DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution of Front Ends for Satellite Communications in Ka- Band

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution of Front Ends for Satellite Communications in Ka- Band Evolution of Front Ends for Satellite Communications in Ka- band J. Fikart IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Evolution of Front Ends: Outline Part 1: Satellite Communications: Why Ka- band? Part 2: “Generic” Satcom Systems with Fixed Terminals Part 3: Front End for ASTRA SITs Part 4: Ka-band Portable Terminal Part 5: Ka-band Challenges and Trends 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Part 1: Satellite Communications: Why Ka- band? IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Outline 1. Satellite bands for DTH TV, VSATs 2. Ka-Band Pros and Cons 3. Historical Overview X The beginnings X First Satellites X “Newer” Satellites X Local contribution 4. New Ka-Band Satellite Systems ¾ Recent Ka-Band Satellite Launches 5. Conclusions 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Satellite bands for DTH TV, VSATs Ka, Ku- and C- bands : X C: Rx = 3.7 – 4.2 GHz Tx = 5.925 – 6.425 GHz X Ku: Rx = 10.75 – 12.75 GHz with sub-bands Tx = 14.0 – 14.5 GHz (extended to 13.75 GHz) X Ka: Rx = 19.2-20.2 GHz Eu & US 20.405 –21.105 GHz Asia (Korea) Tx = 29-30 GHz Eu & US 30.135 - 30.835 GHz Asia (Korea) Most often used Ka Rx/Tx = 19.7-20.2/29.5-30 GHz 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Ka-Band Pros and Cons X Larger effective bandwidth Higher frequency = smaller wavelength = smaller satellite footprint = many spot beams = frequency re-use Example: Typical 500 MHz allocation in a satellite payload is effectively multiplied 4 -10 times through polarization and frequency reuse using spot beam geographical coverage. X Higher satellite EIRP for same power, antenna size X Smaller ground terminal VSAT antenna diameters X Reduced interference, fewer regulatory restrictions. X New satellites, some with OBP 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Pros and Cons: narrow beams P = Power received R Earth PT = Power transmitted PR GTxA = Gain of Tx antenna Rx Ku R = distance (sat. to earth) f(Ku)=11 GHz Ka A A = area of Rx antenna RxA RxA f(Ka)=19 GHz GTxA PT R Rx power in Ka ≈ 3 x Rx power in Ku SAT Tx 1 π 2 DDf2 π 2 2 2 PPG===A and G η AAη R T TxA4πR 2 RxA TxA λ2 c2 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Pros and Cons: Polarization E CAL I RT E V RHCP ANT ANT HORI- LHCP E ZONTAL ANT Linear ANT Circular 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Pros and Cons: Spot beams (e.g.- US) Example: 2 frequency bands and 2 polarizations 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Pros and Cons: Effects of weather Main propagation and antenna effects: XPath loss due to rain and cloud attenuation Depends on location:more loss in heavy rain regions vs. “misty” rain locations. Also, loss increases with frequency (Ka 5 dB > Ku!). XDe-polarization due to ice crystals in clouds hence cross-polarization interference. XAntenna wetting, particularly wet feed. This must be taken into account in overall system design (larger antennas, Tx power). 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Pros and Cons:Rain fade countermeasures The following mitigating techniques can be used: X Site diversity for gateways X On-board ALC for forward link X Higher satellite EIRP for forward link X Uplink Power Control in terminals & gateways X Larger user antennas for critical applications X Advanced modems with variable bit rate and code rate (slow down during fade!) X Antennas less susceptible to wetting loss This, combined with Ka-band advantages and less stringent availability requirements, enables the use of Ka-band for satellite communications. 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Historical Overview: The beginnings Demand for wide-band services started to be evident in the late 1970’s NASA, NASDA (Japan), ESA and ASI Space Agencies started to pioneer Ka-band Wide total bandwidth but slow going initially due to: X large rain attenuation X Cost of providing high-availability commercial services Then emphasis changed to Direct-to-User (DTU) services with less stringent availability requirements Ä Era of broadband satellite communications capable of linking users around the world has opened 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Historical Overview: First Ka Satellites The following were the first satellites, used mostly for experimental purposes (propagation, earth station hardware, various types of traffic etc.) X ETS-II: Japan, 1977 X Olympus: Europe (ESA), 1989 X Kopernikus: Germany, 1990 The above were “bent-pipe” types. The next two below had OBP (On-Board Processing): X Italsat: Italy (ASI), 1991 X ACTS: USA (NASA), 1993 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Historical Overview: “Newer” Ka Satellites By 2001, several “commercial” satellites with a Ka- Band payload were (and are still now) in service: Italsat F2 has been used in trials involving a university network as well as some telephony backhaul services within the European continent. KoreaSat 3 has been used for a Distance – Education network. Astra’s 1H satellite has been used as part of the AstraNet Return Channel System (ARCS) later re-named BroadBand Initiative (BBI) for Multimedia applications. 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Historical Overview: Local Projects (MPR Teltech, IMT ComSys, NORSAT) X Picoterminal (MPR, 1993 – 1996, with ESA): First Ka-band (30/20 GHz) briefcase terminal X VSAT terminal (IMT, 1995-1998, with ESA): 30/20 GHz, up to 2Mb/s, 1.5m antenna X SIT (Satellite Interactive Terminal) ODUs (NORSAT, 1998- 2002) for ASTRA’s BBI for Multimedia: 30/12 GHz, 128-2000 kb/s,75-120 cm X Trial ODU for the IMMIS system (1998- 2002) NORSAT partnered up with Alenia Spazio. X ODUs for Korea Telecom Distance education network: 30/20 GHz, up to 2Mb/s,120 cm ant. 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 New Ka-Band Satellite Systems/Projects As of 2001, there were many industry announcements for new satellites that would include Ka-Band communications payloads and these were expected to be launched in the period of early 2002 to end of 2004. X Of these, there were several satellites already under construction that could be considered probable to succeed. 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Ka-Band Satellite Launches Plans: 2001 WildBlue 1 Launch 109.2 or 118.7° WL North America GE Star 1&2, NIMIQ 2 Launch 91° WL Telstar 8 ASTRA 1K Launch 19.2 ° EL North America Europe TELEDESIC Launch (LEO x 288) SpaceWay Global Launch 99 and 101 ° WL ANIK F2 Launch 111.1° WL Assessment North America date Today Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2001 2002 2003 2004 Echostar 9 Launch IPSTAR Launch EuroSkyWay Launch 16.4° EL 121° WL 120° EL Europe North America N&S Asia Planned Ka-Band Satelltie ITALSAT F2 16.4° EL HOTBIRD 6 Launch 13° EL Eutelsat W3A Launch 7° EL Launch Schedule Window Europe Europe Europe ASTRA 1H 19.2° EL In Service Europe KOREASAT 3 113° EL NSS 6 Launch 95° EL Highly Probable Europe N&S Asia Probability Unkown 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Ka-Band Satellite Launches: 2004 WildBlue 1 Launch 109.2 or 118.7° WL North America GE Star 1&2, NIMIQ 2 Launch 91° WL Telstar 8 ASTRA 1K Launch 19.2 ° EL North America Europe TELEDESIC Launch (LEO x 288) SpaceWay Global Launch 99 and 101 ° WL ANIK F2 Launch 111.1° WL North America Q2 Today X Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 05 2001 2002 2003 2004 Q1 Echostar 9 Launch IPSTAR Launch EuroSkyWay Launch 16.4° EL 121° WL 120° EL Europe North America N&S Asia Planned Ka-Band Satelltie ITALSAT F2 16.4° EL HOTBIRD 6 Launch 13° EL Eutelsat W3A Launch 7° EL Launch Schedule Window Europe Europe Europe ASTRA 1H 19.2° EL In Service Europe KOREASAT 3 113° EL NSS 6 Launch 95° EL Highly Probable Europe N&S Asia Probability Unkown 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Conclusions X Ka-band systems could provide up to 10 Gb/s throughput compared to 1Gb/s in Ku-band X Speeds of 10 Mb/s up, 100 Mb/s down possible X OBP in satellites will enable mesh connectivity X Less interference & fewer regulatory problems X Rain fades require more margin in link budgets ≈ 5 dB more than in Ku-band for 99% availability Mitigation techniques such as higher satellite EIRP, uplink power control and variable bit rate modems in terminals may have to be used Pay attention to antenna wetting (keep feed dry) X Smaller antennas ¨ smaller portables 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Conclusions In Ka-band, this is possible! 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Part 2: “Generic” Satcom Systems with fixed terminals 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 Outline General overview Network Configuration Earth station subsystems:ODU, IDU, IFL Description of ODU components • Complete ODU • Antennas, feeds, OMT/diplexers • Transceivers Specific example Korea Telecom Project (KoreaSat III) 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 General: Satellite Network Configuration Ka Band/Ku Band Payload 30 GHz R et ur n C ha R nn e el External Networks tu rn C h an u n R K d e u e n l K d t a z n u User Terminal a r B HB n B V 2 d C D G te G h E s a a Service/Content n c l z 0 n MP d aH Provider e a n 3 z l o igG r S Ku Band H B 0 Tx Front-End 2 G 0 User Terminal 2 Ka Band User Terminal HUB Ka Band Rx Front-End Star Network Example 1/10/2005 IEEE ComSoc Presentation 10 Jan 2005 General: Earth Station & its Subsystems Audio Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thales Alenia Space Experience on Plasma Propulsion
    Thales Alenia Space Experience on Plasma Propulsion IEPC-2007-301 Presented at the 30th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Florence, Italy September 17-20, 2007 Michel LYSZYK* and Laurent LECARDONNEL.† Thales Alenia Space, Cannes, 06150, France Abstract: Thales Alenia Space experience on plasma propulsion has been developed in the frame of Stentor, Astra 1K and GEI programs with plasma propulsion systems using SPT100 thrusters manufactured by Fakel and commercialized by Snecma . The PPS (plasma propulsion system) use in house equipments such as Power Processing Unit (PPU) manufactured by TAS-ETCA in Charleroi and the Thruster Orientation Mechanism (TOM) manufactured by TAS-France in Cannes . The PPS subsystem is used on board our SpaceBus satellite family to perform North-South station keeping. The on going activity on the XPS (Xenon Propulsion System) is devoted to the next European platform Alphabus currently under joint development by Thales Alenia Space and Astrium with CNES and ESA support. The XPS uses also the PPU manufactured by TAS-ETCA , the TOM manufactured by TAS-France and the Xe tank developed by TAS-Italy ; it use also the PPS1350 thruster under qualification by Snecma , a xenon regulator and a latch valve under development at Marotta Ireland. I. Introduction HIS document describes the Thales Alenia Space experience gained through Stentor , Astra 1K , GEI, T Spacebus and Alphabus programs on plasma Hall effect thrusters propulsion subsystems . For Spacebus application a description of the subsystem is given together with the general achieved performances . For Alphabus application a general status of the on going activities is given . * Head of electric propulsion section, Propulsion Department, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • SES Beam Magazine
    BEAM MAGAZINE No. 01 | 2012 SATELLITES AND THE MEDIA The opportunities arising from ever-changing consumer demands TAKING THE LEAD Benefi tting from the varying markets of Europe EMERGING AUDIENCES The informed and increasingly a uent viewers of Asia TRANSMITTING MEDIA INNOVATION Keeping pace with the explosion in consumer devices EDITORIAL | BEAM NO. 01 STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIPS DEAR READER, Partnering with our customers in order to support their de ve l- We are pushing for exciting, innovative satellite services and opment and growth plans: this is the core concept that drives our applications. Earlier this year, we unveiled SAT>IP: this ground- commitment to customer service. breaking technology allows satellite signals to be distributed in SES operates one of the world’s finest telecommunications the IP protocol to tablet computers, PCs and other smart devices. satellite fleets. With 51 satellites and a coverage area of 99% of the SAT>IP allows for mobile satellite reception on multiple screens world’s population, SES provides a major link in the global com- in the home. It represents a true breakthrough. And we are munications chain. moving closer to the launch of the O3b Networks constellation, This fleet, now featuring more than 1,400 transponders, is the which SES supports as a major strategic shareholder. This innova- world’s leading media broadcasting platform via satellite. Today, tive new medium earth orbit satellite system will provide highly we transmit more than 5,800 TV and radio channels – more than competitive high throughput broadband capacity for trunking, any other satellite system. Our spacecraft carry more than mobile backhaul and satellite applications in the maritime as 1,300 HDTV channels and our attractive satellite neighbour- well as the oil and gas sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunikation Satellites: the Actual Situation and Potential Future Developments
    Telecommunikation Satellites: The Actual Situation and Potential Future Developments Dr. Manfred Wittig Head of Multimedia Systems Section D-APP/TSM ESTEC NL 2200 AG Noordwijk [email protected] March 2003 Commercial Satellite Contracts 25 20 15 Europe US 10 5 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 European Average 5 Satellites/Year US Average 18 Satellites/Year Estimation of cumulative value chain for the Global commercial market 1998-2007 in BEuro 35 27 100% 135 90% 80% 225 Spacecraft Manufacturing 70% Launch 60% Operations Ground Segment 50% Services 40% 365 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 Consolidated Turnover of European Industry Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders 2000 30 2001 25 2002 3 (7) Firm Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2002 Manufacturer Customer Satellite Astrium Hispasat SA Amazonas (Spain) Boeing Thuraya Satellite Thuraya 3 Telecommunications Co (U.A.E.) Orbital Science PT Telekommunikasi Telkom-2 Indonesia Hangar Queens or White Tails Orders in 2002 for Bargain Prices of already contracted Satellites Manufacturer Customer Satellite Alcatel Space New Indian Operator Agrani (India) Alcatel Space Eutelsat W5 (France) (1998 completed) Astrium Hellas-Sat Hellas Sat Consortium Ltd. (Greece-Cyprus) Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2003 Manufacturer Customer Satellite Astrium Telesat Anik F1R 4.2.2003 (Canada) Planned Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2003 SES GLOBAL Three RFQ’s: SES Americom ASTRA 1L ASTRA 1K cancelled four orders with Alcatel Space in 2001 INTELSAT Launched five satellites in the last 13 month average fleet age: 11 Years of remaining life PanAmSat No orders expected Concentration on cash flow generation Eutelsat HB 7A HB 8 expected at the end of 2003 Telesat Ordered Anik F1R from Astrium Planned Commercial Telecom Satellite Orders in 2003 Arabsat & are expected to replace Spacebus 300 Shin Satellite (solar-array steering problems) Korea Telecom Negotiation with Alcatel Space for Koreasat Binariang Sat.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Processing Unit Activities at Thales Alenia Space Belgium (ETCA)
    Power Processing Unit Activities at Thales Alenia Space Belgium (ETCA) IEPC-2013-213 Presented at the 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, The George Washington University • Washington, D.C. • USA October 6 – 10, 2013 Eric Bourguignon1, Stéphane Fraselle2 and Thierry Scalais3 Thales Alenia Space Belgium (ETCA), B-6032 Charleroi, Belgium Abstract: Since 1996, Thales Alenia Space Belgium (ETCA) designs, develops and produces Power Processing Unit (PPU) to supply Hall Effect Thrusters: SPT-100 from Fakel and PPS1350-G from Snecma. The first qualification model, developed for the 50V bus Stentor program, has supplied during 8900 hours an SPT-100 thruster in a vacuum chamber simulating space environment. Qualified for the SpaceBus 4000 platform, with a 100V regulated bus, the SB4000 PPU and Filter Unit EQM have cumulated 6300 hours ground operation with a PPS1350-G thruster. Twenty three PPU flight models were delivered for the Stentor, Astra-1K, Smart-1, Intelsat, Inmarsat, Eutelsat, Yahsat satellites. In October 2005, the Smart-1 spacecraft reached the Moon after 4958 hours of cumulated operation of the PPU and its PPS1350-G thruster. Fourteen PPU’s currently in flight for North South Station Keeping on seven telecom satellites have cumulated more than 20900 hours flight operation. Following the selection of the PPS1350-G as baseline thruster for the AlphaBus platform, the AlphaBus PPU was developed and two flight models were delivered for AlphaSat, launched in July 2013. The flight validation of the AlphaBus electrical propulsion has been performed successfully in August 2013. On the SmallGEO platform, one EPTA branch has to drive one out of four SPT-100 thrusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Mission Planner's Guide (PMPG)
    Proton Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide APPENDIX A Proton Launch System Description and History Proton Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, LKEB-9812-1990 Revision 7, July 2009 A. PROTON LAUNCH SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY A.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROTON FAMILY The Proton is currently available to commercial Customers as the four-stage Proton M/Breeze M configuration. Multiple payload fairing designs are presently qualified for flight. The lower three stages of the Proton are produced by the KhSC plant in Moscow. KhSC also produces the Breeze M Upper Stage, the carbon composite PayLoad Adapter (PLA) structures and the PayLoad Fairings (PLFs). Production capacity for the commercial Proton is approximately eight vehicles per year. The overall heights of the vehicle is approximately 60 m (197 ft), while the diameter of the second and third stages, and of the first stage core tank, is 4.1 m (13.5 ft). Maximum diameter of the first stage, including the outboard fuel tanks, is 7.4 m (24.3 ft). The Breeze M has a diameter of 4.0 m (13.1 ft). Total mass of the Proton at launch is approximately 705,000 kg (1,554,200 lbm). The general characteristics of the Proton M Breeze M are shown in Table A.1-1. Table A.1-1: Proton M/Breeze M General Characteristics Parameter Value LV Lift-off Mass (Metric Tons, MT) 705 Payload Mass for 3-stage LV without Upper Stage (MT) 23.0 Hcirc. = 180 km, i = 51.5 GSO Payload Systems Mass (MT) 3.25 Hcirc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003 Your Satellite Connection to the World SES GLOBAL Is the World’S Premier Provider of Satellite-Delivered Services
    Your Satellite Connection to the World Disclaimer: Only the printed version of this report is the official document Annual Report 2003 Your satellite connection to the world SES GLOBAL is the world’s premier provider of satellite-delivered services. As a strategic management company, SES GLOBAL operates through a unique net- work of leading satellite operators around the world. This network comprises the fully-owned SES ASTRA in Europe and SES AMERICOM in the US, as well as participations in regional satellite operators. Contents 2003 2002 4 Chairman’s statement Financial summary EURmillion EUR million 6 President and CEO’s statement Total revenues 1,207.5 1,349.3 Operational review EBITDA 942.8 1,107.1 8 SES GLOBAL Operating profit 371.7 529.1 12 SES ASTRA Profit of the Group 205.4 204.5 18 SES AMERICOM 24 Global partners Net operating cash flow 873.8 1,051.8 Corporate governance Free cash flow 940.3 306.4 29 SES GLOBAL shareholders 30 Board of Directors Capital expenditure 317.0 683.8 32 Committees of the Board of Directors 34 Executive Committee Net debt 1,699.1 2,661.1 35 Stock-related compensation schemes Shareholders’ equity 3,247.8 3,575.1 35 Our people 36 Our values Earnings per A-share (in EUR) 0.34 0.34 37 Corporate Social Responsibility 38 Management discussion and analysis Dividend per A-share (in EUR) 0.22* 0.20 SES GLOBAL Group Contract backlog 6,435 5,980 consolidated accounts 43 Report of the independent auditor 44 Consolidated balance sheet Employees 789 808 46 Consolidated profit and loss account 47 Consolidated statement of cash flow Key performance ratios in % 48 Consolidated statement of changes EBITDA margin 78.1 82.1 in shareholders’ equity Net income margin 17.0 15.2 49 Notes to the consolidated accounts Return on average equity 6.0 5.5 SES GLOBAL S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Industry Defined the Space Industry Is Segmented Into Three Distinct Areas: Space, Control, and User
    Spring 2007 Industry Study Final Report The Space Industry The Industrial College of the Armed Forces National Defense University Fort McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319-5062 SPACE INDUSTRY STUDY 2007 ABSTRACT: U.S. space domination is far from guaranteed as the number of space-faring nations increases. The U.S. space industry remains a critical element in providing capabilities essential to national security and economic prosperity. The ability to access space for communications, monitoring, research, and exploration is vital. To ensure these, U.S. policy should encourage more commercial activity in space, emphasize a more globally cooperative environment, change acquisition methods to emphasize cost control over performance at any cost, and focus government investments on technologies having the greatest impact on the space industry. LtCol Carmine Borrelli, U.S. Marine Corps Ms. Danielle Buckon, Dept. of the Navy Mr. Bruce Cogossi, Dept. of the Army Ms. Cynthia Davidson, Defense Intelligence Agency Ms. Cristie Ditzler-Smith, Dept. of the Air Force Mr. August Doddato Dept. of the Air Force COL Charles Gabrielson, U.S. Army LTC Kenneth Hubbard, U.S. Army COL Kent Jacocks, U.S. Army COL Valerie Jircitano, U.S. Army Mr. Mark Jones, U.S. Coast Guard Col Jeffrey Koch, U.S. Air Force CDR Brent Kyler, U.S. Navy Ms Lisa McCauley, Battelle Mr. Anthony Reardon, Dept. of the Air Force LtCol Peter Yeager, U.S. Marine Corps CAPT Ken Buell, U.S. Navy, Faculty Dr. Scott Loomer, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, Faculty Mr. Tom Drake, National Security Agency, Faculty PLACES VISITED Domestic Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC Futron Corporation, Washington, DC Satellite Industry Association, Washington, DC National Security Space Office, Washington, DC Intelsat Corporation, Washington, DC National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Headquarters, Washington, DC Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL 45th Space Wing Delta IV Horizontal Integration Facility Naval Ordnance Test Unit, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    2001 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts Federal Aviation Administration's Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 2001 ABOUT THE ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION (AST) AND THE COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (COMSTAC) The Federal Aviation Administration’s senior executives from the U.S. commercial Associate Administrator for Commercial Space space transportation and satellite industries, Transportation (AST) licenses and regulates U.S. space-related state government officials, and commercial space launch activity as authorized other space professionals. by Executive Order 12465, Commercial Expendable Launch Vehicle Activities, and the The primary goals of COMSTAC are to: Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended. AST’s mission is to license and • Evaluate economic, technological and regulate commercial launch operations to ensure institutional issues relating to the U.S. public health and safety and the safety of commercial space transportation industry property, and to protect national security and foreign policy interests of the United States • Provide a forum for the discussion of issues during commercial launch operations. The involving the relationship between industry Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984 and the and government requirements 1996 National Space Policy also direct the Federal Aviation Administration to encourage, • Make recommendations to the Administrator facilitate, and promote commercial launches. on issues and approaches for Federal policies and programs regarding the industry. The Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) provides Additional information concerning AST and information, advice, and recommendations to the COMSTAC can be found on AST’s web site, at Administrator of the Federal Aviation http://ast.faa.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of NEC Space Business (Launch of Satellite Integration Center)
    Introduction of NEC Space Business (Launch of Satellite Integration Center) July 2, 2014 Masaki Adachi, General Manager Space Systems Division, NEC Corporation NEC Space Business ▌A proven track record in space-related assets Satellites · Communication/broadcasting · Earth observation · Scientific Ground systems · Satellite tracking and control systems · Data processing and analysis systems · Launch site control systems Satellite components · Large observation sensors · Bus components · Transponders · Solar array paddles · Antennas Rocket subsystems Systems & Services International Space Station Page 1 © NEC Corporation 2014 Offerings from Satellite System Development to Data Analysis ▌In-house manufacturing of various satellites and ground systems for tracking, control and data processing Japan's first Scientific satellite Communication/ Earth observation artificial satellite broadcasting satellite satellite OHSUMI 1970 (24 kg) HISAKI 2013 (350 kg) KIZUNA 2008 (2.7 tons) SHIZUKU 2012 (1.9 tons) ©JAXA ©JAXA ©JAXA ©JAXA Large onboard-observation sensors Ground systems Onboard components Optical, SAR*, hyper-spectral sensors, etc. Tracking and mission control, data Transponders, solar array paddles, etc. processing, etc. Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation ©JAXA (TANSO) CO2 distribution GPS* receivers Low-noise Multi-transponders Tracking facility Tracking station amplifiers Dual- frequency precipitation radar (DPR) Observation Recording/ High-accuracy Ion engines Solar array 3D distribution of TTC & M* station image
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2002
    Your Satellite Connection to the World Disclaimer: Only the printed version of this report is the official document Annual Report 2002 Contents 2 Chairman’s statement Key financial highlights 4 President and CEO’s statement > Growth in revenues by 38% to EUR 1.35 billion, reflecting Operational review 8 SES GLOBAL the first full-year’s contribution from SES AMERICOM, 12 SES ASTRA 18 SES AMERICOM North America’s premier satellite operator. 24 Global partners 28 SES GLOBAL shareholders > EBITDA of EUR 1.1 billion, representing an EBITDA 29 Board of Directors 30 Annual activities report of the margin of 82%. Board of Directors 31 Executive Committee 34 Management discussion and analysis > Profit of the Group declined to EUR 205 million, after SES GLOBAL Group deduction of goodwill amortisation and financing consolidated accounts 39 Report of the independent auditor charges related to the acquisition of SES AMERICOM. 40 Consolidated balance sheet 42 Consolidated profit and loss account 43 Consolidated statement of cash flow > Strong net operating cash flow of EUR 1,052 million 44 Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity contributed to net debt reduction of EUR 479 million, 45 Notes to the consolidated accounts to less than EUR 2.7 billion. SES GLOBAL S.A. accounts 63 Report of the statutory auditor > Group synergies continued, including satellite 64 Balance sheet 65 Profit and loss account as well as launch vehicle procurement and 66 Notes to the accounts multi-satellite launch insurance. 71 Five year financial summary 72 Shareholder information 73 Companies of the Group > Contract backlog remains the highest in the industry at EUR 6 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Broadcasting
    DIGITAL BROADCASTING Implementation of new services and their position in Multimedia World ICTP 11.02.-01.03.02 Digital Broadcasting OUTLINE • Scope of the lecture • Why digital • Specifics of Broadcasting • Transition from Analogue to Digital • Broadcasting and Multimedia ICTP 11.02.-01.03.02 Digital Broadcasting Scope of the lecture • Overview of the scene • Case demonstration • European perspective ICTP 11.02.-01.03.02 Digital Broadcasting Why digital • Because it is Digital! – Sharing technology with IT industry – Improvement in quality – Spectrum efficiency – New services possible ICTP 11.02.-01.03.02 Digital Broadcasting Specifics of Broadcasting • Biggest user base in radiocommunications • Political importance • Inherent inertia • Backward compatibility aspects –AM to FM – B&W to Color – Terrestrial vs. Satellite ICTP 11.02.-01.03.02 Digital Broadcasting Digital drives satellite market growth Analogue vs. digital audience 40.0 35.0 12.69 30.0 3.58 7.67 1.94 0.35 25.0 20.0 15.0 27.54 25.61 27.15 26.23 25.24 10.0 n Mill. DTH/SMATV Households DTH/SMATV n Mill. i 5.0 0.0 YE96 YE97 YE98 YE99 YE00 Analogue reception Digital reception ICTP 11.02.-01.03.02 Digital Broadcasting Terrestrial vs. Satellite broadcasting Reception modes Market share of satellite systems No answer 2.8% Cable Others only 63.64 mio (31.0%) Satellite 15.4% 37.93 mio (18.5%) ASTRA and ASTRA only others 55.9% 25.8% Terrestrial only 103.80 mio (50.5%) Base: 205.37 mio TV Base: 37.93 mio households in Europe* DTH/SMATV households in Europe* * 29 EuropeanICTP 11.02.-01.03.02
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    Federal Aviation Administration 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2013 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) • i • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover: The Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Antares rocket is seen as it launches from Pad-0A of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Sunday, April 21, 2013. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 COMSTAC 2013 COMMERCIAL GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT LAUNCH DEMAND FORECAST .
    [Show full text]