DOCSLIB.ORG

Biome Level Characterization (BLC) of Western India – a Geospatial Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biome Level Characterization (BLC) of Western India – a Geospatial Approach JOSHI et al. 213 Tropical Ecology 43(1): 213-228, 2002 ISSN 0564-3295 © International Society for Tropical Ecology Biome level characterization (BLC) of western India – a geospatial approach P.K. JOSHI, P.S. ROY, S. SINGH, S. AGARWAL & D. YADAV Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dehradun-248001, India Abstract: Environment is constantly changing as a function of climate and more recently due to human activities. Timely and accurate monitoring of these changes is a difficult task for regional planning and management. Up-to-date information on distribution and rate of changes of any ecosystem are required for a wide variety of applications viz., biome status, en- vironmental, climatic etc. Aerospace technology has been found to be a vital tool for assessment and monitoring of these natural resources. The present study focuses on the potential of IRS 1C WiFS data set for the regional level mapping. The temporal resolution along with the rec- ommended spatial and spectral resolution configures for the assessment of the phenological growth of the vegetation in the terrestrial ecosystems. The utilization of the climatic data along with the biogeographic map is proposed to delineate the biomes in the western Indian subcon- tinent. The product offers the basic input for the eco-physiological processes for studying the land surface interactions and conservation strategies of the arid regions. Resumen: El ambiente está en constante cambio en función del clima y más recientemente como consecuencia de las actividades humanas. El monitoreo preciso y oportuno de estos cam- bios es una tarea difícil para la planeación y el manejo de una región. Se requiere información actualizada sobre la distribución y las tasas de cambio de cualquier ecosistema para una am- plia variedad de aplicaciones, por ejemplo las referentes a la condición del bioma, las ambien- tales, las climáticas, etc. La tecnología aeroespacial es una herramienta vital para la evalua- ción y el seguimiento temporal de estos recursos naturales. El presente estudio se enfoca en el potencial que tienen los datos IRS 1C WiFS para la elaboración de mapas regionales. La re- solución temporal, así como las resoluciones espacial y espectral recomendadas, se configuran para evaluar el crecimiento fenológico de la vegetación en los ecosistemas terrestres. Se pro- pone el uso de datos climáticos junto con el mapa biogeográfico para delimitar los biomas de la porción occidental del subcontinente indio. El producto ofrece los insumos básicos sobre procesos ecofisiológicos para el estudio de las interacciones de la superficie terrestre y las es- trategias de conservación de las regiones áridas. Resumo: O ambiente está mudando constantemente em função do clima e, mais recente- mente, devido às actividades humanas. A monitorização tempestiva, e exacta, destas mudanças é uma tarefa difícil para o planeamento regional e a gestão. Informação actualizada quanto á distribuição e taxas de mudança de qualquer ecossistema é necessária para um conjunto variado de aplicações como sejam o status do bioma, o ambiente, clima, etc.. A tecnologia aeroespacial tem-se mostrado uma ferramenta vital para a avaliação e monitorização destes re- cursos naturais. Este estudo foca o potencial do conjunto de dados obtidos pelo IRS 1C WiFS para o mapeamento a nível regional. A resolução temporal, a par com a resolução espacial e es- pectral recomendada, mostra-se adequada para a avaliação do crescimento fenológico da vege- tação nos ecossistemas terrestres. A utilização dos dados climáticos, juntamente com o mapa biogeográfico, é proposta para o delimitar os biomas na parte ocidental do subcontinente in- Address for Correspondence: P.K. Joshi, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, 4, Kalidas Road, P.O. Box – 135, Dehradun 248 001, India; Tel: +91-135-744583; Fax: +91-135-741987; e-mail: [email protected] 214 BIOME LEVEL CHARACTERISATION diano. O produto oferece o input básico para o estudo dos processos ecofisiológicos, das in- teracções com a supercície do solo e para as estratégias de conservação das regiões áridas. Key words: Biome level characterization, geospatial approach, green wave, land use/cover, phenology, remote sensing, western India. Introduction general temperature range and precipitation level, we can predict what kind of biological community In nature, there exists a complex of more than is likely to develop on a particular site if that site one community. Communities are never stable, but is free of disturbance for a sufficient time. Biome dynamic. Although a typical community maintains distribution also is influenced by the prevailing itself more or less in equilibrium with the prevail- landforms of an area. Mountains, in particular, ing conditions of the environment, but in nature exert major influences on biological communities. this is hardly true. They are never found perma- Furthermore, with the human population ris- nently in complete balance with their component ing by almost a billion a decade, over the next species or with the physical environment. Envi- three decades at least sustained increases in food ronment always keeps on changing over a period of production is required. According to the projections time due to variations in climate and physiography from the Integrated Model for Assessment of the and the activities of the species of the communities Greenhouse Effect (IMAGE model: Alcamo 1994) themselves. These influences bring about marked and from other analysis, this will result both in changes in the dominants of the existing commu- further conversion of natural ecosystems to agri- nity, which is thus sooner or later replaced by an- culture. Both of these processes always accelerate other community at the same place. This process the release of carbon in the atmosphere. In addi- continues and successive communities develop one tion, as more land is converted to agriculture, after the other over the same area until the termi- there is less area of natural ecosystems available nal final community again becomes more or less to act as carbon-sink; thereby, reducing the poten- stable for a period of time. This occurrence of rela- tial sink strength of the terrestrial biosphere. tively definite sequence of communities over a pe- Changes in the composition and structure of eco- riod of time in the same area is known as Ecologi- systems are driven by a combination of manage- cal Succession. Thereafter, a concept of biome, de- ment practices and changes in climate and atmos- fining as ‘biotic community of geographical extent pheric composition. Hence it makes the assess- characterized by distinctiveness in the life forms of ment of natural resources, changes in the ecosys- the important climax species’ came up (Sharma tem so important to incorporate that new arriving 1997). The biome is not based on the species of policies and strategies would not hinder the bio- plants and animals present but rather on the life spheric activities rather would allow it to flow on forms of the most important plants (i.e. trees, sustainable basis. shrubs, grasses) that give to the landscape its spe- cial character. The chief character of a biome is Present knowledge on biomes depicted by climax communities with their domi- The emergence of biome or ecoregional level nant life forms. Thus a biome is viewed, as a biotic studies is an important step in dealing with diffi- community – a unit larger than a community, con- cult natural resource issues. Ecoregional studies stituting the great regions of the world distin- have distinctive emphasis on interaction between guished on an ecological basis, such as tundra bi- development and conservation, including biological omes, forest biomes, grasslands, deserts etc. and physical resources. The study requires both Temperature and precipitation are among the greater depth of understanding of interactions of most important determinants in biome distribu- humans and ecosystems and more focus on imme- tion along with the topography. If we know the diate social needs. Nevertheless this has grown in JOSHI et al. 215 part by efforts to fill a critical gap in dealing such The wide field of view of the AVHRR provides problems by scaling our understanding from local large-area coverage but involves considerable diffi- to global and how human activities interact with culty in the collection of ground data for valida- the atmosphere. tion. Results of measurement of primary produc- Last decade has been a uniquely productive tion using a harvest technique are described by era for mapping and modeling of earth’s surface Diallo et al. (1991), as the results from the applica- with roots in bioregional sciences, such as biogeog- tion of slightly different methods in Niger that raphy, regional economics of natural resources etc. were suitable for the more extensive and uniform and contemporarily having substantial improve- terrain in the study region (Wylie et al. 1991). ments in computing technologies and also in our These field methods rely maximum on the above- understanding of global and regional systems and ground standing annual vegetation as the estimate the availability of improved earth science data of seasonal production and, therefore, are subject sets. This is clearly articulated by the Interna- to some well-known sources of error (Beadle et al. tional Geosphere Biosphere Program (IGBP) core 1985). However, they are capable of estimating net projects on Biospheric Aspects of the Hydrological production in large areas (in excess of 10 km2) as Cycle (BAHC), Global Change and Terrestrial Eco- is necessary for analysis of the AVHRR data. The systems (GCTE), International Global Atmos- use of AVHRR NDVI data to model regional pri- pheric Chemistry (IGAC), Land-Use and Land mary production is discussed by Prince (1991), in Cover Change (LUCC), Global Analysis, Interpre- which the subject of scale is addressed and rele- tation and Modeling (GAIM), Land-Ocean Interac- vant variables are identified at the regional scale. tions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ), Past Global Factors that obscure the relationship between the Changes (PAGES) etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd revised edition, January 2009 Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Report prepared by: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Network World Resources Institute (WRI) Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy (IFP) University of Freiburg Freiburg University Press 2nd revised edition, January 2009 The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world's foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation since 1989, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. Its core business is managing data about ecosystems and biodiversity, interpreting and analysing that data to provide assessments and policy analysis, and making the results
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK November 2000 Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 ISSUES TO CONSIDER....................................................................................................................................1 3.0 WHAT IS BIODIVERSITY?..............................................................................................................................2 4.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................3 5.0 CURRENT WORLD HERITAGE SITES............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation And
    CLASS 9th SUBJECT: GEOGRAPHY CHAPTER 5: NATURAL VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. India belongs to which of the following categories according to natural vegetation and wildlife? a) A country lacking in biodiversity cover b) One of the twelve mega biodiversity countries of the world c) The country with the greatest forest cover d) None of these 2. Which is not included in the group of non-flowering plants? a) Orchids b) Algae c) Fungi d) None of these 3. Natural vegetation refers to ........community. a) Plant b) Animal c) Human Being d) None of these 4. Plants of a particular region or a period are termed as : a) Vegetation b) Fauna c) Flora d) None of these 5. Which term is used for the original plant cover of an area which has grown naturally? a) Garden b) Agriculture c) Virgin Vegetation d) Indigenous Species 6. Which of the following is not a relief feature? a) Land b) Soil c) Water d) None Of These 7. Which of the following river does not forms the Northern Plains ? a) The Indus b) The Ganga c) The Brahmaputra d) The Gandak 8. Forest is which type of resource? a) Renewable resources b) Exhaustible resources c) Non-renewable resources d) None of these 9. What is the position of India in the world with regard to plant diversity? a) First b) Tenth c) Twelfth d) None of these 10. Which term is used for virgin vegetation, which have come from outside India are termed as ….. a) Indigenous plants b) Endemic species c) Exotic Plants d) None of these 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler-Wolf, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATION TYPES PART II. DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATIONS (v 2.0) Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (Federal Geographic Data Committee) 2012 Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, Dave Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Jean-Pierre Saucier, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer This document is being developed for the U.S. National Vegetation Classification, the International Vegetation Classification, and other national and international vegetation classifications. July 18, 2012 This report was produced by NVC partners (NatureServe, Ecological Society of America, U.S. federal agencies) through the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Printed from NatureServe Biotics on 24 Jul 2012 Citation: Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, C. Josse, A. Weakley, D. Tart, G. Navarro, B. Hoagland, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, G. Fults, E. Helmer. 2012. Classification and description of world formation types. Part I (Introduction) and Part II (Description of formation types, v2.0). Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, Federal Geographic Data Committee, FGDC Secretariat, U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA, and NatureServe, Arlington, VA. i Classification and Description of World Formation Types. Part II: Formation Descriptions, v2.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work produced here was supported by the U.S. National Vegetation Classification partnership between U.S. federal agencies, the Ecological Society of America, and NatureServe staff, working through the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Vegetation Subcommittee. FGDC sponsored the mandate of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, which included incorporating international expertise into the process. For that reason, this product represents a collaboration of national and international vegetation ecologists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brazilian Pampa: a Fragile Biome
    Diversity 2009, 1, 182-198; doi:10.3390/d1020182 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Review The Brazilian Pampa: A Fragile Biome Luiz Fernando Wurdig Roesch *, Frederico Costa Beber Vieira, Vilmar Alves Pereira, Adriano Luis Schünemann, Italo Filippi Teixeira, Ana Julia Teixeira Senna and Valdir Marcos Stefenon Universidade Federal do PAMPA-Campus São Gabriel. Av. Antonio Trilha, 1847-São Gabriel-RS-Zip: 97300-000, Brazil; E-Mails: [email protected] (F.C.B.V.); [email protected] (V.A.P); [email protected] (A.L.S.); [email protected] (I.F.T.); [email protected] (A.J.T.S); [email protected] (V.M.S.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-55-3232-6075; Fax: +55-55-3232-6075. Received: 17 November 2009 / Accepted: 9 December 2009 / Published: 21 December 2009 Abstract: Biodiversity is one of the most fundamental properties of Nature. It underpins the stability of ecosystems, provides vast bioresources for economic use, and has important cultural significance for many people. The Pampa biome, located in the southernmost state of Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, illustrates the direct and indirect interdependence of humans and biodiversity. The Brazilian Pampa lies within the South Temperate Zone where grasslands scattered with shrubs and trees are the dominant vegetation. The soil, originating from sedimentary rocks, often has an extremely sandy texture that makes them fragile—highly prone to water and wind erosion. Human activities have converted or degraded many areas of this biome. In this review we discuss our state-of-the-art knowledge of the diversity and the major biological features of this regions and the cultural factors that have shaped it.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Classifications of Forests the Task of Describing And
    Appendix D Classifications of Forests The task of describing and attempting to explain the wide plant forms. Grubb and others (1 963) even find using the diversity in forest ecosystems of the Tropics has occupied number of vegetative stories to be questionable in sepa- biologists, ecologists, and foresters for well over a rating types of tropical forests. They conclude that any century, attempt at a universal system of classification obscures as many truths as it reveals. Havel (1980) agrees that be- Temperate Zone scientists, comparing tropical with tem- cause of the great variety of physiognomic and environ- perate ecosystems, have concluded that the differences mental characteristics used to classify forests for various are generally only of degree. De Laubenfels (1975, p. 38) purposes, no one classification is best in all circum- states that "it cannot be fairly said that there is any kind stances. He points out that the description and classifica- of vegetative formation in the middle latitudes that can tion of forest types are still unsettled despite the recent be successfully segregated from corresponding tropical surge of interest in ordination, which, in contrast to clas- types. It is only possible to identify floristic divisions and sification, is primarily concerned with continuities and the unique features that separate any given plant or set of gradients, whether physiognomic or environmental. plants from any other." As two examples, tropical plants are frost sensitive, and temperate plants need variations Schimper's System in day length or temperature to complete their life In 1898, Schimper assembled what was then known cycles, about the general significance to plants of water, heat, light, air, soil, and animal life.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    United States Department of Agriculture Classification and Description of World Formation Types Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, David Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-346 August 2016 Faber-Langendoen, D.; Keeler, T.; Meidinger, D.; Josse, C.; Weakley, A.; Tart, D.; Navarro, G.; Hoagland, B.; Ponomarenko, S.; Fults, G.; Helmer, E. 2016. Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 222 p. Abstract An ecological vegetation classification approach has been developed in which a combi- nation of vegetation attributes (physiognomy, structure, and floristics) and their response to ecological and biogeographic factors are used as the basis for classifying vegetation types. This approach can help support international, national, and subnational classifica- tion efforts. The classification structure was largely developed by the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (HRWG), which contained members from across the Americas. The HRWG was authorized by the U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to devel- op a revised global vegetation classification to replace the earlier versions of the structure that guided the U.S. National Vegetation Classification and International Vegetation Classification, which formerly relied on the UNESCO (1973) global classification (see FGDC 1997; Grossman and others 1998). This document summarizes the develop- ment of the upper formation levels. We first describe the history of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group and discuss the three main parameters that guide the clas- sification—it focuses on vegetated parts of the globe, on existing vegetation, and includes (but distinguishes) both cultural and natural vegetation for which parallel hierarchies are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Overview of Protected Areas on the World Heritage List of Particular Importance for Biodiversity
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE FOR BIODIVERSITY A contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites DRAFT Text and Tables compiled by Gemma Smith and Janina Jakubowska Maps compiled by Ian May UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK July 2000 I >\~ l lUCN UNEP WCMC The World Conservation Union Disclaimer: The contents of this report and associated maps do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP-WCMC or contributory organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.0 Overview 1 2.0 Issues TO Consider 1 3.0 What IS Biodiversity? 2 4.0 Assessment methodology 3 5.0 Current World Heritage Sites 4 5.1 Criterion (IV) 4 5.2 World Heritage Sites IN Danger 4 5.3 Case Studies 5 6.0 Biogeographical Coverage 5 6.1 Udvardy Biogeographical Provinces 5 6.2 Bailey's Ecoregions 6 7.0 Key Prioritisation Programme Areas 6 7.1 WWF Global 200 Ecoregions 6 7.2 Centres of Plant Diversity (CPD) 6 7.3 Conservation International - Biodiversity Hotspots 7 7.4 Vavilov Centres of Plant Genetic Diversity 8 7.5 Endemic Bird Areas (EBAs) 8 8.0 Key Areas for Identified Species 9 8.1 Critically Endangered Taxa 9 8.2 Marine Turtles 9 9.0 Key Habitat Areas 1 9.1 Ramsar sites 11 9.2 Marine Biodiversity 1 9.3 Coral Reefs and Mangroves 1 10.0 Key Findings 12 11.0 Possible Future World Heritage Sites 13 12.0 Limitations of THE study 14 13.0 Conclusions AND Recommendations for Future Work 15 REFERENCES TABLES Table 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Rainforest Biome "The Land Is One Great, Wild, Untidy Luxuriant Hothouse, Made by Nature for Herself
    Tropical Rainforest Biome "The land is one great, wild, untidy luxuriant hothouse, made by Nature for herself . How great would be the desire in every admirer of Nature to behold, if such were possible, the scenery of another planet! . Yet to every person it may truly be said, that the glories of another world are opened to him" Charles Darwin in The Voyage of the Beagle Tropical Rainforest Biome "Never to have seen anthing but the temperate zone is to have lived on the fringe of the world" David Fairchild Tropical Rainforest Biome • equatorial lowlands and rainbelt; very short dry season • multi-layered, evergreen canopy, high species diversity • convergent adaptations around world, but different floras Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: 1. Equator to 10° or 25° N & S latitude and 0 - 1,000m elevation in Americas, Africa, SE Asia Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: 2. Along coasts windward to the trades — E. Brazil, Madagascar, NE Australia Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: 3. East coasts with orographic precipitation — E. Panama and Costa Rica, E. Puerto Rico Tropical Rainforest Biome Location: Seasonally dry tropical forests adjacent at higher latitudes or on leeward side of montane regions Tropical Rainforest Biome Three floristically diverse regions: 1. American: 50% of area 2. African: 20% 3. S.E. Asian - Pacific: 30% Tropical Rainforest Biome Fragmentation of rainforests — especially African and Asian — ongoing Tropical Rainforest Biome Relationships to other tropical forest systems — elevation gradient: Tropical montane or cloud
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Thornforest Conservation Plan
    Thornforest Conservation Plan A Tool to Help Guide Habitat Protection and Restoration in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas Developed by the Thornforest Conservation Partnership February 2020 Prepared by American Forests and The Conservation Fund Support for analysis provided by the Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation, James A. “Buddy” Davidson Foundation and Meadows Foundation. Thornforest Conservation Plan Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose of the Thornforest Conservation Partnership ............................................................................ 2 Purpose of this Document ........................................................................................................................ 2 The Importance of Thornforest Habitat.................................................................................................... 3 Conservation Planning in the Lower Rio Grande Valley ........................................................................... 5 Thornforest Conservation Plan Overview ................................................................................................. 6 Core Areas ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Corridors ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Core Paper – Iii Ecology and Plant Geography
    1st BSC BOTANY 18BBO24C - CORE PAPER – III ECOLOGY AND PLANT GEOGRAPHY UNIT – V Plant geography and forestry: Principles of plant geography – Phytogeographical regions in India. Distribution types – continuous, discontinuous and endemic. Continental drift. Vegetation mapping, GIS and its application in forestry. Vegetation types - Rain forest, Deciduous forest, Mangrove forest and Scrub jungle. Minor forest produce. Agroforestry and Social forestry. Phytogeography Topics: • Principles • History • Description of earth • Theory of tolerance • Endemism • Brief description of major terrestrial biomes (sp. Tropical, temperate and tundra) • Phytogeographical divisions of India • Vegetation of Delhi Phytogeography or plant geography deals with the geographical distribution of plants on earth. Phytogeography is defined by Good (1964) as ‘that branch of botany that deals with the spatial relationships of plants both in the present and the past’. Plant ecology + phytogeography= geobotany In systematics plants are grouped into taxa. In ecology…………………….into communities etc In phytogeography………..into phytochoria. • Phytochoria are natural floristic areas that broadly correspond to climatic types, and are based on the total number of species with the same concentric distribution pattern. • A phytochorion, in phytogeography, is a geographic area with a relatively uniform composition of plant species. Adjacent phytochoria do not usually have a sharp boundary, but rather a soft one, a transitional area in which many species from both regions overlap. The region of overlap is called a vegetation tension zone. • Earliest definition was given by Schouw (1823) he divided the earths surface into 25 kingdoms represented by geographical areas named after their most characteristic plants. • Eg Kingdom of Saxifrages and mosses (Alpine Arctic) • Eg Kingdom of Umbelliferae and Cruciferae (Eurasia); it was further divided into provinces.
    [Show full text]