Hemidactylus Frenatus)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hemidactylus Frenatus) HTTPS://JOURNALS.KU.EDU/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSREPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 27(3):479–484189 • DEC 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLESThe Asian House Gecko . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: (HemidactylusOn the Road to Understanding the Ecology and frenatusConservation of the Midwest’s) Giant Established Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 in . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: NaturalA Hypothetical Excursion Vegetation ............................................................................................................................ of Oaxaca,Robert MexicoW. Henderson 198 RESEARCH ARTICLES . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central andJ. Western Lindley Texas McKay .......................1 and Emily Olga Henry, Milenkaya Jason Brewer,2 Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida 1 .............................................15 Avondale Road,Brian J.Asheville, Camposano, North Kenneth Carolina L. Krysko, 28803, Kevin USAM. Enge, ([email protected]) Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 2Biology Department, Warren Wilson College, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778, USA CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More Than Mammals ...................................................................................................................................................................... 223 he Asian House. The “DowGecko Jones Index”(Hemidactylus of Biodiversity ...............................................................................................................................frenatus) is the cessful long-distance dispersal............ (Norval 225 et al. 2012). Other Tmost widelyHUSBANDRY introduced gecko in the world (Weterings traits that contribute to its success in establishing new colo- and Vetter 2018).. Captive While Care ofnative the Central to Netted tropical Dragon Asia....................................................................................................... and the nies include the ability of Shannon females Plummer to store226 viable sperm for as Indian Subcontinent (Bansal and Karanth 2010), the current long as 54 weeks (Yamamoto and Ota 2006), tolerance of the PROFILE extent of its distribution also includes the Neotropics between eggs to saltwater, year-round reproduction in tropical zones . Kraig Adler: A Lifetime Promoting Herpetology ................................................................................................ Michael L. Treglia 234 Mexico and Ecuador, coastal East Africa, Madagascar, and (Ramírez-Bautista et al. 2006; McKay and Phillips 2012), northern and easternCOMMENTARY Australia (Fig. 1). This species is also and females laying as many as three clutches of 1–2 eggs per a highly successful. Thecolonizer Turtles Have of Been islands Watching and Me ........................................................................................................................is established on year (Yamamoto and Ota 2006). Eric Gangloff 238 many islands inBOOK the Pacific, REVIEW Indian, and Atlantic Oceans. The Establishment of H. frenatus in areas outside Asia is of range is still expanding. Threatened and Amphibians new distributional of the World edited recordsby S.N. Stuart, are M. Hoffmann,conservation J.S. Chanson, concern. N.A. Cox, In much of its non-native range, H. published every year.R. Berridge, P. Ramani, and B.E. Young ..............................................................................................................frenatus is the only lizard occupying Robert Powell buildings243 and thus fill- Outside Asia, H. frenatus is still largely confined to arti- ing a previously unoccupied niche. However, in places where CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 ficial environments NATURAL associated HISTORY with RESEARCH human settlement, REPORTS: Summaries espe- of Publishedother Reportsgeckos on Natural occupy History artificial ................................. structures, 247 H. frenatus may cially buildings, butNEWBRIEFS also vehicles ............................................................................................................................... and piles of hard materi- outcompete and....................................................... displace prior residents, 248 as has been seen als or rubbish (McKay EDITORIAL et al. INFORMATION 2009; Norval ............................................................................................................................... et al. 2012). The with Lepidodactylus lugubris...................... in Hawai’i 251 (Case et al. 1994), FOCUS ON CONSERVATION: A Project You Can Support ............................................................................................... 252 willingness of the species to rapidly take up residence in a Phyllodactylus palmeus on Utila in the Honduran Bay Islands newly arrived refuge has been an important factor in its suc- (Powell 2003), and H. turcicus in northern Mexico (Farr et al. Front Cover. Shannon Plummer. Back Cover. Michael Kern Totat et velleseque audant mo Totat et velleseque audant mo estibus inveliquo velique rerchil estibus inveliquo velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque fugiatis maionsequat eumque moditia erere nonsedis ma sectiatur moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia- ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as accullabo. Fig. 1. Global distribution records of the Asian House Gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus). Red dots mark records derived from GBIF (2019). Predicted range (pink) was redrawn from Rödder et al. (2008) and Weterings and Vetter (2018). Copyright is held by the authors. Articles in R&A are made available under a 479 Reptiles & Amphibians ISSN 1098-6324 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. MCKAY AND MILENKAYA REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 27(3):479–484 • DEC 2020 Fig. 2. Records of the Asian House Gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus) from the Mexican state of Oaxaca. Orange dots mark locations from GBIF (2019), black dots indicate the authors’ opportunistic records from artificial structures, and green stars denote authors’ records from natural vegetation communities. Terrestrial elevational zones are mapped in white (sea level–500 m asl), pale gray (501–1,000 m asl), gray (1,001–2,000 m asl), dark gray (2,001–3,000 m asl), and very dark gray (above 3,001 m asl). 2009). Where H. frenatus has invaded natural habitats, it also in monsoon forests, are far from any point of regular human can exert a negative impact on native geckos. For example, contact. Cogger et al. (2005) mentioned a record of H. fre- H. frenatus was responsible for the decline of native species natus from “a natural area” on Norfolk Island, but provided of Nactus in the Mascarene Islands (Cole et al. 2005) and no further details. The species is also a common resident of has been implicated in declines of Phelsuma guimbeaui and low coastal shrubs on West Island of Ashmore Reef, Western P. ornata on Mauritius (McKeown 1983; Cole and Harris Australia (Somaweera et al. 2020). In the Mariana Islands, 2011). Additionally, H. frenatus may serve as a vector of para- H. frenatus has been recorded from coconut palms lining a sites (Barnett et al. 2018; Norval et al. 2018), and its impact beach on the island of Tinian (Wiles et al. 1989) and from on native biodiversity via predation or other interspecific native tropical forest on the island of Aguiguan (Esselstyn et interactions is largely unknown. The potential for harmful al. 2002). Werner (1990) described H. frenatus as the most impact, both on other geckos and more broadly on ecosys- conspicuous reptile in natural habitats on Oahu, Hawai’i. In tems, is higher where H. frenatus becomes established in natu- Mexico, Hardy and McDiarmid (1969) listed H. frenatus from ral vegetation communities. tropical thorn forest in the vicinity of Los Mochis, Sinaloa. In Despite its enormous range, few examples of H. frenatus Tamaulipas, Farr et al. (2009) recorded the species from an occupying natural vegetation exist outside Asia. The majority area of tropical deciduous and gallery forests at Poza Madre of these are from northern Australia, where H. frenatus is estab- (11 km SE of Ocampo), where individuals were found inside lished in eucalyptus woodland, riparian vegetation communi- logs and in abandoned palapas, and from beneath the bark of a ties, mangrove, coastal forests dominated by Casuarina spp., dead tree in a park, about 0.5 km from any artificial structure, and monsoon forests in the Northern Territory (Kikkawa and in the city of Tampico. In Jalisco, Cruz-Sáenz et al. (2013) Monteith 1980; Woinarski et al. 1999; Keim 2002; McKay et recorded these geckos from Estero El Salado, a small nature al. 2009) and in coastal Casuarina woodland and vine scrub in reserve within the urban bounds of Puerto Vallarta, where it northern Queensland (Clarke 2006). Many of these locations inhabits semi-deciduous forest and thorn forest. Herein we
Recommended publications
  • Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd revised edition, January 2009 Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Report prepared by: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Network World Resources Institute (WRI) Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy (IFP) University of Freiburg Freiburg University Press 2nd revised edition, January 2009 The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world's foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation since 1989, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. Its core business is managing data about ecosystems and biodiversity, interpreting and analysing that data to provide assessments and policy analysis, and making the results
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation And
    CLASS 9th SUBJECT: GEOGRAPHY CHAPTER 5: NATURAL VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. India belongs to which of the following categories according to natural vegetation and wildlife? a) A country lacking in biodiversity cover b) One of the twelve mega biodiversity countries of the world c) The country with the greatest forest cover d) None of these 2. Which is not included in the group of non-flowering plants? a) Orchids b) Algae c) Fungi d) None of these 3. Natural vegetation refers to ........community. a) Plant b) Animal c) Human Being d) None of these 4. Plants of a particular region or a period are termed as : a) Vegetation b) Fauna c) Flora d) None of these 5. Which term is used for the original plant cover of an area which has grown naturally? a) Garden b) Agriculture c) Virgin Vegetation d) Indigenous Species 6. Which of the following is not a relief feature? a) Land b) Soil c) Water d) None Of These 7. Which of the following river does not forms the Northern Plains ? a) The Indus b) The Ganga c) The Brahmaputra d) The Gandak 8. Forest is which type of resource? a) Renewable resources b) Exhaustible resources c) Non-renewable resources d) None of these 9. What is the position of India in the world with regard to plant diversity? a) First b) Tenth c) Twelfth d) None of these 10. Which term is used for virgin vegetation, which have come from outside India are termed as ….. a) Indigenous plants b) Endemic species c) Exotic Plants d) None of these 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Biome Level Characterization (BLC) of Western India – a Geospatial Approach
    JOSHI et al. 213 Tropical Ecology 43(1): 213-228, 2002 ISSN 0564-3295 © International Society for Tropical Ecology Biome level characterization (BLC) of western India – a geospatial approach P.K. JOSHI, P.S. ROY, S. SINGH, S. AGARWAL & D. YADAV Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dehradun-248001, India Abstract: Environment is constantly changing as a function of climate and more recently due to human activities. Timely and accurate monitoring of these changes is a difficult task for regional planning and management. Up-to-date information on distribution and rate of changes of any ecosystem are required for a wide variety of applications viz., biome status, en- vironmental, climatic etc. Aerospace technology has been found to be a vital tool for assessment and monitoring of these natural resources. The present study focuses on the potential of IRS 1C WiFS data set for the regional level mapping. The temporal resolution along with the rec- ommended spatial and spectral resolution configures for the assessment of the phenological growth of the vegetation in the terrestrial ecosystems. The utilization of the climatic data along with the biogeographic map is proposed to delineate the biomes in the western Indian subcon- tinent. The product offers the basic input for the eco-physiological processes for studying the land surface interactions and conservation strategies of the arid regions. Resumen: El ambiente está en constante cambio en función del clima y más recientemente como consecuencia de las actividades humanas. El monitoreo preciso y oportuno de estos cam- bios es una tarea difícil para la planeación y el manejo de una región.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATION TYPES PART II. DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATIONS (v 2.0) Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (Federal Geographic Data Committee) 2012 Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, Dave Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Jean-Pierre Saucier, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer This document is being developed for the U.S. National Vegetation Classification, the International Vegetation Classification, and other national and international vegetation classifications. July 18, 2012 This report was produced by NVC partners (NatureServe, Ecological Society of America, U.S. federal agencies) through the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Printed from NatureServe Biotics on 24 Jul 2012 Citation: Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, C. Josse, A. Weakley, D. Tart, G. Navarro, B. Hoagland, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, G. Fults, E. Helmer. 2012. Classification and description of world formation types. Part I (Introduction) and Part II (Description of formation types, v2.0). Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, Federal Geographic Data Committee, FGDC Secretariat, U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA, and NatureServe, Arlington, VA. i Classification and Description of World Formation Types. Part II: Formation Descriptions, v2.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work produced here was supported by the U.S. National Vegetation Classification partnership between U.S. federal agencies, the Ecological Society of America, and NatureServe staff, working through the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Vegetation Subcommittee. FGDC sponsored the mandate of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, which included incorporating international expertise into the process. For that reason, this product represents a collaboration of national and international vegetation ecologists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brazilian Pampa: a Fragile Biome
    Diversity 2009, 1, 182-198; doi:10.3390/d1020182 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Review The Brazilian Pampa: A Fragile Biome Luiz Fernando Wurdig Roesch *, Frederico Costa Beber Vieira, Vilmar Alves Pereira, Adriano Luis Schünemann, Italo Filippi Teixeira, Ana Julia Teixeira Senna and Valdir Marcos Stefenon Universidade Federal do PAMPA-Campus São Gabriel. Av. Antonio Trilha, 1847-São Gabriel-RS-Zip: 97300-000, Brazil; E-Mails: [email protected] (F.C.B.V.); [email protected] (V.A.P); [email protected] (A.L.S.); [email protected] (I.F.T.); [email protected] (A.J.T.S); [email protected] (V.M.S.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-55-3232-6075; Fax: +55-55-3232-6075. Received: 17 November 2009 / Accepted: 9 December 2009 / Published: 21 December 2009 Abstract: Biodiversity is one of the most fundamental properties of Nature. It underpins the stability of ecosystems, provides vast bioresources for economic use, and has important cultural significance for many people. The Pampa biome, located in the southernmost state of Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, illustrates the direct and indirect interdependence of humans and biodiversity. The Brazilian Pampa lies within the South Temperate Zone where grasslands scattered with shrubs and trees are the dominant vegetation. The soil, originating from sedimentary rocks, often has an extremely sandy texture that makes them fragile—highly prone to water and wind erosion. Human activities have converted or degraded many areas of this biome. In this review we discuss our state-of-the-art knowledge of the diversity and the major biological features of this regions and the cultural factors that have shaped it.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Classifications of Forests the Task of Describing And
    Appendix D Classifications of Forests The task of describing and attempting to explain the wide plant forms. Grubb and others (1 963) even find using the diversity in forest ecosystems of the Tropics has occupied number of vegetative stories to be questionable in sepa- biologists, ecologists, and foresters for well over a rating types of tropical forests. They conclude that any century, attempt at a universal system of classification obscures as many truths as it reveals. Havel (1980) agrees that be- Temperate Zone scientists, comparing tropical with tem- cause of the great variety of physiognomic and environ- perate ecosystems, have concluded that the differences mental characteristics used to classify forests for various are generally only of degree. De Laubenfels (1975, p. 38) purposes, no one classification is best in all circum- states that "it cannot be fairly said that there is any kind stances. He points out that the description and classifica- of vegetative formation in the middle latitudes that can tion of forest types are still unsettled despite the recent be successfully segregated from corresponding tropical surge of interest in ordination, which, in contrast to clas- types. It is only possible to identify floristic divisions and sification, is primarily concerned with continuities and the unique features that separate any given plant or set of gradients, whether physiognomic or environmental. plants from any other." As two examples, tropical plants are frost sensitive, and temperate plants need variations Schimper's System in day length or temperature to complete their life In 1898, Schimper assembled what was then known cycles, about the general significance to plants of water, heat, light, air, soil, and animal life.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites DRAFT Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK July 2000 I >\~ l lUCN UNEP WCMC The World Conservation Union Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 Overview 1 2.0 Issues TO Consider 1 3.0 What IS Biodiversity? 2 4.0 Assessment methodology 3 5.0 Current World Heritage Sites 4 5.1 Criterion (IV) 4 5.2 World Heritage Sites IN Danger 4 5.3 Case Studies 5 6.0 Biogeographical Coverage 5 6.1 Udvardy Biogeographical Provinces 5 6.2 Bailey's Ecoregions 6 7.0 Key Prioritisation Programme Areas 6 7.1 WWF Global 200 Ecoregions 6 7.2 Centres of Plant Diversity (CPD) 6 7.3 Conservation International - Biodiversity Hotspots 7 7.4 Vavilov Centres of Plant Genetic Diversity 8 7.5 Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs) 8 8.0 Key Areas for Identified Species 9 8.1 Critically Endangered Taxa 9 8.2 Marine Turtles 9 9.0 Key Habitat Areas 1 9.1 Ramsar sites 11 9.2 Marine Biodiversity 1 9.3 Coral Reefs and Mangroves 1 10.0 Key Findings 12 11.0 Possible Future World Heritage Sites 13 12.0 Limitations of THE study 14 13.0 Conclusions AND Recommendations for Future Work 15 REFERENCES TABLES Table 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Rainforest Biome "The Land Is One Great, Wild, Untidy Luxuriant Hothouse, Made by Nature for Herself
    Tropical Rainforest Biome "The land is one great, wild, untidy luxuriant hothouse, made by Nature for herself . How great would be the desire in every admirer of Nature to behold, if such were possible, the scenery of another planet! . Yet to every person it may truly be said, that the glories of another world are opened to him" Charles Darwin in The Voyage of the Beagle Tropical Rainforest Biome "Never to have seen anthing but the temperate zone is to have lived on the fringe of the world" David Fairchild Tropical Rainforest Biome • equatorial lowlands and rainbelt; very short dry season • multi-layered, evergreen canopy, high species diversity • convergent adaptations around world, but different floras Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: 1. Equator to 10° or 25° N & S latitude and 0 - 1,000m elevation in Americas, Africa, SE Asia Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: 2. Along coasts windward to the trades — E. Brazil, Madagascar, NE Australia Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: 3. East coasts with orographic precipitation — E. Panama and Costa Rica, E. Puerto Rico Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: Seasonally dry tropical forests adjacent at higher latitudes or on leeward side of montane regions Tropical Rainforest Biome Three floristically diverse regions: 1. American: 50% of area 2. African: 20% 3. S.E. Asian - Pacific: 30% Tropical Rainforest Biome Fragmentation of rainforests — especially African and Asian — ongoing Tropical Rainforest Biome Relationships to other tropical forest systems — elevation gradient: Tropical montane or cloud
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Thornforest Conservation Plan
    Thornforest Conservation Plan A Tool to Help Guide Habitat Protection and Restoration in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas Developed by the Thornforest Conservation Partnership February 2020 Prepared by American Forests and The Conservation Fund Support for analysis provided by the Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation, James A. “Buddy” Davidson Foundation and Meadows Foundation. Thornforest Conservation Plan Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose of the Thornforest Conservation Partnership ............................................................................ 2 Purpose of this Document ........................................................................................................................ 2 The Importance of Thornforest Habitat.................................................................................................... 3 Conservation Planning in the Lower Rio Grande Valley ........................................................................... 5 Thornforest Conservation Plan Overview ................................................................................................. 6 Core Areas ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Corridors ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]