DOCSLIB.ORG

Does the Bible Permit Christians to Eat "Unclean" Meat in New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does the Bible Permit Christians to Eat DOES THE BIBLE PERMIT CHRISTIANS TO EAT “UNCLEAN” MEAT IN NEW TESTAMENT TIMES? Steven M. Collins 3901 Crescent Drive Sioux Falls, SD 57106 Copyright 1994 Steven M. Collins For more Bible literature contact: Shelter in the Word PO Box 107, Perry, Michigan 48872-0107 Tel: 517-625-7480 Fax: 517-625-7481 E-mail: [email protected] During the pre-Christian era, it is a well- 3. These aspects of the Law of Moses are found known fact that God forbade the Israelites to eat literally adjacent to the chapter on dietary laws certain types of animal flesh. While the Israelites (Leviticus 11). Since Joseph and Mary frequently disobeyed God’s instructions, it was scrupulously observed Leviticus 12 in rearing quite clear that God’s law prohibited the Jesus, it follows that they scrupulously observed consumption of pork, shellfish and other types of Leviticus 11 in their choice of meats which were animal flesh. Therefore, if a person ate “unclean” fed to Jesus and the rest of their children. The food in Old Testament times, it was because they observant nature of Jesus’ family is further were choosing to disobey God’s instructions, not confirmed in Luke 2:39: “And when they [Joseph because they felt they had a divine authorization to and Mary] had performed all things according to consume such meats. the law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee.” In the modern world, most Christians [Notice that Luke does not call these Old consume “unclean” meats not out of rebellion, but Testament requirements the “law of Moses.” but because of a belief that New Testament scriptures refers to them as the “law of the Lord.”—a subtle, permit them to do so. The belief that Old but important indicator of the early Christian Testament instructions on the consumption of church’s views about Old Testament laws.] Luke animal flesh are no longer applicable is often 2:41 adds that Joseph and Mary kept the Feast of referred to as “Christian liberty” (i.e. “freedom” Passover “every year” at Jerusalem. It is not clear from the “restrictions” of the Old Testament). This whether they brought their children with them article will examine the subject of “unclean meats” every year, but verse 42 states that they brought from biblical and scientific viewpoints in an effort Jesus with them to Jerusalem for the Passover to determine what the “New Testament” Christian Feast when Jesus was twelve years old. viewpoint on this subject should be. The answer During his adult years, the scriptures portray will reveal whether modern Christians are (A) Jesus as being loyal to the “observant” traditions of exercising “liberty” to eat unclean meats or (B) his parents. We know that Jesus was careful to ignoring God’s guidance on the subject. observe the Passover and Days of Unleavened In the Old Testament, the issue was clear: God Bread (Matthew 26:17-19), and that he participated said to avoid eating the flesh of certain animals. It in the “Last Great Day” of the Feast of Tabernacles is in New Testament times that the issue has (John 7:37). In Matthew 5:17-18, Jesus openly become blurred. The Old Testament meat declared his allegiance to the Old Testament Laws instructions are still found in Leviticus 11 and of God (i.e. “law of Moses”). He emphatically Deuteronomy 14 in our Bibles. Clearly, anyone stated: who eats forbidden animal flesh is disobeying “think not that I am come to destroy the law those scriptures. However, do they have the or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to “liberty to do so as a result of New Testament fulfill... Till heaven and earth pass, one jot [a dot scriptures? A deeper question is: if God really has of the i] or one tittle [a cross of the t] shall in no abolished his Old Testament dietary laws, is there wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” any empirical physical evidence to support that Whew! Jesus’ affirmation that his coming will conclusion? abolish “nothing” from the Old Testament laws of At Mt. Sinai, God gave Moses not only the God ought to give all modern Christians pause Ten Commandments but also many divine about assuming Jesus made any major changes in instructions about personal behavior, methods of the observance of the dietary laws. Two truisms of worship and lifestyle choices. These divine biblical study are as follows: (A) The words of instructions came to be known as the “law of God (in the Old Testament) and Jesus Christ (in Moses” even though they were actually “the law of the New Testament) carry more scriptural authority God given to Moses.” When Jesus Christ lived his than the words of their human followers, and (B) physical life, many often forget he was reared as a one must interpret vague scriptures in light of the devout Jew. After Jesus’ birth, Joseph and Mary meaning of clear scriptures, not vice versa. observed the seven-day purification period for Applying both these truisms, any vague passages in women, and also had Jesus circumcised on the New Testament books must be interpreted in a eighth day (Luke 2:21-23), according to the manner consistent with the clear declaration of instructions of the law of Moses in Leviticus 12:1- Jesus Christ in Matthew 5:17. Given the 2 vehemence of Jesus’ support for God’s Old devout obedience to the laws of God (which Testament laws in Matthew 5:17-18, we must including the dietary laws throughout his life. insist on finding very explicit evidence in the New Nowhere in the scriptures is Paul accused by his Testament that something was “done away” before detractors of “eating unclean meats.” we abandon the practice. This is particularly true in Having said the above, it needs to be the case of Paul’s writings as Peter warned that acknowledged that some things were “done away Paul’s writings were easy to misunderstand (II with” in the New Testament. Clear scriptures Peter 3:16). It is noteworthy that while God record that the New Testament did abolish the canonized many of Paul’s writings, Peter’s need for animal sacrifices and the various rites warning about their difficult doctrinal application associated with those sacrifices (Hebrews 9:9-15, was also canonized. If Paul’s words were easily 10:4). It is also clear that the requirement of misunderstood in his own time and in his own physical circumcision was abolished (I Corinthians culture, how much easier might it be for us to 7:19 Galatians 6:15). Some might say: “See, that misunderstand Paul’s writings when we not only means the whole law of Moses was abolished,” but read Paul’s words in a different language but are that is a recklessly broad claim. Since the Ten also two millennia removed from his historical Commandments were part of the “law of Moses,” context? an assertion that the whole “law of Moses” was Hebrews 13:8 tells us that Jesus Christ is: “done away with” also asserts the Ten “... the same yesterday, today and forever. Commandments were “done away with.” Does that Be not carried about with divers and strange mean Christians are now “free” to rob banks, lie, doctrines.” sleep with anyone they want to and murder at Here the writer of Hebrews warns against will?” Of course not! Paul himself expressed following false doctrines by reminding the reader amazement that people had gotten the idea that that Jesus Christ’s doctrines not only “did not New Testament faith “did away with” the laws of change” but also “will never change.” Does this God. He wrote in Romans 3:31: scripture sound like Jesus Christ was one to “Do we then make void the law through radically alter the Old Testament laws of God? faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” Quite the contrary, the scriptural evidence is that Therefore, we must carefully evaluate the Jesus supported and practiced them faithfully scriptures to see what requirements really were during his entire life. “done away.” Let us begin with the need for animal It is apparent that Jesus Christ and his sacrifices and the rituals associated with them. In disciples obeyed the dietary laws of Leviticus 11 Jeremiah 7:22-24, God stated: and Deuteronomy 14. The fact that there is no “For when I brought your ancestors out of mention of any controversy about this point Egypt, I said nothing to them, gave no orders, between Jesus and the Pharisees makes this about burnt offerings or sacrifices. My one evident. The Pharisees were eagerly looking for command to them was this: Listen to my voice, grounds to accuse Jesus on religious grounds to then I will be your God and you shall be my undermine his popularity with the masses. If Jesus people... but they did not listen.” (New Jerusalem (or his followers) had ever eaten unclean meats, Bible) the Pharisees would have made it one of their God Himself stated that the sacrificial laws central accusations against him. Likewise, if the and rituals were not a part of his original laws early New Testament church had eaten unclean given to Israel, but were added later because the meats, it would have been a “cause celebre” in the Israelites did not obey him. Since they were not a book of Acts. The fact that there were no part of God’s original laws, their abolition in the controversies in the gospels about eating pork, New Testament does nothing to revoke the main shellfish, etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revolving Beast: Identifying the Animal in Post-Revolutionary Russian Literature
    Revolving Beast: Identifying the Animal in post-Revolutionary Russian Literature by Eric D. Ford A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Slavic Languages and Literatures) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Sofya Khagi, Chair Associate Professor Herbert J. Eagle Professor Peggy S. McCracken Assistant Professor Benjamin B. Paloff In memory of my brother Jason Ford (1970 - 2012) ii Acknowledgments This dissertation would not have been written without the support and encouragement of several people at the University of Michigan. I am especially indebted to two individuals: Herb Eagle, who served admirably as chair of the Slavic Department for the majority of my time at the university, and who gave invaluable help and advice during some particularly trying times; and Sofya Khagi, my advisor, with whom I have had the great pleasure of working over the past several years. She has been a wonderful mentor, colleague, and friend. I am deeply grateful to my other committee members, Peggy McCracken and Benjamin Paloff, who read my dissertation carefully and provided very helpful criticism and suggestions. I would also like to thank the talented and dedicated faculty of the Slavic department with whom I’ve worked as student and colleague: Olga Maiorova, Mikhail Krutikov, Tatjana Aleksić, Jindrich Toman, Svitlana Rogovyk, Nina Shkolnik, Natalia Kondrashova, Eugene Bondarenko, and Omry Ronen. Thanks also to the many fellow graduate students I’ve had the pleasure of knowing and working with: Aleksandar Bošković, Vlad Beronja, Yana Arnold, Jessica Zychowicz, Renee Scherer, Adam Kolkman, Sarah Sutter, Jodi Grieg, Marin Turk, Jamie Parsons, Olga Greco, Paulina Duda, Haley Laurila, Jason Wagner, and Grace Mahoney.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tradition of Pig Hunting in the Minangkabau Community
    Opción, Año 35, Especial No.21 (2019): 1378-1393 ISSN 1012-1587/ISSNe: 2477-9385 The tradition of pig hunting in the Minangkabau community Zainuddin Zainuddin1 1Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Batusangkar, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia [email protected] Zulkifli2 2Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Batusangkar, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia [email protected] Muhammad Kristiawan3* 3Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract This study investigated the tradition of hunting pigs in Minangkabau, Indonesia. The data were collected through interviews with pig hunting participants and through observation at several hunting locations. It was found that the Minangkabau community, especially pig hunters, did not feel the tradition of hunting pigs was in conflict with the religious Shari'a that they believed. In conclusion, in today’s world, interpretations of religions are no longer isolated, local, and more or less single; rather, many angles of interpretation exist side by side and are accessible to all. Keywords: Tradition, Hunting, Pig, Society, Minangkabau. La tradición de la caza de cerdos en la comunidad de Minangkabau Resumen Este estudio investigó la tradición de la caza de cerdos en Minangkabau, Indonesia. Los datos se recopilaron a través de Recibido: 10-03-2019 Aceptado: 15-04-2019 1379 Zainuddin Zainuddin et al. Opción, Año 35, Especial No.21 (2019): 1378-1393 entrevistas con participantes de la caza de cerdos y mediante observación en varios lugares de caza. Se descubrió que la comunidad de Minangkabau, especialmente los cazadores de cerdos, no creía que la tradición de cazar cerdos estuviera en conflicto con la religiosa sharia que ellos creían.
    [Show full text]
  • Pig Taboos in the Ancient Near East
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 13; November 2014 Pig Taboos in the Ancient near East Koot van Wyk* Abstract The cardinal study on the topic of pig eating in the Ancient Near East, is the work of Billie Jean Collins (2006). She focused basically on the issue as it relates to the Hittite cuneiform texts but did also probe sideways to other nations and the Bible, albeit minor comments. This study wishes to stand on the shoulders of Collins, adjusting some statements, adding other aspects from Archaeological sites and Gerhard Hasel’s explanation of Clean and Unclean in Leviticus 11. What was found in this presentation, is that chronology as backbone in the Scriptures, if taken seriously, could explain the presence or absence of pig eating practices also among the Hittites and Egyptians (the New Kingdom). This research has investigated Collins’ contribution of Hittites and Pig Consumption, Pigs in Hittite archaeology, Pigs in Egypt, Pigs in Mesopotamia, Pigs in Zoo-archaeology at Hesban in Transjordan, Pigs at Sites in Canaan, Pigs as Offerings in Hittite Rituals, Pig Taboo Rules in the Ancient Near East, Pigs as Medical Use in Mesopotamia, Pig Taboo in the Old Testament by Ackerman (1992) and Collins (2006), Pig Taboo among Later Greeks, Pig Taboo in the Old Testament by Gerhard Hasel (1991, 1994). Whereas the other Nations around Israel display an S-curve or down-trend and up-trend in the appearance and disappearance of evidence for the taboo against pig-eating, among the Israelites it was a straight line unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • 613-Laws-2.Pdf
    Yahweh’s 613 Laws Deuteronomy 6:25 And it will be OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS if we observe to do all of these Laws before Yahweh our Father, as He has commanded us. Yahweh’s 613 Laws A Reference Guide Copyright © 1997, 2003 by Yisrayl Hawkins All Rights Reserved Published by The House of Yahweh The Pillar and Ground of the Truth. I Timothy 3:15 P.O. Box 2498, Abilene, Texas 79604 325-893-5899 · 325-672-5420 USA: 1-800-613-9494 [email protected] · www.yahweh.com Publishers of The Prophetic Word Magazine, Bringing News in Advance! A HOUSE OF YAHWEH®TM Publication The Book of Yahweh, The Holy Scriptures published by The House of Yahweh used throughout, unless otherwise indicated Deuteronomy 32:47 These are not just idle words for you—these Laws mean Life to you... Yahweh’s 613 Laws A Reference Guide The 248 Positive Commandments The Worship Of Yahweh 8 Walk in Yahweh’s Ways. .Deuteronomy 28:9— 1 Believe in Yahweh hwhy as the Only Source of Yahweh will establish you as His holy people unto Himself, as Power in the Universe. He promised you on oath, if you will keep the Laws of Yahweh .Exodus 20:2— your Father, and WALK IN ALL HIS WAYS. I AM YAHWEH your Heavenly Father Who brought you out of See also: Gen 17:1 Deut 26:17 the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 9 Sanctify Yahweh’s Name. See also: Gen 1:1 Ex 3:13-15 Deut 32:39 Isa 42:8 Isa 45:5 .Leviticus 22:32— You shall not profane My Holy Name, but I WILL BE 2 Submit to Yahweh as the Supreme Head, to be in HALLOWED AMONG THE CHILDREN OF ISRAYL.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and Animal Welfare (A Compilation of Religious Views)
    Islam and Animal Welfare (A compilation of religious views) Published on the occasion of 2015 Compiled by: Dr.Miftahul Islam Barbaruah Published under project: Animal welfare through the lenses of religious faiths in India Vet Helpline India Pvt. Ltd. (4th October ’2015) 1 CONTENTS 1. Rationale .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Understanding animal welfare and its importance ............................................................................... 4 3. Islam on prevention of cruelty to animals ................................................................................................. 6 4. Animal sacrifice and Islam ............................................................................................................................ 10 5. Islam on dogs ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 6. Islam on pigs ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 7. Islam on blood sport ........................................................................................................................................ 11 8. Islam on use of animals in research and war ........................................................................................ 12 9. Islam on slaughter
    [Show full text]
  • Joe M. Sprinkle, "The Rationale of the Laws of Clean and Unclean In
    Joe M. Sprinkle, “The Rationale Of The Laws Of Clean And Unclean In The Old Testament,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 43.4 (2000): 637-657. The Rationale Of The Laws Of Clean And Unclean In The Old Testament — Joe M. Sprinkle a Ritual cleanness and uncleanness (associated with the Heb. roots t£a„h and t£a„m) represents a major theme of the Pentateuch. Purity rules describe the rituals, varying according to the “severity” of the impurity contracted, for ceremonial uncleanness due to skin disease, bodily discharges, touching unclean things, and eating unclean foods. The rationale for these laws is never clearly spelled out, but several explanations probably have some validity, including hygiene, the need to dissociate oneself from disgusting or pagan things, various other ethical lessons, the association of Yahweh with life and wholeness rather than death or disorder, the separation of worship from expressions of sexuality, and the need for Israel to be separated from the Gentiles. However, this paper argues that the most important message conveyed by these laws is that God is holy, and man, conversely, is contaminated and unfit, in and of himself, to approach a holy God. All this, in turn, served to inculcate in the mind of the ancient Israelite the sacredness of the tabernacle/temple space within the conceptual “cultic topography” produced by the clean and unclean system. I. How Uncleanness Was Contracted According to the laws of the Pentateuch, the Israelite was to regard most things as “clean,” but a person or thing could contract uncleanness in a variety of ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean and Unclean Meats?
    THIS PUBLICATION IS NOT TO BE SOLD. It is a free educational service in the public interest, published by the United Church of God, an International Association. page 1 What Does the Bible Teach About Clean and Unclean Meats? © 2001, 2008 United Church of God, an International Association All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. Scriptures in this publication are quoted from the New King James Version (© 1988 Thomas Nelson, Inc., publishers) unless otherwise noted. 2 What Does the Bible Teach About Clean and Unclean Meats? Clean and Unclean Meats: Does God’s Word Draw a Distinction? 3 these distinctions no longer apply. But, rather than relying on human Clean and Unclean opinion, let’s consider these matters in the light of the Bible. Popular ideas about distinctions Meats: Does God’s Word Since many people enjoy eating pork (ham, bacon, sausage, etc.) and experience no immediate adverse effects, some have looked for scientific reasons that God may have had in mind when He told the ancient Israelites Draw a Distinction? not to eat pork (Leviticus 11:7; Deuteronomy 14:8). One theory is that God Many people have misconceptions about the biblical forbade the eating of pork so that the Israelites would not catch certain teaching on clean and unclean meats. What does diseases, such as trichinosis, that pigs can carry. After all, the Israelites Scripture really reveal on this subject? did not own refrigerators, and researchers had not yet warned people to thoroughly cook pork to kill any potential disease-carrying organisms. od gave all of His laws for good reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Unclean Animals in Ancient Israel: an Ecological Perspective
    Philosophy Study, ISSN 2159-5313 January 2014, Vol. 4, No. 1, 68-75 D DAVID PUBLISHING Caring for Unclean Animals in Ancient Israel: An Ecological Perspective Daniel Berchie Valley View University In view of the biblical kosher law of clean and unclean animals, the question of whether unclean animals could be reared or not in Ancient Israel becomes an ecological concern (Lev. 7:21; 11:26) for religious bodies today who still consider certain animals as unclean. A theological study of the law in the Pentateuch suggests that, in Ancient Israel, unclean animals were well catered for. Physical contact with live unclean animals did not render one unclean. Rather, uncleanness could be acquired through the touching of the carcass of clean or unclean animals (11:24-28, 38-39). As part of their stewardship ordained by God (Gen. 1:26), the people of Israel touched and reared/cared for unclean animals. Amongst other things, analysis of Gen. 1:26, in the Hebrew text, indicates that the primary purpose of human creation, as cosmic stewards over all creatures (including unclean animals), is underlined. Hence, contemporary religious bodies, who still consider certain animals as unclean, should have an unfeigned care and positive attitude towards all unclean animals. Keywords: unclean animals, Stewards, socio-ecological, kosher (“kashrut”), theo-Ecocentric, Ancient Israel 1. Introduction Over the last two decades, both Jewish and Christian environmental ethicists and ecologists have challenged the anthropocentric view imposed by critics on biblical data (White 1976; Rockefeller and Elder 1992; Nash 1996; Bernstein 1998; Hiers 1996-1998). This criticism may have occasioned the Jewish environmental movement, whose objective is to showcase how ecological Jewish religion is (Katz 1994; Schwartz 1995; Tirosh-Samuelson 2001) and how its beliefs have been consistent with environmental protection (Tirosh-Samuelson 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Representations of Anti-Semitism in English and Northern French Medieval Bestiaries
    Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Projects Spring 5-1-2012 The Regional Impact on Medieval Text and Image: Exploring Representations of Anti-Semitism in English and Northern French Medieval Bestiaries Sarah Elizabeth Spencer Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone Part of the European History Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Spencer, Sarah Elizabeth, "The Regional Impact on Medieval Text and Image: Exploring Representations of Anti-Semitism in English and Northern French Medieval Bestiaries" (2012). Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. 193. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/193 This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Regional Impact on Medieval Text and Image: Exploring Representations of Anti-Semitism in English and Northern French Medieval Bestiaries A Capstone Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Renée Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University Sarah Elizabeth Spencer Candidate for B.A. in History and B.S. in Physics and Renée Crown University Honors May 2012 Honors Capstone Project in History Capstone Project Advisor: _______________________ Professor Samantha Herrick Capstone Project Reader: _______________________ Professor Dennis Romano Honors Director: _______________________ Stephen Kuusisto, Director Date: April 25, 2012 i Abstract This thesis endeavors to explain the variations in representations of anti-Semitism between medieval bestiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Pig Taboos in the Ancient Near East
    Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale School of Ministry and Theology (Avondale Theology Papers and Journal Articles Seminary) 11-2014 Pig Taboos in the Ancient near East Koot van Wyk Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/theo_papers Part of the Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation van Wyk, K. (2014). Pig taboos in the ancient near east. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(13), 111-134. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Ministry and Theology (Avondale Seminary) at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theology Papers and Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4, No. 13; November 2014 Pig Taboos in the Ancient near East Koot van Wyk* Abstract The cardinal study on the topic of pig eating in the Ancient Near East, is the work of Billie Jean Collins (2006). She focused basically on the issue as it relates to the Hittite cuneiform texts but did also probe sideways to other nations and the Bible, albeit minor comments. This study wishes to stand on the shoulders of Collins, adjusting some statements, adding other aspects from Archaeological sites and Gerhard Hasel’s explanation of Clean and Unclean in Leviticus 11. What was found in this presentation, is that chronology as backbone in the Scriptures, if taken seriously, could explain the presence or absence of pig eating practices also among the Hittites and Egyptians (the New Kingdom).
    [Show full text]
  • *613" Tem and P the Commands ¡N 20
    *613" Tem and P The commands ¡n 20. Build the holy sanctuary of yahweh. (Exodus the Five Books of Moses 25:8-9) The number 613 ís first mentioned 21. Reverence Yahweh in the sanctuary of by Rabbi Simlai in the 3.d century A.D. Yahweh. (Leviticus 19:30) Mokkot23bl. [Talmud 22. Guard the sanctuary of yahweh at all tímes. The list presented below is based on the list of (Numbers t8:2,4) Rabbi Maimonides, l2 century A.D. 23.The priests and Levites shall do their appointed work in the sanctuary of yahweh. Bold underlined = in the Decalog (Exodus 20:1-1g) (Numbers LB:23,6-7) Bold = in the Book of the Covenant 24.The priests must wash their hands and feet, (Exodus 2O:t9-23:33 (Exodus 3O:L7-2I) 25. The priests must light the seven lamp lampstand. (Exodus 27 :2O-2L) 26. The priests must bless the people with the Name of Yahweh. (Numbers 6:23-27) 27.The priests must set the showbread and 248 Positive mitzvot frankincense before the ark. (Exodus 25:30) (cornmandments) 28.The priests must burn the incense on the golden altar in the morning and between the eveníngs. (Exodus 30: 7-8) Worsh of 29.The priests must keep the fire burning on the altar continuously. (Leviticus 6:12-13) 1. 30. The priests must remove the ashes from the altar daily. (Leviticus 6:10-11) z. submir to yahweh as the Áñi:å'"''ï31, ,o 31. The priests must keep the ritually unclean be in unity with Yahweh.
    [Show full text]
  • Beware of Dogs! the Position and Role of Dogs in Biblical Discourse
    D. Berković: Beware of dogs! The position and role of dogs in biblical discourse Beware of dogs! The position and role of dogs in biblical discourse Daniel Berković Biblijski institut, Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] UDK:27-1:2-67 Original scientific paper Received: February, 2014 Accepted: April, 2014 Summary One way or another, animal and humans beings are closely connected, whether in harmony, or conflict. Animals are our friends and helpers, but may also become our food. In the history of religion, animals as sacrificial offerings have been the means of mediation between people and God. In bib- lical discourse, the relationship between people and animals is depicted either in terms of human superiority over the animal world, “so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground,” (Gen 1:26-30) or as a relationship of mutual fear, “The fear and dread of you will fall on all the beasts of the earth, and on all the birds in the sky, on every crea- ture that moves along the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; they are given into your hands” (Gen 9:2). Finally, animal are food for humans, “Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything” (Gen 9:3). Key words: animals, livestock, dog, zoonymy, anthroponym, bestiary, zoola- try, spirit guide The biblical bestiary The biblical bestiary is more a zoo than a farm.
    [Show full text]