graduate Program in Historic Preservation, School of Design, University of Pennsylvania Alex Bevk, Jenna Cellini, Caroline Cheong, Nicole Collum, Mark Donofrio, Sean Fagan, Marco Federico, Kimberly Forman, Anita Franchetti, Catherine Keller, Maureen McDougall, Sara McLaughlin, Suzanne Segur, Imogen Wirth-Granlund, Emily Wolf, Randall Mason (Associate Professor), Ashley J. Hahn (Teaching Assistant), Erica C. Avrami (Critic) Partners: Dale Freudenberger, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Joseph DiBello, National Park Service; Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (RTCA) John Drury, Switchback Gravity Railroad Foundation Contributors and Advisors: Citizens from the towns of Jim Thorpe and Summit Hill Mauch Chunk Historical Society Toni Artuso, Carbon County Office of Economic Development Summit Hill Historical Society Phyllis Bolton, Carbon County Planning Office & Redevelopment Authority Dennis DeMara, PA DCNR Michael Heery, Carbon County Chamber of Commerce Dan Hugos, Jim
  • America's Rails-With-Trails

    America's Rails-With-Trails

    America’s Rails-with-Trails A Resource for Planners, Agencies and Advocates on Trails Along Active Railroad Corridors About Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) has helped develop more than 21,000 miles of rail-trail throughout the country and provide technical assistance for thousands of miles of potential rail-trails waiting to be built. Serving as the national voice for more than 100,000 members and supporters, RTC has supported the tremendous growth and development of rail-trails since opening our doors on February 1, 1986, and remains dedicated to the creation of a nationwide network of trails and connecting corridors. RTC is committed to enhancing the health of America’s environment, transportation, economy, neighborhoods and people – ensuring a better future made possible by trails and the connections they inspire. Orange Heritage Trail, N.Y. (Boyd Loving) Acknowledgements The team wishes to recognize and thank RTC staff who contributed to the accuracy and utility of this report: Barbara Richey, graphic designer, Jake Lynch, editor, and Tim September 2013 Rosner, GIS specialist. Report produced by Rails-to-Trails The team is also grateful for the support of other RTC staff and interns who assisted Conservancy (RTC): with research and report production: Kelly Pack Priscilla Bocskor, Jim Brown, Jesse Cohn, Erin Finucane, Eileen Miller, Sophia Kuo Pat Tomes Tiong, Juliana Villabona, and Mike Vos Barry Bergman RTC extends its gratitude to the trail managers and experts who shared their Patrick Donaldson knowledge to strengthen this report. A complete list of interview and survey Eli Griffen participants is included in the Appendix, which is available online at www.
  • Living Here in Allentown

    Living Here in Allentown

    LIVING HERE IN ALLENTOWN BEYOND THE RED DOORS Red Door Publications Allentown, PA Copyright © 2005 by Red Door Publications. All rights reserved. Red Door Publications is a recognized student organization at Muhlenberg College, in Allentown PA. Photos as credited Send correspondence to: Red Door Publications Muhlenberg College 2400 Chew Street Allentown, PA 18102 Printed in the United States of America ABOUT THIS BOOK When in Allentown, do as Allentonians do. Need some help? We’ve assembled a fool-proof guide to get you started. Written by college students for college students, Living Here in Allen- town picks up at the edge of campus—the world beyond the Red Doors. We show you around your new hometown, from its greasy spoons to its drive-in theatres. The book was born out of frustration. Most Muhlenberg students confine themselves to campus. The brave make it as far as the strip malls off Cedar Crest Boulevard, but few of us ever leave the West End. Downtown Allentown, in particular, hardly regis- ters in the Muhlenberg mind. The guide is meant to change all this—to burst the infamous “Muhlenberg Bubble.” The book took shape in a fall 2004 Muhlenberg College course, “Print Production.” You could say that this guide—Living Here in Allentown—is the 21 students’ final project. Editors, researchers, graphic designers, food critics, publicists, ad salespeople—we were all of these over the course of a semester. We liked it enough that we’ve formed a group, Red Door Publications, to update the book and to work on new projects. We wandered the city—tasted the soup at the Shanty, rode the Dorney Park roller-coasters—so that you, too, would venture be- yond the Red Doors.
  • Laurel Highlands

    Laurel Highlands

    # Rail-Trail Name # Rail-Trail Name # Rail-Trail Name 11 ALLEGHENY HIGHLANDS TRAIL (GAP) 88 GHOST TOWN TRAIL 1155 ROTARY WALK TRAIL TT HH EE LL AA UU RR EE LL HH II GG HH LL AA NN DD CC LL II 22 ALLEGHENY PORTAGE RAILROAD TRAIL 99 GREENE RIVER TRAIL 1166 SEWICKLEY CREEK TRAIL TTEE NN TTAATT IIVV EE DD EELL II NNEE AATTII OONN OO FF SS UU BB LL AA NN DD SSCC AA PP EE SS 3 10 17 3 ARROWHEAD TRAIL 10 INDIAN CREEK VALLEY TRAIL 17 SHEEPSKIN TRAIL Allegheny 44 BROWNS RUN TRAIL 1111 JAMES MAYER RIVERWALK 1188 STEEL VALLEY TRAIL (GAP) 55 COAL & COKE TRAIL 1122 MONTOUR TRAIL 1199 THREE RIVERS HERITAGE TRAIL (GAP) Lower Burrell The Laurel Highland CLI 66 1133 2200 ELIZA FURNACE TRAIL PATH OF THE FLOOD TRAIL WESTMORELAND HERITAGE TRAIL Location Map 7 1144 21 7 FIVE STAR TRAIL PW&S BIKE TRAIL 21 YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER TRAIL NORTH (GAP) Erie Warren Susquehanna Upper Burrell McKean Tioga Bradford Potter Crawford Wayne Forest Wyoming Cameron Sullivan Lackawanna Venango Elk Pike Lycoming Washington Mercer Clinton Jefferson Bell Clarion Luzerne Monroe Lawrence Columbia Clearfield Mont our Union Butler Centre Carbon Armstrong Snyder Northumberland Northampton Beaver Schuylkill Indiana Lehigh Mifflin Juniata Loyalhanna Allegheny Blair Cambria Perry Dauphin Berks Bucks Lebanon Municipality of Murr Westmoreland Huntingdon Montgomery 6 Washington 20 Cumberland Lancaster Philadelphia Bedford Chester Fayette Somerset 22 Fulton Franklin York Delaware Greene Adams 19 Salem LAUREL RIDGE SP 8 d n la Derry e r Penn KEYSTONE SP o m t St. Clair s STATE e PARK 13 18 Manor

  • Pennsylvania's Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Table of Contents

    Pennsylvania’sPennsylvania’s RecreationRecreation PlanPlan 2004-20082004-2008 Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Edward G. Rendell, Governor Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Michael DiBerardinis, Secretary Richard D. Sprenkle Deputy Secretary for Conservation and Engineering Services Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Larry G. Williamson, Director April 2004 i The Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Would like to thank the citizens of Pennsylvania, federal, state and local agencies and private and non-profit organizations for their assistance in the development of Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Interagency Recreation Planning and Greenways Advisory Committee Pennsylvania Department of Aging Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Sandra Robison, Director Bureau of Farmland Preservation Rob Davidson Bureau of Farmland Preservation Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development Neil R. Kinsey, Local Government Policy Specialist Center for Local Government Services Courtney Carlson Tourism Marketing Pennsylvania Department of Education Patricia Vathis, Environmental Education Advisor Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Julia Anastasio, Director Policy Office Pennsylvania Fish And Boat Commission Tom Ford, Resources Planning Coordinator Pennsylvania Game Commission Thomas Wylie Executive Office Pennsylvania Department of Health Leslie Best, Director Bureau of Chronic Disease and Injury
  • House Transportation Committee Public Hearing on House

    House Transportation Committee Public Hearing on House

    House Transportation Committee Public Hearing on House Transportation Task Force Bill Package On Behalf of the Keystone Transportation Funding Coalition Ross Willard, Recycle Bicycle August 18, 2020 Good morning Chairman Hennessey, Chairman Carroll and distinguished members of the House Transportation Committee. My name is Ross Willard. I serve as President and Chief Mechanical Officer of Recycle Bicycle. Recycle Bicycle is a Harrisburg-based non-profit organization where community volunteers teach bicycle safety and maintenance, and receive unwanted or abandoned bicycles. These bikes are repaired or rebuilt and returned - free of charge - to the community for those who need them either for transportation or recreation. This morning I am here as a member of the panel representing the Keystone Transportation Funding Coalition (KTFC) to share the mobility and transportation perspective from that of bicyclists and pedestrians. While we will not address the individual Bills that compose the Task Force Bill Package it is important to note that we strongly support legislation that will increase or redirect funding available to support and improve transportation options and infrastructure for all Pennsylvanians, including bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and investments in public transportation. We also support legislation that improves efficiencies and timeliness of transportation projects through such strategies as design-build and bundling programs. Bicycle advocacy organizations across our state believe our roadways require a major investment and commitment to improving bicycling infrastructure to bring catch up to the infrastructure provided in many other states. As one who rides a bicycle as a primary means of transportation it should be noted that I also own and drive a car and use public transportation, as do most cyclists I know.
  • Jim Thorpe Trail Connection Master Site Development Plan (Draft)

    Jim Thorpe Trail Connection Master Site Development Plan (Draft)

    Jim Thorpe Trail Connection Master Site Development Plan Prepared for: Jim Thorpe Carbon County, PA Draft - December 2016 CHAPTER 2 This project was partially funded by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program Environmental Stewardship Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), Bureau of Recreation and Conservation (Bureau) administered through the Pennsylvania Environmental Council’s Pocono Forests & Waters Conservation Landscape (PFW CL) Mini Grant Program. Project Committee: Eloise Ahner Dennis DeMara Kristie Fach Tom Gerhard Kathy Henderson Wayne Nothstein William O’Gurek Ryan Richards Christopher Strohler Benjamin Walbert Carbon County Contact: David Bodnar, Director Office of Planning and Development SC# 16062.10 Project Consultants: Simone Collins Landscape Architecture Planners and Landscape Architects Hanover Engineering Associates Engineers and Consultants William Collins, RLA 2 Jim Thorpe Trail Connection Master Site Development Plan CHAPTER 2 INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS Table of Contents 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1 Purpose for Study 2 Plan Goals 2 Public Participation 3 Data Collection and Methodology 5 Chapter 2 - Inventory and Analysis 5 General Site Description 6 Use 10 Regional Context 11 History 12 On-Site Reconnaissance 13 Planning Documents 15 Circulation 17 Geology and Soils 19 Hydrology 21 Assets and Constraints 25 Suggested Improvement Options 25 Anticipated Level of Uses 26 Trail Design Standards 28 Trail Surface Types 30 Suggested Trail
  • Heartland Pathways and Kickapoo Rail Trail Lead Illinois Prairie SAVING Preservation AMERICA’S Efforts PRAIRIES

    Heartland Pathways and Kickapoo Rail Trail Lead Illinois Prairie SAVING Preservation AMERICA’S Efforts PRAIRIES

    to Winter.16 Inspiring Movement Heartland Pathways and Kickapoo Rail Trail Lead Illinois Prairie SAVING Preservation AMERICA’S Efforts PRAIRIES Connecting the Wild West 2015 Rail- Trail Hall of Fame On the Urban Conservation Trail I SUPPORT Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Name: Stuart Jonas Where I live: My wife and I live in Grand Rapids, Mich. Age: 56 What I do: I am an account manager for a biometric firm, although I have been back to work for only a few months because of an illness I’ve had for the past five years. My hobbies are playing my custom-built guitar, and riding a bike when the weather and my body will cooperate. I also like to do as a hobby what I do in my job: work with computers. Most inspiring articles I’ve read recently: I have been most inspired by The Grand Rapids Pressarticles by Sue Schroder about other people’s struggles with cancer, since that hits oh so close to home. Latest or greatest accomplishment: I have at least two of them: learning to take care of myself and walk after brain surgery on a non-malignant tumor; then, six months later, surviving stage 4 Non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma. I like to think that the thought of riding with my friends was one of the most powerful motivators I had, next to my family. I’d rather be: ME—because others may look appealing, but their lives might have the same ups and downs as mine. And, who knows, theirs could be worse. Besides, I have come to like who I am and what I am.
  • Things to Do List.Xlsx

    Things to Do List.Xlsx

    The Big List of Things to Do in Hawk Mountian Council and the Surrounding Parts of Pennsylvania Name Description County Type Address City ZIP Phone # Hours Cost 3,965 acres of preserved battlefield from the Park: Free pivitol 1863 battle, including the National Park: Apr‐Oct 8AM‐Museum: (Group) Cemetary where the Gettysburg Address was 6PM 13+: $9 ($8) delivered. Attached museum displays recovered Visitor Center: Apr‐ 6‐12: $7 ($7) artifacts from the battle. Gettysburg National Military Park Adams Historic 1195 Baltimore Pk Gettysburg 17325 717‐334‐1124 Oct 8‐6 (add. fees for film & McMillan Woods Youth Campground available for Nov‐Mar 8‐5 cyclorama) Scouts & youth groups with prior registration at Campground: Campground: $9‐ low‐cost ($9‐10, no charge per person). "Historic 24hrs $10 reservation fee, Trails" award available through New Birth of campers are free Freedom Council. Visitor Center is Childhood home of pioneer Daniel Boone. Shows a free; $3 self‐guided Changes with living farm and life in early America. Short hiking tour. Guided season, call for Daniel Boone Homestead trails available. Fishing permitted with valid Berks Historic 400 Daniel Boone Rd Birdsboro 19508 610‐582‐4900 Tours most accurate license. Picnic space available. Cabin and tent 16+ $7 information. camping available for a fee. 5‐15 $4 65+/Groups 10+ $6 Museum dedicated to preservation of & education about local automotive history, highlighting equipment/vehicles made in PA. Also preserves a 60+: $7 9:30AM‐4PM, Boyertown Museum of Historic Vehicles 1921 Sunoco gas station, the 1938 Fegely's Berks Museum 85 S Walnut St Boyertown 19512 610‐367‐2090 16‐59: $7 7 days a week Reading Diner, a reconstructed blacksmith forge, 0‐14: Free and a belt‐driven machine shop.