DOCSLIB.ORG

Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I Key Ecological Sites of Hamilton City Volume I CBER Contract Report 121 Client report prepared for Hamilton City Council by Toni S. Cornes, Rachel E. Thomson, Bruce D. Clarkson Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand May 31st 2012 Email: [email protected] i ii Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Report Context and Overview...................................................................................................... 2 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Hamilton City Boundaries ................................................................................................................ 3 Ecology of Hamilton ......................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Geology ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Landforms and Vegetation Types ................................................................................................ 4 Fauna of Hamilton City ................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 8 Identification of Potential Sites ........................................................................................................ 8 Field Survey ...................................................................................................................................... 8 General Information ..................................................................................................................... 8 Description of the Site .................................................................................................................. 9 Habitat and Vegetation Description ............................................................................................ 9 Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................................................... 10 Threats ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Human Associated Activities ...................................................................................................... 10 Climatic Conditions during Survey.............................................................................................. 10 Context/Nearby Site Information ............................................................................................... 10 Management Recommendations ............................................................................................... 10 Results .............................................................................................................................................. 12 City-wide Extent of Key Sites ......................................................................................................... 12 Extent of the Key Sites by Land Unit .............................................................................................. 12 Analysis of Representativeness ...................................................................................................... 13 Analysis of Ecological Rankings ...................................................................................................... 14 Spatial Distribution of Key Sites ..................................................................................................... 15 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Spatial Distribution of Key sites ..................................................................................................... 17 Gully Systems ............................................................................................................................. 17 iii Peat lakes ................................................................................................................................... 19 Riverbanks .................................................................................................................................. 20 Reduced Key sites .......................................................................................................................... 20 Nawton Wetland ........................................................................................................................ 20 Whyte St kahikatea .................................................................................................................... 20 Pukete Wetland .......................................................................................................................... 21 Results in a Regional Context ......................................................................................................... 21 Threats to the Key Sites ................................................................................................................. 22 Invasive Weeds ........................................................................................................................... 22 Vertebrate Pests ......................................................................................................................... 22 Surrounding Land Uses............................................................................................................... 22 Habitat Sustainability ................................................................................................................. 23 Threat Mitigation ........................................................................................................................... 23 Weed Control ............................................................................................................................. 23 Connectivity and Buffering ......................................................................................................... 23 Interactions with Landowners .................................................................................................... 24 Long Term Strategy .................................................................................................................... 24 Further Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 26 Monitoring ................................................................................................................................. 27 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... 28 References....................................................................................................................................... 28 Appendix one: SNA Review – Site Visit Assessment Form ................................................................ 32 Appendix two: Key Ecological Sites in Hamilton City …….……………………………………………………………..37 Appendix three: Ecological significance justification for key sites .................................................... 42 Appendix four: Species List ................................................................................................................ 47 Reviewed by: Approved for Release by: Kembley Pudney Daniel Laughlin Hamilton City Council University of Waikato iv Executive Summary Ecological sites of significance previously identified in 2000 were reviewed in 2011. Natural vegetation in areas acquired by the city since 2000 was also surveyed to identify any new key sites. In total seventy key sites that met the Waikato Regional Council Regional Policy Statement criteria for ecological significance were identified across Hamilton City. Of the original key sites, the total area covered by sites, average site size and overall quality of sites had increased between the 2000 and 2011 surveys. This was due to restoration efforts across the city by Hamilton City Council and the community. Vegetation restoration efforts have had other biodiversity and ecological benefits such as providing additional habitat for the city’s increasing tui population. Key sites are not spread evenly across the city or across landform types. Most key sites are either in gullies or adjoining the Waikato River. Less than 1% of urban alluvial plains and peat bogs are key sites. Two sites on private land have degraded and no longer meet the ecological significance criteria in 2011. The current survey utilised a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hamilton Gardens Waikato Museum
    ‘Shovel ready’ Infrastructure Projects: Project Information Form About this Project Information Form The Government is seeking to identify ‘shovel ready’ infrastructure projects from the Public and certain Private Infrastructure sector participants that have been impacted by COVID 19. Ministers have advised that they wish to understand the availability, benefits, geographical spread and scale of ‘shovel ready’ projects in New Zealand. These projects will be considered in the context of any potential Government response to support the construction industry, and to provide certainty on a pipeline of projects to be commenced or re- commenced, once the COVID 19 Response Level is suitable for construction to proceed. The Infrastructure Industry Reference Group, chaired by Mark Binns, is leading this work at the request of Ministers, and is supported by Crown Infrastructure Partners Limited (CIP). CIP is now seeking information using this Project Information Form from relevant industry participants for 1 projects/programmes that may be suitable for potential Government support. The types of projects we have been asked to consider is outlined in Mark Binns’ letter dated 25 March 2020. CIP has prepared Project Information Guidelines which outline the approach CIP will take in reviewing and categorising the project information it receives (Guidelines). Please submit one form for each project that you consider meets the criteria set out in the Guidelines. If you have previously provided this information in another format and/or as part of a previous process feel free to submit it in that format and provide cross-references in this form. Please provide this information by 5 pm on Tuesday 14 April 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)
    1 NZFRI collection wish list for Otanewainuku ED (Report prepared on 13 August 2013) Fern Ally Isolepis cernua Lycopodiaceae Isolepis inundata Lycopodium fastigiatum Isolepis marginata Lycopodium scariosum Isolepis pottsii Psilotaceae Isolepis prolifera Tmesipteris lanceolata Lepidosperma australe Lepidosperma laterale Gymnosperm Schoenoplectus pungens Cupressaceae Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Schoenus apogon Cupressus macrocarpa Schoenus tendo Pinaceae Uncinia filiformis Pinus contorta Uncinia gracilenta Pinus patula Uncinia rupestris Pinus pinaster Uncinia scabra Pinus ponderosa Hemerocallidaceae Pinus radiata Dianella nigra Pinus strobus Phormium cookianum subsp. hookeri Podocarpaceae Phormium tenax Podocarpus totara var. totara Iridaceae Prumnopitys taxifolia Crocosmia xcrocosmiiflora Libertia grandiflora Monocotyledon Libertia ixioides Agapanthaceae Watsonia bulbillifera Agapanthus praecox Juncaceae Alliaceae Juncus articulatus Allium triquetrum Juncus australis Araceae Juncus conglomeratus Alocasia brisbanensis Juncus distegus Arum italicum Juncus edgariae Lemna minor Juncus effusus var. effusus Zantedeschia aethiopica Juncus sarophorus Arecaceae Juncus tenuis var. tenuis Rhopalostylis sapida Luzula congesta Asparagaceae Luzula multiflora Asparagus aethiopicus Luzula picta var. limosa Asparagus asparagoides Orchidaceae Cordyline australis x banksii Acianthus sinclairii Cordyline banksii x pumilio Aporostylis bifolia Asteliaceae Corunastylis nuda Collospermum microspermum Diplodium alobulum Commelinaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4
    PARK ROAD SULLIVAN ROAD DIVERS ROAD SH 1 LAW CRESCENT BIRDWOOD ROAD WASHER ROAD HOROTIU BRIDGE ROAD CLOVERFIELD LANE HOROTIU ROAD KERNOTT ROAD PATERSON ROAD GATEWAY DRIVE EVOLUTION DRIVE HE REFORD D RIVE IN NOVA TIO N W A Y MARTIN LANE BOYD ROAD HENDERSON ROAD HURRELL ROAD HUTCHINSON ROAD BERN ROAD BALLARD ROAD T NNA COU R VA SA OSBORNE ROAD RK D RIVER DOWNS PA RIVE E WILLIAMSON ROAD G D RI ONION ROAD C OU N T REYNOLDS ROAD RY L ANE T E LANDON LANE R A P A A ROAD CESS MEADOW VIEW LANE Attachment 4 C SHERWOOD DOWNS DRIVE HANCOCK ROAD KAY ROAD REDOAKS CLOSE REID ROAD RE E C SC E V E EN RI L T IV D A R GRANTHAM LANE KE D D RIVERLINKS LANE RIVERLINKS S K U I P C A E L O M C R G N E A A A H H D O LOFTUS PLACE W NORTH CITY ROAD F I ONION ROAD E LD DROWERGLEN S Pukete Farm Park T R R O SE EE T BE MCKEE STREET R RY KUPE PLACE C LIMBER HILL HIGHVIEW COURT RESCENT KESTON CRESCENT VIKING LANE CLEWER LANE NICKS WAY CUM BE TRAUZER PLACE GRAHAM ROAD OLD RUFFELL ROAD RLA KOURA DRIVE ND DELIA COURT DR IV ET ARIE LANE ARIE E E SYLVESTER ROAD TR BREE PLACE E S V TRENT LANE M RI H A D ES G H UR C B WESSEX PLACE WALTHAM PLACE S GO R IA P Pukete Farm Park T L T W E M A U N CE T I HECTOR DRIVE I A R H E R S P S M A AMARIL LANE IT IR A N M A N I N G E F U A E G ED BELLONA PLACE Y AR D M E P R S T L I O L IN Moonlight Reserve MAUI STREET A I A L G C A P S D C G A D R T E RUFFELL ROAD R L L A O E O N R A E AVALON DRIVEAVALON IS C N S R A E R E D C Y E E IS E E L C N ANN MICHELE STREET R E A NT ESCE NT T WAKEFIELD PLACE E T ET B T V TE KOWHAI ROAD KAPUNI STRE
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Charts for Native to the West Booklet
    26 Pohutukawa • Oi exposed coastal ecosystem KEY ♥ Nurse plant ■ Main component ✤ rare ✖ toxic to toddlers coastal sites For restoration, in this habitat: ••• plant liberally •• plant generally • plant sparingly Recommended planting sites Back Boggy Escarp- Sharp Steep Valley Broad Gentle Alluvial Dunes Area ment Ridge Slope Bottom Ridge Slope Flat/Tce Medium trees Beilschmiedia tarairi taraire ✤ ■ •• Corynocarpus laevigatus karaka ✖■ •••• Kunzea ericoides kanuka ♥■ •• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• Metrosideros excelsa pohutukawa ♥■ ••••• • •• •• Small trees, large shrubs Coprosma lucida shining karamu ♥ ■ •• ••• ••• •• •• Coprosma macrocarpa coastal karamu ♥ ■ •• •• •• •••• Coprosma robusta karamu ♥ ■ •••••• Cordyline australis ti kouka, cabbage tree ♥ ■ • •• •• • •• •••• Dodonaea viscosa akeake ■ •••• Entelea arborescens whau ♥ ■ ••••• Geniostoma rupestre hangehange ♥■ •• • •• •• •• •• •• Leptospermum scoparium manuka ♥■ •• •• • ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• Leucopogon fasciculatus mingimingi • •• ••• ••• • •• •• • Macropiper excelsum kawakawa ♥■ •••• •••• ••• Melicope ternata wharangi ■ •••••• Melicytus ramiflorus mahoe • ••• •• • •• ••• Myoporum laetum ngaio ✖ ■ •••••• Olearia furfuracea akepiro • ••• ••• •• •• Pittosporum crassifolium karo ■ •• •••• ••• Pittosporum ellipticum •• •• Pseudopanax lessonii houpara ■ ecosystem one •••••• Rhopalostylis sapida nikau ■ • •• • •• Sophora fulvida west coast kowhai ✖■ •• •• Shrubs and flax-like plants Coprosma crassifolia stiff-stemmed coprosma ♥■ •• ••••• Coprosma repens taupata ♥ ■ •• •••• ••
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Pest Plants
    REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY © Crown Copyright 2010 145 Contract Report No. 2075 REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, J. 1885: On the botany of Te Aroha Mountain. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 17: 275-281 Allaby, M. (ed) 1994: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 415 pp. Allan, H. H. 1982: Flora of New Zealand. Vol 1. Government Printer, Wellington. Allen, D.J. 1983: Notes on the Kaimai-Mamaku Forest Park. New Zealand Forest Service, Tauranga (unpublished). 20 p. Allen R.B. and McLennan M.J. 1983, Indigenous forest survey manual: two inventory methods. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 48. 73 pp. Allen R.B. 1992: An inventory method for describing New Zealand vegetation. Forest Research Institute Bulletin No. 181. 25 pp. Anon 1975: Biological reserves and forest sanctuaries. What’s New in Forest Research 21. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua. 4 p. Anon 1982: Species list from Kopurererua Stream. New Zealand Wildlife Service National Habitat Register, May 1982. Bay of Plenty Habitat sheets, Folder 2, records room, Rotorua Conservancy. Anon 1983a: Reserve proposals. Northern Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Background notes for SFSRAC Meeting and Inspection, 1983. Tauranga. 12 pp. Anon 1983b: The inadequacy of the ecological reserves proposed for the Kaimai-Mamaku State Forest Park. Joint campaign on Native Forests, Nelson. 14 p. plus 3 references. Anon 1983c: Overwhelming support to save the Kaimai-Mamaku. Bush Telegraph 12: 1-2. Wellington. Anon 1989: Conservation values of natural areas on Tasman Forestry freehold and leasehold land. Unpublished report for Tasman Forestry Ltd, Department of Conservation and Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Brymer Crawshaw Nawton Pukete Flagstaff Sylvester Maeroa Bryant
    M R T H A I U V E I E T L S E IN O T C R N K R A R E N E L C ROV E P H G E N O S Y I T A A E E O AN N E E R H D S R S L E T C L V I GAL N E C I E Y E R R V S R I R E Guide to using this map: D R L O A L D Y I A E P E H N E R A E C D A L C E G C E A A A D D R I I V L E S P This is a map of the area containing your property. R E O E C O L R D I C S I C E A A M O N P I V T R L R I H O S L E D E O I T R W R R C L D E H O D C K P M O O S V H O R E S R AVE P A G A VOU NUE E NT N A W C A The map shows notable local changes which are C R E S CE T Y DE R N B E EET R R I E ST VE proposed for the mapped area. E C E L T R IC H E E L A M R R Z N T O IM A N I S A I N U U D P T T P Sylvester H KA TA S H K E P E L S R I A B A S C E E See the map legend for an index of these local O N U P L L E A changes and check the map to see which ones V E C C D A LA R P E T P A E Flagstaff Y S E E U O D IM R U E affect your area of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Shallow Seismic Sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017
    Final Report on EQC Potential shallow seismic sources in the Hamilton Basin Project 16/717 5 July 2017 Vicki Moon & Willem de Lange School of Science University of Waikato 1. Introduction Following the exposure of a fault within a cutting in a new sub-division development in NE Hamilton, an initial investigation suggested the presence of 4 fault zones within the Hamilton Basin (Figure 1) that represented a potential hazard to infrastructure within the Basin. Hence, the overall aim of the proposal put to EQC was to refine the locations of four potentially active faults within the Hamilton Basin. To achieve this aim, two main phases of geophysical surveying were planned: 1. A seismic reflection survey along the Waikato River channel; and 2. Resistivity surveying to examine the sub- surface structure of identified fault zones. Additional MSc student projects, funded by Waikato Regional Council, were proposed to map the surface geology and geomorphology, and assess the liquefaction potential within the Hamilton Basin. During the course of the project, the initial earthworks Figure 1: Map of the four fault zones that were initially identified from geomorphology for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway and surface fault exposures, as presented in provided exposures of faults, which resulted in some the original proposal. modification of the project. 2. Methods The two main methodological approaches planned for this project were: 1. A high resolution CHIRP seismic reflection survey along the Waikato River within the Hamilton Basin. A previous study examining the stability of the river banks in response to fluctuating water levels (Wood, 2006) had obtained detailed data on the morphology of the river bed using multi-beam and single-beam echo sounders (MBES and SBES respectively), and side scan sonar.
    [Show full text]
  • Pteridologist 2007
    PTERIDOLOGIST 2007 CONTENTS Volume 4 Part 6, 2007 EDITORIAL James Merryweather Instructions to authors NEWS & COMMENT Dr Trevor Walker Chris Page 166 A Chilli Fern? Graham Ackers 168 The Botanical Research Fund 168 Miscellany 169 IDENTIFICATION Male Ferns 2007 James Merryweather 172 TREE-FERN NEWSLETTER No. 13 Hyper-Enthusiastic Rooting of a Dicksonia Andrew Leonard 178 Most Northerly, Outdoor Tree Ferns Alastair C. Wardlaw 178 Dicksonia x lathamii A.R. Busby 179 Tree Ferns at Kells House Garden Martin Rickard 181 FOCUS ON FERNERIES Renovated Palace for Dicksoniaceae Alastair C. Wardlaw 184 The Oldest Fernery? Martin Rickard 185 Benmore Fernery James Merryweather 186 FEATURES Recording Ferns part 3 Chris Page 188 Fern Sticks Yvonne Golding 190 The Stansfield Memorial Medal A.R. Busby 191 Fern Collections in Manchester Museum Barbara Porter 193 What’s Dutch about Dutch Rush? Wim de Winter 195 The Fine Ferns of Flora Græca Graham Ackers 203 CONSERVATION A Case for Ex Situ Conservation? Alastair C. Wardlaw 197 IN THE GARDEN The ‘Acutilobum’ Saga Robert Sykes 199 BOOK REVIEWS Encyclopedia of Garden Ferns by Sue Olsen Graham Ackers 170 Fern Books Before 1900 by Hall & Rickard Clive Jermy 172 Britsh Ferns DVD by James Merryweather Graham Ackers 187 COVER PICTURE: The ancestor common to all British male ferns, the mountain male fern Dryopteris oreades, growing on a ledge high on the south wall of Bealach na Ba (the pass of the cattle) Unless stated otherwise, between Kishorn and Applecross in photographs were supplied the Scottish Highlands - page 172. by the authors of the articles PHOTO: JAMES MERRYWEATHER in which they appear.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary
    2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared for Waikato River Authority March 2016 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Prepared by: Bruce Williamson (Diffuse Sources) John Quinn (NIWA) Erica Williams (NIWA) Cheri van Schravendijk-Goodman (WRRT) For any information regarding this report please contact: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd PO Box 11115 Hamilton 3251 Phone +64 7 856 7026 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: HAM2016-011 Report date: March 2016 NIWA Project: WRA14203 Quality Assurance Statement Reviewed by: Dr Bob Wilcock Formatting checked by: Alison Bartley Approved for release by: Bryce Cooper Photo: Waikato River at Wellington Street Beach, Hamilton. [John Quinn, NIWA] 2016 Pilot Waikato River Report Card: Methods and Technical Summary Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Reflections from the Project Team ..................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 18 1.1 Report Cards ........................................................................................................... 18 1.2 2015 Pilot Waikato River Report Cards .................................................................. 20 1.3 Purpose of this Technical Summary .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flagstaff Horsham Downs Rototuna Huntington Bryant Chedworth
    A C E LAC L ACE A P PL N C E D T EIG I R V E O N VE I NS O O SO W H R N R E O B O D Y N A U R A A PL U L FORD AC Guide to using this map: E L A E R S W D T L Y C Y H E A E A A E K E A A A N N V N D N M I V I C A L A R M E R A D B S W E A A M EW P R L A P D ALE This is a map of the area containing your property. W I N M M L UILD FOR D W E G N V Y S O H V E D R O T I LAC P R E P E A E E R R T D A N H O W O R I E H ST T E N R T ID A T I R TW O C M N P W W V M N E LA R WESTBU E O O CE A A R G S U Y HA N D M S U T M D N E T PS O W W T S B E Horsham Downs E A O N C N A S S R L E N E R O R N H E D P The map shows notable local changes which are A E A O C D D R C V V L O A I R R I A U V R E A H L O E O I E E C L P AC D G B V DRIVE G L P D S IE P A S I D OWR P E L proposed for the mapped area.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Road Names in Hamilton
    Michelle van Straalen From: official information Sent: Monday, 3 August 2020 16:30 To: Cc: official information Subject: LGOIMA 20177 - List of road and street names in Hamilton. Attachments: FW: LGOIMA 20177 - List of road and street names in Hamilton. ; LGOIMA - 20177 Street Names.xlsx Kia ora Further to your information request of 6 July 2020 in respect of a list of road and street names in Hamilton, I am now able to provide Hamilton City Council’s response. You requested: Does the Council have a complete list of road and street names? Our response: Please efind th information you requested attached. We trust this information is of assistance to you. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further queries. Kind regards, Michelle van Straalen Official Information Advisor | Legal Services | Governance Unit DDI: 07 974 0589 | [email protected] Hamilton City Council | Private Bag 3010 | Hamilton 3240 | www.hamilton.govt.nz Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter This email and any attachments are strictly confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. You should not read, copy, use, change, alter, disclose or deal in any manner whatsoever with this email or its attachments without written authorisation from the originating sender. Hamilton City Council does not accept any liability whatsoever in connection with this email and any attachments including in connection with computer viruses, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the content of this email, or any attachment, shall not be considered as creating any binding legal obligation upon Hamilton City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Systems and Reproduction of Indigenous Shrubs in Fragmented
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Breeding systems and reproduction of indigenous shrubs in fragmented ecosystems A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy III Plant Ecology at Massey University by Merilyn F Merrett .. � ... : -- �. � Massey University Palrnerston North, New Zealand 2006 Abstract Sixteen native shrub species with various breeding systems and pollination syndromes were investigated in geographically separated populations to determine breeding systems, reproductive success, population structure, and habitat characteristics. Of the sixteen species, seven are hermaphroditic, seven dioecious, and two gynodioecious. Two of the dioecious species are cryptically dioecious, producing what appear to be perfect, hermaphroditic flowers,but that functionas either male or female. One of the study species, Raukauaanomalus, was thought to be dioecious, but proved to be hermaphroditic. Teucridium parvifolium, was thought to be hermaphroditic, but some populations are gynodioecious. There was variation in self-compatibility among the fo ur AIseuosmia species; two are self-compatible and two are self-incompatible. Self­ incompatibility was consistent amongst individuals only in A. quercifolia at both study sites, whereas individuals in A. macrophylia ranged from highly self-incompatible to self-compatible amongst fo ur study sites. The remainder of the hermaphroditic study species are self-compatible. Five of the species appear to have dual pollination syndromes, e.g., bird-moth, wind-insect, wind-animal. High levels of pollen limitation were identified in three species at fo ur of the 34 study sites.
    [Show full text]