• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Man In India, 96 (4) : 995-1009 © Serials Publications MUSLIM LEAGUE, HINDU-MAHASABHA AND THE PARTITION OF INDIA Hilal Ahmad Dar1 and Munendra Singh2 The partition of India was significant events of south Asian history. It not only divides the territory of Indian subcontinent, but also destroyed the unity and diversity that was the earlier strength of this region. Many historians studied partition from single dimension perspective like role of British government, Muslim league, Indian national congress and Hindu Mahasabha. However, multidimensional studies on this issue were not focussed by the scholars. Against this background the present study covered the role of foresaid agencies in the partition. It provides the clear picture and involvement of all these agencies together in the partition of India. The required documents were collected from the Punjab state and national achieves. The study reflects that arrogant, antagonistic and hostile situation created by the various agencies and organisations in the partition. INTRODUCTION On 15th of August 1947 India was declared independent after which two sovereign states arose on the map of world, the Dominion of Pakistan and the Union of India on 14th and 15th of August 1947. The Muslims and Hindus of the subcontinent acquired two separate countries and the struggle for independence had reached its completion. The Partition of India 1947 was an event of momentous significance for the three major communities, Hindus Muslims and Sikhs who were at that eve existing in the subcontinent. It was extremely subtle matter where communities turn into nationalities. The event marked the largest inhuman activities of loot plundering and killing. Earlier before India’s partition, normally there were several schools of religion and politics, The Indian National Congress, the Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim league. Both the parties along with British played a keen role in Partition of India. This study will be mostly focusing activities and ideologies of Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha. The first section of the paper discussing about the Muslim league and its existence, Muslim league got established for what and how its tastes got changed after 1936-37 elections. Many other things will be discussed how Muslim league fanned communalism by declaring the ‘Deliverance Day’ and the ‘Direct Action Day’. The second chapter will be dealing with establishment of Hindu Mahasabha, how the Mahasabhaites patronized anti-muslim activities which play prominent role in bringing ethnic conflicts and later led to the deveining of India 1947. The 1 Master of Arts in History at the School of Arts and Languages in Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India. 2 Assistant Professor in History at the School of Arts and Language in Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India, E-mail: [email protected] 996 MAN IN INDIA chapter will be discussing about the nature and ideologies of V.D Savarkar regarding other communities. The third and chapter will be talking about the negotiations between the Hindu-Mahasabha and the Muslim league and their outcome (Mohammad Ali Siddiqui, 2010). The Mahasabha has been titled as one of the utmost Hindu organization during 1930s and 1940s. The Congress party was established in 1885 with an understanding to represent all the communities of India. Lastly Muslim league which was political and religious party of Muslims established in 1906 for safeguarding the Interests of the Muslims. Earlier Partition there was much more differences of Religion, Caste, Tradition, life style among communities which also played a key role in the Partition of India. According to some scholars the partition of India 1947 was the plan of Britishers and implementing by them. Here we will be discussing regarding the role of British in Partition of India and now communities became Nationalities (Tony Ballantyne, 2003). The British advent in India was an act driven by commercial encouragements under the benefaction of the East India Company. For hundreds of years the English had been the meek campaigners of the Mughal rulers. This condition, however, undertook transformation and by the mid of the 18th century their influence began to rise in all quarters. By means of tact, power and exploitation the process of the attaining the Indian empire continued for another hundred years. The War of Independence and native struggle for freedom ended in a calamity in 1857, after which the British rule properly started in India. The central of British command and control stayed a policy based upon encouraging a communal rupture among the two main communities of India the Hindus and the Muslims to assist and secure their occupation. The dissimilarities between these two groups already was and varied from religion to culture and from economy to politics, but grew out of section under the tutelage of imperialism. The Hindus and the Muslims organized themselves into political organisations, the Hindu Mahasabha, Congress and the Muslim League respectively, to muse on communal problems and the safeguard of their interests. The demand for Independence and Freedom from the British became a common cry all over the subcontinent. India was divided as the result of a long struggle for freedom and independence. Authority was shifted from British hands to India and Pakistan on the basis of domain status under agreement with the 3 June plan, which was accepted and conceded by the main Indian Leaders. It was a task of tremendous restraint and entailed all the problems of partition of territory and separation of resources, at a time of increasing tension and havoc (Richard Gordon, 1975). Till revolt of 1857 there was no evidence appeal of the domestic notion in the method it has arisen to undertake in the colonial Indian profane Nationalism and the two Nation concepts ‘Pakistan’. The awake of India or extra appropriately of Hindustan took a nebulous existence too in an era after orientations of a ‘qaum’ MUSLIM LEAGUE, HINDU-MAHASABHA... 997 merely very insecurely changeable as a nation, and watan, or regional homeland, did not reduce the idea of either a Muslim or an Indian nationalism. There was as however no clear tension in an affinity to one’s city, a region, Hind and a religiously cognizant cultural personality. Before the meet with colonization, religiously informed cultural changes had created mien in works. 3Conversely even in their social and political performances, differences along lines of religion were negotiable and approachable to accommodations. Pre-colonial approaches of collective query and depiction did not remark Hinduism and Islam as two conflicting beliefs; religion was not ever a problem of political irrelevance for either Muslim or Hindu sovereign’s. The colonial state’s itemized strategy of disinterest centred on indifference towards religion was a produced of expediency, not opinion. Necessitating to proper standing ciphers of cultural legality, religion cannot ever be a problem of political indifference for the British. Inherent to the search for traitors and the association of social mechanism, religion in the check of the colonial state’s political tenacities had qualitatively different consequences than those in the preceding centuries. British acuities of Indian society as an accretion of religious groups gave push to representations of individuality in expressions underscoring alterations, not unities between those who among other things ensued to be Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Jain and Christian. However British communal causing on its own cannot clarify the strength of the process marking Indian efforts to array the sets of the expatriate state to their own social and political improvement. Indian partiality, whether inferred in its separate or communitarian colours, instituted a vital aspect in the study on identity in the late nineteenth century. Taking plus of a hastily rising media and publications market, those claiming to epitomize ‘Hindu’ or ‘Muslim’ comforts predictable their exactly class and regional anxieties in terms of religious communitarianism (Mary Louise Becker, 2014). Yet the dialog of the elite was inside extra separated than unified. There was a fine difference concerning the communitarian privileges of the elite discourse, entreating as it does the longer religious community dribbling over spatial limits and the intricate, and frequently equivocal, crescendos at the social base. Through the seizure of the time the awareness of a separate Indian Muslim concern that desired representative was stated in requests intended at appealing an audience. The provincial assortments in the statuses of Muslims in the provinces of education and government employment scurried many efforts to terrain assertions on their behalf in all-India rapports. Interior splits within the community left exposed the option of at least certain Muslims recommending Congress’s bid to express on behalf of all Indians. Class and local context, rather than overtly religious negotiations, remained key sorts in the making of such a choice. Race for professions in the colonial service retained many Muslims from creating joint reason with their Hindu neighbours. Muslims with jobs in administration valour support ideas of independence but might not keenly contribute in a group which, though modest 998 MAN IN INDIA in its purposes and approaches, was in attitude pitted against the colonial state. The support of the Congress was delivered by attorneys and traders, professions in which Muslims were comparatively insufficient and extreme between. Muslim classes, keenly persuaded by the British as the suppressing of the revolt, were not inclined to put the colonial state’s collective links to the check. Self-preservation, if not self-promotion, made numerous Muslims unenthusiastic to delay their coaches with a mostly Hindu dominated Congress. It was eventually the equalities among diverse communities in the areas which resolute the level of Muslim chains for Congress form of anti-colonial patriotism. The mid era of the World War first initiate the moderates sewing barriers with former radicals who had divided ways in 1907, and cumulative collaboration between the Indian National Congress and the All-India Muslim League.

Load more

  15

Copy Link