DOCSLIB.ORG

Second Quantization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Second Quantization Physics 127c: Statistical Mechanics Second Quantization Ladder Operators in the SHO It is useful to first review the use of ladder operators in the simple harmonic oscillator. Here I present the bare bones—review your favorite Quantum textbook for more details. The Hamiltonian for the SHO is 1 1 H = p2 + Kx2. (1) 2m 2 For this section only, I will scale variables so that m = 1,K = 1,and also h¯ = 1, to save writing. So the Hamiltonian is 1 1 H = p + x2 (2) 2 2 and using p =−i∂/∂x (remember h¯ = 1) Schrodinger’s equation Hψ = Eψ gives eigenstates ψn and energy eigenvalues εn d2 1 1 2 − ψn(x) + x ψn(x) = εnψ(x). (3) 2 dx2 2 This differential equation can be solved with all the technology of orthogonal polynomials to find the eigen- 1 εn = n + values 2 , etc. We can instead solve the problem algebraically by introducing up and down ladder operators b+ and b 1 b = √ (p − ix) (4) 2 1 b+ = (b)+ = √ (p + ix) (5) 2 where the + superscript denotes the Hermitian conjugate. We know that the commutator [x,p] ≡ [xp − px] = i (6) is equivalent to the coordinate representation p →−i∂/∂x, and so it is natural to look at the commutation properties of b, b+: 1 [b, b+] = [p − ix,p + ix] (7) 2 =−i[x,p] = 1. (8) The Hamiltonian is 1 H = b+b + , (9) 2 and we are led to look at [b, b+b] = bb+b − b+bb (10) = [b, b+]b = b, (11) and [b+,b+b] = b+b+b − b+bb+ (12) =−b+[b, b+] =−b+. (13) 1 Collecting the results: [b, b+] = 1, (14a) [b, b+b] = b, (14b) [b+,b+b] =−b+. (14c) Since H is the sum of squares, the eigenvalues must be positive, and so there is lowest energy ε0 and corresponding normalized eigenfunction ψ0. Let’s consider the state bψ0, and ask how the Hamiltonian acts on this state using the commutation rules to transfer the action of H onto ψ0: 1 H(bψ ) = (b+b + )bψ (15) 0 2 0 1 = [b(b+b + ) − b]ψ (16) 2 0 = (ε0 − 1)(bψ0). (17) This suggests that bψ0 is an eigenfunction with energy ε0 − 1, but since ε0 was defined as the lowest energy this is not possible, and the only way out is bψ0 = 0. (18) Thus the ground state eigenfunction is defined by the action of the down ladder operator b giving zero. Similarly + + H(b ψ0) = (ε0 + 1)(b ψ0) (19) + so that b ψ0 is an eigenfunction with energy ε0 + 1. Continuing in this way we find a “ladder” of eigenstates + n 1 ψn = (b ) ψ with energy εn = n + . (20) 0 2 We can argue that this generates the complete set of states, etc., etc. (see your Quantum text book). Note that + b bψn = nψn (21) so the operator b+b acts as a level counter. We have not addressed the normalization of the ψn created in this way. The normalization of the ψn can be related: + + hψn|ψni = ψn−1|bb |ψn−1 = ψn−1|b b + 1|ψn−1 = n hψn−1|ψn−1i . (22) Since ψ0 is normalized, this gives hψn|ψni = n!. Then the functions −1/2 un = (n!) ψn (23) are normalized eigenfunctions, hun|uni = 1. Rewriting the effect of the ladder operators on ψn in terms of the normalized states un gives √ + b un = n + 1un+ (24) √ 1 bun = nun−1 (25) + b bun = nun. (26) Remembering that the level n can be thought of as n bosons in the single particle state of energy 1 we therefore have the following dictionary. We have introduced a raising operator or boson creation operator b+, and a lowering operator or boson annihilation operator b. The operator b+b = n counts the level or the 2 number of bosons. The Hamiltonian is just b+b plus a constant. (Going back to unscaled units, it would be b+b times the harmonic oscillator energy hω¯ , plus a constant.) The lowering or annihilation operator gives zero when acting on the lowest or zero particle state. The analysis in terms of ode theory has been replaced by an analysis in terms of the algebra of the b, b+ operators, a considerable simplification. Other expectation values can also be calculated e.g. 1 u |x2|u =− u |(b+ − b)(b+ − b)|u (27) 0 0 2 0 0 1 =− u |(b+b+ − b+b − bb+ + bb|u (28) 2 0 0 1 1 = u |(bb+|u = (29) 2 0 0 2 + where b |u0i = 0 = hu0| b has been used. Again this is considerably easier than integrating over the Gaussian form of u0(x). Many Particle Systems Occupation number representation For a many particle system we choose as the basis any symmetrized (bosons) or antisymmetrized (fermions) product of complete orthonormal set of single particle states φi. Often these will be chosen as momentum states, position states, or eigenstates of the noninteracting Hamiltonian. Bosons: The N particle basis state is X ψ (rE , rE ...rE ) = C φ (P rE )φ (P rE )...φ (P rE )...φ (P rE ) B 1 2 N 1 1 1 2 1 n1 Q N (30) P where φq ,q = 1 ...Q occurs nq times (“nq particles in the state φq ”). The sum runs over N! permutations P and the normalization constant is −1/2 C = (N!n1!n2! ...nQ!) . (31) Last term we introduced the occupation number representation where this state is represented ψB = n1n2 ...nQ ... (32) + where all the nq are zero for the empty states q>Q. We define boson creation operator bq and annihilation operator bq that adds or subtracts one particle from the single particle state φq + 1/2 b n n ...nq ...nQ = (nq + 1) n n ...(nq + 1)...nQ , (33a) q 1 2 1 2 1/2 bq n1n2 ...nq ...nQ = (nq ) n1n2 ...(nq − 1)...nQ . (33b) The prefactors are motivated by the ladder-operator results, and can be checked to preserve the nor- malization. Of course if nq = 0, the second result is just zero, consistent with the action of b on a zero particle state. It is easy to check that b, b+ satisfy + [br ,bs ] = δrs, (34) + + [br ,bs] = [br ,bs ] = 0. (35) 3 Fermions The antisymmetrized Fermi basis state is the Slater determinant X P ψF (rE1, rE2 ...rEN ) = C (−1) φ1(P rE1)φ2(P rE2)...φN (P rEN ) (36) P where now all the φi have to be different for a nonzero wave function (equivalent to the Pauli exclusion principle). The normalization constant is C = (N!)−1/2. (37) The occupation number representation is ψF = |n1n2 ...i (38) where each ni is one if the state appears in the Slater determinant and zero otherwise. Note that the order of the states affects the overall sign through the (−1)P , so we must have some convention for ordering the list of one particle states. What are the appropriate creation and annihilation operators? First consider the single particle state. Possible occupation numbers are 0, 1, i.e. the states |0i and |1i. Define creation operator a+ and annihilation operator a such that a+ |0i = |1i a+ |1i = 0 (39) a |0i = 0 a |1i = |0i . (Take care of the difference between 0 and |0i.) It is easy to check that a,a+ satisfy anticommutation rules a,a+ = 1 (40a) {a,a} = 0 = a+,a+ (40b) where {A, B} = AB + BA. (41) For a multiparticle system S (−1) |n1n2 ...0s ...i if ns = 1 as |n1n2 ...ns ...i = (42a) 0ifns = 0 + 0ifns = 1 as |n1n2 ...ns ...i = S (42b) (−1) |n1n2 ...1s ...i if ns = 0 where S = n1 + n2 +···ns−1 (43) is to keep track of the ordering convention. The full algebra is then a ,a+ = δ , r s rs (44a) + + {ar ,as} = 0 = ar ,as . (44b) Note, for example that a+a+ | , ,...i =−a+a+ | , ,...i 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 (45) consistent with the definition in terms of Slater determinants. 4 In either case the number operator that counts the number of particles is the same + bs bs BOSONS ns = + (46) as as FERMIONS and has eigenvalues corresponding to the possible occupation numbers of the state s (0, 1 for Fermions, 0, 1,...for Bosons). It follows from the commutation or anticommutation rules that in either case [ns,nr ] = 0 (47) so that the set {nr } are simultaneously diagonalizable, as we expect from the definition of occupation number states. A general many particle wave function ψ can be expressed as a linear combination of the occupation number basis states. The expectation value hψ |ns| ψi may then be nonintegral. We have replaced complicated symmetric product or determinant wave functions by states in the simpler occupation number representation, and have developed the algebra of operators connecting these states. Any occupation number state can be generated by acting on the no-particle state |0i (the “vacuum state”) with appropriate combinations of creation operators c+. This notation is called “second quantization” as opposed to the original “first quantization” notation. It is the notation of quantum field theory. The next task is to write physical operators in terms of these elementary operators. Physical Operators We are usually interested in few-body operators, i.e. those involving a fewP particle coordinates in the T =−h2 ∇2 “usual”P first quantization notation, such as the kinetic energy 2m i i or the potential energy V = u(rE −Er ) i<j i j . P For a one body operator O1 = fi the second quantized expression is X + O1 = hφr |f | φsi cr cs (48) r,s where hφr |f | φsi is the matrix element Z 3 ∗ hφr |f | φsi = d rφr (r)f(E r)φE s(r)E (49) and c represents a for Fermions andPb for Bosons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Winter 12-15-2016 The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime Li Chen Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Recommended Citation Chen, Li, "The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime" (2016). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 985. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/985 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Physics Dissertation Examination Committee: Alexander Seidel, Chair Zohar Nussinov Michael Ogilvie Xiang Tang Li Yang The Second Quantized Approach to the Study of Model Hamiltonians in Quantum Hall Regime by Li Chen A dissertation presented to The Graduate School of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 Saint Louis, Missouri c 2016, Li Chen ii Contents List of Figures v Acknowledgements vii Abstract viii 1 Introduction to Quantum Hall Effect 1 1.1 The classical Hall effect . .1 1.2 The integer quantum Hall effect . .3 1.3 The fractional quantum Hall effect . .7 1.4 Theoretical explanations of the fractional quantum Hall effect . .9 1.5 Laughlin's gedanken experiment .
    [Show full text]
  • Canonical Quantization of Two-Dimensional Gravity S
    Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1–16. Translated from Zhurnal Éksperimental’noœ i Teoreticheskoœ Fiziki, Vol. 117, No. 1, 2000, pp. 5–21. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2000 by Vergeles. GRAVITATION, ASTROPHYSICS Canonical Quantization of Two-Dimensional Gravity S. N. Vergeles Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, 142432 Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Received March 23, 1999 Abstract—A canonical quantization of two-dimensional gravity minimally coupled to real scalar and spinor Majorana fields is presented. The physical state space of the theory is completely described and calculations are also made of the average values of the metric tensor relative to states close to the ground state. © 2000 MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica”. 1. INTRODUCTION quantization) for observables in the highest orders, will The quantum theory of gravity in four-dimensional serve as a criterion for the correctness of the selected space–time encounters fundamental difficulties which quantization route. have not yet been surmounted. These difficulties can be The progress achieved in the construction of a two- arbitrarily divided into conceptual and computational. dimensional quantum theory of gravity is associated The main conceptual problem is that the Hamiltonian is with two ideas. These ideas will be formulated below a linear combination of first-class constraints. This fact after the necessary notation has been introduced. makes the role of time in gravity unclear. The main computational problem is the nonrenormalizability of We shall postulate that space–time is topologically gravity theory. These difficulties are closely inter- equivalent to a two-dimensional cylinder.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: Renormalization of the Massive Thirring Model
    Instituto de Física Teórica IFT Universidade Estadual Paulista October/92 IFT-R043/92 Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: Renormalization of the Massive Thirring Model J.C.Brunelli Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405-900 - São Paulo, S.P. Brazil 'This work was supported by CNPq. Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405 - Sao Paulo, S.P. Brazil Telephone: 55 (11) 288-5643 Telefax: 55(11)36-3449 Telex: 55 (11) 31870 UJMFBR Electronic Address: [email protected] 47553::LIBRARY Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: 1. Introduction Renormalization of the Massive Thimng Model' The stochastic quantization method of Parisi-Wu1 (for a review see Ref. 2) when applied to fermionic theories usually requires the use of a Langevin system modified by the introduction of a kernel3 J. C. Brunelli (1.1a) InBtituto de Física Teórica (1.16) Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405 - São Paulo - SP where BRAZIL l = 2Kah(x,x )8(t - ?). (1.2) Here tj)1 tp and the Gaussian noises rj, rj are independent Grassmann variables. K(xty) is the aforementioned kernel which ensures the proper equilibrium limit configuration for Accepted for publication in the International Journal of Modern Physics A. mas si ess theories. The specific form of the kernel is quite arbitrary but in what follows, we use K(x,y) = Sn(x-y)(-iX + ™)- Abstract In a number of cases, it has been verified that the stochastic quantization procedure does not bring new anomalies and that the equilibrium limit correctly reproduces the basic (jJsfsini g the Langevin approach for stochastic processes we study the renormalizability properties of the models considered4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1512.08882V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 30 Dec 2015
    Topological Phases: Classification of Topological Insulators and Superconductors of Non-Interacting Fermions, and Beyond Andreas W. W. Ludwig Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA After briefly recalling the quantum entanglement-based view of Topological Phases of Matter in order to outline the general context, we give an overview of different approaches to the classification problem of Topological Insulators and Superconductors of non-interacting Fermions. In particular, we review in some detail general symmetry aspects of the "Ten-Fold Way" which forms the foun- dation of the classification, and put different approaches to the classification in relationship with each other. We end by briefly mentioning some of the results obtained on the effect of interactions, mainly in three spatial dimensions. I. INTRODUCTION Based on the theoretical and, shortly thereafter, experimental discovery of the Z2 Topological Insulators in d = 2 and d = 3 spatial dimensions dominated by spin-orbit interactions (see [1,2] for a review), the field of Topological Insulators and Superconductors has grown in the last decade into what is arguably one of the most interesting and stimulating developments in Condensed Matter Physics. The field is now developing at an ever increasing pace in a number of directions. While the understanding of fully interacting phases is still evolving, our understanding of Topological Insulators and Superconductors of non-interacting Fermions is now very well established and complete, and it serves as a stepping stone for further developments. Here we will provide an overview of different approaches to the classification problem of non-interacting Fermionic Topological Insulators and Superconductors, and exhibit connections between these approaches which address the problem from very different angles.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    Utrecht Lecture Notes Masters Program Theoretical Physics September 2006 INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY by B. de Wit Institute for Theoretical Physics Utrecht University Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Path integrals and quantum mechanics 5 3 The classical limit 10 4 Continuous systems 18 5 Field theory 23 6 Correlation functions 36 6.1 Harmonic oscillator correlation functions; operators . 37 6.2 Harmonic oscillator correlation functions; path integrals . 39 6.2.1 Evaluating G0 ............................... 41 6.2.2 The integral over qn ............................ 42 6.2.3 The integrals over q1 and q2 ....................... 43 6.3 Conclusion . 44 7 Euclidean Theory 46 8 Tunneling and instantons 55 8.1 The double-well potential . 57 8.2 The periodic potential . 66 9 Perturbation theory 71 10 More on Feynman diagrams 80 11 Fermionic harmonic oscillator states 87 12 Anticommuting c-numbers 90 13 Phase space with commuting and anticommuting coordinates and quanti- zation 96 14 Path integrals for fermions 108 15 Feynman diagrams for fermions 114 2 16 Regularization and renormalization 117 17 Further reading 127 3 1 Introduction Physical systems that involve an infinite number of degrees of freedom are usually described by some sort of field theory. Almost all systems in nature involve an extremely large number of degrees of freedom. A droplet of water contains of the order of 1026 molecules and while each water molecule can in many applications be described as a point particle, each molecule has itself a complicated structure which reveals itself at molecular length scales. To deal with this large number of degrees of freedom, which for all practical purposes is infinite, we often regard a system as continuous, in spite of the fact that, at certain distance scales, it is discrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Droplets in Dipolar Ring-Shaped Bose-Einstein Condensates
    UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE FACULTY OF PHYSICS MASTER THESIS Quantum Droplets in Dipolar Ring-shaped Bose-Einstein Condensates Author: Supervisor: Marija Šindik Dr. Antun Balaž September, 2020 UNIVERZITET U BEOGRADU FIZICKIˇ FAKULTET MASTER TEZA Kvantne kapljice u dipolnim prstenastim Boze-Ajnštajn kondenzatima Autor: Mentor: Marija Šindik Dr Antun Balaž Septembar, 2020. Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Antun Balaž, for his guidance, patience, useful suggestions and for the time and effort he invested in the making of this thesis. I would also like to thank my family and friends for the emotional support and encouragement. This thesis is written in the Scientific Computing Laboratory, Center for the Study of Complex Systems of the Institute of Physics Belgrade. Numerical simulations were run on the PARADOX supercomputing facility at the Scientific Computing Laboratory of the Institute of Physics Belgrade. iii Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 Chapter 2 – Theoretical description of ultracold Bose gases 3 2.1 Contact interaction..............................4 2.2 The Gross-Pitaevskii equation........................5 2.3 Dipole-dipole interaction...........................8 2.4 Beyond-mean-field approximation......................9 2.5 Quantum droplets............................... 13 Chapter 3 – Numerical methods 15 3.1 Rescaling of the effective GP equation................... 15 3.2 Split-step Crank-Nicolson method...................... 17 3.3 Calculation of the ground state....................... 20 3.4 Calculation of relevant physical quantities................. 21 Chapter 4 – Results 24 4.1 System parameters.............................. 24 4.2 Ground state................................. 25 4.3 Droplet formation............................... 26 4.4 Critical strength of the contact interaction................. 28 4.5 The number of droplets...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quantization
    Chapter 1 Second Quantization 1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quan- tum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator. Let a and a† be two operators acting on an abstract Hilbert space of states, and satisfying the commutation relation a,a† = 1 (1.1) where by “1” we mean the identity operator of this Hilbert space. The operators a and a† are not self-adjoint but are the adjoint of each other. Let α be a state which we will take to be an eigenvector of the Hermitian operators| ia†a with eigenvalue α which is a real number, a†a α = α α (1.2) | i | i Hence, α = α a†a α = a α 2 0 (1.3) h | | i k | ik ≥ where we used the fundamental axiom of Quantum Mechanics that the norm of all states in the physical Hilbert space is positive. As a result, the eigenvalues α of the eigenstates of a†a must be non-negative real numbers. Furthermore, since for all operators A, B and C [AB, C]= A [B, C] + [A, C] B (1.4) we get a†a,a = a (1.5) − † † † a a,a = a (1.6) 1 2 CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION i.e., a and a† are “eigen-operators” of a†a. Hence, a†a a = a a†a 1 (1.7) − † † † † a a a = a a a +1 (1.8) Consequently we find a†a a α = a a†a 1 α = (α 1) a α (1.9) | i − | i − | i Hence the state aα is an eigenstate of a†a with eigenvalue α 1, provided a α = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • General Quantization
    General quantization David Ritz Finkelstein∗ October 29, 2018 Abstract Segal’s hypothesis that physical theories drift toward simple groups follows from a general quantum principle and suggests a general quantization process. I general- quantize the scalar meson field in Minkowski space-time to illustrate the process. The result is a finite quantum field theory over a quantum space-time with higher symmetry than the singular theory. Multiple quantification connects the levels of the theory. 1 Quantization as regularization Quantum theory began with ad hoc regularization prescriptions of Planck and Bohr to fit the weird behavior of the electromagnetic field and the nuclear atom and to handle infinities that blocked earlier theories. In 1924 Heisenberg discovered that one small change in algebra did both naturally. In the early 1930’s he suggested extending his algebraic method to space-time, to regularize field theory, inspiring the pioneering quantum space-time of Snyder [43]. Dirac’s historic quantization program for gravity also eliminated absolute space-time points from the quantum theory of gravity, leading Bergmann too to say that the world point itself possesses no physical reality [5, 6]. arXiv:quant-ph/0601002v2 22 Jan 2006 For many the infinities that still haunt physics cry for further and deeper quanti- zation, but there has been little agreement on exactly what and how far to quantize. According to Segal canonical quantization continued a drift of physical theory toward simple groups that special relativization began. He proposed on Darwinian grounds that further quantization should lead to simple groups [32]. Vilela Mendes initiated the work in that direction [37].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Second Quantization 7.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators
    Chapter 7 Second Quantization Creation and annihilation operators. Occupation number. Anticommutation relations. Normal product. Wick's theorem. One-body operator in second quantization. Hartree- Fock potential. Two-particle Random Phase Approximation (RPA). Two-particle Tamm- Dankoff Approximation (TDA). 7.1 Creation and annihilation operators In Fig. 3 of the previous Chapter it is shown the single-particle levels generated by a double-magic core containing A nucleons. Below the Fermi level (FL) all states hi are occupied and one can not place a particle there. In other words, the A-particle state j0i, with all levels hi occupied, is the ground state of the inert (frozen) double magic core. Above the FL all states are empty and, therefore, a particle can be created in one of the levels denoted by pi in the Figure. In Second Quantization one introduces the y j i creation operator cpi such that the state pi in the nucleus containing A+1 nucleons can be written as, j i y j i pi = cpi 0 (7.1) this state has to be normalized, that is, h j i h j y j i h j j i pi pi = 0 cpi cpi 0 = 0 cpi pi = 1 (7.2) from where it follows that j0i = cpi jpii (7.3) and the operator cpi can be interpreted as the annihilation operator of a particle in the state jpii. This implies that the hole state hi in the (A-1)-nucleon system is jhii = chi j0i (7.4) Occupation number and anticommutation relations One notices that the number y nj = h0jcjcjj0i (7.5) is nj = 1 is j is a hole state and nj = 0 if j is a particle state.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.04416V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]
    Path integral and Sommerfeld quantization Mikoto Matsuda1, ∗ and Takehisa Fujita2, † 1Japan Health and Medical technological college, Tokyo, Japan 2College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan (Dated: September 13, 2018) The path integral formulation can reproduce the right energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator potential, but it cannot resolve the Coulomb potential problem. This is because the path integral cannot properly take into account the boundary condition, which is due to the presence of the scattering states in the Coulomb potential system. On the other hand, the Sommerfeld quantization can reproduce the right energy spectrum of both harmonic oscillator and Coulomb potential cases since the boundary condition is effectively taken into account in this semiclassical treatment. The basic difference between the two schemes should be that no constraint is imposed on the wave function in the path integral while the Sommerfeld quantization rule is derived by requiring that the state vector should be a single-valued function. The limitation of the semiclassical method is also clarified in terms of the square well and δ(x) function potential models. PACS numbers: 25.85.-w,25.85.Ec I. INTRODUCTION Quantum field theory is the basis of modern theoretical physics and it is well established by now [1–4]. If the kinematics is non-relativistic, then one obtains the equation of quantum mechanics which is the Schr¨odinger equation. In this respect, if one solves the Schr¨odinger equation, then one can properly obtain the energy eigenvalue of the corresponding potential model . Historically, however, the energy eigenvalue is obtained without solving the Schr¨odinger equation, and the most interesting method is known as the Sommerfeld quantization rule which is the semiclassical method [5–8].
    [Show full text]
  • Solitons and Quantum Behavior Abstract
    Solitons and Quantum Behavior Richard A. Pakula email: [email protected] April 9, 2017 Abstract In applied physics and in engineering intuitive understanding is a boost for creativity and almost a necessity for efficient product improvement. The existence of soliton solutions to the quantum equations in the presence of self-interactions allows us to draw an intuitive picture of quantum mechanics. The purpose of this work is to compile a collection of models, some of which are simple, some are obvious, some have already appeared in papers and even in textbooks, and some are new. However this is the first time they are presented (to our knowledge) in a common place attempting to provide an intuitive physical description for one of the basic particles in nature: the electron. The soliton model applied to the electrons can be extended to the electromagnetic field providing an unambiguous description for the photon. In so doing a clear image of quantum mechanics emerges, including quantum optics, QED and field quantization. To our belief this description is of highly pedagogical value. We start with a traditional description of the old quantum mechanics, first quantization and second quantization, showing the tendency to renounce to 'visualizability', as proposed by Heisenberg for the quantum theory. We describe an intuitive description of first and second quantization based on the concept of solitons, pioneered by the 'double solution' of de Broglie in 1927. Many aspects of first and second quantization are clarified and visualized intuitively, including the possible achievement of ergodicity by the so called ‘vacuum fluctuations’. PACS: 01.70.+w, +w, 03.65.Ge , 03.65.Pm, 03.65.Ta, 11.15.-q, 12.20.*, 14.60.Cd, 14.70.-e, 14.70.Bh, 14.70.Fm, 14.70.Hp, 14.80.Bn, 32.80.y, 42.50.Lc 1 Table of Contents Solitons and Quantum Behavior ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture Notes with Course Quantum Theory
    SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory Dr. P.J.H. Denteneer Fall 2008 2 SECOND QUANTIZATION x1. Introduction and history 3 x2. The N-boson system 4 x3. The many-boson system 5 x4. Identical spin-0 particles 8 x5. The N-fermion system 13 x6. The many-fermion system 14 1 x7. Identical spin- 2 particles 17 x8. Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions 19 Second Quantization 1. Introduction and history Second quantization is the standard formulation of quantum many-particle theory. It is important for use both in Quantum Field Theory (because a quantized field is a qm op- erator with many degrees of freedom) and in (Quantum) Condensed Matter Theory (since matter involves many particles). Identical (= indistinguishable) particles −! state of two particles must either be symmetric or anti-symmetric under exchange of the particles. 1 ja ⊗ biB = p (ja1 ⊗ b2i + ja2 ⊗ b1i) bosons; symmetric (1a) 2 1 ja ⊗ biF = p (ja1 ⊗ b2i − ja2 ⊗ b1i) fermions; anti − symmetric (1b) 2 Motivation: why do we need the \second quantization formalism"? (a) for practical reasons: computing matrix elements between N-particle symmetrized wave functions involves (N!)2 terms (integrals); see the symmetrized states below. (b) it will be extremely useful to have a formalism that can handle a non-fixed particle number N, as in the grand-canonical ensemble in Statistical Physics; especially if you want to describe processes in which particles are created and annihilated (as in typical high-energy physics accelerator experiments). So: both for Condensed Matter and High-Energy Physics this formalism is crucial! (c) To describe interactions the formalism to be introduced will be vastly superior to the wave-function- and Hilbert-space-descriptions.
    [Show full text]