DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Lecture 3. Second Quantization, Bosons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Lecture 3. Second Quantization, Bosons Manyb o dy phenomena in condensed matter and atomic physics Last modied September Lecture Second Quantization Bosons In this lecture we discuss second quantization a formalism that is commonly used to analyze manyb o dy problems The key ideas of this metho d were develop ed starting from the initial work of Dirac most notably by Fo ck and Jordan In this approach one thinks of multiparticle states of b osons or fermions as single particle states each lled with a certain numb er of identical particles The language of second quantization often allows to reduce the manybo dy problem to a single particle problem dened in terms of quasiparticles ie particles dressed by interactions The Fo ck space The manyb o dy problem is dened for N particles here b osons describ ed by the sum of singleparticle Hamiltonians and the twob o dy interaction Hamiltonian N X X (1) (2) H H x H x x b a a a�1 a6�b 2 h (1) (2) 0 (2) 0 2 H x H x x U x x U x r x m where x are particle co ordinates In some rare cases eg for nuclear particles one a also has to include the threeparticle and higher order multiparticle interactions such as P (3) H x x x etc a b c abc The system is describ ed by the manyb o dy wavefunction x x x symmetric 2 1 N with resp ect to the p ermutations of co ordinates x The symmetry requirement fol a lows from pareticles indestinguishability and Bose statistics ie the wav efunction invari ance under p ermutations of the particles The wavefunction x x x ob eys the 2 1 N h H Since the numb er of particles in typical situations of Schrodinger equation i t interest is extremely large solving this equation directly presents a very hard problem There are several approaches however that allow to gain insight The metho d of sec ond quatization historically the rst manybo dy technique develop ed in the s will b e discussed here We shall start with dening the Fo ck space sometimes also called the big many particle space N o n M O (1) V V sy mm N (1) the sum of the N th symmetric p owers of the single particle Hilb ert space V It describ es the states of a system containing any numb er of particles N One can cho ose the basis in the big space V in the form of symmetrized pro ducts of single particle wavefunctions x drawn from an orthonormal complete set of states in p (1) V 12 X m m 1 2 x x x x x x m 1 2 N m p 1 p 2 p N 1 2 1 2 N N P with the sum taken over all p ermutations of the states x The numb ers m indicate p p how many times the function x app ears in the pro duct The numb er of p ermutations p P in the sum is equal to the numb er of ways to combine N elements into groups containg P m m etc elements each m m N This combinatorial factor equal to 1 2 1 2 N m m denes the normalization factor in Eq One can check that the states 1 2 are orthogonal and form a complete set in V As an example consider free Bose particles in a b ox L L L in which case the single particle states can b e chosen as eigenstates of the single particle problem E x 2 h� 2 r Assuming p erio dic b oundary conditions we have eigenstates of a plane wave 2m form p r exp ik r k n n n n n n n n 1 2 3 L V 2 �h 3 2 with integer n and V L The energies of these states are E k The space V 123 n n 2m is then spanned by the functions 0 0 0 p r r r r r r r n n m m n n n corresp onding to the noparticle state one particle two particles etc The energies of these states are E E E E n n m n Note that the structure of the twoparticle functions dep ends on whether the participating singleparticle states are dierent or the same To make progress one can intro duce the socalled numb er representation Allow any total particle numb er N and fo cus on the dep endence of the state on the occupation numbers m This dep endence is captured most vividly by the representation in which an i auxiliary oscillator along with the creation and annihilation op erators is asso ciated with each single particle state The o ccupation numb ers are interpreted in this representation as numb er of quanta in eachy oscillator The corresp oning Fock states in the numb er representation have the form 1 Y m i + p jm m i a ji 1 2 i m i i�1 P where ji is the noparticle state and m N This representation accounts correctly i for the symmetry prop erties of the states due to Bose statistics Secondquantized op erators In the numb er representation the manyb o dy Hamiltonian is represented by a p oly + nomial in the op erators a a i i X X (1) ij + (2) + + H H a a H a a a a j k m ij i k m i j ij ij k m (1) (2) ij with the quantities H H b eing the one and twoparticle matrix elements ij k m Z (1) (1) (1) H h xjH xj xi xH x xdx i j i j ij Z Z ij (2) 0 (2) 0 0 0 (2) 0 0 0 H h x x jH x x j x x i x x H x x x x dxdx i j k m i j k m k m One can prove the equivalence of this representation to the original manyb o dy problem formulated in terms of manyparticle wavefunction x x x by directly evalu 2 1 N ating the matric elements of the Hamiltonian b etween all pairs of many b o dy states and showing that in b oth representations the results agree The combinatorics involved in this pro of is comb ersom alb eit completely straightforward Instead of reviewing it here we refer to the b o ok by J R Schrieer The Theory of Sup erconductivity that contains an App endix describing the analysis in some detail Another pro of can b e devised using functional integral and we shall talk ab out it later on The expressions are true for any orthogonal set of functions x In the case i when these functions are chosen to b e the eigenstates of the singleparticle problem the (1) vanish b etween dierent states matrix elements of H (1) h xjH xj xi E i j i ij and the oneparticle part of the Hamiltonian simplies to X (1) + H E a a i i i i + Since n a a is nothing but the numb er op erator the eigenvalues of the oneparticle i i i Hamiltonian corresp onding to the numb er states are X (1) hn n jH E jn n i E n n 1 2 n 1 2 i i 1 2 i In the ab ove example of free b osons in a b ox the states are lab eled by discrete momenta and the expression b ecomes X E n E n k k n 1 2 k (2) 0 If the b osons are in U r r from Eqs teracting via a twobo dy p otential U we obtain the twoparticle Hamiltonian of the form X (2) (2) + + H hk k jU jk k ia a a a k k 1 2 3 4 3 4 k k 1 2 k k k k 1 2 3 4 where the matrix element in evaluated on the plane wave states has the form Z Z 0 0 (2) ;ik r;ik r +ik r+ik r 0 3 3 0 1 2 3 4 hk k jU jk k i e U r rd r d r 1 2 3 4 2 V 0 This expression can b e simplied and evaluated by choosing a r r as an integration 0 variable instead of r after which the integral in factors as Z Z i(k ;k )a 3 ;ik r;i r+ik r+ik r 3 k 4 2 1 2 3 4 e U ad a e d r U k k +k �k +k 2 4 k 1 2 3 4 R ;ikr 3 where U k e U rd r is the Fourier transform of the interaction p otential and V k k k k 1 2 3 4 +k �k +k k 1 2 3 4 k k k k 1 2 3 4 Finally the twobo dy Hamiltonian takes the form X (2) + + H U k k a a a a 2 4 k k 3 4 k k 1 2 V +k �k +k k 1 2 3 4 where the sum is taken over all integers parameterizing the plane wave states sub ject to the constraint k k k k This constraint as it is clear from the calculation arises 1 2 3 4 due to translational invariance of the system Physically it expresses the conservation of momentum in two particle scattering The secondquantized interaction Hamiltonian is written in terms of the op erators a k + a which remove or add particles One may thus b e worried by apparent particle non k conservation After lo oking at it closer however and taking into account the commutation + + with the numb er op erator n a a relations of a a + + na an na a n P + one can show that the total number of particles N a a commutes with the Hamil k k k tonian and is thus conserved Field op erator A very useful representation of the secondquantized manybo dy hamiltonian is provided by the eld operator rst introduced by Jordan X X + + x a x x a x k k k k k k where x lab els conguration space eg x r in D The states x in Eq can k b e the eigenstates of a singleparticle problem such as eg the plane waves of the ab ove section or any other convenient orthonormal basis set The op erators ob ey commutation relations 0 + + 0 + 0 0 x x x x x x x x + which can b e proven by using the commutation relations of a and a along with the k k orthogonality of the states x For example k X X + 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 x x x x a a x x 0 k k k k k kk k 0 0 kk kk X 0 0 x x x x k k k We note that although some particular basis set x was employed to contruct the k eld op erators their prop erties such as the commutation relations are invariant with resp ect to the choice of basis Using the eld op erators the secondquantized problem can b e expressed as a p olynomial Z Z Z 2 h + 2 + + 0 0 0 0 H x r U x xdx x x U x x xx dxdx x m in which the quadratic and the quartic parts describ e noninteracting particles and their interaction resp ectively It is sometimes helpful to think of x as a quantized wavefunction In the eld op erator representation the many b o dy problem starts lo oking very much like a single particle problem Of course this simplicity is only apparent since we still have a quartic term in the Hamiltonian expressing the interactions and leading to nonlinear dynamics Not just the Hamiltonian but many other quantities also take a simple form in terms P of the eld op erator For example particle density nx x x b ecomes a a X 0 0 0 + + h x j x x j x ia a xx n x i j j i ij R 0 0 0 0 due to x x x x dx x x Similarly the particle current op erator is i j i j h + + j x xr x r x x x x mi The density and current ob ey continuity relation written as an op erator equation n rj t .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: Renormalization of the Massive Thirring Model
    Instituto de Física Teórica IFT Universidade Estadual Paulista October/92 IFT-R043/92 Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: Renormalization of the Massive Thirring Model J.C.Brunelli Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405-900 - São Paulo, S.P. Brazil 'This work was supported by CNPq. Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405 - Sao Paulo, S.P. Brazil Telephone: 55 (11) 288-5643 Telefax: 55(11)36-3449 Telex: 55 (11) 31870 UJMFBR Electronic Address: [email protected] 47553::LIBRARY Stochastic Quantization of Fermionic Theories: 1. Introduction Renormalization of the Massive Thimng Model' The stochastic quantization method of Parisi-Wu1 (for a review see Ref. 2) when applied to fermionic theories usually requires the use of a Langevin system modified by the introduction of a kernel3 J. C. Brunelli (1.1a) InBtituto de Física Teórica (1.16) Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona, 145 01405 - São Paulo - SP where BRAZIL l = 2Kah(x,x )8(t - ?). (1.2) Here tj)1 tp and the Gaussian noises rj, rj are independent Grassmann variables. K(xty) is the aforementioned kernel which ensures the proper equilibrium limit configuration for Accepted for publication in the International Journal of Modern Physics A. mas si ess theories. The specific form of the kernel is quite arbitrary but in what follows, we use K(x,y) = Sn(x-y)(-iX + ™)- Abstract In a number of cases, it has been verified that the stochastic quantization procedure does not bring new anomalies and that the equilibrium limit correctly reproduces the basic (jJsfsini g the Langevin approach for stochastic processes we study the renormalizability properties of the models considered4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1512.08882V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 30 Dec 2015
    Topological Phases: Classification of Topological Insulators and Superconductors of Non-Interacting Fermions, and Beyond Andreas W. W. Ludwig Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA After briefly recalling the quantum entanglement-based view of Topological Phases of Matter in order to outline the general context, we give an overview of different approaches to the classification problem of Topological Insulators and Superconductors of non-interacting Fermions. In particular, we review in some detail general symmetry aspects of the "Ten-Fold Way" which forms the foun- dation of the classification, and put different approaches to the classification in relationship with each other. We end by briefly mentioning some of the results obtained on the effect of interactions, mainly in three spatial dimensions. I. INTRODUCTION Based on the theoretical and, shortly thereafter, experimental discovery of the Z2 Topological Insulators in d = 2 and d = 3 spatial dimensions dominated by spin-orbit interactions (see [1,2] for a review), the field of Topological Insulators and Superconductors has grown in the last decade into what is arguably one of the most interesting and stimulating developments in Condensed Matter Physics. The field is now developing at an ever increasing pace in a number of directions. While the understanding of fully interacting phases is still evolving, our understanding of Topological Insulators and Superconductors of non-interacting Fermions is now very well established and complete, and it serves as a stepping stone for further developments. Here we will provide an overview of different approaches to the classification problem of non-interacting Fermionic Topological Insulators and Superconductors, and exhibit connections between these approaches which address the problem from very different angles.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quantization
    Chapter 1 Second Quantization 1.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators in Quan- tum Mechanics We will begin with a quick review of creation and annihilation operators in the non-relativistic linear harmonic oscillator. Let a and a† be two operators acting on an abstract Hilbert space of states, and satisfying the commutation relation a,a† = 1 (1.1) where by “1” we mean the identity operator of this Hilbert space. The operators a and a† are not self-adjoint but are the adjoint of each other. Let α be a state which we will take to be an eigenvector of the Hermitian operators| ia†a with eigenvalue α which is a real number, a†a α = α α (1.2) | i | i Hence, α = α a†a α = a α 2 0 (1.3) h | | i k | ik ≥ where we used the fundamental axiom of Quantum Mechanics that the norm of all states in the physical Hilbert space is positive. As a result, the eigenvalues α of the eigenstates of a†a must be non-negative real numbers. Furthermore, since for all operators A, B and C [AB, C]= A [B, C] + [A, C] B (1.4) we get a†a,a = a (1.5) − † † † a a,a = a (1.6) 1 2 CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION i.e., a and a† are “eigen-operators” of a†a. Hence, a†a a = a a†a 1 (1.7) − † † † † a a a = a a a +1 (1.8) Consequently we find a†a a α = a a†a 1 α = (α 1) a α (1.9) | i − | i − | i Hence the state aα is an eigenstate of a†a with eigenvalue α 1, provided a α = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • General Quantization
    General quantization David Ritz Finkelstein∗ October 29, 2018 Abstract Segal’s hypothesis that physical theories drift toward simple groups follows from a general quantum principle and suggests a general quantization process. I general- quantize the scalar meson field in Minkowski space-time to illustrate the process. The result is a finite quantum field theory over a quantum space-time with higher symmetry than the singular theory. Multiple quantification connects the levels of the theory. 1 Quantization as regularization Quantum theory began with ad hoc regularization prescriptions of Planck and Bohr to fit the weird behavior of the electromagnetic field and the nuclear atom and to handle infinities that blocked earlier theories. In 1924 Heisenberg discovered that one small change in algebra did both naturally. In the early 1930’s he suggested extending his algebraic method to space-time, to regularize field theory, inspiring the pioneering quantum space-time of Snyder [43]. Dirac’s historic quantization program for gravity also eliminated absolute space-time points from the quantum theory of gravity, leading Bergmann too to say that the world point itself possesses no physical reality [5, 6]. arXiv:quant-ph/0601002v2 22 Jan 2006 For many the infinities that still haunt physics cry for further and deeper quanti- zation, but there has been little agreement on exactly what and how far to quantize. According to Segal canonical quantization continued a drift of physical theory toward simple groups that special relativization began. He proposed on Darwinian grounds that further quantization should lead to simple groups [32]. Vilela Mendes initiated the work in that direction [37].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Second Quantization 7.1 Creation and Annihilation Operators
    Chapter 7 Second Quantization Creation and annihilation operators. Occupation number. Anticommutation relations. Normal product. Wick's theorem. One-body operator in second quantization. Hartree- Fock potential. Two-particle Random Phase Approximation (RPA). Two-particle Tamm- Dankoff Approximation (TDA). 7.1 Creation and annihilation operators In Fig. 3 of the previous Chapter it is shown the single-particle levels generated by a double-magic core containing A nucleons. Below the Fermi level (FL) all states hi are occupied and one can not place a particle there. In other words, the A-particle state j0i, with all levels hi occupied, is the ground state of the inert (frozen) double magic core. Above the FL all states are empty and, therefore, a particle can be created in one of the levels denoted by pi in the Figure. In Second Quantization one introduces the y j i creation operator cpi such that the state pi in the nucleus containing A+1 nucleons can be written as, j i y j i pi = cpi 0 (7.1) this state has to be normalized, that is, h j i h j y j i h j j i pi pi = 0 cpi cpi 0 = 0 cpi pi = 1 (7.2) from where it follows that j0i = cpi jpii (7.3) and the operator cpi can be interpreted as the annihilation operator of a particle in the state jpii. This implies that the hole state hi in the (A-1)-nucleon system is jhii = chi j0i (7.4) Occupation number and anticommutation relations One notices that the number y nj = h0jcjcjj0i (7.5) is nj = 1 is j is a hole state and nj = 0 if j is a particle state.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.04416V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]
    Path integral and Sommerfeld quantization Mikoto Matsuda1, ∗ and Takehisa Fujita2, † 1Japan Health and Medical technological college, Tokyo, Japan 2College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan (Dated: September 13, 2018) The path integral formulation can reproduce the right energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator potential, but it cannot resolve the Coulomb potential problem. This is because the path integral cannot properly take into account the boundary condition, which is due to the presence of the scattering states in the Coulomb potential system. On the other hand, the Sommerfeld quantization can reproduce the right energy spectrum of both harmonic oscillator and Coulomb potential cases since the boundary condition is effectively taken into account in this semiclassical treatment. The basic difference between the two schemes should be that no constraint is imposed on the wave function in the path integral while the Sommerfeld quantization rule is derived by requiring that the state vector should be a single-valued function. The limitation of the semiclassical method is also clarified in terms of the square well and δ(x) function potential models. PACS numbers: 25.85.-w,25.85.Ec I. INTRODUCTION Quantum field theory is the basis of modern theoretical physics and it is well established by now [1–4]. If the kinematics is non-relativistic, then one obtains the equation of quantum mechanics which is the Schr¨odinger equation. In this respect, if one solves the Schr¨odinger equation, then one can properly obtain the energy eigenvalue of the corresponding potential model . Historically, however, the energy eigenvalue is obtained without solving the Schr¨odinger equation, and the most interesting method is known as the Sommerfeld quantization rule which is the semiclassical method [5–8].
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture Notes with Course Quantum Theory
    SECOND QUANTIZATION Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory Dr. P.J.H. Denteneer Fall 2008 2 SECOND QUANTIZATION x1. Introduction and history 3 x2. The N-boson system 4 x3. The many-boson system 5 x4. Identical spin-0 particles 8 x5. The N-fermion system 13 x6. The many-fermion system 14 1 x7. Identical spin- 2 particles 17 x8. Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions 19 Second Quantization 1. Introduction and history Second quantization is the standard formulation of quantum many-particle theory. It is important for use both in Quantum Field Theory (because a quantized field is a qm op- erator with many degrees of freedom) and in (Quantum) Condensed Matter Theory (since matter involves many particles). Identical (= indistinguishable) particles −! state of two particles must either be symmetric or anti-symmetric under exchange of the particles. 1 ja ⊗ biB = p (ja1 ⊗ b2i + ja2 ⊗ b1i) bosons; symmetric (1a) 2 1 ja ⊗ biF = p (ja1 ⊗ b2i − ja2 ⊗ b1i) fermions; anti − symmetric (1b) 2 Motivation: why do we need the \second quantization formalism"? (a) for practical reasons: computing matrix elements between N-particle symmetrized wave functions involves (N!)2 terms (integrals); see the symmetrized states below. (b) it will be extremely useful to have a formalism that can handle a non-fixed particle number N, as in the grand-canonical ensemble in Statistical Physics; especially if you want to describe processes in which particles are created and annihilated (as in typical high-energy physics accelerator experiments). So: both for Condensed Matter and High-Energy Physics this formalism is crucial! (c) To describe interactions the formalism to be introduced will be vastly superior to the wave-function- and Hilbert-space-descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman Quantization
    3 FEYNMAN QUANTIZATION An introduction to path-integral techniques Introduction. By Richard Feynman (–), who—after a distinguished undergraduate career at MIT—had come in as a graduate student to Princeton, was deeply involved in a collaborative effort with John Wheeler (his thesis advisor) to shake the foundations of field theory. Though motivated by problems fundamental to quantum field theory, as it was then conceived, their work was entirely classical,1 and it advanced ideas so radicalas to resist all then-existing quantization techniques:2 new insight into the quantization process itself appeared to be called for. So it was that (at a beer party) Feynman asked Herbert Jehle (formerly a student of Schr¨odinger in Berlin, now a visitor at Princeton) whether he had ever encountered a quantum mechanical application of the “Principle of Least Action.” Jehle directed Feynman’s attention to an obscure paper by P. A. M. Dirac3 and to a brief passage in §32 of Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics 1 John Archibald Wheeler & Richard Phillips Feynman, “Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation,” Reviews of Modern Physics 17, 157 (1945); “Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action,” Reviews of Modern Physics 21, 425 (1949). Those were (respectively) Part III and Part II of a projected series of papers, the other parts of which were never published. 2 See page 128 in J. Gleick, Genius: The Life & Science of Richard Feynman () for a popular account of the historical circumstances. 3 “The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics,” Physicalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 3, 64 (1933). The paper is reprinted in J.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Quantization∗
    Second Quantization∗ Jörg Schmalian May 19, 2016 1 The harmonic oscillator: raising and lowering operators Lets first reanalyze the harmonic oscillator with potential m!2 V (x) = x2 (1) 2 where ! is the frequency of the oscillator. One of the numerous approaches we use to solve this problem is based on the following representation of the momentum and position operators: r x = ~ ay + a b 2m! b b r m ! p = i ~ ay − a : (2) b 2 b b From the canonical commutation relation [x;b pb] = i~ (3) follows y ba; ba = 1 y y [ba; ba] = ba ; ba = 0: (4) Inverting the above expression yields rm! i ba = xb + pb 2~ m! r y m! i ba = xb − pb (5) 2~ m! ∗Copyright Jörg Schmalian, 2016 1 y demonstrating that ba is indeed the operator adjoined to ba. We also defined the operator y Nb = ba ba (6) which is Hermitian and thus represents a physical observable. It holds m! i i Nb = xb − pb xb + pb 2~ m! m! m! 2 1 2 i = xb + pb − [p;b xb] 2~ 2m~! 2~ 2 2 1 pb m! 2 1 = + xb − : (7) ~! 2m 2 2 We therefore obtain 1 Hb = ! Nb + : (8) ~ 2 1 Since the eigenvalues of Hb are given as En = ~! n + 2 we conclude that the eigenvalues of the operator Nb are the integers n that determine the eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator. Nb jni = n jni : (9) y Using the above commutation relation ba; ba = 1 we were able to show that p a jni = n jn − 1i b p y ba jni = n + 1 jn + 1i (10) y The operator ba and ba raise and lower the quantum number (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Casimir-Polder Interaction in Second Quantization
    Universitat¨ Potsdam Institut fur¨ Physik und Astronomie Casimir-Polder interaction in second quantization Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) in der Wissen- schaftsdisziplin theoretische Physik. Eingereicht am 21. Marz¨ 2011 an der Mathematisch – Naturwissen- schaftlichen Fakultat¨ der Universitat¨ Potsdam von Jurgen¨ Schiefele Betreuer: PD Dr. Carsten Henkel This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Germany To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URL http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2011/5417/ URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-54171 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-54171 Abstract The Casimir-Polder interaction between a single neutral atom and a nearby surface, arising from the (quantum and thermal) fluctuations of the electromagnetic field, is a cornerstone of cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED), and theoretically well established. Recently, Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) of ultracold atoms have been used to test the predic- tions of cQED. The purpose of the present thesis is to upgrade single-atom cQED with the many-body theory needed to describe trapped atomic BECs. Tools and methods are developed in a second-quantized picture that treats atom and photon fields on the same footing. We formulate a diagrammatic expansion using correlation functions for both the electromagnetic field and the atomic system. The formalism is applied to investigate, for BECs trapped near surfaces, dispersion interactions of the van der Waals-Casimir-Polder type, and the Bosonic stimulation in spontaneous decay of excited atomic states.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Green's Functions Theory for Quantum Many-Body Systems
    Notes on Green's Functions Theory for Quantum Many-Body Systems Carlo Barbieri Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK June 2015 Literature A modern and compresensive monography is • W. H. Dickhoff and D. Van Neck, Many-Body Theory Exposed!, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2007). This book covers several applications of Green's functions done in recent years, including nuclear and electroncic systems. Most the material of these lectures can be found here. Two popular textbooks, that cover the almost complete formalism, are • A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971), • A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gorkov and I. E. Dzyaloshinski, Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics (Dover, New York, 1975). Other useful books on many-body Green's functions theory, include • R. D. Mattuck, A Guide to Feynmnan Diagrams in the Many-Body Problem, (McGraw-Hill, 1976) [reprinted by Dover, 1992], • J. P. Blaizot and G. Ripka, Quantum Theory of Finite Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1986), • J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems (Ben- jamin, Redwood City CA, 1988). 2 Chapter 1 Preliminaries: Basic Formulae of Second Quantization and Pictures Many-body Green's functions (MBGF) are a set of techniques that originated in quantum field theory but have also found wide applications to the many- body problem. In this case, the focus are complex systems such as crystals, molecules, or atomic nuclei. However, many-body Green's functions still share the same language with elementary particles theory, and have several concepts in common.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field: Photons and Operators G
    Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field: Photons and Operators G. M. Wysin [email protected], http://www.phys.ksu.edu/personal/wysin Department of Physics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-2601 August, 2011, Vi¸cosa, Brazil Summary The main ideas and equations for quantized free electromagnetic fields are developed and summarized here, based on the quantization procedure for coordinates (components of the vector potential A) and their canonically conjugate momenta (components of the electric field E). Expressions for A, E and magnetic field B are given in terms of the creation and annihilation operators for the fields. Some ideas are proposed for the inter- pretation of photons at different polarizations: linear and circular. Absorption, emission and stimulated emission are also discussed. 1 Electromagnetic Fields and Quantum Mechanics Here electromagnetic fields are considered to be quantum objects. It’s an interesting subject, and the basis for consideration of interactions of particles with EM fields (light). Quantum theory for light is especially important at low light levels, where the number of light quanta (or photons) is small, and the fields cannot be considered to be continuous (opposite of the classical limit, of course!). Here I follow the traditinal approach of quantization, which is to identify the coordinates and their conjugate momenta. Once that is done, the task is straightforward. Starting from the classical mechanics for Maxwell’s equations, the fundamental coordinates and their momenta in the QM sys- tem must have a commutator defined analogous to [x, px] = i¯h as in any simple QM system. This gives the correct scale to the quantum fluctuations in the fields and any other dervied quantities.
    [Show full text]