DOCSLIB.ORG

Pennsylvania's Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pennsylvania’sPennsylvania’s RecreationRecreation PlanPlan 2004-20082004-2008 Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Edward G. Rendell, Governor Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Michael DiBerardinis, Secretary Richard D. Sprenkle Deputy Secretary for Conservation and Engineering Services Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Larry G. Williamson, Director April 2004 i The Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation Would like to thank the citizens of Pennsylvania, federal, state and local agencies and private and non-profit organizations for their assistance in the development of Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan 2004-2008 Interagency Recreation Planning and Greenways Advisory Committee Pennsylvania Department of Aging Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Sandra Robison, Director Bureau of Farmland Preservation Rob Davidson Bureau of Farmland Preservation Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development Neil R. Kinsey, Local Government Policy Specialist Center for Local Government Services Courtney Carlson Tourism Marketing Pennsylvania Department of Education Patricia Vathis, Environmental Education Advisor Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Julia Anastasio, Director Policy Office Pennsylvania Fish And Boat Commission Tom Ford, Resources Planning Coordinator Pennsylvania Game Commission Thomas Wylie Executive Office Pennsylvania Department of Health Leslie Best, Director Bureau of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention Lisa Bailey-Davis Bureau of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention ii Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Susan Zacher Historic Preservation Supervisor Bureau of Historic Preservation Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency Pennsylvania Utility Commission Stanley Brown David Salapa Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Dante Accurti, Manager Transportation Enhancements and Greenways Pennsylvania Department of General Services Erin M. Murphy Assistant Director Bureau of Real Estate Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Meredith Hill Office of Policy Andy Evans Bureau of State Parks Dan Devlin/Matt Beaver Bureau of Forestry Charles Trovel Bureau of Facility Design Kristen Reinertsen Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey Vanyla Tierney Bureau of Recreation and Conservation iii PENNSYLVANIA'S RECREATION PLAN 2004-2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. What is Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan B. Why Does Pennsylvania Develop a Statewide Recreation Plan C. Land and Water Conservation Fund D. Overview of Statewide Recreation Planning Within the Commonwealth CHAPTER 1 A Vision for the Future A. Introduction 1. Funding 2. New Agency 3. Pennsylvania Greenways: An Action Plan for Creating Connections B. Planning Process and Public Participation 1. Regional Stakeholders Public Participation Workshops 2. Pennsylvania Recreation Needs Survey 3. Pennsylvania Participation Survey 4. Shaping a Sustainable Pennsylvania – DCNR’s Blueprint for Action 5. State Forest Resource Management Plan 6. Pennsylvania Heritage Tourism Development Plan 7. Pennsylvania Comprehensive Nutrition and Physical Activity Plan 8. Pennsylvania’s Wildlife and Wild Places – Our Outdoor Heritage in Peril 9. Back to Prosperity: A Competitive Agenda for Renewing Pennsylvania C. New Trends and Directions for the Future CHAPTER 2 The Benefits and Scope of Recreation in Today’s World A. Introduction B. An Overview of Recreation-Related Community Initiatives 1. Land use Planning 2. Smart Growth 3. Sustainable Development 4. Watershed Protection 5. Environmental Stewardship C. Open Space Conservation 1. Green Infrastructure 2. Biodiversity D. Greenways E. Tourism F. Public Health 1. Physical Benefits 2. Psychological Benefits iv CHAPTER 3 Recreation Participation A. Introduction B. Leisure, Physical and General Outdoor Activities C. Participation in Outdoor Recreation, General Measures D. Participation in Specific Recreation Activities E. Most Popular Activities by Demographic Group F. Trends in Outdoor Recreation Participation, 1990-2003 G. Comparing Outdoor Recreation Participation in Pennsylvania to the United States H. Per Participant and Per Capita Activity Days I. Per Capita Activity Days by Demographic Groups J. Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania CHAPTER 4 Recreation Needs Analysis A. Pennsylvania Recreation Needs B. Overview of Major Recreation Trends: 1980-2003 C. Participation in Recreation D. Barriers to Recreation E. Use of the Internet F. Recreation Needs and Activities G. Program Needs H. Needs of Special Citizens I. Importance of Recreation J. Attitudes Towards to Recreation K. Recreation Funding L. Regional Differences M. Differences Between Nonwhite and White Racial Groups CHAPTER 5 Issues and Findings A. Department of Community and Economic Development B. Department of Transportation C. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission D. Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission E. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources F. Regional Stakeholders Meeting CHAPTER 6 Priorities for Future CHAPTERS 7 Action Plan A. Priority I: Funding B. Priority 2: Create More Healthy and Livable Communities C. Priority 3: Build Capacity v APPENDICES Appendix 1 Wetlands Plan Appendix 2 Stakeholders Meetings Appendix 3 History of LWCF Funding in Pennsylvania Appendix 4 Data Tables from Participation Study Appendix 5 Data Tables for Needs Survey Appendix 6 Shaping A Sustainable Pennsylvania – DCNR’s Blueprint For Action Appendix 7 DCNR White Papers RESOURCES Resource 1 State Forest Resource Management Plan – Recreation Section Resource 2 Pennsylvania Greenways: An Action Plan For Creating Connections Resource 3 Regional Stakeholders Public Participation Workshops Resource 4 Nature-Based Tourism Policy Resource 5 Pennsylvania Heritage Tourism Development Plan Resource 6 Pennsylvania Comprehensive Nutrition And Physical Activity Plan Resource 7 Pennsylvania’s Wildlife And Wild Places – Our Outdoor Heritage in Peril Resource 8 Back to Prosperity: A Competitive Agenda for Renewing Pennsylvania Resource 9 A New Vision for Hiking/Foot Trails in Pennsylvania vi IntroductionIntroduction INTRODUCTION What is Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan provides a vision for the future of recreation. As a result of extensive research and public participation it reflects the concerns of its citizens and the strategies for implementation as detailed by providers of park and recreation services throughout the state. • It serves as the Commonwealth’s official policy document for identifying recreational issues, needs, policies and capital investment priorities. • It is a guide for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation and protection of resources and provision of recreation opportunities and services to the state’s citizens and visitors. • It provides a framework for ensuring the protection of Pennsylvania’s highly valued cultural and natural resources, and enhancing existing recreational opportunities within the Commonwealth. Why Does Pennsylvania Develop A Statewide Recreation Plan The primary reason that the state has developed a statewide recreation plan is because it is necessary to have priorities and strategies to help meet the recreational needs of its citizens, a thorough understanding of the trends and issues, stakeholders participate in the development of the priorities and strategies so they are aware of what is needed to reach the desired goals. The state also develops a statewide recreation plan to ensure that Pennsylvania remains eligible to receive federal Land and Water Conservation Funds. Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund In 1958, increasing consciousness of public health and environmental issues and an expanding need for recreational space combined into a bipartisan mandate creating the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC). After three years of research, the Commission developed specific recommendations for a national recreation program. The ORRRC report of 1961 emphasized that State and local, as well as Federal, governments and the private sector were key elements in the total effort to make outdoor recreation opportunities available. The Commission's major recommendations were: 1) The United States should establish a national recreation policy to preserve, develop and make accessible to all Americans the resources needed "for 1 individual enjoyment and to assure the physical, cultural, and spiritual benefits of outdoor recreation." 2) All agencies administering outdoor recreation resources--public and private-- should adopt programs designed to make the best possible use of available resources in light of people's needs. 3) Each State, through a central agency, should develop a long-range plan for outdoor recreation, to provide adequate opportunities for the public, to acquire additional areas where necessary, and to preserve outstanding natural sites. 4) An independent Bureau of Outdoor Recreation should be established in the Interior Department to lead nationwide efforts by coordinating Federal programs, conducting nationwide planning and assisting other levels of government. 5) A Federal funding program should be established to provide grants to States that would stimulate and assist them to meet new demands for outdoor recreation and to pay for additions to the Federal recreation estate. Largely as a result of ORRRC's work, legislation was proposed that would establish a "Land and Water Conservation
Recommended publications
  • Northeast Philadelphia Venues

    Northeast Philadelphia Venues

    NORTHEAST PHILADELPHIA VENUES Please choose the correct facility below: Philadelphia SC Agusta Fields Philadelphia SC Thornton & Comly Fields Parkwood SC Fields Lighthouse SC Fields Academy Sabres Field Philadelphia Soccer Club - Agusta Field 10402 Decatur Road - Philadelphia, PA 19154 www.philasc.org From Interstate-95: Exit at Woodhaven Rd Take Woodhaven to Thornton Rd. Exit. At the bottom of the ramp, turn left onto Thornton Rd. Follow Thornton to end and turn left onto Comly Road. Follow Comly to first light and turn right onto Decatur Road. Follow Decatur for 3/4 mile. From PA Turnpike (Exit 351): Follow signs for US Highway 1 South. Stay in left lanes and follow US highway 1 to Comly Road for 2 miles. Turn left onto Comly Road. Follow Comly to third light and turn right onto Decatur Road. Follow Decatur for 3/4 mile. From US Highway 1 (Roosevelt Blvd.): Follow US Highway 1 to Comly Road (just south of Woodhaven Road – PA Route 63) Turn onto Comly Road (left if on US 1 South)(right if on US 1 North) Follow Comly to third light and turn right onto Decatur Road. Follow Decatur for 3/4 mile. Philadelphia Soccer Club - Thornton & Comly Roads Palmer Playground / Corner of Thornton & Comly Roads Philadelphia, PA 19154 From Interstate-95: Exit at Woodhaven Road. Take Woodhaven to Thornton Road Exit. At the bottom of the ramp, turn left onto Thornton Road. Follow Thornton 100 yards, fields are on left. From PA Turnpike (Exit 351): Follow signs for US Highway 1 South. Stay in left lanes and follow US 1 to Comly Road for 2 miles.
  • Appendix A: Review of Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Studies

    Appendix A: Review of Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Studies

    APPENDIX A: REVIEW OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLANNING STUDIES This appendix provides an overview of previous planning efforts undertaken in and around Philadelphia that are relevant to the Plan. These include city initiatives, plans, studies, internal memos, and other relevant documents. This appendix briefly summarizes each previous plan or study, discusses its relevance to pedestrian and bicycle planning in Philadelphia, and lists specific recommendations when applicable. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN APRIL 2012 CONTENTS WALKING REPORTS AND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 1 Walking in Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................ 1 South of South Walkabilty Plan................................................................................................................................. 1 North Broad Street Pedestrian Crash Study .............................................................................................................. 2 North Broad Street Pedestrian Safety Audit ............................................................................................................. 3 Pedestrian Safety and Mobility: Status and Initiatives ............................................................................................ 3 Neighborhood/Area Plans and Studies .................................................................................................................
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER

    Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER

    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
  • HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean

    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean

    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean The High Allegheny Plan is a first iteration, a scientific assessment of the ecoregion. As part of the planning process, other aspects of the plan will be developed in future iterations, along with updates to the ecological assessment itself. These include fuller evaluations of threats to the ecoregion, constraints on conservation activities, and implementation strategies. CSS is now developing a standard template for ecoregional plans, which we have applied to the HAL first iteration draft report, distributed in 2002. Some of the HAL results have been edited or updated for this version. Click on the navigation pane to browse the report sections. What is the purpose of the report template? The purpose of creating a standard template for ecoregional plans in the Northeast is twofold: — to compile concise descriptions of methodologies developed and used for ecoregional assessment in the Northeast. These descriptions are meant to meet the needs of planning team members who need authoritative text to include in future plan documents, of science staff who need to respond to questions of methodology, and of program and state directors looking for material for general audience publications. — to create a modular resource whose pieces can be selected, incorporated in various formats, linked to in other documents, and updated easily. How does the template work? Methods are separated from results in this format, and the bulk of our work has gone into the standard methods sections. We have tried to make each methods section stand alone. Every section includes its own citation on the first page.
  • SUMMARY REPORT Exploration of Alternative Corridor Concepts

    SUMMARY REPORT Exploration of Alternative Corridor Concepts

    SUMMARY REPORT Exploration of Alternative Corridor Concepts POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ELEMENTS BUFFALO 1018 ENN DR WM P TOWNSHIP 1005 A 15 I R P O R OLD ROUTE 45 T R D 45 192 BUFFALO RD LEWISBURG BOROUGH SAINT PAUL ST S LY U D T A S ERRACE DR Y R R Q R D E U H 405 N C T E U T S T H S O T E S K A R Y R S H T MA SAIN R N T G T A A M N 5 T T R S E I 1 S A R A I T N U O F S O R L E U I I L T G V T e V E w R Y IN i O s E 4 A b E S 0 S u T rg G R 5 S T B id INi R 2007 A ng O F S T E W S Le R w N M i N sb L T S T S u A S r T KE P AR S g W M & T 7 B AVE T u N H ff TO a G l 6’ - 0” 6’ - 0” 5’ - 0” 14’ - 0” 11’ - 0” 17’ - 0” 11’ - 0” 14’ - 0” 5’ - 0” 6’ - 0” 6’ - 0” IN o 45 ASH S ST W E C AV D r S e AM E e AD k R FAÇADE SIDEWALK BUFFER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE BUFFER SIDEWALK FAÇADE R R S ZONE ZONE AVE D BUCKNELL R 1 N RSO R E 9 FFE V UNIVERSITY T JE A H E S R D N R T L O O Y IN M T E I T N S R E T 15 A R F R I V EAST BUFFALO E R TOWNSHIP R D BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY GOLF CLUB W BETH E E L L S S L E M T A O B N N KE R D T A O A R W N N V R C D H O JAME N S R H D W D Y R N L H A N I R D RD E D R DGE T C T RI ER AN S S R IV AS A B UB RD R SHtEudy Corridor B EAGLE CL P B L E 0 750 1,500 L N Feet PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH: PREPARED BY: 6’ - 0” 6’ - 0” 5’ - 0” 14’ - 0” 11’ - 0” 7’ - 0” 10’ - 0” 11’ - 0” 14’ - 0” 5’ - 0” 6’ - 0” 6’ - 0” FAÇADE SIDEWALK BUFFER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TURNING LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE BUFFER SIDEWALK FAÇADE MARCH 2012 ZONE ZONE THIS IS NOT THE PLAN Figures & Tables Page Page TABLE
  • Connections Spring 2008

    Connections Spring 2008

    Spring Focus of Proposed 2009-2012 TIP 2008 is Bridge Repair/Replacement The proposed 2009-2012 most of the listed projects are Park-n-Ride: 4 projects - Transportation Improvement geared toward system preser- Butler Twp., intersection of Program (TIP) has been de- vation, maintenance, and im- I-80 and PA 309; veloped by the Lackawanna/ provement. These projects in- Luzerne MPO. clude intersection improve- White Haven Borough - loca- ments, existing signal improve- tion undetermined; The TIP comprises the first ments, and road resurfacings. four years of the 12-year pro- Nuangola Borough - SR gram and the Long Range Some of the other projects on 2042 at Exit 159 of I-81; Transportation Plan. It is a the proposed TIP include the listing of projects and line following: Sugarloaf Twp. - Tomhicken items for which funding has Road, near Exit 145 of I-81 Widening: 2 projects - been designated. The proposed TIP is slated to !-81 between the Central Line items are designated be adopted by the MPO at Scranton Expressway and funding sources that can be the July meetings, pending Davis Street Interchanges; used for a particular category the results of the public com- ment period. It will then be project, such as rail, highway Airport Beltway, Hazle Town- reviewed and adopted at the reserve, transportation en- ship hancement, etc., when state and federal levels after needed. New Roadway: 2 projects - which it will become effec- South Valley Parkway which tive as of October 1st. In addition to the line item will provide better access to The public version of the categories, there are specific the Luzerne County Commu- 2009 TIP can be accessed at project listings.
  • Green2015-An-Action-Plan-For-The

    Green2015-An-Action-Plan-For-The

    Green2015 Advisory Group Conveners and Participating Organizations Michael DiBerardinis, Department of Parks and Recreation Commissioner, co-convener Alan Greenberger, Deputy Mayor for Economic Development, co-convener Amtrak Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Fairmount Park Conservancy Fairmount Park Historic Preservation Trust Friends of the Wissahickon Greenspace Alliance Natural Land Trust Neighborhood Gardens Association Next Great City Coalition Office of City Councilman Darrell Clarke Office of Councilwoman Anna Verna Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Environmental Council Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Philadelphia Association of Community Development Corporations Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia Department of Commerce Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections Philadelphia Department of Public Health Philadelphia Department of Public Property Philadelphia Department of Revenue Philadelphia Housing Authority Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation Philadelphia Office of Housing and Community Development Philadelphia Office of Sustainability Philadelphia Office of Transportation and Utilities Philadelphia Orchard Project Philadelphia Parks Alliance Philadelphia Parks and Recreation Commission Philadelphia Water Department Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia School District of Philadelphia Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
  • Volume 32 Number 29 Saturday, July 20, 2002 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages

    Volume 32 Number 29 Saturday, July 20, 2002 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages

    Volume 32 Number 29 Saturday, July 20, 2002 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 3469—3622 See Part II page 3597 for Part I the Department of Health’s regulations Agencies in this issue: concerning Reporting of AIDS, HIV Test The General Assembly The Courts Results, CD4 T-Lymphocyte Counts and Department of Conservation and Natural Perinatal Exposure of Newborns to HIV Resources Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Fish and Boat Commission Human Relations Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Liquor Control Board Milk Marketing Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Port of Pittsburgh Commission State Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons State Conservation Commission State Employees’ Retirement Board Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 332, July 2002 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50. Checks for subscriptions and individual copies should be made payable to ‘‘Fry Communications, Inc.’’ Postmaster send address changes to: Periodicals postage paid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Orders for subscriptions and other circulation matters FRY COMMUNICATIONS should be sent to: Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin 800 W.
  • Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017

    Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study 2017

    TOWN OF DEDHAM HERITAGE RAIL TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY 2017 PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully recognize the Town of Dedham’s dedicated Planning and Environmental Department’s staff, including Richard McCarthy, Town Planner and Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator, each of whom helped to guide this feasibility study effort. Their commitment to the town and its open space system will yield positive benefits to all as they seek to evaluate projects like this potential rail trail. Special thanks to the many representatives of the Town of Dedham for their commitment to evaluate the feasibility of the Heritage Rail Trail. We also thank the many community members who came out for the public and private forums to express their concerns in person. The recommendations contained in the Heritage Rail Trail Feasibility Study represent our best professional judgment and expertise tempered by the unique perspectives of each of the participants to the process. Cheri Ruane, RLA Vice President Weston & Sampson June 2017 Special thanks to: Virginia LeClair, Environmental Coordinator Richard McCarthy, Town Planner Residents of Dedham Friends of the Dedham Heritage Rail Trail Dedham Taxpayers for Responsible Spending Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Community Outreach and Public Process 3. Base Mapping and Existing Conditions 4. Rail Corridor Segments 5. Key Considerations 6. Preliminary Trail Alignment 7. Opinion of Probable Cost 8. Phasing and Implementation 9. Conclusion Page | 2 Introduction and Background Weston & Sampson was selected through a proposal process by the Town of Dedham to complete a Feasibility Study for a proposed Heritage Rail Trail in Dedham, Massachusetts.
  • Throwing Caution to the Wind: the Growing Threat of Industrial Wind Energy Development in Pennsylvania to Wildlife, Habitat and Public Lands

    Throwing Caution to the Wind: the Growing Threat of Industrial Wind Energy Development in Pennsylvania to Wildlife, Habitat and Public Lands

    Throwing Caution to the Wind: the growing threat of Industrial Wind Energy Development in Pennsylvania to Wildlife, Habitat and Public Lands Dan Boone Consulting Conservation Biologist Presented at the public meeting held by Save Our Allegheny Ridges Bedford, PA September 18, 2006 ELECTRICITY IS THE MAJOR SOURCE OF “ENERGY” RELIED ON BY THE U.S., BUT THE FOSSIL FUELS USED FOR OTHER FORMS OF ENERGY CONTRIBUTE MORE TO CLIMATE CHANGE. WIND TURBINES ONLY GENERATE ELECTRICITY AND ARE EXPECTED TO SUPPLY ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF FUTURE ENERGY NEEDS SOURCE: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2001 ONLY 1/3 OF THE U.S. TOTAL EMISSIONS OF GREEN HOUSE GAS (GHG) IS DUE TO POWER PLANTS Note: Emissions from electricity produced by industries but sold to the grid is included in the "Industrial" category. Excludes emissions from U.S. territories. Source: US EPA, 2001. http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures/fig13.cfm SOURCE: Bruce Bailey - http://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/energy_workshops_04_04/wind_bailey.pdf Less than 5% of nation’s developable wind energy potential occurs on uplands east of Mississippi River Wind energy potential in the United States. Areas with Wind Power Class 3 and above are considered economical to develop. Most of the inland wind potential is in the Midwest. In Pennsylvania most of the wind potential is on ridgetops and along shoreline and in Lake Erie. Areas with high wind potential on the mountain ridges are narrow lines that don’t show up well at this map scale. (From National
  • HISTORY of PENNSYLVANIA's STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015

    HISTORY of PENNSYLVANIA's STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015

    i HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA'S STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015 By William C. Forrey Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Office of Parks and Forestry Bureau of State Parks Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Copyright © 2017 – 1st edition ii iii Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I: The History of Pennsylvania Bureau of State Parks… 1980s ............................................................ 1 CHAPTER II: 1990s - State Parks 2000, 100th Anniversary, and Key 93 ............................................................. 13 CHAPTER III: 21st CENTURY - Growing Greener and State Park Improvements ............................................... 27 About the Author .............................................................................................................................................. 58 APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................................... 60 TABLE 1: Pennsylvania State Parks Directors ................................................................................................ 61 TABLE 2: Department Leadership .................................................................................................................
  • E-Zpass-Only’ Interchange Opens in Bucks County Today Eastbound On/Off Ramps Will Link Interstate 276 and State Route 132 (Street Road)

    E-Zpass-Only’ Interchange Opens in Bucks County Today Eastbound On/Off Ramps Will Link Interstate 276 and State Route 132 (Street Road)

    Media Contact: Mimi Doyle at 610-239-4117 Communications and Public Relations [email protected] New Pa. Turnpike ‘E-ZPass-Only’ Interchange Opens in Bucks County Today Eastbound on/off ramps will link Interstate 276 and State Route 132 (Street Road). The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (PTC) today will open a new E-ZPass Only Interchange in Bensalem Township, Bucks County, approximately one-half mile east of its Bensalem Interchange (Exit #351). Officials anticipate opening the partial interchange following a ribbon- cutting ceremony set to start at 11:30 a.m. The so-called All Electronic Interchange (AEI) -- to be designated as the Street Road Interchange (Exit #352) -- will only accommodate eastbound entering and eastbound exiting traffic and offer direct Pa. Turnpike access via Street Road (State Route 132) between the Parx Casino, Bensalem, Pa., and U.S. Route 1. Only motorists with an active E-ZPass account will be eligible to utilize the Street Road AEI. All E-ZPass tags from any of the 24 affiliated tolling agencies in 14 states (primarily in the Northeastern U.S.) will be accepted. Non-E-ZPass (cash-paying) motorists who try to use the interchange will receive a video-toll violation in the mail and are liable to pay the toll from the farthest Pa. Turnpike entry point plus administrative fees. The cost to exit via the new interchange from points west will be the same toll as if exiting at Delaware Valley (#358). For those who got on the Turnpike at Street Road, the toll at the two plazas east of the AEI -- Delaware Valley #358 and Delaware River Bridge #359 -- will be the same as if entering at Bensalem (formerly the Philadelphia Interchange).