Congressional Record-Senate. 1823

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record-Senate. 1823 1884. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 1823 PETITIONS, ETC. SENATE. The following petitions and papers were laid on the Clerk's desk, THURSDAY, under the rule, and referred as follows: March 13, 1884. By M:r. BLANCHARD: Memorial of the Louisiana Educational So-· Prayer by the Chaplain, Rev. E. D. HUNTLEY, D. D. ciety, for national aid to the cause of education-to the Committee on The Journal of yesterday's proceedings was read and approved. Education. By Mr. J. H. BREWER: Petition for a harbor of refuge at Atlantic EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATION. City, N. J.-to the Committee on Rivers and Harbors. The PRESIDENT pro tempo-re laid before the Senate a communication By Mr. CALDWELL: Petition of workmen of Nashville, Tenn., rela­ from the Attorney-General, transmitting, in response to a resolution of tive to the Chinese restriction act-to the Committee on·Foreign Af­ the 25th ultimo, information in regard to the failure of the Central and fairs. Union Pacific Raihoad Companies to comply with the requirements of By Mr. CALKINS: Resolutions of Nelson Post, No.6~, Grand Army the act of May 7, 1878, and the steps taken by him relative thereto· of the Republic, Department of Indiana, asking for equalization of which, with the accompanying papers, was referred to the Committe~ bounties, &c. -to the Select Committee on Payment of Pensions, on the Judiciary, and ordered to be printed. Bounty, and Back Pay. PETITIONS AND 1\fEMORIALS. Also, petition of citizens of Winchester, relative to education in Alaslur-to the Committee on Education. The PRESIDENT pro tempore presented a petition of the Chamber of By 1.Ir. S. S. COX: Petition of 110 depositors in the Freedman's Commerce of the city of Tacoma, on Puget Sound in Washington Bank-to the same committee. ~~rritory, praying that the propo ition before Congrek to declare a for­ By W. W. CULBERTSON: Petition of citizens of Concord, Lewis feiture of the C~'lde land grant to theNorthern Pacific Railroad Com­ County,. Kentucky, asking for an appropriation w build breakwaters at pany in aid of the construction of the Cascade division ofits main line Ripraps-to the Committee on Rivers and Harbors. be non-concurred in; which was referred to the Committee on Public By Mr. EVERHART: Petition and protest of proprietors and em­ Lands. ployes of J. M. Sharpless-& Co., Chester, Pa., against any reduction or Mr. CONGER presented the petition of William Greenonah and 86 agitation of the question of reduction of tariff duties-to the Committee other c.itizens of Sault Ste. Marie, ~.fich., in favor of granting to the on Ways and Means. Cathohc church of that place the str1p of land lying between their lati­ By lli. HANCOCK: Memorial of John A. Green and others, request­ itude, 97°, and the Saint Mary's River in case of the sale of the Fort ing an increase of salary of the United States district judges of Texas­ Brady military reservation; which was referred to the Committee on to the Committee on the Judiciary. Military .Affairs. By Mr. HART: Resolutions of Moons Scroufe Post, Grand Army of He also presented the petition of George Johnson, of Detroit Mich. the Republic, MountOrab, Ohio, for increase of pension-to the Select .praying compensatio~ for wrongs, injuries, and losses suffered 'by hi~ Committee on Payment of Pensions, Bounty, and Back Pay. ~ cons~uence of the illegal a,nd ~ongful action of the military author­ By Mr. D. B. HENDERSON: Petitions from members of the bar of Ities dunng the war of the rebellion; which was referred to the Com­ Scott County, Iowa, asking an increase of pay of United States district mittee on Military .Affairs. judges-to the Committee on the Judiciary. JI.Ir. COCKRELL presentedana:ffidavitto accompany the bill (S. 948) By1.Ir.HOBLITZELL: Papersrelatingtothe claimofW. P. Wood­ granting a pension to Emma A. Porch; which was referred to the Com­ to the Committee on Appropriations. mittee on Pensions. By Mr. KING: Petition of the bar of Monroe, La., for increase of Mr. DOLPH. I present a memorial of the Chamber of Commerce of salaries of Federal circuit and district judges-to the Committee on the the city of Tacoma, Wash., remonstrating against the forfeiture of the Judiciary. Cascade land grant to the Northern Pacific Railroad Company. I ask Also, bill making an appropriation of $20,000 for the improvement that it be read. of the Tensas River, in the State of Louisiana-to the Committee on The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Chair will state to the Senator Rivers and Harbors. from Oregon that a memorial from the same chamber of commerce was Also, bill making an appropriation of $20,000 for the improvement sent to the Chair, which the Chair laid before the Senate and had re­ of the Boeuf1liver, in the State of Louisiana-to the same committee. ferred to the Committee on Public Lands. Also, bill appropriating $26,000 for the improvement of the Bayou lli. DOLPH. I was not in when the Chair presented it. If the memorial presented by the Chair was not read I ask that this be read Bartholomew, in the State of Louisiana-to the same committee. 1 Also, bill making an appropriation of $100,000 for the improvement so that it may go into the RECORD. of the Ouachita River, in the States of Louisiana and Arkansas-to the . The PRESIDENT p1·o tempore. The Senator from Oregon asks unan­ same committee. llllous consent that the memorial presented by him be read. Is there Also, bill making an appropriation of $200,000 for the improvement objection? The Chair hears no objection. of the mouth of Red River, Louisiana-to the same committee. The memorial was read, and referred to the Committee on Public By Mr. LACEY: Memorial of Henry Willis, of Battle Creek Mich. Lands, as follows: in favor of legislation obliging railroad companies to use unif~rm and Memorial to Congre s against the forfeiture of the Cascade land grant. safe car-couplers-to the Committee on Railways and Canals. To the Senate and House of Representatives Also, memorial of Henry Willis, of Battle Creek, Mich., in favor of of tlte United States of America in Congress assembled: Your memorialist, the Chamber of Commerce of the city of Tacoma on Puget H. R. 4991, providing for survey of ship-canal from Lake ltfichigan to Sound, in Washington Territory, begs leave respectfully to repre e~t to your the Detroit River-to the same committee. honorable bodies : By 1iir. UcADOO: Petition of 1\Iatthew W. Berriman-to the Com­ 1. ~hat the Northetn Pac~c Railroad Company was chartered to build a line mittee on Military .Affairs. of railroad from L~ke Supenor to Puget Sound; that it has built said line from Duluth to Wallula, m th~ easternpa:t:tof Washingt.on Territory, from which place By lli. McKINLEY: Resolution of the Knights of Labor of Canton wes~ard to Por~land, m Oregon, Its passengers and freight for all portions of Ohio, relative to the Chinese restriction act-to the Committee o~ W~hmgton Te.r:nt.ory: we t of the Cascade Mountains are transported over the Foreign .Affairs. ra.Il.roa~ an~ nver lines of another company ; that in continuation of its mam line dir~ct t.o Puget Sound across the Cascade Mountains it has built By Jl.¥. PARKER: Petition of members of the Grand Army of the twenty-five miles of road westward from Ainsworth, near said Wallula which Republic posts of Franklin County, New York, in favor of more lib­ road ha~ b~en accepted by the ~resident. of the United States, and still ~ries on such bwlding westward; that 1t has bmlt one hundred and fifty miles of road eral pension laws-to the Select Committee on Payment of Pensions, from PorUand to Tacoma, its western terminus; that from Tacoma. eastward it Bounty, and Back Pay. has built thirty miles of its direct line across the Cascade Mountains making in By Mr. PETERS: The petition of Farragut Post, No. 37, Grand all fifty-five miles of its Cascade division already built· that aboutt~o hundred miles of said Cascade division yet remain to be built, a~d that until the same be Army of the Republic, Burrton, Kans., for the passage of bill pension­ bui!t theNorthern Pacific Railroad will not have been completed from Lake Su­ ing ex-prisoners-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. penor to Puget Sound. By Mr. .J. H. ROGERS: Papers relating to the claim of Pryor N. 2. That the distance from Ainsworth, where said Cascade division connects with the main line\ to t!J.e P~get Sound termin us of ~he road by the present route Lea-to the Committee on Claims. down the Columbia .River 1s over one hundred miles longer than the distance By Mr. W. F. ROGERS: Petition of workingmen of the city of Buf­ between the same pomts by the uncompleted Cascade division. falo, N.Y., relative to the Chinese restriction act-to the Committee .3 .. ~hat the country thr~m~h ~h~ch the unc<?mpleted portion of the Cascade diVlSlOn has been located lSnch m timber, coal, ll'on, copper and other minerals on Foreign .Affairs. !ind in agricultural capabilities, which can not be developed until that divisio~ By Mr. STORM: Papers relatingtothe claim of Amos Stroh-to the lS completed. Committee on Invalid Pensions. 4. That the fuel and lumber which abound west of the Cascade Mountains are needed ~ the settlement and. development of the fertile prairie country on the By Mr.
Recommended publications
  • 1863-11-20, [P ]
    1 s anti se terili/, do ordain a,:d estabhsh this Constitu­ inrnm^jgiacnit* J-U îâTfiîIjj IFftion. pears rather long and only prospective; GENERAL ORDERN, NO. 59. tion for the United States of America. ÄTThe communication signed “ Estclla, never do for all the Union men of Dcmwuru _ whereas, a short form, such us the follow- The following order was issued by the Quiet Retreat,” has been received. Will the to leave tlieir homes and juiu the army, al­ This Constitution of the United States, ing would have answeid every purpose for THE DELAWARE ELECTION. though we believe they would all of them like GEOROETOWS, UKI,. Genoral commanding the department, to be author please send name and residence, thus adopted in September 1787, in a | which it was intended—» I do solemnly to be hero with us—and wo believe what used at our election (Thursday). The order! rill DAY, miMBEB »0, 1863. Peterson's Magazine.—Wo are in receipt of Union men are left home, will keep Copper­ Convention elected by the people—was j swear that I will not, directly or indircct- contaius the çath of allegiance which the ' head igiu trampled beneath their feet. We submitted for ratification—not to the state*, ly, do anything hostile to the United States this popular Lady’s Magazine, for December. also wish to explain to the satisfaction of To CorrMpend.nl* aud «them. copperhoads so much detest. It is a splendid number. “ Peterson ” will be hut to the people of the United States— Government, not; hare I aided or abetted those at home, the political feeling of the solJ Vf.
    [Show full text]
  • James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg
    “Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: an Explanation and Case Study
    Journal of Leadership Education Volume 11, Issue 1 – Winter 2012 Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: An Explanation and Case Study Bradley Z. Hull, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Logistics Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Scott J. Allen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Management Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Abstract The authors describe an exploratory analytical tool called The 5Ps Leadership Analysis (Personal Attributes, Position, Purpose, Practices/Processes, and Product) as a heuristic for better understanding the complexities of leadership. Using The 5Ps Leadership Analysis , the authors explore the leadership of General Robert E. Lee of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia and General George B. McClellan of the Union Army of the Potomac—more specifically, the leadership of the two generals on September 17, 1862 during the Battle of Antietam. The paper concludes with suggestions for application in the classroom. Introduction This case study examines how two organizations compete and how two leaders can influence change and success given their resources. One organization is small and underfinanced with antiquated equipment. The other is large, well financed, and organized along traditional lines where each part of the organization operates autonomously and is coordinated by top levels of management. This type of confrontation between a small organization and a large competitor occurs often in American business. Two relevant examples might be Dell (in its early days) versus Compaq and Amazon.com (in its early days) versus Barnes and Noble or the now bankrupt Borders.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Republican Army: the Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War
    Civil War Book Review Fall 2017 Article 14 The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War Zachery Fry Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Fry, Zachery (2017) "The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 19 : Iss. 4 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.19.4.19 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol19/iss4/14 Fry: The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicaliz Review Fry, Zachery Fall 2017 Matsui, John H. The First Republican Army: The Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War. University of Virginia Press, $39.50 ISBN 9780813939278 John Pope, the Army of Virginia, and the Road to Hard War Civil War historians find the political motives behind Union squabbles in the Eastern Theater fascinating. Scholars and lay readers alike can count on a constant barrage of books on the high command of the Army of the Potomac, for instance, replete with well-worn accounts of backstabbing by George McClellan, Fitz John Porter, and Joseph Hooker. Over the past several years, however, a critical mass of innovative literature by young scholars such as Timothy Orr and Jonathan White has emerged to investigate the rich intersections of soldier ideology and command politics, adding to earlier pioneering work by historians such as John Hennessy. Instead of debating how many Union soldiers embraced emancipation, as scholars of the 1990s and early 2000s did, historians now want to know what that undeniable ideological divide meant for command and control.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanover Courthouse: the Nionu 'S Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Winter 1999 Hanover Courthouse: The nionU 's Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Coggeshall, Jerry J.. "Hanover Courthouse: The nionU 's Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure" (1999). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/f9k9-0564 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HANOVER COURTHOUSE: THE UNION'S TACTICAL VICTORY AND STRATEGIC FAILURE by Jerry Joseph Coggeshail B.A. May 1997, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 1999 Harold S. Wilson (Director) Annecce nnie Sweeneys Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number 1398157 Copyright 2000 by Coggeshall, Jerry Joseph All rights reserved. UMI__ ® UMI Microform 1398157 Copyright 2000 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Generals Ambrose Everett Burnside (1824-1881) Poore, Benjamin
    Union Generals Ambrose Everett Burnside (1824-1881) Poore, Benjamin. The Life and Public Services of Ambrose E. Burnside. Providence, Rhode Island: J.A. & R.A. Reid, 1882. E B967p Woodbury, Augustus. Major General Ambrose E. Burnside and the Ninth Army Corps. Providence: S.S. Rider & Brother, 1867. F834 P86.9 W884 David Glasgow Farragut (1801-1870) Duffy, James P. Lincoln’s Admiral: The Civil War Campaigns of David Farragut. New York: Wiley, 1997. E F2393d Farragut, Loyall. The Life of David Glasgow Farragut, First Admiral of the United States Navy, Embodying his Journal and Letters. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1879. E F2393f Hill, Jim Dan. Sea Dogs of the Sixties: Farragut and Seven Contemporaries. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1935. F8347 H646s Lewis, Charles Lee. David Glasgow Farragut. Annapolis: United States Naval Institute, 1941- 43. E F2393L Mahan, A.T. Admiral Farragut. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1897. E F2393m Andrew Hull Foote (1806-1863) Hoppins, J. M. Life of Andrew Hull Foote, Rear-Admiral United States Navy. New York: Harper & Bros., 1874. E F688h Ulysses Simpson Grant (1822-1885) Catton, Bruce. Grant Moves South. Boston: Little, Brown, 1988, c1960. F896.3 G76cat2 1988 Catton, Bruce. Grant Takes Command. Boston: Little, Brown, 1969. F896.3 G76cat3 1990 Grant, Ulysses S. Memoirs and Selected Letters: Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant, Selected Letters 1839-1865. New York: Library of America, 1990. F896.3 G759p 1990 Lewis, Lloyd. Captain Sam Grant. Boston: Little, Brown, 1950. F896.3 G76Le McFeely, William S. Grant: A Biography. New York: Norton, 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • 629.L332 2097 3 CHIVA *' -Liliilffiilflfiililililififliie L BRARY
    629.L332 2097 3 CHIVA *' -liliilffiilflfiililililIfifliiE L BRARY 24065 U.S. Infantry troops break camp June 30' 1898'for the attack on El Caney, Cuba Note the balloon Santiago above the tree line. Courtesy of the National Archives. In the 1780s Benjarnin Franklin was the United States'minister to France. At one of the Montgolfier brothers first balloon laurchings a cynical observer rernarked, "Of what possible use is it?" Said Franklin, who foresaw many possibilities for aeronautics, "Of what use is a newborn babe?" THE HISTORY OF The United States Air Force taces its origins EARLY to the establishment of the Aeronautical Dvision, created on August l, 1907 by the ENLISTED Chief Signal Officer of the Army However, the U.S. Army frst used "aerial devices" for AERONAUTICS military purposes during the American Civil War. when it created an unofficial balloon section. An offrcial balloon section was established in 1891. Consequently, enlisted 1862 TO 1907 support for U.S. military aviation began with Civil War balloon operations. Interest in the military applications of ballooning in the United States can be linked by to one of our nation's forefathers, Benjamin William I. Chivalette Franklin. After witnessing the flight of the and Montgolfiers (famous balloonists), Franklin W. Parker Hayes,Jr. predicted that the military would soon find uses for the balloon. But it was not until Airmen Memorial Museum 1840, during the Second Seminole War, that his prediction almost proved true. The Seminoles, intimate with the without being apprized of the balloonist's tangled swamps of their Florida homeland, scheme. persistently evaded capture by the army sent to During the Civil War, balloons were force their "removal" to the Indian Territory in used by both sides, but mostly by the North, the West.
    [Show full text]
  • \U25a0jßfciw If
    tp \u25a0jßfciw if VOL. VIII. ST. PAUL, SATURDAY MORNING, JUNE 20, 1886 -TWELVE PAGES. N"O. 17 7 By Wilson, this time Eeno had began to unfortunate soldiers. Ifgentlemen thought j Evans, . Logan, v^.f- (la.) the men proved 1 : clinched. Trussell himself* ON A BLOODY FIELD. retreat to the hill several hundred AFTER LONG WAITING. they were making 'creditable,'' history . let Fryc, \ Manderson, CARDIFF THE VICTOR. good go himself, referee ana jumped between yards in his rear and, as Gall said, "We them on. For while he lived thorn -with spirit. Tho Minneapolitan he would appeal to the nonorof Macountry, (Recapitulation: Yeas, Republican 7 [in- good knew we had him safe. We moved olf ; 23; b~t in work again and sent Sail, the Great Sioux Chief, Tells the The Senate Yesterday Passed the House to the integrity of its people and to the cluding It.ddlebergcr.clnd.;] Democrats The Long-Anticipatod couple down where the other soldiers were, in- 1 Match Wilson to lean on the rope a JUSTICE BIS CAUSE nays, .-Republican The Democrats are Between for of tending or • IT. seconds. They passed a few exchanges, Story of the Pall of Ouster's to settle them and then come Billfor Gen. Pitz John Porter's pleaded poor \u25a0 marked with *.) Heavy- Weights and while ho for the Union men a tho Rival of Cardiff clinched again Afoul was claimed, back after him." He said, however, that Reinstatement, against of our own side who proved number of pairs announced. Mr. Command. enough already those A were the Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maine Bugle 1894
    r THE MAINE BUGLE. Entered at the Po$t Office, Rockland, Me., at Second-Ctati Matter. Campaign I. January, 1894. Call i Its echoing notes your memories shall renew From sixty-one until the grant! review. UBLISHED QUARTERLY, JANUARY, APRIL, JULY AND OCTOBER, AND WILL BE THE ORGAN OF THE " MEN OF MAINE " WHO SERVED IN THE WAR OF THE REBELLION. NO OTHER STATE HAS A PROUDER RECORD. IT WILL CONTAIN THE PROCEEDINGS OF THEIR YEARLY REUNIONS, MATTERS OF HISTORIC VALUE TO EACH REGI- MENT, AND ITEMS OF PERSONAL INTEREST TO ALL ITS MEMBERS. IT IS ALSO THE ORGAN OF THE CAVALRY SOCIETY OF THE ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL PUBLISH THE ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS OF THAT SOCIETY AND CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE VARIOUS REGIMENTS NORTH AND SOUTH WHICH PARTICIPATED IN THE WAR OF THE REBELUON. PRICE ONE DOLLAR A YEAR, OR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS A CALL Editors, Committees from the Maine Regiments. Published by the Maine Association. Address, J. P. Cuxey, Treasurer, RoCKlAND, Mainb. L rs^^ A . A. 41228 Save Money. — Regular Subscribers and those not regular subscribers to the Bugle may, by ordering through us the periodicals for which they arc subscrib- ers, add Bf r.i.E at a greatly reduced price if not without cost. Thus if you wish, let us say, Cosmopolitan and Harper^s Monthly, send the money through this ofTice and we will add Bugle to the list without extra cost. Regular With Price Bugle Arena, *5-oo Army and Navy Journal, Atlantic Monthly, Blue and CIray, Canadian Sportsman, Cassel's Family Magazine, Century, Cosmopolitan, Current Literature, Decorator and Furnisher, Demorest's Family Magazine Fancier, Godey's Ladies' Book, Harper's Bazar or Weekly, Harper's Magazine, Harper's Young People, Home Journal, Horseman, Illustrated American, Journal of Military Service and Institution, Judge, Life, Lippincott's Magazine, Littell's Living Age, North American Review, New England Magazine, Outing, Popular Science Monthly, Public Opinion, Review of Reviews, Scicntiiic American, Supplement, Both, same address.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-Senate. 1353
    1880. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 1353 By Mr. MILES: The petition of merchants, manufacturers, and con­ By Mr. AMOS TOWNSEND : The petitions of the publishers of the. sumers, that chrome iron ore and bichromate of potash be allowed to Ohio Farmer, Cleveland, Ohio, and of publishers of four other papers~ enter free of duty-to the Committee of Ways and Means. for the abolition of the duty on type-to the Committee of Ways and By Mr. MITCHELL: The petition of 43 late Union soldiers and Means. others, citizens of Arnot, Charleston, and vicinity, Tioga County, · By Mr. TYLER: The petitions of Lewis B. Hubbard, publisher of Pennsylvania., for the early passage of a law providing for the pay­ the Vermont Tribune, Ludlow, and of A. Chandler, publisher of the ment of the difference between the value of greenbacks, in which sol­ Vermont Record and Farmer, Brattleborough, Vermont, of similar diers were paid for their services, and the value of gold· at the time import-to the same committee. of payment-to the Committee on Military AffaiJ:s. By Mr. V ANOE : A paper relating to the claim of A. 1\f. Gudger By Mr. MONROE: The petitions of W.W. Woodruff, publisher of for pay for property ta.ken by the United States Army during the late the Gazette, Oberlin, and of Charles M. Brown, publisher of the Trib­ war-to the Committee on War Claims. une, Sandusky, Ohio, for the abolition of the duty on type-to the By Mr. WASHBURN: ThepetitionofC. Bridgman, L.A. Evans, and Committee of Ways and Means.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK· VIRGINIA National Battlefield Park
    .NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARK· VIRGINIA National Battlefield Park UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR • ]. A. Krug, Secretary National Park Service • Newton B. Drury, Director Capital of the Conj ederacy, Richmond became for 4 years the objective of the Federal Armies in the East RICHMOND THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN SYMBOL OF THE SOUTH GEN. GEORGE B. McCLELLAN'S ill-starred cam­ paign in the spring and summer of 1862 brought RICHMOND, VA., as capital of the Confederate battles to the very gates of Richmond, which in States of America during the Civil War, 1861--65, the aggregate surpassed in magnitude any pre­ was regarded as the symbol of the Southern Gov­ viously fought in the Western Hemisphere. The ernment. In consequence, throughout the con­ Federal plan of attack involved a giant pincer flict, Federal Armies made repeated attempts to movement against the Confederate Capital. capture this important city. Seven "on to Rich­ McClellan, with the Army of the Potomac, mond" drives, in the Eastern Theater of War, was expected to effect a landing on the penin­ were aimed at the Confederate Capital. Five of sula between the James and the York Rivers these were turned back some distance away, two and to advance from the east, while Gen. Irvin at Manassas and three in the vicinity of Fred­ McDowell, with a second Federal Army, ericksburg, while two act\lally brought the fight­ marched overland from Washington to join ing dangerously close to the Capital. From a McClellan's troops as they approached Rich­ strategic point of view the selection of Rich­ mond. McClellan brought his forces to the pen­ mond, near the head of the navigable James insula by water, and, after compelling the River and within 110 miles of the Federal Cap­ Southern forces to withdraw from their forti­ ital at Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Robert E. Lee and His Corps Commanders in the Civil War
    CHAIN OF COMMAND: AN ANALYSIS OF ROBERT E. LEE AND HIS CORPS COMMANDERS IN THE CIVIL WAR Aaron D. Lewis A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2016 Committee: Benjamin Greene, Advisor A. Dwayne Beggs Michael E. Brooks © 2016 Aaron Lewis All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Benjamin Greene, Advisor Robert E. Lee remains a mythical figure within the culture of the southern United States. Proponents of the Southern “Lost Cause of the Confederacy” argued that he embodied the idea of Southern morality and toughness. Lee’s accomplishments on the battlefield are what brought him such admiration in the south. The Confederate cause of “freedom,” Southerners believed, was still attainable as long as Marse Robert commanded the Army of Northern Virginia. Lee frequently led his undersized and under-equipped army to victory over the Union armies of the Eastern Theatre during the first half of the Civil War. Using a wide variety of primary sources, from the Official Records to the personal letters and memoirs of Civil War commanders, I argue that Lee directly benefitted from the abilities of Stonewall Jackson, and once he died, Lee’s ability to win on the battlefield greatly diminished. Victories at Antietam and Chancellorsville were the product of Lee’s quick-thinking, boldness, and a clear explanation of what he expected of his commanders, as well as the incompetence of the Union commanders he faced. Lee’s defeat at Gettysburg, however, is the product of poor clarification by Lee as to what he expected of his commanders, and his inability to consider the input of his subordinates.
    [Show full text]