DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Agenda Transport Committee 28 July 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Transport Committee – OPEN Time and date: 9.30am, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 Venue: Committee Room 1, 1st Floor, Council Building, Garden Place, Hamilton. Committee Members: Councillors D G Macpherson (Chairperson) D L Bell G D Chesterman J R Gower K L H Gregory R E Hennebry A R O’Leary Committee Advisor: Mrs S D Collins Apologies: Cr Di Maio The above committee will meet as stated to consider the following items. M G Redman Chief Executive SECTION A: MATTERS FOR DECISION BY THE COMMITTEE UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY 1. Confirming the Agenda The Committee to confirm the agenda. 2. 13/16/24. Chairperson’s Report The Committee to receive the above report. (Copy attached pages 1 - 2) Transport Committee Agenda 28 July 2009 Page 1 of 3 3. 13/16/24. Resolution Monitoring Report The Committee to receive the above report. (Copy attached pages 3 - 5) 4. 13/16/24-2. Passenger Transport Subcommittee Meeting The Committee to receive the minutes of the Passenger Transport Subcommittee meeting held on 2 July 2009. (Copy attached pages 6 - 34) 5. 13/16/24-5. Regional Transport Committee Meeting The Committee to receive a report from the General Manager Works & Services and the minutes of the Regional Passenger Transport Subcommittee meeting held on 15 June 2009. (Copy attached pages 35 - 95) 6. 44/61. ACCESS Hamilton Update The Committee to consider a report and recommendations from the General Manager Works & Services concerning the above. (Copy attached pages 96 - 112) 7. 44/13. Active Transport Subcommittee Minutes The Committee to receive the minutes for the Active Transport Subcommittee meeting held on 2 July 2009. (Copy attached pages 113 - 134) Transport Committee Agenda 28 July 2009 Page 2 of 3 8. 13/16/24-4. Parking Management Subcommittee Minutes The Committee to receive the minutes of the Parking Management Subcommittee meeting held on 24 June 2009. (Copy attached pages 135 - 137) 9. 13/16/24-3. Transport Safety Subcommittee Minutes The Committee to receive the minutes for the Transport Safety Subcommittee meeting held on 25 June 2009 (Copy attached pages 138 - 145) 10. 13/16/24. Pukete Closure The Committee to consider a report and recommendations from the General Manager Works & Services concerning the above. (Copy attached pages 146 - 154) Transport Committee Agenda 28 July 2009 Page 3 of 3 Chair’s Report – Transport Committee, 28th July 2009 Longer heavier trucks on our roads? The Ministry of Transport’s moves to allow 20% heavier (and in some cases, longer) trucks to use certain roads in New Zealand has become very controversial very quickly. Consultation about this move has been abysmal, and the proposed changes seem to have been arranged as a fait accompli, following discussions between the Ministry and the Truck owners ‘union’ – otherwise known as the Road Transport Forum. Safety standards, local council road maintenance costs, environmental concerns, lack of use of rail – you name it, they’ve all been glossed over by those promoting the change. Evidence to back up glowing assertions in the MoT’s proposal have been singularly lacking – clearly the humphreys who have put this together haven’t recently had to travel along truck heaven (SH1 between Hamilton and Tokoroa – or any other major highway through the Waikato). HCC staff have prepared a very good submission (already circulated to Councillors) highlighting a series of major concerns about the processes and potential pitfalls of such a ‘rule’ change, and this has been forwarded to Trafinz, LGNZ and EW, who all appear to be incorporating aspects of our submission in their documents. Ngaruawahia-Hamilton Cycle/Walkway I have invited Simon Perry, Mike McCleery (from Perry’s) & Kiri Goulter (the Regional Tourism development officer) to participate in the discussion around the proposal for fast-tracking of the Ngaruawahia-Hamilton leg of the Waikato River route. Perry’s have been very strong proponents of this fantastic idea (see Active Transport Sub-Committee Minutes), and this project is a prime candidate for really good partnership arrangements, not to mention for John Key’s national cycleway concept – I think we should get strongly in behind it. Residents’ Survey – Rail The General Manager will present more detailed information at the Committee meeting, but questions asked in the just-completed survey of Hamilton residents’ views on a host of issues have shown a very strong and encouraging 85% support for a scheduled passenger rail service between Hamilton and Auckland. HCC representatives have a meeting with senior KiwiRail executives arranged for 30th July to further explore possibilities for such a service, and any worthwhile outcomes from this meeting will be reported back to Council as soon as possible. David Engwicht – Garden Place traffic light removal During his recent visit to Hamilton, David Engwicht made some really good points about how the engineering changes in Victoria St didn’t quite hit the mark in terms of encouraging greater community presence in the area. One of the issues discussed – which resonated with Councillors who had raised concerns about the Garden Place pedestrian crossing area - was the fact that the bollards, garden barriers and traffic signals in the raised ‘speed table’ area had all worked against it becoming a properly- functioning pedestrian-friendly area. To test the waters, I would like to propose that Council remove the traffic signals controlling pedestrian movements across Victoria St in front of Garden Place, and replace them with appropriate signage for both vehicles and pedestrians promoting and encouraging shared use of this space – effectively allowing pedestrians to use the area at any point with care (and likewise with cars) and giving better effect to Councillors’ previously expressed desires to improve connectivity for pedestrians. Although there have been good improvements as a result of the Victoria St upgrade, I don’t believe we have yet bitten the bullet needed to really improve facilities for pedestrians to the point where we can truly say ‘this is a shared space’. We need some vision and bolder thinking, and David certainly provided a sprk in this direction. Delay in Bus Lane enforcement It is very unfortunate that Government changes to proposed new laws no longer make it simpler and cheaper to enforce moving vehicle offences in our bus lanes – as previously promised, and as discussed in at least two earlier Committee meetings. Given that Government no longer thinks it necessary to support Councils who have brought in these engineering changes to assist the solution of their transport issues, I suggest we put some heat on Police to actively enforce in this area – after all, it should be easy enough as one of the bus lanes is right outside their door! Moved “That the Chair’s report be received”. Cr Dave Macpherson Chair, Transport Committee 23/7/09 Resolution Monitoring – Transport Committee – July 2009 No. Subject Resolution Current Status 1. Cycle Lane Projects – Provision of That staff monitor the implementation of Option Two – Report back to the Transport Additional Recessed Parking Consider each case on its merits using an agreed points system. Committee in 12 months time, once the Citywide Parking Plan has (Council, 5 November 2008) been developed. 2. ACCESS Hamilton Strategy Review That the draft ACCESS Hamilton Strategy Vision Document be Workshop to be held 28 July 2009 Update. approved in order to guide the development of a full review of ACCESS Hamilton noting that it will only be finalized once the review is complete, and the communication plan be approved. (Council, 8 April 2009) 3. Strategic network Action Plan a) Staff report back on options to accelerate the Wairere Drive Update extension project from Crosby Road to Cambridge Road to its earliest possible construction start date and to balance this On going out financially with the delivery programme of the Wairere Drive 4-laning project from Pukete Road to Resolution Drive in order to ensure that the combined project costings present a relatively neutral impact on the provisions made in the 2009/19 LTCCP, and b) Staff report back on options to accelerate the Wairere Drive extension project from Cambridge Road to Cobham Drive taking account of the government commitment to construct the Hamilton Bypass within 10 years. (Council, 8 April 2009) 4. Transport Safety Subcommittee Staff continue to investigate the issues raised in Forsyth and Mahana Roads and widen the focus to include more of the St On going Andrews suburb Page 1 of 3 Resolution Monitoring Report July 2009 (Council, 20 May 2009) 5. CityHeart - Victoria Street Trial Post a) following the completion of the physical works along Victoria Construction Street that a final survey of the five indicators in the report before the Committee be undertaken in October 2009 and reported to Council, October 2009 b) to address the issue of public parking in the centre median along Victoria Street (Hood-Collingwood) that Option Three - ‘Provide for Angle Parking’ be developed and implemented, subject to the scope of the works and costings being finalised, and c) to address the issue of free on-street parking that Option One - Free Saturday parking until the end of the Victoria Street contract works be adopted, complete with a communication plan but that details of a further parking promotion be brought back to the next Transport Committee Meeting. (Council 1 July 2009) 6. Mill Street - Trial Results a) approval be given to the physical closure of the right turn into the Pak’N’Save car park from Mill Street between Willoughby Street and Ulster Street, b) approval be given to the banning of the right turn from Mill Street into Victoria Street and that the removal be added to schedule C ‘turning restrictions’ in the Hamilton City Traffic bylaw 2007, and Page 2 of 3 Resolution Monitoring Report July 2009 a) further trial options be conducted to reduce through traffic on Victoria Street and consideration be given to further widening on Willoughby Street for southbound Traffic from Mill Street.
Recommended publications
  • River Plan Feedback

    River Plan Feedback

    Submission No: 235 November 2014 HCC draft River Plan feedback From: - Rob Davidson and Peter Bos, for Cycle Action Waikato. To: - Jacob Quinn and the River Plan Team What do we like about the proposed River plan? 1. The River Corridor Map is Great It clearly indicates access of both the riverpath and the river bridges, throughout the whole length of the area covered by the River Plan. It is vital that people get the River Plan’s ‘Key Themes’ from the River Corridor map. This is essential information, which needs to be quickly accessed. For clarity we request that the River Corridor Map’s Key includes the label (‘Key Themes’) above the six theme logos of: - Access, Recreation, Development, Natural Environment, Arts and Culture, and Tourism (shown vertically). 2. The proposed idea for “pedestrian bridge zones” is a great idea. Furthermore, the proposed idea to “Develop a plan to become a city of bridges” is a good one. These two proposals together have a huge capacity to alleviate the River’s existing Community Severance Effect, experienced by walking, cycling, and the mobility impaired. The river currently separates the eastern residential areas from the CBD commercial and employment zone. The river is a huge barrier to cycling access as the majority of Hamilton City’s bridges are not safe for cycling, nor cycle friendly (not comfortable to ride), as described below: - Whitora Bridge (in the past, when 2-laned) was safe with wide road shoulders to cycle in. However, HCC has recently done a huge amount of damage to cycling safety and connectivity, in three-laning the Whitiora Bridge by removing the bridge’s road shoulders (cycling space) to fit an extra vehicle lane.
  • Potential Shallow Seismic Sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017

    Potential Shallow Seismic Sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017

    Final Report on EQC Potential shallow seismic sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017 Vicki Moon & Willem de Lange School of Science University of Waikato 1. Introduction Following the exposure of a fault within a cutting in a new sub-division development in NE Hamilton, an initial investigation suggested the presence of 4 fault zones within the Hamilton Basin (Figure 1) that represented a potential hazard to infrastructure within the Basin. Hence, the overall aim of the proposal put to EQC was to refine the locations of four potentially active faults within the Hamilton Basin. To achieve this aim, two main phases of geophysical surveying were planned: 1. A seismic reflection survey along the Waikato River channel; and 2. Resistivity surveying to examine the sub- surface structure of identified fault zones. Additional MSc student projects, funded by Waikato Regional Council, were proposed to map the surface geology and geomorphology, and assess the liquefaction potential within the Hamilton Basin. During the course of the project, the initial earthworks Figure 1: Map of the four fault zones that were initially identified from geomorphology for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway and surface fault exposures, as presented in provided exposures of faults, which resulted in some the original proposal. modification of the project. 2. Methods The two main methodological approaches planned for this project were: 1. A high resolution CHIRP seismic reflection survey along the Waikato River within the Hamilton Basin. A previous study examining the stability of the river banks in response to fluctuating water levels (Wood, 2006) had obtained detailed data on the morphology of the river bed using multi-beam and single-beam echo sounders (MBES and SBES respectively), and side scan sonar.
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary

    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary

    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
  • GAS DISTRIBUTION Asset Management Plan 2018

    GAS DISTRIBUTION Asset Management Plan 2018

    GAS DISTRIBUTION Asset Management Plan 2018 Appendices GAS DISTRIBUTION ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2018 – APPENDIX A 1 Disclaimer: The information in this document has been prepared in good faith and represents First Gas’ intentions and opinions at the date of issue. However, First Gas operates in a dynamic environment (for example, the changing requirements of customers, deteriorating asset condition and the impact of severe weather events) and plans are constantly evolving to reflect the most current information and circumstances. Consequently, First Gas does not give any express or implied assurance about the accuracy of the information or whether First Gas will fully implement the plan or undertake the work mentioned in the document. None of First Gas Limited, its directors, officers, shareholders or representatives accepts any liability whatsoever by reason of, or in connection with, any information in this document or any actual or purported reliance on it by any person. First Gas may change any information in this document at any time. 2 GAS DISTRIBUTION ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2018 – APPENDIX A A. GLOSSARY TERM DEFINITION TERM DEFINITION AMMAT Asset Management Maturity Assessment Tool FSP Field Service Provided ALARP As Low as Reasonably Practicable FY2019 Financial year ending 30 September 2019 AMP Asset Management Plan GC Gas Chromatographs Asset Grade 1: means end of service life, immediate GDB Gas Distribution Business grades intervention required GIC Gas Industry Company – New Zealand gas industry Grade 2: means material deterioration
  • Track Changes Version

    Track Changes Version

    Track changes version for the hearing Taranaki Regional Council Notes on using this document This document identifies the various changes that have been recommended as a result of submissions on the notified Proposed Coastal Plan for Taranaki. Changes as a result of submissions are identified in red with new text being underlined and removed text being struck through. The submitters number is identified following the correction (e.g. (53) shows the changes were at the request of Taranaki Regional Council). Using this number the submitters request as well as officers recommendations can be identified when referenced against the appropriate provision in the Section 42A report. Consequential amendments to other areas of the Plan may occur to ensure consistency throughout, when this has occurred the submitter number who originally requested the amendment has been referenced, however, cross referencing within the Officers report may be more complicated as the requested change may be from a different area of the Plan. Some minor and inconsequential changes have occurred. These have been identified in blue with new text being underlined and removed text being struck through. Minor and inconsequential amendments have been identified for the convenience of readers and have only occurred where necessary to improve the readability of Plan provisions, align language within the Plan, or to better express the intent of a provision. These changes do not change the policy intent of any Plan provisions. COASTAL PLAN FOR TARANAKI i (This page is intentionally blank) COASTAL PLAN FOR TARANAKI ii Submitters Submitter number and name Submitter number and name Submitter number and name 1.
  • Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I

    Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I

    Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I CBER Contract Report 121 Client report prepared for Hamilton City Council by Toni S. Cornes, Rachel E. Thomson, Bruce D. Clarkson Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand May 31st 2012 Email: [email protected] i ii Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Report Context and Overview...................................................................................................... 2 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Hamilton City Boundaries ................................................................................................................ 3 Ecology of Hamilton ......................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Geology ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Landforms and Vegetation Types ................................................................................................ 4 Fauna of Hamilton
  • N.Z. Veteran and Vintage Motoring Se Pt E Mbe R, I 9 6 3

    N.Z. Veteran and Vintage Motoring Se Pt E Mbe R, I 9 6 3

    BEADED IBEELS I N.Z. VETERAN AND VINTAGE MOTORING SE PT E MBE R, I 9 6 3 o pr I .... I ~, "HORSELESS CARRIAGE" In 1893 the first succe ssful gasoline powered motorcar in the United Slates cruised down the main streets of Springfield, Ma ss., at a speed of five miles an hour! This car was made by two brothers, Charles E. and J. Frank Duryea. In 1896 Henry Ford drove his first car out of the machine shop in Detroit. Later, his system of machine-made, interchangeable parts, and assembly line production, put motorcars within the price ran ge of the man-in-the-street. By the beginning of the 20th century, 8,000 motorcars were registered in the United States. These were powered by steam, gasoline or electricity, and even then they did not look much like the original "Horseless Ca rr iage." Some of the laws passed in the early days of the motorcar make us chuckle today. For instance, one community ruled that if a horse refused to pas s a motor­ car the driver of the car must "take the machine apart • •• and conceal the parts in the grass." In some places motorcars were banned entirely, and angry farmers guarded their livestock with shotguns against these "contraptions of the devil." It is easy to see that early motorists were indeed brave pioneers, often running risks th at would be hard to imagine today, for they also had to contend witb the discomfort of rough roads, open driving seats and temperamental engines. Times have changed and those first motoring enthusiasts would be the first to appreciate the advances made both in car and tyre design since the exciting, stimulating days of the "Horseless Carriage." FIRESTO NE Tyres since the earliest days of motoring, have set the standard of reliability, economy and safety.
  • Classified Summarised Notes, North Island 1 July 1998 to 30 June 1999

    Classified Summarised Notes, North Island 1 July 1998 to 30 June 1999

    Notornis, 2000, Vol. 47: 215-234 0029-4470 O The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2000 CLASSIFIED SUMMARISED NOTES, NORTH ISLAND 1 JULY 1998 TO 30 JUNE 1999 Compiled by G. R. PARRISH 145 Church Street, Whangarei Classified Summarised Notes (CSN) are a selection of observations provided by members and friends of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand (OSNZ). The purpose of CSN is to record the results of census counts, anecdotal observations of behaviour and to improve our understanding of New Zealand bird distribution and status. In general, those observations that do not add to our knowledge of bird distribution in The Atlas of Bird Distribution in New Zealand are ignored. Most nest record observations, band recoveries and beach wrecks are covered by other OSNZ schemes and are not usually included in CSN. No records were received from Wairarapa this year. Records yet to be referred to the Rare Birds Committee on either Unusual Bird Report or Rare Bird Report forms are included here within square brackets, pending further examination. Such reports are not to be cited as definite records of the taxa concerned. Future reports of the Rare Birds Committee in Norornis should be consulted before reference is made to these records. All records of taxa on the lists published on the Society web page and available from Regional Representatives and Regional Recorders must be submitted for investigation by the Rare Birds Committee before they can be formally accepted and cited. Abbreviations for individual contributors: DJA, D.J. Goodwin; AGO,A. Gordon; EG, E. Graham; M&SG, M.
  • Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan SUMMARY Document – December 2020 1

    Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan SUMMARY Document – December 2020 1

    Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan SUMMARY Document – December 2020 1 1 INFORMATION Document Reference 2021 Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan Sport Waikato (Lead), Members of Waikato Local Authorities (including Mayors, Chief Executives and Technical Managers), Sport New Zealand, Waikato Regional Sports Organisations, Waikato Education Providers Contributing Parties Steering Group; Lance Vervoort, Garry Dyet, Gavin Ion and Don McLeod representing Local Authorities, Jamie Delich, Sport New Zealand, Matthew Cooper, Amy Marfell, Leanne Stewart and Rebecca Thorby, Sport Waikato. 2014 Plan: Craig Jones, Gordon Cessford, Visitor Solutions Contributing Authors 2018 Plan: Robyn Cockburn, Lumin 2021 Plan: Robyn Cockburn, Lumin Sign off Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan Advisory Group Version Draft 2021 Document Date February 2021 Special Thanks: To stakeholders across Local Authorities, Education, Iwi, Regional and National Sports Organisations, Recreation and Funding partners who were actively involved in the review of the 2021 Waikato Regional Active Spaces Plan. To Sport Waikato, who have led the development of this 2021 plan and Robyn Cockburn, Lumin, who has provided expert guidance and insight, facilitating the development of this plan. Disclaimer: Information, data and general assumptions used in the compilation of this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The contributing parties, led by Sport Waikato, have used this information in good faith and make no warranties or representations, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of this information. Interested parties should perform their own investigations, analysis and projections on all issues prior to acting in any way with regard to this project. All proposed facility approaches made within this document are developed in consultation with the contributing parties.
  • Elected Member Briefing 13 February Notes

    Elected Member Briefing 13 February Notes

    Elected Member Briefing 13 February Notes Time and date: 13 February 2017 Venue: Committee Room 1, Hamilton City Council Mayor King, Deputy Mayor Gallagher, Crs O’Leary, Pascoe, Tooman, In Attendance: Macpherson, Casson, Henry, Bunting, Southgate, Yeung, Mallett Apology for Full Session: Cr Taylor Mayor King, Deputy Mayor Gallagher, Councillors Macpherson, Southgate, Apology for Part Session O’Leary, and Bunting. Discussion The briefing session covered the following topics: 1. Draft Zoo Master Plan 2. Long Term Plan Roadmap 3. Asset Management 4. Integrated Growth Briefing 5. Access Hamilton Strategy There were a number of key points arising from discussions. 1. Draft Zoo Master Plan (presentation) The draft Zoo Master Plan was put on hold following the tragedy of Sam Kudeweh’s death and was to be re- activated this year. The draft plan would be released publicly today. A number of requests under the Local Government Information and Meetings Act relating to the draft Zoo Master Plan had been received however was not Council’s practice to release draft plans before they had been put before Elected Members. Elected Members asked questions and provided feedback in relation to: - The draft plan’s alignment with Council’s strategy for green spaces; - the importance of the connection between the Zoo and Waiwhakareke ; - the need for a timeline showing how these developments are inter-related; particularly timing of public access to Waiwhakareke; - opportunities for external funding and to leverage the success of the Hamilton Gardens; and - re-focusing the zoo to native species. 2. Long Term Plan Roadmap (handout) Elected Members were informed that Staff were currently working on the 2017/18 Annual Plan, work was to be starting on the 2018 – 2028 Long Term Plan (LTP) shortly.
  • Te Awa Lakes Assessment of Economic Effects Prepared for Perry Group Limited

    Te Awa Lakes Assessment of Economic Effects Prepared for Perry Group Limited

    Te Awa Lakes Assessment of Economic Effects Prepared for Perry Group Limited 12 October 2017 Document Quality Assurance Bibliographic reference for citation: RCG Limited 2017. Te Awa Lakes: Assessment of Economic Effects. Report prepared by RCG Limited for Perry Group Limited. Prepared by: John Polkinghorne Associate Director RCG Limited Status: Final Revision / version: 7 Issue date: 12 October 2017 Use and Reliance Every effort has been made to ensure the soundness and accuracy of the opinions, information, and forecasts expressed in this report. Information, opinions and forecasts contained in this report should be regarded solely as a general guide. While we believe statements in the report are correct, no liability is accepted for any incorrect statement, information or forecast. RCG disclaims any liability that may arise from any person acting on the material within. RCG Limited is the author of this report, and therefore holds all copyright and intellectual property rights relating to it. RCG requires that all parties permitted to use the report and the research contained within the report give full and correct acknowledgement of its authorship. Template revision: 20170704 0000 File ref: Te Awa Lakes 07 07 2017.docx Cover photograph: © Boffa Miskell Limited, 2017 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 Te Awa Lakes 1 The Purpose of This Report 2 Abbreviations 2 2.0 Nearby Land Uses 3 Overview of Te Rapa North, Horotiu and Surrounding Areas 3 Key Land Uses 3 3.0 Industrial Land Availability 8 Before Future Proof (The Mid-2000s) 8 After Future
  • Another Successful Photo Competition

    Another Successful Photo Competition

    Waikato Branch NEWSLETTER August 2012 CONTENTS Another successful photo competition 2 News 3 - 5 Trip and Event Reports We received 135 6 - 7 Trips and Talks entries this year in coming up the photographic competition, with 7 Photo competition the prizes being results awarded at the AGM. 8-9 KCC trips reports Prizes were and trips coming up sponsored by Snapshot Cameras, Imageland, Noel Leemings and Trek n Travel. Congratulations to all the winners. Please let us know Jenny West, overall winner, with photo competition organiser Jenny West was if you now have an Colleen Brimblecombe email address and overall competition would prefer not to winner for her photo receive hard copy of series of Nikau. this newsletter (this Ian Patrick won saves us printing first and second in costs, and saves the Native Fauna trees and it will be in category with White colour) faced Storm Petrel Contributions for (right) and Kotuku. the newsletter are Other results on always welcome. page 7. Photos should be at least 300kb. Email to waikato.branch@ forestanddbird.org. nz For regional events calendar: www. envirocentre.org.nz Walter Scott Avatar moth at Reserve Denniston The new species of moth found on the threatened Denniston Plateau during our recent BioBlitz now has a Great news! As blockbuster name: Avatar. the Otorohanga Entomologist Brian Patrick and District Council Oparau 42.8ha Pirongia - Kawhia his son Hamish selected the name from over 100 entries Pekanui Stream has solved the generated from our moth naming competition. “It was by washout problem far the best one. It’s a novel name and the movie is about a Scott Rd on the main track k rac tt Rd mining company that threatens to devastate a human-like Sco ound T below Scott Road R species that’s living in harmony with nature.